JBC Connect with Cosmo for Collagen Detection

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M608342200 on December 19, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 8, 5143-5151, February 23, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/8/5143    most recent
M608342200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Léveillé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mourad, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Léveillé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mourad, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

CD40 Ligand Binds to {alpha}5beta1 Integrin and Triggers Cell Signaling*

Claire Léveillé{ddagger}§1, Marlène Bouillon{ddagger}1, Wen Guo{ddagger}§1, Julie Bolduc{ddagger}, Ehssan Sharif-Askari§2, Youssef El-Fakhry{ddagger}, Carlos Reyes-Moreno{ddagger}, Rejean Lapointe**, Yahye Merhi{ddagger}{ddagger}, John A. Wilkins§§, and Walid Mourad{ddagger}§3

From the {ddagger}Centre de Recherche en Rhumatologie et Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec G1V 4G2, the §Laboratoire d'immunologie cellulaire et moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Hôpital Saint-Luc, Montréal, Quebec H2X 1P1, the **Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Quebec H2W 1T8, the {ddagger}{ddagger}Institut de Recherche en cardiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H1T 1C8, the §§Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Rheumatic Diseases Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3P4, and the Département de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 3J7, Canada

Received for publication, August 31, 2006 , and in revised form, November 27, 2006.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
It was originally thought that the critical role of the CD40 ligand (CD40L) in normal and inflammatory immune responses was mainly mediated through its interaction with the classic receptor, CD40. However, data from CD40L–/– and CD40–/– mice suggest that the CD40L-induced inflammatory immune response involves at least one other receptor. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that CD40L stabilizes arterial thrombi through an {alpha}IIbbeta3-dependent mechanism. Here we provide evidence that soluble CD40L (sCD40L) binds to cells of the undifferentiated human monocytic U937 cell line in a CD40- and {alpha}IIbbeta3-independent manner. Binding of sCD40L to U937 cells was inhibited by anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody 5C8, anti-{alpha}5beta1 monoclonal antibody P1D6, and soluble {alpha}5beta1. The direct binding of sCD40L to purified {alpha}5beta1 was confirmed in a solid phase binding assay. Binding of sCD40L to {alpha}5beta1 was modulated by the form of {alpha}5beta1 expressed on the cell surface as the activation of {alpha}5beta1 by Mn2+ or dithiothreitol resulted in the loss of sCD40L binding. Moreover, sCD40L induced the translocation of {alpha}5beta1 to the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction of U937 cells, the rapid activation of the MAPK pathways ERK1/2, and interleukin-8 gene expression. The binding of sCD40L to CD40 on BJAB cells, an {alpha}5beta1-negative B cell line, and the resulting activation of ERK1/2 was not inhibited by soluble {alpha}5beta1, suggesting that sCD40L can bind concomitantly to both receptors. These results document the existence of novel CD40L-dependent pathways of physiological relevance for cells expressing multiple receptors (CD40, {alpha}5beta1, and {alpha}IIbbeta3) for CD40L.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The CD40 ligand (CD40L),4 also known as CD154 or gp39, is a type II transmembrane protein that belongs to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily and is expressed on a variety of hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells. The main sources of CD154 are activated platelets and CD4+ T cells (1). CD154 is also variably expressed on activated CD8+ T cells, activated B cells, eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, monocytes, and macrophages as well as endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and smooth muscle cells (reviewed in Ref. 2). Expression of CD40L differs according to cell types and type of stimuli (2). The expression of CD154 is inducible, and its expression on T cells is triggered primarily by T cell receptor signaling and is regulated by CD28-dependent and independent pathways (3) CD40L is stored in platelets and a subpopulation of T cells and rapidly translocates to the cell membrane following T cell and platelet activation (4, 5). A soluble form of biologically active CD40L trimer (sCD40L) is present in the supernatant of activated T cells (6) and platelets (7) and results from the proteolytic cleavage of the homotrimeric CD40L by a metalloproteinase (7).

It was originally thought that CD40L had only one receptor, CD40, which is a type I transmembrane protein that is a member of the TNF receptor superfamily. CD40 is expressed on the surface of many immune and non-immune cells, including B lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages, and dendritic cells, as well as platelets, epithelial, and endothelial cells (8). Most biological functions of CD40L have been attributed to its direct interaction with CD40. However, studies using CD40L–/– and CD40–/– mice have suggested that CD40L may also bind to one or more other receptors (9). In support of this hypothesis, it has been elegantly demonstrated that sCD40L interacts with {alpha}IIbbeta3 (GPIIb/IIIa), an integrin expressed on platelets (10), triggering outside-in signaling and inducing platelet activation and spreading (11). CD40L–/– mice exhibit increased bleeding time (12) and reduced thrombus stability (10), showing that the interaction between sCD40L and the integrin {alpha}IIbbeta3 is physiologically relevant.

Based on the above observations, we hypothesized that CD40L may bind to another still unknown receptor on human monocytes and induce cellular activation. Our results show that sCD40L binds to CD40-negative human monocytic U937 cells, an interaction that is inhibited by anti-{alpha}5beta1 integrin (VLA-5) mAb as well as by soluble {alpha}5beta1 integrin (s{alpha}5beta1). The binding of sCD40L to immobilized purified {alpha}5beta1 confirms the direct interaction of sCD40L with this integrin. sCD40L induces the translocation of {alpha}5beta1 to the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction, the rapid activation of MAPKs ERK1/2 in U937 cells, and IL-8 gene expression, confirming the existence of a third functional receptor for CD40L on {alpha}5beta1.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cells—The myelomonocytic cell line U937 (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and the B cell lymphoma cell line BJAB (from Dr. J. Menezes, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada) were maintained in RPMI 1640 containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin (Wisent, St-Bruno, Quebec, Canada).

Reagents and Antibodies—Recombinant trimeric soluble CD40L (rsCD40L) (13) was provided by Immunex Corp. (Seattle, OR). Avidin was procured from Sigma. Alexa Fluor-488 labeling of rsCD40L (rsCD40L-A) and avidin (avidin-A) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Anti-CD40L hybridoma 5C8 (IgG2a) and anti-CD40 hybridoma G28.5 (IgG1) were obtained from the ATCC. The isotype controls anti-TSST-1 mAb 2H8 (IgG1) and anti-SEB mAb 8C12 (IgG2a) were developed in our laboratory. Anti-{alpha}5beta1 mAb HA5 (IgG2b) and isotype control mouse mAb IgG2b were generously provided by Dr. Bosco Chan (Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada). Anti-beta1 mAb B44 has been previously described (14). The following antibodies were purchased: rabbit anti-{alpha}5 antibody (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), anti-{alpha}5 mAb P1D6 (IgG3) (Biomeda, Foster City, CA), and isotype control IgG3 anti-bacterial peptidoglycan MAB983 (Chemicon), goat anti-mouse IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate antibody (Sigma), rabbit antiphospho-ERK1/2 and anti-ERK1/2 antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA), goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP antibody and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and anti-CD40 mAb 82102 (IgG1) (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Soluble {alpha}5beta1 (s{alpha}5beta1), s{alpha}Vbeta3, and s{alpha}Vbeta5 were produced as previously described (15, 16). Recombinant soluble CD40-Fc was from R & D Systems.

Flow Cytometric Analysis—For the rsCD40L-A binding assay, cells were incubated in binding assay medium (RPMI 1640, HEPES 10 mM, BSA 1%) containing 200 ng of rsCD40L-A or avidin-A (2 x 105 cells/100 µl) for 1 h at 37 °C in a humidified incubator and a 5% CO2 atmosphere. For competition binding with mAbs directed against cell surface molecules (CD40 and {alpha}5beta1), cells (preincubated with 10 µg of human IgG/106 cells in staining medium for 15 min at 37 °C) were incubated with mAb for 30 min at 37 °C prior to labeling with rsCD40L-A. For competition binding with s{alpha}5beta1 or mAbs (10-fold molar excess) directed against soluble molecules, rsCD40L-A and avidin-A were incubated with s{alpha}5beta1 or mAbs for 1 h at 37 °C prior to the addition of the cells. Cell surface analyses with mAbs were performed as previously described (17). Washed cells were analyzed on a FACSort (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA).

Integrin Activation—Cells (106/ml HBSS) were incubated with Mn2+ (1 mM in HBSS) or DTT (10) mM in HBSS) for 30 min at room temperature. The DTT-treated cells then were washed twice in HBSS and resuspended in HBSS. The Mn2+-stimulated cells were used without washing.

Cell Binding Assay—The wells of microtiter plates (Nunc Maxisorp, VWR International Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) were coated with gelatin (30 mg/ml in PBS) for 2 h at 37 °C. Unbound gelatin was removed, and the wells were air-dried for 1 h at 37 °C. Fibronectin (5 µg/ml in PBS, Chemicon) was added to the wells, and the plates were incubated overnight at 4 °C. The wells were washed with PBS and blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Control wells were coated with gelatin and BSA. Cells (5 x 104 cells/well in PBS) were added to the wells, and the plates were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Unbound cells were removed, and the wells were washed three times with PBS under mild agitation. Bound cells were analyzed under a microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 100, Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY) and photographed with a 3-CCD Color video camera, model DXC-390P (Sony Electronics Inc., Park Ridge, NJ). The images were analyzed with Northern Eclipse 6.0 software (Empix Imaging Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The adherent cells were then fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature and stained with 0.5% crystal violet in 20% methanol. After thoroughly washing the wells with tap water, the cells were lysed with 1% SDS in water, and the absorbance at 595 nm (Thermomax microplate reader, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) was determined.

Solid Phase Binding Assay—The wells of microtiter plates (Nunc Maxisorb) were coated with 4 µg/ml of purified s{alpha}5beta1, {alpha}Vbeta3, {alpha}Vbeta5, or soluble recombinant CD40-Fc in PBS (pH 7.5, 50 µl/well) overnight at room temperature. After three washes with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T), the wells were blocked with 0.5% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes with PBS-T, rsCD40L was added to the wells at the indicated concentration, and the plate was incubated for 3 h at room temperature. The wells were washed three times with PBS-T, and bound rsCD40L was detected using goat anti-CD40L-biotin (R & D Systems, 2 h, at room temperature) and streptavidin-HRP (Sigma, 2 h, at room temperature), and revealed with 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine substrate (Sigma).

Cell Stimulation—U937 and BJAB cells were incubated in serum-free medium for 4 h at 37°C and stimulated with rsCD40L (250 ng/5 x 105 cells) for 5 and 15 min at 37 °C. The stimulation was stopped by the addition of hot 2x SDS sample buffer containing 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science) and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma). After boiling for 7 min, cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE for Western blot analysis.

Receptor Translocation to the Cytoskeleton—U937 and BJAB cells were stimulated with rsCD40L (250 ng/5 x 105 cells) for 30 min at 37 °C in binding assay medium and washed three times in PBS. Cells were lysed in Triton X-100 buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1x complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science), and 1% Triton X-100 (Fisher Scientific) for 30 min on ice. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 15 min at 4 °C. Soluble and insoluble fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions and analyzed by immunoblotting.


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.
rsCD40L bound to U937 cells in a CD40-independent manner. A, flow cytometric analysis of CD40 surface expression. Cells were stained with anti-CD40 mAb G28.5 or isotype control anti-TSST1 mAb 2H8 followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG antibody. BJAB cells were used as a positive control. B, rsCD40L-A bound to CD40-negative U937 cells. Cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with rsCD40L-A in the presence (sCD40L; 10-fold molar excess) or absence of unlabeled rsCD40L, washed, and analyzed by FACS. Avidin-A was used as a control. C, neutralizing anti-CD40L mAb 5C8 prevented the binding of rsCD40L-A to BJAB and U937 cells. rsCD40L-A and avidin-A were incubated with mAb 5C8 or isotype control for 30 min at 37 °C prior to the addition of BJAB and U937 cells. Similar results were obtained with avidin-A plus isotype control and avidin-A plus 5C8 (AVIDIN-A). D, blocking anti-CD40 mAb 82102 did not prevent the binding of rsCD40L-A to U937 cells. Cells were incubated with a saturating amount of mAb 82102 prior to incubation with rsCD40L-A or avidin-A. This figure is representative of three independent experiments.

 
Immunoblot Analysis—Polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were blocked in BLOTTO (5% skim milk in Tris saline, pH 7.5, 0.15% Tween 20, Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature, and then incubated with rabbit anti-{alpha}5 antibody overnight at 4 °C followed by goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP antibody or with mouse anti-CD40 antibody overnight at 4 °C followed by goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP antibody. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was assessed by immunoblotting using phospho-specific Abs according to the manufacturer's instructions. Membranes were stripped (62 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS/100 mM, 2-mercaptoethanol, 30 min, 50 °C) and reprobed with antibody recognizing total ERK1/2. Antigen-antibody complexes were revealed with ECL (GE Healthcare, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada).

Analysis of IL-8 mRNA Expression—U937 cells (2 x 106 cells/100 µl) were treated with 100 ng of rsCD40L in RPMI 5% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C for the indicated time points. Reactions were stopped by adding ice-cold RPMI, and cells were isolated by spinning at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C. Total RNA was prepared from each sample using the RNeasy total RNA isolation Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Single strand cDNA for a PCR template was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using a primer, oligo(dT)12–18 (Invitrogen), and superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) under the conditions indicated by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription was inactivated at 95 °C for 5 min, and the products were kept on ice until needed for the PCR. Specific primers were designed from cDNA sequence for IL-8 and beta-actin. Each cDNA was amplified by PCR using TaqDNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The sequences of the primers were as follows: IL-8F (5'-GCCAAGGAGTGCTAAAGAAC-3'), IL-8R (5'-CACTGGCATCTTCACTGATTCTTG-3'), beta-actin F (5'-AATCTGGCACCACACCTTCT-3'), and beta-actin R (5'-TAATGTCACGCACGATTTCC-3'). Conditions for PCR were 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and the 72 °C for 1 min. Additional 10 min of 72 °C was performed at the end of the PCR reaction. The products were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. The expected sizes of the PCR products for IL-8 and beta-actin were 280 and 400 bp, respectively. We did not detect any band when we performed PCR without adding the cDNA template in this study. Genomic DNA contaminants were examined by performing PCR reaction on 1 µg of total RNA at similar conditions, and no contaminants were detected. Densitometric analyses were performed on each detected band using a Molecular Imager Gel Doc System and Quantity One analysis software from Bio-Rad. Results shown are normalized for two conditions, first based on beta-actin levels at each time points and thereafter, based on the level of expression of each gene of samples indicated as time 0 (non-treated samples). The ratio was then blotted as -fold increase of IL-8 mRNA after rsCD40L treatment versus time of the treatment.


Figure 2
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.
rsCD40L-A binding to {alpha}5beta1-positive U937 cells but not to {alpha}5beta1-negative BJAB cells was prevented by soluble {alpha}5beta1 (s{alpha}5beta1) and anti-{alpha}5 mAb P1D6. A, flow cytometric analysis of {alpha}5beta1 integrin surface expression. Cells were incubated with anti-{alpha}5beta1 mAb HA5 or isotype control mAb followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG Ab and analyzed by FACS. B, soluble {alpha}5beta1 prevented the binding of rsCD40L-A to U937 cells but not to BJAB cells. rsCD40L-A was preincubated with s{alpha}5beta1 (10-fold molar excess) or not for 1 h at 37 °C prior to the addition of cells. Similar results were obtained with avidin-A and avidin-A plus s{alpha}5beta1 (avidin-A). C, preincubation of U937 cells with anti-{alpha}5beta1 mAb P1D6 significantly prevented the binding of rsCD40L-A. Cells were incubated with mAb P1D6 or an isotype control (IgG3) for 30 min at 37 °C. Avidin-A or rsCD40L-A was then added, and the incubation continued for 1 h at 37°C. This figure is representative of three independent experiments.

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
rsCD40L-A Bound to CD40-negative U937 Cells—In an attempt to identify a novel receptor for CD40L, we first analyzed the expression of CD40 by flow cytometry and immunoblotting using various cell lines, and selected CD40-negative cell lines that could bind Alexa Fluorlabeled rsCD40L (rsCD40L-A). The CD40-positive human BJAB B cell line was used as a control. The undifferentiated monocytic U937 cell line did not express CD40, as assessed by flow cytometry (Fig. 1A) and immunoblotting (data not shown) but was able to bind rsCD40L-A at a level similar to that observed on BJAB cells (Fig. 1B). The specificity of this binding was confirmed by adding a 10-fold molar excess of unlabeled rsCD40L (Fig. 1B) or by preincubating rsCD40L with the anti-CD40L mAb 5C8 (Fig. C). Similar results were obtained with the CD40-negative erythroleukemic K562 and HEK 293 cell lines (data not shown). Based on these results, we looked for strong evidence of rsCD40L binding to U937 cells in a CD40-independent manner. Fig. 1D shows that preincubation of U937 cells with blocking anti-CD40 mAb 82102 did not interfere with the binding of rsCD40L-A, whereas the same treatment completely prevented the binding of rsCD40L-A to BJAB cells. These results indicated that U937 cells express at least one molecule that is distinct from CD40 and that acts as a receptor for sCD40L. They also confirmed that CD40 is the sole receptor for CD40L on BJAB cells.

rsCD40L Bound to {alpha}5beta1—Based on the above results, and because sCD40L also binds to {alpha}IIbbeta3 (10, 11), which is selectively expressed on platelets (18), hematopoietic progenitors (19), and mast cells (20) but not on U937 cells (data not shown), we hypothesized that binding of rsCD40L to U937 cells may also be mediated by other members of the integrin superfamily. We first looked for integrin superfamily members that are expressed on U937, K562, and HEK 293 cells but not on BJAB cells. Among others, we found that {alpha}5beta1 was expressed constitutively on U937 cells (Fig. 2A), K562 cells (data not shown) (21), and HEK 293 cells (data not shown) (22) but not on BJAB cells (Fig. 2A). To determine whether rsCD40L-A could bind to {alpha}5beta1, we performed a competitive binding assay using soluble {alpha}5beta1 (s{alpha}5beta1) as bait for rsCD40L-A. Fig. 2B shows that preincubation of rsCD40L-A with s{alpha}5beta1 substantially inhibited the binding of rsCD40L-A to U937 cells. Preincubation of rsCD40L-A with s{alpha}5beta1 did not affect rsCD40L-A binding to CD40 on B cells, suggesting that sCD40L could bind concomitantly to both CD40 and {alpha}5beta1.


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.
Immobilized purified {alpha}5beta1 bound to rsCD40L. A, rsCD40L bound to recombinant soluble CD40-Fc in a dose-dependent manner in a solid phase binding assay. The wells of microtiter plates were coated with 4 µg/ml recombinant soluble CD40-Fc (squares) or with BSA alone (dots) as a control. rsCD40L binding was detected with anti-CD40L-biotin antibody and streptavidin-HRP and was revealed with TMB. B, {alpha}5beta1 was a receptor for rsCD40L. The wells of microtiter plates were coated with purified s{alpha}5beta1 (4 µg/ml) (squares) or BSA (2%) (dots), and rsCD40L was added at the indicated concentrations. Bound rsCD40L was detected as above. C, {alpha}Vbeta3 is not a receptor for rsCD40L. The wells of microtiter plates were coated with purified {alpha}Vbeta3 (4 µg/ml) (squares) or BSA (2%) (dots), and rsCD40L was added at the indicated concentrations. Bound rsCD40L was detected as above. D, {alpha}Vbeta5 is not a receptor for rsCD40L. The wells of microtiter plates were coated with purified {alpha}Vbeta5 (4 µg/ml) (squares) or BSA (2%) (dots), and rsCD40L was added at the indicated concentrations. Bound rsCD40L was detected as above. The results presented in this figure (mean value of duplicate wells) are representative of three independent experiments. S.D. was <10% of the mean.

 
To provide further support for the notion that {alpha}5beta1 is involved in the binding of rsCD40L to U937 cells, cells were preincubated with anti-{alpha}5 mAb P1D6 or isotype control mAb and then incubated with rsCD40L-A. Fig. 2C shows that mAb P1D6 inhibited the interaction of rsCD40L-A to U937 cells but, as expected, did not affect the binding of rsCD40L-A to {alpha}5beta1-negative BJAB cells. Thus, the results presented here support our contention that {alpha}5beta1 is the third receptor for sCD40L.

Lastly, to confirm that sCD40L binds directly to {alpha}5beta1, a solid phase binding assay was developed using immobilized soluble CD40-Fc as a control receptor (Fig. 3A). The results presented in Fig. 3B clearly demonstrate that rsCD40L binds directly to purified {alpha}5beta1 in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, rsCD40L did not bind to other purified integrins, {alpha}Vbeta3 (Fig. 3C) and {alpha}Vbeta5 (Fig. 3D), confirming the specificity of the rsCD40L-{alpha}5beta1 interaction. Thus, {alpha}5beta1, like CD40 and {alpha}IIbbeta3, is a receptor for sCD40L.

Chemical Agents That Increase the Affinity of {alpha}5beta1 for Fibronectin Negatively Affected the Binding of rsCD40L to U937 Cells{alpha}5beta1 is constitutively expressed on the cell surface in an inactive form that cannot bind fibronectin (reviewed in Ref. 23). Conformational changes triggered by outside-in or inside-out signaling result in the activation of the integrin (23) allowing it to bind to its natural ligand. Chemical agents such as Mn2+ and DTT can promote such changes (21). We wondered whether the activation of {alpha}5beta1 integrin could also modulate the binding of rsCD40L to U937 cells. First, we confirmed that U937 cells did not constitutively bind to fibronectin and that Mn2+ and DTT strongly promoted their adhesion to fibronectin as evaluated by microscopy (Fig. 4A) and a colorimetric assay (Fig. 4B). In contrast, similar treatments of {alpha}5beta1-negative BJAB cells did not promote their attachment to fibronectin (Fig. 4). Second, conformational changes induced by these chemical agents expose a beta1 epitope, the mAb B44 epitope (21). Indeed, the results presented in Fig. 5A show that treatments with Mn2+ or DTT induced the expression of the B44 epitope on U937 cells but not on BJAB cells. We then assessed the binding of rsCD40L-A to U937 cells treated with Mn2+ or DTT. Interestingly, the treatment of U937 cells with Mn2+ reduced the binding of rsCD40L-A while the treatment with DTT almost completely inhibited the binding of rsCD40L-A to U937 cells (Fig. 5B). In contrast, similar treatments of BJAB cells had no effect on the binding of rsCD40L-A to CD40 (Fig. 5B). Thus, changes in the conformation of {alpha}5beta1 that promote its binding to fibronectin prevent its interaction with sCD40L.

rsCD40L Induced {alpha}5beta1 Recruitment to the Cytoskeleton in CD40-negative U937 Cells—One consequence of the binding of beta1 integrins with their ligands is their association with the cell cytoskeleton (24). We thus looked at whether the interaction of rsCD40L with {alpha}5beta1 would also result in its association with the cytoskeleton. To assess the recruitment of {alpha}5beta1 to the cytoskeleton, cells were incubated with rsCD40L for 30 min at 37 °C and solubilized in Triton X-100 buffer. The soluble (Sol) and insoluble (Ins) fractions were separated by centrifugation and analyzed by immunoblotting with a rabbit polyclonal anti-{alpha}5 Ab (Fig. 6A). {alpha}5beta1 was found exclusively in the Triton X-100-soluble fraction of unstimulated U937 cells, whereas a significant amount of {alpha}5beta1 translocated into the Triton-X-100-insoluble fraction of rsCD40L-stimulated U937 cells. As expected, rsCD40L induced the translocation of CD40 to the detergentinsoluble fraction of BJAB B cells (25) and the formation of CD40 homodimers (26) (Fig. 6B). Thus, like its natural ligand, fibronectin, the interaction of rsCD40L with {alpha}5beta1 triggered its association with the cytoskeleton.


Figure 4
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.
Mn2+ and DTT treatments induced the adherence of U937 cells but not BJAB cells to fibronectin. A, cells were treated with Mn2+ (1 mM) or DTT (10 mM) or not for 30 min at room temperature. Washed cells were then added to fibronectin-coated wells and allowed to adhere for 1 h at 37 °C. After removing unbound cells, adherence was assessed using a Zeiss microscope. B, colorimetric evaluation of cells adhering to fibronectin. Treated or untreated cells were tested for their adherence to immobilized fibronectin as described above. After removing unbound cells, a colorimetric assay was used as described under "Experimental Procedures" to evaluate the adherence of U937 and BJAB cells to fibronectin. These results are representative of four independent experiments.

 
rsCD40L Induced the Activation of the ERK1/2 Pathway in CD40-negative U937 Cells—The above results prompted us to investigate signal-transducing events triggered by the engagement of {alpha}5beta1 by rsCD40L. The stimulation of monocytes with membrane CD40L or sCD40L induces the activation of the MAPK pathways ERK1 and -2 (2729). The binding of ligand to {alpha}5beta1 also induces the activation of MAPK pathways (30). We thus investigated the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in U937 cells following stimulation with rsCD40L and found, as shown in Fig. 7A, that ERK1/2 was rapidly phosphorylated in rsCD40L-activated U937 cells. As expected (31), rsCD40L induced the activation of ERK1/2 in BJAB cells (Fig. 7A). These results indicated that, like its classic ligand fibronectin, the interaction of sCD40L with {alpha}5beta1 triggers the activation of signaling pathways, confirming the functional status of this interaction.

Interaction between s{alpha}5beta1 and rsCD40L Did Not Interfere with the CD40L-induced Activation of ERK1/2 via CD40—We showed above by flow cytometry analysis that purified s{alpha}5beta1 prevented the interaction of rsCD40L with U937 cells. As expected, the interaction of rsCD40L with s{alpha}5beta1 also completely prevented the activation of the ERK1/2 in U937 cells (Fig. 7B). An interesting outcome of the binding experiments was the observation that rsCD40L may interact concomitantly with CD40 and {alpha}5beta1 (Fig. 2B). This suggested that sCD40L bound to {alpha}5beta1 can trigger signaling in CD40-positive cells. Indeed, our data in Fig. 7B show that rsCD40L bound to s{alpha}5beta1 induced the activation of ERK1/2 in BJAB cells. Thus, sCD40L may serve as a molecular bridge between CD40 and {alpha}5beta1 expressed on two different cells and trigger signal transduction in both cells.

rsCD40L Induced IL-8 Gene Expression in U937 Cells—The interaction of monocytes with fibronectin leads to inflammatory cytokines expression (30, 32), cellular responses that could also be induced in these cells by sCD40L-triggered signaling. To assess the expression of biological mediators, we analyzed IL-8 gene expression in U937 cells stimulated with 100 ng of rsCD40L for 15 min to 4 h. In U937 cells, rsCD40L induced a weak but significant IL-8 gene expression (Fig. 8A), reaching more than a 2.5-fold increase at 2 h (Fig. 8B). Thus, the interaction of sCD40L with cells in a CD40-independent manner also promotes the expression of inflammatory mediators.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We designed this study to examine the ability of sCD40L to bind to cells that do not express its two known receptors, CD40 and {alpha}IIbbeta3, and, if such binding occurs, to identify the new CD40L receptor(s). The main findings of this study are that 1) sCD40L bound to {alpha}5beta1, a widely distributed cell surface receptor, 2) the interaction of sCD40L with {alpha}5beta1 was prevented by conformational changes of {alpha}5beta1 that result in its activation and its binding to fibronectin, 3) binding of sCD40L to {alpha}5beta1 induced signaling, translocation of {alpha}5beta1 to the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction, and chemokine gene expression, and 4) sCD40L may simultaneously bind to CD40 and {alpha}5beta1 on the cell surface. Thus, {alpha}5beta1 is a functional receptor for sCD40L, the third described so far, two being members of the integrin family.

Extensive research over the last decade has documented the central role of CD40L in immune responses (reviewed in Refs. 33 and 34) and in the development of autoimmunity (reviewed in Refs. 35 and 36) and inflammatory disorders (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 37). It became evident that CD40L is not only expressed by activated T cells but also by other cell types following activation, especially in chronic inflammatory diseases and autoimmunity, and that it plays a broader role than initially thought. Indeed, the expression of CD40L by immune cells is augmented and prolonged in many disease conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus (38), rheumatoid arthritis (39, 40), inflammatory bowel disease (37), and cardiovascular disease (41), and is induced in non-immune cells such as fibroblasts (42) and endothelial cells (43). CD40L is also released as a soluble, trimeric, biologically functional molecule, and an increased level of circulating sCD40L is also a feature of many chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions (41, 4446). The importance of CD40L in the development and maintenance of these inflammatory disorders has been demonstrated in mouse models and in a few human studies where an anti-CD40L treatment has been shown to be beneficial (35, 36, 47). CD40, the classic ligand for CD40L, is also expressed on many immune and non-immune cell types in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (2, 36, 37), which supports the contention that the CD154-CD40 axis plays a crucial role in autoimmunity and inflammatory disorders. However, the scope of the role of CD40L in cellular immunity and inflammation is not limited just to its interaction with CD40. André et al. (10, 11) have shown that sCD40L can bind to {alpha}IIbbeta3, triggering platelet activation, and is involved in thrombus stabilization (10, 11). We show here that {alpha}5beta1 is also a functional receptor for sCD40L.


Figure 5
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5.
Treating U937 cells with Mn2+ or DTT exposed the B44 beta1 epitope but decreased the binding of rsCD40L to {alpha}5beta1. A, effects of Mn2+ and DTT treatments of U937 and BJAB cells on B44 beta1 epitope expression. Cells were treated with Mn2+ and DTT as indicated above, and the expression of the B44beta1 epitope was assessed by flow cytometry. B, treatment of U937 cells with Mn2+ or DTT prevented the binding of rsCD40L-A. Cells were treated with Mn2+ or DTT as described above, and the binding of rsCD40L-A was assessed as described in Fig. 1. These results are representative of four independent experiments.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6.
Stimulating U937 cells with rsCD40L led to the recruitment of {alpha}5beta1 into the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction. Cells were stimulated for 30 min at 37 °C with rsCD40L and then lysed in 1% Triton X-100 buffer. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 20 min at 4 °C. Soluble (106 cell equivalents), and insoluble (2 x 106 cell equivalents) fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions and analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-human {alpha}5 (A) and anti-human CD40 (B). This figure is representative of three independent experiments.

 
Like other members of the integrin superfamily, {alpha}5beta1 is a cell surface receptor that binds to the extracellular matrix and, in doing so, provides cells with adhesive properties and a transmembrane link between the extracellular environment and the intracellular cytoskeleton. Ligand binding to integrins triggers signaling pathways such as MAPKs, leading to cytoskeleton organization and regulating cell fate and behavior (4850). Like other integrins, {alpha}5beta1 is not constitutively active and, in that form, cannot bind to fibronectin, its ligand (23). sCD40L, however, binds to inactive {alpha}5beta1, and the activation of {alpha}5beta1 by chemical agents that induce conformational changes in a manner similar to that observed in the ligand-occupied integrin (21) prevents the binding of sCD40L. Thus, although {alpha}5beta1 acts as receptor for fibronectin and sCD40L, these two ligands cannot bind to {alpha}5beta1 simultaneously.

The interaction of {alpha}5beta1 with the ECM or ligation by anti-{alpha}5 antibodies induces the activation of ERK pathways in various cell types, including B cell progenitor cell line (51), fibroblasts (52), chondrocytes (53), and, as shown here, monocytic U937 cells (54). In many cell types such as chondrocytes (55), synovial cells (56), and monocytes (30, 54), signals transduced via {alpha}5beta1 result in cell survival, proliferation, and cytokine and chemokine expression. We show herein that the engagement of {alpha}5beta1 by sCD40L on U937 cells is also functionally relevant, because it induces the activation of ERK signaling pathways and the association of {alpha}5beta1 with the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction. The trimeric nature of rsCD40L (13) and native sCD40L (6, 57) may facilitate the formation of clusters of {alpha}5beta1 that promotes the activation of signaling pathways and the association of {alpha}5beta1 with the cytoskeleton in a manner similar to the ECM (24, 48).

A number of cell types such as monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells express both CD40 and {alpha}5beta1. CD40L is important for macrophage activation as shown by the fact that CD40L knock-out mice have defective T cell-dependent macrophage-driven functions (58). To date, signaling and subsequent cellular responses induced by CD40L in CD40-positive cells have been attributed solely to its interaction with CD40, although in most cases the identity of the CD40L receptor has not been confirmed. The results presented herein point to the need for a reassessment of the contribution of CD40 to these cellular responses. Indeed, stimulation of CD40-positive/{alpha}5beta1-positive monocytes and macrophages with sCD40L or membrane-bound CD40L induces the activation of ERK (27, 28) and the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-{alpha} (27, 28, 59). These cellular responses are also induced in monocytes by fibronectin (30), mainly via its interaction with {alpha}5beta1 (32). The signals induce in U937 cells by sCD40L lead to IL-8 gene expression, which suggests that the CD40L-{alpha}5beta1 interaction in addition to the CD40L-CD40 interaction contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammatory conditions where cells such as neutrophils play a crucial role. Interestingly, vitamin D3-differentated U937 cells have been reported to produce tissue factor in a CD40L-dependent but in a CD40-independent manner when incubated with CD40L+ T cells (60). It is thus tempting to hypothesize that tissue factor is induced in these cells by {alpha}5beta1-mediated signals.


Figure 7
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7.
rsCD40L induced the phosphorylation of pERK1/2 in U937 cells, and this response was prevented by s{alpha}5beta1. A, cells (5 x 105) were stimulated at 37 °C with rsCD40L in serum-free medium and then lysed in 2x SDS sample buffer at the indicated time points. B, rsCD40L was incubated with soluble {alpha}5beta1 (+s{alpha}5beta1) or not for 1 h at 37 °C before adding the cells (5 x 105) in serum-free medium. After 5 min at 37 °C, the cells were centrifuged and lysed in 1x SDS sample buffer. Immunoblotting was performed with Abs specific for phosphorylated ERK1/2 and reprobed with Abs specific for total ERK1/2. This figure is representative of three independent experiments.

 
An interesting finding is that sCD40L can bind to {alpha}5beta1 and CD40 simultaneously, as shown by cell binding and cell activation experiments in BJAB cells. The CD40 binding site has been mapped to the interface between adjacent CD40L monomers (61). The simultaneous binding of {alpha}5beta1 and CD40 to sCD40L suggests that sCD40L interacts with {alpha}5beta1 outside the CD40 binding site. These results raise the possibility that sCD40L trimers may serve as a molecular bridge between CD40 and {alpha}5beta1 expressed on various cells types, triggering signal transduction in such cells, or may cross-link the two receptors expressed on the same cell, triggering signaling-related events via both the receptors.

Thus, the responses of monocytes as well as other CD40-positive and {alpha}5beta1-positive cell types to sCD40L may be induced through both CD40 and {alpha}5beta1 individually or in combination. The signaling pathways and subsequent cellular responses triggered by sCD40L would depend on the availability of the various receptors for interactions with sCD40L. For example, platelets express all three receptors for sCD40L that have been identified to date (CD40, {alpha}5beta1, and {alpha}IIbbeta3). Platelets are also the major source of circulating sCD40L (1) and, through their cell surface expression and release of CD40L, can play an important role in the immune response (62) and in inflammation (63). The roles played by each of three sCD40L receptors in platelet activation remain to be determined. Moreover, the expression of {alpha}IIbbeta3 is not restricted to platelets and their progenitors as was recently shown with hematopoietic progenitors (64) and mast cells (20), which also expressed {alpha}5beta1 (65). Like platelets, activated mast cells express both integrins {alpha}5beta1 and {alpha}IIbbeta3, and CD40L (66), and could be activated via {alpha}5beta1 and {alpha}IIbbeta3 following their interaction with CD40L. {alpha}5beta1, through its interaction with sCD40L, may play an important role in immune and inflammatory responses, because this integrin is broadly expressed (67). This possibility is currently under investigation in our laboratory. Given the important role of CD40L in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, the identification of {alpha}5beta1 as a new sCD40L receptor may turn out to be crucial in understanding the development of these diseases and may lead to the development of potential new strategies to counter them.


Figure 8
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 8.
rsCD40L induced IL-8 gene expression in U937 cells. Cells were stimulated with 100 ng of rsCD40L for 15, 60, 120, and 240 min at 37 °C. Cells were then harvested, total RNA was extracted, and IL-8 gene expression was analyzed by reverse transcription-PCR. A, PCR products were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized with a Molecular Imager Gel Doc System. B, the fluorescence intensity of PCR product of each sample was considered to evaluate the induced IL-8 gene expression. Results are expressed as -fold increase of normalized fluorescence intensity over that obtained at time 0.

 

    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported in part by grants from the Arthritis Society of Canada, the Canadian Arthritis Network, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

2 Supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec. Back

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Campus St. Luc, Pavillon Edouard-Asselin, 264 boulevard René Lévesque Est, Montréal, Quebec H2X 1P1, Canada. Tel.: 514-890-8000 Ext. 35287; Fax: 514-412-7314; E-mail: MW.Mourad{at}umontreal.ca.

4 The abbreviations used are: CD40L, CD40 ligand; rsCD40L, recombinant soluble CD40L; rsCD40L-A, Alexa Fluor 488-labeled rsCD40L; avidin-A, Alexa Fluor 488-labeled avidin; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; s{alpha}5beta1, soluble {alpha}5beta1; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; mAb, monoclonal antibody; IL-8, interleukin-8; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; BSA, bovine serum albumin; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; DTT, dithiothreitol; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Manjit Singh Rana for his valuable comments.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Andre, P., Nannizzi-Alaimo, L., Prasad, S. K., and Phillips, D. R. (2002) Circulation 106, 896–899
  2. Schonbeck, U., and Libby, P. (2001) Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58, 4–43[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ding, L., Green, J., Thompson, C., and Shevach, E. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 5124–5132[Abstract]
  4. Casamayor-Palleja, M., Khan, M., and MacLennan, I. C. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 1293–1301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Henn, V., Slupsky, J. R., Grafe, M., Anagnostopoulos, I., Forster, R., Muller-Berghaus, G., and Kroczek, R. A. (1998) Nature 391, 591–594[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Pietravalle, F., Lecoanet-Henchoz, S., Blasey, H., Aubry, J. P., Elson, G., Edgerton, M. D., Bonnefoy, J. Y., and Gauchat, J. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5965–5967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jin, Y., Nonoyama, S., Morio, T., Imai, K., Ochs, H. D., and Mizutani, S. (2001) J. Med. Dent. Sci. 48, 23–27[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Grammer, A. C., and Lipsky, P. E. (2000) Adv. Immunol. 76, 61–178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Mehlhop, P. D., van de Rijn, M., Brewer, J. P., Kisselgof, A. B., Geha, R. S., Oettgen, H. C., and Martin, T. R. (2000) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 23, 646–651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Andre, P., Prasad, K. S., Denis, C. V., He, M., Papalia, J. M., Hynes, R. O., Phillips, D. R., and Wagner, D. D. (2002) Nat. Med. 8, 247–252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Prasad, K. S., Andre, P., He, M., Bao, M., Manganello, J., and Phillips, D. R. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 12367–12371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Crow, A. R., Leytin, V., Starkey, A. F., Rand, M. L., and Lazarus, A. H. (2003) J. Thromb. Haemost. 1, 850–852[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Morris, A. E., Remmele, R. L., Jr., Klinke, R., Macduff, B. M., Fanslow, W. C., and Armitage, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 418–423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wilkins, J. A., Li, A., Ni, H., Stupack, D. G., and Shen, C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3046–3051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Stupack, D. G., and Cheresh, D. A. (2002) J. Cell Sci. 115, 3729–3738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Krokhin, O. V., Cheng, K., Sousa, S. L., Ens, W., Standing, K. G., and Wilkins, J. A. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 12950–12959[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Leveille, C., Chandad, F., Al-Daccak, R., and Mourad, W. (1999) Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 3516–3526[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Shattil, S. J., and Newman, P. J. (2004) Blood 104, 1606–1615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Emambokus, N. R., and Frampton, J. (2003) Immunity 19, 33–45[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Oki, T., Kitaura, J., Eto, K., Lu, Y., Maeda-Yamamoto, M., Inagaki, N., Nagai, H., Yamanishi, Y., Nakajima, H., Kumagai, H., and Kitamura, T. (2006) J. Immunol. 176, 52–60[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ni, H., Li, A., Simonsen, N., and Wilkins, J. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7981–7987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lishko, V. K., Yakubenko, V. P., and Ugarova, T. P. (2003) Exp. Cell Res. 283, 116–126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Hynes, R. O. (2002) Cell 110, 673–687[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. DeMali, K. A., Wennerberg, K., and Burridge, K. (2003) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 572–582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Hostager, B. S., Catlett, I. M., and Bishop, G. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15392–15398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Reyes-Moreno, C., Girouard, J., Lapointe, R., Darveau, A., and Mourad, W. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 7799–7806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Suttles, J., Milhorn, D. M., Miller, R. W., Poe, J. C., Wahl, L. M., and Stout, R. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5835–5842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pearson, L. L., Castle, B. E., and Kehry, M. R. (2001) Int. Immunol. 13, 273–283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Inoue, Y., Otsuka, T., Niiro, H., Nagano, S., Arinobu, Y., Ogami, E., Akahoshi, M., Miyake, K., Ninomiya, I., Shimizu, S., Nakashima, H., and Harada, M. (2004) J. Immunol. 172, 2147–2154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. de Fougerolles, A. R., and Koteliansky, V. E. (2002) Immunol. Rev. 186, 208–220[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Grammer, A. C., Fischer, R., Lee, O., Zhang, X., and Lipsky, P. E. (2004) Arthritis Res. Ther. 6, 28–38[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Takizawa, T., Nishinarita, S., Kitamura, N., Hayakawa, J., Kang, H., Tomita, Y., Mitamura, K., Yamagami, K., and Horie, T. (1995) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 101, 376–382[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Grewal, I. S., and Flavell, R. A. (1998) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16, 111–135[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. van Kooten, C., and Banchereau, J. (2000) J. Leukoc. Biol. 67, 2–17[Abstract]
  35. Howard, L. M., and Miller, S. D. (2004) Autoimmunity 37, 411–418[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Toubi, E., and Shoenfeld, Y. (2004) Autoimmunity 37, 457–464[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Danese, S., Sans, M., and Fiocchi, C. (2004) Gut 53, 1035–1043[Free Full Text]
  38. Katsiari, C. G., Liossis, S. N., Dimopoulos, A. M., Charalambopoulo, D. V., Mavrikakis, M., and Sfikakis, P. P. (2002) Lupus 11, 370–378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Berner, B., Wolf, G., Hummel, K. M., Muller, G. A., and Reuss-Borst, M. A. (2000) Ann. Rheum. Dis. 59, 190–195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Liu, M. F., Chao, S. C., Wang, C. R., and Lei, H. Y. (2001) Autoimmunity 34, 107–113[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Vishnevetsky, D., Kiyanista, V. A., and Gandhi, P. J. (2004) Ann. Pharmacother. 38, 1500–1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kaufman, J., Sime, P. J., and Phipps, R. P. (2004) J. Immunol. 172, 1862–1871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Wagner, A. H., Guldenzoph, B., Lienenluke, B., and Hecker, M. (2004) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24, 715–720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Danese, S., Katz, J. A., Saibeni, S., Papa, A., Gasbarrini, A., Vecchi, M., and Fiocchi, C. (2003) Gut 52, 1435–1441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Aukrust, P., Damas, J. K., and Solum, N. O. (2004) J. Am. College Cardiol. 43, 2326–2328[Free Full Text]
  46. Goules, A., Tzioufas, A. G., Manousakis, M. N., Kirou, K. A., Crow, M. K., and Routsias, J. G. (2006) J. Autoimmun. 26, 165–171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Sidiropoulos, P. I., and Boumpas, D. T. (2004) Lupus 13, 391–397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Brakebusch, C., and Fassler, R. (2003) EMBO J. 22, 2324–2333[CrossRef][Medline]