|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 17, 11280-11292, April 25, 2008
Cyclin E and SV40 Small t Antigen Cooperate to Bypass Quiescence and Contribute to Transformation by Activating CDK2 in Human Fibroblasts*
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cyclin E is overexpressed in many tumors as a result of gene amplification, disrupted proteolysis, and/or alterations in the pRB/E2F pathway. Cyclin E overexpression has been linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer, non-small cell lung carcinoma, larynx squamous cell carcinoma, and adrenocortical tumors (reviewed in Ref. 3). Two main mechanisms for cyclin E-associated tumorigenesis have been considered to date: induction of genomic instability and facilitation of cell cycle progression via deregulation of the pRB pathway and other G1/S events (reviewed in Ref. 3). Previous studies have shown that ectopic expression of cyclin E in mammalian diploid fibroblasts shortens the G1 phase of the cell cycle (4, 5). Cyclin E overexpression also decreased cell size and increased saturation cell density. However, cyclin E overexpression in quiescent cells was not sufficient to bypass mitogenic stimulation for passage trough the G0/G1 transition (4, 5). In contrast, we reported later, that ectopic expression of cyclin E in serum-starved human glioblastoma T98G cells was sufficient to bypass negative controls imposed by pRB family proteins and induce more than one cell division round in the absence of mitogens (6). We also found that cyclin E induced mitogen-independent cell cycle entry in other tumor cells.4 The different outcome to cyclin E deregulation in normal (4, 5) and tumor cells (6) suggests that certain tumor cells exhibit alterations that allow cyclin E to bypass mitogenic stimulation. If this is the case, cyclin E deregulation may facilitate multistep tumorigenesis by allowing tumor cells to proliferate in growth factor deprived environments. In turn, induction of DNA synthesis by deregulated cyclin E could promote cyclin E-dependent genomic instability ensuring further accumulation of transforming alterations.
Since others have shown that microinjection of active cyclin E-CDK2 complexes in normal human fibroblasts (NHF) induces DNA synthesis (7), we sought to determine what prevents cyclin E deregulation in quiescent NHF from inducing passage trough G1 and DNA synthesis. We have found that ectopically expressed cyclin E in serum-starved NHF effectively forms complexes with CDK2, but these complexes are inactive. Coexpression of simian virus 40 small t antigen (st) cooperates with cyclin E to activate CDK2 by triggering phosphorylation of Thr-160 on the T loop and induce mitogen-independent cell cycle entry. Importantly, st and cyclin E also cooperate to bypass distinct forms of quiescence induced by cell saturation density and overexpression of CKIs from the INK and KIP families. Additionally, expression of cyclin E and st induces continued proliferation of density-arrested cells and foci formation. This process requires CDK2 activity. Moreover, since st triggers alterations of cellular signaling also observed in human cancer cells (8, 9) and cyclin E is found deregulated in multiple cancers, our results provide a mechanism for oncogenic cooperativity that may play a role in human multistep tumorigenesis.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recombinant Virus Production and Infection—Recombinant adenoviruses encoding cyclin D1 and cyclin E were provided by Jeffrey H. Albrecht (Hennepin County Medical Center). Adenoviruses encoding p16 were provided by Juan Fueyo (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). Adenoviruses encoding p21 were provided by Wafik El-Deiry (University of Pennsylvania). β-Galactosidase adenoviruses were from Clontech. Adenoviruses encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein were provided by Pilar Ruiz-Lozano (Burnham Institute for Medical Research). Adenoviruses encoding st were provided by Kathleen Rundell (Northwestern University). Adenoviruses encoding p27 were provided by Frank L. Graham (McMaster University). Adenoviruses encoding activated RasL61 and c-Myc were provided by Joseph R. Nevins (Duke University). Adenoviral stocks were amplified using 293 cells and purified by using CsCl density gradient centrifugation. Viral titers were determined with the Adeno-XTM rapid titer kit (BD Bioscience). T98G and Rat-1 cells were infected as previously described (6). NHF cell lines were infected with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 150 plaque-forming units/cell when synchronized by serum starvation or with an MOI of 40 when synchronized by growth to high density.
pBabe-puro-cyclin E was obtained from Bruce Clurman (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center). pBabe-zeo-st, pBabe-zeo-st
110, and pBabe-zeo-stC97S/E102Q were provided by William C. Hahn. 10 µg of retroviral plasmids were cotransfected with 5 µg of pCL-Ampho packaging vector (Imgenex) into 293T cells following the calcium phosphate precipitation method (10). Retroviral particles were harvested at 24 and 48 h post-transfection and used to superinfect exponentially growing BJ-hTERT cells. When indicated, clones were selected in the presence of 1 µg/ml puromycin.
Western Blot Analysis and Immunoprecipitations—Whole cell lysates were obtained in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA, 250 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml aprotinin, and 4 µg/ml pepstatin, as previously described (6). Immunoprecipitations were performed incubating 150–250 µg of protein. Whole cell lysates or immunocomplexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for Western blot analysis as previously described (6). The following antibodies were used for Western blot analysis: cyclin A (C19), cyclin D1 (A12), cyclin D2 (M20), cyclin D3 (C16), cyclin E (HE12), cyclin H (C18), CDK2 (M20), CDK4 (C22), CDK6 (C21), CDK7 (C19), p21 (C19), p27 (C19), p107 (C19), PP2A/Aβ (C20), Ras (C20), and c-Myc (9E10) antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. p16 INK4 and PP2A/C antibodies were from BD. pRB phosphospecific and phospho-CDK2-Thr-160 antibodies were from Cell Signaling. st (419) monoclonal antibodies were a gift from Elizabeth Moran (Temple University). For immunoprecipitations, monoclonal antibodies to p21 (Cell Signaling), p27 (BD Bioscience), and st (Abcam) were used. Anti-phosphohistone-3 (Cell Signaling) and anti-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) (Caltag) were used for immunofluorescence assays and detected with donkey anti-mouse-rhodamine RedX or -fluorescein isothiocyanate and donkey anti-rabbit-fluorescein isothiocyanate secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch).
In Vitro Kinase Assays—CDK2 kinase activity was determined using CDK2 complexes immunopurified from 50 µg of whole cell lysate as previously described (6). CDK7 kinase activity was determined using CDK7 immunocomplexes from 150 µg of whole cell lysate and 150 ng of GST-CDK2-kinase-dead substrate (a generous gift from Philip Kaldis; Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore). CDK2 phosphorylation on Thr-160 was detected by Western blot analysis using phosphospecific antibodies.
DNA content and DNA synthesis measurements—DNA content during the cell cycle was measured on a BD Calibur flow cytometer and quantified with Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences) as described earlier (6). DNA synthesis was determined by measuring BrdUrd incorporation via immunofluorescence. Cells were plated on 12-well clusters and serumstarved for 72 h. Once arrested, cells were transduced with recombinant adenoviruses or restimulated with serum, and 50 µM BrdUrd was added 10 h later and every 12 h for a continuous labeling. Cells were fixed in 1–3% formaldehyde/PBS for 15 min at room temperature and washed with PBS, and the DNA was denatured with 1.5 N HCl for 15 min at room temperature. Nuclear membranes were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 1% bovine serum albumin for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with anti-BrdUrd antibody in PBS plus 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature. Secondary rhodamine-RedX-conjugated antibody was incubated in PBS, 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.5% Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature. Total DNA was stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Cells were visualized under an inverted fluorescence microscope.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Possible reasons for the lack of effects of deregulated cyclin E expression in serum-starved NHF include that cyclin E does not form complexes with CDK2 or fails to activate CDK2. Thus, serum-starved T98G cells and WI38 NHF were transduced with cyclin E adenoviruses or stimulated with serum for the periods of time indicated in Fig. 1D. Whole cell lysates and CDK2 immunocomplexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot analysis using anti-cyclin E antibodies (Fig. 1, D and E). Duplicate CDK2 immunoprecipitates were subjected to in vitro kinase assays using exogenous histone H1 as a substrate (Fig. 1F). Fig. 1D shows that exogenous cyclin E is efficiently expressed in both T98G cells and WI38 fibroblasts. Fig. 1E shows that cyclin E efficiently formed complexes with CDK2 in both T98G and WI38 cells. However, although cyclin E deregulation or FBS stimulation led to CDK2 activation in T98G cells, FBS, but not ectopic expression of cyclin E, led to CDK2 activation in WI38 fibroblasts (Fig. 1F). Thus, complexes are efficiently formed but are not active in NHF. To rule out the possibility that exogenous cyclin E is not expressed in the right cellular compartment in the absence of serum, we determined cyclin E localization. Serum-starved BJ fibroblasts were transduced with cyclin E adenoviruses or stimulated with serum. 24 h later, the cells were fixed and immunostained with antibodies directed to cyclin E. Fig. 1G shows clear nuclear labeling in serum-starved NHF transduced with adenoviral cyclin E. Under larger magnification, we also noted cyclin E staining localized as a dot within the cytoplasm of most cells, consistent with its localization to the centrosome (data not shown). Thus, lack of CDK2-associated activity is unlikely to be due to mislocalization of ectopically expressed cyclin E.
|
Oncogenes often cooperate to induce malignant transformation, and some of these oncogenes exhibit the ability to reduce cellular requirements for growth factors. Thus, we rationalized that one or more cellular/viral oncogenes could cooperate with cyclin E deregulation to bypass the mitogen requirement in NHF, perhaps targeting the same pathways disrupted in the tumor cell lines where cyclin E expression is sufficient to induce mitogen-independent cell cycle entry. Therefore, serum-starved BJ fibroblasts were restimulated with serum or coinfected with recombinant adenoviruses expressing cyclin E and/or c-Myc, oncogenic H-RasL61, cyclin D1, st, and control enhanced green fluorescent protein for 40 h (Fig. 2A). The proportion of cells undergoing DNA synthesis was determined by counting BrdUrd-positive nuclei following incorporation for 30 h prior to in situ cell fixation. BrdUrd incorporation was determined via indirect immunofluorescence using anti-BrdUrd-specific antibodies. As expected, serum stimulation led to labeling of
90% of nuclei. Fig. 2A also shows that cyclin E robustly cooperated with st and, to a lesser extent, with c-Myc, but not H-RasL61 or cyclin D1, to induce S phase entry. All of the oncogene combinations that included cyclin E and st resulted in
40–60% nuclei labeling (see bars marked with an asterisk). st also efficiently cooperated with c-Myc, which is consistent with the observation that st stabilizes c-Myc via PP2A inhibition (11). Since c-Myc is an upstream regulator of cyclin E (12), these results could suggest a linear st/c-Myc/cyclin E pathway. However, the results of Fig. 2A also show limited cooperation when cyclin E and c-Myc are co-expressed (only
20% of the nuclei were labeled), suggesting that st cooperates with cyclin E by mechanisms that are at least partially independent of c-Myc. Also, ectopic expression of st did not result in obvert up-regulation of endogenous c-Myc under these experimental conditions (Fig. 2B). Fig. 2B confirms that all oncogenes were expressed in a representative set of duplicate samples. Considering these data, st may disrupt a checkpoint pathway induced by deregulated cyclin E that prevented CDK2 activation or CDK2-independent cyclin E functions in NHF. Alternatively, st may trigger a mitogenically regulated event that is required for CDK2 activation or CDK2-independent cyclin E functions.
|
Subsequently, we performed CDK2 immunokinase assays that demonstrate that coexpression of cyclin E and st cooperate to activate CDK2 (Fig. 3C), and this activation correlates with Thr-160 phosphorylation and cell cycle entry (Fig. 3, A and B).
CDK activation requires cyclin binding, phosphorylation by CAK, dephosphorylation by CDC25, and an absence of interactions with CKIs (reviewed in Ref. 2). Of these mechanisms, CAK is unique, since its activity is thought to be unregulated during the cell cycle. Thus, we determined whether ectopic expression of cyclin E had any effect on the expression of CKIs and if these effects were modulated by st. Western blot analysis showed that ectopic expression of cyclin E leads to accumulation of both p21 and p27 and that coexpression of st noticeably reduced the steady state levels of these two inhibitors (Fig. 3B and data not shown). However, examination of CKI association with CDK2 complexes via immunoprecipitation with CDK2 antibodies followed by Western blot analysis showed that st does not induce broad disruption of p27/p21 interactions with CDK2. On the contrary, expression of st leads to an increase in the presence of p27 in CDK2 complexes up to 42 h following transduction with the indicated adenoviruses (Fig. 3C). These data strongly suggest that the effects of st on p21/p27 expression are unrelated to CDK2 activation. To further rule out a role for p27 down-regulation in st/cyclin E cooperation in inducing cell cycle entry, we coexpressed cyclin E and SKP2 in quiescent NHF. SKP2 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in targeting p27 and p130 for proteasomal degradation (15–19) and may also target p21 (20). We have previously shown that SKP2 does not induce mitogen-independent cell cycle entry in either T98G cells or NHF, despite inducing slight p27 down-regulation (19, 21). In striking contrast with st, coexpression of SKP2 with cyclin E failed to induce cell cycle entry in NHF (data not shown). Additionally, ectopic expression of cyclin E in both wild type and p21–/– murine embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) failed to induce cell cycle entry (data not shown). Taken together, these results suggest that p27/p21 inactivation is unlikely to be the rate-limiting step triggered by st to induce mitogen-independent cell cycle entry in NHF with deregulated cyclin E.
Our results also show that CDC25A expression is slightly up-regulated by serum and, to a similar extent, by ectopic expression of cyclin E, st, or both (Fig. 3B). However, coexpression of CDC25A with cyclin E did not induce cell cycle entry (data not shown). Also, an increase in CDK2-Y15 phosphorylation, rather than a decrease, was induced by coexpression of cyclin E and st (data not shown). Thus, CDC25A does not seem to be rate-limiting in cells expressing cyclin E, and CDC25A expression cannot substitute for st. On the other hand, Fig. 3B shows that pRB is phosphorylated at both D-type cyclin-CDK4(6) and cyclin E-CDK2-specific residues. Since we have previously shown that G1 cyclin-CDKs apparently maintain substrate specificity when expressed under these conditions (6, 22), these results suggest that CDK4 activity is up-regulated. However, although others have shown that st induces cyclin D1 expression (23), we observed slight down-regulation of both cyclin D1 and D2 following coexpression of cyclin E and st in BJ fibroblasts (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, cyclin D3 was clearly up-regulated. Thus, pRB phosphorylation at CDK4 preferred sites could possibly be due to an increase in cyclin D3-CDK4 activity or, alternatively, activation of D-type cyclin-CDK4 complexes (i.e. by CAK). On the other hand, we have recently shown that PP2A regulates the phosphorylation state of pocket proteins via a dynamic equilibrium with CDKs throughout the cell cycle (24). Thus, the increase in pRB phosphorylation could also be due to inhibition of PP2A activity by st. To determine whether pocket protein phosphorylation by D-type cyclin-CDKs is required for cyclin E and st to induce cell cycle entry in serum-starved NHF, we coexpressed cyclin E and st in the presence of the CDK4/6 inhibitor p16 and determined cell cycle progression and DNA synthesis by flow cytometric and BrdUrd incorporation analyses as well as determining the expression and phosphorylation of relevant proteins. Fig. 4B shows that p16 prevents cell cycle entry induced by FBS but not by cyclin E and st coexpression. In agreement with these results, FBS-stimulated cells expressing p16 do not incorporate BrdUrd, but cells expressing cyclin E/st/p16 do (data not shown). Also, Fig. 4C shows that p16 expression prevents FBS-induced CDK2 activation (Thr-160 phosphorylation), pRB phosphorylation, and cyclin A expression. In contrast, p16 expression does not block cyclin E/st-induced CDK2 activation and cyclin A expression, although it clearly diminishes pRB phosphorylation on Thr-826. Cumulatively, these data demonstrate that cyclin E and st signaling converge downstream of D-type cyclin-CDK activity and that D-type cyclin-CDK activity is not required. These results also suggest that CDK2 phosphorylates pRB on "CDK4-preferred" sites. This is not completely unexpected, since "CDK4-preferred" sites are phosphorylated in MEFs lacking expression of the three D-type cyclins, albeit at a significantly lower level (25).
|
|
|
|
st and Cyclin E Cooperate to Induce Proliferation and Foci Formation—During the course of these experiments, we observed that although NHF ectopically expressing cyclin E and st enter and progress through the cell cycle in the absence of mitogens, they do so more slowly than cells growing in the presence of FBS. Thus, cyclin E-transduced cells are not growing optimally in the absence of serum. In contrast, density-arrested NHF expressing cyclin E and st appeared to efficiently complete normal cell cycles, as observed by the presence of mitotic figures, accumulation of cells in G2 in the presence of nocodazole, and the reaccumulation of cells in G1 after completing mitosis (data not shown). Normal cells as well as immortal/tumor cells that exhibit a normal restriction point exit the cell cycle and become quiescent when grown to high density in the presence of serum. Although the process is not fully understood, both deprivation of mitogens and inhibitory signals induced by surrounding cells are thought to be responsible for this physiological arrest. Importantly, transformed cells grow to very high densities and often can form foci. Therefore, we sought to determine whether cyclin E and st could overcome cell density-induced antiproliferative signals through multiple cycles and continue to proliferate. BJ-hTERT fibroblasts ectopically expressing cyclin E and st continued to grow past confluence for several days (Fig. 8A) and formed foci after 2–3 weeks (Fig. 8B). Of note, cyclin E/st-coexpressing cells were synthesizing DNA 18 days post-transduction. Thus, coexpression of st and cyclin E in density-arrested NHF endows these cells with transformed characteristics. However, these cells are not fully transformed, since they fail to grow in an anchorage-independent manner, even if they are immortalized by hTERT (data not shown).
|
3, which is consistent with the ability of st to disrupt trimeric PP2A complexes. However, st can promote cell cycle progression in reduced serum, but B56
3 knockdown cannot (37). To determine whether the effects of st and cyclin E coexpression on cell proliferation depend on PP2A, we expressed cyclin E alone or in combination with st or st mutants that have been previously described to exhibit reduced PP2A/A binding and transformation activity. st-
110 lacks the C-terminal domain required for PP2A/A binding, and full-length stC97S/E102Q lacks Cys-97, which reduces binding to PP2A/A very significantly (8, 38). We generated BJ-hTERT NHF stably expressing cyclin E (BJ-hTERT-Cyc E) via retroviral infection followed by antibiotic selection. These cells proliferate slightly faster than BJ-hTERT cells in the presence of serum without loss of proliferation potential, and as expected, BJ-hTERT-Cyc E cells become quiescent following serum withdrawal (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 8C, BJ-hTERT-Cyc E cells transduced with st-
110 or mock retroviruses did not grow efficiently past confluence and arrested at a similar cell density by day 5. In contrast, transduction of BJ-hTERT-Cyc E cells with wild type st retroviruses led to continued proliferation past cell confluence to form a dense thick layer of cells with multiple foci that prevented accurate cell counting past day 5, since these cells clamp following trypsinization. Surprisingly, BJ-hTERT-Cyc E cells transduced with stC97S/E102Q retroviruses grew to a higher density than the cells expressing cyclin E alone or in combination with st-
110. This suggests that although PP2A is important for the cooperating ating effects of cyclin E and st in inducing continued proliferation past confluence, other domains of st contribute to these effects. We note, however, that wild type st is consistently expressed at higher levels than the mutants that are defective in PP2A binding (Fig. 8D) (data not shown). To rule out the possibility that stC97S/E102Q effects are due to retention of some PP2A binding activity, we performed immunoprecipitations with anti-st antibodies using extracts normalized for st expression levels, which clearly show that stC97S/E102Q does not bind PP2A/A or PP2A/C (Fig. 8E). Of note, these experiments were carried out with retroviral vectors, demonstrating that our observations are independent of the viral vector utilized to express cyclin E and st. st Promotes CAK Access to Cyclin E-CDK2 Complexes—Because expression of st in serum-starved NHF induces CAK expression and activity consistent with Thr-160 phosphorylation (Fig. 5) (supplemental Fig. 2), we determined whether CAK is also up-regulated by st in density-arrested NHF. However, we did not detect changes in CDK7 expression or activation (data not shown). Thus, the induction of Thr-160 phosphorylation by st must occur through a different mechanism at least in density-arrested cells. One possibility is that st facilitates CAK access to CDK2, which could be otherwise prevented by CKI binding. To determine the composition of the cyclin E-CDK2 complexes harboring CDK2 phosphorylation on Thr-160 and activity, we performed sequential immunoprecipitation/depletion experiments in lysates of serum-starved BJ-hTERT cells transduced with the indicated adenoviruses for 48 h as indicated in Fig. 9. p27 antibodies immunoprecipitated p27 and a fraction of cyclin E and CDK2 (Fig. 9B). p21 antibodies immunoprecipitated p21, a fraction of cyclin E, and a larger fraction of CDK2 (Fig. 9A). Importantly, despite the presence of CDK2 phosphorylated on Thr-160, CDK2 complexes containing p21 and p27 appeared to be inactive (Fig. 9A). Subsequent parallel immunoprecipitation of p21/p27 and mock-depleted lysates with anti-CDK2 antibodies followed by a histone H1 kinase assay confirmed that only cyclin E-CDK2 complexes free of p27/p21 are active (Fig. 9B). Similar results were obtained using density-arrested BJ-hTERT cells transduced with st and/or cyclin E adenoviruses (data not shown). Considering that p27/p21 and CAK compete for the same surfaces on CDK2 (39, 40) and because a large fraction of CDK2 is phosphorylated on Thr-160 in cells expressing cyclin E and st, these results suggest that st facilitates, at least, transient CAK access to CDK2. Despite this, the majority of CDK2 ends up bound to CKIs and inactive. Thus, only a relative small fraction of CDK2 complexes is in the active state even with potent induction of Thr-160 phosphorylation by st.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
st Triggers CDK2 Activation by Promoting Thr-160 Phosphorylation—Our data show that st induces CAK activity by increasing the levels of cyclin H-CDK7 complexes in serum-starved NHF. st-induced CAK activity is comparable with that induced via FBS stimulation. However, st expression in density-arrested NHF does not increase CDK7 activity. Structural studies have suggested that the binding of CAK and KIPs to CDK2 is mutually exclusive (39, 40). Although CAK may only phosphorylate Thr-160 on CDK2 bound to cyclin E free of KIPs, it is clear that the result of st expression is the accumulation of CDK2 phosphorylated on Thr-160 independently of whether these complexes are bound to KIPs. Thus, our data suggest that st facilitates CAK "access" to newly synthesized CDK2 prior to its binding to KIPs and/or promotes transient dynamic exchange between KIPs and CAK that facilitate Thr-160 phosphorylation despite maintaining the levels of KIPs bound to CDK2. It is important to underscore that st can induce CDK2 phosphorylation on Thr-160 even in immortalized NHF ectopically expressing cyclin E arrested by overexpression of p21/p27 (Fig. 7D). Under these conditions, the levels of p27/p21 far exceed the levels of endogenous KIPs in quiescent NHF even when they forcibly express cyclin E. Regardless, it is clear that st shields a small portion of cyclin E-CDK2 from p27/p21 binding, and these are the complexes that exhibit CDK2 activity.
Bypassing Quiescence States Induced by Multiple Signals—Our results show that cyclin E and st cooperate to bypass quiescence induced by serum starvation, contact inhibition, and overexpression of KIPs and INKs despite the fact that these quiescent states are distinct and dependent on the initiating signal (35). Indeed, it has been reported that one characteristic of the quiescent stage induced by serum starvation and growth to high density is a pattern of gene expression that enforces the reversibility of this stage, at least in part, by suppressing terminal differentiation. These expression signatures are not recapitulated when the quiescent stage is induced by overexpression of CKIs (35). Thus, cyclin E and st are potent negative regulators of the quiescent stage when coexpressed in normal human cells.
A previous study has shown that coexpression of c-Myc and oncogenic Ras in rat embryo fibroblasts (REF52 cell line) made quiescent in the presence of 0.25% serum results in cell cycle entry (44). This oncogene combination did not result in potent induction of DNA synthesis in NHF (Fig. 2). Our serum starvation experiments were performed in the complete absence of serum, which depletes survival factors that might be required under certain cellular instances. In the absence of survival factors, certain combinations of oncogenes may fail to induce cell cycle progression if they also trigger cell senescence and/or cell death. We did not observe overt cell death induced by combinations of oncogenes that failed to induce DNA synthesis at the time points under study. However, we cannot rule out these effects at longer time points. It is also conceivable that st plays a survival function in the absence of serum that other oncogenes cannot perform.
Cyclin E and st in Transformation and Tumorigenesis—Cyclin E is overexpressed and has been linked to poor prognosis in a variety of tumors (reviewed in Ref. 3). Two mechanisms for cyclin E-associated tumorigenesis have been considered to date: induction of genomic instability and facilitation of cell cycle progression via deregulation of the pRB pathway and/or other G1/S events (reviewed in Ref. 3). Previous studies have shown that ectopic expression of cyclin E in NHF shortens the G1 phase of the cell cycle but is not sufficient to bypass mitogenic stimulation (5). In contrast, ectopic expression of cyclin E in quiescent human glioblastoma T98G cells is sufficient to bypass negative controls imposed by pRB family proteins and induce more than one round of cell division (6). This difference could be explained by our observation that cyclin E expression is not sufficient to activate CDK2 in NHF but does so in T98G cells (Figs. 1F and 3C). This is consistent with the finding that microinjection of purified active cyclin E-CDK2 complexes induces DNA synthesis in NHF (7). Together, these results suggest that certain tumor cell lines exhibit signaling alterations that make cyclin E protein levels the rate-limiting event required for CDK2 activation, which in turn mediates cyclin E-induced proliferating effects. In contrast, in NHF, cyclin E overexpression requires at least limited mitogenic stimulation (Fig. 6) or coexpression of st (Figs. 2A, 3A, and 4B) to bypass a rate-limiting step for CDK2 activation and progression through S phase. It is remarkable that in density-arrested NHF, st and cyclin E induced continued proliferation and foci formation, demonstrating that oncogene-induced signaling alterations render cyclin E transgene oncogenic in human cells. In this regard, transgenic mice expressing cyclin E under the control of a T-cell-specific CD2 promoter treated with N-methylnitrosourea develop clonal lymphomas with variable latency and penetrance, which indicates that additional alterations are needed (45). Importantly, the lymphoma T cells expressed high levels of CDK2 activity, whereas normal T cells expressing cyclin E did not. Thus, as in NHF, CDK2 activation rather than cyclin E expression is coupled to cell transformation. Indeed, we find that CDK2 activity is essential for escaping quiescence and proliferation when driven by cyclin E/st coexpression (Fig. 10).
Our results may seem to contrast with recent work indicating that the requirement of cyclin E for oncogene-mediated transformation in MEFs is independent of CDK2 activation (46). However, this is not the case, because st is not required for transformation of MEFs. Therefore, the CDK2 requirement for transformation described here might be restricted to alterations in human cells mimicked by st expression and cyclin E deregulation. In fact, CDK2 knockdown or pharmacologic inhibition specifically inhibits human melanoma cell proliferation and colony formation, indicating that CDK2 activity is required in certain human cancers (47), despite being dispensable for proliferation of other human tumor cells (48). Moreover, in mouse Ras-dependent skin tumorigenesis models where CDK4 expression is driven by a tissue specific promoter, ablation of CDK2 results in decreased incidence and multiplicity of skin tumors (49). In contrast, CDK2 ablation does not affect the incidence of c-Myc-induced tumors.
Alternatively to the proposition that cyclin E expression is not the only rate-limiting factor for CDK2 activation in quiescent NHF, normal cells could have mechanisms to prevent cyclin E activation upon its unscheduled up-regulation. In this regard, others have shown that cyclin E expression in proliferating NHF leads to p53/p21 induction and eventually growth arrest (50). Since T98G cells have a disrupted p53 pathway, this could explain why quiescent T98G cells enter the cycle when cyclin E is overexpressed. Moreover, our results show that cyclin E expression in quiescent NHF induces p21 expression. However, st induces CDK2 activation without altering the overall level of KIPs associated with the cyclin E-CDK2 complex (Fig. 3C), suggesting that st is not simply bypassing a p53/p21 checkpoint.
In primary human cells immortalized by expression of hTERT, expression of st, LT, and oncogenic Ras is sufficient for malignant transformation, which is defined as anchorage-independent growth in vitro and tumorigenesis in nude mice (8, 51). In the absence of hTERT, morphological transformation occurs, but the transformed clones are not immortal (52). Of note, st is not required for transformation of MEFs, which are efficiently transformed by LT and activated Ras (8). Thus, the pathways disrupted by st are critical for transformation of human cells, unveiling a key difference in tumorigenesis between rodent and human cells. In our study, cyclin E and st induced continued proliferation and foci formation in high density arrested cells. However, these two oncogenes were not sufficient to induce anchorage-independent growth even in hTERT-immortalized NHF (data not shown), indicating that cyclin E and st are not sufficient for full malignant transformation in vitro. This is consistent with the observation that malignant transformation of human cells requires hTERT, oncogenic Ras, st expression, and inactivation of the p53 and pRB pathways (51). Considering that activated Ras cooperates with cyclin E in the transformation of rodent fibroblasts (53) and that Ras-CDK4-dependent tumorigenesis in the mouse skin is susceptible to CDK2 ablation (49), it is possible that full malignant transformation by coexpression of cyclin E and st in NHF requires alterations in Ras signaling. In regard to the selectivity between cooperating oncogenes, it is also important to note that st did not cooperate with cyclin D1 to induce mitogenic independent cell cycle entry (Fig. 2) despite previous observations demonstrating that cyclin D1 deregulation, like cyclin E, induces mitogenic independent growth in certain tumor cell types (6). Moreover, although c-Myc is upstream of cyclin E and cooperates with p27 loss to increase cyclin E-CDK2 activity in murine lymphomas (54), it did not cooperate as efficiently as st with cyclin E in inducing DNA synthesis in NHF (Fig. 2). This suggests that the mechanism by which st activates CDK2 is independent of the well characterized effects of st on c-Myc stabilization (11).
Taken together, these results strongly suggest that CDK2 plays an important role in tumorigenesis in certain human cells characterized by cyclin E deregulation and alterations in pathways targeted by st. Considering that CDK2 activity appears to be redundant in normal cells, CDK2 emerges as a potential therapeutic target for a defined set of tumors.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1 and S2. ![]()
1 Supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ministry of Education and Culture of Spain. ![]()
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Temple University School of Medicine, AHP Bldg. Rm. 308, 3307 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140. Fax: 215-707-5562; E-mail: xavier{at}temple.edu.
3 The abbreviations used are: CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; CKI, CDK inhibitor; NHF, normal human fibroblast(s); st, small t antigen; FBS, fetal bovine serum; MOI, multiplicity of infection; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PI, propidium iodide; FACS, flow-activated cell sorting; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; MEF, mouse embryo fibroblast; Cyc E, cyclin E. ![]()
4 E. Sotillo, J. Garriga, A. Kurimchak, and X. Graña, unpublished observations. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Sotillo, J. Garriga, A. Padgaonkar, A. Kurimchak, J. G. Cook, and X. Grana Coordinated Activation of the Origin Licensing Factor CDC6 and CDK2 in Resting Human Fibroblasts Expressing SV40 Small T Antigen and Cyclin E J. Biol. Chem., May 22, 2009; 284(21): 14126 - 14135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zheng, Y.-Y. Cho, A. T.Y. Lau, J. Zhang, W.-Y. Ma, A. M. Bode, and Z. Dong Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 3-Mediated Activating Transcription Factor 1 Phosphorylation Enhances Cell Transformation Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7650 - 7660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |