|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 24, 16781-16789, June 13, 2008
Hyaluronan Production in Synoviocytes as a Consequence of Viral InfectionsHAS1 ACTIVATION BY EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS AND SYNTHETIC DOUBLE- AND SINGLE-STRANDED VIRAL RNA ANALOGS*From the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rheumatology and Balneology, Kurbadstrasse 10, 1100 Vienna, Austria
Received for publication, February 29, 2008
One of the hallmarks of arthritis is swollen joints containing unusually high quantities of hyaluronan. Intact hyaluronan molecules facilitate cell migration by acting as ligands for CD44. Hyaluronan degradation products, readily formed at sites of inflammation, also fuel inflammatory processes. Irrespective of whether viruses could be a cause of rheumatoid arthritis, there is clear evidence that links viral infections to this debilitating disease. For this study, live Epstein-Barr virus and a number of double- and single-stranded synthetic viral analogs were tested for their effectiveness as activators of hyaluronan (HA) synthesis. As shown herein, Epstein-Barr virus-treated fibroblast-like synoviocytes significantly increase HA production and release. Real time reverse transcription-PCR data show that HAS1 mRNA levels are significantly elevated in virus-treated cells, whereas mRNA levels for the genes HAS2 and HAS3 remain unchanged. As to the mechanism of virus-induced HAS1 transcription, data are presented that imply that among the double- and single-stranded polynucleotides tested, homopolymeric polycytidylic structures are the most potent inducers of HAS1 transcription and HA release, whereas homopolymeric polyinosinic acid is without effect. Analyses of virus-induced signal cascades, utilizing chemical inhibitors of MAPK and overexpressing mutated IKK and I B, revealed that the MAPK p38 as well as the transcription factor NF- B are essential for virus-induced activation of HAS1. The presented data implicate HAS1 as the culprit in unfettered HA release and point out targets in virus-induced signaling pathways that might allow for specific interventions in cases of unwanted and uncontrolled HA synthesis.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)2 is a disease of largely unknown etiology. A series of mechanisms have been described that contribute to the progression of this debilitating disorder. A large body of evidence points at contributing factors such as altered apoptotic behavior of cells, the presence of a number of inflammatory cytokines, as well as the massive accumulation of lymphocytes at affected sites (1). Others, pointing at the abnormal production of rheumatoid factors in RA, favor the hypothesis that RA is an autoimmune disease or, referring to data regarding certain major histocompatibility complex class II molecules, link the onset of RA to certain genetic factors (1-7). Alternative hypotheses, however, refer to the fact that archeological signs of RA in the New World can be traced back more than 5000 years, whereas similar evidence is absent in the Old World before the 18th century (8). Such a marked geographic distribution has been interpreted as being consistent with the important role of environmental factors such as viruses in the genesis of RA (8). One of the most compelling hypotheses, however, implicates a special cell type found in the synovium of RA-affected joints, namely activated and proliferating fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), as playing an exceptionally important role in the genesis of RA. In support of this hypothesis, convincing evidence has been presented that FLS isolated from RA patients alone are sufficient to initiate and to propagate RA (9-11).
One of the early signs of RA are swollen joints. A hallmark of these swollen joints is the presence of large amounts of hyaluronan (HA). HA forms a fine layer in healthy joints. In RA-affected joints, however, HA levels can reach enormous levels that in some cases can be more than 100 times higher than what is found in healthy joints. In RA patients, even plasma levels of HA are elevated to such a degree that they could serve as a reliable marker of RA progression (12). Although small amounts of HA are essential for proper joint function, unfettered HA production is associated with a number of detrimental effects. Because HA accumulation is one of the early events in RA, I became interested in analyzing the expression pattern of HAS in synoviocytes isolated from RA patients. My working hypothesis is based on the assumption that in RA, one or more of the HA-coding genes might become unregulated, leading to the unwanted overproduction of HA. As a consequence, either HA itself or its degradation products might propagate inflammation in affected joints. Such a model, in which unfettered HA release sets in motion a series of events, is supported by the well known fact that HA degradation products clearly possess proinflammatory properties, act as chemoattractants, and have angiogenic properties, all highly undesired features in RA and in many other inflammatory settings (13).
We demonstrated earlier that hyaluronan synthase (HAS)2 and HAS3 are genes that are constitutively activated in FLS but also that mRNA levels of the gene encoding HAS1 are very low or undetectable (14). We showed that among the HAS genes in this cell type HAS1 is the only one that readily responded to a series of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL) IL-1 In recent years, effects of cytokines as well as of particular growth factors on genes encoding HAS have been studied and reported in increasing detail. Although it has been known that viruses can affect HA levels in tissues, I am are not aware of studies investigating the effects of virus infection on the particular HAS genes, nor of studies that might have elaborated on the structural requirements and molecular mechanisms of virus-induced changes in HAS expression and HA accumulation. Here, data of in vitro experiments are shown that detail some of the effects and mechanisms of changes of HA in FLS exposed to live virus and synthetic viral analogs.
Reagents—If not stated otherwise, reagents were from Sigma. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) was purchased from Strathmann (Strathmann Biotec, Hamburg, Germany). The MAPK inhibitors SB-203580, PD-98059, and the JNK inhibitor II SP600125 were from Calbiochem. Antibodies for p38, ERK, JNK, I B , p-I B used in Western blots were from Cell Signaling (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany). Antibodies used in EMSA supershift experiments were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The anti-tubulin antibody was from Neo Marker (Fremont CA). Oligonucleotides resembling consensus sequences for NF- B, AP-1, etc. were from Promega (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) or Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Purified Epstein-Barr virus 4.3 x 1010 virus particles/ml (1.3 mg/ml protein) and a transformation dose (TD50/ml of 5 x 106,25) was purchased from Advanced Biotechnologies Inc. (Columbia, MD).
Hyaluronan Measurements—HA was quantitated via a procedure provided by Corgenix (Corgenix, Westminster, CO), the provider of the HA measurement kits. In short, plates coated with HA-binding protein were incubated with supernatant (10 µl of supernatant diluted with 90 µl of reaction buffer) or standards, respectively, for 1 h (room temperature) in duplicates, washed five times with washing buffer, incubated with a solution containing horseradish peroxidase-conjugated HA-binding protein for 1 h at room temperature, washed again five times, and incubated with 100 µl of the provided substrate solution. After Nucleotide Preparation—With the exception of 5-, 10-, and 20-mers that were purchased from MWG Biotech AG (Ebersberg, Germany), polynucleotides were purchased from Sigma. All polymers were resuspended in endotoxin-free water. At all times, repetitive pipetting and/or excessive vortexing of solutions containing polynucleotides was avoided. Furthermore, rather than preparing serial dilutions in plastic tubes, polymers were added directly to cell culture dishes. Such a procedure was opted for to minimize loss of nucleotides because of absorption of polymers to pipette tips, plastic tubes, or tissue culture dishes.
Cell Culture—A series of human CD90-positive fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) isolated from RA patients was used for the reported experiments. These cells were either purchased from Dominion Pharmakine (Dominion Pharmakine, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain) or were a gift from Prof. G. Steiner (Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna). FLS were characterized by flow cytometry for the phenotype-specific marker CD90, and such data revealed a purity of Western Blot Experiments—SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were carried out essentially as described (16). Proteins were made visible using RenaissancePlus (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and Kodak BioMax MR films or the chemiluminescence detection device GeneGnome (Syngene, Cambridge, UK). In Western blot experiments, lower concentrations of proteins were loaded on separate gels that served as controls for loading and protein transfer. Such blots were stained with an antibody recognizing tubulin and/or with Ponceau Red.
Real Time RT-PCR, Data Analysis, and Quality Controls—Gene expression in FLS was measured by real time RT-PCR on an Mx3000P (Stratagene, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), using SYBR green as reporter fluorophore for quantitating mRNA levels. Results are expressed as relative threshold cycle (
EMSA—Preparation of nuclear extract, execution of EMSA, and EMSA specificity control experiments have been described in detail on a number of occasions (16, 19, 20). In short, oligonucleotides resembling consensus binding sites for NF-
All double-stranded oligonucleotides were end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and [
Controls and Statistical Analysis—Basal mRNA expression levels in unstimulated FLS or control animals were chosen to represent 1x expression of a given gene. Time course experiments (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, I
EBV and Synthetic Double-stranded Viral RNA (dsRNA) Analogs Induce HAS1 Synthesis and HA Release in FLS—EBV has been linked to the onset of RA (22). Whether exposure of FLS to EBV changes HAS expression patterns and to what degree HA synthesis is affected have been the focus of experiments shown in Fig. 1. FLS, grown to high density, were left untreated (Fig. 1, lane w/o), treated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml), or were exposed to purified, active EBV virus at concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 30 µg/ml medium. FLS were exposed to the virus for 1 h, and for the remaining hours of these experiments the virus concentration was 1/6 of the indicated initial concentration. The reason is that the total amount of medium initially was 0.5 ml per tissue culture dish, after 1 h; however, medium was added to the final amount of 3 ml used in all other culture dishes. Experiments were terminated after 8 h. HAS1 mRNA levels were significantly elevated in response to EBV treatment. HAS2 and HAS3 mRNA levels, however, were largely unchanged (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 1A, FLS exposed to 30 µg/ml (1 x 109 virus particles/ml) of viable EBV respond similarly to cells exposed to IL-1β, one of the strongest inducers of HAS1 in FLS (14). IL-1β data were generated from three independent experiments; mRNA levels of the EBV dose curve are the means ± S.D. of two independent experiments.
Next I tested whether elevated HAS1 mRNA levels also translate into higher HA synthesis by FLS exposed to EBV. Shown in Fig. 1B are data that demonstrate that similar to IL-1β (5 ng/ml), EBV (30 µg/ml) also induces the release of significantly increased amounts of HA into the culture supernatant (n = 3; p Shown in Fig. 1C are additional data that resulted from initial experiments exploring time requirements for the activation of HAS genes by EBV. Over the course of such experiments (3 days) in FLS, HAS1 is the only gene that quickly responded to EBV exposure, whereas steady state mRNA levels of HAS2 and HAS3 remained largely unaffected. Steady state mRNA levels for HAS1, HAS2, and HAS3 were monitored at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h following exposure of FLS to an initial concentration of 30 µg/ml of active EBV.
Double- and Single-stranded Viral RNA Activates HAS and HA Release—The synthetic dsRNA analog poly(I,C) has been used in the past to analyze virus-induced activation and signaling pathways (23, 24). As shown above, similar to EBV, poly(I,C) induces the release of HA in FLS. Shown in Fig. 2A are data that demonstrate that HAS1 mRNA levels in poly(I,C)-treated FLS are dose-dependently elevated and that low nanogram concentrations of this viral analog are sufficient to significantly increase HAS1 mRNA. Not shown are data that demonstrate that, like in EBV-treated cells, mRNA levels of HAS2 and HAS3 are not significantly affected at the time points measured. For comparison, FLS were also exposed to IL-1β (2.5 ng/ml) and to autologous human RNA used at a concentration of 10 µg/ml (Fig. 2A, lane labeled RNA hum 10 µg). Concentrations of poly(I,C) indicated on the x axis are in nanograms/ml. In Fig. 2A, lane w/o represents data collected from untreated cells. mRNA levels in treated cells were determined after a 12-h exposure. Starting from 20 ng/ml of poly(I,C) mRNA, levels of HAS1 are significantly higher (n = 3; p 0.05). After confirming that poly(I,C) and EBV act in similar ways regarding HAS activation and HA release, structural requirements of the synthetic viral mRNA analogs were tested. Singlestranded poly(A), poly(I), poly(C), and poly(U) were used to analyze their effectiveness as inducers of HAS1 transcription. Shown in Fig. 2B are data of experiments in which FLS were treated with 10 and 0.6 µg of ssRNA analogs for 8 h. FLS were left untreated (Fig. 2B, lane w/o) or were exposed to poly(C), poly(A), and poly(I). These data indicate that poly(C) is the most potent inducer of HAS1 translation followed by poly(A). Poly(I), however, only activates HAS1 significantly at the very high concentration of 10 µg/ml.
The fact that changes in mRNA levels induced by ssRNA translate into changes in HA production/release is shown in Fig. 2C. HA levels in cells treated with poly(C) are significantly higher than in control cells (Fig. 2C, lane w/o) (n = 6; p
Viral RNA Activates HAS1 through a MAPK p38 and Stressactivated Protein Kinase/JNK-dependent Pathway—Analyzing signaling pathways provides basic information with regard to regulatory mechanisms of a given gene as well as possible targets for future drug intervention. Shown in Fig. 3 are data that demonstrate that blocking the MAPK p38 pathway by chemical means nearly completely prevented poly(I,C)-induced HAS1 mRNA accumulation. Blocking the JNK pathway reduced poly(I,C)-induced HAS1 mRNA by roughly 50%. However, blocking the ERK pathway was without significant effect. In this type of experiment, FLS were preincubated with the indicated MAPK inhibitors for 60 min, afterward poly(I,C) (0.6 µg/ml) was added where indicated. RNA was isolated 8 h afterward. The MAPK p38 and JNK inhibitors were used at 5 µM and the ERK inhibitor at 10 µM, respectively.
Double- and Single-stranded RNA Analogs Activate NF-
Consensus NF-
A number of additional controls (competition and supershift assays) for EMSAs utilizing the consensus NF-
Poly(C)-induced HAS1 Activation Relies on the Activation of the Transcription Factor NF-
Polymers Shorter Than 20 bp Are Ineffective—In an initial attempt to investigate minimum length requirements of poly(C) structures that would activate HAS1, 5-, 10-, and 20-mer poly(C) oligonucleotides were used. As shown in Fig. 6A, compared with untreated cells (lane w/o), steady state HAS1 mRNA levels are not significantly altered in FLS that are treated for 8 h with 10 µg/ml of the indicated poly(C) polymers. With regard to HAS1 activation, these cells are fully functional, as is shown in control experiments demonstrating significantly increased levels of HAS1 mRNA in IL-1β (5 ng/ml)-treated cells. In FLS, HAS1 Is Not Activated in Response to Endotoxin—A number of experiments were performed to rule out the possibility that endotoxin contamination could play a role in the reported findings (at high polynucleotide concentrations results of endotoxin measurements were inconclusive). Endotoxin as well as Staphylococcus aureus suspensions have been shown to be potent inducers of proinflammatory genes. Shown in Fig. 6B are data in which FLS were treated for 8 h with 10 and 1000 ng/ml of endotoxin serotype 055:B5 or with 1000 ng/ml of endotoxin serotype 127:B8. In addition to using purified endotoxin, FLS were also exposed to solutions containing 50 µg/ml of fixed S. aureus (Fig. 6B, lane SA (50 µg/ml)) and to IL-1β (5 ng/ml). As shown in Fig. 6B, even the enormous concentrations of endotoxin used in these experiments did not result in significantly elevated steady state HAS1 mRNA levels in this cell type (n = 3; p = 0.05). HAS1, however, was highly up-regulated in these experiments in cells that were exposed to IL-1β.
Viruses are an amazingly diverse group of organisms. They have been categorized into seven groups based on their genetic material, e.g. dsDNA, ssDNA, dsRNA, ssRNA with DNA intermediate, ssDNA with RNA intermediate, etc. Viral infections directly account for, or are partially implicated in, an array of diseases as varied as viruses themselves. RA is a debilitating disease whose origin has also been linked to viral infections (22). At present, the best evidence linking viral infection and RA is provided for EBV. This dsDNA virus has repeatedly been implicated in arthritis. Patients suffering from RA have a 10-fold higher EBV DNA load in mononuclear cells than do mononuclear cells from healthy individuals; this elevation is stable and not influenced by the presence or absence of rheumatoid factor, age, duration of RA, disease activity, or RA treatment (22, 27). RA patients also have much higher numbers of EBV-infected B cells in their circulation and a significantly elevated load of EBV DNA in saliva (27, 28). Furthermore, a number of studies have shown that levels of EBV DNA and RNA are considerably higher in the synovium of RA patients than in healthy controls (29-32). Interestingly, EBV DNA loads are also highest in RA patients with at least one copy of the HLA-DRB1 epitope, the strongest known genetic risk factor for RA (30).
Irrespective of whether viruses are the cause or a consequence of RA, the above reports regarding the high viral load in synovium seemed important and led me to probe for a possible link between viral infection and HA production. To my knowledge, there is only one published report investigating the link between viral infections and HA synthesis. de La Motte et al. reported (24) that infection of smooth muscle cells with the respiratory syncytial virus resulted in increased adhesion of mononuclear cells, an event that has been found to be linked to increased HA synthesis.
HA degradation products are obviously detrimental in that they fuel inflammation (33-35). However, the concept that one or more of the intact HA molecules also contribute to inflammatory processes is rather new. It has, however, been known for a long time that HA is the main ligand for CD44. Nevertheless, efforts have nearly exclusively been directed at finding ways to prevent CD44 binding/activation, rather than on analyzing HA regulation. The reason for this seems to be that it is widely assumed that HA is ubiquitously present on all cells. At present, several years after the discovery of the three genes encoding HAS, rather little is known about the functional differences among HA molecules synthesized by these genes. Based on the unlikelihood that three genes encode for molecules with identical biological functions, I suggested that it was likely an HAS gene that is not activated in resting cells that takes part in inflammation. In FLS isolated from RA patients (the only cell type extensively studied in my laboratory), only HAS1 fulfills this requirement. HAS1 is the only gene that is readily activated by a number of cytokines that are considered to be classical mediators of inflammation such as tumor necrosis factor-
Considering all of the above, it is not surprising that it is HAS1 that responded to stimulation with EBV and that mRNA levels for HAS2 and HAS3 were basically unaffected. What is interesting is the fact that EBV, a virus that belongs to the class of dsDNA viruses, as well as synthetic viral RNA analogs were both potent inducers of HAS1. A finding like this points to structural requirements other than dsDNA versus single- or double-stranded RNA as being responsible for the effects on HAS1 activation. One likely explanation seems to be that it is not the difference in the sugar moiety of DNA and RNA (deoxyribose versus ribose) that defines activity with respect to HAS1 activation but rather the nitrogenous group of the nucleotides. From the data shown in this study, it also seems clear that a coiled structure, consisting of poly(I,C), is not essential and that it is solely the single poly(C) nucleotide string in poly(I,C) that mediates these effects. If such an interpretation is correct, viruses, independent of their class, should activate the pathway leading to HAS1 and likely many other NF-
From the demonstration that poly(C) oligonucleotides activate NF-
During the initial time course experiments, analyzing mRNA levels of HAS genes in response to viruses, it became evident that maximal steady state levels of HAS1 mRNA can be seen very early. Indeed, the time course of EBV-induced HAS1 activation in FLS is very similar to the one induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines. This seems to indicate that, at least for HAS1 induction in FLS, virus replication is not essential. That viruses or viral analogs can exert effects that are independent of virus replication has been shown before. For example, poly(I,C)-induced VCAM transcription in smooth muscle cells behaves in many ways very similar to HAS1 transcription in FLS. Vastly increased VCAM mRNA levels can be seen as early as 4 h and, after reaching maximal levels at around 8 h, taper off to nearly basal values (24). Although it is unclear how EBV, or for that matter polynucleotides, interacts with FLS, gp350 is the major envelope glycoprotein on EBV that specifically binds to CD21. Binding to this structure initiates viral replication. However, binding to CD21 also initiates a number of cellular and humoral immune responses that have been shown to be independent of viral replication. In monocyte-derived macrophages, for example, NF- Further support for the hypothesis that viral polynucleotides, fulfilling certain sequence requirements, could play a role in the activation of HAS and arthritis comes from the demonstration that nonmethylated bacterial DNA and synthetic DNA containing CpG motifs are able to induce arthritis (43). The absence of a poly(C) stretch with the required qualities as well as methylation of large parts of human DNA might explain why human DNA (data not shown) and autologous RNA were largely ineffective as inducers of HAS1.
Taken together the presented data strengthen the suggested link between HAS1 and inflammation in that exposure to virus as well as synthetic viral analogs activate only HAS1, leaving mRNA levels of the two other HAS genes unaltered. This is relevant because a causal link between activation of HAS genes and inflammation has already been established through the demonstration that virus-induced leukocyte adhesion in inflammation depends on newly synthesized HA (24). Also, p38 MAPK is an important signaling molecule leading to the activation of many proinflammatory genes (44, 45). As shown here, p38 is essential in that HAS1 induction in FLS by viral analogs depends to a large degree on the activation of this kinase. Finally, a further indirect indicator of the (patho)physiological functions of HAS1 is provided by the demonstration that virus-induced HAS1 depends on the activation of NF-
* This work was supported in part by a grant from the "Medizinisch Wissenschaftlichen Fonds des Bürgermeisters der Bundeshauptstadt Wien" Project 2508. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 43-676-322-4439; Fax: 43-1-680-099-234; E-mail: karlms{at}excite.com.
2 The abbreviations used are: RA, rheumatoid arthritis; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; HA, hyaluronan; FLS, fibroblast-like synoviocytes; HAS, hyaluronan synthase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ds, double-stranded; ss, single-stranded; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; HPRT, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase 1; RT, reverse transcription; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; CRE, cyclic AMP-responsive.
I thank C. Pollaschek for expert technical assistance and Prof. R. deMartin, Medical University of Vienna, for providing the adenovirus constructs.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||