|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 16, 11064-11071, April 18, 2008
Prostaglandin E2 Attenuates Preoptic Expression of GABAA Receptors via EP3 Receptors* 1 ¶![]() ![]() 3
From the
Received for publication, February 20, 2008
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) has been shown to produce fever by acting on EP3 receptors within the preoptic area of the brain. However, there is little information about the molecular events downstream of EP3 activation in preoptic neurons. As a first step toward this issue, we examined PGE2-induced gene expression changes at single-cell resolution in preoptic neurons expressing EP3. Brain sections of the preoptic area from PGE2- or saline-injected rats were stained with an anti-EP3 antibody, and the cell bodies of EP3-positive neurons were dissected and subjected to RNA amplification procedures. Microarray analysis of the amplified products demonstrated the possibility that gene expression of -aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor subunits is decreased upon PGE2 injection. Indeed, we found that most EP3-positive neurons in the mouse preoptic area are positive for the 2 or 2 GABAA receptor subunit. Moreover, PGE2 decreased the preoptic gene expression of these GABAA subunits via an EP3-dependent and pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway. PGE2 also attenuated the preoptic protein expression of the 2 subunit in wild-type but not in EP3-deficient mice. These results indicate that PGE2-EP3 signaling elicits Gi/o activation in preoptic thermocenter neurons, and we propose the possibility that a rapid decrease in preoptic GABAA expression may be involved in PGE2-induced fever.
Body temperature is controlled by central and peripheral mechanisms such as heart rate, muscle tone, metabolic rate, vasoconstrictor action, and shivering, thereby reaching a new thermoregulatory set point. Fever is characterized as an elevation in body temperature by 1-2 °C and is one of the representative systemic responses against inflammation (1, 2). Fever is a clinically important symptom associated with many serious diseases such as infections, toxonosis, and neoplasia. Fever responses are initiated by cytokines such as interleukin-1 and interleukin-6, which are released from immune cells activated by exogenous pyrogens such as lipopolysaccharide. These cytokines act on the brain vasculature and therein stimulate prostaglandin (PG)4 E2 production (3).
PGE2 has been shown to elicit fever, because aspirin-like drugs exert anti-pyretic actions through the suppression of PGE2 biosynthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, a rate-limiting enzyme of PGE2 synthesis (4, 5). PGE2 displays a broad range of actions including fever generation through its binding to specific receptors on target cells. There are four PGE receptor subtypes, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4, all of which are expressed in the central nervous system (6). We have shown that EP3 plays a pivotal role in inflammation-associated fever, because EP3-deficient mice fail to exhibit fever in response to central administration of PGE2 and interleukin-1β or peripheral administration of interleukin-1β and lipopolysaccharide (7, 8). However, there is still little information about the molecular events downstream of PGE2-EP3 signaling in the central nervous system.
The preoptic area (POA), which is the rostral region of the basal forebrain, has been shown to contain a thermocenter because destruction of this region leads to the inability to generate fever and also because the POA is rich in thermosensory neurons and is sensitive to PGE2-induced fever (reviewed in Ref. 9). Moreover, the level of PGE2 in the POA is well associated with lipopolysaccharide-induced fever, and indomethacin completely abolishes both lipopolysaccharide-induced fever and the increase in PGE2 levels in the POA (2). We previously showed that a number of EP3-expressing neurons exist in the POA (10, 11), and it was recently demonstrated that selective genetic deletion of the EP3 receptors in the POA results in abrogation of the PGE2-induced fever response (12). These results indicated that PGE2 transmits febrile input by acting on the EP3 receptors expressed in the POA. How then does activation of EP3 receptors in the POA neurons lead to fever generation? It has been demonstrated that EP3-expressing neurons project to the rostral raphe pallidus nucleus, where thermogenic sympathetic premotor neurons are located (13), and make As a first step to understanding the molecular basis of PGE2-induced fever generation and to characterizing the EP3-expressing neurons in the POA, we undertook to detect gene expression changes in the POA EP3-expressing neurons upon central administration of PGE2. To analyze the changes in gene expression, specifically in EP3-expressing neurons, we employed the technique of microarray analysis at single-cell resolution. Here we show that the POA EP3-expressing neurons co-express GABA type A (GABAA) receptor subunits and that PGE2-EP3 signaling attenuates GABAA expression levels in the POA in a fever-associated manner.
Animals—Adult male pathogen-free Sprague-Dawley rats (250-350 g; Taconic, Germantown, NY) were used for microarray analysis (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The experiments using rats were approved by the Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. Adult male pathogen-free C57BL/6 mice (25-30 g; SLC Japan, Hamamatsu, Japan) and EP3 (ptger3)-deficient (EP3-/-) mice with a C57BL/6 genetic background (7, 17) were used for subsequent analyses (Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5 and Table 2). The experiments using mice were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Kyoto University. The animals were housed in a light (12 h on/off)- and temperature (22-23 °C)-controlled pathogen-free facility with food and water available ad libitum.
Microarray Analysis of POA Neurons Expressing EP3 Receptors—A flowchart of the experimental strategy used to analyze the gene expression changes that occur in EP3-expressing POA neurons upon PGE2 injection is shown in Fig. 1A. A stainless steel cannula was implanted stereotaxically into the lateral cerebral ventricle of a rat and fixed to the skull with acrylic dental cement (8). PGE2 (500 ng; Sigma) in 5 µl of pyrogen-free 0.9% saline or saline only was injected into the ventricle, and the rectal temperature was monitored. The rats were sacrificed 30 min after the injection and fixed by transcardial perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde. The brains were post-fixed, saturated with a sucrose solution, and then cut into coronal sections (10 µm), which were stained with an anti-rat EP3 rabbit antibody as described previously (11). Single-cell microdissection and RNA amplification were performed essentially as described previously (18). Briefly, sections were incubated with the oligo(dT)-T7 primer and subjected to first-strand cDNA synthesis with reverse transcriptase. With the use of a glass micropipette, the cell bodies of individual EP3-positive neurons were carefully microdissected from the surrounding neuropil and subsequently aspirated (19). Photomicrographs were taken before and after aspiration to assure that the cells had positive staining and that only a single cell was detached (Fig. 1B). Twelve single cells derived from three rats per group (PGE2-injected and saline-injected groups) were pooled and subjected to two-round RNA amplification. The labeled probe was synthesized by converting the amplified antisense RNA to either a Cy3- or Cy5-labeled cDNA probe. The resultant probes were hybridized to Incyte LifearrayTM Chips RAT GEM2. The data were normalized, and the genes were ranked based on the magnitude of differential expression calculated across dye swap experiments as described previously (18). Microarray analysis was repeated independently, and genes showing similar expression changes upon PGE2 injection were selected and presented.
In Situ Hybridization and β-Galactosidase Staining—The DNA probes for GABAA (ionotropic) receptor subunits
Immunofluorescence Microscopy—Coronal sections (14 µm) of adult male EP3+/- mice were fixed and incubated in phosphate-buffered saline containing a blocking reagent. The slides were incubated in phosphate-buffered saline containing an anti-β-galactosidase antibody (1:500; Biogenesis) in combination with an anti-GABAA
Dissection of POA and Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)—Wild type and EP3-/- mice anesthetized with
Immunoblot Analysis—Wild-type and EP3-/- mice were injected with saline or PGE2 and sacrificed 30 min after the injection. The POA was dissected, homogenized in lysis buffer (66 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.9% NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin, respectively). Protein (10 µg) was loaded into separate lanes in a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and blotting was performed as described previously (21). After blocking in nonfat milk, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies diluted with nonfat milk (GABAA 2, 1:500), washed, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. After washing, the membranes were stained with an ECL kit (GE Healthcare) and visualized with the LAS system (Fujifilm, Japan). The densities of the bands for GABAA were quantified using Image Gauge software (Fujifilm). As a normalizing control, an anti-actin antibody (Chemicon, 1:2000 dilution) was used. The specificity of the anti-GABAA 2 antibody was confirmed by the loss of the corresponding band when the antigen peptide-preabsorbed antibody was used (data not shown). POA Slice Culture—We performed slice culture based on a method described previously (22). Briefly, mouse brains were removed and cut into coronal slices containing POAs of 500 µm in thickness under sterile conditions. The slices were transferred onto a 30-mm Millicell-CM insert membrane (Millipore) in 6-well plates. The slices were maintained at 37°C in 3 ml/well culture medium consisting of 50% minimum essential medium/HEPES, 25% Hanks' balanced salt solution, and 25% heat-inactivated horse serum supplemented with 6.5 mg/ml D-glucose and 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin G potassium, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate. The slices were pretreated with or without pertussis toxin (PT) (200 ng/ml; Seikagaku Japan) for 6 h followed by the addition of PGE2 (1 µM). After incubation with PGE2 for 30 min, the POA was dissected from the slices and subjected to RNA extraction and reverse transcription-PCR. Data Analysis—Data are shown as means ± S.E. A comparison between two groups was performed using Student's t test; p values <0.05 were considered significantly different.
Microarray Analysis of Rat POA EP3-positive Neurons upon PGE2 Injection—As a first step to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying EP3-mediated fever generation, we utilized cDNA microarray analysis at single-cell resolution to detect genes in POA EP3-positive neurons with altered expression levels upon PGE2 injection (Fig. 1A). PGE2- and saline-injected rats were sacrificed 30 min after injection, and POA sections from these rats were fixed, stained with an anti-rat EP3 antibody, and subjected to reverse transcription in situ. The positively stained cell bodies were picked up with glass capillaries (Fig. 1B), and pooled. The cDNAs derived from 12 positive cell bodies/group were extracted and amplified as antisense RNAs, which were subjected to cDNA microarray. Of the 8,544 genes represented on the cDNA microarray (Incyte Rat GEM), the genes that showed differential expression values greater than 1.5 or less than -1.5 were selected (18, 23). Similar analysis was repeated independently, and the genes showing similar responses to PGE2 were regarded as differentially expressed genes. After the exclusion of functionally unknown expressed sequence tags, we detected two genes showing more than a 1.5-fold increase and 16 genes showing more than a 1.5-fold decrease upon PGE2 injection (Table 1). Surprisingly, genes down-regulated by PGE2 include vesicle transport-related genes such as syntaxin 1B2 (stx1B2) and synaptophysin (syp), suggesting that PGE2 may alter the vesicle transport status via EP3 receptor. On the other hand, the expression of GABAA receptor genes such as gabrg2 and gabra6 were decreased upon PGE2 stimulation (Fig. 1C and Table 1). Although 6 is the GABAA subunit specifically expressed in the cerebellum, we considered that this result might reflect changes in gene expression of some structurally close GABAA receptor subunits such as 1 or 2, because the cDNA microarray sometimes gives signals for cross-hybridization to structurally close probes. Although GABA is known to be a primary inhibitory transmitter in the central nervous system, it has not been reported that EP3-positive neurons co-express GABAA receptor. In the following studies, we therefore surveyed the GABAA receptor subunits showing expression overlaps with EP3 receptor in the POA.
GABAA Subunits 2 and 2 Are Expressed in EP3-positive Neurons in Mouse POA—Because Wisden et al. (24) previously reported that mRNAs for the 2 and 1 subunits of GABAA receptor are abundantly expressed in POA, we examined RNA expression of 2, 6, 1, and 2 subunits in the mouse POA section. As reported previously (10), the signals for EP3-RNA were detected in the neurons of the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO), medial preoptic nucleus (MPO), and rostral wall of the third ventricle. Similarly, the signals for GABAA 2-RNA were highly concentrated to the regions surrounding the third ventricle in the POA (Fig. 2). The signals for GABAA 2-RNA were distributed more widely than those of EP3 and 2, but strong signals were observed in the regions surrounding the third ventricle in the POA. The signals for GABAA 1-RNA were observed only in a few brain areas but were present in the neurons adjacent to the third ventricle in the POA. However, no significant signals for GABAA 6 were found in the POA. The signals for GABAA 2-, 1-, and 2-RNA were confined to neurons (data not shown). Thus, distribution of EP3 appears to overlap with those of three GABAA receptor genes, and we selected 2 and 2 as candidate subunits colocalized with EP3 receptors in the POA. Although an anti-rat EP3 antibody was used to detect EP3-expressing neurons in the POA, this antibody could not detect mouse EP3 receptor protein effectively (25). Moreover, because all anti-mouse EP3 antibodies that we tested were not suitable for immunohistochemistry, we used EP3+/- mice in which the β-galactosidase (β-gal) gene was "knocked in" at the EP3 gene locus (7). In these animals, EP3-positive cells can be detected by the anti-β-galactosidase antibody (Fig. 4A) (26). Simultaneous staining of the POA sections of EP3+/- mice for β-galactosidase and GABAA 2 revealed colocalization of the positive signals in the MnPO and MPO neurons (Fig. 3 and Table 2). In MnPO and MPO, 71.1 and 90.5%, respectively, of EP3-positive neurons were also positive for 2. Moreover, when we stained the POA sections with anti-β-galactosidase and anti-GABAA 2 antibodies, most of the EP3-positive neurons were also positive for the 2 subunit; in MnPO and MPO, 86.1 and 95.2%, respectively, of the EP3-positive neurons were also positive for 2. These results indicate that most EP3-positive neurons express the GABAA subunits 2 and 2 in the POA.
PGE2 Attenuates Gene Expression of GABAA Receptors in the POA—Because the EP3-positive cell bodies and neuropils are distributed throughout the POA and because most EP3-positive neurons appear to express GABAA subunits, we next tested whether total GABAA transcript levels in the POA could be attenuated by PGE2 stimulation. We therefore examined the effect of central administration of PGE2 on POA gabr gene expression and body temperature in wild-type and EP3-/- mice. When wild-type mice were injected i.c.v. with PGE2, their rectal temperatures were increased by 2 °C at 30 min after the injection, which gradually decreased at 60 min but was still higher than before the injection (Fig. 4A). No such response was observed upon saline injection. Saline injection failed to alter POA gabr expression until 60 min after the injection (Fig. 4B). In contrast, PGE2 significantly attenuated gabrg1 and gabrg2 expression levels at 30 min, and such reduced levels were restored to the original level at 60 min. Furthermore, PGE2 down-regulated gabra2 expression levels at 30 min, and although this was not statistically significant, the PGE2-elicited attenuation in gabra2 expression was still found at 60 min; the effect of PGE2 at this time was significant. In contrast, PGE2 failed to alter the expression of -tubulin (tuba1a) and other housekeeping genes in the POA (data not shown), indicating that the effect of PGE2 is GABAA gene-specific. Furthermore, the PGE2-elicited reduction in gabr expression was not observed in whole brain (data not shown), indicating that such effect of PGE2 is POA-specific. We then examined whether PGE2-elicited attenuation in GABAA gene expression could be observed in the EP3-/- mice, which do not show fever generation in response to PGE2 injection (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, PGE2 failed to affect the expression of any gabr genes in the POA of EP3-/- mice (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that PGE2-elicited attenuation in POA GABAA gene expression is mediated by EP3 receptor. Thus, PGE2-EP3 signaling appears to down-regulate GABAA gene expression in the POA in a fever-associated manner.
PGE2 Attenuates GABAA Receptor Expression at the Protein Level in the POA—Because the gene expression of gabra2 was most closely related to fever generation, we further explored whether PGE2 could attenuate protein levels of GABAA
PGE2 Attenuates GABAA Gene Expression via a PT-sensitive Pathway—Although EP3 receptor has been shown to be critical in PGE2-induced fever generation, it remains uncertain as to which G protein pathway is activated by PGE2-EP3 signaling in the POA neurons. To address this issue, we established a slice culture model of the mouse brain POA. In this culture system, PGE2 significantly attenuated gabrg1 and gabrg2 gene expression levels within the POA at 30 min after PGE2 addition, and a similar tendency was observed for gabra2 expression (Fig. 6). PT treatment of slices abolished the PGE2-elicited decrease in gabr expression. These results indicate that PGE2 attenuates GABAA gene expression via a PT-sensitive pathway.
Although EP3 receptor has been shown to most preferentially couple to Gi1 and Gi2 (27), it is not certain which G protein pathway is involved in the EP3-mediated physiological actions of PGE2 including fever generation. The current study indicates that EP3 receptor couples to Gi/o proteins in the POA neurons, leading to attenuation of gabr gene expression. If such a molecular event reflects the functional changes of the GABAA channel in thermal regulation as discussed below, fever generation could be triggered by the activation of Gi/o in EP3-expressing POA neurons.
One of the most important findings in this study is that most EP3-positive neurons co-express at least the
GABAA receptors are pentameric and are assembled from 18 subunits ( 1-6, β1-3, 1-3, , , , 1-3), and GABAA receptors comprising different subunits show distinct properties in channel pharmacology, cellular localization, and dynamic transport regulation (30, 31). In this study, we found that PGE2 rapidly down-regulates protein expression of the GABAA 2 subunit in the POA. Thus, PGE2-EP3 signaling dynamically modulates the subunit components of GABAA channels within the POA, which may be an interesting hypothesis to be explored as a mechanism of fever. Alternatively, however, considering the lag time for transcript-protein conversion (decreases in GABAA protein levels), the GABAA receptor number could be decreased during the recovery from the fever response (30-60 min). Hence the phenomenon of PGE2-elicited down-regulation of POA gabr gene expression alternatively contributes to recovery from fever (a decrease in body temperature); because of the reduced number of GABAA receptors, the EP3-expressing neurons could become insensitive to negative regulation by GABA. Further analysis should be conducted to address these points. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that PGE2-EP3 signaling attenuates GABAA gene expression within the POA via a PT-sensitive pathway in close association with fever generation. These results will contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying PGE2-induced fever generation and GABA-elicited thermal regulation in the central nervous system.
* This work was supported in part by a grant from the Sankyo Foundation of Life Science and by grants-in-aid for scientific research (B) and on priority areas (Applied Genomics, Mechanisms of Sex Differentiation, and Molecular Brain Science) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan and the Ministry of Health and Labor of Japan, respectively. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by a research fellowship from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.
2 Supported by a fellowship from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. 3 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Kyoto University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. Fax: 81-75-753-4557; E-mail: ysugimot{at}pharm.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
4 The abbreviations used are: PG, prostaglandin; POA, preoptic area; GABA,
This work was begun (by Y. S.) in the laboratory of Dr. James H. Eberwine at the Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania. We are grateful to Dr. Eberwine for generous instruction on single-cell RNA amplification and microarray analysis. We also appreciate Drs. P. Marciano and K. Y. Miyashiro in Dr. Eberwine's laboratory for their invaluable advice and continuous support. We thank Drs. S. Narumiya and E. Segi-Nishida in the Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Kyoto University, for fruitful discussions. We also thank Dr. H. Akiko Popiel and Yumi Nakaminami for careful reading of the manuscript and secretarial assistance, respectively.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||