Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M708836200 on February 5, 2008

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 15, 9933-9944, April 11, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/15/9933    most recent
M708836200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsu, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsu, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Characterization of the Histidine-containing Phosphotransfer Protein B-mediated Multistep Phosphorelay System in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1*Formula

Jye-Lin Hsu{ddagger}, Hsuan-Cheng Chen{ddagger}, Hwei-Ling Peng§, and Hwan-You Chang{ddagger}1

From the {ddagger}Institute of Molecular Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Guang Fu Rd. 2nd Sec., Hsin Chu 300 and the §Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, 75 Po Ai Street, Hsin Chu, Taiwan, Republic of China

Received for publication, October 26, 2007 , and in revised form, February 4, 2008.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Certain bacterial two-component sensor kinases possess a histidine-containing phosphotransfer (Hpt) domain to carry out a multistep phosphotransferring reaction to a cognate response regulator. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 contains three genes that encode proteins with an Hpt domain but lack a kinase domain. To identify the sensor kinase coupled to these Hpt proteins, a phosphorelay profiling assay was performed. Among the 12 recombinant orphan sensor kinases tested, 4 of these sensors (PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, and RetS) transferred the phosphoryl group to HptB (PA3345). The in vivo interaction between HptB and each of the sensors was also confirmed using the bacterial two-hybrid assay. Interestingly, the phosphoryl groups from these sensors all appeared to be transferred via HptB to PA3346, a novel phosphatase consisting of an N-terminal receiver domain and a eukaryotic type Ser/Thr phosphatase domain, and resulted in a significant increase of its phosphatase activity. The subsequent reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed an operon structure of hptB-PA3346–PA3347, suggesting a coordinate expression of the three genes to carry out a signal transduction. The possibility was supported by the analysis showing PA3347 is able to be phosphorylated on Ser-56, and this phosphoryl group could be removed by PA3346 protein. Finally, analysis of PA3346 and PA3347 gene knock-out mutants revealed that these genes are associated with bacterial swarming activity and biofilm formation. Together, these results disclose a novel multistep phosphorelay system that is essential for P. aeruginosa to respond to a wide spectrum of environmental signals.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Most bacteria possess multiple sets of two-component regulatory systems (2CSs),2 which are used for the reception of and response to environmental challenges (1). Typical 2CSs are composed of a sensor and a response regulator. The sensor is normally a transmembrane histidine kinase that detects a specific environmental stimulus and auto-phosphorylates a conserved histidine residue within its transmitter domain. The phosphoryl group is subsequently transferred from the histidine residue to an aspartic acid on the cognate regulator, which then activates the expression of genes required for countering the environmental stress. In addition to this basic "His -> Asp" type of phosphotransfer mechanism, more complex multistep phosphorelay 2CSs also exist, in which the sensor harbors two extra domains as follows: a receiver domain containing a phosphor-accepting Asp and a Hpt domain. The most well characterized examples of the complex type 2CS are the anaerobic regulator ArcAB of Escherichia coli (2) and virulence-associated regulator BvgAS of Bordetella spp. (3). Both are capable of performing a multistep His -> Asp -> His -> Asp phosphorelay.

An intermediate group of sensors are known as the hybrid sensors. The hybrid-type sensors, which contain a kinase and a receiver domain but lack an Hpt domain, are believed to require another protein to provide the Hpt domain for their signal transduction (Fig. 1) (4, 5). An example of such a system has been demonstrated in E. coli, in which the hybrid sensor RcsC is dependent on YojN, an Hpt domain-containing protein, to signal and activate the response regulator RcsB (5, 6). Another example was found recently in yeast, in which YPD1, also an Hpt module protein, could transfer phosphoryl groups from sensor kinase SLN1 to two downstream response regulatory proteins, SSK1 and SKN7 (7–9). These findings suggest that Hpt module-containing proteins function as intermediate transducers in multistep phosphorelay reactions (5, 10, 11).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative pathogen causing many acute and chronic infections, particularly in hospitalized individuals. The bacterium is responsible for the majority of morbidity and mortality in patients afflicted with cystic fibrosis (11, 12). The bacterium is also ubiquitous in the environment and is well known for its multidrug resistance. The strong capability of the bacterium to adapt to different environments might be partly explained by the presence of more than 60 sets of 2CSs (13, 14). A total of 12 hybrid-type kinases and 3 putative Hpt-module proteins have been annotated among the large number of 2CS proteins (Fig. 1). It is not clear, however, whether these hybrid sensors can indeed transmit the phosphoryl signal to the Hpt proteins. Furthermore, unlike the operon organization of most of the 2CS genes, the majority of the hybrid sensor genes does not link to a response regulator-encoding gene. Additionally, eight "orphan" response regulator genes, which do not link to any sensor gene, were also found in the P. aeruginosa genome (Fig. 1) (13–15). These orphan response regulators are therefore good candidates for receiving signals from the Hpt proteins.

We have demonstrated in a previous report that 1 of the 12 hybrid sensors, encoded by PA1611, is capable of transferring a phosphoryl group to 1 of the 3 Hpt proteins (16). We here extend the study to identify the multistep phosphorelay pathways among these sensor kinases, Hpt proteins, and orphan response regulators by performing in vitro phosphotransfer reactions systematically. In addition, we further evaluated the functional roles of the signaling pathway mediated by HptB. Our results reveal how these 2CS members are organized into complex signaling regulatory pathways, allowing P. aeruginosa to respond to a variety of different environmental signals flexibly and efficiently.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions—The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. All P. aeruginosa mutants used in this study were derived from wild type strain PAO1. Both E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains were propagated in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on LB agar at 37 °C. The concentrations of antibiotics used for selection of recombinant E. coli were 100 µg/ml ampicillin, 25 µg/ml kanamycin, and/or 5 µg/ml tetracycline, whereas 400 µg/ml carbenicillin and/or 50 µg/ml tetracycline were used for the selection of P. aeruginosa derivatives.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

 
RT-PCR—Total RNA was extracted from mid-log phase P. aeruginosa PAO1 using the TRI reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Contaminating DNA was eliminated from the RNA samples with RNase-free DNase (Promega). cDNA was reverse-transcribed from RNA using the SuperScript first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's recommendations. PCR was carried out at 95 °C for 1 min, 64 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min per cycle for 30 cycles, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min, and the reaction products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel. The primers used in this study are listed in the supplemental Table S1.

Cloning, Expression, and Purification of His-tagged Proteins—The recombinant DNA manipulations were carried out essentially as described (17). All restriction endonucleases and DNA-modifying enzymes were obtained from New England Biolabs and were used at the conditions suggested by the supplier. To generate recombinant proteins containing an N-terminal His6 tag, the coding region for each of the desired proteins was first amplified by PCR, cloned into an expression vector (pET30a or pET100), and transformed into E. coli Novablue (DE3). The transformants were induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside, collected by centrifugation, resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 500 mM NaCl), and disrupted on ice by ultrasonication. After centrifugation at 24,000 x g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove debris, the clarified cell lysate was loaded onto a nickel-charged column (Amersham Biosciences) and washed, and the His6-tagged proteins were then eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The compositions of wash and elution buffers, as well as the chromatography procedure, were essentially as described by the manufacturer (Amersham Biosciences). The purified proteins were dialyzed against storage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 200 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50% glycerol), and their concentrations were determined by the Bradford method using a Bio-Rad kit.

In Vitro Phosphorelay Assays—The signal transduction between the sensors and the Hpt proteins and between the Hpt proteins and the orphan regulators was tested by in vitro phosphorelay assays. The composition of the phosphorelay reaction was as described previously (16) and contained 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 µCi of [{gamma}-32P]ATP at a final concentration of 2.5 µM. For autophosphorylation of the sensor, 1 µM of recombinant sensor protein was used, and the reaction was performed at 25 °C for 30 min. Phosphorelay from sensors to different Hpt proteins was performed by adding 1 µM of purified HptA, HptB, or HptC protein to the autokinase reaction mixture. The phosphorylation of response regulators was performed by incubating the purified regulator protein of interest (1 µM) in the reaction buffer with sensor kinase PA2824 and HptB at 25 °C for 30 min to allow for autophosphorylation of the sensor protein, and later at 37 °C for 30 min to allow for phosphorelay to HptB, and then finally to the regulator. In the reverse phosphorelay assay, a 32P-phosphorylated HptB was first prepared by using PA1611 sensor kinase as stated above. The sensor protein with no detectable autokinase activity was then added individually to the mixtures with excess ATP (0.5 mM) and incubated at 25 °C for 15 min. All the phosphorelay reactions were terminated by adding an equal volume of SDS-PAGE loading buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromphenol blue, 10% glycerol) and resolved by 15% SDS-PAGE, and the phosphorylation pattern was visualized by autoradiography. All phosphorelay assays were performed independently at least three times.

Bacterial Two-hybrid Assay—DNA fragments encoding C-terminal cytoplasmic regions of hybrid sensors (PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, and RetS) and full-length HptB were cloned, respectively, at the 3' end of genes encoding {lambda}-CI repressor protein domain carried on pTRG vector and {alpha}-subunit RNA polymerase ({alpha}-RNAP) domain on pBT vector as described by the manufacturer (Stratagene). The resulting gene fusion constructs, pTRG-1611, pTRG-1976, pTRG-2824, pTRG-RetS, and pBT-HptB, were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The positive controls used were pTRG-GAL11P and pBT-LGF2 (Stratagene). Derivatives of pTRG and pBT were co-transformed into E. coli XL1-Blue MRF' Kan cells and selected on LB plates supplemented with 250 µg/ml carbenicillin, 25 µg/ml chloramphenicol, and 50 µg/ml kanamycin. Then single colonies were patched on X-gal indicator plates (LB-agar plates supplemented with 350 µg/ml carbenicillin, 25 µg/ml chloramphenicol, 15 µg/ml tetracycline, 50 µg/ml kanamycin, 50 µg/ml X-gal, 0.2 mM phenylethyl β-D-thiogalactoside, and 20 µM isopropyl 1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside) for 17–24 h at 37 °C.

Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation of PA3347 Protein in Vitro—The open reading frame of PA3347 was cloned into the expression vector pGEX-5X-1 and overexpressed as an N-terminal glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein. The recombinant PA3347 protein was purified through a Glutathione-Superflow column under the conditions recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham Biosciences). The purified fusion protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subsequently subjected to the phosphorylation assay. The P. aeruginosa cell lysate used for phosphorylation of the GST-PA3347 protein was prepared from exponentially grown bacteria by ultrasonication on ice followed by centrifugation at 24,000 x g for 20 min at 4 °C. Approximately 2.4 µM purified GST-PA3347 fusion protein was incubated with 10 mg of prepared lysate and 0.15 µCi of [{gamma}-32P]ATP at 25 °C for 1 h, precipitated with Glutathione-Superflow beads, and subsequently analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Protein phosphatase activity of PA3346 was determined by incubation of the purified PA3346 protein with phosphorylated PA3347 at 37 °C for 30 min. When indicated, 10 units of calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs) or 50 mM EDTA was included in the reaction as a control. All reactions were terminated by adding an equal volume of SDS-PAGE loading buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.

Construction of GST-PA3347 Site-specific Mutations—Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the Stratagene QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit. Oligonucleotide primer sequences are provided in the supplemental material.


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.
Schematic diagram showing the phosphorelay in 2CSs with a hybrid type sensor. The P. aeruginosa gene index number of the orphan sensors, Hpt proteins, and response regulators investigated in this study are listed below the diagram. The underlines indicate the only previously known coupled sensor kinase and response regulator genes.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.
Transduction of phosphoryl signals from orphan sensors to Hpt proteins. Sensor proteins were individually incubated with [{gamma}-32P]ATP either in the absence (-) or presence (+) of an Hpt protein, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and Coomassie Blue staining (right figure). The phosphorylation profiles of sensors and target Hpt protein were detected by autoradiography (right figure). The sensor kinases used were PA1611 (A), PA1976 (B), PA2824 (C), PA2177 (D), and PA2583 (E). The protein bands of the expected size for the sensor kinase tested and HptB protein are indicated by arrowheads.

 
In Vitro Phosphatase Activity Assays of PA3346—To detect phosphatase activity of phosphorylated PA3346, 5 µg of PA3346 purified from E. coli was preincubated with 1 µg of sensor (PA2824) and 1 µg of HptB in 50 µl of buffer containing 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 2.5 µM ATP for 10 min at 25 °C and then 5 min at 37 °C. The fluorogenic compound 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DIFMUP) and its dephosphorylated standard 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl were purchased from Molecular Probes. For kinetic analysis, the DIFMUP stock solution was prediluted in reaction buffer and added to the reaction mixture to initiate the reaction at 25 °C. Fluorescent excitation of hydrolyzed DIFMUP and the standard DIFMU were measured at 355 nm, and emission was detected at 460 nm in a fluorescence plate reader (VITOR3, PerkinElmer Life Sciences).

Construction of Isogenic Mutants—The allelic exchange strategy was used to generate gene-specific mutants in P. aeruginosa. DNA fragments ~1 kb in size flanking both sides of PA3346 and PA3347 were PCR-amplified by specific primer pairs (supplemental Table S1) and cloned into the suicide vector pEX18Tc. The generated plasmids were mobilized from E. coli SM10 into P. aeruginosa PAO1 through conjugation. The tetracycline-resistant transconjugants were selected positively with 5% sucrose for loss of the vector. PA3346 and PA3347 deletion mutants were verified by PCR and Southern blotting analysis (supplemental Fig. S1). Complementation of the gene defects was performed by cloning DNA fragments comprising either the PA3346 or the PA3347 open reading frame with an N-terminal His tag sequence into the shuttle vector pMMB66 to result in pMMB46 and pMMB47, which were then mobilized into the mutant bacteria by conjugation.


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3.
Reverse phosphorylation of sensor proteins with phosphorylated HptB. The sensor kinase PA1611 was incubated with HptB and with a sensor protein unable to perform autophosphorylation. The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to autoradiography (A) and Coomassie Blue staining (B). The phosphorylated sensors and HptB are marked by filled arrowheads, whereas the position of phosphorylated RetS is indicated by empty arrowheads.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 4.
Bacterial two-hybrid analyses of interactions between hybrid sensors and HptB. E. coli XL1-Blue cells carrying various combinations of pTRG and pBT-derived plasmids of the two-hybrid systems were propagated on indicator plates. The plasmids harbored by the testing bacterial strains are indicated below the plates. T+, pTRG-GAL11p and pBT-LGF2 (positive control); T-, pTRG and pBT vectors (negative control).

 
Bacteria Motility Assays—The plates for the swarming assay contained M8 medium base supplemented with 0.5% Bacto-Agar, 0.02% glucose, and 0.5% casamino acids (18). The bacterial strains to be tested were transferred from an overnight culture plate using a sterile toothpick and incubation was done at 37 °C for the swarming assay. The assays were performed independently at least three times.

Biofilm Formation Assay—Biofilm formation was assayed in 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates. Bacterial strains to be tested were grown overnight at 37 °C in LB broth and diluted 1:50 in fresh media into the 96-well plates the next morning. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for different times without shaking. The extent of biofilm formation was determined by staining with 1% crystal violet as described previously (16) and expressed as the absorbance at 595 nm.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cloning, Expression, and Purification of P. aeruginosa Hybrid Sensors—As the first step toward elucidating the signaling pathways exerted by the 12 hybrid-type sensors, we cloned all the genes encoding these sensors (listed in Fig. 1), overexpressed them with a terminal His6 fusion in E. coli, and purified the gene products. To eliminate potential insolubility problems, the N-terminal transmembrane domains of the sensors were removed. The remaining C-terminal cytoplasmic regions containing the His-containing transmitter and the Asp-containing receiver domain are predicted to possess auto-phosphorylation activity, as well as the ability to transfer the phosphoryl group to the corresponding response regulators (19). All the sensor proteins, with the exception of PA1992, which did not yield sufficient quantities for subsequent study, could be purified to apparent homogeneity in soluble form by a single step affinity chromatography (data not shown).

Sensor Proteins PA1611, PA1976, and PA2824 Phosphorylate HptB—To identify the relationships between the three Hpt proteins and the hybrid-type sensor histidine kinases, the phosphotransfer profiling assay (20) was employed. In the assay, the purified sensor proteins were incubated with [{gamma}-32P]ATP to assess their autophosphorylation activity, and five of the tested sensors (PA1611, PA1976, PA2177, PA2583, and PA2824) showed varying degrees of autophosphorylation (Fig. 2, A–E, 1st lane). The phosphorylated sensor proteins were incubated with an Hpt protein, and the transfer of the phosphoryl group was examined by autoradiography (Fig. 2, A–E). The results showed that sensors PA1611, PA1976, and PA2824 could transfer a phosphoryl group specifically to HptB but not to either HptA or HptC (Fig. 2, A–C). Both sensors PA2177 and PA2583 were unable to phosphorylate any of the Hpt proteins in vitro despite their relatively high auto-kinase activity (Fig. 2, D and E). Sensors were purified and tested in three independent assays.

RetS (PA4856) Also Interacts with HptB—To investigate whether any of the sensor proteins incapable of autophosphorylation could interact with HptB, a reverse phosphorylation experiment was performed as described (21, 22). Phosphorylated HptB, prepared with [{gamma}-32P]ATP and sensor PA1611, was used in this study as the phosphoryl group donor. In five independent assays, the appearance of a phosphorylated RetS band accompanied with a significant reduction of isotope signal of HptB (Fig. 3) could be detected indicating that, besides PA1611, PA1976, and PA2824, RetS is another sensor that participates in HptB-mediated phosphorelay.


Figure 5
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 5.
Identification of orphan response regulators targeted by HptB. A, reconstitution of PA2824-HptB-PA3346 phosphorelay in vitro. The reactions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subjected to autoradiography. The plus and minus signs indicate the presence or absence of PA2824, HptB, and PA3346 in the in vitro phosphorelay assay. B, capability of orphan response regulators for receiving phosphoryl signals from HptB. Phosphorylated HptB was used as the phosphoryl group donor in the in vitro phosphorelay assay, and the proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to autoradiography. The P. aeruginosa gene name or index numbers are indicated for each orphan response regulator. The sensor protein used to initiate phosphorelay was PA2824.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 6.
PA3347, PA3346, and hptB are organized as an operon. A, gene map of the hptB gene cluster. The thick arrows denote open reading frames. Lines between closed circles below the arrows indicate the intergenic regions amplified by PCR with the indicated primer pairs. B, RT-PCR analysis of the intergenic regions in the hptB gene cluster. PCR products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. The amplified products from primer sets H1, H2, and H3 are shown in lanes 1–3 (695 bp), lanes 4–6 (146 bp), and lanes 7–9 (344 bp), respectively. Lanes 1, 4, and 7 represent the PCR products from genomic DNA template as positive controls. Lanes 2, 5, and 8 represent the PCR products using cellular RNA without reverse transcription as negative controls. Lanes 3, 6, and 9 show the PCR products amplified from randomly primed cDNA of P. aeruginosa. The sizes of the DNA markers are indicated at left. The arrowheads indicate the PCR products of the predicted size.

 
PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, and RetS Interact with HptB in Vivo—To further verify whether the interaction between these sensors, PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, RetS, and HptB indeed occurs in vivo, a bacterial two-hybrid assay was performed. The cytoplasmic domain of the sensors was constructed onto the target vector pTRG to produce a recombinant protein fused to the {lambda}-CI domain. The full-length HptB was cloned at the 3' end of the gene encoding the {alpha}-RNAP domain on the bait vector pBT to produce an {alpha}-RNAP-HptB fusion protein. Interaction between the sensor and HptB fusion proteins would allow the {lambda}-CI to bind to the operator region and recruit {alpha}-RNAP to initiate transcription of the ampR and lacZ reporter genes. Fig. 4 shows the result of such an analysis, where the strains carrying both plasmids were grown on X-gal indicator plates supplemented with carbenicillin. All tested hybrid sensors (PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, and RetS) were able to interact with HptB as reflected by the significant growth of the bacterial strains. No interaction was detected either between the sensor fusion proteins and {lambda}-CI without fused HptB or between HptB fusion and {alpha}-RNAP. Together, these results strongly suggest that sensors PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, and RetS interact with HptB via their cytoplasmic domains and are able to transfer the phosphoryl group to HptB.

PA3346 Is the Only Orphan Response Regulator Trans-phosphorylated by HptB—We have previously shown that HptB (PA3345) could relay the phosphoryl signal to a response regulator (PA3346) (16). In addition to PA3346, there are seven response regulator-encoding genes in the P. aeruginosa PAO1 genome that do not physically link to a sensor gene and are considered "orphans" (Fig. 1). Although the response regulator PA1397 has not been classified as an orphan, it was of particular interest to this study because it resides next to the gene encoding hybrid sensor PA1396 and may be a target of HptB. To explore whether any of these response regulators could serve as a downstream target of HptB, these response regulators were first synthesized in E. coli using standard recombinant DNA techniques and used in the phosphorelay assay. With the only exception of PA4781, the other seven response regulators (PA0034, PA2798, PA3604, PA3714, PA4843, PA5364, and PA1397) could be successfully overexpressed and purified to homogeneity in soluble form using nickel chelate affinity chromatography (supplemental Fig. S2). The phosphorylation pattern of the seven response regulators was then determined in three independent assays by co-incubation with PA2824 sensor kinase and HptB. As shown in Fig. 5A, PA3346 could efficiently receive the phosphoryl signal relayed from PA2824 to HptB. All other tested response regulators were unable to receive the phosphoryl group from HptB (Fig. 5B).

PA3347, PA3346, and hptB Are Organized as an Operon—Bioinformatic analysis of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 genome has revealed that hptB (PA3345), PA3346, and PA3347 are closely clustered together with an intergenic distance of 66 and 1 bp, respectively. In addition, all three genes are transcribed in the same direction starting at PA3347 and proceeding through hptB, suggesting that they are organized as an operon and responsible for the same functional task. To determine whether these genes are indeed transcribed in the same unit, an RT-PCR experiment was performed. PCR products of 146 and 344 bp in length, comprising the intergenic region of hptB-PA3346 and of PA3346–PA3347, respectively, can be clearly observed in Fig. 6. The same primer sets were unable to generate any PCR product with the same RNA template without reverse transcription. Similarly, no RT-PCR product was found when the primer pair designed to amplify the intergenic region between PA3347 and PA3348 was used. Our results thus confirmed that PA3347, PA3346, and hptB, but not PA3348, are indeed organized as an operon.


Figure 7
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 7.
Multiple sequence alignment of P. aeruginosa PA3346 and PA3347. A, sequence of the PA3346 phosphatase domain compared with other PP2C proteins in B. subtilis using RPSBLAST. PP2C domains are denoted by black boxes. Two conserved phosphatase motifs are denoted by Box 1 and Box 2. B, sequence alignment of P. aeruginosa PA3347 with various anti-{sigma} antagonists of B. subtilis. Conserved residues are shaded in black and identical residues are shaded in gray. The conserved Ser-56 residue subject to phosphorylation regulation is marked by an asterisk. The GenBankTM accession numbers for each of the protein sequences are as follows: SpoIIE, U26835 [GenBank] ; RsbU, L35574 [GenBank] ; RsbX, M34995 [GenBank] ; SpoAA, AAA22789 [GenBank] .1; RsbV, L35574 [GenBank] ; RsbS, L35574 [GenBank] .

 
PA3347 Is Phosphorylated Both in Vivo and in Vitro—The response regulator PA3346 encodes a protein of 571 amino acids with two notable features: an N-terminal phosphoryl signal receiver domain and a protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C)-like domain. The PP2C domain shares 21% sequence similarity with the phosphatase domain of RsbU in Bacillus subtilis (Fig. 7A) (23). PA3346 has two conserved amino acid clusters, which are thought to be required for the function of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic PP2C members, such as RsbU, SpoIIE, and RsbX in B. subtilis and TPD1 and PTC1 in yeast (24) (Fig. 7A). RsbU is an important stress regulator and is known to exert its function through modulation of the phosphorylation of RsbV, a {sigma} factor antagonist (23, 25). Interestingly, PA3347 also contains a {sigma} factor antagonist domain (Fig. 7B). The alignment of the amino acid sequences of PA3347 and other {sigma} factor antagonists, RsbV, RsbS, and SpoIIAA, has revealed an overall 16% sequence identity among these proteins. A serine residue known to be essential for the regulation of RsbV and SpoIIA activity (26, 27) was also found to be conserved in PA3347 at amino acid position 56 (Fig. 7B). In analogy to the relationship between SpoIIAA and SpoIIAB and between RsbU and RsbV, we predict that PA3346 may regulate PA3347 through dephosphorylation.

To investigate whether PA3347 is indeed phosphorylated in vivo, recombinant His6-PA3347 was synthesized in P. aeruginosa PAO1 and purified by using a nickel-charged column. The eluted sample was further resolved by SDS-PAGE, and the protein band was excised and subjected to proteolytic digestion with trypsin, followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy analysis. Analysis of the mass spectrometry spectrum revealed two major peaks of 1850.994 and 1930.963 Da in mass, which are consistent with those predicted for the unphosphorylated and phosphorylated Ser-56-containing peptides (NATYLDSSALGMLLLLR), 1849.997 and 1929.963 Da, respectively (Fig. 8A). The phosphorylated Ser-56-containing peptide peak, however, was not observed in PA3347 synthesized in E. coli (supplemental Fig. S3).


Figure 8
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 8.
PA3347 is subject to phosphorylation and can be dephosphorylated by PA3346. A, MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of tryptic fragments of PA3347 purified from P. aeruginosa. SP denotes the Ser-56-containing peptide, NATYLDSSALGMLLLLR. Modifications of the peptide are shown as M, oxidation; Y, phosphorylation. The observed m/z values and the peak assignments are also indicated. Calculated monoisotopic masses of peptide with or without modifications were as follows: SP, 1849.9971; SP+M, 1865.9920; SP+Y, 1929.9634; SP+M+Y, 1945.9584. B, in vitro phosphorylation of purified PA3347. Purified wild type (WT), S56A, or S57A GST-PA3347 protein was incubated for 1 h with [{gamma}-32P]ATP in the absence (lane 1) or presence (lanes 2–4) of total P. aeruginosa cell lysate. GST-PA3347 was pulled down with Glutathione-Superflow beads and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (right), followed by autoradiography (left). C, dephosphorylation of GST-PA3347 by purified PA3346. GST-PA3347 was phosphorylated with [{gamma}-32P]ATP by P. aeruginosa cell extract, precipitated with Glutathione-Superflow beads, and incubated with 0, 5, 10, or 20 µg of purified PA3346, 50 mM EDTA, or calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP), respectively. Top, autoradiogram; bottom, Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel. D, extent of dephosphorylation relative to the untreated sample was measured using the image analysis software TotalLab version 1.00 and plotted.

 
More direct evidence indicating that PA3347 is phosphorylated in P. aeruginosa came from three independent in vitro phosphorylation assays. As the identity of the kinase responsible for PA3347 phosphorylation remains elusive, whole P. aeruginosa cell extract, which should provide the required kinase activity for PA3347 phosphorylation, was used in this assay with [{gamma}-32P]ATP and GST-PA3347 purified from E. coli. Phosphorylation of GST-PA3347 could be clearly observed after incubation with the cell lysate (Fig. 8B, lane 2). No auto-phosphorylation activity was observed for PA3347 (Fig. 8B, lane 1).

Ser-56 Is the Only Phosphorylation Residue of PA3347—Because mass spectrometry analysis indicated that Ser-56-containing peptides were phosphorylated, the two serine residues in the peptide, Ser-56 and Ser-57, were individually substituted with alanine in PA3347. In the phosphorylation experiment, no radioactive signal was detected on PA3347-S56A, whereas phosphorylation of PA3347-S57A could be clearly observed (Fig. 8B) that was even stronger than the wild type protein. These results suggest that the conserved Ser-56 residue is subject to phosphorylation regulation.

PA3346 Encodes a Novel Ser/Thr Phosphatase for PA3347 Protein—The next question was whether PA3346 could serve as a functional phosphatase for PA3347. The recombinant GST-PA3347 was first phosphorylated using [{gamma}-32P]ATP, and whole P. aeruginosa cell lysate, purified on glutathione-Sepharose, was then used as the substrate for testing phosphatase activity of recombinant full-length PA3346. As shown in Fig. 8, C and D, the degree of phosphorylation of PA3347 showed a considerable inverse correlation with the input amounts of PA3346, indicating that PA3347 is indeed a target of PA3346 phosphatase activity. Because PA3347 is phosphorylated only on Ser-56, the result is consistent with the bioinformatics finding that PA3346 is a Ser/Thr phosphatase. The phosphatase activity of PA3346 was partially inhibited by the presence of EDTA (Fig. 8, C and D), a known inhibitor of protein phosphatases 2B and 2C (28, 29). The results suggest that a divalent cation is required in the reaction catalyzed by PA3346. Calf intestine alkaline phosphatase was unable to dephosphorylate PA3347 (Fig. 8, C and D).

Phosphorylation of PA3346 Enhances Its Phosphatase Activity—Because PA3346 is a response regulator with a functional phosphatase domain, we test whether phosphorylation of PA3346 in its receiver domain would affect its phosphatase activity. The phosphatase activity of PA3346 was determined using the synthetic substrate DiFMUP, which has been used for the measurement of the activity of several Ser/Thr phosphatases (30, 31). The Km and Vmax values of PA3346 in utilizing DiFMUP as the substrate were found to be 176.33 ± 14.61 µM and 3.18 ± 0.31 µM min-1 mg-1, respectively. PA3346 purified from E. coli exhibited a weak phosphatase activity, but the activity increased by 3-fold when the protein was subject to phosphorylation by incubating with ATP, sensor PA2824 and HptB (Fig. 9). The result therefore indicates that phosphorylated PA3346 is the active form of the enzyme.


Figure 9
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 9.
Activation of PA3346 phosphatase activity by phosphorylation. Phosphatase activity was monitored by measuring fluorescence at indicated times in a fluorescence microplate reader. {blacktriangleup}, PA3346 directly purified from E. coli; •, PA3346 previously phosphorylated by 1 µg of PA2824 and 1 µg of HptB; {circ}, 1 µg of PA2824; {square}, 1 µg of HptB; {triangleup}, blank.

 


Figure 10
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 10.
Phenotypic characterization of mutants defective in hptB, PA3346, or PA3347. A, motility of P. aeruginosa PAO1, MPA45, MJL46, MJL47, and the complemented strains on a swarming plate. B, biofilm formation was evaluated by crystal violet staining and expressed as OD595. The average zone expansion from three independent experiments is displayed. *, statistically significant difference from the wild type (p < 0.005).

 
HptB-mediated Signaling Pathway Controls Swarming Activity in P. aeruginosa PAO1—We have previously shown that HptB is involved in several biological properties of P. aeruginosa, including swarming activity and biofilm formation (16). To further elucidate the functional roles of PA3346 and PA3347, deletion mutants at these two loci were generated, and their behaviors were evaluated. Analysis of swarming ability revealed that the PA3346 and PA3347 mutant, designated MJL46 and MJL47, respectively, significantly exceeded the wild type strain, whereas swarming in MPA45 was severely defective (Fig. 10A). The swarming phenotypes of MJL46, MJL47, and MPA45 could be restored by complementation with a plasmid expressing a functional PA3346, PA3347, and hptB gene, respectively (Fig. 10A). In the complementation with a plasmidborne PA3347 gene, the swarming ability of MJL47 was even decreased.

PA3346 Affects Biofilm Formation in P. aeruginosa—In addition to motility, the kinetics of biofilm formation in these mutants was also examined (Fig. 10B). The biofilm-forming activity of MJL47 was indistinguishable from that of PAO1 with the amount of total biofilm formed reaching its highest point at ~8 h. On the other hand, it took 10 h for MJL46 to accumulate biofilm to the highest level. Unlike MJL46, the hptB mutant MPA45 synthesized and disintegrated biofilm at a faster rate than the wild type strain (Fig. 10B). The biofilm formation in MJL46 [pMMB46] was the same as PAO1. However, the complementary strains MPA45 [pBM2] and MJL47 [pMMB47] exhibited a lower biofilm-forming activity than that of the wild type strain (Fig. 10B). The growth rates of these mutant strains in LB broth were essentially the same (data not shown) and thus apparently did not contribute to the difference in the biofilm forming activity.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Based on the analysis of phosphorelay among 12 hybrid sensors, 3 Hpt proteins and 9 orphan response regulators, we have established a novel signaling network in P. aeruginosa PAO1. Unlike conventional 2CS in which signal transduction from a sensor to a paired response regulator is a common feature, the signaling network elucidated in this study consists of multiple hybrid sensors (PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, and RetS), a single Hpt protein (HptB), and a single response regulator (PA3346) (Fig. 11). Such a signal convergent network reflects how P. aeruginosa could counter a wide range of environmental stresses by evolving a large number of sensor proteins while maintaining a small set of mediator proteins (HptB) to perform the essential responses, such as increasing swarming to move away from an unfavorable environment or providing sufficient phenotypic plasticity to cause infections.


Figure 11
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 11.
A hypothetical scheme for the HptB-mediated phosphorelay system. Upon activation by environmental stress, sensor kinases PA1611, PA1976, PA2824, and RetS autophosphorylate and transfer a phosphoryl group specifically to HptB, which in turn relays the signal to response regulator PA3346. The phosphorylation regulates the Ser/Thr phosphatase activity of PA3346, resulting in increasing its phosphatase activity and dephosphorylation of PA3347. PA3347 is previously phosphorylated at Ser-56 by an unknown kinase, and the phosphorylation may modulate the binding activity of PA3347 by which it releases an anti-{sigma} factor (an unknown factor X) and leads to the expression of genes associated with swarming activity and biofilm formation.

 
Trans-phosphorylation between noncognate 2CS pairs has been reported for organisms other than P. aeruginosa. For example, in Caulobacter crescentus, an Hpt module-containing protein was identified as a functional phosphotransferase and is known to be activated by three different hybrid sensors. This pathway finally activates the response regulator, TacA, which plays a key role in bacterial morphogenesis (21). Similar to C. crescentus, P. aeruginosa also utilizes an Hpt protein as the mediator to integrate signals transmitted from multiple sensors prior to relaying to a single response regulator, PA3346, whereby this pathway appears to have substantial influence over reactions to different environmental stimuli. Both of the systems support the idea that cross-talk in bacterial signal transduction takes place. It is of interest to note that, in the absence of HptB, a slight phosphorylation could be detected in PA3346 co-incubated with PA2824 (Fig. 5A) suggesting certain some hybrid kinase may also interact with regulators independent of HptB. Nevertheless, the impact of such cross-talk is likely to be small, because of the relatively weak reaction compared with that mediated by HptB.

Although all recombinant sensors in this study contain a seemingly similar domain organization, it is not clear why only five of the sensor proteins exhibited autokinase activity. One possible explanation is that the receiver domain in some hybrid sensors is auto-inhibitory for the kinase activity, as demonstrated previously in Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirA (32). Nevertheless, by taking advantage of the reversibility of phosphotransfer between HptB and sensor kinases, an additional sensor protein that interacts with HptB was identified. This finding also implies that Hpt proteins may relay signals between sensor kinases to initiate new signaling processes. The extent of the reverse phosphorylation in vivo is not clear, but it is likely to be low because other factors, such as spatial and temporal patterns of protein synthesis, may restrict the chance of interaction.

The importance of the eukaryotic type Ser/Thr kinases and phosphatases in prokaryotic signal transduction has become an interesting issue since their first discovery in Myxococcus xanthus (33). Bacterial homologues of protein phosphatases have been described to be necessary for cellular functions such as growth, differentiation, and virulence (28, 29), although information concerning their endogenous substrates and activating signals has been limited, particularly in Gram-negative bacteria. Proteins with a PP2C domain are known to play an important role in response to environmental stresses or energy starvation in Gram-positive bacteria (23, 26). According to the current model of {sigma}B regulation in B. subtilis, a PP2C phosphatase triggers the dephosphorylation of an anti-{sigma} antagonist, which in turn binds to an anti-{sigma} factor to result in the release of {sigma}B, and eventually leads to transcription initiation of the target regulon (25, 34). We hypothesize that a similar model could be applied to the HptB-PA3346-PA3347 signaling system, in which PA3347 phosphorylation, controlled by PA3346 phosphatase activity and a yet to be identified protein kinase, affects the anti-{sigma} binding activity of PA3347 and consequently modulates the expression of downstream target genes. The protein phosphatase identified in P. aeruginosa so far are Stp1 and PppA (35, 36), which share weak homology with PA3346. In addition, no investigation of anti-{sigma} antagonists in Gram-negative bacteria has been reported (34, 37). Therefore, this work creates a new direction for the study of this interesting type of regulatory system in Gram-negative bacteria.

Functional studies of the isogenic mutants relating to the HptB-mediated signal transduction indicate that this pathway is involved in regulation of swarming activity and biofilm formation. The mutants investigated in this study displayed quite distinct swarming phenotypes. The swarming motility is totally abolished in the hptB mutant, although the activity is enhanced in the PA3346 and PA3347 mutants. The different phenotypes exhibited by the mutants strongly imply that additional regulatory components also participate in this pathway. In our hypothesis, unphosphorylated PA3347 could bind and regulate the function of an unknown anti-{sigma} factor that regulates the swarming phenotype. Because in the gene knock-out mutant MJL47 the anti-{sigma} factor is able to activate gene expression without inhibitory control, the mutant performs the same phenotype as the phosphatase mutant, MJL46, increasing the swarming activity. However, in our model, we cannot explain the decrease of swarming activity in the hptB mutant. HptB may be capable of regulating a response regulator, which is not included in this study and remains to be discovered.

Until now, the functions of only a few hybrid sensors in P. aeruginosa have been identified. One example is PA4856, which encodes RetS (RtsM) (38, 39). RetS has been shown to be a crucial sensor required for controlling pleiotropic phenotypes such as the expression of the type III secretion system (40) and the inhibition of biofilm development and exopolysaccharide production (38, 39). Similarly, sensor PA2824 was also found to be a negative regulator of biofilm formation (38). Although previous studies have shown RetS signals through the GacS/GacA/RsmZ global regulatory pathway, the missing link between sensor RetS and its direct regulatory factor has not been found. Our data indicate that PA2824 and RetS are capable of phosphorylating HptB, suggesting that these two sensors exert their function through the HptB-PA3346-PA3347 signaling pathway. On the other hand, the hybrid sensor LadS (PA3974) is known to play a counter-regulatory role against RetS (38, 41). LadS was unable to phosphorylate HptB, suggesting that it carries out the regulation through a pathway distinct from HptB-mediated signal transduction.

This study has established a significantly expanded picture of the HptB-mediated signaling pathway, which controls swarming activity and biofilm development in P. aeruginosa (Fig. 11). Nevertheless, our understanding of the phosphorelay system is far from complete. First, several key elements in the pathways remain to be identified and characterized, including the environmental signals detected by the HptB-regulating sensors, the kinase responsible for phosphorylation of PA3347, the anti-{sigma} factor that interacts with PA3347, and the downstream target genes regulated by the pathway. Second, the mechanism by which HptB integrates multiple signals and relays an adequate signal to downstream effectors will also need to be determined. Finally, a detailed molecular mechanism on how phosphorylation would affect the protein activity requires further investigation.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the National Research Program for Genomic Medicine and National Science Council of Taiwan, Republic of China. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

Formula The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Table S1 and Figs. S1–S3. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: 101 Guang Fu Rd. 2nd Sec., Institute of Molecular Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin Chu, 300, Taiwan, Republic of China. Tel.: 886-3-5742910; Fax: 886-3-5742910; E-mail: hychang{at}life.nthu.edu.tw.

2 The abbreviations used are: 2CSs, two-component regulatory systems; {alpha}-RNAP, {alpha}-subunit of RNA polymerase; DIFMUP, 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight; PP2C, protein phosphatase 2C; RT, reverse transcription; X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside. Back



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bijlsma, J. J., and Groisman, E. A. (2003) Trends Microbiol. 11, 359-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kato, M., Mizuno, T., Shimizu, T., and Hakoshima, T. (1997) Cell 88, 717-723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Akerley, B. J., Cotter, P. A., and Miller, J. F. (1995) Cell 80, 611-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Rogov, V. V., Bernhard, F., Lohr, F., and Dotsch, V. (2004) J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1035-1048[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Takeda, S., Fujisawa, Y., Matsubara, M., Aiba, H., and Mizuno, T. (2001) Mol. Microbiol. 40, 440-450[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Lai, Y. C., Peng, H. L., and Chang, H. Y. (2003) J. Bacteriol. 185, 788-800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Janiak-Spens, F., Cook, P. F., and West, A. H. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 377-386[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Xu, Q., Porter, S. W., and West, A. H. (2003) Structure (Camb.) 11, 1569-1581[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Posas, F., Wurgler-Murphy, S. M., Maeda, T., Witten, E. A., Thai, T. C., and Saito, H. (1996) Cell 86, 865-875[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Matsubara, M., and Mizuno, T. (2000) FEBS Lett. 470, 118-124[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Winstanley, C., Kaye, S. B., Neal, T. J., Chilton, H. J., Miksch, S., and Hart, C. A. (2005) J. Med. Microbiol. 54, 519-526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jesaitis, A. J., Franklin, M. J., Berglund, D., Sasaki, M., Lord, C. I., Bleazard, J. B., Duffy, J. E., Beyenal, H., and Lewandowski, Z. (2003) J. Immunol. 171, 4329-4339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rodrigue, A., Quentin, Y., Lazdunski, A., Mejean, V., and Foglino, M. (2000) Trends Microbiol. 8, 498-504[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Stover, C. K., Pham, X. Q., Erwin, A. L., Mizoguchi, S. D., Warrener, P., Hickey, M. J., Brinkman, F. S., Hufnagle, W. O., Kowalik, D. J., Lagrou, M., Garber, R. L., Goltry, L., Tolentino, E., Westbrock-Wadman, S., Yuan, Y., Brody, L. L., Coulter, S. N., Folger, K. R., Kas, A., Larbig, K., Lim, R., Smith, K., Spencer, D., Wong, G. K., Wu, Z., Paulsen, I. T., Reizer, J., Saier, M. H., Hancock, R. E., Lory, S., and Olson, M. V. (2000) Nature 406, 959-964[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Chen, Y. T., Chang, H. Y., Lu, C. L., and Peng, H. L. (2004) J. Mol. Evol. 59, 725-737[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Lin, C. T., Huang, Y. J., Chu, P. H., Hsu, J. L., Huang, C. H., and Peng, H. L. (2006) Res. Microbiol. 157, 169-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  18. Kohler, T., Curty, L. K., Barja, F., van Delden, C., and Pechere, J. C. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 5990-5996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Yamamoto, K., Hirao, K., Oshima, T., Aiba, H., Utsumi, R., and Ishihama, A. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1448-1456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Skerker, J. M., Prasol, M. S., Perchuk, B. S., Biondi, E. G., and Laub, M. T. (2005) Plos Biol. 3, e334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Biondi, E. G., Skerker, J. M., Arif, M., Prasol, M. S., Perchuk, B. S., and Laub, M. T. (2006) Mol. Microbiol. 59, 386-401[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. West, A. H., and Stock, A. M. (2001) Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 369-376[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Delumeau, O., Dutta, S., Brigulla, M., Kuhnke, G., Hardwick, S. W., Volker, U., Yudkin, M. D., and Lewis, R. J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 40927-40937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Adler, E., Donella-Deana, A., Arigoni, F., Pinna, L. A., and Stragler, P. (1997) Mol. Microbiol. 23, 57-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Vijay, K., Brody, M. S., Fredlund, E., and Price, C. W. (2000) Mol. Microbiol. 35, 180-188[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Arigoni, F., Duncan, L., Alper, S., Losick, R., and Stragier, P. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 3238-3242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Lucet, I., Borriss, R., and Yudkin, M. D. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 3242-3245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Jin, H., and Pancholi, V. (2006) J. Mol. Biol. 357, 1351-1372[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Rajagopal, L., Clancy, A., and Rubens, C. E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 14429-14441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Gee, K. R., Sun, W. C., Bhalgat, M. K., Upson, R. H., Klaubert, D. H., Latham, K. A., and Haugland, R. P. (1999) Anal. Biochem. 273, 41-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Pastula, C., Johnson, I., Beechem, J. M., and Patton, W. F. (2003) Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 6, 341-346[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Chang, C. H., Zhu, J., and Winans, S. C. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 4710-4716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Munoz-Dorado, J., Inouye, S., and Inouye, M. (1991) Cell 67, 995-1006[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Bork, P., Brown, N. P., Hegyi, H., and Schultz, J. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 1421-1425[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Mukhopadhyay, S., Kapatral, V., Xu, W., and Chakrabarty, A. M. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 6615-6622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Mougous, J. D., Gifford, C. A., Ramsdell, T. L., and Mekalanos, J. J. (2007) Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 797-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Hughes, K. T., and Mathee, K. (1998) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 52, 231-286[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Goodman, A. L., Kulasekara, B., Rietsch, A., Boyd, D., Smith, R. S., and Lory, S. (2004) Dev. Cell 7, 745-754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Laskowski, M. A., Osborn, E., and Kazmierczak, B. I. (2004) Mol. Microbiol. 54, 1090-1103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Mougous, J. D., Cuff, M. E., Raunser, S., Shen, A., Zhou, M., Gifford, C. A., Goodman, A. L., Joachimiak, G., Ordonez, C. L., Lory, S., Walz, T., Joachimiak, A., and Mekalanos, J. J. (2006) Science 312, 1526-1530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ventre, I., Goodman, A. L., Vallet-Gely, I., Vasseur, P., Soscia, C., Molin, S., Bleves, S., Lazdunski, A., Lory, S., and Filloux, A. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 171-176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Furste, J. P., Pansegrau, W., Frank, R., Blocker, H., Scholz, P., Bagdasarian, M., and Lanka, E. (1986) Gene (Amst.) 48, 119-131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Hoang, T. T., Karkhoff-Schweizer, R. R., Kutchma, A. J., and Schweizer, H. P. (1998) Gene (Amst.) 212, 77-86[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. Wegener-Feldbrugge and L. Sogaard-Andersen
The Atypical Hybrid Histidine Protein Kinase RodK in Myxococcus xanthus: Spatial Proximity Supersedes Kinetic Preference in Phosphotransfer Reactions
J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2009; 191(6): 1765 - 1776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
A. L. Goodman, M. Merighi, M. Hyodo, I. Ventre, A. Filloux, and S. Lory
Direct interaction between sensor kinase proteins mediates acute and chronic disease phenotypes in a bacterial pathogen
Genes & Dev., January 15, 2009; 23(2): 249 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/15/9933    most recent
M708836200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsu, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsu, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement