|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 17, 11565-11574, April 25, 2008
A Novel Endogenous Human CaMKII Inhibitory Protein Suppresses Tumor Growth by Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest via p27 Stabilization*
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(hCaMKIIN
), which directly interacts with activated CaMKII and effectively inhibits CaMKII activity. hCaMKIIN
expression is negatively correlated with the severity of human colon adenocarcinoma. Overexpression of hCaMKIIN
inhibits colon adenocarcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo by arresting the cell cycle at the S phase through its conserved inhibitory region (27CIR), whereas silencing the hCaMKIIN
expression accelerates tumor growth and cell cycle progression. We found that the effect of hCaMKIIN
on cell cycle is correlated with up-regulation of p27 expression, which may be due to the inhibition of proteasome degradation, but not transcriptional regulation, of p27. Moreover, hCaMKIIN
deactivated MEK/ERK, which is prerequisite to the inhibition of Thr-187 phosphorylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation of p27, causing the inhibition of S-phase progression of cell cycle. The findings underscore a link between hCaMKIIN
-mediated inhibition of CaMKII activity and p27-dependent pathways in controlling tumor cell growth and cell cycle and imply a potential application of hCaMKIIN
in the therapeutics of colon cancers. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CaMKII inhibitors can block CaMKII activity by connecting Ca2+/CaM binding site or affecting its catalytic function. The CaMKII inhibitors used in the previous studies were the synthesized chemical reagents such as KN-62 (7) and KN-93 (8), or synthetic inhibitory peptide such as AIP (9). These inhibitors of CaMKII have been shown to inhibit CaMKII-dependent function in tumor cells, causing cell growth inhibition by impairment of cell cycle progression or induction of apoptosis (10–13). The effect of CaMKII inhibitors on cell cycle was associated with changed expression levels of cell cycle-related proteins (6, 11). For example, treatment of HeLa cells with KN-93 results in a cell cycle blockade in the G2 phase. Similarly, KN-93 could decrease cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) 4 activity by reducing cyclin D1 levels and cdk2 activity by enhancing p27Kip1 (p27) expression, causing cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase. Up to now, three endogenous CaMKII inhibitory proteins have been identified. Two rat brain-derived CaMKII inhibitors rCaMKIINβ and rCaMKIIN
interact with the activated CaMKII and inhibit CaMKII activity (14, 15). We have identified a human CaMKII inhibitory protein, hCaMKIINβ, and shown that it inhibits human colon adenocarcinoma cell growth (16). However, Up to now there is no report about the physiological functions and the underlying mechanisms of endogenous CaMKII inhibitors in cell cycle progression.
On the basis of identification of hCaMKIINβ (16), here we report the functional characterization of another novel endogenous human CaMKII inhibitory protein, designated as human CaMKII inhibitory protein
(hCaMKIIN
), and hypothesize that hCaMKIIN
has suppressor effects on colon tumorigenesis. We find a negative correlation of hCaMKIIN
expression with the severity of human colon adenocarcinoma, and hCaMKIIN
can suppress growth of colon adenocarcinoma both in vitro and in vivo. We also demonstrate that the effect of hCaMKIIN
on cell cycle is correlated with up-regulation of p27 expression, which may be due to the inhibition of proteasome degradation but not transcriptional regulation of p27. Moreover, hCaMKIIN
deactivated MEK/ERK, which is prerequisite to the inhibition of Thr-187 phosphorylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation of p27, causing the inhibition of S-phase progression of cell cycle. The findings suggest that the novel endogenous human CaMKII inhibitor hCaMKIIN
may be a functional growth inhibitor for colon tumor cells by inducing p27 accumulation and then cell cycle arrest, and represents a potential manner to control colon cancer development.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
antibodies were from Sigma. An hCaMKIIN
-specific polyclonal antibody was raised against affinity chromatography-purified GST-KIIN
1–41 fusion protein, and the antibody specificity was confirmed by Western blot and immunohistochemical staining for no cross-reactivity with hCaMKIINβ.
Molecular Cloning and Vector Construction—The full-length hCaMKIIN
cDNA was assembled in silico by searching the NCBI data base and amplified by reverse transcription-PCR from bone marrow stromal cells. The His-tagged expression vectors of full-length and domain-truncated mutants of hCaMKIIN
(as illustrated in Fig. 1C), including pKIIN
, pKIIN
1–41, pKIIN
1–53, pKIIN
1–68, and the FLAG-tagged expression vectors of CaMKII
(pFLAG-CaMKII), and CaMKII
with H282 mutated to R (H282R) were constructed by PCR cloning and PCR mutation. The hCaMKIIN
siRNA-generating plasmid, pI-KIIN
, was constructed using the GeneSuppressor system (Imgenex). Vectors were transfected into cells using Lipofectamine2000 reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Unless specified, cells were subjected to analysis 48 h post-transfection. To express GST fusion proteins, the code region of hCaMKIIN
and its mutants were cloned in-frame into pGEX-4T3 vector (Amersham Biosciences).
Tissue Microarray—The human tissue arrays of normal and neoplastic colon tissues (Cybrdi, Shanxi, China) were fixed with formalin, embedded with paraffin, and immunostained with anti-hCaMKIIN
antibody by standard immunohistochemistry protocol as described previously (17). The secondary antibody was used alone as a negative control.
RNA Interference—The p27 siRNA was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The hCaMKIIN
-specific siRNA (si-KIIN
, 5'-GCAAGCGGGUUGUUAUUGATT) and scrambled control (si-Non, 5'-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT) were synthesized by GeneChem (Shanghai, China). siRNA was delivered into the cells using Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) (17).
Western Blotting, Co-precipitation, Immunoprecipitation, and GST Pulldown Assay—Cells were lysed in cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology) or SDS loading buffer. The lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with appropriate antibodies. For co-precipitation, after transfection, whole cell lysates were extracted and the His-tagged proteins were precipitated with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid beads (Pierce). Alternatively, cell lysates were incubated with the relevant antibody followed by Protein G-plus-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The immunoprecipitates were washed with cell lysis buffer and subjected to Western blot analysis. For GST pulldown assay, pFLAG-CaMKII was transfected into LoVo cells, and the whole cell lysates were extracted. About 100 µg of cellular proteins was incubated with 100 µg of purified GST fusion proteins and glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Pierce) with or without 3 mM CaCl2. The precipitates were subjected to Western blot analysis.
Cell Growth Assay—The in vitro growth of transfected cells was measured by MTT dye reduction (18) and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. For the in vivo evaluation of tumor growth, 2 x 106 LoVo or HT-29 cells were inoculated into BALB/c nu/nu athymic mice (4–5 weeks of age, BK Experimental Animal Co.) subcutaneously. When tumor grew to 2.5–3 mm in diameter, mice were randomly divided into three groups of six mice. Naked DNA was delivered into pre-established tumors by in vivo electroporation using an ECM 830 Square Wave Electroporation System (BTX) (18). Tumor growth was measured every 5 days. The tumor volume was calculated as follows: V = 1/2(a x b2) (a, maximum tumor diameter; b, diameter at 90° to a) (19). Data were expressed as mean ± S.E., and analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis.
Cell Cycle Analysis—Cells were fixed with 70% ice ethanol, treated with 20 µg/ml RNase A (Sigma), stained with 20 µg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma), and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences) for cell cycle distribution.
Kinase Assay—CaMKII kinase activity was assayed by CaMKII assay kit (New England Biolabs). For cdk2 kinase assay, 300 µg of cellular proteins was incubated with anti-cyclin A or cyclin E antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) pre-linked to protein G-Sepharose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The immunoprecipitates were subjected to kinase assay containing 5 µg of H1 histone (Calbiochem) and 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (10 µM, Amersham Biosciences) for 15 min at 30 °C, and then SDS-PAGE. [32P]H1 histone was then visualized by autoradiography. Raf-1 and MEK1 activity was evaluated by Raf-1 kinase cascade assay kit and MEK1 assay kit (Upstate), respectively.
Luciferase Assay—Cells were transfected with p27PF or pGVB2 control vector, and 48 h post-transfection luciferase activity was determined using a Luciferase Reporter Assay kit (Clontech) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical Analysis—Statistical analysis (Cochran-Mentel-Haenszel test) was performed using the computer program SPSS Version 10.2.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Is a Novel Human Endogenous CaMKII Inhibitory Protein—hCaMKIIN
cDNA was identified by homology search and in silico assembly using human CaMKIINβ (hCaMKIINβ) cDNA sequence (16) and obtained by PCR amplification from bone marrow stromal cells. The hCaMKIIN
cDNA encodes a 78-residue protein with a molecular mass of 8556.62 Da and an isoelectric point of 5.22. The novel protein shares high homology with the known CaMKII inhibitory proteins (CaMKIINs), including rat CaMKIIN
(rCaMKIIN
, 97% identity) (15), rCaMKIINβ (79% identity) (14), and hCaMKIINβ (65% identity) (16) (Fig. 1A). Based on its high homology with rat CaMKIIN
and its inhibitory effect on CaMKII activity (see below), this novel protein was named as human CaMKII inhibitory protein alpha (hCaMKIIN
). The full-length sequence was submitted into the NCBI GenBank data base under accession number AY204901. Sequence analysis revealed a highly conserved 27-residue region in the C-terminal of CaMKIINs (Fig. 1A, represented by the solid line), which was referred to as 27-residue conserved inhibitory region (27CIR) throughout this report.
To characterize hCaMKIIN
as a CaMKII inhibitor, we examined the interaction between both molecules. First, immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated the interaction between endogenously expressed hCaMKIIN
and CaMKII (Fig. 1B). Second, by using a co-immunoprecipitation assay, we found that exogenously expressed hCaMKIIN
and its 27CIR domain-truncated mutants (illustrated in Fig. 1C) all co-precipitated at different levels with CaMKII after ionomycin treatment (to elevate the calcium concentration and activate CaMKII), but not CaMKII without ionomycin stimulation (Fig. 1D). Finally, we performed a GST pulldown assay to further examine in vitro protein interaction. Purified recombinant GST-KIIN
, GST-KIIN
1–68, GST-KIIN
1–53, GST-KIIN
1–41, and GST-27tide, but not GST control, were bound to CaMKII in the presence of calcium (Fig. 1D) but not in the absence of calcium. These results suggest that the interaction of hCaMKIIN
with CaMKII requires CaMKII activation by calcium, and that the 27CIR in hCaMKIIN
is not essential but sufficient for this interaction.
To determine the effect of hCaMKIIN
on CaMKII kinase activity, we used an in vitro kinase assay based on substrate phosphorylation by CaMKII. Phosphorylation of substrate by CaMKII was significantly suppressed by GST-KIIN
, GST-KIIN
1–68, GST-KIIN
1–53, and GST-27tide proteins in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1E). The deletion of the last 10 residues (GST-KIIN
1–68) did not obviously affect the inhibitory effect, and further truncation at residue 53 reduced its inhibitory capacity by 50–60%. However, GST-KIIN
1–41 without the 27CIR did not exhibit any inhibitory effect. It's of note that 27CIR alone effectively inhibited CaMKII activity. Autonomous CaMKII activity in cells was inhibited by overexpression of hCaMKIIN
but increased by down-regulation of hCaMKIIN
expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 1E). Similarly, pKIIN
1–41 did not inhibit CaMKII activity while other mutants effectively inhibited CaMKII activity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that hCaMKIIN
inhibits CaMKII activity in a dose-dependent manner and that the 27CIR plays a key role in its inhibitory capacity.
hCaMKIIN
Expression Is Negatively Correlated with the Severity of Human Colon Adenocarcinoma—By determining the tissue and cellular expression of hCaMKIIN
, we found hCaMKIIN
in all the normal human tissues except skeletal muscle, with the highest expression in colon, small intestine, and ovary (Fig. 2A). hCaMKIIN
is also expressed in several human solid tumor cells such as HT-29 (grade I colon adenocarcinoma) and LS-174T (grade II), but not in human colon adenocarcinoma cells LoVo (grade III), SW480, and SW620 (grade III) (Fig. 2, A and B). This expression pattern is different from that of hCaMKIINβ, because hCaMKIINβ is not expressed in colon tissues and SW480 cells (16).
The expression pattern of hCaMKIIN
also promoted us to further examine its expression in normal and neoplastic tissue specimens of human colon using anti-hCaMKIIN
polyclonal antibody. To our interest, the results of tissue microarray showed that hCaMKIIN
expression was inversely correlated with the severity (grade) of human colon adenocarcinoma (Fig. 2C). Generally, 66.2% (49/74) of colon adenocarcinoma samples were positive for hCaMKIIN
expression, compared with 88.2% of margin tissue and 91.3% of normal colon samples (p < 0.0001 versus normal and margin group, Fig. 2D). In human colon adenocarcinomas, 86.7% (13 of 15) of grade I tumors were positive for hCaMKIIN
expression, whereas 75.6% (31 of 41) of grade II tumors were positive. Strikingly, only 27.8% (5 of 18) of grade III tumors were positive for hCaMKIIN
expression (p < 0.0001 versus normal, margin, grade I and grade II group), and the expression level was also relatively low. These results revealed a negative correlation of hCaMKIIN
expression with the provenance and progression of human colon adenocarcinoma, suggesting that hCaMKIIN
may be involved in the development of colon adenocarcinoma.
hCaMKIIN
Suppresses Human Colon Adenocarcinoma Cell Growth Depending on Its Inhibition of CaMKII Activity—The negative correlation of hCaMKIIN
expression with the severity of human colon adenocarcinoma led us to evaluate whether overexpression of hCaMKIIN
affects tumor cell growth in vitro. Several human colon adenocarcinoma cells including LoVo, SW480, and SW620 cells (negative for endogenous hCaMKIIN
expression), HT-29 and LS-174T cells (positive for hCaMKIIN
expression) were transfected with hCaMKIIN
expression plasmid, pKIIN
, and then cell growth was analyzed by MTT assay. Western blot using anti-hCaMKIIN
antibody confirmed the hCaMKIIN
protein expression in the cell lines (supplemental Fig. S1A). The growth of LoVo (Fig. 3A), SW480 and SW620 cells (Fig. 3B) was markedly inhibited by hCaMKIIN
overexpression (p < 0.05), whereas that of HT-29 and LS-174T cells was not significantly affected (Fig. 3B). The evaluation of cell proliferation by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assay also confirmed the inhibitory effect of hCaMKIIN
on the growth of tumor cells, which were negative for endogenous hCaMKIIN
expression (Fig. 3C). We next assessed the effects of depleting endogenous hCaMKIIN
by using hCaMKIIN
-specific siRNA (si-KIIN
) in HT-29 and A549 cells (supplemental Fig. S1A). Down-regulation of hCaMKIIN
expression markedly accelerated growth of HT-29 and A549 cells (Figs. 3A, 3C, and supplemental S2A, p < 0.05), suggesting that signaling through endogenous hCaMKIIN
, not just exogenous hCaMKIIN
, induced tumor growth suppression.
|
was determined by domain truncation analysis. As demonstrated in Fig. 1E, the 27CIR was essential for the inhibition of CaMKII activity of hCaMKIIN
. Consistent with these results, removal of the last 10 residues (e.g. pKIIN
1–68) did not affect the inhibitory effect when compared with full-length hCaMKIIN
, and pKIIN
1–53 (truncated in the middle of the 27CIR) reduced inhibitory potency, whereas pKIIN
1–41 (without the 27CIR) abolished the inhibitory effect on LoVo cell growth (Fig. 3, A and C). To give more direct evidence that hCaMKIIN
indeed inhibits tumor growth through inactivating CaMKII, we used KN-62, a specific chemical inhibitor for CaMKII, to inhibit the CaMKII activity in LoVo cells, and then evaluated tumor cell growth after hCaMKIIN
overexpression by MTT assay. The results showed that the overexpression of hCaMKIIN
lost its tumor-suppressing ability after CaMKII activity was inhibited by KN-62 (supplemental Fig. S3). These data suggest that the inhibitory effect of hCaMKIIN
required its inhibitory capacity to CaMKII activity.
|
into human colon adenocarcinoma could mediate therapeutic effects in vivo. Purified hCaMKIIN
expression plasmid pKIIN
was delivered into the established LoVo tumor in nude mice by in vivo electroporation. Immunohistochemistry analysis using anti-hCaMKIIN
antibody confirmed hCaMKIIN
protein expression in tumor tissues (supplemental Fig. S1B), indicating the effective in vivo delivery of pKIIN
plasmid. In situ expression of hCaMKIIN
significantly inhibited the growth of established tumors in vivo (Fig. 3D, p < 0.05). On the other hand, purified hCaMKIIN
siRNA-generating plasmid, pI-KIIN
, was delivered into the established HT-29 tumor, and the accelerated tumor growth was observed (Fig. 3D, p < 0.05). Taken together, these findings indicate that hCaMKIIN
inhibits tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo.
hCaMKIIN
-mediated CaMKII Inhibition Blocks Cell Cycle Progression by Up-regulating p27 Expression—To cast light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the growth inhibition of hCaMKIIN
in colon adenocarcinoma cells, we evaluated the effect of hCaMKIIN
on cellular apoptosis and cell cycle progression. Overexpression of hCaMKIIN
did not induce cellular apoptosis as assayed by Annexin V/PI staining followed by FACS analysis (data not shown). However, FACS analysis of cell cycle distribution showed an accumulation of cells in the S phase after transfection with pKIIN
, pKIIN
1–68, or pKIIN
1–53 in LoVo cells, with a concomitant reduction in the number of cells in G1 phase (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the cells are arrested in the S phase and that the G1/S transition is not inhibited. Further confirming the regulation of cell cycle by hCaMKIIN
, cell cycle analysis of HT-29 and A549 cells transfected with si-KIIN
revealed decreased cell number in S phase (Fig. 4A and supplemental Fig. S2B). The result indicates that a cell-cycle checkpoint might be activated to block the completion of DNA replication in S phase.
To confirm the effect of hCaMKIIN
on cell cycle progression, siRNA rescue assay was performed. si-KIIN
-transfected HT-29 cells were transfected with a domain-truncated mutant of hCaMKIIN
, pKIIN
1–53, which would not be targeted by the synthetic siRNA. Cell cycle analysis revealed that overexpression of hCaMKIIN
1–53 in hCaMKIIN
-knockdown HT-29 cells could rescue the decrease in cell number of S phase (Fig. 4B), which further indicated the vital role of hCaMKIIN
in S-phase progression. Therefore, it is the interference of the completion of DNA replication and then the S-phase progression, but not cell death caused by apoptosis, that is responsible for the growth inhibition of LoVo cells by hCaMKIIN
.
|
inhibitory effect on cell cycle is dependent on the inhibition of endogenous CaMKII, we then examined the regulation of endogenous hCaMKIIN
expression and CaMKII activity in cell cycle progression in HT-29 cells synchronized in early G1, S, and G2/M phases (supplemental Fig. S4A). hCaMKIIN
mRNA was abundant in the cells of S and G2/M phases and low in G0/G1 phase (supplemental Fig. S4B). Accordingly, the kinase activity of endogenous CaMKII was high in the cells of G0/G1 phase but much lower in S and G2/M phases (supplemental Fig. S4C). This is consistent with the endogenous hCaMKIIN
expression and further confirms the blocking of endogenous hCaMKIIN
on S-phase progression.
We next explored the mechanism by which signaling through hCaMKIIN
could interfere the cell cycle progression. Cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase complex plays an important role in regulating cell cycle progression. Cyclin E-cdk2 activity is required for progression from G1 to S phases; cyclin A-cdk2 activity is required for the S progression (20). We then examined by kinase assay whether cyclin A- and/or cyclin E-associated cdk2 activity was affected by hCaMKIIN
. As shown in Fig. 4C, cyclin A-cdk2 activity was dramatically decreased in LoVo cells after transfection with pKIIN
, pKIIN
1–68, and pKIIN
1–53, but not with pKIIN
1–41 or mock plasmid, but cyclin E-cdk2 activity was not affected. The down-regulation of cyclin A-cdk2 activity prompted us to evaluate the levels of several cyclin kinase inhibitors in LoVo cells after overexpression of hCaMKIIN
. We observed that hCaMKIIN
expression led to significant up-regulation of p27, but not p21 (Fig. 4C). No change was found in pKIIN
1–41-transfected cells, further confirming the key roles of 27CIR in hCaMKIIN
functions. On the other hand, down-regulation of hCaMKIIN
expression by siRNA in HT-29 cells decreased p27 expression (Fig. 4D). Moreover, we observed that cell growth was hardly affected by hCaMKIIN
overexpression in p27 siRNA (si-p27)-transfected LoVo cells (Fig. 4E), further confirming the key role of p27 in hCaMKIIN
-mediated inhibition of cell growth. Taken together, our findings suggest that hCaMKIIN
-mediated CaMKII inhibition, through its 27CIR, causes the up-regulation of p27 expression, resulting in the arrest of S phase progression.
hCaMKIIN
-induced p27 Accumulation Is Attributed to the Repressed Proteasomal Degradation, but Not Transcriptional Enhancement, of p27—We then investigated the possible mechanisms that contributed to hCaMKIIN
-induced p27 up-regulation: transcription or degradation regulation. Both the p27 promoter activity and the basal p27 transcript were barely changed in hCaMKIIN
-transfected LoVo cells (Fig. 5A). However, treatment of MG132, a specific proteasome inhibitor, fully reversed the down-regulation of endogenous p27 (Fig. 5B) and exogenously expressed FLAG-tagged p27 protein (Fig. 5C) induced by si-KIIN
in HT-29 cells. Besides, in LoVo cells treated with cycloheximide (a ribosomal complex inhibitor, to inhibit protein synthesis), p27 level decreased gradually as time passed; whereas hCaMKIIN
overexpression inhibited the reduction of p27 protein (Fig. 5D). In the constitutively active form of CaMKII (H282R)-transfected LoVo cells, decreased p27 expression was also observed (data not shown). Together, the data show that hCaMKIIN
-mediated CaMKII inhibition suppresses the proteasome-mediated degradation, resulting in the stabilization and therefore the accumulation of p27.
|
/CaMKII Signaling—Because only phosphorylated p27 on Thr-187 can be recognized and bound by ubiquitin protein ligase for consequent ubiquitation and degradation (21), we therefore tested whether p27 phosphorylation was affected by hCaMKIIN
. The results showed that phosphorylation on p27(T187) was decreased in LoVo cells transfected with pKIIN
, pKIIN
1–68, and pKIIN
1–53, but not pKIIN
1–41 or mock control (Fig. 6A), and the expression of a Thr-187 mutant, T187A p27, was not affected by hCaMKIIN
overexpression (data not shown), suggesting that p27(T187) phosphorylation accounting for its degradation may be decreased by hCaMKIIN
-mediated inhibition of CaMKII activity, and that CaMKII may promote p27 phosphorylation directly or indirectly. However, in vitro kinase assays showed that CaMKII could not directly phosphorylate p27 protein (data not shown). So, which of the one or more signal pathways are involved in the inhibition of p27 phosphorylation mediated by hCaMKIIN
-induced CaMKII inhibition? We considered first the MAPK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathways (22, 23). We found that the phosphorylation of MEK1 and ERK1/2, but not that of p38, JNK, or Akt, was decreased in LoVo cells after transfection with pKIIN
, pKIIN
1–68, and pKIIN
1–53 (Fig. 6A and data not shown). Further evaluation of time course of ERK1/2 activation and p27 phosphorylation on Thr-187 revealed that ERK1/2 dephosphorylation, first observed at 14-h post-transfection of pKIIN
, was an event earlier than p27 dephosphorylation, which occurred at 16 h and became more significant at 24 h (Fig. 6B and supplemental Fig. S5).
|
and MAPK pathways converge upstream of MEK/ERK to regulate p27 phosphorylation, this leaves Raf-1 or MEK as possible targets for CaMKII and hCaMKIIN
regulation. We then examined whether Raf-1 and MEK1 activities were affected by hCaMKIIN
overexpression. The result showed that hCaMKIIN
induced a significant decrease in the MEK1 activity, but not Raf-1 activity, as compared with mock-transfection (Fig. 6C), demonstrating that hCaMKIIN
regulates MAPK signaling at the level of MEK1. Besides, U0126 (MEK1 inhibitor) treatment nearly completely abrogated the increased phosphorylation of endogenous ERK1/2 and p27(T187) in HT-29 cells transfected with si-KIIN
(Fig. 6D). Collectively, the data indicate that the deactivation of MEK/ERK signaling by hCaMKIIN
may be responsible for the inhibition of p27 phosphorylation and thereafter degradation, which primarily regulates the cell cycle progression of tumor cells. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and using human colon adenocarcinoma cells as tumor model, we demonstrate that the effective suppression of LoVo cell growth by hCaMKIIN
is due to a dramatic inhibition of cell-cycle progression with features of an S-phase arrest. In this case, hCaMKIIN
caused deactivation of the kinase activity of MEK/ERK and the accumulation of p27 protein, which primarily regulates the cell cycle progression of LoVo cells. This is the first report on mechanistic details underlying how endogenous CaMKII inhibitor-mediated CaMKII inhibition arrests cell cycle in tumor cells.
We have demonstrated that the target of hCaMKIIN
-mediated CaMKII inhibition is more like to be p27. As we all know, p27 can bind to cyclin A/Cdk2 and cyclin E/Cdk2 and inhibit its activity. Cyclin E-cdk2 activity is required for progression from G1 to S phases, and cyclin A-cdk2 activity is required for the S progression (20). In our study, the inhibition of cyclin A/Cdk2 activity but not cyclin E/Cdk2 activity was observed. We also oberved the decrease of cyclin A protein level by hCaMKIIN
overexpression, but the level of cyclin E remained unchanged.4 Although cyclin E levels decrease rapidly once S phase is initiated in normally growing cells (24), previous studies show that inhibition of Cdk2 activity leads to cyclin E stabilization by inhibiting autophosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitin-dependent degradation of cyclin E (25). Thus, the unaltered expression of cyclin E in LoVo cells overexpressing hCaMKIIN
might also reflect the inhibition of Cdk2 activity in late G1 phase.
|
, we wonder whether p27 may act as physiological substrate of CaMKII. However, in vitro kinase assay showed that CaMKII could not directly phosphorylate p27 protein (data not shown). Sequence analysis also showed that CaMKII phosphorylation motifs were not present in the sequences of p27 protein. The results suggest that hCaMKIIN
may affect p27 expression indirectly via other target signaling molecule(s). First we considered the signaling molecules that account for associated properties of p27 in negative regulation of cell-cycle progression, such as MAPK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathways (22, 23). We found that the hCaMKIIN
-mediated deactivation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2, but not that of p38, JNK or Akt, is prerequisite to the inhibition of phosphorylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation of p27 (Fig. 6). Although previous studies showed that CaMKII could activate Ras/Raf-1/MAPK pathway by binding to and activating Raf-1 (26, 27), the Raf-1 activity was not affected by hCaMKIIN
(Fig. 6C), suggesting that Raf-1 might not be a direct target of hCaMKIIN
effect. However, MEK kinases other than Raf-1 may be involved in the interaction with CaMKII (28). Nevertheless, we are the first to report the hCaMKIIN
-induced deactivation of MEK/ERK activity leads to p27 modulation and cell cycle regulation. We are now working on the potential phosphorylation of p27 and the exact phosphorylation site(s) of p27 by MEK/ERK.
Most of the known genetic mechanisms correlated with the tumor progression involve the loss of growth inhibitory functions of wild-type suppressor genes, leading to unregulated or malignant growth. A number of biological consequences with clinical relevance arise from the MAPK mis-regulation. Of particular interest here are the absence of hCaMKIIN
in poorly differentiated tumors and its inhibition of human colon carcinoma growth as a candidate tumor suppressor. Besides, p27 has long been evaluated as negatively correlated with advanced tumor stage and short survival of patients with colon cancers (29, 30). In addition, constitutive activation of MEK1/2 has been found in tumorigenesis. We observed a negative correlation of hCaMKIIN
expression with p27 in several colon cancer cell lines (supplemental Fig. S6), and our preliminary results showed that, in some of the matched normal and tumor samples, p27 expression is positively correlated with hCaMKIIN
expression.4 Moreover, the low expression of hCaMKIIN
in colon adenocarcinoma was found to be negatively correlated with MEK/ERK activation status (p < 0.05).4 Thus, the likelihood of a contributory role for hCaMKIIN
in the tumor development is further strengthened by its involvement in the induction of p27 accumulation, and subsequent cell cycle interference. These data led us to hypothesis that the deregulation of hCaMKIIN
in colon adenocarcinoma tissues could be impairing a potential critical step to cell cycle progression, thereby favoring tumor cell development and growth. So, we speculate that amplifying hCaMKIIN
-mediated CaMKII inhibition may provide a promising approach for the drug design of cancer therapeutics.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1–S6. ![]()
1 Both authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of Immunology and National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China. Tel.: 86 21 55620605; Fax: 86 21 6538 2502; E-mail: caoxt{at}public3.sta.net.cn.
3 The abbreviations used are: CaM, calmodulin; CaMKII, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; hCaMKIIN
, human calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor alpha; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; siRNA, small interference RNA; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase. ![]()
4 C. Wang, N. Li, X. Liu, Y. Zheng, and X. Cao, unpublished data. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Li, C. Wang, Y. Wu, X. Liu, and X. Cao Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent Protein Kinase II Promotes Cell Cycle Progression by Directly Activating MEK1 and Subsequently Modulating p27 Phosphorylation J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2009; 284(5): 3021 - 3027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |