Inducible Interaction of Integrin α2β1 with Calreticulin

DEPENDENCE ON THE ACTIVATION STATE OF THE INTEGRIN (*)

  1. Marc Coppolino(1),
  2. Chungyee Leung-Hagesteijn(1),
  3. Shoukat Dedhar(1)(§) and
  4. John Wilkins(2)
  1. From the (1) Division of Cancer Biology Research, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada and
  2. (2) RDU Research Laboratory Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba K3A 1M4, Canada
  1. § To whom correspondence should be addressed:
    Division of Cancer Biology Research, Reichmann Research Bldg., S-218 Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.
    Tel.: 416-480-5711; Fax: 416-480-5703.

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated an interaction between the highly conserved KXGFFKR sequence of the integrin α-subunit cytoplasmic domains and calreticulin. Since this highly conserved sequence motif has been implicated in the regulation of the integrin affinity state, we wanted to determine whether the calreticulin-integrin interaction also depended on the integrin affinity state, and whether calreticulin occupation of integrin via the KXGFFKR motif was involved in the regulation of the ligand affinity state. We now demonstrate that anti-integrin antibody- or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-induced activation of the αGraphicβGraphic integrin on Jurkat cells, as determined by stimulation of adhesion to collagen type I, resulted in an increased amount of calreticulin bound to this integrin. αGraphicβGraphic activation with either anti-βGraphic or anti-αGraphic monoclonal antibodies resulted in a greater amount of calreticulin coimmunoprecipitating with this integrin. Inactivation by neutralizing anti-integrin antibodies abrogated the calreticulin-integrin interaction. A correlation was also found between PMA-induced αGraphicβGraphic activation and the amount of calreticulin bound to this integrin. Furthermore, pretreatment of streptolysin O-permeablized Jurkat cells with an anti-calreticulin antibody resulted in a significant and specific inhibition of the adhesion to collagen type I that could be induced by antibodies to αGraphicβGraphic or by PMA. These data suggest that the active, high affinity form of αGraphicβGraphic binds calreticulin and that calreticulin binding to the αGraphic cytoplasmic domain may be required for stabilizing the high affinity state of this integrin. The data presented here also demonstrate, for the first time, an inducible interaction of an integrin with an intracellular protein that occurs via the α subunit of the integrin.

Footnotes

  • * The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • 1 The abbreviations used are:

    PMA

    phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate

    PIPES

    1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid.

  • 2J. Wilkins, D. Stupack, H. Ni, N. Hunt and C. Shen, manuscript submitted for publication.

  • 3J. Wilkins and D. Stupack, unpublished data.

  • 4J. Wilkins and D. Stupack, unpublished observations.

  • 5M. Coppolino and S. Dedhar, unpublished observations.

    • Received May 15, 1995.
    • Revision received June 21, 1995.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Advertisement