![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 45, 32780-32791, November 9, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the St. Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
Received for publication, April 18, 2007 , and in revised form, August 2, 2007.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80% of the total membrane conductance is carried by Cl- (3), the vast majority through weakly voltage-dependent ClC-1 chloride channels (4) as demonstrated by mice deficient in ClC-1 whose muscle chloride conductance (GCl)3 is reduced to <10% of that of wild-type mice (5). In order for action-potential initiation and propagation to occur the magnitude of Na+ current must be great enough to overcome electrical shunting through open ClC-1 channels and depolarize the muscle membrane. A reduction of GCl due to ClC-1 inhibition decreases the amount of inward current required to depolarize the membrane, i.e. it increases the excitability of the membrane. The importance of this function of ClC-1 is underscored by the genetic disease myotonia, in which loss-of-function mutations of ClC-1 lead to skeletal muscle hyper-excitability (6). Many myotonia-causing mutations shift ClC-1 voltage dependence to more positive potentials resulting in channel inhibition across the physiological voltage range (7).
Working muscle becomes acidified due to lactic acid accumulation during moderate to high intensity activity (8). Acidification has been shown to result in recovery of muscle excitability and force when these have decreased due to elevated extracellular [K+] (9). More recent studies have shown that increased excitability at low intracellular pH (pHi) is due to reduced chloride conductance of the muscle membrane (10, 11). Low pH has long been known to reduce GCl in muscle membranes (12, 13), but previous studies of the pH sensitivity of recombinantly expressed ClC-1 have failed to reconcile the reduction of GCl of the membrane with a molecular mechanism acting directly on ClC-1. In patch clamp studies of heterologously expressed ClC-1, low pHi activated the channel by shifting voltage dependence of gating to more negative potentials (14-16). If acidosis caused similar activation of ClC-1 in the muscle membrane, this would tend to increase GCl and decrease membrane excitability, contrary to what is observed. Given that ClC-1 is responsible for the vast majority of the sarcolemmal GCl, this contradiction is unlikely to be explained by decreased activity of sarcolemmal chloride channels other than ClC-1. Rather, it appears likely that there is some aspect of the in vivo pH effects on ClC-1 that are not recapitulated when ClC-1 is recombinantly expressed.
ClC-1 is a skeletal muscle-specific member of the ClC family of chloride channels and transporters. All eukaryotic members of this family comprise a large membrane-embedded domain followed by two cytoplasmic cystathionine
-synthase (CBS)-related domains. The prototypical, and best studied, channel in this family is ClC-0 from the electric organ of Torpedo electric rays. Based initially on the characteristics of ClC-0 single channel records (17) and supported by the structures of bacterial ClC homologs (18), there is good evidence that ClC proteins function as homo-dimers in which each monomer contains a separate ion-conducting pore. Single channel records of both ClC-0 (17) and ClC-1 (19) show two distinct forms of gating, rapid "protopore gating," which independently opens or closes individual pores within a dimer, and a slower "common gating" process that opens or closes both pores simultaneously. For ClC-1, the two gating mechanisms have relatively similar kinetics at negative potentials but can be kinetically separated in whole cell currents with a short pulse to very positive potentials, selectively opening the protopore gate (14). Protopore gating appears to involve very minor changes in protein structure, primarily movement of a conserved glutamate side chain at the extracellular channel mouth (20). In contrast, common gating appears to entail major conformational changes (21, 22), involving the dimer interface of the membrane domain (23) as well as the cytoplasmic CBS domains (24, 25).
Previously we have shown that ATP inhibits ClC-1 by shifting the voltage dependence of common gating to more positive potentials, a process mediated by the intracellular CBS domains (24). We postulated that the physiological relevance of ATP modulation of ClC-1 may be to protect cells from metabolic exhaustion by increasing GCl and decreasing muscle excitability when ClC-1 inhibition is relieved due to ATP depletion during intense activity or ischemia (24). Here we show that, in the presence of ATP, intracellular acidosis inhibits ClC-1 by enhancing both ATP sensitivity and the maximal effect of ATP on common gating and that His-847 in CBS domain 2 is a key residue in this process. These findings identify a molecular mechanism for the modulation of recombinant ClC-1 by acidosis that, in the presence of physiological intracellular concentrations of ATP, is consistent with the decreased GCl and increased excitability seen with acidosis in skeletal muscle. These findings also indicate that the primary physiological significance of ATP modulation of ClC-1 may be in maintaining excitability and opposing fatigue by potentiating the inhibitory effect of acidosis on ClC-1.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electrophysiology—Patch clamp experiments were conducted at room temperature (23 ± 1 °C) in the whole cell configuration using an Axopatch 200B patch clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and associated standard equipment. Cells were continuously superfused with bath solution containing (mM): NaCl, 140; CsCl, 4; CaCl2, 2; MgCl2, 2; HEPES, 10; adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH. The standard pipette solution contained (mM): CsCl, 40; cesium glutamate, 80; EGTA-Na, 10; HEPES, 10; adjusted to pH 7.2 with NaOH. For low pH internal solutions, 10 mM MES was substituted for HEPES, and the pH was adjusted with NaOH. ATP was added to the pipette solution as a magnesium salt at a concentration of 5 mM. Adenosine was added to the pipette solution at a concentration of 5 mM. The pH was readjusted with NaOH after addition of ATP or adenosine. Aliquots were stored at -20 °C and diluted on the day of the experiment.
Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass and typically had resistance of 1-2 M
when filled with the above pipette solution. Series resistance did not exceed 4 M
and was 85-95% compensated. After rupturing the cell membrane and achieving the whole cell configuration, no less than 5 min was allowed for the pipette solution to equilibrate with the intracellular solution before current recordings were made. Currents obtained at a sampling frequency of 10 kHz were filtered at 5 kHz and collected using Axograph 4.9 (Axon Instruments) software. Applied membrane potentials were adjusted for junction potentials calculated using JPCalc (27).
Voltage-dependent channel activity was measured by applying a voltage test pulse, stepping in successive sweeps from -140 to +100 mV in 20-mV steps for a duration of 100-800 ms. This was followed by a 75-ms tail pulse at a set -100 mV. The instantaneous current amplitude at the start of the tail pulse was used as a measure of the open probability at the end of the test pulse. To measure the open probability of the common gate only, the protopore gate was fully opened by a 400-µs pulse to +170 mV between the test pulse and the tail pulse (14). The membrane was clamped to -30 mV for a period of 2 s between each sweep.
Data Analysis—Data were analyzed using Axograph 4.9 and Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) software. The channel open probability at the end of the test pulse, as a function of test pulse voltage, was determined by measuring the instantaneous current at the start of the tail pulse. This instantaneous current was determined by fitting current relaxations during the -100-mV tail pulse with an equation of the form,
![]() |
1 and
2 are the time constants of the fast and slow components of current relaxation, respectively, and A1, A2, and C are the amplitudes of the fast, slow, and steady-state components of the current, respectively. Instantaneous current amplitudes at the start of the -100-mV pulse (I(0)) were determined by extrapolation of this function. To obtain the voltage dependence of the apparent channel open-probability (Po), normalized instantaneous current amplitudes were fit with a modified Boltzmann distribution of the form,
![]() |
is the half-maximal activation potential, and k is the slope factor. To determine the voltage dependence of the slow, common gate that acts simultaneously on both protopores of the channel, a 400-µs pulse to +170 mV was inserted before the -100-mV tail pulse, to maximally activate the fast, protopore gates. Instantaneous tail-current amplitudes determined as described above were fit with Equation 2 to yield Po(V) for the common gate. Open probability of the protopore gate was determined by dividing the apparent channel open probability by the open probability of the common gate. These data were fit with Equation 2 to yield Po(V) curves for the protopore.
To determine the time course of current relaxations, activating currents were recorded for 500 ms at voltages from 0 to 100 mV in 20-mV increments directly after a 200-ms pulse to -140 mV to deactivate channels. Deactivating currents were recorded during 500-ms pulses between -140 and -40 mV in 20-mV increments directly after a 200-ms pulse to 100 mV to maximally activate current. Current activation was typically biexponential with time constants in the order of milliseconds and 10s of milliseconds (not shown). Deactivating currents were fit with two exponentials using Equation 1, where the fast (
1) and slow (
2) time constants are thought to correspond to protopore and common gating processes, respectively (14). Detailed characterization of ClC-1-gating transitions has indicated that at positive potentials the exponential component due to protopore gating is likely to be too fast to resolve in macroscopic current activation (14), so only the single exponential of common gating should be resolved. There were indications, however, of two exponentials in the time course of current activation, consistent with earlier reports (23). Because the two components could not be assigned to particular gating transitions, they were assumed to both contribute to the slow gating process and to simplify subsequent calculations of rate constants, the time course was approximated with a single exponential function (23) of the form,
![]() |
is assumed to correspond to common gating. The apparent opening (
) and closing (
) rate constants of the common gate were calculated from the time constants for current deactivation (
2, from Equation 1) and activation (
, from Equation 3) and the open probability Po using Equations 4 and 5 (28).
![]() |
![]() |
Unless otherwise labeled, all data, except raw current traces, are presented as the mean ± S.E. of recordings from three or more cells.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With this in mind we re-examined the dependence of ClC-1 gating on intracellular pH by using whole cell voltage clamp experiments to measure the channel activity of recombinant human ClC-1 expressed in HEK-293T cells. The intracellular pH was controlled by the buffered pH of the pipette solution. To ensure that the intracellular milieu had equilibrated with the pipette solution, current recordings were only made more than 5 min after achieving whole cell patch configuration by rupturing the membrane across the pipette tip. We cannot be sure of the precise intracellular pH, but, given the buffering capacity and relatively massive volume of the pipette solution, we assume that it matches that of the pipette solution. Consequently, we have not attempted to change the pH of the pipette solution during an experiment, so each cell is tested at only one internal pH. Measurement of ClC-1 currents in excised inside-out membrane patches would facilitate the ready exchange of the effective intracellular milieu, but we were unable to obtain sufficiently stable ClC-1 currents in this patch configuration.
Previous electrophysiological studies of ClC-1 dependence on intracellular pH have used relatively short, 100-200 ms, voltage pulses to drive the gating into steady state (14, 15, 29). Because the kinetics of ClC-1 macroscopic current relaxations is slowed at low pHi (14, 15, 29) we explored the use of longer voltage test pulses to ensure that the slow component of current relaxation, corresponding to common gating (14), reached steady state before measuring open probability with a set-voltage tail pulse. With the pipette (intracellular) solution at pH 6.2, we examined the effect on ClC-1 gating of progressively longer voltage test pulses, from 100 to 800 ms (Fig. 1A). To restrict our measurements to the common gate only, a 400-µs pulse to +170 mV was inserted at the end of the test pulse prior to the -100 mV tail pulse (Fig. 1A). Insertion of a short pulse such as this has been shown previously to completely open the protopore gate but is too short to have any significant effect on the common gate (14). Consequently, the tail current immediately after this short pulse gives a measure of the open probability of the common gate alone. Because the open probability overall is the product of that of the two gates, the open probability of the protopore gate can be determined by dividing the open probability overall by that of the common gate. Sample traces of the currents in response to different length test pulses (shown in Fig. 1B, with sweeps at different test pulse voltages overlaid) clearly demonstrate that currents did not reach steady state until the test pulse was longer that 400 ms. The instantaneous current peak at the start of the tail pulse, which measures open probability, also clearly changed with the length of test pulse, although the details of this were not clear until it was normalized and plotted against test pulse voltage (Fig. 1C). The longer test pulses clearly shifted the apparent voltage dependence of common gating to more positive potentials (Fig. 1C), emphasizing the importance of applying pulses of sufficient length to allow gating to reach equilibrium.
Visual inspection and fitting of exponentials to gating relaxations (data not shown) indicated that gating had essentially equilibrated by the end of an 800-ms voltage pulse. To ensure that chloride currents during these long voltage pulses had not significantly shifted the chloride equilibrium, we used current-clamp mode to measure the voltage at which there was zero current. This did not change immediately before and after the 800-ms voltage (results not shown), indicating that these longer pulses did not significantly affect chloride equilibrium, consistent with the work of others using similar voltage pulses (23). Consequently, we have used 800-ms voltage pulses throughout the remainder of this study.
|
|
7.2, changing pHi in either direction shifted the voltage dependence of common gating to more positive potentials (Fig. 2C). At the same time, decreasing pHi below 7.2 reduced the minimum value of the gating curve, Pcommonmin. In contrast, and as previously reported (14), decreasing pHi below 7.2 shifted the voltage dependence of protopore gating to slightly more negative potentials, and the minimum value of the gating curve was increased (Fig. 2D). Overall, when both gating mechanisms are taken into account, a decrease in pH from 7.2 to 6.2 reduced the open probability of ClC-1 across the range of physiologically relevant membrane potentials, consistent with the reduced skeletal muscle sarcolemmal chloride-conductance observed with acidosis (10-13).
Effects of Intracellular ATP and Protons on ClC-1 Common Gating Are Synergistic—Previously we have shown that intracellular ATP shifts the voltage dependence of ClC-1 common gating to more positive potentials (24), in a similar manner to the effect of acidosis described above. Because acidosis and ATP depletion can both occur in working skeletal muscle, we were interested to examine the interaction of these two modulatory effects on ClC-1. Consequently, we compared the effects on ClC-1 gating of acidosis and ATP, independently and in combination. Consistent with our previous finding that ATP had no effect on protopore gating of ClC-1 (24), we found that ATP had no effect on the pH dependence of protopore gating (data not shown). The effects of protons and ATP on the voltage dependence of common gating were found to be synergistic, with the two combined causing a shift to more positive potentials that was greater than the additive effects of each individually (Fig. 3, A and B). Indeed, the voltage dependence of common gating was shifted to such an extent that Po curves showed no obvious saturation at +100 mV, the maximum positive voltage for which we could make stable recordings, leading to increased uncertainties when fitting these data to a Boltzmann distribution and, most importantly, in the estimate of V
. The best fit of the Po data for 1 mM ATP at pH 6.2 (Fig. 3B) gives a V
of +71 mV but may be much greater or slightly less than this value without significantly reducing the goodness of fit. It is unlikely, however, that the V
is markedly <+71 mV, because this should show up as a clear inflection point in the data. The shift in the V
(
V
) due to a change in pH from 7.2 to 6.2 was increased
3-fold or more by the presence of saturating ATP. Similarly, the
V
due to saturating intracellular ATP was increased
2-fold or more by intracellular acidosis from pHi 7.2 to 6.2 (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, a shift in pH from 7.2 to 6.2 seemed to increase the apparent affinity for ATP (Fig. 3C). Certainly, lowering the pH increased the
V
caused by low concentrations of ATP but, because of the uncertainty in the measurement of V
in high [ATP], it was not clear whether this increase was entirely due to the larger magnitude of the effect of ATP or if it was partly due to a higher apparent affinity for ATP.
Next we measured a more complete dose-response relationship for the effect of protons on V
. An effective titration was difficult to achieve, however, because of both the narrow pH range over which whole cell currents could be measured and the relatively small effect of pH on V
in the absence of ATP. At 1 mM intracellular ATP the effect of pH on V
was great enough for a reasonable pH titration curve to be measured (Fig. 3D), but the data did not reach a clear plateau at low pH and suffered further from the uncertainty in V
estimates in this region. Also because 1 mM ATP is not saturating in the higher pH range of this titration, part of the
V
may be due to changes in ATP affinity. Consequently, it was not feasible to make a precise estimate of the apparent pKa for the effect of protons on common gating, but these data do indicate that the pKa is below 6.7 and is broadly compatible with the apparent pKa of 5.5 obtained for whole muscle chloride conductance (13). This in vivo measurement of pKa may be an underestimate, because the pH values in this study were reported for the external solution, whereas the one or more titratable groups are probably located on the inside of the cell membrane (13). Although the data presented above do not allow us to precisely define all the parameters of pH and ATP modulation of ClC-1 common gating, they clearly demonstrate that physiological concentrations of ATP dramatically enhance the inhibitory effect of acidosis on ClC-1, identifying a vital factor in rationalizing the regulation of recombinant ClC-1 with the regulation of skeletal muscle chloride conductance in vivo.
|
|
V
or the apparent affinity for adenosine. These data demonstrate that the proton potentiation of the effect of ATP requires the phosphates of ATP and so is more consistent with a direct electrostatic interaction than an allosteric mechanism. Furthermore these data demonstrate that proton potentiation is not due to protonation of the adenosine moiety. The pH titration for proton potentiation (Fig. 3D) is consistent with the pKa for protonation of the
-phosphate of ATP (30) or for protonation of a number of amino acid side chains, particularly histidine but also possibly glutamate and aspartate. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that the enhanced effect of ATP with acidosis is due to direct electrostatic interactions between the phosphate groups of ATP and charged residues of ClC-1, where one of these two partners becomes protonated. Improved Modeling of a Putative ATP-binding Site in CBS Domains of ClC-1—We have presented previously (24) a model of the CBS domains of ClC-1 built by homology to related domains in inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase (Protein Data Bank entry 1ZFJ [PDB] ). Guided by computational docking of nucleotides to this model, we showed that His-847 in CBS2 of ClC-1 is important for modulation of ClC-1 by ATP and proposed that it interacts with the ribose moiety of ATP bound in the cleft between the two CBS domains (24). It was this hypothesized interaction that prompted us to investigate the interaction between protons and ATP in ClC-1 modulation, described above. Recent structural data for CBS domains of ClC-1 has enabled us to refine and re-evaluate our model of ClC-1 CBS domains and the mode of nucleotide binding. Firstly, Meyer and Dutzler (31) have resolved the structure of the CBS domains of ClC-0 providing strong support for many features of our ClC-1 CBS domain model, in particular the positioning of His-847 and Leu-848 at the mouth of the cleft between CBS-1 and -2. This structure does not, however, tell us anything about ATP binding as there were no nucleotides bound. Indeed ClC-0 appears not to bind nucleotides (31). More recently, however, Meyer and colleagues have resolved the structure of CBS domains from ClC-5 with nucleotides bound (32). ATP and AMP were resolved bound in the central cleft between the two CBS domains of ClC-5 (32) as we predicted for ClC-1 (24) but on the opposite side of the cleft to our prediction.
To investigate the implications of these structures for nucleotide binding in ClC-1, we built a new model of the CBS domains of ClC-1 by homology to the ClC-0 structure, PDB code 2D4Z (31), as ClC-0 is the closest homolog of ClC-1 with
70% identical residues in the CBS regions. Although very similar to our earlier model (24), there were a number of significant changes in the new model, including a slight reorientation of the two CBS domains relative to each other and extension of the model both into the loop between CBS-1 and -2 and at the N terminus, considerably restructuring a loop bounding the central cleft. Docking of AMP, as described previously (24), to this new model indicated that binding was feasible on either side of the central cleft (Fig. 4), with one orientation closely matching that from docking to our earlier model (24) and the other orientation closely matching that of AMP or ATP bound to CBS domains of ClC-5 (31). The latter orientation was not feasible in our earlier model due to partial occlusion of the cleft by the shorter N-terminal loop. The two orientations appear equally consistent with our experimental evidence showing the importance of His-847 and Leu-848 for modulation of ClC-1 by ATP (24), because they both have similar interactions with these centrally located residues but from opposite sides (Fig. 4). Interestingly, a very recently resolved structure of CBS domains from AMP-activated protein kinase (33) reveals nucleotides bound in a similar manner to that seen in ClC-5, despite minimal sequence similarity. Such similarities in distantly related proteins support a conserved mode of nucleotide binding by CBS domains, but this remains to be specifically confirmed for ClC-1.
The Role of Histidine Residues in CBS2—Next we investigated the hypothesis that histidine side chains, having the most appropriate pKa, are likely contenders for the proton acceptors mediating the effect of pH on ATP modulation of ClC-1 common gating. Previously we used molecular modeling to identify His-847 in CBS2 of ClC-1 for mutational studies and showed it is a critical residue for ATP modulation of ClC-1 (24). Based on this original model, we proposed that this residue may interact with the ribose moiety of bound ATP (24), but it also may be in appropriate proximity to interact electrostatically, when protonated, with the phosphates of bound ATP. In our new model, with an alternative ATP binding position (Fig. 4), this electrostatic interaction remains feasible. To test this possible interaction, we examined the pH and ATP sensitivity of mutants of H847 (Fig. 5). Mutation of His-847 to alanine (His-847
Ala) essentially abolished the effect of lowering pHi on the voltage dependence of common gating, although there was a slight increase in the minimum open probability when pHi was increased to 7.9 (Fig. 5B and Table 1). The His-847
Ala mutation also essentially abolished the effect of ATP on the V
of common gating at pH 7.2, as shown previously (24), and reduced the effect of ATP by >80% at pH 6.2 (Fig. 5B and Table 1). These results demonstrate that His-847 is a critical residue for the effects of both protons and ATP on common gating by, consistent with it being involved in the binding of both ligands. As the independent effects of either protons or ATP are eliminated by the His-847
Ala mutation, no specific conclusions can be reached about the role of His-847 in mediating the synergistic effects of both together, in particular via electrostatic interaction between protonated His-847 and the phosphates of ATP.
|
|
Ala, the His-847
Arg mutation effectively eliminated the effect of ATP on common gating at pH 7.2 and greatly reduced its effect at pH 6.2 (Fig. 5C and Table 1). At pH 7.2 the V
of common gating for the His-847
Arg mutant was shifted to more positive potentials, relative to wt, but this shift could not be attributed to the positive charge of the arginine side chain, as a similar shift was seen with the His-847
Ala mutant (Fig. 5B and Table 1). Somewhat surprisingly, a decrease in pHi to 6.2 shifted the common gating curve for the His-847
Arg mutant to more negative voltages, whereas both low and high pHi (pH 7.9) increased the minimum Po (Fig. 5C and Table 1), reversing the effects of pH changes in wt ClC-1. These results reiterate the important role of His-847 in both ATP and proton modulation of ClC-1 common gating. The His-847
Arg mutation does not, however, reproduce the effects of a decrease in pHi on wt channels, thus failing to provide any direct support for our hypothesis of an electrostatic interaction between a protonated His-847 and the phosphates of ATP. Conversely, these results do not directly refute our hypothesis as the arginine side chain is not a perfect mimic of a protonated His-847.
Another histidine residue in CBS-2 of ClC-1, His-835, has been shown to affect the voltage dependence of common gating when mutated to an arginine (25), and is predicted by our CBS domain model to be on the same face of CBS-2 as His-847 but too far from the putative ATP-binding site to directly interact with bound ATP (24). To test whether this histidine residue also contributes to pH or ATP modulation of common gating, we measured the effect of pHi and ATP on a His-835
Ala mutant. The His-835
Ala mutation shifted the V
of common gating at pH 7.2 by +43 ± 4 mV (Fig. 6 and Table 1). This result contrasts with a previous report that a His-835
Ala mutation had no significant effect on the V
of overall channel gating, whereas a His-835
Arg mutation shifted V
by
60 mV (25). The explanation for this discrepancy is not clear, but it may be due to the use of different expression systems. We found that common gating of the His-835
Ala mutant was unaffected by a decrease in pHi from 7.2 to 6.2 (Fig. 6B and Table 1), indicating that His-835 makes a significant contribution to the effect of acidosis on common gating in wt ClC-1. The voltage dependence of common gating for the His-835
Ala mutant at pHi 7.9 was similar to that for wt ClC-1, but, because of the shift in V
at pH 7.2 due to the His-835
Ala mutation, the effect of an increase in pHi from 7.2 to 7.9 is reversed in the His-835
Ala mutant, relative to wt. Despite the effects of the His-835
Ala mutation on pHi modulation of common gating, it had essentially no effect on ATP modulation (Fig. 6B and Table 1). At pH 7.2, 1 mM ATP shifted the V
of common gating in the His-835
Ala mutant by +25 ± 3 mV, which is not significantly different to wt. As for wt (Fig. 4), acidosis to pHi 6.2 markedly enhanced the effect of 1 mM ATP on common gating in the His-835
Ala mutant, shifting the voltage dependence to the point that it did not show saturation by +100 mV (Fig. 6B, best fit of Boltzmann gives V
of +67 mV). Finally, a limited dose-response curve for ATP suggests that, at pHi 6.2, the His-835
Ala mutation does not affect the ATP sensitivity of common gating (Fig. 6C). Mutation of a nearby residue S651A, in the cleft between the two CBS domains, had no significant effect on ClC-1 gating or modulation by either ATP (24) or pH (data not shown), supporting the specificity of the mutant effects described above.
Taken together these data demonstrate firstly that at least two protonatable residues, His-847 and His-835, are important in the effect of intracellular acidosis on ClC-1 common gating. Secondly, they show that the His-835
Ala mutation separates the independent and ATP-potentiating effects of acidosis, abolishing the effect of acidosis alone while retaining ATP-potentiating effect. Thus, the enhanced effect of ATP with acidosis is due primarily to a mechanism other than allosteric cooperativity between the independent effects of ATP and protons. His-847 is clearly important for the independent effects of both protons and ATP and may also be important for the cooperative interactions between the two.
|
) and closing (
) rate constants of the common gate. To calculate these rates, time constants were fitted to the time course of current activation, between 0 and 100 mV, and deactivation, between -140 and -40 mV (Fig. 7A). Deactivating currents were well fit with two exponential components, with the slower of these assumed to correspond to common gating. For activating currents at positive voltages, this should reduce to a single exponential, because protopore gating should be too fast to resolve in macroscopic current activation (14), but there was some indication of a second slow exponential component that may represent a third gating process or multiple closed states of the common gate (23, 29). Because the two components could not be assigned to particular gating transitions, the analysis was simplified by fitting the time course with a single exponential, assumed to represent the common gate (23). The apparent opening (
) and closing (
) rate constants were calculated from the time constants for current deactivation and activation (
) and the open probability Po using Equations 4 and 5 (28).
|
) shows a biphasic dependence on voltage (Fig. 7B), with a positive voltage dependence at positive voltages that reverses to a negative voltage dependence at very negative voltages, while the closing rate constant (
) showed a monotonic negative voltage dependence over the entire voltage range tested (Fig. 7C), similar to previous reports for protopore gating of ClC-0 (34) and, more recently, for common gating of ClC-1 (23, 35). At very negative voltages, the voltage dependence of the opening and closing rates were similar, explaining the voltage independence and non-zero minimum observed for the open probability at these voltages (23, 34).
|
) to account the chloride dependence of gating (34). Although we have not tested chloride dependence here, others have shown recently that the opening rate of ClC-1 common gating has a similar chloride dependence to that of ClC-0 protopore gating (35), suggesting that the kinetic scheme of Chen and Miller (34) also provides a good description for many characteristics of ClC-1 common gating. Consequently we will use this model to investigate the mechanism behind our results, but as all of our experiments were performed at high external [Cl-] of 152 mM, well above the Cl- equilibrium constant of 17 mM for ClC-1 common gating (35), we can ignore the portion of this scheme without chloride bound (in gray text, Fig. 8). Because the Cl- gating charge moves through the open channel, gating via this scheme is an inherently non-equilibrium process, leading to great difficulties in assigning closing rate data to particular transitions (34).
At pH 7.2, the primary effect of ATP on the common gating rate constants is to reduce the apparent opening rate (
) relatively uniformly across the whole voltage range (Fig. 7B) with essentially no effect on the closing rate (
) (Fig. 7C). Although ATP appears to have some effect on the voltage dependence (slope) of the opening rate curves and the relative weighting of the two components, these effects are minor relative to the overall shift to lower rates. In the absence of ATP, an increase in [H+] from pH 7.2 to 6.2 had a similar effect to ATP on the opening rate, although of slightly smaller magnitude, with again no significant effect on the closing rate (Fig. 7C). These data indicate that in the context of the gating scheme (Fig. 8), the independent effects of either ATP or protons can be largely explained by each ligand binding with higher affinity to the closed state C0 relative to other states (in gray box, Fig. 8), stabilizing and shifting the equilibrium toward this state. If we then examine the effect on the opening rate of increased [H+] and ATP together, it is clear that the curve at pH 6.2 plus 1 mM ATP is shifted largely uniformly to lower opening rates in a manner that is essentially additive of the effects of protons and ATP alone, consistent with each ligand acting independently, but this is insufficient to explain the greatly enhanced shift in V
due to the synergistic action of [H+] and ATP together.
The monotonic voltage dependence of the closing rate at pH 7.2 is essentially unaffected by a shift to pH 6.2 or addition of ATP (Fig. 7C), but ATP and acidosis together result in an unusual biphasic voltage dependence, such that the closing rate is markedly increased at positive voltages, becoming almost voltage-independent. The closing rate
is calculated as
= (1 - Po)/
, but there was no significant difference in the effect on
of acidosis and ATP together versus either of these factors alone (data not shown). Consequently, the differential effect of acidosis and ATP together on the voltage dependence of the closing rate is entirely due to their effect on Po and suffers from the errors in Po measurements from incomplete curves due to voltage limitations. Hence, we can conclude that the individual inhibitory effects of protons and ATP on common gating are due to stabilization of the closed state but that the synergistic effects of protons and ATP together appear to involve an extra mechanism that affects the voltage dependence of the closing rate. The practical experimental limits on the voltage range of our measurements preclude a more precise characterization of this extra mechanism.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
7.0 but may fall as low as 6.2-6.4 during intense activity (36-40) and recovers over a time course of
20-25 min (41-43). In our experiments, with 5 mM ATP, the normal level in resting or moderately exercising muscle, a reduction of pHi of this magnitude markedly shifted the voltage dependence of ClC-1 common gating to more positive potentials, inhibiting ClC-1 activity by reducing its open probability across the physiological voltage range. Inhibition of ClC-1 by low intracellular pH in the presence of ATP is therefore likely to be the molecular mechanism underlying the reduction in sarcolemmal chloride conductance with acidosis that leads to increased membrane excitability (10, 11).
During rest and moderate intensity exercise, a variety of homeostatic metabolic systems maintain ATP levels in skeletal muscle cells at close to 5 mM but during very intense exercise, ATP can be depleted in fast-twitch fiber types, where ClC-1 expression is highest (44), to <25% of resting levels within 25 s of intense activity (45). In the absence of any acidosis, this degree of ATP depletion would significantly relieve ATP inhibition of ClC-1, effectively activating ClC-1 and leading us to propose that this may reduce muscle excitability and contribute to fatigue while protecting muscles from metabolic exhaustion (24). Our current results show that acidosis, which would occur with any muscle activity sufficiently intense to deplete ATP levels, markedly increases the
V
caused by all concentrations of ATP and also appears to increase the apparent affinity for ATP. Even without any affinity change the enhanced
V
with acidosis, particularly for low ATP concentration, brings into question whether ATP depletion would ever return the V
to sufficiently negative potentials for the resulting activation of ClC-1 to play a physiologically significant role in contributing to fatigue. Such questions can only be answered when the combined effects of acidosis, ATP depletion, and membrane depolarization on membrane excitability are all considered in the context of active skeletal muscle tissue. Certainly, when the synergistic effects of acidosis and ATP on ClC-1 are taken into account, it appears likely that any reduction in excitability due to ATP depletion would occur via modulation of KATP channels (46) and ryanodine receptors (47) before any effect via modulation of ClC-1.
Although the shift in the V
of common gating to more positive voltages due to acidosis in the presence of ATP is the most physiologically relevant effect presented here, we also found a slight shift in the same direction with acidosis in the absence of ATP, contrary to previous studies that showed that reducing intracellular pH shifts voltage dependence, marginally, to more negative potentials (14, 29). One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the length of the conditioning pulse. Our results with shorter conditioning voltage pulses are consistent with earlier studies also employing short voltage pulses; that is, at pH 6.2 the voltage dependence of common gating is shifted to more negative potentials with respect to pH 7.2. When we used longer pulses to allow for the slowed current kinetics at low pH, however, the voltage dependence of common gating was shifted to more positive potentials. Another possible explanation for the positive shift of voltage dependence that we have observed with acidosis may be due to residual intracellular ATP. Because of the increased ATP sensitivity at low pH, even small amounts of ATP remaining in the cell after
5 min of dialysis against the ATP-free pipette solution would be expected to shift common gating to more positive potentials. Although experiments performed by Rychkov and co-authors were also in whole cell configuration, they studied the rat isoform o f ClC-1 expressed in Sf9 insect cells, where ATP regulation of ClC-1 may be different (15, 29). Accardi and Pusch studied ClC-1 pH sensitivity in inside-out membrane patches taken from Xenopus oocytes, where no ATP was present (14). Obviously more experiments are required to clarify whether the small positive shift in the voltage dependence of common gating that we observed at low pH is a direct effect of protonation of the channel or is due to low level binding of residual ATP.
We propose, based on mutational analysis and molecular modeling presented previously (24) and further developed here, that the effects of ATP on ClC-1 gating are due to direct binding of ATP to the C-terminal CBS domains of ClC-1. We now propose further, again based on mutational analysis presented here, that the modulation of ClC-1 gating by intracellular pH is due to direct protonation of histidine residues in the CBS domains and interaction of these residues with ATP binding. We cannot entirely rule out that these modulatory effects are mediated indirectly by other components of the intracellular milieu, but the mutational evidence, the interaction between ATP and pH modulation, and the structural resolution of nucleotide-binding sites in CBS domains combine to strongly favor direct modulation for both ATP and protons.
Base on our molecular modeling, together with three experimental findings presented here, the apparent pKa for the pH sensitivity of ClC-1 common gating being compatible with the protonation of histidine residues, the increased effect of ATP with acidosis, and the lack of any increased effect of adenosine, which lacks phosphate groups, we hypothesize that the increased apparent affinity for ATP may be due to electrostatic interactions between protonated His-847 and the phosphates of ATP. Consistent with this hypothesis, as well as abolishing the effect of ATP at pH 7.2 (24), mutations of His-847 also abolished the effect of acidosis in the absence of ATP and greatly attenuated the effect of ATP and acidosis together. We have not been able to provide any more direct support for this hypothesis, because our attempt to mimic protonation of His-847 with a His-847
Arg mutation failed to produce the same effect as acidosis. Interestingly, the ClC-5 residue equivalent to His-847 is an arginine, and although it is in reasonable proximity to the phosphates of bound ATP, it was not found to interact closely with these groups in the crystal structure (31).
Mutation of His-835, which has been shown to affect ClC-1 gating (25), was also found here to abolish the effect of acidosis on common gating, in the absence of ATP, but had essentially no effect on ATP modulation at pH 7.2 and only slightly reduced the enhanced effect of ATP with acidosis. The lack of effect of the His-835
Ala mutation on ATP modulation is consistent with its location in our model,
20 Å from His-847 and the putative ATP-binding site. Conversely, the similar effects of His-835
Ala and His-847
Ala mutations, in abolishing direct acidosis modulation of common gating, may be explained by these residues being on the same face of the CBS domain model, a face that may be important for modulation of gating by affecting CBS domain dimerization or interaction with the channel domain. Collectively these results demonstrate that mutations can separate the direct effect of acidosis, in the absence of ATP, and the potentiating effect of acidosis on ATP modulation, with both His-835 and His-847 contributing to the direct effect of acidosis but only His-847 being important for the ATP potentiating effect. These results are consistent with our hypothesis of an electrostatic interaction between the phosphates of ATP and protonated His-847, but, given that mutations of His-847 also abolish direct effects of ATP, we remain without any direct evidence that this interaction occurs and is responsible for the synergistic effects of acidosis and pH in inhibiting ClC-1.
To understand the underlying mechanism of pH and ATP modulation of ClC-1 common gating, we measured the effect of pH and ATP on kinetic parameters of gating relaxation and gating rate constants in the context of a simple two-state model. From this analysis, we could conclude that the individual inhibitory effects of protons and of ATP on common gating were due to stabilization of the closed state. The synergistic effects of protons and ATP together appeared to involve an extra mechanism affecting the voltage dependence of the closing rate. Practical experimental limits on the voltage range of our measurements precluded both a more precise characterization of this extra mechanism and any more detailed analysis of the underlying kinetics.
In summary, we have demonstrated that low intracellular pH and ATP act synergistically to inhibit ClC-1 chloride channels by shifting the voltage dependence of common gating to more positive potentials. Modulation of ClC-1 gating by pHi and ATP is therefore likely to be the molecular mechanism that underlies increased excitability in acidified skeletal muscle. The kinetics of these modulatory effects indicates that ATP and protons act independently by stabilizing the closed state of the common gate but also act cooperatively via a separate mechanism that involves alteration of the voltage dependence of the closing rate. His-847 in the C-terminal CBS domains of ClC-1 is a critical residue for the effects of both protons and ATP, consistent with our hypothesis that it contributes directly to a putative ATP-binding site. Further structural characterization will be required to determine the veracity of this hypothesis.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 An Australian Research Council Federation fellow. ![]()
2 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Present address: Howard Florey Institute and Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. Tel.: 61-3-8344-1849; Fax: 61-3-9347-0466; E-mail: brett.cromer{at}florey.edu.au.
3 The abbreviations used are: GCl, chloride conductance; pHi, intracellular pH; CBS, cystathionine
-synthase; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; wt, wild type. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|