|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 52, 37730-37737, December 28, 2007
Fertilization and Nicotinic Acid Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Induce pH Changes in Acidic Ca2+ Stores in Sea Urchin Eggs*
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NAADP not only evokes a cortical flash but, as first revealed in sea urchin egg, also releases Ca2+ from acidic Ca2+ stores that are lysosome-like organelles (possibly yolk platelets in eggs), whereas inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose release Ca2+ from the neutral endoplasmic reticulum (1, 7). Recently in sea urchin egg homogenate, we revealed that the luminal pH (pHL) of these acidic stores is dynamic and increases upon NAADP-induced Ca2+ release, which is a direct effect of NAADP (and not cytosolic Ca2+) via changes in luminal proton buffering/transport (8). We have now confirmed that the pHL increases observed in homogenate are physiologically relevant in the intact egg upon fertilization. Unexpectedly, these changes are confined to the NAADP-sensitive stores in the egg cortex during a novel, early fertilization event, which may have ramifications for the pHL of NAADP-sensitive stores in mammalian cells.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gamete Preparation—Sea urchin eggs from Lytechinus pictus were harvested by intracoelomic injection of 0.5 M KCl, collected in artificial sea water (ASW; 435 mM NaCl, 40 mM MgCl2, 15 mM MgSO4, 11 mM CaCl2, 10 mM KC1, 2.5 mM NaHCO3, 20 mM Tris base, pH 8.0) and de-jellied by passage through 100-µm nylon mesh (Millipore). Sperm, on the other hand, were collected "dry" and maintained at 4 °C until use.
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy—Eggs adhering to polylysine-coated glass coverslips were placed on the stage of a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope equipped with 10x air and 40x and 63x oil immersion objectives (NA 0.3, 1.3, and 1.4, respectively) and maintained at room temperature in ASW. Simultaneous monitoring of several fluorescent dyes was carried out using the Multitrack mode of the microscope, which rapidly alternates channel collection and thereby greatly reduces bleed-through. For UV excitation, the 364-nm line of a Coherent Enterprise laser was used. The green channel was excited using the 488-nm line of an argon laser (emission, 505-530 nm), whereas the red channel used a 543-nm HeNe laser (emission, >560 nm). In the experiments using an Alexa Fluor 647 Dextran, this third fluorophore was excited with a 633-nm HeNe laser and emission collected at 645-719 nm using the Meta head.
Microinjection—Micropipettes were pulled from capillary glass with an internal filament and backfilled. The pipettes were then mounted in the electrode holder of an Injectman pressure injection system (Eppendorf) used at typical pressures of 200 hPa for 2 s, which produces
1% injection volumes. Injectate compounds were usually prepared in 0.5 M KCl at 100 times the final required concentration, and insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation through a Centricon filter (100,000 molecular weight cutoff). Rhod Dextran was first prepared as 2 mM aliquots in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, to assist solubility and then diluted 1:1 with 1 M KCl. The injectate concentration of Alexa Fluor 647 Dextran was 50-200 µM.
pHL Measurements—We measured pHL with two different approaches. First, eggs were loaded with 2-10 µM Lysosensor Yellow/Blue DND-160 for 15 min with qualitatively similar results at all dye concentrations. Lysosensor Yellow/Blue was imaged ratiometrically on the confocal microscope with excitation at 364 nm and dual emission recorded at 385-470 nm (channel 1) and >505 nm (channel 2). The results are expressed as the ratio of channel 1/channel 2, which is directly proportional to pHL. In the majority of experiments, however, acridine orange was used because of its superior signal-to-noise and its documented use to monitor pHL in both sea urchin egg homogenate (8) and intact eggs (10). However, we modified the acridine orange protocol to measure pHL ratiometrically to circumvent movement and cell volume artifacts. Therefore, intact eggs were simultaneously loaded with 10 µM acridine orange and 1 µM Lysotracker Red DND-99 for 15-20 min at room temperature, at which time the fluorescence reaches an equilibrium; the dyes were present throughout the rest of the experiment. Acridine orange responds rapidly and profoundly to changes in pHL, whereas Lysotracker Red responds only poorly (in agreement with Invitrogen) and remains essentially unchanged throughout the experiment until the addition of NH4Cl. The results are expressed as the ratios of the acridine orange/Lysotracker Red signals such that an increase in the ratio reflects an increase in pHL. At higher magnification (see Fig. 6), Lysotracker Red exhibited some photobleaching that resulted in an artifactual rise in the basal ratio in some eggs. This fall in fluorescence was corrected by using a fifth order polynomial curve fit.
In experiments investigating the effect of sodium removal, the eggs were dye-loaded in normal ASW prior to washes in Na+-free ASW (also containing the pHL dyes) immediately before recording. Na+-free ASW was prepared by replacing NaCl with 435 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine and replacing NaHCO3 with 2.5 mM KHCO3.
Measurement of [Ca2+]i—The eggs were microinjected with the Ca2+-sensitive dye fluo-4 dextran (10 kDa, injectate concentration 1 mM, plus 250 mM KCl, Tris pH 8). After a 15-min recovery period, a second micropipette containing 50-200 µM Alexa Fluor 647 Dextran with or without 100 µM NAADP was used for injection.
Simultaneous Measurement of pHL and [Ca2+]i—The eggs were first microinjected with Ca2+-sensitive Rhod Dextran (Kd 0.7 µM, 1 mM injectate) and then loaded with acridine orange. However, because Rhod Dextran is a much dimmer dye under basal conditions than Lysotracker Red, acridine orange was used at the lower concentration of 1 µM to reduce bleed-through into the necessarily more sensitive red channel. Qualitatively similar results were seen at both 1 and 10 µM acridine orange when eggs were fertilized, but the fluorescence change was smaller with 1 µM.
Simultaneous Measurement of pHL and Exocytosis—Exocytosis was assessed with two different fluorescent techniques. First, by monitoring the disappearance of cortical granules; acridine orange monomers aggregate in acidic vesicles as a function of pHL, and consequently their fluorescence undergoes a red shift as a function of aggregation (10, 11). When excited with the red laser, a selective staining of a narrow (1-2 µm) peripheral ring is observed that corresponds to the acidic cortical granules docked at the plasma membrane (12). The eggs were therefore labeled as before with 10 µM acridine orange for 15-20 min, but this time they were simultaneously viewed in the green and red channels using the Multitrack mode of the microscope (emission/excitation, 488 nm/505-530 nm (green); 543 nm/>560 nm (red)). Note that in the previous ratiometric experiments, the Lysotracker Red signal swamped the dimmer acridine orange red fluorescence.
We used another approach to validate the loss of red acridine orange fluorescence; the extracellular space was also fluorescently labeled with a long wavelength, cell-impermeant dye (10 µM Alexa Fluor 647 Dextran), whose signal was simultaneously collected with the red (cortical granule) and green (pHL) channels as indicated above. At high magnification (63x objective, 2x digital zoom), the exocytosis of individual cortical granules observed with the red acridine orange fluorescence was confirmed when the space vacated by the granule filled with extracellular dye (data not shown), as originally developed by Terasaki (13). The data were analyzed by using Student's t test, paired where appropriate, or by creating a 2 x 2 contingency table analyzed with Fisher's exact test. The significance was set at p < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
When measuring pHL alone, cell-to-cell asynchrony (Fig. 1A) made it difficult to gauge how this pHLASH related temporally with the fertilization Ca2+ response, i.e. would the pHLASH coincide with the Ca2+ cortical flash (Ca2+ influx) or the main Ca2+ wave (intracellular Ca2+ release)? Therefore, we simultaneously measured pHL and [Ca2+]i using acridine orange and the Ca2+ dye Rhod Dextran. In these dual labeling experiments, the first detectable insemination response was the Ca2+ cortical flash (Fig. 2A, left panels), followed after a delay by the main Ca2+ wave (Fig. 2).
Temporally, the pHLASH overlapped with the main Ca2+ wave (Fig. 2, A and B), with the pHL upstroke occurring ostensibly with or just after the sharp [Ca2+]i upstroke; the bar graph in Fig. 2C shows that the lag between sperm addition and the cortical flash is <30 s, whereas the main Ca2+ wave and pHLASH both peak at
65 s. In other words, despite their spatial overlap, the Ca2+ cortical flash and pHLASH are temporally divorced; the latter coincides more with the main wave. This timing is consistent with the pHLASH being associated with the intracellular Ca2+ release phase.
Spatially, the Ca2+ wave and pHLASH wave initiated from the same pole in 7/10 cells (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.02) and propagated through the egg periphery to the antipode (Fig. 2B). Despite a heterogeneous pHL response, the main Ca2+ wave amplitude was the same in the periphery and center (data not shown). Because the Ca2+ wave initiates at the point of sperm entry (2), we conclude that the pHL wave also starts at the point of sperm fusion.
|
Measuring the fluorescence at the periphery, fertilization induced a prompt fall in the red fluorescence, which corresponded to the loss of cortical granules via exocytosis (Fig. 3, A and B). By altering the focus, we verified that this was a true loss of staining rather than egg movement in the focal plane (data not shown). The initiation of the pHLASH and the loss of cortical granules were, on average, simultaneous (Fig. 3A) with a lag of only 5 ± 3 s, which was not significant (n = 34, p > 0.05). However, this obscured the fact that the pHLASH and exocytosis were seldom coincident on an individual egg basis, and plotting the initiation times revealed that there was no significant correlation between these two parameters (Fig. 3B, r2 = 0.003, p > 0.7). These data indicate that the pHLASH and exocytosis can be divorced kinetically.
In addition to their different kinetics, the pHLASH and exocytosis could be spatially distinguished. Fig. 3C shows a profile plot across the cell as indicated in Fig. 3A (upper left) and shows the mean fluorescence changes in the green and red channels after fertilization (Note that the red signal has been inverted for clarity); whereas the red changes were limited to the narrow outer cortical granule layer, the pHLASH occurred in a broader band (up to 25 µm away from the plasma membrane at low magnification).
The final piece of evidence to discount exocytosis as a causal factor comes from experiments with the wasp venom mastoparan. Known to stimulate fertilization envelope formation in sea urchin eggs (15), mastoparan is thought to do so independently of changes in [Ca2+]i (16), presumably by interacting with the exocytotic protein machinery itself. Indeed, although mastoparan readily evoked cortical granule loss (76 ± 3% of sperm control, n = 37), it did so without any detectable pHLASH (—4 ± 6% sperm, p < 0.001; Fig. 3D). Moreover, the addition of sperm after mastoparan elicited no response compared with parallel fertilization controls (—8 ± 1%, p < 0.001). This is consistent with a physical barrier (i.e. the fertilization envelope) being induced by the venom.
The fact that exocytosis and pHLASH can be divorced under a variety of circumstances strongly supports an independent mechanism for the latter. Because it is well known that endocytosis takes place many minutes after the exocytotic burst (12, 17), we conclude that neither of these events is responsible for the pHLASH.
Unitary pHL Events—Not only did the higher resolution images confirm that the pHLASH occurred well away from the fusion with the plasma membrane, but pHLASH was revealed as a summation of smaller events (which we term "pHLARES," pronounced "flares"). When focused at the egg equator, pHLARES were seen to propagate as a wave along a 15-µm-wide cortical band (Fig. 4A). When plotted as a function of distance from the plasma membrane, both the rate of rise and amplitude of these events were well maintained up to
15 µm from the cortical granules (Fig. 4A, red to yellow ROIs), but both parameters fell off dramatically at deeper loci.
|
|
2-µm diameter were more clearly resolved (Fig. 4B, white arrows) presumably because of reduced scatter and turbidity at the egg-substratum interface. Unlike the equatorial slice, the bottom of the egg shows pHLARES firing across the entire field of view that were invariant with distance from the cell edge (Fig. 4B, cf. red and black ROIs). Together, the data indicate that pHL changes can be resolved as small events that are spatially divorced from exocytosis. pHL and Cytosolic pH—In a previous egg population study, the slow vesicular acidification upon fertilization was secondary to changes in cytosolic pH driven by the plasma membrane sodium-proton exchanger (NHE) (10). Therefore, we tested whether the NHE was also involved in the subplasmalemmal pHLASH by inhibiting the NHE with Na+-free medium. However, this had no effect upon the pHLASH amplitude (Fig. 5, p > 0.1), pHLASH kinetics (time to peak in s: control, 67 ± 2; Na+-free, 69 ± 2; p > 0.4), or fertilization envelope formation (data not shown). Nonetheless, it entirely blocked the acidification of granules deeper in the egg (Fig. 5, B and C, p < 0.001) in agreement with previous work (10). We conclude that the cortical pHL response was not secondary to NHE-driven changes in cytosolic pH.
NAADP-induced pHLash—It was unexpected that fertilization could evoke vesicular alkalinization in such a restricted subcellular locus when acidic vesicles are found throughout the egg (7, 10). Given that fertilization is NAADP-dependent, and NAADP is the only Ca2+-mobilizing second messenger that evokes an increase in pHL (8), we microinjected eggs with NAADP to map the spatial distribution of NAADP-sensitive acidic Ca2+ stores that respond with a change in pHL.
In control eggs microinjected with a fluorescent injection marker alone, no substantial change of the pHL (Fig. 6, A and C) or Ca2+ (Fig. 6, D and F) was observed in any part of the egg. By contrast, when NAADP was co-injected into the center of the egg (as judged by the fluorescent marker, left hand images), a rapid and profound alkalinization was evoked in the characteristic peripheral pattern of the pHLASH (Fig. 6, B and C). This was not due to a heterogeneous Ca2+ response because NAADP evoked a global increase (Fig. 6, E and F). In other words, the pHLASH response seen with sperm is entirely consistent with the intrinsic nature of a subpopulation of NAADP-sensitive stores rather than upstream signal compartmentation.
Closer examination revealed that the pHL response to NAADP exhibited aspects that were both similar to as well as different from those induced by sperm. The spatial aspects of the pHLASH were clearly well preserved and sometimes proceeded in a quasi-wave-like manner akin to fertilization (data not shown). The quantitative differences we observed between NAADP- and sperm-induced responses suggest that NAADP generation is limiting during fertilization; the onset of the NAADP-induced response occurred after much a shorter delay compared with that to sperm (5.0 ± 0.5 s after NAADP injection versus
35 s delay after insemination; Fig. 2C) and was of a much faster upstroke (time to peak, seconds: sperm, 31 ± 1; NAADP, 7.6 ± 0.5). The slower fertilization pHLASH kinetics are entirely consistent with the time taken for the egg to generate NAADP. In summary, NAADP alone is sufficient to generate a pHLASH because of the resident cellular architecture.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pHL of acidic vesicles in unfertilized eggs has been reported to be approximately pH 5.5 for both cortical granules (14) and yolk platelets (18), and it has been proposed that the pH within these vesicles serves to regulate luminal enzyme activity (14, 19-21) and/or vesicular integrity (18). That the pHL within egg acidic vesicles can slowly acidify has been suggested during oogenesis (11, 20, 21) and post-fertilization (10), but with the exception of the rapid alkalinization of cortical granules upon fusion and exocytosis (12, 14), rapid increases in the pHL of acidic vesicles have not been reported.
Corroborating our egg homogenate studies (8), the luminal pH of acidic organelles in intact eggs is coupled to both fertilization and NAADP-induced Ca2+ release with a prompt alkalinization. We would argue that our assays of pHL are reliable because similar results were ratiometrically recorded with both acridine orange, which has been well characterized in this system (8, 10), as well as with Lysosensor Yellow/Blue DND-160. Importantly, pHL changes were clearly independent of exocytosis/endocytosis and cytosolic pH changes. Moreover, acridine orange is unlikely to be responding to the oxidative burst at fertilization because this initiates much later, 2-3 min after insemination (19, 22-25), and direct addition of H2O2 (10 µM to 1 mM) to eggs did not induce a pHLASH (data not shown). Taken together, our data strongly support an alkalinization of cortical vesicles.
Spatial Characterization of the pHL Response—Fertilization evoked a spatially heterogeneous change in organellar pH, with a rapid, cortical alkalinization followed by a central, slow acidification. Only the latter was previously detected in asynchronous populations of eggs (10), hardly surprising when the transient pHLASH only extends 15-25 µm into the cortex (in an egg
120 µm in diameter). Moreover, alkalinization propagated as a wave around the egg cortex at
5 µm/s, a velocity similar to the main [Ca2+]i wave and the exocytotic lifting of the fertilization envelope (26, 27). At higher magnification, the alkalinization wave was manifest as the summation of smaller events (pHLARES, 2-3 µm in diameter) that appear to represent alkalinization at the individual vesicle level.
|
|
Why the fertilization pHLASH is restricted to the egg cortex is not entirely clear but might reflect either localized messenger accumulation or a unique property of the acidic stores themselves. Our data are more consistent with the latter because global NAADP microinjection evoked a local pHLASH, and it is known that the cortical Ca2+ stores are the most sensitive to NAADP (31, 32). Nonetheless, we cannot formally exclude local messenger production as a contributory factor at fertilization.
Temporal Characterization of the pHLash—Despite the spatial similarity of the pHLASH and Ca2+ cortical flash, there was no temporal overlap, and the pHLASH occurred with or just after the main Ca2+ wave,
35 s later. However, this timing makes sense because it coincides with NAADP-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (5). Indeed, both the pHLASH and main Ca2+ response propagate as waves, which is additional evidence for their being interrelated phenomena. Note that the difference in the upstroke kinetics of the Ca2+ and pHL changes in intact eggs is consistent with those observed in homogenate (8).
We were concerned that the pHLASH may be related to Ca2+-stimulated exocytosis, which occurs 6-8 s after the main [Ca2+]i rise in urchin eggs (13, 33) and which alkalinizes cortical granules upon plasmalemmal fusion (12, 14). Our conclusion is that the pHLASH is not due to exocytosis based on the following evidence: (a) Deeper pHL events are too remote to be due to fusion with the plasma membrane, although it might be argued that these deeper pHLARES artifactually represents the "tail" of exocytotic events emanating from out of the plane of focus, recording from thin optical slices (2-3% of the egg diameter) at the egg equator means that the curvature of the plasma membrane is minimal, and out-of-focus cortical granules will not overlap this in-focus region. In addition, the amplitude and upstroke kinetics of the pHLASH are well maintained over 15-25 µm, which is inconsistent with the tail of out-of-focus events, which would be blunted; (b) Exocytosis and pHL changes can be divorced, at the level of individual eggs, as well as by mastoparan, which stimulated cortical granule exocytosis but no pHLASH. Therefore, the approximate post-fertilization sequence of events is Ca2+ cortical flash >> main Ca2+ wave
pHLASH > exocytosis (Fig. 7).
Not only do we describe a novel fertilization pHL event, but we also offer a mechanism whereby sperm elevate NAADP levels in the egg (5), which in turn raise pHL via activation of the Ca2+-mobilizing NAADP receptor on acidic vesicles (8) (Fig. 7). Moreover, we reveal that the unique spatial profile of the pHLASH reflects the intrinsic nature of the cortical stores themselves rather than some upstream mechanism. We also conclude that vesicle alkalinization is independent of changes in cytosolic Ca2+, vesicular membrane potential, H+-ATPase activity (8), cytosolic pH, and exocytosis and appears to be at the level of NAADP-induced changes in H+ buffering (8).
The importance of the egg cortex for egg function is underscored by many cell biological aspects (reviewed in Ref. 34). In addition to supporting layers of exocytotic vesicle populations (30), it also hosts the [Ca2+]i cortical flash (4, 5), a unique tubular endoplasmic reticulum morphology with an exclusive complement of luminal Ca2+-binding proteins (35, 36), as well as a greater density of ryanodine receptors (37). To this and other properties, we add the fertilization-dependent alkalinization of NAADP-sensitive acidic Ca2+ stores. The regulation of organelle pH by activation of the NAADP receptor on the vesicle membrane poses exciting questions relating not just to sea urchin biology but also to mammalian biology. Certainly, key enzymes in the lumen of egg vesicles are regulated by pH changes at fertilization (14, 38), but in the acidic organelles of mammalian cells, luminal pH influences processes as diverse as secretory vesicle fusion (39), autophagy (40), and proteolysis (41). Our results may have far-reaching implications for NAADP regulating various cellular pathways via pH and not just by Ca2+.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Fig. S1. ![]()
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Mansfield Rd., Oxford OX1 3QT, UK. Tel.: 44-1865-271606; Fax: 44-1865-271853; E-mail: Anthony.morgan{at}pharm.ox.ac.uk.
2 The abbreviations used are: NAADP, nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate; ASW, artificial sea water; pHL, luminal pH; pHLASH, cortical pHL response; pHLARES, elemental pHL events; ROI, region of interest; NHE, sodium-proton exchanger. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Wong and G. M. Wessel Extracellular matrix modifications at fertilization: regulation of dityrosine crosslinking by transamidation Development, June 1, 2009; 136(11): 1835 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |