Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 7, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/27/18677    most recent
M600543200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Erie, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Erie, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print April 18, 2006
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M600543200
Submitted on January 18, 2006
Accepted on April 17, 2006

Kinetic investigation of E. coli RNA polymerase mutants that influence nucleotide discrimination and transcription fidelity

Shannon F. Holmes, Thomas J. Santangelo, Candice K. Cunningham, Jeffrey W. Roberts, and Dorothy A. Erie

Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290

Corresponding Author: derie{at}email.unc.edu

Recent RNA polymerase (RNAP) structures led to a proposed three-step model of nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) binding, discrimination, and incorporation. NTPs are thought to enter through the secondary channel, bind to an E site, rotate into a pre-insertion (PS) site and ultimately align in the catalytic (A) site. We characterized the kinetics of correct and incorrect incorporation for several E. coli RNAPs with substitutions in the proposed NTP entry pore (secondary channel). Substitutions of the semi-conserved residue ßD675, which is >10Å away from these sites, significantly reduce fidelity; however, substitutions of the totally conserved residues ßR678 and ßD814 do not significantly alter the correct or incorrect incorporation kinetics, even though the corresponding residues in RNAPII crystal structures appear to be interacting with the NTP phosphate groups and coordinating the second magnesium ion in the active site, respectively. Structural analysis suggests that the lower fidelity of the ßD675 mutants most likely results from reduction of the negative potential of a small pore between the E and PS sites and elimination of several structural interactions around the pore. We suggest a mechanism of nucleotide discrimination that is governed both by rotation of the NTP through this pore and subsequent rearrangement or closure of RNAP to align the NTP in the A site.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement