![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 9, 6075-6089, March 2, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B Activation Pathways Bifurcate at IL-1 Receptor-associated Kinase Modification*










1
From the
Department of Immunology and the ¶Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, ||Osaka University, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 3-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan, **University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77054, and the
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
Received for publication, September 22, 2006 , and in revised form, December 29, 2006.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation, TAK1-dependent and MEKK3-dependent, respectively. These two pathways bifurcate at the level of IRAK modification. The TAK1-dependent pathway leads to IKK
/
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, resulting in classical NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation and degradation. The TAK1-independent MEKK3-dependent pathway involves IKK
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, resulting in NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation and subsequent dissociation from NF
B but without I
B
degradation. These results provide significant insight to our further understanding of NF
B activation pathways. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-activated kinase 1), a member of the MAPK kinase kinase family, and the proteins that bind to it, TAB1, TAB2, and TAB3, have been implicated in IL-1 signaling (1524). IL-1 failed to activate TAK1 in IRAK-deficient cells, indicating that IRAK is required for the activation of TAK1. IRAK mediates the activation of TAK1 by bringing TRAF6 to form a complex with TAK1-TAB1-TAB2-TAB3, which are shown to be preassociated on the membrane. This membrane-bound IRAK-TRAF6-TAK1-TAB1-TAB2-TAB3 complex has been designated as Complex II (Fig. 1). Through an unknown mechanism, TRAF6-TAK1-TAB1-TAB2-TAB3 (Fig. 1, Complex II) is dissociated from IRAK and translocated from the membrane to the cytosol, where TAK1 is activated.
Chen and co-workers (23, 24) showed that protein ubiquitination plays an important role in TRAF6-mediated TAK1 and IKK activation. TRAF6, a Ring domain protein, has been shown recently to function as a ubiquitin protein ligase E3, and TRAF6 itself is the target of ubiquitination, which has been shown to activate TAK1 through an unknown mechanism. Once activated, TAK1 leads to the phosphorylation of IKK
and MKK6, resulting in the activation of both the JNK and NF
B signaling pathways. In addition to TAK1, MEKK2 and MEKK3 have also been implicated in the activation of IKK and MAPK, leading to the activation of NF
B and JNK (2528). The detailed signaling mechanism is not clear. Recently genetic studies have provided further evidence for an essential role of TAK1 in IL-1 signaling. Two groups (29, 30) independently reported that TAK1 deficiency results in defects in IL-1 signaling. Intriguingly, although IL-1-induced JNK activation was completely abolished, NF
B activation was only partially impaired in TAK1-deficient cells, implicating an additional NF
B activation mechanism for the IL-1 pathway.
Here, through the study of IRAK modification, we uncovered two parallel IL-1-mediated signaling pathways for NF
B activation, TAK1-dependent and MEKK3-dependent pathways, respectively (Fig. 1). These two pathways bifurcate at the level of IRAK modification. The TAK1-dependent pathway leads to IKK
/
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, resulting in classical NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation and degradation. The TAK1-independent MEKK3-dependent pathway involves IKK
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, resulting in NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation and subsequent dissociation from NF
B but without I
B
degradation. These results provide significant insight to our further understanding of NF
B activation pathways.
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B
(Ser32/Ser36), JNK, IKK
/
(Ser176/180), IKK
(Ser376), and total I
B
, JNK, IKK
, and IKK
were purchased from Cell Signaling. Antibody to FLAG (anti-FLAG) was purchased from Sigma. Antibodies against ubiquitin, NF
B, IRAK, and TAK1 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. 293 and IRAK-deficient cells (11), TAK1-deficient MEFs (29), MEKK3-deficient MEFs (26), and IKK
(31), IKK
(32, 33), and IKK
/
-deficient MEFs (34) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin G (100 µg/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). Recombinant Plasmids and TransfectionIRAK phosphorylation and ubiquitination mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis and cloned into FLAG-tagged pCMV vector (Sigma). Oligonucleotides used for making the phosphorylation mutants were as follows: AGCCGCAGCCGCCGCCTTCCTCGCCCCAGCTTTTCCAGGCGCCCAGACCCATT and GGGCGCCTGGAAAAGCTGGGGCGAGGAAGGCGGCGGCTGCGGCTGGCAACTT. Oligonucleotides used for making the ubiquitination mutants were as follows: GCCCCCGGAGGTTGCCATCCTCAGCCTCC and GGATGGCAACCTCCGGGGGCTCCAGGCCTC. Transfection of the indicated plasmids by FuGENE 6 transfection reagents was done as recommended by the manufacturer (Roche Diagnostics).
Coimmunoprecipitation and ImmunoblottingCell were harvested and lysed in a Triton-containing lysis buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaF, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and complete protease inhibitor mixture from Roche Diagnostics). Cell extracts were incubated with 1 µg of antibody or preimmune serum (negative control) for 2 h followed by a 2-h incubation with 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads (prewashed and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline at a 1:1 ratio). After incubation, the beads were washed three or four times with lysis buffer and resuspended in 20 µl of lysis buffer. For immunoblotting, the immunoprecipitates were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore), and analyzed by immunoblotting.
|
/
(for I
B kinase assay) or anti-TAK1 (for TAK1 kinase assay) and collected on protein A-Sepharose beads. Kinase reactions were performed in 50 µl of buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, 10 mCi of [
-32P]ATP at 30 °C for 30 min. The substrate for I
B kinase assay was 2 µg of glutathione S-transferase (GST)-I
B, residues (154 amino acids) (J. DiDonato, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH), whereas the substrate for TAK1 kinase assay was 2 µg of His-MKK6. Samples were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography. For IRAK kinase assay, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-IRAK antibody. Purified recombinant IRAK4 (Upstate) was added to the immunoprecipitates, followed by kinase assay as instructed by the manufacturer.
TAK1 Inhibitor TreatmentThe TAK1 inhibitor (5Z-7-oxozeaenol) was purchased from AnalytiCon Discovery GmbH (catalog number NP-009245). Stock solutions were made up at 10 mM in Me2SO. To block the TAK1 activity, wild type, MEKK3/, or IKK
/ MEFs were pretreated with 600 nM of TAK1 inhibitor for 3 h prior to IL-1
treatment.
Virus InfectionsMEFs were infected with adenovirus (provided by Frank Mercurio at Celgene (San Diego)) expressing either green fluorescent protein (control), IKK
, or kinase-inactive IKK
. The titer of each adenovirus stock used for infection was as follows: green fluorescent protein = 3 x 108, IKK
= 5 x 108, and kinase-inactive IKK
= 1 x 109 virus particles/ml. After 18 h, the infected cells were stimulated with IL-1 or were unstimulated. The production of retrovirus and infection has been described previously (35).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B and JNK activation were greatly reduced in IL-1-treated IRAK-deficient cells, but these responses are restored in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with IRAK, indicating that IRAK is required for both. Analysis of IRAK deletion mutants showed that the truncated IRAK protein DD + UD + C1 (containing the DD, UD, and C1 domains) is sufficient to restore IL-1-induced NF
B and JNK activation in IRAK-deficient cells. Like the full-length IRAK, DD + UD + C1 is phosphorylated after it is recruited to the receptor, subsequently ubiquitinated, and eventually degraded upon IL-1 stimulation (11, 15, 37, 37, 39). Treatment with calf intestinal phosphatase leads to loss of several IL-1-induced shifted IRAK bands, confirming that they are phosphorylated forms (11). IL-1-induced IRAK ubiquitination was confirmed by immunoprecipitation with anti-IRAK antibody followed by Western analysis with anti-ubiquitin antibody (39). To investigate the role of IRAK modification in IL-1 signaling, much effort has been devoted to map IRAK phosphorylation and ubiquitination sites. Because protein ubiquitination occurs on lysine residues, we mutated all three lysines in DD + UD + C1 (Fig. 2A, lysines at 32, 134, and 179) individually and in combinations. These mutants were then transfected into IRAK-deficient cells and tested for their modification and degradation in response to IL-1 stimulation. Although DD + UD + C1 was phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, and degraded (degradation is complete 6 h after stimulation (data not shown)), a point mutation changing lysine 134 to arginine completely abolished IL-1-induced IRAK ubiquitination and degradation (Fig. 2, B and C). Importantly, the K134R mutant was still phosphorylated upon IL-1 stimulation (Fig. 2D). We have shown previously that the kinase-inactive mutant of IRAK is still phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, and degraded upon IL-1 stimulation (11). We mutated lysine 134 to arginine in the kinase-inactive full-length IRAK in order to mimic DD + UD + C1 (which does not contain the kinase domain), eliminating modification initiated by IRAK autophosphorylation. The full-length ubiquitination mutant (IRAK1 KD ubmt) was modified upon IL-1 stimulation but with greatly reduced degradation as compared with the full-length IRAK (IRAK1 KD mt) (Fig. 2E). Treatment with calf intestinal phosphatase leads to loss of IL-1-induced shifted IRAK bands of the full-length ubiquitination mutant (IRAK1 KD ubmt), confirming that they are phosphorylated forms (Fig. 2F). These results suggest that the full-length ubiquitination mutant (IRAK1 KD ubmt) is probably still phosphorylated but deficient in ubiquitination in response to IL-1 stimulation, indicating that lysine 134 is an important site for IL-1-induced IRAK ubiquitination and subsequent degradation.
|
The Impact of IRAK Modification on IL-1-induced NF
B and JNK ActivationTo investigate the role of IRAK modification in IL-1 signaling, the above IRAK mutants defective in IRAK modification were examined for their ability to restore IL-1-induced NF
B and JNK activation in IRAK-deficient cells. For all of the following experiments, pools of IRAK-deficient cells stably transfected with IRAK modification mutants were used and the expression levels of the IRAK mutants were shown in Fig. 3A. Both ubiquitination (K134R) and phosphorylation ((S/T)A (131144)) mutants in the truncated form (DD + UD + C1) or the full-length IRAK fully restored IL-1-induced NF
B activation in IRAK-deficient cells, as measured by NF
B DNA binding activity (Fig. 3B), I
B
phosphorylation (Fig. 3C), and NF
B-dependent luciferase reporter assay (data not shown). However, IL-1-induced I
B
degradation was greatly reduced in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with these IRAK modification mutants (Fig. 3C), implicating a specific role of IRAK modification in the NF
B activation pathway. Because I
B
expression is induced upon IL-1 stimulation, we used the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide to inhibit the new synthesis of I
B
so that IL-1-induced I
B
degradation can be more easily detected. We confirmed the lack of IL-1-induced I
B
degradation in the presence of protein synthesis inhibition in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with the IRAK modification mutants (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, these IRAK mutants only partially restored IL-1-induced JNK activation in IRAK-deficient cells, indicating the importance of IRAK modification in IL-1 signaling (Fig. 3E).
IRAK Modification Mutants Failed to Activate TAK1We then carefully examined the impact of these IRAK mutants on IL-1-induced intermediate signaling leading to NF
B activation. Previous studies showed that IL-1-induced TAK1 activation plays a critical role in IL-1 signaling (15, 17, 29, 30). As shown in Fig. 4A, whereas modified IRAK forms a complex with TAK1 upon IL-1 stimulation in wild type 293 cells and IRAK-deficient cells transfected with the truncated IRAK (DD + UD + C1), IL-1-induced interaction between IRAK and TAK1 was abolished in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with IRAK phosphorylation and ubiquitination mutants, indicating that IRAK modification is required for the interaction of IRAK with TAK1. Previous studies showed that IL-1 stimulation leads to TAK1 phosphorylation and TAK1 activation in an IRAK-dependent manner (22). Because the IRAK mutants failed to interact with TAK1 upon IL-1 stimulation, we suspect that these mutants have also lost the ability to activate TAK1. As shown in Fig. 4, BD, the IRAK modification mutants indeed failed to activate the TAK1 in response to IL-1 stimulation, including TAK1 phosphorylation (Fig. 4B) and TAK1 kinase activity (Fig. 4D). IL-1-induced TAK1 phosphorylation was confirmed by treatment with calf intestinal phosphatase (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that IRAK modification is required for the interaction of IRAK with TAK1, thereby mediating the activation of TAK1.
IRAK Modification Mutants Formed Complex with TRAF6 and MEKK3Whereas IRAK modification mutants displayed defects in IL-1 signaling, including abolished TAK1 activation, reduced JNK activation, and IL-1-induced I
B
degradation, they are still capable of mediating IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation and NF
B activation, implicating that the IRAK mutants mediate an alternative NF
B activation pathway. Therefore, we carefully examined the interaction of IRAK mutants with other intermediate signaling components of the IL-1 pathway. TRAF6 is an immediate downstream component of IRAK in IL-1 signaling pathway (14, 15, 39). Although the IRAK mutants failed to interact with TAK1 upon IL-1 stimulation, they were still capable of forming a complex with TRAF6 (Fig. 4E), indicating that these specific IRAK modification mutations do not affect the ability of IRAK to interact with TRAF6. Although previous studies suggested that MEKK3 plays an important role in IL-1-induced NF
B activation (28), we recently observed that IL-1 stimulation leads to interaction of IRAK and TRAF6 with MEKK3 (Fig. 4, F and G). Interestingly, the IRAK modification mutants retained the ability to interact with MEKK3 (Fig. 4F) and were also able to mediate the interaction between TRAF6 and MEKK3 (Fig. 4G), implicating a specific role of MEKK3 in IL-1-induced IRAK-mediated signaling. Taken together, the above results suggest that the IRAK modification mutants may mediate the alternative NF
B activation pathway through their interaction with MEKK3 and TRAF6. It is important to note that although endogenous IRAK and TRAF6 formed a complex with both TAK1 (Fig. 4A) (15) and MEKK3 (Fig. 4, F and G), the interaction between endogenous TAK1 and MEKK3 was not detected upon IL-1 treatment (Fig. 4F), suggesting that IRAK-TRAF6-TAK1 and IRAK-TRAF6-MEKK3 are probably in two separate IL-1-induced complexes.
|
B Activation Is Mediated by Both TAK1 and MEKK3Although IRAK modification mutants are defective in several aspects of IL-1 signaling, including TAK1 activation, these mutants were still able to mediate IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation and NF
B activation, suggesting a TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway. Recently, TAK1-deficient mice were generated by gene targeting using the Cre-loxP system (29) and gene trapping strategy (30). Although TAK1-deficient MEFs have reduced IL-1-induced NF
B activation (29, 30), it is important to note that IL-1-induced NF
B activation is not completely abolished in TAK1-deficient cells (29, 30). In this study we used TAK1-deficient (Map3k7/) MEFs generated by in vitro transduction of Cre in MEFs homologous for loxP-flanked (floxed) Map3k7flox/flox, which were confirmed by genomic Southern, RT-PCR, and Western analysis (29). As shown in Fig. 5A, whereas IL-1-induced JNK activation was greatly reduced in TAK1-deficient MEFs as compared with that in control MEFs, IL-1-induced NF
B DNA binding activity was partially defective in TAK1-deficient MEFs. Interestingly, although IL-1-induced I
B
degradation was abolished in TAK1-deficient MEFs, IL-1 can lead to significant levels of I
B
phosphorylation in these cells. We used the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide to inhibit the new synthesis of I
B
to better assess IL-1-induced I
B
degradation. In the presence of cycloheximide, IL-1 stimulation clearly led to I
B
degradation in wild type MEFs, whereas IL-1-induced I
B degradation was still not detectable in TAK1-deficient cells (Fig. 5B). The phenotype of the TAK1-deficient MEFs for the IL-1-induced signaling echoes our results described above for the IRAK-deficient cells transfected with IRAK modification mutants, including abolished IL-1-induced TAK1 activation, reduced JNK activation, and IL-1-induced I
B degradation, retained IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation, and NF
B activation. Consistent with the phenotype of the TAK1-deficient MEFs, a TAK1 inhibitor (5Z-7-oxozeaenol (43)) that specifically inhibits TAK1 kinase activity abolished IL-1-induced JNK activation and I
B degradation and retained IL-1-induced I
B phosphorylation and NF
B activation in wild type 293 cells (Fig. 5C and data not shown). The fact that IL-1-induced NF
B activation was reduced and JNK activation impaired in both TAK1-deficient MEFs and 293 cells treated with the TAK1 inhibitor reflects the levels of IL-1-mediated signaling committed to the TAK1-dependent pathway in these cells. However, we noted that IRAK modification mutants were able to mediate similar levels of IL-1-induced NF
B activation as the wild type IRAK and partially restored the JNK activation without activating the TAK1-dependent pathway in IRAK-deficient cells derived from 293 parental cells (Fig. 3, B and E, and Fig. 4, BD). These results suggest that mutations in IRAK modification probably shift the commitment of all of the IRAK protein to the TAK1-independent pathway, which is able to compensate for the loss of the TAK1-dependent NF
B activation and partially for JNK activation.
The important question is as follows: what is this IRAK-mediated, TAK1-independent, IL-1-induced NF
B activation pathway? Although previous studies reported an important role of MEKK3 in IL-1-induced NF
B activation (28), we now observe that IL-1 stimulation leads to interaction of IRAK and TRAF6 with MEKK3 (Fig. 4, F and G). Importantly, the IRAK modification mutants did retain the ability to interact with MEKK3 (Fig. 4F) and were also able to mediate the interaction between TRAF6 and MEKK3 (Fig. 4G), implicating a specific role of MEKK3 in IL-1-induced IRAK-mediated signaling. Therefore, we examined the possibility for MEKK3 to be an important player in the TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway. We used the TAK1 inhibitor (5Z-7-oxozeaenol) to abolish the TAK1 activity in both wild type and MEKK3-deficient MEFs. In wild type MEFs, although the TAK1 inhibitor abolished IL-1-induced JNK activation, it had little effect on IL-1-induced I
B phosphorylation and partial inhibition on NF
B activation. However, this inhibitor completely impaired IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation and NF
B activation in addition to the abolishment of IL-1-induced JNK activation in the MEKK3-deficient MEFs (Fig. 5D). These results suggest that IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation is completely abolished only when both TAK1 and MEKK3 are impaired, suggesting that MEKK3 may play a critical role in the IL-1-induced TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway.
|
/
PhosphorylationBecause the above results suggest that IRAK modification plays an essential role in mediating the TAK1-dependent versus MEKK3-dependent NF
B activation pathway, it is important to examine the impact of IRAK modification on the IKK complex. Previous studies have shown that IL-1-induced TAK1 activation leads to IKK
/
phosphorylation (23). IL-1-induced IKK
/
phosphorylation was completely abolished in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with IRAK phosphorylation and ubiquitination mutants (Fig. 6A). These results suggest that IRAK modification is required for IL-1-induced IKK
/
phosphorylation, probably through its impact on TAK1 activation (23). Consistent with these findings, in TAK1/ MEFs, IL-1-induced IKK
/
phosphorylation was greatly reduced (Fig. 6B).
We next examined whether mutations in IRAK modification have any impact on IL-1-induced activation of the IKK kinase activity. As shown in Fig. 6C, although IL-1 stimulation leads to IKK activation in 293 cells, IL-1-induced IKK activation was abolished in IRAK-deficient cells. Importantly, the IRAK ubiquitination mutant (K134R) and phosphorylation mutant ((S/T)A (131144)) restored IL-1-induced IKK activation in cells to the similar level as DD + UD + C1 (the truncated IRAK with wild type phenotype) (Fig. 6C). Taken together, these results showed that although mutation in IRAK modification impaired TAK1 activation and IL-1-induced IKK
/
phosphorylation, the kinase activity of IKK was still activated in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with IRAK phosphorylation and ubiquitination mutants, confirming that IKK can be activated through a TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway.
Previous studies showed that IL-1 stimulation also leads to IKK
phosphorylation (44). Interestingly, the IRAK mutants that failed to mediated IL-1-induced TAK1 activation and IKK
/
phosphorylation can still lead to IL-1-induced IKK
phosphorylation (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, although the TAK1 inhibitor abolished IL-1-induced IKK
/
phosphorylation, it did not affect IL-1-induced IKK
phosphorylation (Fig. 6E). The correlation between IL-1-induced IKK
phosphorylation and TAK1-independent IKK activation suggests a potential role for IKK
in this alternative NF
B activation pathway.
IKK
Not IKK
Is Required for IL-1-induced TAK1-independent NF
B Activation PathwayWe then examined the relative contribution of IKK
versus IKK
in the TAK1-dependent and MEKK3-dependent NF
B activation pathways. Interestingly, as observed in TAK1-deficient MEFs (Fig. 5A), I
B
was phosphorylated, but not degraded, in IKK
/ MEFs in response to IL-1 stimulation (Fig. 7, A and B), implying that IKK
is required for the TAK1-dependent but not for the TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway. Importantly, although wild type IKK
restored IL-1-induced I
B degradation, the kinase-inactive mutant of IKK
did not, indicating that the kinase activity of IKK
is required for the IL-1-induced I
B
degradation (Fig. 7, A and B). The fact that IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation was completely abolished in IKK
/
/ MEFs (Fig. 7D) suggests that IKK
is probably responsible for the IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation observed in IKK
/ MEFs (Fig. 7, A and B). To test whether IKK
is indeed responsible for IL-1-induced I
B phosphorylation in TAK1-deficient MEFs (Fig. 5A), we used the TAK1 inhibitor to block IL-1-induced TAK1 activation and then examined the role of IKK
in TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway (Fig. 7C). Although the TAK1 inhibitor inhibited IL-1-induced JNK activation, it failed to inhibit IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation in wild type MEFs, which is probably because of the intact TAK1-independent pathway in these cells. Interestingly, the TAK1 inhibitor completely inhibited IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation in IKK
/ MEFs, indicating that IKK
is likely to be responsible for IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation in the TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway (Fig. 7C).
|
B Is Activated through I
B Phosphorylation and Dissociation without I
B Degradation in the TAK1-independent NF
B Activation PathwayThe dogma for NF
B activation is that signal-induced phosphorylation of I
B
targets this inhibitor of NF
B for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation, thus allowing NF
B to enter the nucleus to turn on the target gene (45). As presented above, our results showed that whereas IL-1 stimulation leads to I
B
phosphorylation and degradation in wild type cells, IL-1 treatment causes I
B
phosphorylation and NF
B activation but not I
B
degradation in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with IRAK modification mutants (Fig. 3, AD) and TAK1-deficient MEFs (Fig. 5, AC). One possibility is that the IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation mediated by the TAK1-independent pathway directly leads to dissociation of I
B
from NF
B without I
B
degradation. The dissociated NF
B then migrates to the nucleus to activate gene transcription. To test this hypothesis, we examined the NF
B-I
B complex in wild type and TAK1-deficient MEFs upon IL-1 stimulation. NF
B was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates of wild type and TAK1-deficient MEFs with and without IL-1 stimulation, followed by Western analysis with antibodies against I
B
and NF
B. As expected, IL-1 stimulation induced I
B
phosphorylation, I
B
degradation, and liberation of NF
B in wild type MEFs (Fig. 8A). Interestingly, in TAK1-deficient cells, whereas IL-1 led to I
B
phosphorylation but not I
B
degradation, I
B
was dissociated from NF
B upon IL-1 stimulation (Fig. 8A). Similarly, although IL-1 stimulation did not lead to I
B
degradation in IRAK-deficient cells transfected with IRAK modification mutants, I
B
was dissociated from NF
Bin these cells upon IL-1 stimulation (Fig. 8B). Taken together, these results indicate that NF
B can also be activated through I
B
phosphorylation and subsequent dissociation from NF
B without I
B
degradation.
The important questions for this unique mechanism of NF
B activation are how the phosphorylated I
B
mediated by the MEKK3-dependent pathway escapes the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation and how the phosphorylated I
B
dissociates from NF
B without degradation. Ubiquitination of I
B is carried out by a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme of the UBC4/5 family and SCF-
TrCP E3 ligase. IL-1 stimulation leads to I
B
phosphorylation on both Ser32 and Ser36.
TrCP E3 ligase binds specifically to the phosphorylated form of I
B (DS(PO3)GLDS(PO3)) and brings it the SCF complex for polyubiquitination, which is then selectively degraded by the 26 S proteasome. Interestingly, we found that the phosphorylated I
B
in I1A cells transfected with IRAK modification mutants failed to bind to
-TrcP, suggesting that I
B
might be phosphorylated differently by the TAK1-independent pathway (Fig. 8C). To address this issue, we performed IKK kinase assay in wild type and TAK1-deficient MEFs using wild type I
B
and I
B
mutants (S32A, S36A, and S32A/S36A) as substrates (Fig. 8D). Interestingly, although the IKK complex from both the wild type and TAK1-deficient MEFs can phosphorylate wild type and S32A mutant I
B
, S36A mutant I
B
can only be phosphorylated by the IKK complex precipitated from wild type but not TAK1-deficient MEFs. As expected, S32A/S36A cannot be phosphorylated by IKK from either wild type or TAK1-deficient MEFs. Taken together, the above results suggest that Ser36 is probably the major phosphorylation site for the IKK complex in the absence of TAK1.
|
B Activation Pathway in Primary Intestinal Epithelial CellsThrough the manipulation of the IRAK molecule, we observed two distinct IL-1-induced NF
B activation pathways (Fig. 1). The TAK1-dependent pathway leads to IKK
/
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, resulting in classical NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation and degradation. Our results suggest the presence of a TAK1-independent MEKK3-dependent pathway that involves IKK
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, resulting in NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation but without I
B degradation. Interestingly, this alternative NF
B activation pathway was observed in primary epithelial cells. As shown in Fig. 9, A and B, IL-1 and LPS stimulation leads to I
B
phosphorylation and degradation in bone marrow-derived macrophages, whereas the same stimuli could only lead to I
B
phosphorylation but not degradation in primary epithelial cells. These results suggest that the regulation of these two NF
B activation pathways may modulate important physiological functions, because the two pathways were preferentially utilized by different primary cells. Although it is unclear how these two pathways are regulated in vivo, we did observe differential usage of the two pathways when cells were stimulated with different concentrations of IL-1. When 293 cells were stimulated with a low concentration of IL-1 (0.1 ng/ml), I
B
was phosphorylated but with reduced degradation as compared with the cells stimulated with a high concentration of IL-1 (10 ng/ml), implicating regulation of the two pathways at the receptor complex (Fig. 9C). | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation (Fig. 1). These two pathways are regulated at the level of IRAK modification. The TAK1-dependent pathway causes IKK
/
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, leading to classical NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation and degradation. The TAK1-independent MEKK3-dependent pathway induces IKK
phosphorylation and IKK
activation, resulting in NF
B activation through I
B
phosphorylation and subsequent dissociation from NF
B but without I
B
degradation. It is important to note that we recently found that TLR8-mediated NF
B and JNK activation are TAK1-independent and MEKK3-dependent (46), suggesting a regulatory mechanism at the level of receptor complexes that determines the usage of TAK1-dependent versus MEKK3-dependent pathways in IL-1R/TLR signaling. Upon IL-1 stimulation, IRAK becomes heavily phosphorylated. Several phosphorylation sites have been identified in the kinase domain of IRAK, including Thr209 and Thr387 (36). Both of these phosphorylation sites are critical for the kinase activity of IRAK. Although Thr209 phosphorylation regulates the opening of IRAK kinase domain, Thr387 phosphorylation regulates full enzymatic activity of IRAK. In this study, we focused on the UD domain (undetermined domain, amino acids 103198), also referred to as Pro-ST region (rich in proline, serine, and threonine). The UD domain (Pro-ST region) is the site of IRAK hyperphosphorylation (36, 37). We identified a cluster of six serines and threonines (Ser131, Ser137, Ser138, Ser140, Thr141, and Ser144) in this UD domain. Mutation of these serines and threonines ((S/T)A (131144)) severely impaired IL-1-induced IRAK phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and degradation. Previous studies showed that IRAK phosphorylation is required for IRAK ubiquitination (42). The phosphorylation of these sites ((S/T) (131144)) is probably required for IL-1-induced ubiquitination, because we identified the adjacent lysine 134 as a critical ubiquitination site. Point mutation of lysine 134 to arginine indeed abolished IL-1-induced IRAK ubiquitination. Point mutation of serine 138 to alanine in the truncated form IRAK showed a partial defect in IL-1-induced IRAK phosphorylation.3 Future effort is required to mutate these serines and threonines ((S/T) (131144)) individually or in combination to identify the specific site required for mediating IRAK ubiquitination. Because the IRAK phosphorylation mutants were all created in the kinase-inactive IRAK molecule, these sites are probably phosphorylated by IRAK4. Our previous studies showed that the kinase activity of IRAK and IRAK4 might be redundant in the IL-1 pathway, suggesting that serines and threonines ((S/T) (131144)) might also be autophosphorylated by IRAK (12). Nevertheless, it is also possible that different sites are autophosphorylated in the UD domain.
The fact that the IRAK ubiquitination mutants are only defective in IL-1-induced IRAK ubiquitination but not IRAK phosphorylation suggests that it is the lack of ubiquitination not phosphorylation responsible for the abolished IL-1-induced signaling events. The defect in IL-1 signaling observed with the IRAK phosphorylation mutants ((S/T)A (131144), IRAK1KD pmt) is likely due to the lack of ubiquitination of these mutants, because that IRAK phosphorylation is required for its ubiquitination. The fact that the IRAK ubiquitination mutants retained their interaction with TRAF6, but failed to interact with TAK1 and activate TAK1, suggests that IRAK ubiquitination is necessary for the recruitment of TAK1 to the IRAK-TRAF6 complex, and the formation of IRAK-TRAF6-TAK1 complex is necessary for the activation of TAK1. Polyubiquitination of a target protein with the ubiquitin linked through Lys48 is recognized by proteasome and ultimately degraded. However, polyubiquitination chains linked through Lys63 of ubiquitin do not target the substrate for proteasome-mediated degradation, mediating protein-protein interaction and cell signaling instead. It has been reported that TRAF6-mediated Lys63 polyubiquitination plays an essential role in the activation of TAK1, IKK, and NF
B. However, TRAF6 is probably not the E3 for IRAK ubiquitination, because IRAK is still ubiquitinated and degraded in TRAF6-deficient MEFs.3 We have found that polyubiquitination chains on IRAK are linked through both Lys48 and Lys63.3 We and others recently found that Pellinos proteins can ubiquitinate IRAK, although the precise function of Pellinos in IL-1 signaling is still unclear (47).3 Because Pellinos do not lead to the degradation of IRAK, they are unlikely the ubiquitin protein ligase E3s responsible for the specific IRAK ubiquitination that leads to IRAK degradation (47).3 At the moment, it is unknown which ubiquitin protein ligase E3(s) is responsible for the IL-1-induced ubiquitination of IRAK required for the activation of the TAK1-dependent NF
B activation pathway. Although our results suggest that IL-1-induced ubiquitination and degradation of IRAK are required for the TAK1-dependent NF
B activation pathway, it is also possible that only the IL-1-induced IRAK ubiquitination is the necessary biochemical modification required for the activation of the TAK1-dependent pathway, and the IL-1-induced IRAK degradation is the consequence of activation. On the other hand, we found that the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 blocked IL-1-induced TAK1 activation, suggesting that IL-1-induced IRAK degradation might be a necessary step in the activation of the TAK1-dependent pathway.3 One possible role for IL-1-induced IRAK degradation in the activation of TAK1 is to release the TAK1 complex from the membrane-associated IRAK-TRAF6-TAK1-TAB2/3 complex, because we have previously shown that modified IRAK is always associated with the membrane, and only the TAK1 complex is released to the cytosol (15).
Another important finding of this study is the identification of the IL-1-induced TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway. Although the IRAK modification mutants are defective in the TAK1-mediated NF
B activation pathway, these IRAK mutants are still capable of mediating IL-1-induced I
B
phosphorylation and NF
B activation but not I
B
degradation, implicating a TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway. Consistent with this conclusion, in TAK1/ MEFs, IL-1 stimulation could lead to I
B
phosphorylation and a significant level of NF
B activation without IL-1-induced IKK
/
phosphorylation and a lack of I
B
degradation, confirming a TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway. Importantly, we found that the IRAK modification mutants retained the interaction not only with TRAF6 but also with MEKK3, implicating TRAF6 and MEKK3 in the TAK1-independent NF
B activation pathway. Whereas Blonska et al. (48) recently reported that TAK1-MEKK3 forms a complex to mediate tumor necrosis factor-
-induced NF
B activation, direct interaction between endogenous TAK1 and MEKK3 was not detected upon IL-1 stimulation. Although endogenous IRAK and TRAF6 interact with both endogenous TAK1 and MEKK3 in 293 cells in response to IL-1 stimulation, we did not detect any interaction between TAK1 and MEKK3. Our results suggest that IRAK-TRAF6-TAK1 and IRAK-TRAF6-MEKK3 are two independent IL-1-induced complexes. In support of this, we found that the impairment of both TAK1 and MEKK3 completely abolished IL-1-induced NF
B activation, by using a TAK1 inhibitor in MEKK3-deficient cells and knockdown of MEKK3 in TAK1-deficient cells with MEKK3 small interfering RNA. The fact that IL-1-induced NF
B activation is completely abolished in TRAF6-deficient cells indicates that TRAF6 is probably required for both TAK1-dependent and MEKK3-dependent NF
B activation pathways. Taken together, our results imply that IL-1 mediates TAK1-dependent and MEKK3-dependent NF
B activation pathways, which bifurcate at the level of IRAK modification.
|
|
/
plays a critical role in IKK activation, especially in the activation of IKK
(49). In TAK1-deficient MEFs, IL-1-induced IKK
/
phosphorylation is impaired, suggesting that IKK
/
phosphorylation plays an important role in TAK1-mediated IKK activation. Interestingly, although IL-1 treatment does not lead to IKK
/
phosphorylation in TAK1-deficient MEFs, IL-1 still activates the kinase activity of IKK in these cells. These results suggest that IKK can be activated in the absence of TAK1 through a differen