Arrestin/Clathrin Interaction

LOCALIZATION OF THE ARRESTIN BINDING LOCUS TO THE CLATHRIN TERMINAL DOMAIN*

  1. Oscar B. Goodman, Jr.,
  2. Jason G. Krupnick,
  3. Vsevolod V. Gurevich,
  4. Jeffrey L. Benovic and
  5. James H. Keen§
  1. From the Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, and Microbiology and Immunology, Kimmel Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107

    Abstract

    Previously we demonstrated that nonvisual arrestins exhibit a high affinity interaction with clathrin, consistent with an adaptor function in the internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (Goodman, O. B., Jr., Krupnick, J. G., Santini, F., Gurevich, V. V., Penn, R. B., Gagnon, A. W., Keen, J. H., and Benovic, J. L. (1996) Nature 383, 447–450). In this report we show that a short sequence of highly conserved residues within the globular clathrin terminal domain is responsible for arrestin binding. Limited proteolysis of clathrin cages results in the release of terminal domains and concomitant abrogation of arrestin binding. The nonvisual arrestins, β-arrestin and arrestin3, but not visual arrestin, bind specifically to a glutathioneS-transferase-clathrin terminal domain fusion protein. Deletion analysis and alanine scanning mutagenesis localize the binding site to residues 89–100 of the clathrin heavy chain and indicate that residues 1–100 can function as an independent arrestin binding domain. Site-directed mutagenesis identifies an invariant glutamine (Glu-89) and two highly conserved lysines (Lys-96 and Lys-98) as residues critical for arrestin binding, complementing hydrophobic and acidic residues in arrestin3 which have been implicated in clathrin binding (Krupnick, J. G., Goodman, O. B., Jr., Keen, J. H., and Benovic, J. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15011–15016). Despite exhibiting high affinity clathrin binding, arrestins do not induce coat assembly. The terminal domain is oriented toward the plasma membrane in coated pits, and its binding of both arrestins and AP-2 suggests that this domain is the anchor responsible for adaptor-receptor recruitment to the coated pit.

    Footnotes

    • * This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM-28526 (to J. H. K.), GM-44944 (to J. L. B.), and 5-T32-DK07705-03 (to O. B. G., Jr. and J. G. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Present address: Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ 85372.

    • § To whom correspondence should be addressed: Kimmel Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th St., BLSB 915, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Tel.: 215-503-4624; Fax: 215-923-1098; E-mail:j_keen{at}lac.jci.tju.edu.

    • 1 The abbreviations used are: GPR(s), G protein-coupled receptor(s); TD, terminal domain; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; GST, glutathioneS-transferase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    • 2 F. Santini, R. B. Penn, J. L. Benovic, and J. H. Keen, manuscript in preparation.

      • Received February 12, 1997.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
    • Advertisement
    • Advertisement
    Advertisement