Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M707855200 on October 31, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 51, 36914-36922, December 21, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/51/36914    most recent
M707855200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torres-Bacete, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torres-Bacete, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Characterization of the NuoM (ND4) Subunit in Escherichia coli NDH-1

CONSERVED CHARGED RESIDUES ESSENTIAL FOR ENERGY-COUPLED ACTIVITIES*Formula

Jesus Torres-Bacete, Eiko Nakamaru-Ogiso, Akemi Matsuno-Yagi, and Takao Yagi1

From the Division of Biochemistry, Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037

Received for publication, September 19, 2007 , and in revised form, October 17, 2007.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The proton-translocating NADH-quinone (Q) oxidoreductase (NDH-1) from Escherichia coli is composed of two segments: a peripheral arm and a membrane arm. The membrane arm contains 7 hydrophobic subunits. Of these subunits, NuoM, a homolog of the mitochondrial ND4 subunit, is proposed to be involved in proton translocation and Q-binding. Therefore, we conducted site-directed mutation of 15 amino acid residues of NuoM and investigated their properties. In all mutants, the assembly of the whole enzyme seemed intact. Mutation of highly conserved Glu144 and Lys234 leads to almost total elimination of energy-transducing NDH-1 activities as well as increased production of superoxide radicals. Their NADH dehydrogenase activities were almost normal. Because these two residues are predicted to be located in the transmembrane segments of NuoM, the results strongly suggest that they participate in proton translocation. Although it is hypothesized that His interacts with a Q head group, mutations at four His moderately inhibited NDH-1 activities and had almost no effect on the Km values for Q or IC50 values of capsaicin-40, a competitive inhibitor for the Q binding site. The data suggest that these His are not involved in the catalytic Q-binding. Functional roles of NuoM and advantages of NDH-1 research as a model for mitochondrial complex I study have been discussed.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Complex I catalyzes the first step of electron transport by the oxidation of NADH, thus providing two electrons for reduction of quinone (Q)2 to QH2 (1). This electron transfer is coupled to the translocation of four protons across the inner mitochondrial membrane to produce an electrochemical gradient (2). Bovine complex I is reported to be composed of 45 different subunits with a molecular mass of ~1000 kDa (3). In contrast, its bacterial counterparts (NDH-1) contain only 13–14 subunits (designated Nqo1-14 for Paracoccus denitrificans and Thermus thermophilus and NuoA-N for Escherichia coli). NDH-1 house similar cofactors to complex I (4–6). All NDH-1 subunits are homologues of the subunits of the complex I core enzyme and the minimal requirement for the coupling site 1.

Low-resolution images obtained from electron microscopic analyses indicated that the NDH-1/complex I have a peripheral arm and a membrane arm, together making a characteristic L-shaped structure (7–9). The peripheral arm protrudes into the cytoplasm (or the matrix) and the membrane arm is embedded within the cytoplasmic membrane (or the inner mitochondrial membrane). The NDH-1 peripheral arm is composed of seven subunits (NuoB, -C, -D, -E, -F, -G, and -I) and bears all prosthetic groups (10, 11). Recently, the three-dimensional structure of the peripheral arm of the T. thermophilus has been determined at high resolution (12). This information supports the localization of all the cofactors in the peripheral arm. The NDH-1 membrane arm is made up of seven subunits (NuoA, -H, -J, -K, -L, -M, and -N) (13–16), which are homologues of mtDNA-encoded subunits (ND1–6 and ND4L) (17, 18). Despite recent progress in the development of tools for structural biological studies, information about the functional and structural roles of these membrane domain subunits is still limited, but it is believed that they play important roles in proton translocation and Q/inhibitor binding (19–23).

Subunit NuoM (a homolog of the mitochondrial ND4 subunit) is the second largest subunit of the membrane arm. It is proposed that NuoM/ND4 together with NuoL/ND5 are distantly located from the peripheral arm (24). It is hypothesized that NuoM/ND4, NuoL/ND5 and NuoN/ND2 have evolved from a common ancestor (25). Furthermore, these subunits have been reported to be homologous to the subunits of multi-subunit cation antiporters (26, 27) and energy-converting NiFe hydrogenases (28, 29). Recently, it has been reported that the NuoM subunit in the E. coli NDH-1 was heavily labeled by a photoreactive Q analogue and proposed that this subunit houses the Q-binding site (22). In addition, it is known that the point mutation G11778A in human mtDNA which induced the R340H mutation in the ND4 subunit is responsible for LHON (30, 31). Therefore, it is of interest to investigate functional and structural roles of conserved amino acid residues of the NuoM subunit by utilizing chromosomal DNA mutation methods (19–21).

In this article, we constructed mutants of 14 conserved and one non-conserved residues by chromosomal DNA manipulation and explored characteristics of these mutants. Of these mutants, E144A, E144Q, and K234A significantly inactivated the energy-transducing NDH-1 activities but scarcely affected NADH dehydrogenase activities, suggesting that Glu144 and Lys234 are essential for the coupling site 1.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—The QuikChange ®II XL site-directed mutagenesis kit and the Herculase ®-enhanced DNA polymerase were from Stratagene (Cedar Creek, TX). The endonucleases were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). PCR product, gel extraction, and plasmid purification kits were from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). NADH, dNADH, antibiotics, acetylated cytochrome c, and bovine superoxide dismutase were from Sigma-Aldrich. p-Nitroblue tetrazolium was from EMD Biosciences (La Jolla, CA). pGEM-T Easy Vector was from Promega (Madison, WI). Goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase conjugate was from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ). The gene replacement vector pKO3 was a kind gift from Dr. George M. Church (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA). Capsaicin-40 (cap-40) was generously provided by Dr. Hideto Miyoshi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). The peptides were synthesized by Sigma Genosys (The Woodlands, TX). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by IDT (Coralville, IA).

Cloning and Mutagenesis of the E. coli nuoM Gene—The strategies used for cloning and mutagenesis of the E. coli nuoM gene were in principle similar to those we reported for the nuoA, nuoJ, and nuoK genes (19–21) and illustrated in Fig. 1. Primer sequences are summarized in the supplemental Table S1. The nuoM gene together with a 1-kb DNA segment upstream and 1-kb DNA segment downstream was cloned by PCR from E. coli DH5{alpha}, generating the fragment nuoM-T. To generate the restriction sites SmaI and SalI, the DNA fragment was amplified from the nuoM-T by PCR using primers A and D. The nuoM-T fragment was cloned in pGEM-T Easy Vector and finally inserted in pKO3 (Fig. 1A). The 1-kb DNA segment upstream with the 5'-sequence of nuoM gene was cloned by PCR using primers A and B, generating the fragment nuoM-U, and the 1-kb DNA segment downstream with the 3' sequence of nuoM gene was cloned by PCR using primers C and D, generating the fragment nuoM-D. Both fragments were cloned in pGEM-T Easy Vector. The spectinomycin-encoding gene (spc) from Transposon Tn554 from Staphylococcus aureus (32) was cloned by PCR using the primers E2 and F2, both containing the HindIII restriction site. The spc fragment obtained was cloned in pGEM-T Easy Vector and finally inserted between the nuoM-U and nuoM-D fragments, generating the nuoM(spc) fragment and assembled in pKO3 generating the pKO3/nuoM-(spc) plasmid (Fig. 1C). To introduce point mutations in the nuoM gene primers J and M were used to amplify the nuoM gene by PCR. The DNA fragment obtained was cloned in pGEM-T Easy Vector and used as a template for the mutagenesis primers (Fig. 1B). The mutated fragments were inserted in pKO3/nuoM-T using the PflMI and BsmFI restriction sites, generating the pKO3/nuoM-T (mutants).


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.
Schematic representation of the strategy of E. coli nuoM gene cloning together with 1 kb upstream and downstream (A), construction of site-specific nuoM mutants (B), and insertion of a spc cassette in the E. coli nuoM gene (C). Arrows illustrate the primers used in this study. The bold-faced restriction enzyme sites are newly introduced into the E. coli DNA.

 
Preparation of nuoM Knock-out and Mutant Cells—E. coli MC4100 (F–, araD139, {Delta}(arg F-lac) U169, ptsF25, relA1, flb5301, rpsL 150.{lambda}–) was used to generate knock-out and site-specific mutations of nuoM employing the pKO3 system. The process was carried out according to the method described by Link et al. (33) with the modification described previously by Kao et al. (19). E. coli nuoM knock-out (NuoM-KO mutant) was constructed by replacement of the nuoM gene in the NDH-1 operon for the nuoM(spc) fragment inserted in the pKO3 plasmid. The NuoM-KO mutant obtained were verified by PCR sequencing using specific oligonucleotides and stored in glycerol stocks at–80 °C. In subsequent steps the pKO3/nuoM-T(mutant) plasmids were used for construction of site-directed nuoM mutants. The correct introduction of point mutations in the chromosome was verified by direct DNA sequencing.

Antibody Production—On the basis of facility of peptide syntheses and antigenicity, we selected two regions (Phe205 to Ser216 and Lys447 to Asp464) to raise antibodies specific to E. coli NuoM. Two oligopeptides (H-FNYEELLNTPMSC-OH (ECONuoM-1) and H-CKAKSQIASQELPGMSLRD-OH (ECONuoM-7)) were synthesized and conjugated to the maleimide-activated bovine serum albumin according to the manufacturer's protocol. The anti-ECONuoM-1 and anti-ECONuoM-7 antibodies were affinity-purified by using the ECONuoM-1 and ECONuoM-7 peptides linked to the Sulfo-Link Coupling Gel (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The antibodies specific to peripheral subunits NuoB, NuoCD, NuoE, NuoF, NuoG, and NuoI were available from our previous works (34).

E. coli Membrane Preparation—The E. coli membranes were prepared according to the method by Kao et al. (20). In brief, the cells were grown in 250 ml of Terrific Broth medium until A600 of 2 and were then harvested at 5,800 x g for 10 min. The cells were resuspended at 10% (w/v) in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 15% (w/v) glycerol. Lysozyme was added to the cell suspension at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and incubated on ice for 30 min. After that, the cell suspensions were sonicated twice during 15 s, were passed twice in a French press at 25,000 p.s.i. and centrifuged at 23,400 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 256,600 x g for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in the same buffer as described above, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at–80 °C until their use.

Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blotting Analysis—The expression of the NDH-1 subunits was determined by using the antibodies specific to ECONuoM-1, ECONuoM-7, NuoB, NuoCD, NuoE, NuoF, NuoG, and NuoI in Western blot experiments. To investigate the assembly of the NDH-1 subunits Blue-Native PAGE was performed according to Schägger and Von Jagow (35). In brief, E. coli membranes equivalent to a 800 µg of protein were resuspended in 160 µl of 750 mM aminocaproic acid, 50 mM BisTris-HCl (pH 7.0), 0.1 mg/ml DNase, and 0.8% (w/v) dodecyl-β-maltoside. After the incubation on ice for 2 h, the samples were centrifuged at 149,000 x g for 5 min. The supernatants were recovered, and 2% (w/v) of Coomassie Blue Gin1 M aminocaproic acid was added at a final concentration of Coomassie Blue of 0.08% (v/v). 10 µl of the samples were loaded on a 7% separating gel with a 4% stacking gel, and the electrophoresis was performed in the cold room at 80 V until the penetration of the proteins in the separating gel. After that, the cathode buffer, containing 0.02% of Serva Blue G, was replaced by the same but containing 0.002% of Serva Blue G, and the electrophoresis was continued at 150 V until the dye went out. When the electrophoresis was finished the gel was washed several times in 2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and subjected to immunoblotting analysis, using the anti-ECONuoM-1 antibody. For the NADH dehydrogenase activity staining of NDH-1 the gels were incubated in 2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 2.5 mg/ml of p-nitroblue tetrazolium and 150 µM NADH for 2 h at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped with 7% acetic acid.

Activity Analyses—It is known that NDH-1 can use dNADH as well as NADH as a substrate, allowing it to be distinguished from the NDH-2 (36). On the basis of this, we have used dNADH as substrate in the enzymatic assays. All the measurements were conducted at 30 °C using a SLM DW-2000 spectrophotometer. The dNADH oxidase assays were performed spectrophotometrically with 80 µg of protein/ml of membrane samples in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM EDTA. The reaction was started by the addition of 0.15 mM dNADH, and the measurements were followed at a wavelength of 340 nm as described previously (37). 10 µM cap-40 was added for the complete inhibition of the reaction (38). The dNADH-DB reductase assays were performed in the same conditions, except that the reaction buffer contained 10 mM KCN and 0.1 mM of DB. The dNADH-K3Fe(CN)6 reductase assays were performed in the same conditions as the dNADH-DB reductase assays, but DB was replaced by 1 mM K3Fe(CN)6, and the measurements were monitored at 420 nm. The extinction coefficients used for activity calculations were {epsilon}340 = 6.22 mM–1 cm–1 for dNADH and {epsilon}420 = 1.00 mM–1 cm–1 for K3Fe(CN)6. The extent of membrane potentials were assayed with 0.33 mg of protein/ml of membrane samples in 50 mM MOPS (pH 7.3), 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, and 2 µM oxonol VI as described previously (20, 39). The reaction was started by addition of 0.2 mM dNADH and the absorbance changes at 630–603 nm were recorded. 2 µM of the proton ionophore FCCP was used as the uncoupler. Proton pump activity was detected by ACMA fluorescence quenching as described by Amarneh and Vik (40). 0.2 mM dNADH was used as the respiratory substrate. The production of superoxide radicals were measured at 550 nm with membrane samples at 0.24 mg of protein/ml in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 5 µM acetylated cytochrome c as a reporter (41). The reactions were started by addition of 0.15 mM dNADH. In parallel, reactions included 15 units of superoxide dismutase were performed as control. The extinction coefficient of 21 mM–1 cm–1 was used for reduction of acetylated cytochrome c.

Other Analytical Procedures—Protein concentrations were determined by BCA protein assay kit (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as standard according to the manufacturer's instructions. Any variations from the procedures and details are described in the figure legends.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sequence Analysis of the NuoM Subunit—The E. coli NuoM subunit is a polypeptide of 509 amino acid residues. Fig. 2A shows the amino acid sequence alignment of this subunit in various organisms. Our attempt to determine the topology of the E. coli NuoM subunit using anti-ECONuoM-1 and anti-ECONuoM-7 antibodies was unsuccessful. Therefore, a topology of the E. coli NuoM subunit was proposed by most reasonable predictions offered by a composite of computer programs including TopPredII (42, 43), PHDhtm (44), TMHMM (45), SOSUI (46–48) Tmpred (49), and HMMTOP (50). The final model also accommodated experimentally determined topology of Rhodobacter capsulatus NuoL subunit which exhibits amino acid sequence homologies to the NuoM subunit (51). According to this proposed model, the E. coli NuoM subunits contains 14 transmembrane segments (designated TM1–14 from the N terminus), with the N- and C-terminal regions facing the periplasmic sides of the membrane (Fig. 2B). The number of TM of the E. coli NuoM subunit seems to be consistent with the results from EM analyses of the membrane domain of the E. coli NDH-1 at 8-Å resolution (9).

As described before, there are at least two functional roles assigned for the membrane domain. Those are proton translocation and Q reduction. It is recognized that conserved residues located in the TM and with charge are involved in proton translocation of the energy transducing enzyme complexes exemplified by ATP synthases (52). Therefore, we searched for qualified amino acid residues. From Fig. 2, it turned out that Asp84, Asp135, Glu144, Lys234, Lys265, Arg273, His322, His348, and Tyr435 (E. coli NuoM numbering) are the likely candidates. Our further data base analysis (data not shown) revealed that Glu144 and Lys234 are almost perfectly conserved in the NuoM/ND4 homologues. It should be noted that these two residues are also conserved in the NuoL and NuoN subunits of NDH-1/complex I, the MrpA and MrpD subunits of multisubunit cation anti-porter complexes and the EchA subunit of energy-converting NiFe hydrogenase (see supplemental Fig. S1).


Figure 2
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.
A, similarity of the deduced amino acid sequences among the E. coli NuoM subunit and its homologues from various organisms. The alignment was carried out by the ClustalW program (71). Black boxes with white letters show perfectly conserved residues among the listed organisms. Dark gray boxes with white letters illustrate conserved residues among at least four organisms. Gray boxes with black letters indicate similar residues among at least four organisms. Amino acids mutated in this study are marked by arrows. Sequence sources and their Swiss-Prot accession numbers are: NuoMEco, E. coli K-12 NuoM subunit [P0AFE8]; Nqo13Pde, P. denitrificans Nqo13 subunit [P29925]; Nqo13Tth, T. thermophilus HB-8 Nqo13 [Q56228]; ND4Yli, Yarrowia lipolytica ND4 subunit [Q9B6D6]; ND4Cre, C. reinhardtii ND4 subunit [P20113]; ND4Nta, Nicotiana tabacum chloroplast ND4 subunit [P06262]; ND4Human, Homo sapiens ND4 subunit [Q4F0G8]. B, speculative topology of the E. coli NuoM subunit and proposed locations of the mutated amino acids and the oligopeptides NuoM-1 and NuoM-7. Circles, almost perfectly conserved amino acid residues; rectangles, well conserved amino acid residues; diamond, not conserved amino acid residue.

 
On the basis of the three-dimensional structures surrounding the QA and QB sites of bacterial photoreaction center and Qi site of bc1 complex, Fisher and Rich (53) proposed that the triad sequence motif (aliphatic-(X)3-H-(X)2/3-(L/T/S)) may form a part of the Q headgroup pocket. In accordance with this sequence motif of Q-binding, His241, His322, and His348 might be considered as candidates. Near His241, there are Trp243 and Pro245. Because these residues are also conserved, we mutated these residues. In addition, it has been reported that a photoaffinity Q derivative labeled the fragment between Val184 and Asn206 of E. coli NDH-1 NuoM (22). Because the fragment houses the Q-binding triad motif (Leu192-XXX-His196-XXX-Thr200) (53), the authors suggest that subunit NuoM bears the Q-binding site and His196 might be involved in Q-binding (22). Although it is recognized that His196 is not a conserved residue, this His was also listed up as the candidate for Q-binding.


Figure 3
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3.
Immunoblotting of membrane preparations from the wild-type (WT), NuoM knock-out (KO), NuoM revertant (KO-Rev), and site-specific NuoM mutants. Antibodies specific to NuoB, NuoCD, NuoE, NuoF, NuoG, NuoI, and NuoM-1 and -7 were used. E. coli membranes (10 µg of protein per lane) were loaded on 15% Laemmli SDS-polyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, Western blotting was carried out with SuperSignal West Pico System (Pierce) according to Han et al. (72). The secondary antibody used for detection was goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase conjugate.

 
In a large number of LHON families, predisposition to the disease is tightly associated with the point mutation G11778A in human mtDNA (54). This mutation results in the replacement of Arg340 by His (human ND4 numbering). Sequence comparison between the human ND4 subunit and homologues of many species has shown that the ND4 Arg340 residue is conserved in many NDH-1/complex I and corresponded to the Arg369 residue in E. coli NuoM (see Fig. 2). The function of Arg369 has been also examined. In addition, highly conserved Arg365 located nearby Arg369 was explored.

We constructed the site-directed NuoM point mutants: D84N, D84A, D135A, D135N, D135E, E144A, E144Q, E144D, H196A, K234A, H241A, W243A, W243Y, P245A, K265A, R273A, H322A, H348A, R365A, R369H, and Y435A by chromosomal homologous recombination. All mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Subunit Assembly of NDH-1 in NuoM Mutations—To investigate whether mutation of the NuoM subunit affects subunit assembly of NDH-1, we first analyzed mutant E. coli membranes on SDS-PAGE by immunoblotting using subunit-specific antibodies (Fig. 3). Antibodies used were raised against six peripheral subunits (NuoB, NuoCD, NuoE, NuoF, NuoG, and NuoI) and two oligopeptides of NuoM (ECONuoM-1 and ECONuoM-7). The NuoM-KO mutant, as expected, lacked NuoM. It also showed diminished assembly of peripheral subunits, possibly due to incomplete assembly of the whole NDH-1. In the revertant mutant (KO-Rev), all peripheral subunits and NuoM existed at the same levels as the wild-type. Similarly, in all constructed point mutants, no significant quantitative difference was observed for the peripheral subunits and furthermore the NuoM subunits of those mutants exhibited the same mobility as the wild-type. The data suggest that these mutations did not result in unstable or truncated NuoM subunit. In contrast, the D135A mutant appeared to show considerably lower amounts of NuoM in the membranes.

Another procedure to investigate effects of NuoM mutants on subunit assembly is to utilize BN-PAGE. In Fig. 4, the assembled NDH-1 on a BN-PAGE gel of our samples was visualized by using anti-ECONuoM-1 antibodies and by NADH dehydrogenase activity staining. As expected, the NuoM-KO mutant apparently lacked a fully assembled NDH-1. The D135A mutation partially decreased the amount of the assembled NDH-1 and NADH dehydrogenase activity staining. Other point mutants were akin to the wild-type. Once again, our results indicate that there is no drastic change that may alter the assembly status of NDH-1 in the point mutants.


Figure 4
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 4.
NADH dehydrogenase activity staining (A) and immunoblotting (B) of BN-PAGE gels of membrane preparations from E. coli. Membranes from the wild-type (WT), NuoM knock-out (KO), NuoM revertant (KO-Rev), and NuoM point mutants were compared. The arrow shows the location of the NDH-1 band. The dodecyl-β-maltoside concentration was 0.8%. The electrophoresis was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." For NADH dehydrogenase activity staining, the gels were incubated with 2.5 mg/ml p-nitroblue tetrazolium and 150 µM NADH for 2 h at 37 °C. The reaction was terminated by 7% acetic acid. For immunoblotting, after BN-PAGE, the E. coli membrane proteins were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Subsequently, the membranes were immunostained with the affinity-purified NuoM-1 antibody.

 
Effects of NuoM Mutation on NDH-1 Activities—We measured electron transfer activities of NDH-1 by using membrane vesicles prepared from wild type and NuoM mutants (Table 1). In addition to NDH-1, E. coli also houses an alternative NADH-Q oxidoreductase (NDH-2) lacking an energy coupling site (19–21). The E. coli NDH-2 is insensitive to specific inhibitors for NDH-1 such as capsaicin (38, 55) and cannot use dNADH as a substrate (36). NADH-driven respiration of the wild-type membranes (MC4100 strain) was 65% sensitive to capsaicin, indicating that ~35% of the NADH oxidase activity was ascribed to NDH-2 (data not shown). To measure the activities derived solely from NDH-1, we used dNADH as the substrate. We conducted three types of assays (dNADH oxidase activity; dNADH-DB reductase activity; dNADH dehydrogenase activity) to assess the effects of the mutations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1
Enzymatic activities and parameters of NuoM mutants of E. coli NDH-1

 
The NuoM-KO mutant exhibited almost null activity of the energy-coupled NDH-1 activities (dNADH oxidase and dNADH-DB reductase) similar to the NuoA-KO (19), NuoJ-KO (20), and NuoK-KO (9) mutants. In contrast, the NuoM-KO mutant retained considerable activity of dNADH-K3Fe(CN)6 reductase (~35% of parent membranes), which were higher than the other hydrophobic subunits-KO mutants (~10% of the parent membranes). As shown in Fig. 3, the decrease of the E and F subunits (flavoprotein subcomplex) in the membranes is in agreement with loss of the NADH dehydrogenase activity. Recently, it has been reported that NuoA, NuoJ, and NuoK may directly interact with the peripheral arm, whereas NuoM and NuoL are distantly located from the peripheral arm (9, 14, 56). Therefore, it seems reasonable that effects of NuoA-, NuoJ-, and NuoK-KO mutants are more drastic than those of NuoM-KO mutant.

As shown in Table 1, the KO-Rev mutant displayed properties comparable to the wild-type strain in all enzymatic activities tested. This proved that the procedure used to introduce point mutations in the chromosomal nuoM gene worked out as described in NuoJ and NuoK mutations (19, 21).

The point mutants constructed displayed various degrees of inhibition of dNADH oxidase activity and dNADH-DB reductase activity. The two activities behaved in a similar manner among the mutants tested, implying that the observed effects are due to the NDH-1 mutations. Mutation of the highly conserved Glu144 in the TM had the greatest impact, with almost total abolishment of activities with E144A and E144Q. Interestingly, E144D mutation scarcely affected the energy-transducing NDH-1 activity. In addition, mutations of the highly conserved Lys234 and Lys265 in the TM significantly reduced activities with K234A (~90% inhibition) and K265A (~70% inhibition). We also investigated the four histidine residues (His196, His241, His322, and His348) proposed to be involved in the catalytic Q-binding. No mutants showed detrimental effects on the activities. In addition, the Km values for DB of these mutants were determined to be in the range of 2.2–2.7 µM, which is almost the same as that for wild-type (2.5 µM). Mutation of R369H (equivalent to 11778 mutation found in mtDNA of LHON patients) suppressed the activities to 70% of the wild-type. These values seem to be reasonably in good agreement with the results that NADH-linked respiration in mitochondria of cells carrying 11778 mutation was 38% lower than those of control cells (57). D135A mutation decreased activities to 40% of the wild-type. However, D135N mutation slightly suppressed the energy-coupled activities to ~80% of the wild type. Therefore, it is unlikely that Asp135 is essential for activities. The data suggest that other highly conserved residues Asp84, Trp243, Pro245, Arg273, Arg365, or Tyr435 are not essential for activity.

It is generally recognized that cap-40 acts as a competitive inhibitor for Q in NDH-1/complex I and suppresses only energy-coupled activities (38) and that the binding site of this inhibitor is located within the membrane domain of NDH-1/complex I. In our preparations from the wild-type strain, cap-40 inhibited the dNADH-dependent respiration by 97% (21). We then investigated the effects of NuoM mutation on the inhibitory characteristics of cap-40. As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference in the IC50 values of cap-40 between the wild-type and the mutants, suggesting that the cap-40 binding site is not modified by these point mutations.

Measurements of Electrochemical Potential of NuoM Mutants—Membrane potential of mutant membrane vesicles was monitored by following the absorbance change of oxonol VI. As shown in Fig. 5, addition of dNADH to the membrane vesicles from the wild-type strain increased the absorbance indicating generation of {Delta}{Psi} (inside positive) which was then dissipated by FCCP. The signal was enhanced in the presence of nigericin and totally abolished by the presence of both nigericin and valinomycin. Preincubation of the membrane vesicles with cap-40 also prevented the {Delta}{Psi} formation (data not shown). As expected, no {Delta}{Psi} was observed in the membranes of the KO mutant, and the membrane vesicles of KO-rev mutant generated a signal comparable to that of the wild-type strain. Mutation of highly conserved Glu144 to Ala or Gln, resulted in a complete loss of the ability of the enzyme to generate {Delta}{Psi}. In contrast, mutant E144D exhibited {Delta}{Psi} comparable to the wild-type. These results are consistent with the data of the energy-transducing electron transfer activities of NDH-1. In the case of another highly conserved Lys234, mutation to Ala caused a significant reduction in {Delta}{Psi}.


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 5.
Detection of the membrane potential generated by dNADH oxidation in E. coli NuoM mutants. Membrane vesicles were prepared from each of the constructed mutants, and the membrane potential changes were monitored by the absorbance changes of oxonol VI at 630-603 nm at 37 °C. At the time indicated by arrows, 0.2 mM dNADH (shown by 1), 2 µM valinomycin (Val), 0.2 µM nigericin (Nig), or 2 µM FCCP (indicated by 2) was added to the assay mixture containing 50 mM MOPS (pH 7.3), 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 2 µM oxonol VI, and E. coli membrane samples (330 µg of protein/ml).

 
The formation of proton gradient was monitored by using ACMA (see Fig. 6). Membrane vesicles from wild-type and the KO-rev mutant exhibited an almost identical response. The signal was completely reversed by FCCP. No proton translocation was observed in NuoM-KO mutant. Mutant E144A or E144Q did not show any sign of proton translocation. As expected, Mutant E144D showed proton translocation comparable to the wild type. K234A mutant displayed significantly slow proton translocation and did not reach stationary phase in the range of experimental time.

Generation of Superoxide Radicals by NuoM Mutants—Fig. 7 illustrates production of superoxide radicals by the NuoM mutant membranes. It is obvious that E144A, E144Q, and K234A mutants produced significant amounts of superoxide radicals induced by dNADH. Cap-40 also stimulated the production of superoxide radicals. In contrast, only small amounts of superoxide radicals were detected in the wild-type, E144D, K256A, and R369H mutants. These results suggest that the mutants with severe inhibition of the NDH-1 activities (>90% inhibition) could generate superoxide radicals. Similar mechanism has been observed in overproduction of superoxide radicals by complex I inhibition in mammalian mitochondria (58, 59). Mutant R369H corresponding to the human 11778 mtDNA mutation associated with LHON barely generated superoxide radicals.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Membrane-bound enzymes involved in proton or ion translocation tend to contain highly conserved, charged amino acids in the hydrophobic environment of the protein. The Asp (or Glu) residue in the DCCD-binding subunit of ATP synthase is probably one of the best known examples of such highly preserved carboxyl group essential for proton translocation and also is well characterized mechanistically (60). Membrane domain subunits of NDH-1 have a number of conserved residues with charged groups in the predicted membrane spanning regions. Site-directed mutation studies in our group and other laboratories revealed several candidate residues that may be part of the proton translocation mechanism. In these cases, mutating a residue resulted in a partial decrease of coupled activities to a varying extent. However, there was only one residue, Glu36 in NuoK (ND4L), whose elimination of its carboxyl residue lead to a complete loss of coupled activities (21, 61). In the present study, we have shown that Glu144 in subunit NuoM (ND4) is also absolutely essential for the energy-coupled NDH-1 activities. This is only the second case of complete elimination of coupled activity by a single mutation. A sequence comparison (Supplemental Fig. S1) indicates that a residue equivalent to Glu144 of NuoM is also conserved in NuoL and NuoN, which may not be surprising because the three subunits are proposed to diverge from a single common ancestor (51). Interestingly, the same Glu residue is also conserved in MrpA and MrpD of the multisubunit cation antiporters and EchA of the energy-converting NiFe hydrogenases. Given the fact that a common function among all these enzymes is proton translocation, it is highly likely that the carboxyl group of Glu144 in NuoM is directly involved in the mechanism of proton pump of NDH-1. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that NDH-1/complex I are inhibited by amiloride derivatives which act as specific inhibitors to Na+/H+ antiporters (62, 63). It is possible, however, that the exact role of Glu144 in NuoM might not be the same as that of Glu36 in NuoK. First, there is no counterpart of NuoK/ND4L in the multisubunit cation antiporters or energy-converting NiFe hydrogenases. Second, NuoK seems to be close to the proposed Q site of the peripheral segment, but the center of NuoM is believed to be about 60 Å away from it (9). The presence of a carboxyl residue participating in the proton translocation distantly located from the peripheral domain where the electron transfer takes place would be supportive evidence for indirect energy coupling mechanism in NDH-1/complex I.


Figure 6
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 6.
Generation of a pH gradient coupled to dNADH oxidation in E. coli NuoM mutants. Membranes were prepared from each of the constructed mutants, and the extent of proton translocation was measured by the quenching of the fluorescence of ACMA at room temperature with an excitation wavelength of 410 nm and an emission wavelength of 480 nm. At the time indicated by arrows, 0.2 mM dNADH, 2 µM valinomycin, 2 µM nigericin, or 10 µM FCCP was added to the assay mixture containing 50 mM MOPS (pH7.3), 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 2 µM ACMA, and E. coli membrane samples (150 µg of protein/ml). 1, WT; 2, NuoM KO; 3, D135A; 4, E144A; 5, E144Q; 6, E144D; 7, K234A; 8, K265A; 9, R369H.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 7.
Effects of NuoM mutations on production of superoxide radicals coupled to dNADH oxidase. The productions of superoxide radicals were detected by SOD-sensitive acetylated cytochrome c reduction. The triplicate experiments were done. The error bars are standard deviations. WT, wild type; WT Cap40, wild type in the presence of 10 µM cap-40. Detailed experimental conditions are described under "Experimental Procedures."

 
In addition to carboxyl residues, positively charged residues in TM may also be involved in proton channel as has been reported for a Lys in certain respiratory enzyme complexes (64) and an Arg in the ATP synthase (65). We investigated six highly conserved, positively charged residues predicted to be in the TM regions of E. coli NuoM. Mutations, K234A and K265A, had the greatest impact with the former resulting in nearly total abolishment of activities with K234A (~90% inhibition). Lys234 is highly conserved in both NuoL and NuoN, whereas Lys265 is conserved in NuoN but not in NuoL. In addition, Lys234, but not Lys265, is also conserved in MrpA, MrpD, and EchA subunits (see Supplemental Fig. S1). It seems likely that almost perfectly conserved Lys234 residue in TM of NuoM participates in the proton translocation in NDH-1/complex I similar to Glu144. Recently, Vik's group (40) reported that in the E. coli NuoN subunit the E133A mutant (equivalent to Glu144 in NuoM) showed only a 30% loss of dNADH oxidase activity and the K217C mutant (corresponding to Lys234 in NuoM) showed almost null activity. The data together with those in this study suggest that the functional role of the three homologous subunits (NuoL, M, and N) might be different.

The presence of an essential histidine residue in the Q-binding site has been reported. For example, mutations of His217 of cytochrome b in R. capsulatus bc1 complex or His98 of subunit I in E. coli bo3 complex were shown to have major effects on the activities and properties of the respective enzyme (66, 67). In the case of E. coli NuoM, photoaffinity labeling experiments suggested a location of the Q-binding site to be between Val184 and Asn206 (22). This sequence region contains one histidine, His196 that is part of the proposed Q-binding motif (LX3HX3(T/S)). Independently, Fisher and Rich (53) proposed that highly conserved His319 of human ND4 (His348 of E. coli NuoM) is the Q-binding site on the basis of Q-binding motif. Our present study indicates that the mutations of these two histidine residues (His196 and His348) as well as two highly conserved histidines (His241 and His322) did not give rise to any significant alterations in the characteristics of the enzyme including energy-transducing activities, Km values for Q and IC50 for cap-40. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that these His residues are involved in the catalytic Q binding.

It is known that a homoplasmic mutation R340H in ND4 (the G to A substitution at position 11778 of human mtDNA) is associated with LHON. Hofhaus et al. (57) and Park et al. (68) reported that NADH dehydrogenase-dependent respiration, as measured in digitonin-permeabilized cells, was specifically decreased by ~40% in the R340H mutant cells constructed by using cybrid systems. As described above, The ND4 Arg340 is conserved in the many organisms including E. coli (Arg369 NuoM). To investigate whether the E. coli NDH-1 is a useful model of complex I, we constructed mutant R369H and examined its properties. The energy-coupled NDH-1 activities of mutant R369H membranes were suppressed to 60–70%. In contrast, Lunardi et al. (54) constructed R368H (equivalent to human R340H) mutants of NuoM using R. capsulatus chromosomal gene manipulation technique and investigated the properties of this mutant. This mutant showed a clear impairment in oxidative phosphorylation capacity. However, no significant reduction of NADH-dependent respiration and its coupled proton uptake was observed in isolated membranes. This difference between R. capsulatus and E. coli membranes may be due to the complicated electron transfer system of R. capsulatus or the fact that only the NADH oxidase activity was measured in R. capsulatus. By using the E. coli system, it is possible to carry out comprehensive studies concerning effects by mutations inducing LHON.

It is recognized that all seven ND subunits are encoded by mtDNA. The only known exception is ND3 and ND4L subunits of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (69). At present, systematic studies of mtDNA-encoded subunits are technically difficult although it might become possible in a future to carry out site-directed mutagenesis of mitochondrially encoded subunits (70). In fact, to date mutants of mtDNA which have been investigated were limited (e.g. mutated mtDNA from patients with mitochondrial diseases). We have shown that E. coli NDH-1 works as a useful model of complex I by using systematic mutants of membrane domain subunits NuoA (ND3), NuoJ (ND6), NuoK (ND4L), and NuoM (ND4). To solve energy-transducing mechanism of NDH-1/complex I, it is prerequisite to thoroughly study properties of hydrophobic domain subunits. For this purpose, E. coli NDH-1 looks a suitable system.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health R01GM033712 (to T. Y. and A. M.-Y.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

Formula The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Table S1 and Fig. S1. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Biochemistry, Dept. of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037. Fax: 858-784-2054; E-mail: yagi{at}scripps.edu.

2 The abbreviations used are: Q, quinone(s); complex I, mitochondrial proton-translocating NADH-quinone oxidoreductase; NDH-1, bacterial proton (sodium ion?)-translocating NADH-quinone oxidoreductase; NDH-2, alternative NADH-quinone oxidoreductase lacking the energy coupling site; DB, 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-decyl-1,4-benzoquinone; dNADH, reduced nicotinamide hypoxanthine dinucleotide (deamino-NADH); Spc, Spectinomycin; LHON, Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy; cap-40, capsaicin-40; oxonol VI, bis-(3-propyl-5-oxoisoxazol-4-yl) pentamethine oxonol; ACMA, 9-amino-6-chloro-2-methoxyacridine; FCCP, carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone; TM, transmembrane segment(s); mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Hideto Miyoshi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), for kindly providing capsaicin 40, Dr. George M. Church (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) for allowing us to use the pKO3 plasmid, and Drs. Byoung Boo Seo, Mathieu Marella, Jennifer Barber-Singh, and Prem Kumar Sinha (TSRI, La Jolla) for discussion.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hirst, J. (2005) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 525–529[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Galkin, A. S., Grivennikova, V. G., and Vinogradov, A. D. (1999) FEBS Lett. 451, 157–161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Carroll, J., Fearnley, I. M., Skehel, J. M., Shannon, R. J., Hirst, J., and Walker, J. E. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 32724–32727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Yagi, T., Yano, T., and Matsuno-Yagi, A. (1993) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 25, 339–345[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Friedrich, T., Abelmann, A., Brors, B., Guénebaut, V., Kintscher, L., Leonard, K., Rasmussen, T., Scheide, D., Schlitt, A., Schulte, U., and Weiss, H. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1365, 215–219[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Yagi, T., Yano, T., Di Bernardo, S., and Matsuno-Yagi, A. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364, 125–133[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Guénebaut, V., Schlitt, A., Weiss, H., Leonard, K., and Friedrich, T. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 276, 105–112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Clason, T., Zickermann, V., Ruiz, T., Brandt, U., and Radermacher, M. (2007) J. Struct. Biol. 159, 433–442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Baranova, E. A., Holt, P. J., and Sazanov, L. A. (2007) J. Mol. Biol. 366, 140–154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Takano, S., Yano, T., and Yagi, T. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 9120–9127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Yano, T., and Yagi, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28606–28611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sazanov, L. A., and Hinchliffe, P. (2006) Science 311, 1430–1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Di Bernardo, S., Yano, T., and Yagi, T. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 9411–9418[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Di Bernardo, S., and Yagi, T. (2001) FEBS Lett. 508, 385–388[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Kao, M. C., Di Bernardo, S., Matsuno-Yagi, A., and Yagi, T. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 4377–4384[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kao, M. C., Di Bernardo, S., Matsuno-Yagi, A., and Yagi, T. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 4534–4543[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chomyn, A., Mariottini, P., Cleeter, M. W. J., Ragan, C. I., Matsuno-Yagi, A., Hatefi, Y., Doolittle, R. F., and Attardi, G. (1985) Nature 314, 591–597
  18. Chomyn, A., Cleeter, M. W. J., Ragan, C. I., Riley, M., Doolittle, R. F., and Attardi, G. (1986) Science 234, 614–618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kao, M. C., Di Bernardo, S., Perego, M., Nakamaru-Ogiso, E., MatsunoYagi, A., and Yagi, T. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 32360–32366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kao, M. C., Di Bernardo, S., Nakamaru-Ogiso, E., Miyoshi, H., MatsunoYagi, A., and Yagi, T. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 3562–3571[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kao, M. C., Nakamaru-Ogiso, E., Matsuno-Yagi, A., and Yagi, T. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 9545–9554[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Gong, X., Xie, T., Yu, L., Hesterberg, M., Scheide, D., Friedrich, T., and Yu, C. A. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 25731–25737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Murai, M., Ishihara, A., Nishioka, T., Yagi, T., and Miyoshi, H. (2007) Biochemistry 46, 6409–6416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Baranova, E. A., Morgan, D. J., and Sazanov, L. A. (2007) J. Struct. Biol. 159, 238–242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Mathiesen, C., and Hagerhall, C. (2003) FEBS Lett. 549, 7–13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Mathiesen, C., and Hagerhall, C. (2002) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1556, 121–132[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Steuber, J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26817–26822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hedderich, R. (2004) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 36, 65–75[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Hedderich, R., and Forzi, L. (2005) J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 10, 92–104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Wallace, D. C., Singh, G., Lott, M. T., Hodge, J. A., Schurr, T. G., Lezza, A. M. S., Elsas, L. J., and Nikoskelainen, E. K. (1988) Science 242, 1427–1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Majander, A., Finel, M., Savontaus, M. L., Nikoskelainen, E., and Wikström, M. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 239, 201–207[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Murphy, E., Huwyler, L., and Freire Bastos, M. C. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 3357–3365[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Link, A. J., Phillips, D., and Church, G. M. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 6228–6237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Nakamaru-Ogiso, E., Yano, T., Yagi, T., and Ohnishi, T. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 301–307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Schagger, H., and Von Jagow, G. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 199, 223–231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Matsushita, K., Ohnishi, T., and Kaback, H. R. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 7732–7737[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Yagi, T. (1986) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 250, 302–311[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Satoh, T., Miyoshi, H., Sakamoto, K., and Iwamura, H. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1273, 21–30[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ghelli, A., Benelli, B., and Degli Esposti, M. (1997) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 121, 746–755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Amarneh, B., and Vik, S. B. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 4800–4808[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Messner, K. R., and Imlay, J. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10119–10128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Claros, M. G., and Von Heijne, G. (1994) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10, 685–686[Free Full Text]
  43. Von Heijne, G. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 225, 487–494[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Rost, B., Fariselli, P., and Casadio, R. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 1704–1718[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Krogh, A., Larsson, B., Von Heijne, G., and Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567–580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Hirokawa, T., Boon-Chieng, S., and Mitaku, S. (1998) Bioinformatics 14, 378–379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Mitaku, S., Hirokawa, T., and Tsuji, T. (2002) Bioinformatics 18, 608–616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Mitaku, S., and Hirokawa, T. (1999) Protein Eng. 12, 953–957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Hofmann, K., and Stoffel, W. (1993) Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler 374, 166
  50. Tusnády, G. E., and Simon, I. (2001) Bioinformatics 17, 849–850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Kikuno, R., and Miyata, T. (1985) FEBS Lett. 189, 85–88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Miller, M. J., Oldenburg, M., and Fillingame, R. H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 4900–4904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Fisher, N., and Rich, P. R. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 296, 1153–1162[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Lunardi, J., Darrouzet, E., Dupuis, A., and Issartel, J. P. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1407, 114–124[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Yagi, T. (1990) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 281, 305–311[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Kao, M. C., Matsuno-Yagi, A., and Yagi, T. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 3750–3755[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Hofhaus, G., Johns, D. R., Hurko, O., Attardi, G., and Chomyn, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13155–13161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Kushnareva, Y., Murphy, A. N., and Andreyev, A. (2002) Biochem. J. 368, 545–553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Marella, M., Seo, B. B., Matsuno-Yagi, A., and Yagi, T. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24146–24156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Fillingame, R. H. (1999) Science 286, 1687–1688[Free Full Text]
  61. Kervinen, M., Patsi, J., Finel, M., and Hassinen, I. E. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 773–781[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Nakamaru-Ogiso, E., Sakamoto, K., Matsuno-Yagi, A., Miyoshi, H., and Yagi, T. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 746–754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Nakamaru-Ogiso, E., Seo, B. B., Yagi, T., and Matsuno-Yagi, A. (2003) FEBS Lett. 549, 43–46[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Branden, M., Tomson, F., Gennis, R. B., and Brzezinski, P. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 10794–10798[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Valiyaveetil, F. I., and Fillingame, R. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32635–32641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Gray, K. A., Dutton, P. L., and Daldal, F. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 723–733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  67. Abramson, J., Riistama, S., Larsson, G., Jasaitis, A., Svensson-Ek, M., Laakkonen, L., Puustinen, A., Iwata, S., and Wikstrom, M. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 910–917[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Park, J. S., Li, Y. F., and Bai, Y. (2007) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1772, 533–542[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Cardol, P., Lapaille, M., Minet, P., Franck, F., Matagne, R. F., and Remacle, C. (2006) Eukaryot. Cell 5, 1460–1467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Remacle, C., Cardol, P., Coosemans, N., Gaisne, M., and Bonnefoy, N. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 4771–4776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Pearson, W. R. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 183, 63–98[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Han, A.-L., Yagi, T., and Hatefi, Y. (1988) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 267, 490–496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 MicrobiologyHome page
Y. Kajiyama, M. Otagiri, J. Sekiguchi, T. Kudo, and S. Kosono
The MrpA, MrpB and MrpD subunits of the Mrp antiporter complex in Bacillus subtilis contain membrane-embedded and essential acidic residues
Microbiology, July 1, 2009; 155(7): 2137 - 2147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. K. Sinha, J. Torres-Bacete, E. Nakamaru-Ogiso, N. Castro-Guerrero, A. Matsuno-Yagi, and T. Yagi
Critical Roles of Subunit NuoH (ND1) in the Assembly of Peripheral Subunits with the Membrane Domain of Escherichia coli NDH-1
J. Biol. Chem., April 10, 2009; 284(15): 9814 - 9823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/51/36914    most recent
M707855200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torres-Bacete, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torres-Bacete, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement