|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 17, 11794-11806, April 25, 2008
Protein Kinase C-
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or -
, but not PKC-
or -
, blocked S1P-induced migration. Although S1P activated both PLD1 and PLD2, S1P-induced migration was attenuated by knocking down PLD2 or expressing dnPLD2 but not PLD1. Blocking PKC-
, but not PKC-
, activity attenuated S1P-mediated PLD stimulation, demonstrating that PKC-
, but not PKC-
, was upstream of PLD. Transfection of HPAECs with dnRac1 or Rac1 siRNA attenuated S1P-induced migration. Furthermore, transfection with PLD2 siRNA, infection of HPAECs with dnPKC-
, or treatment with myristoylated PKC-
peptide inhibitor abrogated S1P-induced Rac1 activation. These results establish that S1P signals through S1P1 and Gi to activate PKC-
and, subsequently, a PLD2-PKC-
-Rac1 cascade. Activation of this pathway is necessary to stimulate the migration of lung endothelial cells, a key component of the angiogenic process. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the vasculature, S1P is a key regulator of vascular maturation and angiogenesis under physiological and pathological conditions. Angiogenesis, or new blood vessel formation, is critical for normal embryonic vascular development and in tumor metastasis. Although targeted deletion of S1P2 or S1P3 in mice has no adverse effect on embryogenesis, deletion of S1P1 caused failure of vascular development leading to a massive hemorrhage and embryonic lethality between E12.5 and E14.5 (24). Endothelial cell (EC) migration is an essential component of angiogenesis that is regulated by growth factors, bioactive molecules, and intracellular signaling (25). Among the various agonists, S1P has emerged as a potent angiogenic, and vascular maturation factor and considerable evidence exists for S1P-induced endothelial cell proliferation (4), migration (26-28), chemotaxis (29), and endothelial cell remodeling (30). Based on a number of studies using inhibitors, siRNA, dn mutants, or genetically engineered mice, it is becoming evident that several signaling pathways including Rho/Rac, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Akt, MAPKs, PKC, and changes in intracellular Ca2+ are involved in S1P-induced EC migration (3, 7, 8, 12, 31). We recently demonstrated that PLD activation by S1P regulates ERK1/2 activation (31) and interleukin-8 secretion in human bronchial epithelial cells (22, 32). Furthermore, involvement of lipid phosphate phosphatase-1 in regulating lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-induced phosphatidate (PA) generation and fibroblast migration suggests a role for PLD2 in fibroblast migration, wound healing, and tumor metastasis (33).
PA is a bioactive lipid, and its generation by PLD activation represents an important signaling cascade involved in the regulation of cellular responses including proliferation (34) and cytoskeletal reorganization (35). PA also serves as an immediate precursor of LPA or diacylglycerol, which is an endogenous activator of several PKC isoforms (36). PA itself stimulates the PKC-
isoform (37, 38), phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (39-41), phospholipase C-
(42, 43), and sphingosine kinase-1 (44), and it inhibits protein phosphatase-1 (45).
In ECs, very little is known regarding the role of S1P-induced PLD activation and generation of PA in cell migration, wound healing, and angiogenesis. Therefore, in the present study we investigated the role of S1P on human pulmonary artery endothelial cell (HPAEC) and established how the activation of the PKC isoform(s) is involved in upstream and downstream signaling of PLD1 and/or PLD2 in relation to the stimulation of cell migration. Our results show that physiologically relevant concentrations of S1P markedly stimulated HPAEC migration, which was sensitive to pertussis toxin (PTx) and a S1P1 antagonist. Furthermore, evidence is provided for the role of PKC-
, but not PKC-
, in S1P-induced PLD activation and the PLD2-mediated stimulation of PKC-
, Rac1, and cell migration.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
peptide inhibitor was purchased from BIOMOL Research Labs Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Anti-PKC-
antibody, PKC-
peptide inhibitor, scrambled siRNA, and target siRNA for PLD1, PLD2, and Rac1 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-S1P1 antibody was obtained from Affinity BioReagents (Golden, CO), anti-S1P2, anti-S1P3, anti-S1P4, and anti-S1P5 antibodies were purchased from Exalpha Biological Inc. (Maynard, MA), anti-PKC
and anti-PKC-
antibodies were from BD Transduction Laboratories, and anti-Rac1 antibody was from BD Biosciences Pharmingen. Anti-PKC
and anti-phospho-PKC-
(Ser-729) antibodies were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology; anti-phospho-PKC-
/
(Thr-410/403) was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Danvers, MA). Anti-phosphoserine antibody was from Zymed Laboratories Inc. (San Francisco, CA). Internal and N-terminal antibodies for PLD1 and PLD2 were purchased from BIOSOURCE International Inc. (Camarillo, CA), and anti-PLD2 antibody was kindly provided by Dr. Sylvain Bourgoin (Quebec, PQ, Canada). Anti-β-actin antibody was from Sigma. S1P1 siRNA was from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). Rac1 activation assay kit was obtained from Upstate (Temecula, CA). Lysis buffer was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Danvers, MA). Protease inhibitor mixture tablets (EDTA-free Complete) were from Roche Diagnostics. Aprotinin and phosphatase inhibitor mixture 1 were from Sigma-Aldrich. Ad5CA dominant negative (dn)-PKC-
, dnPKC-
, dnPKC-
, dnPKC-
, and dnPKC
were kindly provided by Dr. Motoi Ohba from Institute of Molecular Oncology (Showa University, Japan). Cell Culture—HPAECs (passage number 3) were purchased from Cambrex Inc. (Walkersville, MD) and cultured in complete endothelial growth medium (EGM)-2 medium (46). The cells (passage number 5-8) in 35- or 100-mm dishes or glass coverslips were used for all the experiments.
Endothelial Cell Migration—HPAEC were cultured in 12- or 6-well plates to
95% confluence and then starved in the serum-free EGM-2 medium for 1-3 h or in EBM-2 medium containing 0.1% FBS for 18-24 h. The cell monolayer was wounded by scratching across the monolayer with a 10-µl standard sterile pipette tip. The scratched monolayer was rinsed twice with serum-free medium to remove cell debris and incubated with varying concentrations of S1P. The area (
1 cm2 total) in a scratched area was recorded at 0 and 16-24 h using a Hamamatsu digital camera connected to the Nikon Eclipse TE2000-S microscope with x10 objective and MetaVue software (Universal Imaging Corp.). Images were analyzed by the Image J software. The effect of S1P and other agents on cell migration/wound healing was quantified by calculating the percentage of the free area not occupied by cells compared with an area of the initial wound that was defined as closure of wounded area.
Electrical Cell Substrate Impedance Sensing (ECIS) Assay—HPAEC were cultured in 8-well ECIS electrode arrays (8W1E, Applied Biophysics, NY) to
95% confluence and starved in the serum-free EBM-2 medium for 1-3 h. An elevated field (3 V at 40,000 Hz for 10 s) was applied to wound the cells on the electrode. Either complete medium or medium containing S1P (100-1000 nM) was added, and wound healing was monitored for 10-20 h by measuring the transendothelial electrical resistance using the ECIS equipment (11, 47). In all experiments S1P was complexed with 0.1% BSA.
|
80% confluence in 6-well plates or 60- or 100-mm dishes. After 24 h, the virus-containing medium was replaced with complete EGM-2 medium. Vector control or infected cells were subjected to scratch and wound-healing ECIS assays, and immunoprecipitates or cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting. Measurement of PLD Activation by S1P—HPAECs in 35-mm dishes were labeled with [32P]orthophosphate (5 µCi/ml) in phosphate-free DMEM for 18-24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 and 95% air. Cells were then challenged with EBM-2 medium alone or EBM-2 containing S1P plus 0.1% BSA in the presence of 0.1% 1-butanol (22, 32). In some experiments incubations were also carried out in the presence of 0.1% 3-butanol that served as additional controls. Incubations were terminated by the addition of 1 ml of methanol:HCl (100:1 v/v), cells were scraped into glass tubes, and lipids were extracted by the addition of 1 ml of methanol:HCl (100:1 v/v), 2 ml of chloroform, and 0.8 ml of 1 N HCl. [32P]Phosphatidylbutanol (PBt), formed as a result of PLD activation and transphosphatidylation of [32P]PA to 1-butanol, but not butan-3-ol, was separated from the total lipid extract by thin layer chromatography on 1% potassium oxalate plates with the upper phase of ethyl acetate:2,2,4-trimethyl pentane:glacial acetic acid:water (65:10:15:50 v/v) as the developing solvent system (22, 32). Unlabeled PBt was added as carrier during separation of labeled lipids that were visualized by exposure to iodine vapor. Radioactivity associated with PBt was quantified by liquid scintillation counting, and all values were normalized to 106 dpm in total lipid extract. [32P]PBt formed in control and S1P-challenged samples was expressed as dpm/dish or percent control.
Measurement of PKC-
and PKC-
Activation—HPAECs were cultured in 100-mm dishes to
95% confluence, starved in EBM-2 medium containing 0.1% FBS for 3 h, stimulated with S1P for 5-10 min, washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM vanadate, and lysed with 500 µl of lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and protease inhibitors from EDTA-free Complete tablets (Roche Applied Science). Cells were subsequently sonicated twice for 15 s and then centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 15 min. Supernatants were collected and incubated overnight with polyclonal anti-PKC-
or anti-PKC-
antibody at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitates were washed 3 times with lysis buffer and 2 times with kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 25 mM β-glycerophosphate, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and resuspended in 100 µl of kinase buffer. The activity of PKC was measured in 100 µl of kinase buffer containing 25 µg of myelin basic protein as an exogenous substrate to which 10 µM ATP, 2 µg of dioleoylglycerol, 12 µg of phosphatidylserine, and 20-40 µl of immunoprecipitate were added. Incubations were carried out for 10 min at 30 °C and terminated by the addition of 20 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. Samples were then boiled for 5 min and analyzed for phosphorylation of myelin basic protein by Western blotting with anti-phosphoserine antibody.
Rac1 Activation Assay—HPAECs were cultured in 100-mm dishes to
50% confluence for siRNA transfection or to
95% confluence for adenoviral infection or inhibitor treatment. Cells were starved in EBM-2 medium containing 0.1% FBS for 3 h before stimulation with S1P for 2-15 min, cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with PAK-1 PBD, and Rac1 activation was evaluated using the Rac1 Activation assay kit as per the manufacturer's instruction (Upstate).
|
95% confluence and starved for 3 h in EBM-2 medium containing 0.1% FBS. Cells were stimulated with S1P (100-1000 nM) for 5-60 min, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed with 100-300 µl of lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and protease inhibitors from EDTA-free Complete tablets (Roche Applied Science). Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min and boiled with the Laemmli sample buffer for 5 min. Cell lysates (20-30 µg protein) were separated on 10% or 4-20% SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and blocked in TBST containing 5% BSA before incubation with primary antibody (1:1000 dilution) overnight. After blocking, washing, and incubation with appropriate secondary antibody, blots were developed using an ECL chemiluminescence kit. Western blots were scanned by densitometry, and integrated density of pixels in identified areas was quantified using Image-Quant Version 5.2 software (GE Healthcare). Immunofluorescence Microscopy—HPAECs grown on coverslips (18 mm) or chamber slides were starved for 3 h in EBM-2 containing 0.1% FBS before treatment with S1P (100-1000 nM) for 5-60 min. Cells were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 10 min, washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline, permeabilized with methanol for 4 min at -20 °C, blocked with 2% BSA in TBST, incubated for 1 h with appropriate primary antibody (1:200 dilution), washed with TBST, and stained for 1 h with secondary antibody (1:200 dilution) in TBST containing 2% BSA. Cells were examined using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-S immunofluorescence microscope and a Hamamatsu digital camera with x60 oil immersion objective and Meta Vue software.
RNA Isolation and Real Time RT-PCR—Total RNA was isolated from HPAECs grown on 35-mm dishes using TRIzol® reagent according to the manufacturer's instruction. iQ SYBR Green Supermix was used to do the real time measurements using iCycler by Bio-Rad. 18 S (sense, 5'-GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3', and antisense, 5'-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG-3') was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize expression. The reaction mixture consisted of 0.3 µg of total RNA (target gene) or 0.03 µg of total RNA (18 S rRNA), 12.5 µl of iQ SYBR Green, 2 µl of cDNA, 1.5 µM target primers, or 1 µM 18 S rRNA primers in a total volume of 25 µl. For all samples reverse transcription was carried out at 25 °C for 5 min followed by cycling to 42 °C for 30 min and 85 °C for 5 min with iScript cDNA synthesis kit. Amplicon expression in each sample was normalized to its 18 S rRNA content. The relative abundance of target mRNA in each sample was calculated as 2 raised to the negative of its threshold cycle value times 106 after being normalized to the abundance of its corresponding 18 S rRNA (housekeeping gene) (2-(primer threshold cycle)2-(18 S threshold cycle) x 106). All primers were designed by inspection of the genes of interest using Primer 3 software. Negative controls consisting of reaction mixtures containing all components except target RNA were included with each of the RT-PCR runs. To verify that amplified products were derived from mRNA and did not represent genomic DNA contamination, representative PCR mixtures for each gene were run in the absence of the RT enzyme after first being cycled to 95 °C for 15 min. In the absence of reverse transcription, no PCR products were observed.
|
|
50% confluence in 6-well plates or chamber slides were transfected with Gene Silencer® (Gene Therapy System, Inc. San Diego, CA)-transfecting agent containing scrambled siRNA (50-100 nM) or siRNA for target proteins (50-100 nM) in serum-free EBM-2 medium according to the manufacturer's recommendation. To optimize conditions for efficient transfection, HPAECs were transfected with Fl-Luciferase GL2 Duplex siRNA (target sequence. 5'-CGTACGCGGAATACTTCGA-3', Dharmacon) as a positive control. After 3 h of transfection, 1 ml of fresh complete EGM-2 medium containing 10% FBS was added, and cells were cultured for additional 72 h and analyzed for mRNA levels by real time PCR or protein expression by Western blotting. Scrambled siRNA control or siRNA-transfected cells were subjected to scratch or wound healing experiments as described earlier. Statistical Analysis—Analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keul's test were used to compare the means of two or more different treatment groups. The level of significance was set to p < 0.05 unless otherwise stated. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% of the wounded area remaining free of cells after exposure to S1P (10 nM) for 16 h as compared with
25% with 100 nM S1P (supplemental Fig. 1, A-D). Our results on S1P-induced cell migration are in agreement with a previous report (26). In contrast, LPA and ceramide 1-phosphate did not stimulate cell migration significantly in HPAECs, and this finding differs from an earlier report on LPA-induced migration of bovine aortic and human umbilical vein ECs (27).
|
To obtain evidence that S1P1 is involved in S1P-induced cell migration and wound healing, we tested the ability of SB649146, which reduces constitutively active S1P1 and blocks S1P binding (48), on S1P-mediated cell motility. Pretreatment of HPAECs with SB649146 (10 µM) for 1 h reduced S1P-induced migration (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, SB649146 decreased the basal migration of cells in the absence of added S1P (Fig. 2A). A similar effect of SB649146 on S1P-induced EC migration was observed in ECIS wound healing assay (Fig. 2B).
To further characterize the role of S1P1 in S1P-mediated cell migration, HPAECs were transfected with S1P1 siRNA (100 nM) for 72 h, cells were wounded and challenged with S1P (1 µM) for 16 h, and migration was evaluated. S1P1 siRNA effectively down-regulated mRNA expression of S1P1, but not S1P4, and protein expression of S1P1 (
60%) (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, the S1P-induced migration of HPAECs was almost completely attenuated by knockdown of S1P1 (Fig. 2D). These combined results establish the role for S1P1 in regulating S1P-induced cell migration in HPAECs.
Involvement of PKC-
and PKC-
in S1P-induced HPAEC Migration—It has been reported that PKC-
regulates the action of S1P on EC motility (49); however, the PKC isoform(s) involved in S1P-induced migration has not been well defined. Analysis of total cell lysates by Western blotting revealed that PKC-
,-
,-
, and -
are the predominant isoforms present in HPAECs (results not shown). To investigate which isoforms of PKC are activated by S1P, serum-deprived HPAECs were challenged with S1P (1 µM), and activation of PKC isoforms was determined by immunoprecipitating each PKC isoform separately and measuring the activity. Immunoprecipitates of PKC-
,-
, and -
, but not PKC-
, from S1P-challenged cells exhibited enhanced serine phosphorylation of myelin basic protein (Fig. 3). Next, we investigated the role of PKC-
,-
,-
, and -
isoforms in S1P-stimulated HPAEC migration by infecting cells with dominant negative isoforms of each PKC. Infection of HPAECs with adenoviral vectors encoding for dnPKC-
,-
,-
, and -
(5 m.o.i.) for 24 h resulted in overexpression of each protein (
5-fold) (results not shown). Overexpression of dnPKC-
, and -
isoforms (5 m.o.i.), but not PKC-
and -
isoforms, significantly reduced S1P-induced cell migration compared with vector-infected cells (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, the effect of dnPKC-
and -
overexpression on S1P-induced wound closure was dependent on multiplicity of infection with maximum inhibition observed at 10 m.o.i. (data not shown). The role of PKC-
and -
in cell migration was also tested using specific peptide inhibitors and is shown in Fig. 4B. Pretreatment of HPAECs with either PKC-
peptide inhibitor (10 µM) or myristoylated PKC-
peptide (10 µM) attenuated S1P-induced cell migration. These results establish that S1P-induced wound closure is dependent on activation of PKC-
and -
isoforms in HPAECs.
|
PLD2, but Not PLD1, Is Involved in S1P-induced HPAEC Migration—To further characterize the role of PLD1 and PLD2 in S1P-induced cell migration and wound healing, HPAECs were infected with the adenoviral constructs (10 m.o.i.) encoding catalytically inactive hPLD1-K898R and mPLD2-K758R mutants for 24 h before S1P challenge. Overexpression of mPLD2-K758R, but not hPLD1-K798R, attenuated S1P-induced cell migration and wound healing, as evidenced by scratch and ECIS assay (Fig. 5, A-D). The role of PLD2 in cell migration was further investigated by knocking down PLD2 expression with PLD2 siRNA. HPAECs were transfected with PLD2 siRNA (50 and 100 nM) for 48 h, and the efficacy of the siRNA was determined by real time RT-PCR for mRNA levels and Western blotting for protein. Transfection of HPAECs with siRNA for PLD2 specifically blocked the mRNA expression of PLD2 without affecting PLD1 expression (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, treatment with PLD2 siRNA (50 nM) for 48 h attenuated S1P-induced cell migration in the scratch assay as compared with cells transfected with scrambled siRNA (Fig. 6B). In parallel experiments, transfection of cells with PLD1 siRNA had no effect on S1P-induced migration (results not shown). These results demonstrate that PLD2, but not PLD1, regulates S1P-induced migration of HPAECs.
PKC-
, but Not PKC-
, Regulates S1P-induced PLD Activation—Having established a role for PKC-
and -
and PLD2 in S1P-induced migration, we further characterized the signaling cascades of PKC-
and -
in S1P-induced PLD activation using peptide inhibitors. HPAECs were incubated with PKC-
peptide inhibitor (10 µM, 2 h) or myristoylated PKC-
peptide (10 µM, 2 h). In parallel experiments, cells were labeled with [32P]orthophosphate overnight before stimulation with S1P for activation of PLD. Pretreatment of cells with either PKC-
peptide inhibitor or myristoylated PKC-
peptide attenuated translocation of the respective isoform to cell periphery as determined by immunofluorescence microscopy (supplemental Fig. 4, A and B). Additionally, as shown in supplemental Fig. 4, C and D, the S1P stimulation of [32P]PBt formation by treatment with S1P for 5 min was blocked by dnPKC-
and PKC-
peptide inhibitor but not by dnPKC-
and myristoylated PKC-
peptide. These results demonstrate that S1P activated PKC-
upstream of PLD and that PKC-
is downstream of PLD in HPAECs.
|
, but Not PKC-
, Activation in HPAECs—To further characterize the role of PLD2 in S1P-induced PKC-
activation, HPAECs grown on glass coverslips or 35-mm dishes were transfected with PLD2 siRNA (50 nM) for 72 h, and cells were challenged with S1P for 5 min. Activation of PKC-
and PKC-
was then determined by immunocytochemistry or Western blotting. S1P treatment stimulated translocation of PKC-
and PKC-
isoforms to the plasma membrane (Fig. 7, A and C), and activation of PKC-
and -
isoforms compared with control cells (Fig. 7, B and D). Similarly, knockdown of PLD2 with PLD2 siRNA blocked S1P-induced translocation and phosphorylation of PKC-
, but not PKC-
(Fig. 7, A-D). These results further establish that PLD regulates S1P-induced PKC-
, but not PKC-
, activation in HPAECs.
PLD2 Regulates S1P-induced HPAEC Migration via Rac1—Earlier studies demonstrated that Rac1 regulates S1P-induced EC migration (50); however, the role of PLD in Rac1 activation is largely unknown. Therefore, we characterized the link between PLD signaling and Rac1 activation in S1P-mediated HPAEC migration. S1P (1 µM) activated translocation of Rac1 to cell plasma membrane in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 8A). Activation of Rac1 by S1P was also verified by immunoprecipitation of Rac1-GTP with PAK-1 PBD. S1P increased the activation of Rac1 with a peak at 2 min after S1P challenge (Fig. 8B). To demonstrate a role for Rac1 in cell migration, HPAECs were infected with adenoviral dnRac1 (1-10 m.o.i.) for 48 h or transfected with Rac1 siRNA (50 nM) for 72 h. Although infection of HPAECs with the dnRac1 at varying multiplicities of infection for 24 h resulted in overexpression of the protein (Fig. 8C), knockdown of Rac1 with Rac1 siRNA down-regulated Rac1 expression by
85% (Fig. 8D). Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 8, C and D, dnRac1 or Rac1 siRNA significantly reduced S1P-induced closure of wound.
|
PKC-
Regulates S1P-induced Rac1 Activation—Having established a role for PLD2 in PKC
and Rac1 activation by S1P, we determined the role of PKC-
in Rac1 stimulation. HPAECs were pretreated with myristoylated PKC-
peptide (10 µM) for 2 h before S1P challenge. As shown in Fig. 10, A and B, myristoylated PKC-
peptide attenuated S1P-induced phosphorylation of PKC-
and S1P-mediated translocation of Rac1 to cell plasma membrane, respectively. These results demonstrate that PKC-
regulates S1P-induced Rac1 activation in HPAECs.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and -
isoforms in HPAECs, (ii) stimulation of PKC-
by S1P, but not PKC-
, activates PLD2, and (iii) activation of PLD2 by PKC-
through S1P in turn stimulates migration via PKC-
and Rac1. Furthermore, we observed that S1P1 is the predominant S1P receptor expressed in HPAECs, which is coupled to Gi in transducing signals from S1P to intracellular targets such as PLD.
S1P is a potent and pleotropic bioactive sphingolipid that mediates cellular responses such as proliferation, differentiation, tumor cell invasion, cell migration, and angiogenesis via G-protein-coupled S1P1-5 (7-9). Earlier studies showed that S1P regulates cell motility, and whether it is stimulatory or inhibitory depends upon the cell type and the expression of different S1P-receptors. Although S1P stimulates migration of ECs (26, 27), it inhibited chemotactic cell motility of several tumor cell lines (53, 54) and vascular smooth muscle cells (55, 56). S1P induces EC migration and angiogenesis in human umbilical vein (2) and bovine aortic ECs (26) that require the expression of S1P1 and S1P3 (2, 10, 12). The S1P-mediated migration of human umbilical vein ECs was sensitive to C3 exotoxin (10), and PTx (27, 28) and required activation of integrin
vβ3 via Rho, but not Rac (10). Furthermore, in one study PKC inhibitor showed no effect on S1P-induced migration of human umbilical vein ECs, but inhibition of phospholipase C abrogated the S1P response (57). Although vascular endothelial growth factor-stimulated migration and proliferation of ECs was dependent on the nitric oxide-mediated decrease in PKC-
activity (58), sustained PKC-
activation by lysophosphatidylcholine also inhibited syndecan-4-dependent assembly/disassembly of focal adhesions necessary for migration of bovine aortic ECs (59). In the present study we demonstrated a role for PKC-
and -
, but not -
and -
, isoforms in S1P-induced migration of HPAECs using overexpression of dnPKC isoforms and peptide inhibitors. Our results show that dnPKC-
and PKC-
peptide inhibitor, but not dnPKC-
or myristoylated PKC-
peptide, attenuated S1P-induced PLD activation in HPAECs. We observed some variation in the control levels of cell migration from
25% (Figs. 1 and 2A and 6B) to
50% (supplemental Figs. 2 and 4) when we used different batches of primary HPAECs. This variation can be attributed to differences in responses from individual donors. Nevertheless, our results consistently demonstrate distinct roles for PKC-
and -
in S1P-induced cell migration, and we show for the first time that S1P-mediated stimulation of PLD2 is regulated by PKC-
, whereas PKC-
activation is down-stream of PLD2.
|
|
and cell migration in HPAECs; however, the mechanism(s) of PLD/PA-dependent activation of PKC-
is yet to be defined. PKC-
is insensitive to diacylglycerol and Ca2+ (36, 63), but it can be activated by acidic lipids such as PA, phosphatidylinositol, and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (64). Although PA can physically bind to and activate PKC-
in vitro and in vivo (38, 39, 65), it is unclear if PKC-
has any domain structure for PA binding. It has been reported that Rac-associated type I phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase (PIP5K), but not type II PIP5K, is stimulated by PA (66). It is possible that stimulation of type I phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase by PA in cells results in enhanced phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate generation, which is phosphorylated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to form phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate. It is of interest that regulators of PLD1, namely RalA and Arf6 (67, 68), are implicated in cell migration. The formation of stress fibers is linked to migration, and PLD activity increases stress fiber formation (69). Thus, factors that regulate PLD activity and responses to PLD signals co-ordinate and support cell motility in a variety of normal and cancer cells. Interestingly, our results show Rac1 is part of signaling cascade involved in S1P-mediated cell migration, and PLD2 regulates Rac1 activation via PKC-
in HPAECs. In addition to Rac1, infection of HPAECs with dn Cdc42 or Rho (5 m.o.i.) partially reduced S1P-induced cell migration, confirming a role for these Rho family of GTPases in migration. Rac1 transduces signals from agonists to induce changes in cell motility, cytoskeletal organization, cell morphology, and adhesion. Although several earlier studies showed that growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and nerve growth factor caused Rac1 stimulated lamellipodia formation and cell migration (70, 71), the signaling pathway(s) of S1P-mediated Rac1 activation has been not studied. S1P-stimulated Rac1 activation is linked to cytoskeletal organization and barrier regulation of human lung ECs (72). In this study we identified PKC-
as a downstream target of PLD2 in mediating S1P signaling to Rac1 in HPAECs. Our current results on PLD2-dependent activation of Rac1 are in contrast to an earlier report on Rac1-dependent regulation of PLD1b by antigens in RBL-2H3 cells (73). Furthermore, we observed that dnRac1 or Rac1 siRNA had no effect on S1P-induced PLD activation, translocation of PKC-
and PKC-
to cell periphery, and transient increase of [Ca2+]i, further confirming that Rac1 is down-stream to PLD, PKC-
/PKC-
activation, and changes in intracellular Ca2+ (results not shown). Thus, Rac1 is not a prerequisite for initiation of S1P signaling via S1P1/Gi in HPAECs. Furthermore, S1P-induced transient [Ca2+]i was sensitive to PTx (
85% inhibition) and SB649146 (
80% inhibition) treatment, suggesting participation of S1P1 linked to Gi in the response (results not shown). Although, we have not studied the essential role of [Ca2+]i in endothelial cell motility, studies carried out in HUVECs indicate that [Ca2+]i signal is linked to S1P-induced cell migration via tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (2, 57).
S1P-induced cell migration is not completely attenuated by blocking PLD2 with catalytically inactive mutant/siRNA (Figs. 5B and 6B), which may reflect an incomplete inhibition of PLD2. However, we predict that additional pathways independent of PLD2 might be involved in mediating cell motility in HPAECs. For example, in HPAECs S1P also promotes Tiam1/Rac1 activation via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (74), suggesting a potential role for PI3K signaling in cell motility. Earlier, we demonstrated a role for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) in S1P-induced EC migration (75); however, it is unclear if PI3K signals via PKC-
and/or Rac1 in cell migration. Interestingly, blocking phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase with LY294002 (1-25 µM) did not attenuate S1P-induced PLD activation, indicating the absence of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent activation of PLD signaling by S1P in HPAECs.4 Furthermore, specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors couple growth factor signaling to the Rho family of GTPases (71, 76). The effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on Rac1-dependent motility of human umbilical vein ECs is regulated by Vav2 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) (69), and our preliminary results show that S1P-induced Rac1 activation is partly dependent on Tiam1, another GEF for Rac1.4 However, the role of Tiam1 in PLD2-dependent regulation of Rac1 via PKC-
is unclear, and future studies will address the role of guanine nucleotide exchange factors in S1P-induced cell motility.
S1P is a natural component of plasma and is present in nM to µM levels (7, 46). Although stimulation of human lung EC migration by S1P is important for normal blood vessel function, S1P also stimulates neovascularization and tumor cell metastasis. Precise understanding of S1P-mediated signaling is important in developing novel therapeutic agents against targets regulating EC motility. Our identification of PKC-
as an activator of PLD2 regulating S1P-induced migration and coupling PLD2 to Rac1 via PKC-
indicates that PKC-
and PLD2 could be potential targets for inhibiting excessive angiogenesis.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. 1-4 and Table 1. ![]()
1 Recipient of a Medical Scientist Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. ![]()
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine, The University of Chicago, CIS Bldg., Rm. W408B, 929 East 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-834-2638; Fax: 773-834-2687; E-mail: vnataraj{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
3 The abbreviations used are: S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; S1P1, S1P receptor; EC, endothelial cell; HPAEC, human pulmonary artery EC; PLC, phospholipase C; PLD, phospholipase D; PKC, protein kinase C; EGF, epidermal growth factor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PA, phosphatidic acid; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; dn, dominant negative; EGM, endothelial growth medium; EBM, endothelial basal medium; ECIS, electrical cell substrate impedance sensing; PTx, pertussis toxin; RT, reverse transcription; siRNA, small interfering RNA; BSA, bovine serum albumin; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection; PBt, phosphatidylbutanol; TBST, Tris-buffered saline Tween; FBS, fetal bovine serum; PBD, p21 binding domain. ![]()
4 I. Gorshkova and V. Natarajan, unpublished results. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
, -
, -
, -
, and -
isoforms. We thank the services of the University of Iowa Gene Transfer Vector Core, supported in part by the National Institutes of Health and Roy J. Carver Foundation, for viral amplification and generation of purified dominant negative PKC isoform adenoviral constructs. | REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. V. Usatyuk, I. A. Gorshkova, D. He, Y. Zhao, S. K. Kalari, J. G. N. Garcia, and V. Natarajan Phospholipase D-mediated Activation of IQGAP1 through Rac1 Regulates Hyperoxia-induced p47phox Translocation and Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Lung Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 29, 2009; 284(22): 15339 - 15352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Uhlig and E. Gulbins Sphingolipids in the Lungs Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2008; 178(11): 1100 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |