Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.R700044200 on December 10, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 5, 2465-2469, February 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/5/2465    most recent
R700044200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Minireview

Phosphoinositide Lipid Phosphatases: Natural Regulators of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling in T Lymphocytes*

Stephanie J. Harris{ddagger}1, Richard V. Parry{ddagger}, John Westwick§, and Stephen G. Ward{ddagger}2

From the {ddagger}Inflammatory Cell Biology Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom and the §Respiratory Disease Area, Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Wimblehurst Road, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 5AB, United Kingdom


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathway has been implicated in a range of T lymphocyte cellular functions, particularly growth, proliferation, cytokine secretion, and survival. Dysregulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling and function in leukocytes, including B and T lymphocytes, has been implicated in many inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. As befits a pivotal signaling cascade, several mechanisms exist to ensure that the pathway is tightly regulated. This minireview focuses on two lipid phosphatases, viz. the 3'-phosphatase PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) and SHIP (Src homology 2 domain-containing inositol-5-phosphatase). We discuss their role in regulating T lymphocyte signaling as well their potential as future therapeutic targets.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
The PI3K3 pathway plays a central role in regulating many biological processes, primarily via the generation of the potent second messenger PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, which acts as a docking site at the plasma membrane, recruiting and activating proteins containing pleckstrin homology (PH) domains (1). These downstream PI3K effectors include PDK-1 (3'-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1), which phosphorylates and activates the AGC protein kinases, including protein kinase B/Akt. Other kinases such as Tec family kinases can also interact directly with PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, as can GTPase-activating proteins and guanine nucleotide exchange factors as well as scaffolding proteins that nucleate the assembly of key signaling complexes (1, 2).


    PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
T cells express all three class 1A PI3K isoforms (p110{alpha}, p110β, and p110{delta}), which are regulated by protein-tyrosine kinase-coupled receptors, as well as class 1B p110{gamma}, which is activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The T cell antigen receptor (TCR), CD28 family co-stimulatory receptors, and cytokine receptors activate class 1A isoforms (3). Chemokines (by virtue of interacting with GPCRs), activate mainly class 1B PI3K (4). Use of pharmacological tools in leukemic human T cell lines first indicated a possible role for PI3K in T cell activation (5). Mice with a knock-in point mutation of p110{delta} that abolishes kinase activity exhibit selective impairments in TCR signaling and reduced proliferation in vitro (6) and impaired function of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ TReg cells (7). Interestingly, mice lacking both p110{gamma} and p110{delta} show much more profound defects in thymocyte development and survival compared with mice lacking individual isoforms, indicating that these isoforms serve partially redundant functions in thymocytes (8, 9). Pathological consequences of combined p110{gamma}{delta} deficiency includes T cell lymphopenia, which leads to multiple-organ inflammation (10). Surprisingly, mice with T cell-specific loss of class 1A PI3K exhibit largely normal thymocyte development, and peripheral T cell numbers and subsets are unimpaired in young animals (11, 12). In vitro proliferation of T cells from these mice in response to TCR ligation is abrogated, and there is complete loss of PI3K signaling by the TCR and CD28. Although loss of class 1A function in T cells may not lead to significant T cell deficiency, it is worth noting that mice in which T cells are deficient in class 1 PI3Ks develop an autoimmune syndrome that may be related to the impaired TReg cell function reported in mice expressing a kinase-dead form of p110{delta} (11, 12).

The studies in gene-targeted mice underline the importance of the PI3K-dependent signaling pathway in T lymphocyte function, and it is therefore important that this pathway is tightly controlled. An important level of regulation is provided by at least two lipid phosphatases, viz. the ubiquitously expressed 3'-phosphatase PTEN and the 5'-phosphatase SHIP, which convert this lipid to PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(3,4)P2, respectively. The crucial role of these lipid phosphatases is underlined by the fact that PTEN and SHIP are frequently lost in many leukemias and immortalized leukemic cell lines (13).


    PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase That Regulates T Lymphocyte Signaling
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
PTEN is a well characterized tumor suppressor and is frequently inactivated by mutation, gene deletion, or epigenetic silencing (13). As such, it is widely viewed as the sentinel phosphatase responsible for regulating levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 (Fig. 1). A germ line PTEN knock-out is embryonic-lethal (14), but tissue-specific and heterozygous knock-outs have helped elucidate the function of PTEN as a negative regulator in the immune system. For example, PTEN heterozygous mice develop an autoimmune lymphoproliferation by 9 months of age (15), and T cell-specific PTEN knock-out mice exhibit splenomegaly and an enlargement of the thymus (16). T cell-specific loss of PTEN leads to hyperproliferation, autoreactive T cells, resistance to apoptosis, increased PI3K-dependent signaling events such as phosphorylation of protein kinase B/Akt, and increased secretion of cytokines (16). This is consistent with reports that PTEN also has a role in Th2-driven inflammation (17, 18).


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.
PTEN and SHIP regulate cellular levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. Shown is the metabolic pathway of the 3'-phosphoinositide lipids. The role of PtdIns(3,5)P2 in T lymphocytes has not been explored extensively, and its metabolism is not depicted in detail. Similarly, the subclasses of PI3K, PI5K, and PI4K mediating specific steps in metabolism are not depicted. There may be some overlap depending on constitutive PI3K activity, but PTEN functions as a sentinel to regulate constitutive/low receptor-stimulated levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, whereas SHIP functions primarily to control receptor-activated levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. SHIP fulfills a gatekeeper role and"switches"signal transduction pathways away from PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-dependent effectors toward PtdIns(3,4)P2-dependent effectors, in turn influencing kinetics and duration of recruitment of 3'-phosphoinositide lipid-binding proteins at the plasma membrane. MTM, myotubularin; PKB, protein kinase B. 4-PPase, phosphoinositide lipid 4'-phosphatase.

 
The PTEN- and SHIP-null Jurkat leukemic T cell line has been used extensively to assess the ability of these lipid phosphatases to functionally oppose PI3K in TCR and CD28 signaling (4). In keeping with its proposed role as a sentinel phosphatase, restoration of PTEN expression in Jurkat cells is unable to oppose PI3K activity during acute TCR stimulation, but is important for maintaining low basal levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 before and after TCR signaling (19, 20). This would allow cells to discriminate between transient and persistent TCR stimulation and the presence or absence of co-stimulation signals, thus setting the threshold for cellular activation via the TCR. Accordingly, in PTEN-null T cells, TCR stimulation alone (in the absence of co-stimulation) is sufficient to induce hyperactivation of the PI3K pathway and enhanced IL-2 production. Thus, PTEN imposes a requirement for CD28 co-stimulation (19, 20), consistent with defects in central and peripheral tolerance observed in T cell-specific PTEN-null mice (16). PTEN can be down-regulated after T cell activation, and this TCR priming facilitates IL-2-induced proliferation of CD4+CD25+ TReg cells. Hence, TReg cells deficient in PTEN can be expanded in response to IL-2 alone without the need to stimulate the TCR and without loss of suppressor function (21).


    A Fleet of Multitasking SHIP Molecules
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
SHIP-1 is a 145-kDa protein largely confined to hematopoietic cells, whereas the 150-kDa SHIP-2 is more widely expressed. SHIP-1 (henceforth referred to as SHIP) is a well characterized inhibitory molecule that is recruited by engagement of the inhibitory Fc{gamma} type IIB receptor in B cells and mast cells or by engagement of Fc{epsilon} type I or Fc{gamma} type III, cytokine, and growth factor receptors in myeloid cells (22). Once recruited to the plasma membrane by signaling complexes, its enzymatic activity depletes PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and prevents membrane localization of some PH domain-containing effectors, ultimately leading to impaired PI3K-dependent signaling events (23).

In addition to a core catalytic domain that is responsible for the hydrolysis of the 5'-phosphate on PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, SHIP contains multiple structural domains that facilitate protein-protein interactions (Fig. 2). Hence, these structural domains are able to support the relocalization of SHIP from the cytosol to the plasma membrane, where its catalytic activity regulates PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 accumulation (22, 24). In addition, these structural features and binding motifs allow SHIP to serve a scaffolding role for the recruitment of other proteins to the plasma membrane independent of catalytic function.

Multiple forms of SHIP have been reported with molecular masses of 145, 135, 130, 125 and 110 kDa (23, 25) that may arise from alternative mRNA splicing, protein degradation, or post-translational modification such as phosphorylation. As a consequence, the different forms of SHIP exhibit different protein binding profiles defined by the absence or presence of distinct binding motifs (Fig. 1). For example, s-SHIP (expression of which is restricted to murine embryonic stem cells) and its human homolog, SIP-110, are truncated at the N terminus and lack the SH2 domain, which limits the repertoire of binding proteins available (26, 27).


    Is SHIP a Terminator or a Gatekeeper?
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
Although many PH domains (e.g. those within Grp-1) are recruited exclusively to PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, some such as DAPP1 (dual adaptor of phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphoinositides 1) can interact with both PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2. In addition, TAPP (tandem PH domain-containing protein) contains PH domains that can exhibit selectivity toward PtdIns(3,4)P2 (28). The ability of PH domain-containing proteins to discriminate between different 3'-phosphoinositide lipids suggests that SHIP can act as a switch to redirect PI3K-dependent signaling toward another set of distinct effectors that are temporally and functionally separate from PtdIns-(3,4,5)P3-dependent events. Hence, although the role of PTEN appears to be as a sentinel, regulating basal/low receptor-stimulated levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, SHIP potentially fulfills a more subtle "gatekeeper" role, able to redirect signaling rather than stop it (Fig. 1).


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.
Structural features of the SHIP fleet. The protein interaction motifs of SHIP proteins are indicated, along with their binding partners. The SH2 domain binds preferentially to the sequence phospho-Y(Y/S/T)L(M/L) found in the proteins indicated as well as certain immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs (ITIMs) and some immunoreceptor activation motifs (ITAMs). Meanwhile, the NPXY motifs in their phosphorylated state can bind phosphotyrosine-binding domains. A putative C2 domain reported to bind PtdIns(3,4)P2 is indicated, but the existence of this domain remains to be verified. The proline-rich domain (PRD) can bind selected SH3 domain-containing proteins such as Src and is essential to SHIP function. Regions lost in SHIP-1 because of alternative splicing and proteolytic cleavage of the protein are also shown, along with the approximate molecular masses of the resulting proteins. The 110-kDa protein SIP-110 lacks an SH2 domain, likely arises from use of an internal promoter, and contains a unique amino acid sequence at the N terminus. Note that, in mice, a SHIP isoform with a molecular mass of 110 kDa also arises from an out-of-frame splice in the C-terminal region (56). Finally, murine SHIP-1 mRNA can contain a 183-bp deletion (282 bp in humans). This results in a 135-kDa protein with the deletion occurring in the proline-rich domain between the two NPXY motifs (57). PDZ-BD, PDZ-binding domain; SAM, sterile {alpha}-motif.

 

    Insights into the Role of SHIP in T Lymphocytes from Gene Targeting Strategies
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
Several lines of evidence indicate a prominent regulatory role for SHIP in T cell biology. For example, SHIP is tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to TCR and CD28 ligation (29). Moreover, expression of a constitutively active SHIP mutant in the leukemic T cell line Jurkat regulates constitutive PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 levels and CD28-activated PI3K effectors (30). In addition, SHIP interacts with Tec kinase and inhibits its function in T cells (31) as well as participates in a negative signaling complex by associating with the adaptor protein LAT (32). SHIP has also been shown to have a protective role in T lymphocytes exposed to oxidative stress (33). Despite this evidence, the impact of SHIP deletion on T cell biology was initially thought to be rather mild, although these mice exhibited defects in B cell development as well as excessive myeloid cell activation (34, 35). However, the SHIP–/– mice were generated using a strategy that leaves s-SHIP expression intact, and likewise, the ubiquitously expressed SHIP-2 also remains and may compensate for lack of SHIP, contributing to the mild phenotype.

Closer analysis of peripheral T cells from SHIP-null mice reveals that they are constitutively activated and give rise to increased numbers of CD4+CD25+ TReg cells, suggesting a key regulatory role for SHIP in TReg cell development (36). However, this may be a consequence of the inflammatory environment brought about by SHIP-deficient myeloid cells rather than a T cell defect per se. To avoid the pleiotropic effects of the SHIP-null deletion, more refined and T cell lineage-specific deletion strategies have been employed. Interestingly, T cell-specific deletion of SHIP does not alter T cell development, activation state, or number of TReg cells (37). Instead, this approach has uncovered a failure to skew toward Th2 in response to challenge with Schistosoma mansoni. This is most likely a consequence of enhanced sensitivity to cytokines that mediate induction of the Th1-associated transcription factor T-bet. SHIP-null CD8+ T cells also show more efficient cytotoxic responses consistent with elevated T-bet levels (37). It appears therefore that, in T cells, SHIP negatively regulates cytokine-mediated activation in a way that allows effective Th2 responses and limits T cell cytotoxicity.


    Role of PTEN and SHIP in T Lymphocyte Migration
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
The ability of naïve and activated T cells to migrate toward chemoattractants is a key feature of basic immunosurveillance and the adaptive immune response. Several lines of evidence support an evolutionarily conserved role for PI3K in cell motility and directional migration toward chemoattractants. Chemokine interaction with GPCRs on T lymphocytes has been shown to depend predominantly on Gi proteins, and these receptors are predominantly coupled to the β{gamma}-dependent p110{gamma} isoform (38). PI3K is activated by most chemokine receptors expressed on T cells, yet paradoxically, it is now clear that activation of PI3K by chemokines can be a dispensable signal for directional migration of T cells (3, 39).

Studies in neutrophil-like cell lines and the ameba Dictyostelium discoideum have shown that distinct localization of PI3K and PTEN amplifies the distribution of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 with respect to the chemoattractant gradient (40). Hence, PI3Ks are recruited to the plasma membrane at the front of cells, resulting in localized production of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. Conversely, PTEN is recruited to the back and sides of cells (41, 42). Similar redistribution of PTEN in mammalian leukocytes remains controversial, and although some evidence exists for accumulation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 at the leading edge of neutrophils (43), it has not so far been demonstrated in T lymphocytes. It is worth noting that neutrophils and T cell lines deficient in PTEN are still able to migrate toward chemoattractants (3, 39). In fact, both PTEN-null neutrophils and T cell lines in which PTEN expression has been suppressed by small interfering RNA exhibit enhanced directional migration (44, 45), whereas reconstitution of PTEN expression in Jurkat cells down-regulates CXCL12-stimulated cell migration (44). Interestingly, recent studies performed in SHIP-null neutrophils revealed that PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 failed to localize to the front of the cell, suggesting that SHIP governs polarization and the formation of the leading edge. Introduction of constitutively active SHIP into leukemic cell lines normally deficient in SHIP abrogates CXCL12-mediated chemotaxis (46). Together, these observations suggest that both PTEN and SHIP can negatively regulate leukocyte migration, but are dispensable for directional sensing.


    Evidence for a Role of Other Lipid Phosphatases in T Lymphocyte Activation
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
Although PTEN and SHIP are the best characterized phosphoinositide lipid phosphatases, there are at least 28 phosphoinositide lipid phosphatases in humans, a number of which show activity toward 3'-phosphoinositide lipids (47, 48). MTMR6, a member of the myotubularin family of 3'-phosphatases with specificity for PtdIns(3)P and PtdIns(3,5)P2 (Fig. 1), binds the KCa3.1 calcium-activated potassium channel through coiled-coil domain interaction (49). The KCa3.1 channel is essential in the maintenance of the membrane potential that drives Ca2+ influx during activation of naive and memory CD4+ T cells. MTMR6 is postulated to regulate T cell activation by dephosphorylating the PtdIns(3)P, which is required for activation of the KCa channel. Accordingly, overexpression of MTMR6 inhibits calcium influx in CD4+ T cells and reduces their proliferation in response to antigen. These studies suggest that MTMR6 may have a role in maintaining tolerance and preventing autoimmune disease.


    Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited by Pathogens
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
Given the potential of 3'-phosphoinositide lipid phosphatases to modulate acquired immune responses, it is not surprising that they are targeted by pathogens to evade immune detection and subsequent destruction. For example, cytolethal distending toxin subunit B (CdtB) is an immunotoxin produced by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans that can hydrolyze PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2 (50). Exposure to CdtB leads to cell cycle arrest and death by apoptosis, consistent with the down-regulation of proliferation observed upon overexpression of SHIP in leukemic cell lines (51). Lymphocytes are considerably more sensitive to CdtB than are other cell types. The lipid phosphatase activity of CdtB activity may therefore result in reduced immune function, facilitating chronic infection with Actinobacillus and other enteropathogens that express Cdt proteins (50).

The measles virus evades destruction by the immune system at least in part by targeting negative regulation of PI3K/Akt signaling. It induces expression of SIP-110, which depletes the cellular PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 pools, suggesting that the threshold for activation signals for induction of T cell proliferation is raised (52, 53).


    Lipid Phosphatases as Targets for Drug Discovery
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
Because of its widespread and diverse function in the immune system, there is a growing appreciation of the therapeutic potential of inhibitors of the PI3K pathway in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. This has stimulated intense interest in compounds with suitable pharmacological profiles. These are primarily directed toward PI3K isoforms, with many small-molecule ATP-competitive inhibitors currently in development (54). However, achieving isoform selectivity of PI3K inhibitors has proven to be nontrivial, and current thinking suggests that selective pan-isoform inhibitors may actually prove to be therapeutically useful (54). It is therefore worth highlighting that activation of the lipid phosphatases that regulate cellular levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 offers the same therapeutic benefits as inhibition of PI3K and that phosphatases may be more tractable targets in the long term.

With its expression largely restricted to hematopoietic cells, drug-mediated activation of SHIP would offer the ability to target hematopoietic and immune disorders in which the PI3K pathway is dysregulated, such as autoimmune syndromes and inflammatory conditions. Conversely, inhibitors of lipid phosphatases might be expected to improve T lymphocyte function either during immunodeficiency syndromes or as part of antitumor therapies. Of particular note is the recent identification of pelorol, a meroterpenoid originally isolated from the marine sponge Dactylospongia elegans as an activator of SHIP (24). More potent synthetic analogs of pelorol have been shown to exhibit anti-inflammatory effects in in vitro and in vivo models (24). Moreover, these derivatives appear to act through allosteric activation of SHIP by binding to a putative C2 domain. Conceptually, use of an allosteric regulator reduces the chances of off-target effects compared with compounds that target the conserved ATP-binding domain in kinases (24).


    Conclusion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 
PTEN and SHIP provide tight regulation of the PI3K pathway and are essential not only for normal immune system development and responsiveness but also for prevention of immunopathology. Indeed, unchecked activation of the PI3K pathway in T cells induces lymphoproliferation and systemic autoimmunity. To date, however, the interest in these lipid phosphatases as pharmacological targets has been limited, perhaps because phosphatases per se have been perceived to be less druggable than the kinome. The recent validation of small-molecule entities that can modulate both PTEN and SHIP demonstrates that modulation of lipid phosphatase function is now becoming a tractable proposition (24, 55). The power of this approach to immunomodulation is demonstrated in nature by the observation that some pathogens utilize phosphatases to effect immune escape. Therefore, we cannot afford to neglect lipid phosphatases during either the study of biological processes or drug discovery.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This minireview will be reprinted in the 2008 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in January, 2009. Back

1 Recipient of a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council doctoral training award. Back

2 Royal Society Industrial Fellow. To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.g.ward{at}bath.ac.uk.

3 The abbreviations used are: PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate; PH, pleckstrin homology; GPCRs, G protein-coupled receptors; TCR, T cell antigen receptor; TReg, regulatory T cell; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; SHIP, Src homology 2 domain-containing inositol-5-phosphatase; s-SHIP, stem cell-specific SHIP isoform; PtdIns(3,4)P2, phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate; IL-2, interleukin-2; SH2, Src homology 2; CdtB, cytolethal distending toxin subunit B. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PI3K and T Lymphocytes
 PTEN, a Sentinel Phosphatase...
 A Fleet of Multitasking...
 Is SHIP a Terminator...
 Insights into the Role...
 Role of PTEN and...
 Evidence for a Role...
 Lipid Phosphatases Are Exploited...
 Lipid Phosphatases as Targets...
 Conclusion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Vanhaesebroeck, B., Leevers, S. J., Ahmadi, K., Timms, J., Katso, R., Driscoll, P. C., Woscholski, R., Parker, P. J., and Waterfield, M. D. (2001) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 535–602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Parry, R. V., Whittaker, G. C., Sims, M., Edmead, C. E., Welham, M. J., and Ward, S. G. (2006) J. Immunol. 176, 594–602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ward, S. G., and Cantrell, D. A. (2001) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 13, 332–338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Astoul, E., Edmunds, C., Cantrell, D. A., and Ward, S. G. (2001) Trends Immunol. 22, 490–496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Deane, J. A., and Fruman, D. A. (2004) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22, 563–598[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Okkenhaug, K., Bilancio, A., Farjot, G., Priddle, H., Sancho, S., Peskett, E., Pearce, W., Meek, S. E., Salpekar, A., Waterfield, M. D., Smith, A. J., and Vanhaesebroeck, B. (2002) Science 297, 1031–1034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Patton, D. T., Garden, O. A., Pearce, W. P., Clough, L. E., Monk, C. R., Leung, E., Rowan, W. C., Sancho, S., Walker, L. S., Vanhaesebroeck, B., and Okkenhaug, K. (2006) J. Immunol. 177, 6598–6602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Sasaki, T., Irie-Sasaki, J., Jones, R. G., Oliveira-dos-Santos, A. J., Stanford, W. L., Bolon, B., Wakeham, A., Itie, A., Bouchard, D., Kozieradzki, I., Joza, N., Mak, T. W., Ohashi, P. S., Suzuki, A., and Penninger, J. M. (2000) Science 287, 1040–1046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Webb, L. M., Vigorito, E., Wymann, M. P., Hirsch, E., and Turner, M. (2005) J. Immunol. 175, 2783–2787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ji, H., Rintelen, F., Waltzinger, C., Bertschy Meier, D., Bilancio, A., Pearce, W., Hirsch, E., Wymann, M. P., Ruckle, T., Camps, M., Vanhaesebroeck, B., Okkenhaug, K., and Rommel, C. (2007) Blood 110, 2940–2947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Deane, J. A., Kharas, M. G., Oak, J. S., Stiles, L. N., Luo, J., Moore, T. I., Ji, H., Rommel, C., Cantley, L. C., Lane, T. E., and Fruman, D. A. (2007) Blood 109, 2894–2902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Oak, J. S., Deane, J. A., Kharas, M. G., Luo, J., Lane, T. E., Cantley, L. C., and Fruman, D. A. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 16882–16887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cully, M., You, H., Levine, A. J., and Mak, T. W. (2006) Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 184–192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Di Cristofano, A., Pesce, B., Cordon-Cardo, C., and Pandolfi, P. P. (1998) Nature Genetics 19, 348–355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Di Cristofano, A., Kotsi, P., Peng, Y. F., Cordon-Cardo, C., Elkon, K. B., and Pandolfi, P. P. (1999) Science 285, 2122–2125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Suzuki, A., Yamaguchi, M. T., Ohteki, T., Sasaki, T., Kaisho, T., Kimura, Y., Yoshida, R., Wakeham, A., Higuchi, T., Fukumoto, M., Tsubata, T., Ohashi, P. S., Koyasu, S., Penninger, J. M., Nakano, T., and Mak, T. W. (2001) Immunity 14, 523–534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kwak, Y. G., Song, C. H., Yi, H. K., Hwang, P. H., Kim, J. S., Lee, K. S., and Lee, Y. C. (2003) J. Clin. Investig. 111, 1083–1092[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Lee, K. S., Kim, S. R., Park, S. J., Lee, H. K., Park, H. S., Min, K. M., Jin, S. M., and Lee, Y. C. (2006) Mol. Pharmacol. 69, 1829–1839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Seminario, M. C., Precht, P., Bunnell, S. C., Warren, S. E., Morris, C. M., Taub, D., and Wange, R. L. (2004) Eur. J. Immunol. 34, 3165–3175[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Shan, X., Czar, M. J., Bunnell, S. C., Liu, P., Liu, Y., Schwartzberg, P. L., and Wange, R. L. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 6945–6957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Walsh, P. T., Buckler, J. L., Zhang, J., Gelman, A. E., Dalton, N. M., Taylor, D. K., Bensinger, S. J., Hancock, W. W., and Turka, L. A. (2006) J. Clin. Investig. 116, 2521–2531[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Sly, L. M., Ho, V., Antignano, F., Ruschmann, J., Hamilton, M., Lam, V., Rauh, M. J., and Krystal, G. (2007) Front. Biosci. 12, 2836–2848[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Rohrschneider, L. R., Fuller, J. F., Wolf, I., Liu, Y., and Lucas, D. M. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 505–520[Free Full Text]
  24. Ong, C. J., Ming-Lum, A., Nodwell, M., Ghanipour, A., Yang, L., Williams, D. E., Kim, J., Demirjian, L., Qasimi, P., Ruschmann, J., Cao, L. P., Ma, K., Chung, S. W., Duronio, V., Andersen, R. J., Krystal, G., and Mui, A. L. (2007) Blood 110, 1942–1949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Damen, J. E., Liu, L., Ware, M. D., Ermolaeva, M., Majerus, P. W., and Krystal, G. (1998) Blood 92, 1199–1205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tu, Z., Ninos, J. M., Ma, Z., Wang, J. W., Lemos, M. P., Desponts, C., Ghansah, T., Howson, J. M., and Kerr, W. G. (2001) Blood 98, 2028–2038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kavanaugh, W. M., Pot, D. A., Chin, S. M., Deuter-Reinhard, M., Jefferson, A. B., Norris, F. A., Masiarz, F. R., Cousens, L. S., Majerus, P. W., and Williams, L. T. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 438–445[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Lemmon, M. A., and Ferguson, K. M. (2000) Biochem. J. 350, 1–18[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Edmunds, C., Parry, R. V., Burgess, S. J., Reaves, B., and Ward, S. G. (1999) Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 3507–3515[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Freeburn, R. W., Wright, K. L., Burgess, S. J., Astoul, E., Cantrell, D. A., and Ward, S. G. (2002) J. Immunol. 169, 5441–5450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Tomlinson, M. G., Heath, V. L., Turck, C. W., Watson, S. P., and Weiss, A. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 55089–55096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Dong, S., Corre, B., Foulon, E., Dufour, E., Veillette, A., Acuto, O., and Michel, F. (2006) J. Exp. Med. 203, 2509–2518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Gloire, G., Charlier, E., Rahmouni, S., Volanti, C., Chariot, A., Erneux, C., and Piette, J. (2006) Oncogene 25, 5485–5494[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Helgason, C. D., Damen, J. E., Rosten, P., Grewal, R., Sorensen, P., Chappel, S. M., Borowski, A., Jirik, F., Krystal, G., and Humphries, R. K. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 1610–1620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Liu, Q., Oliveira-Dos-Santos, A. J., Mariathasan, S., Bouchard, D., Jones, J., Sarao, R., Kozieradzki, I., Ohashi, P. S., Penninger, J. M., and Dumont, D. J. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 188, 1333–1342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Kashiwada, M., Cattoretti, G., McKeag, L., Rouse, T., Showalter, B. M., Al-Alem, U., Niki, M., Pandolfi, P. P., Field, E. H., and Rothman, P. B. (2006) J. Immunol. 176, 3958–3965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Tarasenko, T., Kole, H. K., Chi, A. W., Mentink-Kane, M. M., Wynn, T. A., and Bolland, S. (2007) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 11382–11387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Smith, L. D., Hickman, E. S., Parry, R. V., Westwick, J., and Ward, S. G. (2007) Cell. Signal. 19, 2528–2539[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ward, S. G. (2006) Trends Immunol. 27, 80–87[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Franca-Koh, J., Kamimura, Y., and Devreotes, P. (2006) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 333–338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Iijima, M., and Devreotes, P. (2002) Cell 109, 599–610[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Funamoto, S., Meili, R., Lee, S., Parry, L., and Firtel, R. A. (2002) Cell 109, 611–623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Weiner, O. D., Neilsen, P. O., Prestwich, G. D., Kirschner, M. W., Cantley, L. C., and Bourne, H. R. (2002) Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 509–513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Gao, P., Wange, R. L., Zhang, N., Oppenheim, J. J., and Howard, O. M. (2005) Blood 106, 2619–2626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Subramanian, K. K., Jia, Y., Zhu, D., Simms, B. T., Jo, H., Hattori, H., You, J., Mizgerd, J. P., and Luo, H. R. (2007) Blood 109, 4028–4037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Wain, C. M., Westwick, J., and Ward, S. G. (2005) Cell. Signal. 17, 1194–1202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Blero, D., Payrastre, B., Schurmans, S., and Erneux, C. (2007) Pfluegers Arch. 455, 31–44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Krauss, M., and Haucke, V. (2007) EMBO Rep. 8, 241–246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Srivastava, S., Ko, K., Choudhury, P., Li, Z., Johnson, A. K., Nadkarni, V., Unutmaz, D., Coetzee, W. A., and Skolnik, E. Y. (2006) Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 5595–5602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Shenker, B. J., Dlakic, M., Walker, L. P., Besack, D., Jaffe, E., LaBelle, E., and Boesze-Battaglia, K. (2007) J. Immunol. 178, 5099–5108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Horn, S., Endl, E., Fehse, B., Weck, M. M., Mayr, G. W., and Jucker, M. (2004) Leukemia (Basingstoke) 18, 1839–1849
  52. Avota, E., Harms, H., and Schneider-Schaulies, S. (2006) Cell. Microbiol. 8, 1826–1839[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Avota, E., Muller, N., Klett, M., and Schneider-Schaulies, S. (2004) J. Virol. 78, 9552–9559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Crabbe, T., Welham, M. J., and Ward, S. G. (2007) Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 450–456[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Rosivatz, E., Matthews, J. G., McDonald, N. Q., Mulet, X., Ho, K. K., Lossi, N., Schmid, A. C., Mirabelli, M., Pomeranz, K. M., Erneux, C., Lam, E. W., Vilar, R., and Woscholski, R. (2006) ACS Chem. Biol. 1, 780–790[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Wolf, I., Lucas, D. M., Algate, P. A., and Rohrschneider, L. R. (2000) Genomics 69, 104–112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Lucas, D. M., and Rohrschneider, L. R. (1999) Blood 93, 1922–1933[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Li, N. Saga, and K. Mikami
Ca2+ influx and phosphoinositide signalling are essential for the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity in monospores from the red alga Porphyra yezoensis
J. Exp. Bot., June 16, 2009; (2009) erp183v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/5/2465    most recent
R700044200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement