Identification of Domains of the Human AGraphic Adenosine Receptor That Are Important for Binding Receptor Subtype-selective Ligands Using Chimeric AGraphic/AGraphic Adenosine Receptors (*)

  1. Scott A. Rivkees(§),
  2. Mark E. Lasbury and
  3. Hemang Barbhaiya
  1. From the Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Pediatric Endocrine Unit, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Program of Neurobiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  1. § To whom correspondence should be addressed:
    Riley Hospital, Rm. 5984, 702 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46202.
    Fax: 317-274-5378; srivkee{at}Indyvax.IUPUI.edu

Abstract

To provide new insights into the regions of the human A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) involved in ligand binding, a series of chimeric human A1 and rat AGraphic adenosine receptors (A1/AGraphic) were studied. Binding studies were initially performed on acutely transfected COS cells using fixed doses of the AGraphicAR agonist [3H]CGS-21680, the A1AR agonist [3H]2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), and the A1AR antagonist [3H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX). When the region of the AGraphicAR from the amino terminus to the end of transmembrane (TM) 1 was replaced by the corresponding region of the A1AR (A1TM1/AGraphic), [3H]CGS-21680 and [3H]CCPA binding was detectable. When an A1TM1-2/AGraphic construct was studied, [3H]CGS-21680 binding was lost and [3H] DPCPX binding appeared. Saturation studies using [3H]CCPA revealed that the A1TM1/AGraphic construct had low affinity. However, with the subsequent addition of A1AR TMs 2-4 receptor affinity improved markedly. Saturation studies using [3H]DPCPX also revealed that the TMs 1-4 of the A1AR conferred wild-type receptor affinity. When the ligand binding properties of A1TM1-4/AGraphic, A1TM1-6/AGraphic, and wild type A1AR constructs were directly compared, no differences were found using 10 different compounds. When truncated A1ARs that extended from the amino terminus to shortly after TM4 were examined, no binding was detectable suggesting that the amino half of the receptor alone is not sufficient for ligand binding. Collectively, these data suggest that the important determinants for A1AR agonist and antagonist binding and ligand specificity are present in TMs 1-4.

Footnotes

  • * This work was supported by a Grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association, the James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association, and National Institutes of Health Grant RO1NS326224. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBank [GenBank]and X68485[GenBank].

  • 1 The abbreviations used are:

    AR

    adenosine receptor

    TM

    transmembrane

    PCR

    polymerase chain reaction

    CCPA

    2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine

    DPCPX

    8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine

    3′

    3′-deoxyadenosine

    5MT

    5′-deoxy-5′-methyl-thioadenosine

    CSC

    8-(3-chlorostylryl)caffeine

    DMPA

    N6-[2-(3,5-dimetoxyphenyl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)-ethyl]adenosine

    NECA

    5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine: ANOVA, one way analysis of variance.

  • 2 S. A. Rivkees, unpublished results.

    • Received June 2, 1995.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Advertisement