Functional Importance of the Amino Terminus of GGraphic(*)

  1. John R. Hepler(1),
  2. Gloria H. Biddlecome(1),
  3. Christiane Kleuss(1),
  4. Laura A. Camp(2),
  5. Sandra L. Hofmann(2),
  6. Elliott M. Ross(1) and
  7. Alfred G. Gilman(1)(§)
  1. From the (1)Departments of Pharmacology and
  2. (2)Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235
  1. § To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 214-648-2370; Fax: 214-648-8812.

Abstract

GGraphic is palmitoylated at residues Cys9 and CysGraphic. Removal of palmitate from purified GGraphic with palmitoylthioesterase in vitro failed to alter interactions of GGraphic with phospholipase C-β1, the G protein βGraphic subunit complex, or m1 muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Mutants C9A, C10A, C9A/C10A, C9S/C10S, and truncated GGraphic (removal of residues 1-6) were synthesized in Sf9 cells and purified. Loss of both Cys residues or truncation prevented palmitoylation of GGraphic. However, truncated GGraphic and the single Cys mutants activated phospholipase C-β1 normally, while the double Cys mutants were poor activators. Loss of both Cys residues impaired but did not abolish interaction of GGraphic with m1 receptors. These Cys residues are thus important regardless of their state of palmitoylation. When expressed in HEK-293 or Sf9 cells, all of the proteins studied associated entirely or predominantly with membranes, although a minor fraction of nonpalmitoylated GGraphic proteins accumulated in the cytosol of HEK-293 cells. When subjected to TX-114 phase partitioning, a significant fraction of all of the proteins, including those with no palmitate, was found in the detergent-rich phase. Removal of residues 1-34 of GGraphic caused a loss of surface hydrophobicity as evidenced by complete partitioning into the aqueous phase. The Cys residues at the amino terminus of GGraphic are thus important for its interactions with effector and receptor, and the amino terminus conveys a hydrophobic character to the protein distinct from that contributed by palmitate.

Footnotes

  • * This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM34497, American Cancer Society Grant BE30-O, the Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust, and the Raymond and Ellen Willie Chair of Molecular Neuropharmacology (to A. G. G.), American Heart Association, Texas Affiliate Award 94G-112 (to J. R. H.), National Institutes of Health Grant GM30355 and Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant I-0982 (to E. M. R.), and National Institutes of Health Grant CA61823 (to S. L. H.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • 1 The abbreviations used are:

    G proteins

    heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins

    GGraphic

    the α subunit of a G protein

    GGraphic

    the βGraphic subunit complex of a G protein

    GTPGraphicS

    guanosine 5′-3-O-(thio)triphosphate

    HPLC

    high performance liquid chromatography

    BSA

    bovine serum albumin

    PAGE

    polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

    NTA

    nitrilotriacetic acid.

  • 2G. H. Biddlecome, G. Berstein, and E. M. Ross, manuscript in preparation.

  • 3The label from [3H]palmitate associated with cytosolic GGraphic is myristate, not palmitate(10). In the experiment shown in Fig. 1A, GGraphic is visualized as a pair of proteins with apparent molecular masses of 42 and 43 kDa. This is the result of unexpectedly efficient reading of the altered polyhedron initiator codon contained upstream of the inserted GGraphic sequence in the original pVL1393 expression vector(29). This altered initiator codon was placed out of frame with the GGraphic sequence in all subsequent experiments.

  • 4The m1 muscarinic receptor can stimulate nucleotide exchange on GGraphic in the absence of agonist, albeit at a slower rate than that observed in the presence of an agonist such as carbachol(35).

  • 5Much longer exposures reveal that a very small amount of label (<2% of wild type) is incorporated into truncated GGraphic.

  • 6Prior studies (G. H. Biddlecome, G. Berstein, and E. M. Ross, unpublished results) demonstrated that addition of a hexahistidine tag at the carboxyl terminus of GGraphic decreased the capacity of phospholipase C-β1 to stimulate steady-state GTP hydrolysis (i.e. GAP effect) by impairing the interaction of GGraphic with the m1 receptor that is necessary for rapid GDP/GTP exchange. Present studies revealed that nontagged and hexahistadine-tagged GGraphic shared similar rates of agonist-stimulated GTPGraphicS binding, whereas the tagged protein had lower rates of atropine- (basal) and carbachol-stimulated steady-state GTP hydrolysis, accounting for the higher relative level of stimulation by carbachol (Fig. 5; Table 1).

  • 7When subjected to TX-114 phase separation analysis, purified GGraphic-short partitioned predominantly into the detergent phase. Treatment of GGraphic-short with palmitoylthioesterase failed to alter this pattern. These results provide further evidence that GGraphic-short is not palmitoylated.

  • 8P. Sternweis and C. Slaughter, personal communication.

    • Received August 31, 1995.
    • Revision received October 20, 1995.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Advertisement