|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 17, 11714-11720, April 25, 2008
Artificial Laminin Polymers Assembled in Acidic pH Mimic Basement Membrane Organization*
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 LG4-5 shows that acidification renders the distal end in the long arms exclusively positive, precluding homophylic interactions between them. Therefore, acidification reproduces in vitro, and at a physiological protein concentration, what receptor interaction does in the cellular context, namely, it prevents the long arm from disturbing formation of the homogeneous matrix involving the short arms only. We propose that acid-induced polymers are the best tool to study cellular response to laminin in the future. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because laminin has an important role in determining cell fate, it is of major scientific and biotechnological interest to produce artificial laminin matrices that can mimic the polymers produced by cells in vivo. Artificial self-polymerization of laminin has been obtained in vitro either by maintaining the protein above a critical concentration (8) or by providing a surface of negative lipids to assist polymerization (9). More recently, we have found that diluting laminin in acidic pH led to instantaneous solution polymerization, whereas such polymers adsorbed on coverslips could induce neuritogenesis and cell migration out of explants of newborn rat brains (10, 11). When such explants were platted onto laminin adsorbed in neutral pH, laminin in EDTA, or poly-lysine, there was absolutely no migration or axonal growth. Immunolabeling of the matrices produced at each pH with anti-laminin antibodies revealed major morphological differences between them, whereas the acidic one seemed more flat and organized, which could account for its particular signaling properties to neural cells (11).
Although the molecular organization of the flat laminin mesh in basement membranes seems to be stable, there is plenty of evidence supporting the notion that the supramolecular organization of laminin can change throughout development and among tissues. In the nervous system, for instance, it has been demonstrated that laminin goes from cell-associated to scattered extracellular matrix deposits or from a punctated pattern to small or large sheet-like aggregates in developing brain (4, 12). Cells in culture can also assemble different networks as demonstrated for midbrain and cortical neural cells (13, 14) or Schwann cells (15). In addition, we have previously described that the laminin matrix synthesized by embryonic astrocytes (which efficiently supports neurite outgrowth) resembles the artificial matrix assembled upon laminin acidification because it is flat, organized, and closely associated to the cell surface (14).
Here we investigated at the molecular level the structural properties of acidic laminin polymers obtained in vitro at low protein concentration (10-50 µg/ml). We evaluated their ultrastructure and stability toward laminin fragments and concluded that such polymers are sheet-like matrices formed by interactions among the terminal ends of the short arms, whereas the long ones are left free at an orthogonal plane. Such polymers better correspond to the natural matrices characterized so far and should be considered as a model of artificial laminin substrate in further cell biology studies, as well as in possible therapeutic usage of the protein.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electron Microscopy—Laminin was diluted to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.0, containing 1 mM CaCl2. For freeze etching method the solution was pipetted on a Balzers support disk, rapidly frozen by impact against a copper block, cooled by liquid nitrogen to -196 °C, fractured, and etched for 20 min by raising the temperature to -100 °C. After this, the specimens were rotary-shadowed with platinum at 15 °C and further coated with carbon at 90 °C, digested in sodium hypochlorite (NaClO3) for 30 min, and collected on 200-mesh copper grids. For negative staining 5 µl of the laminin solution (50 µg/ml) was deposited on a Formvar-coated copper grid. The solution was partially removed with a filter paper, and 5 µl of uranyl acetate (2%) was added. After 1 min, the solution was completely dried with a filter paper. The specimens were examined in a Zeiss EM 900 transmission electron microscope operated at 80 kV.
Atomic Force Microscopy—Laminin was diluted to 50 µg/ml in acetate buffer and pipetted onto the surface of a newly cleaved mica, fixed for 2 h with 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodyate buffer (pH 7.2) for 2 h, rinsed three times in acetate buffer, dehydrated through an ethanol series, and critical point dried (Balzers CPD 050). The samples were examined in a MFP-3D atomic force microscopy (Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA). The images were acquired in air using intermittent contact mode. Cantilever elastic constants were obtained by the thermal noise method. For intermittent contact mode, tetrahedral-shaped cantilevers (AC240TS, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; nominal spring constant 2 N/m) were used at a low scan rate (0.5 Hz). Phase images were acquired with 512 x 512 pixels of resolution, and image processing was performed in IGOR-PRO (Wavemetrics, Portland, OR) using a MFP-3D template developed by Asylum Research.
Light Scattering Measurements—Light Scattering was measured in a QuantaMaster spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology International, Lawrenceville, NJ) at 37 °C. The wavelength of the incident light was fixed at 400 nm, and scattered light was colleted at 90 °C between 350 and 450 nm. Laminin self-polymerization was initiated by diluting the protein from a stock solution either to a final concentration of 10 µg/ml in 20 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.0) or to a final concentration of 200 µg/ml in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), both containing 1 mM CaCl2 (final volume, 800 µl). The fluorescence cuvette was previously treated with Repel Silane to avoid protein binding to the quartz walls. The assay was performed in the presence or in the absence of the laminin E1' or E3 fragments. Laminin stock solutions (
1 mg/ml) were kept at 4 °C until dilution into assay medium previously warmed to 37 °C in the sample compartment of the instrument. Under these conditions, i.e. at 4 °C, aggregates are not expected to form in stock solutions until the exact time when dilution in prewarmed buffer takes place (8). After laminin addition, the samples were gently mixed, and measurements were taken within
1 min. The data were corrected by subtracting appropriate blanks containing buffer only.
Immunostaining—Laminin matrices were obtained by diluting the stock solution to 50 µg/ml in prewarmed (37 °C) 0.1 M either acetate (pH 4.0) or Tris (pH 7.0) buffers with 1 mM CaCl2. One hundred microliters of the diluted solutions were dropped onto glass coverslips and incubated for 12 h at room temperature. For immunostaining, coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 min and rinsed three times with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).5 The matrices were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min and subsequently incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-laminin antibody diluted in blocking solution. The matrices were then washed three times with PBS and incubated with anti-rabbit, Cy3-conjugated antibody for 2 h, at room temperature. After being washed three times with PBS and once in water, the coverslips were mounted in N-propyl-gallate and visualized using a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioplan).
Electrostatic Surface Potential of the LG4-5 Domains of Laminins
1 and
2—The surface potential was calculated by using the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver software package (16), and images were generated using PyMol 0.97 (17). The atomic coordinates for laminin
-chains 1 and 2 were obtained from the Protein Data Bank entry 2JD4 for
1 and 1DYK for
2 (18, 19). The calculations were performed by assigning either a neutral or a positive charge for His residues. A probe sphere of 1.4 Å radius was used to generate the solvent-accessible surface. The dielectric constants used for protein and solvent were 20 and 80, respectively, and the system temperature was set to 310 K.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We next analyzed the ultrastructure of the acidic polymers by negative staining. Observation of Fig. 1B reveals a very organized mesh-like array, composed of polygons of an approximate hexagonal shape. Given the three-dimensional nature of the polymeric matrix, the superposed struts, instead of excluding the dye, actually worked as substrates for the uranyl because it percolated down through the mesh. This resulted in the protein appearing as the stained structure (white in the contrast reversed electron micrograph). The sides of the hexagons corresponding to the struts of the mesh were quantitatively analyzed by measuring 100 struts randomly chosen. The average size found was 21 ± 5 nm, which approximately corresponds to the size of laminin short arm, similarly to previously described for natural and heat-gelled laminin matrices (7, 20). Together freeze etching and negative staining indicate that acid-induced polymers are planar and present a repetitive structure compatible with a model where all intermolecular interactions are restricted to the single plane defined by the short arms.
Analysis of Acidic Laminin Matrices by Atomic Force Microscopy—Acid-induced laminin polymers were further evaluated by atomic force microscopy. The initial analysis of a squared window of 0.25 µm2 using conventional topography scanning showed a regular but poorly contrasted image, indicative of a flat surface (Fig. 2A). A second image was generated by analyzing the phase delay undergone by the cantilever (Fig. 2C). Phase imaging is extremely sensitive to the elastic and adhesive properties of the specimens present on the surface (21), leading to a pronounced increase in contrast. A homogenous image containing polygons similar to those found in electron microscopy was seen using phase mode. Because laminin is much more adhesive and elastic than the mica substrate, the delay in phase amplified the subtle changes in heights probed by the topographic image (Fig. 2, compare A and C).
To gain information on the height of the laminin layer, we have intentionally searched for random interruptions of the matrix in which the cantilever could be introduced to probe the distance to the underlying surface. Three of such regions were analyzed, providing an average depth of 86 ± 3 nm. This corresponds to the size of the laminin long arm, which therefore would not participate in the hexagonal mesh but instead would be projected to an orthogonal plane relative to it.
Effect of Laminin Fragments on Laminin Polymerization in Solution—To confirm the lack of contribution of the long arm to the formation of the acid-induced laminin network, we have investigated whether addition of the E3 fragment, which contains the distal two domains of the long arm, would interfere with laminin polymerization in solution. The experiment was carried out at 10 µg/ml, a concentration at which no polymerization is observed at neutral pH (8). Polymerization was monitored as the increase in light scattering in solution at 400 nm. Fig. 3A shows the intensities of light scattering obtained upon laminin dilution in acidic pH in the absence or in the presence of a 20-fold molar excess of the fragments. In the presence of fragment E1', which contains the globular distal ends of two short arms, polymerization was blocked. On the other hand, the addition of fragment E3 did not affect solution polymerization, which confirms that interactions with the long arm are not involved in the acidic polymers.
|
|
Effect of Laminin Fragments on Laminin Matrices Deposited on Coverslip—Although laminin aggregates could not be detected in neutral pH at 50 µg/ml, we have previously demonstrated that deposits of the aggregated protein became visible when the laminin solution was incubated over the surface of a glass coverslip (11, 14). Such deposits were characterized by immunostaining and shown to be morphologically different from others obtained in acidic pH. An analogous comparison between laminin aggregates obtained in distinct pHs could not be performed at the ultrastructural level because polymers obtained in neutral pH were visible as amorphous aggregates in electron microscopy, both using negative staining or freeze etching (data not shown). A visible network of laminin under neutral pH has only been reported at an extremely high protein concentration (3.5 mg/ml) (7).
Fragments E1' and E3 were tested for their ability of interfering with the formation of laminin matrices adsorbed on coverslips at each pH (Fig. 4). Laminin alone formed flat and organized polymers in acidic pH, whereas in neutral pH the polymers were bulky and discontinuous. Fragment E1' clearly disrupted both polymers, whereas E3 affected only the deposits obtained in neutral pH. It is interesting to note that although E3 clearly disrupts the large aggregates typical of laminin deposited in neutral pH, small aggregates remained on the matrix, which indicates that, although E3 interferes with the final polymerized state, it still preserved some level of protein aggregation.
Comparison between the Electrostatic Surface Potentials of the LG4-5 Domains of Laminin at Neutral and Acidic pH—We finally asked the question about why acidic buffer would stabilize sheet-like polymers. A recent paper has described the crystallographic structure of LG4-5, the two most distal domains in the long arm of laminin
1. We have used the PyMol software to analyze the electrostatic surface of the protein at pHs 7 and 4. Fig. 5 shows that in neutral pH negatively charged groups (red) are clustered in a predominantly positive (blue) surface. This would allow for some degree of electrostatic interaction between two of these domains. Indeed, a significant proportion of dimers formed by the association between the distal ends of two long arms have been observed among spontaneously formed laminin dimers detected using rotatory shadowing (8). On the other hand, when the pH is decreased to 4, the surface becomes totally positive, which would completely prevent interactions between the two distal ends of the long arm of laminin 111. Interestingly, this would not be the case for laminin 211, where the long arm is contributed by the
2 chain. In this case, alternated negatively and positively charged clusters are seen in both neutral and acidic pH (Fig. 5). Accordingly, acidification of pH produced only a modest increase in the light scattering of laminin 211 (not shown).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The fact that laminin could self-polymerize in a cell-free system opened the possibility of using artificial polymers as substrates to study the cellular response to the underlying matrix. In this context, it has been assumed that the artificial polymers described back in 1985 properly corresponded to the polymers produced by cells in vivo. Natural polymers, however, had been morphologically characterized, whereas the structure of the polymers produced by in vitro self-polymerization was not available for comparison. Moreover, rotatory shadowing studies had shown that the distal ends of the long arms interacted with each other, whereas such interaction did not occur in the natural laminin mesh. Here we showed that laminin polymerized in acidic buffer in a concentration as low as 60 nM (50 µg/ml) produced a continuous polygonal network, contributed only by the short arms. We also showed that upon acidification the interaction between the distal ends of the long arms is hampered, given that the surface charge of the LG4-5 domains becomes completely positive. Our interpretation is that acidification impairs bridging of two long arms, stabilizing the interaction among short arms only. An equivalent blockage of the long arm is not necessary in a natural situation when the laminin molecule binds to a cell receptor that recognizes its distal end such as
3β1,
6β1, and
7β1 integrins, dystroglycan, or sulfatides. In this case, the interaction with the receptor will occupy the long arm and impair it from participating in the laminin polymer. On the other hand, in neutral solution, the long arms would be free to interact with each other and would disturb the formation of the homogeneous polymer involving the three short arms only.
In this work, we used several direct and indirect methodological tools to demonstrate that acid-induced laminin polymers are structurally similar to natural polymers produced in vivo by cells. Negative staining and freeze etching followed by electron microscopy or by atomic force microscopy showed a clear correspondence between the morphology of matrices produced by Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm and mouse embryonic carcinoma cell tumors and acid-induced ones. Additionally, the use of laminin fragments confirmed that, in the acid-induced polymer, as in the natural one, fragment E3 does not interfere with polymerization neither in solution nor in large aggregates used for cell cultivation. Curiously, the data reported here using light scattering measurements revealed that E3 partially disassembles polymers formed in neutral pH at high protein concentration. Moreover, the presence of E3 led to the disruption of the very large aggregates observed in the matrices adsorbed in neutral pH (Fig. 4). These results taken as a whole point to the interpretation that the interactions between the distal ends of the long arms that seem to occur in neutral buffer actually work as bridges, cross-linking small stretches of the sheet-like polygonal polymer. Such interactions would impair the formation of a continuous mesh that can be distinguished from smaller polymers by the light scattering technique, which can discriminate between protein aggregates of different sizes.
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental figures. ![]()
1 Recipient of a Ph. D. fellowship from Consaelho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. ![]()
2 Present address: Faculdade de Tecnologia e Ciências, Ave. Luís Viana Filho 8812, Salvador, BA 41741-590, Brazil. ![]()
3 Present address: Laboratory of Protozoology, Federal University of Pará, Belém, PA 66055-240, Brazil. ![]()
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 5521-2562-6476; Fax: 5521-2562-6483; E-mail: tcsampaio{at}histo.ufrj.br.
5 The abbreviation used is: PBS, phosphate-buffered saline. ![]()
6 Patent submitted to the Brazilian National Institute for Industrial Patent. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |