Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M704896200 on September 20, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 47, 34139-34147, November 23, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/47/34139    most recent
M704896200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, C. H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, C. H. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Resistin Is a Key Mediator of Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (GIP) Stimulation of Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL) Activity in Adipocytes*Formula

Su-Jin Kim, Cuilan Nian, and Christopher H. S. McIntosh1

From the Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences and the Diabetes Research Group, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada

Received for publication, June 13, 2007 , and in revised form, September 10, 2007.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Studies on the physiological roles of the incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) have largely focused on its insulinotropic action and ability to regulate beta-cell mass. In previous studies on the stimulatory effect of GIP on adipocyte lipoprotein lipase (LPL), a pathway was identified involving increased phosphorylation of protein kinase B (PKB) and reduced phosphorylation of LKB1 and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). The slow time of onset of the responses suggested that GIP may have induced release of an intermediary molecule, and the current studies focused on the possible contribution of the adipokine resistin. In differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes, GIP, in the presence of insulin, increased resistin secretion through a pathway involving p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) and the stress-activated protein kinase/Jun amino-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK). The other major incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), exhibited no significant effects. Chronic elevation of circulating GIP levels in the Vancouver Diabetic Fatty (VDF) Zucker rat resulted in increases in circulating resistin levels and activation of p38 MAPK or SAPK/JNK in epididymal fat tissue, suggesting the existence of identical pathways in vivo as well as in vitro. Administration of resistin to 3T3-L1 adipocytes mimicked the effects of GIP on the PKB/LKB1/AMPK/LPL pathway: increasing phosphorylation of PKB, reducing levels of phosphorylated LKB1 and AMPK, and increasing LPL activity. Knockdown of resistin using RNA interference attenuated the effect of GIP on the PKB/LKB1/AMPK/LPL pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, supporting a role for resistin as a mediator.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)2 and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are the two major incretin hormones that potentiate glucose-stimulated insulin secretion during a meal (1–4). There is an extensive literature on the insulinotropic effects of the incretins and their ability to promote beta-cell proliferation and survival (1–6). Receptors for both GIP (GIPR) and GLP-1 have been shown to be expressed in tissues other than the pancreas, including adipose tissue (7–9), gastrointestinal tract (10, 11), and the brain (12, 13). As a result of the recent introduction of the GLP-1 agonist Exenatide and inhibitors of the incretin-degrading enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV as therapeutics for type 2 diabetes (14), considerable interest has developed in the non-beta-cell effects of the incretins.

There is strong evidence that GIP plays an important regulatory role in fat metabolism (7, 8, 15). During a meal, GIP is secreted in response to long chain fatty acids released from triglycerides (TGs) (16, 17). GIP promotes the clearance of chylomicron-associated TG from blood (18) and infusion of GIP lowers rat plasma TG responses to intraduodenal fat (19). A direct adipogenic role was suggested by the demonstrations of GIP enhancement of adipose tissue fatty acid synthesis from acetate (20) and its incorporation into triglyceride (21). The physiological importance of these effects was emphasized by the finding that GIPR knock-out mice demonstrated reduced adipose tissue accretion on feeding a high-fat diet (22).

In an earlier study we demonstrated that GIP increased lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity and TG accumulation in differentiated 3T3-L1 cells and human subcutaneous adipocytes through a pathway involving increased phosphorylation of protein kinase B (PKB) and decreases in LKB1 and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation (23). An anomaly of these studies was the slow time of onset of the responses, suggesting that GIP may have acted through release of an intermediary molecule. Recently, Hansotia and co-workers (24) administered the long acting GIPR agonist, [D-Ala2]GIP, to mice and observed an increase in plasma resistin that was absent in GIPR null mice and was not mimicked by the longacting GLP-1 receptor agonist, exendin-4. We have now examined the possibility that specific actions of GIP are mediated through the direct regulation of resistin release at the level of the adipocyte, resulting in activation of PKB and increased LPL activity.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture—3T3-L1 cells (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in 25 mM glucose DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% newborn calf serum, 100 unit/ml penicillin G-sodium, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate. INS-1 cells (clone 832/13) were kindly provided by Dr. C. B. Newgard (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC). INS-1 (832/13) cells were cultured in 11 mM glucose RPMI 1640 (Sigma) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 50 µM beta-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 unit/ml penicillin G-sodium, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate.

Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Adipocytes—3T3-L1 cells were differentiated into the adipocyte phenotype as described previously (8). Briefly, 2 days after cells were confluent, medium was supplemented with dexamethasone (0.6 µM), 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (0.1 mM), and insulin (16 µM) for 72 h, after which cells were cultured in 25 mM glucose DMEM + 10% fetal calf serum for 7 further days. Differentiation of cells was confirmed by Oil Red-O staining and fully differentiated cells (>85% adipose cells) from passages 2 to 6 were used in all experiments.

Resistin ELISA (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay)—For studies on the effect of GIP or GLP-1 on the secretion of resistin, INS-1 beta-cells or 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with GIP or GLP-1 as indicated in the figure legends. The levels of resistin in the media were determined using a Resistin ELISA kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI).

Quantitative Real-time Reverse Transcriptase-PCR—Total RNA was extracted and cDNAs generated by reverse transcription. 100 ng of cDNA were used in the real-time PCR to measure resistin expression, whereas 10 ng of cDNA were used for the beta-actin internal control. The primer and probe sequences used for the amplification of resistin cDNA are as follows: forward primer, 5'-AACCTTTCATTTCCCCTCCTTTTC-3'; reverse primer, 5'-GGAAGCGACCTGCAGCTTACAGCA-3'; probe, 5'-FAM-AGTCTCCTCCAGAGGGAAGTTGG-3' TAMRA. All reactions followed the typical sigmoidal reaction profile, and cycle threshold was used as a measurement of amplicon abundance.

Western Blot Analysis—For studies on the effect of GIP or GLP-1 on intracellular resistin and protein kinase levels, INS-1 beta-cells or 3T3-L1 adipocytes were incubated with GIP or GLP-1, as indicated in the figure legends. Total cellular extracts from each sample were separated on a 13% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Probing of the membranes was performed with resistin (ProSci Inc., Poway, CA), phospho-p38 MAP kinase (threonine 180/tyrosine 182), p38 MAP kinase, phospho-p42/44 MAP kinase (threonine 202/tyrosine 204), p42/44 MAP kinase, phospho-SAPK/JNK (threonine 183/tyrosine 185), phospho-PKB (serine 473), PKB, phospho-LKB1 (serine 428), and phospho-AMPK (threonine 172), AMPK and beta-actin antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences) using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG secondary antibodies.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.
The effect of GIP and GLP-1 on the secretion of resistin. A, time course of GIP and GLP-1 action on resistin secretion. Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum starved in 3 mM glucose/DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin overnight and INS-1 (832/13) cells were serum starved in 3 mM glucose/RPMI containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin overnight. 3T3-L1 adipocytes and INS-1 cells were treated for the indicated periods of time with GIP or GLP-1 (100 nM) in the presence of insulin (1 nM). B, concentration dependence of GIP and GLP-1 effects on resistin secretion. 3T3-L1 adipocytes and INS-1 (832/13) cells were treated for 2 h with the indicated concentrations of GIP or GLP-1 in the presence of insulin (1 nM). Resistin levels in culture media were determined using resistin ELISA kit. C, the effect of GIP and GLP-1 on resistin mRNA expression. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated as described above and incubated with GIP or GLP-1 (100 nM) for 6 h in the presence of insulin (1 nM). Total RNA was isolated from each sample and real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR was performed to quantify resistin mRNA (Retn) levels; shown as the -fold difference versus control normalized to beta-actin expression levels. All data represent three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. Significance was tested using ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc test, where ** represents p < 0.05 versus control.

 
LPL Enzyme Activity Assays—The LPL activity assay kit (Roar Biomedical Inc., New York) was used to measure enzyme activity, according to the manufacturer's protocol. Enzyme activity is presented as relative activity normalized to protein concentration.

Knockdown of Resistin by RNA Interference—To reduce the synthesis and secretion of resistin, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were transfected with a pool of 3 siRNAs for resistin (sc-39723, Santa Cruz) using Lipofectamine 2000TM transfection reagent, and incubated for 72 h. The down-regulation of resistin protein by RNA interference was confirmed by Western blot hybridization using antibody against resistin.

In Vivo GIP Infusion and Measurements of Circulating Resistin Levels—Obese VDF rats and their lean littermate (12 weeks old) were subjected to a 2-week continuous infusion of GIP (10 pmol/kg min). The infusion was performed using an Alzet miniosmotic pump (Alzet Corp., Minneapolis, MN) implanted in the intraperitoneal region under pentobarbital (40 mg/kg) anesthesia. For the controls, phosphate-buffered saline vehicle-containing minipumps were implanted. Blood samples were taken at the indicated time points, and circulating plasma resistin levels were determined. Experiments were conducted in accordance with guidelines of the UBC Animal Care Committee and Canadian Council on Animal Care.


Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.
GIP increases phosphorylation of p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) and SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum starved in 3 mM glucose/DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin overnight and stimulated for the indicated periods of time with GIP or GLP-1 (100 nM) in the presence of insulin (1 nM). Effect of treatment with GIP (A, C, and E) or GLP-1 (B, D, and F) on phosphorylation of p42/44 MAPK Thr202/Tyr204 (A and B), p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (C and D), and SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (E and F). Densitomeric analysis of Thr180/Tyr182 p38 MAPK (G) and Thr183/Tyr185 SAPK/JNK (H) phosphorylation in response to GIP or GLP-1. Western blots are representative of n = 3 and significance was tested using ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc test, where * represents p < 0.05 versus basal.

 
Immunohistochemistry—Paraffin sections containing epididymal fat tissue were prepared from GIP-treated and control rats and subjected to immunostaining for resistin. The sections were visualized with Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody, and imaged using a Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope (Axioskop2).

Statistical Analysis—Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. with the number of individual experiments presented in the figure legends. Data were analyzed using the non-linear regression analysis program PRISM (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) and significance was tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Newman-Keuls hoc test (p < 0.05) as indicated in the figure legends.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
GIP, but Not GLP-1 Increases the Secretion of Resistin by 3T3-L1 Adipocytes—The effect of GIP and GLP-1 on the secretion of resistin in vitro was first examined in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Incubation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes with GIP (100 nM) in the presence of insulin (1 nM) for 2 h resulted in ~2.3-fold increases in resistin secretion, compared with control cells (Fig. 1A). Concentration-dependent effects of GIP on resistin secretion were observed with EC50 values of 9.6 ± 0.2 nM (Fig. 1B). In contrast, treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes with GLP-1 (100 nM) had no effect on resistin secretion. Additionally, although resistin was detectable in extracts from INS-1 (832/13) beta-cells, neither GIP nor GLP-1 affected secretion (Fig. 1, A and B).

GIP Increases Resistin (Retn) mRNA Expression in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes—Treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes (supplementary Fig. S1) or INS-1 beta-cells (supplementary Fig. S2) with GIP or GLP-1 (100 nM) was not found to alter resistin protein levels. One possible explanation for the lack of change in cell protein levels is that increases in expression only maintain sufficient newly synthesized resistin to support the increased secretion rate, without intracellular accumulation. To investigate this possibility, Retn mRNA levels were determined in 3T3-L1 adipocytes under basal and stimulated conditions. As shown in Fig. 1C, GIP in the presence of insulin, increased Retn mRNA levels, whereas GLP-1 had no effect. It is therefore likely that GIP-potentiated resistin secretion resulted from increased expression.

GIP Increases Phosphorylation of p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182)) and Stress-activated Protein Kinase/Jun Amino-terminal Kinase (SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185)) in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes—Signaling modules potentially involved in GIP-mediated resistin secretion were next studied. Because resistin secretion was evident within 1 h following GIP treatment, we first examined faster acting MAPK signaling modules, including p42/44 MAPK, p38 MAPK, and SAPK/JNK. There was no significant effect of GIP or GLP-1 on the levels of phosphorylated p42/44 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes during the time course of the study (Fig. 2, A and B). On the other hand, GIP, in the presence of insulin, was found to increase phosphorylation of p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) transiently, peaking at 5–10 min (Fig. 2, C and G), and SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) in a more sustained manner (Fig. 2, E and H), whereas GLP-1 was without effect on either kinase (Fig. 2, D and F–H). There were no significant changes in the phosphorylation of p42/44 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204), p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182), or SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) with either treatment of insulin (1 nM) or GIP (100 nM) alone (supplementary Fig. S3). These results indicate that synergistic action between insulin and GIP is required for phosphorylation.


Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3.
p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK are involved in GIP-mediated resistin secretion. A, effect of inhibiting p38 MAPK or SAPK/JNK on resistin secretion. Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum starved in 3 mM glucose/DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin overnight and stimulated for 2 h with 100 nM GIP in the presence or absence of inhibitors of MAPK pathways. PD98059 (75 µM), U0126 (25 µM), SB203580 (10 µM), and SP600125 (50 µM) were added to cells during 1 h preincubation as well as during GIP stimulation. Resistin levels in the culture media were determined using a resistin ELISA. B, effect of p38 MAPK or SAPK/JNK inhibition on resistin protein levels. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated as described above, total cellular extracts were isolated from each sample and resistin was determined by Western blotting. All data represent three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate and Western blots are representative of n = 3. Significance was tested using ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc test, where ** represents p < 0.05 versus control; ## represents p < 0.05 versus control + GIP.

 
p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK Are Involved in GIP-mediated Resistin Secretion—In studies designed to examine the involvement of p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK in GIP-mediated resistin secretion, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were incubated in the presence or absence of selective inhibitors of MAPK pathways. There was no significant effect on GIP-mediated resistin secretion by treatment with the MAP kinase kinase (MEK) 1/2 inhibitors, PD098059 (75 µM) or U0126 (25 µM). However, resistin secretion in response to GIP was greatly reduced by the p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580, and the SAPK/JNK inhibitor, SP600125 (50 µM) (Fig. 3A). There were no significant differences in cellular resistin levels following treatment with these inhibitors (Fig. 3B). These results strongly suggest that p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK, but not ERK1/2, are involved in GIP-mediated resistin secretion in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and that changes in protein expression are not involved.


Figure 4
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 4.
Effect of GIP on resistin levels in vivo. VDF rats and their lean littermate controls received a 2-week continuous infusion of GIP (10 pmol/kg/min) or phosphate-buffered saline vehicle. A, resistin expression in epididymal fat tissue. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using resistin antibody and imaging performed using a Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope (Axioskop2). B, the effect of GIP infusion on circulating plasma resistin levels. Following a 2-week GIP infusion, plasma samples were taken from each group of animals, and plasma resistin levels determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." C, the effect of GIP infusion on resistin expression in epididymal fat tissue. Total cellular extracts were prepared from epididymal fat tissues and Western blot analyses performed using antibodies against resistin and beta-actin. D and E, the effect of GIP on kinase phosphorylation. Western blot analyses were performed using antibodies against p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (D), SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (E), and beta-actin. All imaging data were analyzed using the Northern Eclipse program (version 6) and the scale bar indicates 50 µm. Data represent three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate and Western blots are representative of n = 3. Significance was tested using ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc test, where ** represents p < 0.05 versus lean; ## represents p < 0.05 versus fatty.

 
The Effect of GIP on Epididymal Fat in Vivo—To determine whether GIP can regulate resistin secretion in vivo, peptide was systemically administrated to lean (Fa/?) or obese (fa/fa) VDF Zucker rats, using osmotic minipumps and conditions previously shown to increase adipose tissue LPL levels (23). Resistin was shown to be expressed in epididymal fat tissue of lean and obese VDF Zucker rats (Fig. 4A), and 2 weeks continuous infusion of low concentrations of GIP (10 pmol/kg/min) resulted in increased circulating resistin levels (Fig. 4B), but no detectable change in resistin protein levels in epididymal fat tissue (Fig. 4C). However, GIP infusion did increase tissue levels of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) and SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) in both lean and obese animals, when compared with controls (Fig. 4, D and 4E). These results correlate well with the in vitro results in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and support a role for GIP in the regulation of resistin secretion in vivo, acting through a p38 MAPK and JNK/SAPK signaling module.

Resistin Modulates PKB/LKB1/AMPK Phosphorylation and LPL Activity—Next, we examined the functional implications of GIP-mediated resistin secretion. In the earlier study, we demonstrated that GIP increased LPL activity and TG accumulation through a pathway involving increased phosphorylation of PKB and reductions in phosphorylated LKB1 and AMPK (23). Responses to GIP under these conditions were relatively slow and the possible involvement of an intermediary could not be excluded. We therefore tested whether resistin could act as a mediator of the action of GIP on adipocytes. Treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes with resistin (10 nM) mimicked the effects of GIP, resulting in increased levels of phosphorylated PKB (Ser473), and decreased levels of LKB1 (Ser428) and AMPK (Thr172) (Figs. 5, A–C). In control experiments, there were no significant changes in levels of phosphorylated PKB (Ser473), LKB1 (Ser428), or AMPK (Thr172) during the time course of the study, confirming that these effects were GIP-dependent (supplementary Fig. S4). Treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes with resistin (10 nM) for 12 h resulted in a ~3.4-fold increase in LPL activity, compared with control (Fig. 5D) and concentration-dependent effects of resistin on LPL activity were observed with EC50 values of 15.8 ± 0.2 nM (Fig. 5E). Taken together, these results suggest that resistin could be an important mediator of GIP stimulation of LPL activity.

Resistin Knockdown Greatly Reduces the Effect of GIP on the PKB/LKB1/AMPK/LPL Cascade—To evaluate further the functional contribution of resistin secretion to GIP effects on the PKB/LKB1/AMPK/LPL cascade, resistin was knocked down by RNA interference treatment. As shown in Fig. 6, A and B, 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with 100 nM of a pool of 3 resistin siRNAs resulted in greatly reduced resistin protein levels and an approximate 65 and 75% reduction in basal- and GIP-stimulated resistin secretion, respectively. The reduction in GIP-mediated responses was associated with attenuation of the effects of GIP on phosphorylation of PKB, LKB1, and AMPK (Fig. 6, C–E). These results complement the finding that resistin treatment resulted in decreased levels of phosphorylated LKB1 and AMPK (Fig. 5, B and C). Furthermore, GIP-mediated LPL activation was also greatly reduced in resistin RNA interference-treated cells (Fig. 6F), supporting a role for resistin as a mediator of GIP-mediated increases in LPL activity.


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 5.
Effect of resistin on phosphorylation of PKB, LKB1 and AMPK, and LPL activity. Time course of phosphorylation of PKB (A), LKB1 (B), and AMPK (C) in the presence of resistin. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum starved in 3 mM glucose/DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin overnight and stimulated for the indicated periods of time with resistin (10 nM). Total cellular extracts were isolated and Western blot analyses performed with antibodies against phosphorylated Thr172-AMPK, AMPK, Ser428-LKB1, Ser473-PKB or PKB, and beta-actin. Time course (D) and concentration-response effect (E) of resistin on LPL activity. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated for the indicated periods of time with resistin (10 nM) (A–D) or for 24 h with the indicated concentrations of resistin (E). Western blots are representative of n = 3 and significance was tested using ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc test, where * represents p < 0.05 versus basal.

 
Basal phospho-LKB1 and AMPK levels appeared to be slightly increased in RNA interference-treated cells in the absence of GIP (Fig. 6, D and E). Basal phospho-PKB levels were undetectable. However, resistin may normally maintain a pool of PKB in the phosphorylated state, thus suppressing levels of phospho-LKB1 and AMPK, with loss of resistin removing this constraint. Because GIP-treated cells showed both a reduction in phospho-LKB1/AMPK and a small increase in LPL, there is likely an alternative pathway by which it can act.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Since its identification as an adipocyte-secreted protein (25, 26), there has been controversy over the physiological roles played by resistin (adipocyte secreted factor). Because resistin administration to C57BL/6J mice resulted in glucose intolerance and reduced insulin sensitivity, whereas anti-resistin serum improved insulin resistance, it was suggested that resistin was the long sought after link between obesity and type 2 diabetes (25). Resistin levels were found to be markedly elevated in serum from insulin resistant mice placed on a high-fat diet and in obese rats and mice (25). Subsequently a number of groups reported a reduction in resistin expression in white adipose tissue from a number of obese rodent models including ob/ob, db/db, tub/tub, and KKA (y) mice (27–29). Despite this, elevated serum resistin levels were found in high-fat fed or monogenic obese mice (28), similar to the elevated levels observed in the obese VDF Zucker rats.

A number of studies have shown that resistin can act in an autocrine/paracrine manner in white adipocytes, although its actual role is obscure. Resistin mRNA is undetectable in 3T3-L1 cell preadipocytes, but its expression increases during differentiation to the adipocyte phenotype (30). Addition of recombinant resistin, or increasing resistin expression via gene transfection promoted differentiation of preadipocytes to adipocytes. Conflicting results have been reported for resistin effects on mature adipocytes. Fat-specific overexpression of resistin in a spontaneously hypertensive rat model was found to impair reesterification of free fatty acids to triglycerides (31), whereas treatment of mouse adipose explants with recombinant FIZZ3, the human resistin equivalent, resulted in increases in both lipolysis and reesterification (32). Resistin can also inhibit insulin-induced glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (25). Resistin is additionally expressed in both human and mouse pancreatic islets (33), and exogenous resistin impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in isolated islets (34), although its physiological islet function is unknown.


Figure 6
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 6.
The effects of resistin knockdown using siRNA on GIP-mediated changes in phosphorylation of PKB, LKB1, and AMPK, and LPL activity. Concentration-dependent effects of RNA interference-mediated resistin knock-down on resistin protein levels (A) and secretion (B). 3T3-L1 adipocytes were transfected with resistin or control scrambled siRNAs (100 nM) and treated with GIP (100 nM) plus insulin (1 nM). Western blot analyses were performed using antibodies against resistin (A) and resistin levels in culture media were determined using resistin ELISA kit (B). Effect of resistin knockdown using siRNA on kinase phosphorylation. Western blot analyses were performed using antibodies against phospho-Ser473-PKB (C), phospho-Ser428-LKB1 (D), or phospho-Thr172-AMPK (E) and beta-actin. F, effect of resistin siRNA treatment on LPL activity. All data represent three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. Significance was tested using ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc test, where ** represents p < 0.05 versus control, ## represents p < 0.05 versus control + GIP.

 
We showed previously that GIP, in the presence of insulin, increased LPL enzyme activity and triglyceride accumulation, through a pathway involving increased phosphorylation of PKB and reductions in the phosphorylated forms of LKB1 and AMPK (23). Unlike GIP action on PKB in INS-1 beta-cells (5), responses in 3T3-L1 adipocytes demonstrated a slow time of onset, suggesting responses involved release of an intermediary molecule that acted upstream of PI3K/PKB (Fig. 7). The present results suggest that resistin is a major contributor to the lipogenic effects of GIP in 3T3-L1 adipocytes because it induced identical changes in PKB, LKB1, and AMPK (Fig. 5). Knockdown of resistin using RNA interference resulted in attenuation of the effects of GIP (Fig. 6). The incomplete abolition of the effects of GIP is likely due to the involvement of other growth factors and/or hormones secreted by adipocytes.

The current studies therefore provide a plausible explanation for the delayed responses to GIP: increased secretion and actions of resistin (Fig. 7). There are several ways by which GIP could have produced an increase in resistin secretion. It is unlikely to be through a major effect on resistin stores, because neither resistin levels in 3T3-L1 adipocytes nor those in INS-1 (832/13) beta-cells were influenced by GIP treatment (Figs. 2 and 3), even with incubation periods of up to 6 h. There have been only few previous studies on in vitro adipocyte resistin secretion. In 3T3-L1 cells, extended (24 h) incubation with insulin stimulated resistin secretion (35), whereas insulin-like growth factor-I (36) and endothelin-1 (35) reduced secretion. GIP-induced resistin secretion peaked within ~2 h. Wide variability in the patterns of adipokine secretion have been described in the literature, with a slow linear release of leptin over 24 h under unstimulated conditions (37), but acute secretory responses of leptin (38, 39) and adiponectin (40) to insulin, and of proinflammatory adipokines to tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (41). The cellular mechanisms underlying secretion of the adipokines are still largely undefined. Following biosynthesis, leptin undergoes trafficking through the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi network to reside in the limited cytoplasmic space surrounding the fat droplets (39, 42). A fraction of adipocyte leptin appears to be localized in small vesicles (39, 42, 43). It is therefore possible that resistin also resides in intracellular vesicles and that GIP stimulates their production and secretion, as proposed for leptin (44). In the present study, although GIP was shown to stimulate resistin secretion, there was no detectable effect on the levels of resistin protein in either acute experiments on 3T3-L1 adipocytes or in vivo in VDF rats. A potential explanation for this observation is that GIP increases resistin expression so as to maintain sufficient newly synthesized protein to support the increased secretion rate, without intracellular accumulation. This possibility was supported by the finding that GIP treatment resulted in increased Retn mRNA expression (Fig. 1C). In studies designed to identify signaling pathways responsible for GIP-induced resistin secretion, we established p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK as potential targets (Fig. 2, G and H). Interestingly, increased phosphorylation of p38 MAPK was rapid, but transient, whereas increases in SAPK/JNK did not reach peak levels until 1 h. This may explain why GIP-induced resistin secretion is maximal at 1–2 h following initiation of stimulation. As discussed previously (23), low concentrations of insulin were included in all the studies because it is essential for the stimulatory effect of GIP on LPL activity and triglyceride synthesis. Under these conditions the ability of GIP to stimulate adenylyl cyclase and activate protein kinase A is blocked. It is therefore unlikely that cyclic AMP-mediated pathways contributed to the stimulation of secretion. A pharmacological approach was taken to confirm the kinase pathways involved. Application of MEK inhibitors did not influence resistin secretion, whereas inhibition of either SAPK/JNK or p38 MAP kinase greatly reduced secretion. Exactly where in the secretory pathway these kinases act is currently unknown. An additional uncertainty is the exact mechanism by which resistin acts in the adipocyte. As previously discussed (23), application of the pharmacological inhibitors of PI3K, LY294002, and wortmannin resulted in reduced phosphorylated LKB1/AMPK strongly suggesting that PKB at least partially mediated these effects of GIP (23). The responses to resistin shown in the current studies did not reveal a definitive temporal relationship between PKB phosphorylation and reduced LKB1/AMPK, possibly due to close intracellular interaction between these enzymes. It has been shown that resistin increases phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in cultured human endothelial cells (45) and aortic smooth muscle (46), whereas the ability of resistin to impair insulin-receptor phosphorylation has been attributed to increasing gene expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (47). Resistin also induced a transient increase in phospho-PKB in endothelial cells (48), although studies on resistin null ob/ob mice indicated that resistin normally suppressed PKB phosphorylation in skeletal muscle and liver. Importantly, as found in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, resistin treatment reduced AMPK phosphorylation in both the liver (49, 50) and skeletal muscle (51), and this may be a key intermediate molecule in resistin action. There are therefore clearly cell type-specific responses to resistin and the mechanistic link between PKB activation and reduced LKB1/AMPK phosphorylation remains to be clarified.


Figure 7
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 7.
Proposed pathway by which GIP increases resistin secretion and LPL activity in adipocytes. GIP receptor interaction results in activation of p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK, leading to the secretion of resistin. Secreted resistin acts in either an autocrine or paracrine manner to increase PKB phosphorylation and decrease LKB1 and AMPK phosphorylation, resulting in increased LPL activity. There is the potential for involvement of other growth factors/hormones in the regulatory pathway.

 
Finally, what are the implications of these studies for the regulation of human resistin. There is only moderate sequence homology (~53%) in coding and noncoding regions between mouse and human resistin (FIZZ3) (52). Additionally, although recent studies have confirmed that FIZZ3 is expressed in human adipocytes (53), monocytes/macrophages within adipose tissue express much higher levels, raising doubt as to its role in human adipose tissue (54). However, resistin/FIZZ3 originating from immune cells could still play an important paracrine function in the regulation of adipocyte development and function. In view of the increasing evidence linking chronic inflammation in fat with the development of insulin resistance and type II diabetes (55, 56) it will be important to establish whether there is a similar enteroadipocyte axis involving GIP and resistin/FIZZ3 in human fat.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by grants to C.H.S.M. from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

Formula The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1–S4. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada. Tel.: 604-822-3088; Fax: 604-822-6048; E-mail: mcintoch{at}interchange.ubc.ca.

2 The abbreviations used are: GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GIPR, GIP receptor; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PKB, protein kinase B; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; VDF, Vancouver Diabetic Fatty; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; p38 MAPK, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; SAPK/JNK, stress-activated protein kinase/Jun amino-terminal kinase; TG, triglyceride(s); ANOVA, analysis of variance; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; siRNA, small interfering RNA; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. C. B. Newgard (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina) for kindly providing INS-1 cells (clone 832/13).



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Pederson, R. A., and McIntosh, C. H. S. (2004) in Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases, (Martini, L., ed) Vol. 2, pp. 202-207, Elsevier Inc., New York
  2. Meier, J. J., and Nauck, M. A. (2005) Diabetes-Metab. Res. Rev. 21, 91-117[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Drucker, D. J. (2006) Cell Metab. 3, 153-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Drucker, D. J. (2007) J. Clin. Investig. 117, 24-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kim, S. J., Winter, K., Nian, C., Tsuneoka, M., Koda, Y., and McIntosh, C. H. S. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 22297-22307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Brubaker, P. L., and Drucker, D. J. (2004) Endocrinology 145, 2653-2659[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Yip, R. G., Boylan, M. O., Kieffer, T. J., and Wolfe, M. M. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 4004-4007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. McIntosh, C. H. S., Bremsak, I., Lynn, F. C., Gill, R., Hinke, S. A., Gelling, R., McKnight, G., Jaspers, S., and Pederson, R. A. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 398-404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Montrose-Rafizadeh, C., Yang, H., Wang, Y., Roth, J., Montrose, M. H., and Adams, L. G. (1997) J. Cell. Physiol. 172, 275-283[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mayo, K. E., Miller, L. J., Bataille, D., Dalle, S., Goke, B., Thorens, B., and Drucker, D. J. (2003) Pharmacol. Rev. 55, 167-194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tappenden, K. A., Thomson, A. B., Wild, G. E., and McBurney, M. I. (1996) J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 20, 357-362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Nyberg, J., Anderson, M. F., Meister, B., Alborn, A. M., Strom, A. K., Brederlau, A., Illerskog, A. C., Nilsson, O., Kieffer, T. J., Hietala, M. A., Ricksten, A., and Eriksson, P. S. (2005) J. Neurosci. 25, 1816-1825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Alvarez, E., Martinez, M. D., Roncero, I., Chowen, J. A., Garcia-Cuartero, B., Gispert, J. D., Sanz, C., Vazquez, P., Maldonado, A., de Caceres, J., Desco, M., Pozo, M. A., and Blazquez, E. (2005) J. Neurochem. 92, 798-806[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Drucker, D. J., and Nauck, M. A. (2006) Lancet 368, 1696-1705[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Morgan, L. M. (1996) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24, 585-591[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Brown, J. C., Buchan, A. M., McIntosh, C. H. S., and Pederson, R. A. (1989) in Handbook of Physiology (Schultz, S. G., Makhlouf, G. M., and Rauner, B. B., eds) pp. 403-430, American Physiology Society, Bethesda, MD
  17. Pederson, R. A. (1993) in Gut Peptides: Biochemistry and Physiology (Walsh, J., and Dockray, G., eds) pp. 217-259, Raven Press, New York
  18. Wasada, T., McCorkle, K., Harris, V., Kawai, K., Howard, B., and Unger, R. H. (1981) J. Clin. Investig. 68, 1106-1107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ohneda, A., Kobayashi, T., and Nihei, J. (1984) Regul. Pept. 8, 123-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Oben, J., Morgan, L., Fletcher, J., and Marks, V. (1991) J. Endocrinol. 130, 267-272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Beck, B., and Max, J. P. (1983) Regul. Pept. 7, 3-8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Miyawaki, K., Yamada, Y., Ban, N., Ihara, Y., Tsukiyama, K., Zhou, H., Fujimoto, S., Oku, A., Tsuda, K., Toyokuni, S., Hiau, H., Mizunoya, W., Fushiki, T., Holst, J. J., Makino, M., Tashita, A., Kobara, Y., Tsubamoto, Y., Jinnouchi, T., Jomori, T., and Seino, Y. (2002) Nat. Med. 8, 738-742[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Kim, S. J., Nian, C., and McIntosh, C. H. S. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 8557-8567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hansotia, T., Maida, A., Flock, G., Yamada, Y., Tsukiyama, K., Seino, Y., and Drucker, D. J. (2007) J. Clin. Investig. 117, 143-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Steppan, C. M., Bailey, S. T., Bhat, S., Brown, E. J., Banerjee, R. R., Wright, C. M., Patel, H. R., Ahima, R. S., and Lazar, M. A. (2001) Nature 409, 307-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Kim, K. H., Lee, K., Moon, Y. S., and Sul, H. S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11252-11256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Way, J. M., Gorgun, C. Z., Tong, Q., Uysal, K. T., Brown, K. K., Harrington, W. W., Oliver, W. R., Jr., Willson, T. M., Kliewer, S. A., and Hotamisligil, G. S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 25651-25653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Rajala, M. W., Qi, Y., Patel, H. R., Takahashi, N., Banerjee, R., Pajvani, U. B., Sinha, M. K., Gingerich, R. L., Scherer, P. E., and Ahima, R. S. (2004) Diabetes 53, 1671-1679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Maebuchi, M., Machidori, M., Urade, R., Ogawa, T., and Moriyama, T. (2003) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 416, 164-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Gong, H., Ni, Y., Guo, X., Fei, L., Pan, X., Guo, M., and Chen, R. (2004) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 150, 885-892[Abstract]
  31. Pravenec, M., Kazdova, L., Cahova, M., Landa, V., Zidek, V., Mlejnek, P., Simakova, M., Wang, J., Qi, N., and Kurtz, T. W. (2006) Int. J. Obesity 30, 1157-1159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Ort, T., Arjona, A. A., MacDougall, J. R., Nelson, P. J., Rothenberg, M. E., Wu, F., Eisen, A., and Halvorsen, Y. D. (2005) Endocrinology 146, 2200-2209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Minn, A. H., Patterson, N. B., Pack, S., Hoffmann, S. C., Gavrilova, O., Vinson, C., Harlan, D. M., and Shalev, A. (2003) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 310, 641-645[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Nakata, M., Okada, T., Ozawa, K., and Yada, T. (2007) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 353, 1046-1051[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Zhong, Q., Lin, C. Y., Clarke, K. J., Kemppainen, R. J., Schwartz, D. D., and Judd, R. L. (2002) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 296, 383-387[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Chen, Y. H., Hung, P. F., and Kao, Y. H. (2005) Am. J. Physiol. 288, E1019-E1027
  37. Skurk, T., Alberti-Huber, C., Herder, C., and Hauner, H. (2007) Endocrinology 92, 1023-1033
  38. Lee, M.-J., and Fried, S. K. (2006) J. Lipid Res. 47, 1984-1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Commisotto, P. G., Bukowiecki, L. J., Deshaies, Y., and Bendayan, M. (2006) Biochem. Cell Biol. 84, 207-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Pereira, R. I., and Deaznin, B. (2005) Metab. Clin. Exp. 54, 1636-1643[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Wang, B., and Trayhurn, P. (2006) Pflügers Arch. 452, 418-427[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Bornstein, S. R., Abu-Asab, M., Glasow, A., Päth, G., Hauner, H., Tsokos, M., Chrousos, G. P., and Scherbaum, W. A. (2000) Diabetes 49, 532-538[Abstract]
  43. Roh, C., Thoidis, G., Farmer, S. R., and Kandror, K. V. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, E893-E899
  44. Barr, V. A., Malide, D., Zarnowski, M. J., Taylor, S. I., and Cushman, S. W. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 4463-4472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mu, H., Ohashi, R., Yan, S., Chai, H., Yang, H., Lin, P., Yao, Q., and Chen, C. (2006) Cardiovasc. Res. 70, 146-157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Calabro, P., Samudio, I., Willerson, J. T., and Yeh, E. T. (2004) Circulation 110, 3335-3340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Steppan, C. M., Wang, J., Whiteman, E. L., Birnbaum, M. J., and Lazar, M. A. (2005) Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 1569-1575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Shen, Y. H., Zhang, L., Gan, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., LeMaire, S. A., Coselli, J. S., and Wang, X. L. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 7727-7736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Banerjee, R. R., Rangwala, S. M., Shapiro, J. S., Rich, A. S., Rhoades, B., Qi, Y., Wang, J., Rajala, M. W., Pocai, A., Scherer, P. E., Steppan, C. M., Ahima, R. S., Obici, S., Rossetti, L., and Lazar, M. A. (2004) Science 303, 1195-1198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Muse, E. D., Obici, S., Bhanot, S., Monia, B. P., McKay, R. A., Rajala, M. W., Scherer, P. E., and Rossetti, L. (2004) J. Clin. Investig. 114, 232-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Palanivel, R., and Sweeney, G. (2005) FEBS Lett. 579, 5049-5054[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Yang, R. Z., Huang, Q., Xu, A., McLenithan, J. C., Eisen, J. A., Shuldiner, A. R., Alkan, S., and Gong, D. W. (2003) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 310, 927-935[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. McTernan, P. G., Kusminski, C. M., and Kumar, S. (2006) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 17, 170-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Savage, D. B., Sewter, C. P., Klenk, E. S., Segal, D. G., Vidal-Puig, A., Considine, R. V., and O'Rahilly, S. (2001) Diabetes 50, 2199-2202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Xu, H., Barnes, G. T., Yang, Q., Tan, G., Yang, D., Chou, C. J., Sole, J., Nichols, A., Ross, J. S., Tartaglia, L. A., and Chen, H. (2003) J. Clin. Investig. 112, 1821-1830[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Hotamisligil, G. S. (2006) Nature 444, 860-867[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. B. Jorgensen, J. Honeyman, J. S. Oakhill, D. Fazakerley, J. Stockli, B. E. Kemp, and G. R. Steinberg
Oligomeric resistin impairs insulin and AICAR-stimulated glucose uptake in mouse skeletal muscle by inhibiting GLUT4 translocation
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2009; 297(1): E57 - E66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Musso, R. Gambino, G. Pacini, F. De Michieli, and M. Cassader
Prolonged saturated fat-induced, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide elevation is associated with adipokine imbalance and liver injury in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: dysregulated enteroadipocyte axis as a novel feature of fatty liver
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 558 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
W. Kim and J. M. Egan
The Role of Incretins in Glucose Homeostasis and Diabetes Treatment
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 60(4): 470 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J EndocrinolHome page
L. F Van Gaal, S. W Gutkin, and M. A Nauck
Exploiting the antidiabetic properties of incretins to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus: glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists or insulin for patients with inadequate glycemic control?
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 158(6): 773 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. S. Ahima and M. A. Lazar
Adipokines and the Peripheral and Neural Control of Energy Balance
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1023 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/47/34139    most recent
M704896200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, C. H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, C. H. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement