Expression of the Casein Kinase 2 Subunits in Chinese Hamster Ovary and 3T3 L1 Cells Provides Information on the Role of the Enzyme in Cell Proliferation and the Cell Cycle*

In order to investigate the in vivofunctions of protein kinase CK2 (CK2), the expression of Myc-tagged versions of the subunits, Myc-CK2α and Myc-CK2β, was carried out in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO cells) and in 3T3 L1 fibroblasts. Cell proliferation in these cells was examined. CHO cells that transiently overexpressed the Myc-CK2β subunit exhibited a severe growth defect, as shown by a much lower value of [3H]thymidine incorporation than the vector controls, and a rounded shrunken morphology. In contrast, cells overexpressing Myc-tagged CK2α showed a slightly but consistently higher value of [3H]thymidine incorporation than the controls. The defect in cell growth and changes in morphology caused by Myc-CK2β overexpression were partially rescued by coexpression of Myc-tagged CK2α. In parallel to the studies in CHO cells, the stable transfection of Myc-CK2α and Myc-CK2β subunits was achieved in 3T3 L1 fibroblast cells. Similarly, the ectopic expression of Myc-CK2β, but not Myc-CK2α, caused a growth defect. By measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation, it was found that expression of Myc-CK2β prolonged the G1phase and inhibited up-regulation of cyclin D1 expression during G1. In addition, a lower mitotic index and lower mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase activities were detected in Myc-CK2β-expressing cells. Detailed analysis of stable cells that were synchronously released into the cell cycle revealed that the expression of Myc-CK2β inhibited cells entering into mitosis and prevented the activation of mitotic cyclin-dependent kinases. Taken together, results from both transient and stable expression of CK2 subunits strongly suggest that CK2 may be involved in the control of cell growth and progression of the cell cycle.

tural proteins, transcription factors, and proto-oncoproteins (1). The holoenzyme form of CK2 is a heterotetramer, composed of ␣, ␣Ј, and ␤ subunits combined to form ␣ 2 ␤ 2 , ␣␣Ј␤ 2 , and ␣Ј 2 ␤ 2 . The ␣ and ␣Ј subunits are catalytically active, whereas the ␤ subunit is thought to be a regulatory subunit that stimulates the catalytic activity of ␣ or ␣Ј subunits and may also influence substrate specificity (for reviews, see Refs. [1][2][3][4]. CK2 exhibits remarkable evolutionary conservation of primary structure in all eukaryotes from yeast to human, e.g. the identity of amino acid sequences of ␣ and ␤ subunits between human and Drosophila melanogaster is 90 and 88%, respectively. The amino acid sequences of the ␤ subunits of human, pig, and chicken are even identical, underscoring this point (5)(6).
The physiological role of CK2 has been explored in yeast and in a number of mammalian cell types, and these studies suggest that the enzyme is involved in cell growth and progression of the cell cycle. For example, genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and Dictyostelium discoideum (7)(8)(9) showed that CK2 activity is essential for cell viability, e.g. the simultaneous disruption of the genes encoding the catalytic subunits, cka1 and cka2, in S. cerevisiae is lethal (7). An essential role of CK2 in control of cell cycle progression has also been demonstrated in the yeast S. cerevisiae (10). Through the use of mutant strains temperaturesensitive for the CK2 gene, the function of CK2 during the cell cycle was analyzed. It was shown that following a shift to the nonpermissive temperature, the mutant strains arrested within a single cell cycle and showed a dual arrest phenotype consisting of 50% of cells in G 1 and 50% cells in G 2 /M. Further analysis by flow cytometry of pheromone-synchronized cells confirmed that CK2 is required at a point beyond Start in G 1 prior to S phase. Analysis of hydroxyurea-synchronized cells also confirmed that CK2 is needed for cells cycle progression in the G 2 /M phases in yeast (10).
Insofar as the role of CK2 in growth-related functions in mammalian cells is concerned, it has been shown that microinjection of antibodies directed against the ␤ subunit inhibits cell cycle progression in response to serum stimulation in human IMR-90 cells (11). CK2 antisense treatment was found to inhibit cell growth stimulation (12) and block neuritogenesis in neuroblastoma cells (13). In experiments with a transgenic CK2␣ mouse model, the expression of CK2␣, even when seen only at the mRNA level, caused a high predisposition for lymphoma formation, and coexpression with c-Myc resulted in the rapid development of leukemia (14).
The importance of CK2 on cell growth and cell cycle progression is also suggested by structural analysis of the enzyme and by the fact that a number of CK2 substrates are growth-and cell cycle-related (4,21). The catalytic subunits of CK2, ␣, and ␣Ј, which are highly homologous, are closely related to the p34 cdc2 family, whose activities are required for G 1 /S and G 2 /M transitions in the cell cycle (15). In addition, both types of subunits of CK2, i.e. the ␣ and ␤ subunits, can be phosphorylated by p34 cdc2 in vitro and in intact cells during mitosis (16 -18). Furthermore, p34 cdc2 itself can be phosphorylated by CK2 (19). Cyclin B1, which binds to and activates p34 cdc2 during mitosis, appears to be phosphorylated by CK2 at the sites that regulate its translocation during mitosis (20).
Despite the numerous findings that suggest a role for CK2 in the control of cell growth, direct evidence obtained by overexpression of this enzyme in cells is still lacking; it has only been previously overexpressed in COS cells, a cell line that normally would not show any phenotype. In the present study, the transient overexpression of the epitope-tagged CK2 subunits, Myc-CK2␣ and Myc-CK2␤, in CHO cells and development of stable cell lines in 3T3 L1 fibroblasts has been achieved. To our knowledge, this is the first paper reporting the successful exogenous expression of CK2 in mammalian cell lines other than COS cells. In both cell systems, it was found that the expression of Myc-CK2␤ caused severe impairment of growth. An analysis of the 3T3 L1/Myc-CK2␤ stable cell lines showed that similar to what was observed in yeast (10), the growth inhibition appears to be linked to defects in the progression of the cell cycle.

Antibodies
Polyclonal anti-Myc antibody A-14, monoclonal anti-cyclin B1 antibody GNS1, rabbit polyclonal anti-cyclin A antibody C-19, and rabbit polyclonal anti-cyclin D1 antibody H295 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Monoclonal anti-Myc antibody 9E10 was a gift from Dr. J. A. Cooper (University of Washington, Seattle). Polyclonal anti-CK2␣ and -␤ antisera were raised against synthetic peptides and were employed in our study as described elsewhere (24). Monoclonal anti-cdc2 antibody was from Transduction Laboratories. Monoclonal MPM2 antibody, which was raised against phosphoproteins during mitosis, was from Upstate Biotechnology.

Cell Culture, Transfection, and Preparation of Cell Lysates
Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO cells) were cultured in 150-mm plates containing F10 medium with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and grown to confluency. A day prior to the transfection, the cells were trypsinized and plated after a one to two dilution and were allowed to grow for another 24 h. For transfection, the cells were trypsinized, washed by centrifugation with growth medium followed by phosphatebuffered saline (PBS), resuspended in 0.5 ml of PBS, pH 7.4 (Life Technologies, Inc.), and transfected by electroporation (Gene Pulser, Bio-Rad) at 0.35 kV and 926 microfarads. After electroporation, 1 ml of growth medium was added quickly, and the cells were plated. Twelve h later, the medium was changed, and cells were grown for another 24 -36 h before being harvested by sonication in Buffer A (50 mM ␤-glycerol phosphate, pH 7.3, 20 M vanadate, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 g/ml leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Transfection of CHO cells by using Lipofectin Reagent was also performed following a protocol from Life Technologies, Inc.
3T3 L1 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FCS. Twenty-four h before the transfection, the cells were plated on a 100-mm plate at a density of 0.5 ϫ 10 6 cells/plate. A standard calcium phosphate coprecipitation method was used for transfection. Twenty-four h after the transfection, the cells were cultured in the presence of 800 g/ml G418 (Calbiochem). After 2 weeks, the clones were picked and grown in the same medium in the presence of 600 g/ml G418. To harvest cells, they were washed with PBS and lysed by sonication in Buffer A containing 0.1 M NaCl and 0.25% Triton X-100.

Cell Synchronization
Stable cell lines of 3T3 L1/Myc-␣ and 3T3 L1/Myc-␤ were seeded at a density of 2.5 ϫ 10 5 cells/150-mm plate in DMEM with 10% FCS (full medium). After 24 h, the cells were washed with PBS and then starved in DMEM containing 0.1% FCS for 48 h to synchronize cells in G 0 . Re-entry into the G 1 phase of cell cycle was initiated by replacement of the starvation medium with the full medium. For analysis of the G 2 /M phase, the cells were first starved at G 0 and then synchronized to the G 1 /S boundary by culturing in full medium and 1 g/ml aphidicolin (Sigma) for 18 h. After extensive washing, the cells were cultured in full medium and harvested at different time intervals.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting of the Myc-tagged CK2 Subunits
Monoclonal anti-Myc antibody 9E10 (10 g) was added to 400 l of crude cell lysates containing approximately 1 mg/ml total protein. The mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Then 40 l of a mixture of protein A-Sepharose (Sigma) and protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (1:1, 50% slurry) was added, and incubation was continued for another 90 min. The beads were spun down and washed 4 times by centrifugation in a wash buffer containing 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, and 2 mM EDTA. The immunoprecipitated Myc-CK2 proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and detected by immunoblotting with 9E10 hybridoma supernatant.

Cell Counting
The rate of stable clones of CK2 transfected 3T3 cells proliferation was measured by counting the number of cells after cells were plated. Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 2500 cells/35-mm plate, with duplicate plates for each cell line. Every 24 h, the cells were trypsinized and counted using a hemocytometer (25).

[ 3 H]Thymidine Incorporation
For CHO cells, after electroporation, cells were seeded in 6-well/ 35-mm plates at a density of one-tenth of the total transfected cells per well. At 12 h after transfection, the transfection medium was removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS and cultured in fresh medium (2 ml) containing 1 Ci/ml [methyl-3 H]thymidine 5Ј-triphosphate (NEN Life Science Products) for another 24 h. To eliminate the possibility that the cell density between plates might be different after transfection, which could cause variations in the value of 3 H incorporation, two extra plates were plated and used to count the cell number for each transfection at the time when [ 3 H]thymidine was added. For harvesting cells, the growth medium containing [ 3 H]thymidine was removed, and the cells were then washed twice with PBS. The cells were rinsed twice with 2 ml of ice-cold 5% trichloroacetic acid and lysed by incubation in 1.5 ml of 0.25 M NaOH for 15 min at room temperature. 0.6 ml of lysates was used for counting [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation.
Stable cell lines of 3T3 L1/Myc-␣ and 3T3 L1/Myc-␤ were plated using 35-mm/6-well plates at a density of 5 ϫ 10 4 cells/plate. After 24 h, the cells were starved for 36 h in 2 ml of DMEM containing 0.1% FCS, followed by growing in 10% FCS medium containing 1 Ci/ml [ 3 H]thymidine for 18 h. The cells were harvested at various time points and 3 H incorporation was measured as described for CHO cells. For all of the experiments, duplicate plates were used and mean values were taken.

Kinase Assays
Histone H1 Kinase Assay-The cyclin B1-associated p34 cdc2 and the cyclin A-associated CDKs were co-immunoprecipitated from stable cell lines of 3T3 L1/Myc-␣ and 3T3 L1/Myc-␤ using the anti-cyclin B1 antibody, GNS1, and the anti-cyclin A antibody C-19, respectively. The CDK activities were measured using histone H1 (Sigma) as the substrate. Briefly, for asynchronized cells, the actively growing cells (60 -70% confluent) were harvested and lysed by sonication in Buffer A. Then 500 l of the crude cell lysates (1 mg of protein/ml of lysate) was incubated with either 1 g of the anti-cyclin B1 antibody or the anticyclin A antibody for 3 h at 4°C. After this, 40 l (50% slurry) of protein G-Sepharose (for cyclin B1 immunoprecipitates) or protein A-Sepharose (for cyclin A immunoprecipitates) was added and incubated for another 90 min. The immunoprecipitates were washed once with lysis buffer and three times with a wash buffer containing 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 0.25 M NaCl, 10 mM MnCl 2 , and 1 mM DTT. Reactions were initiated by addition of 30 l of an assay buffer containing 4 g of histone H1, 20 mM MgCl 2 , 7 mM MnCl 2 , 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM [␥-32 P]ATP (2000 cpm/pmol ATP). The reactions were carried out for 30 min in an incubator shaker at 37°C and then stopped by addition of Laemmli sample buffer. 2 Phosphorylation of histone H1 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Cells that were starved for 24 h by growth in a medium containing 0.1% FCS were used as a negative control.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy
CHO cells that were transfected with the Myc-tagged CK2 constructs were seeded onto a 60-mm plate. At 24 h after transfection the cells were washed with PBS and fixed with Ϫ20°C methanol for 5 min. The fixed cells were blocked with a TBST buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween) containing 5% goat serum for 1 h and then incubated overnight in blocking buffer containing a monoclonal anti-Myc antibody 9E10 (final concentration ϭ 4.5 g/ml). The plates were then washed six times with TBST and incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary anti-mouse antibody (BioSource International, 1:1000 dilution) for 2 h. After washing five times with TBST, the plates were viewed using a Nikon Diaphot-TMD Inverted fluorescent microscope (28). The percentage of cells in elongated or rounded shape was determined for both the Myc-positive and Mycnegative (untransfected) populations. For determination of mitotic cells in 3T3 L1 stable clones, the same fixing and staining procedures were applied by using a monoclonal MPM2 antibody as the primary antibody. The percentage of mitotic cells was determined by counting MPM2positive cells under the microscope.

Transient Overexpression of Myc-CK2␤ Subunit in CHO Cells Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Results in an Abnormal
Cell Morphology-CHO cells were transiently transfected either with plasmids of each of the epitope-tagged CK2 subunits alone, pcDNA3/Myc-CK2␣ and pcDNA3/Myc-CK2␤, or cotransfected with both subunits. The vector plasmid pcDNA3 was used as a control. In this system, by electroporation under the condition specified, the transfection efficiency was found to be greater than 50% as determined using the green fluorescence protein plasmid or by anti-Myc antibody immunostaining (data not shown). At 36 -48 h after transfection, cells were harvested, and the overexpression of CK2 was detected by CK2 kinase assays (26,27) and by immunoblotting using anti-CK2␣ and anti-CK2␤ antisera raised against the C-terminal peptides of each subunit of human CK2 (23). As illustrated in Fig. 1A, the Myc-tagged CK2 subunits migrated slower than the endogenous CK2 proteins on SDS-PAGE due to the Myc epitope. The approximate size for Myc-CK2␣ and Myc-CK2␤ is 60 and 44 kDa, respectively. Each Myc-CK2 subunit was strongly overexpressed in this system, with a more than 5-fold increase over the endogenous level of non-tagged protein. Cotransfection of Myc-CK2␣ with Myc-CK2␤ also gave good expression of each subunit (Fig. 1A). To examine if the overexpressed Myc-CK2 proteins were enzymatically active, the CK2 activities in lysates of cells that were transfected with Myc-CK2 subunits or cotransfected with combinations of them were determined using a peptide substrate, RRRDDDSDDD. An appreciably higher CK2 activity was detected in cells that were transfected with the Myc-CK2␣ than in cells that were transfected with pcDNA3 vector alone, showing that the overexpressed recombinant CK2␣ was active (Fig. 1B). A further activation of CK2 was detected when cells were cotransfected with Myc-CK2␣ and Myc-CK2␤, implying that the Myc-tagged subunits are capable of combining to give holoenzyme forms that exhibit higher activities than that obtained with the free tagged CK2␣ subunits (Fig. 1B).
One distinctive phenotypic change observed for cells that were transfected with the Myc-CK2␤ construct was that they had a slower proliferation rate than the non-transfected controls. It took an additional 24 h for Myc-CK2␤-expressing cells to reach confluence as compared with vector controls or Myc-CK2␣-expressing cells. To examine the proliferation rate quantitatively, the relative levels of DNA synthesis were monitored by measuring [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation. As anticipated, there were reproducible differences between cells that were transfected with Myc-CK2␤ and vector controls; the cells that were transfected with Myc-CK2␤ clearly showed values of [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation that were approximately 50% of the vector control (Fig. 1C). Since the transfection efficiency was approximately 50%, it is likely that the Myc-CK2␤ expressing cells were not incorporating thymidine at all. Transfection of cells with Myc-CK2␣ resulted in slightly higher values of [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation (approximately 20% higher) than the cells transfected with pcDNA3 vector alone. Transfection of these cells with Myc-CK2␤ again depressed [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation but not to the levels reached with Myc-CK2␤ transfection without cotransfection of the ␣ subunit (Fig. 1C).
The slow growing cells transfected with Myc-CK2␤ also showed changes in morphology. In the normal growing state, CHO cells exhibit a flat, elongated morphology, which allows them to become attached to the plate and proliferate. After transfection with the vector or with the Myc-CK2␣, the cells fully recovered from the shock caused by electroporation within 24 h and resumed their normal morphology. However, with the expression of exogenous Myc-CK2␤, a large population of cells had a rounded appearance, consistent with the morphology of growth-arrested cells. To further extend these observations, an immunostaining technique was applied using anti-Myc antibody with cells that had been transfected with the various Myc-tagged CK2 constructs. The percentages of cells in rounded or elongated shape were determined microscopically. In this case, most of the cells that overexpressed Myc-CK2␤ showed the round shape, whereas only a small fraction of the cells that overexpressed Myc-CK2␣ exhibited this morphology ( Fig. 2 A and B). Cotransfection of CK2␣ with CK2␤ partially rescued this phenotype. To exclude further the possibility that the observed phenotype could be introduced by this specific transfection technique (electroporation), a different transfection method, lipofection, was applied. Similar results were obtained (data not shown).
Of interest was the fact that in many ways the rounded cells overexpressing CK2␤ exhibited morphologic changes that occur in apoptosis. They had a shrunken appearance and eventually died. At 48 h after transfection, by co-staining with anti-Myc antibody and DNA staining with Hoechst dye, most of Myc-CK2␤ expressing cells were observed to exhibit chromosomal condensation and fragmentation, which is characteristic of apoptotic cell death (data not shown). On the other hand, very few cells that overexpressed Myc-CK2␣ showed such changes in the cell nuclei.
The Stable Ectopic Expression of Myc-CK2␤ Subunit in 3T3 L1 Cells Inhibits Cell Proliferation-In order to study long term cellular effects of expressing CK2 subunits, the stable expression of Myc-CK2␤ and Myc-CK2␣ was carried out using 3T3 L1 fibroblasts. After transfection of cells with the Myctagged CK2 subunits, multiple clones were examined for expression of proteins. Two approaches were applied as follows: one was by immunoblotting of crude cell lysates with anti-Myc antibody or anti-CK2 antibodies and another was by immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc antibody followed by immunoblotting with either anti-Myc antibody or with CK2 subunit antibodies. With the first method it was questionable whether or not the Myc-tagged CK2 subunits could even be seen regardless of which type of immunoblotting was employed, although the endogenous subunits were readily apparent, i.e. the blotting with anti-CK2 subunit antibodies (Fig. 3A). However, when initial immunoprecipitations were carried out, the expression of Myc-tagged CK2␣ and CK2␤ subunits was detectable (Fig.  3B). Multiple clones were examined, and 10 clones, 3 express-ing Myc-CK2␣ at different levels and 7 expressing Myc-CK2␤, again at different levels, were selected for further study ( Fig.  3B and Table I). For the most part, these studies made use of clones ␣ 12 , ␣ 13 , ␤ 3 , and ␤ 6 , with clones ␤ 3 and ␣ 12 representative of the highest and clones ␣ 13 and ␤ 6 representative of a lower level of expression ( Fig. 3B and Table I). Cells that were stably transfected with pcDNA3 vector were used as a control. The enzymatic activity of CK2 in these cells was also examined using a specific CK2 peptide substrate, RRRDDDSDDD. No significant change of CK2 activity was detected in any of these cell lines, consistent with the concept that the total concentration of CK2␣-tagged plus untagged underwent very little change as a result of the expression of the Myc-tagged subunits.
The proliferation rates of the Myc-CK2␣-and Myc-CK2␤expressing cell lines and pcDNA3 vector control cells were examined under normal growth conditions (10% FCS) by counting cell numbers. For this, the cells were seeded at a very low density and allowed to grow for 8 days. Every 24 h cells were trypsinized and counted. All of the CK2␤ clones examined showed a slower growth rate than the vector control cells. This is illustrated in Fig. 4 for clone ␤ 3 , which had the highest expression level of Myc-␤, and for clone ␤ 6 , which had the lowest expression level. In contrast, Myc-CK2␣ transfectants showed a normal growth rate as compared with the vector control (Fig. 4).
Consistent with the observed growth inhibition, the ␤-ex- pressing cells tended to lose the expression of the exogenous gene with passage number. For example, after 15 passages, the expression of Myc-CK2␤ could not be detected even in the ␤ 3 clone. These cells fully reverted to the normal growth phenotype (data not shown). In contrast, no obvious decrease in the expression of recombinant CK2␣ was detected. Therefore, all the data presented here were obtained from cells of early passages (less than 10 passages).
The Expression of Myc-CK2␤ in 3T3 L1 Cells Prolongs the G 1 Phase Cell Cycle Progression and Negatively Regulates Cyclin D1 Expression-Since a slower growth rate was observed for the CK2␤-expressing cells, flow cytometric analysis (FACS) was employed to determine whether there was any dysregulation in cell cycle progression. As illustrated in Table II, for actively growing asynchronized cells, both parental 3T3 L1 cells and the pcDNA3 vector control cells exhibited similar FACS profiles, with approximately 30% of cells in G 1 phase and 30% cells in G 2 /M phase. However, the ␤ clones showed very different profiles. For clones examined, accumulation of G 2 /M peak was seen with the increasing expression level of Myc-CK2␤. For ␤ 3 and ␤ 6 , while ␤ 6 cells behaved more or less like the control cells, a much higher percentage of ␤ 3 cells was in the G 2 /M peak. This strong G 2 /M peak was not changed even after the cells were starved for 48 h (data not shown). This makes it very difficult to analyze further the effect of CK2␤ expression on cell cycle progression by FACS. Therefore, we had to perform other experiments, including [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation and CDK assay, etc., to do cell cycle analysis.
Consistent with what was observed in the cell counting experiment (Fig. 4), [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation assay for stable clones v, ␣ 12 , ␣ 13 , ␤ 3 , and ␤ 6 also demonstrated a slower proliferation rate for Myc-CK2␤ cells. The values of [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation by ␤ 3 and ␤ 6 were much lower than that of the vector cells or the two Myc-CK2␣ cells (Fig. 5A). Since the cells started in G 0 , and the serum-stimulated [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation occurs when cells are in S phase of cell cycle, the  Table I. B, detection of Myc-tagged CK2 subunits in 3T3 L1 fibroblasts by immunoprecipitation. Myc-CK2␣ and Myc-CK2␤ were immunoprecipitated using a monoclonal anti-Myc antibody 9E10 and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting by use of the same antibody. The pcDNA3-transfected clone v was used as control in each case.  4. Expression of the Myc-tagged CK2␤ protein inhibits cell proliferation. Stable clones, v, ␣ 12 , ␣ 13 , ␤ 3 , and ␤ 6 , were plated at low density and cultured in 10% FCS medium. Cell proliferation was examined by cell counting as described under "Experimental Procedures." For each time point, duplicate plates were used, and an average was recorded. decreased thymidine incorporation in the ␤-clones suggested a possible G 1 arrest. An analysis of the kinetics of cell cycle progression from G 0 to G 1 and then to S phase was carried out by measuring the time course of [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation. The results for clones v and ␤ 3 are shown in Fig. 5B. In this experiment, cells were starved for 48 h and then stimulated with 10% FCS in the presence of [ 3 H]thymidine and harvested at different time intervals thereafter. For the vector control cells, there was a significant increase of [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation starting at approximately 16 h after serum stimulation, indicating that cells were starting to enter S phase. This entry into S phase was confirmed by the appearance of peaks with a DNA content greater than 2 N by flow cytometric analysis (data not shown). Expression of Myc-CK2␤ delayed entry into S phase by approximately 2 h (Fig. 5B). Similar results were observed for other the Myc-CK2␤ clones (data not shown).
One of the key regulators for G 1 progression in mammalian cells is cyclin D1, which associates with and activates CDK4/ CDK6 activity in late G 1 phase in proliferating cells. We examined whether the level of cyclin D1 in actively growing asynchronous cells was affected by the expression of Myc-CK2 subunits. As shown in Fig. 6A, there was a clear reduction of cyclin D1 expression in both ␤ 3 and ␤ 6 as well as other Myc-CK2␤-expressing clones (data not shown) as compared with the vector control and the Myc-CK2␣ clones, ␣ 12 and ␣ 13 (Fig. 6A). The effect of expressing Myc-CK2␤ on cyclin D1 levels was also seen when synchronized cells were used in the study. In these experiments cells were subjected to serum starvation in order to arrest them in G 0 and were then stimulated with serum to enter the G 1 phase. The level of cyclin D1 at different time intervals after serum stimulation was examined (Fig. 6B). In vector control cells, the expression of cyclin D1 was very low in quiescent cells but increased appreciably after stimulation (4fold by 14 h). However, expression of Myc-CK2␤ inhibited the serum-stimulated up-regulation of cyclin D1, with only a small increase of cyclin D1 expression after 14 h (1.1-fold). In contrast to what was seen with Myc-CK2␤, the expression of Myc-CK2␣ did not suppress the up-regulation of cyclin D1 expression (data not shown).

The Expression of Myc-CK2␤ in 3T3 L1 Fibroblasts Reduces Mitotic Index and Mitotic CDK Activities in Asynchronous
Cells-To help clarify the cell cycle changes that occurred in Myc-CK2 subunit-expressing cells, the percentage of cells in mitosis (mitotic index) was determined by immunostaining using a mitotic-specific monoclonal antibody, MPM2. The results are shown in Fig. 7A. Compared with vector control cells, the Myc-␤-expressing cell lines had a significantly lower number of mitotic cells, whereas Myc-␣-expressing cells had a slightly higher number of mitotic cells. The percentage of the mitotic cells counted for the vector control cells was approximately double that for ␤ 3 and also significantly higher than for ␤ 6 ; a lower number of mitotic cells were also seen with the other ␤ clones, suggesting that the CK2␤-expressing cells might have difficulty in entering mitosis.
As is widely recognized, the activation of the p34 cdc2 -cyclin B1 complex is a hallmark of mitosis. Together with the p34 cdc2cyclin B1 complex, activation of the p34 cdc2 -cyclin A complex also promotes cell entry into mitosis. In order to understand further the mechanism of the possible mitotic defect caused by the ectopic expression of CK2␤, the mitotic CDK activities associated with cyclin B1 and cyclin A in asynchronous cells were measured. The cyclin B1 and cyclin A proteins were each immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates, and the activities of the associated CDKs were assayed using histone H1 as a substrate. Clones ␤ 3 and ␤ 6 showed reduced cyclin B1-associated Cdc2 and cyclin A-associated CDK activities as compared with the vector control and the two CK2␣ clones (Fig. 7B). In contrast to the CK2␤ cell lines, the CK2␣ cell lines exhibited similar or perhaps slightly higher mitotic CDK activities.
The Expression of the Myc-CK2␤ in 3T3 L1 Cells Reduces the Percentage of Mitotic Cells and Mitotic CDK Activities in Synchronized Cells-Since a G 1 arrest was suggested in the CK2␤ cells, a G 2 /M phase cell synchronization procedure was performed to determine whether the lower mitotic index and the reduced mitotic CDK activities observed for asynchronous Myc-CK2␤-expressing cells might also be contributed to by a G 2 arrest. For this study, cells were blocked at the G 1 /S boundary using the DNA synthesis inhibitor, aphidicolin. After the removal of aphidicolin, cells enter into S phase synchronously and progress through G 2 and M phases. Cells were harvested  at different times, and the percentage of mitotic cells was determined by counting cells that stained positively with MPM2 antibody. As illustrated in Fig. 8A, the percentage of MPM2-positive cells was the highest 8 h after the removal of aphidicolin for both vector controls (v) and the ␤ 3 clone. The clone ␤ 3 exhibited a much lower percentage of mitotic cells throughout the time course. Detailed analysis of the cyclin B1-associated p34 cdc2 activities and cyclin A-associated CDK activities for stable clones v and ␤ 3 were carried out for the synchronized cells (Fig. 8, B and C). Consistent with the MPM-2 cell-staining data, the expression of Myc-CK2␤ resulted in lower p34 cdc2 /cyclin B1 activity (Fig. 8B) and inhibited the activation of CDK/cyclin A activity (Fig. 8C). Almost no activation of CDK/cyclin A was observed for ␤ 3 after aphidicolin was removed and the cells entered mitosis (Fig. 8C). DISCUSSION The role of CK2 in the control of cell growth and cell cycle progression has been suggested by a number of studies in yeast (reviewed in Ref. 4), but direct evidence for such a role in mammalian cells is lacking due to the difficulty of expressing this enzyme in cells. In this paper, for the first time, we report the successful expression of epitope-tagged CK2 subunits in two cell lines by transient (in CHO cells) and stable expression (in 3T3 L1 cells) methods, and we have studied the effects of the individual subunits on proliferation and cell cycle progression. Results using both systems support each other; expression of Myc-CK2␤ caused growth inhibition and abnormal cell morphology, but expression of Myc-CK2␣ resulted either in slightly higher (in CHO cells) or had no significant effect on cell growth (in 3T3 L1 cells). The growth inhibition caused by Myc-CK2␤ expression was not due to the Myc epitope, since the same phenotype was also observed in both cell lines that were transfected with an untagged pcDNA3/CK2␤ plasmid 3 and, as noted above, was not seen in cells that expressed Myc-CK2␣. This finding was similar to the work reported earlier in S. pombe (29), in which overexpression of ckb1, the S. pombe CK2␤ subunit, inhibited cell growth and cytokinesis. It was of considerable interest that the growth changes observed in the 3T3 L1 cells expressing Myc-CK2␤ occurred even though the expression levels were very low as compared with endogenous subunit concentrations. It should be noted, however, that changes in the concentration of the total amount of CK2␣ and CK2␤ (tagged and endogenous) would have to be more than 1-2% to be detectable.
By further analysis of the stably transfected CK2 cells, it was found that the slow proliferation caused by the expression of recombinant Myc-CK2␤ appears to be linked to defects in cell cycle progression. Examination of the DNA synthesis in CK2␤ clones revealed decreased values of [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation when quiescent cells were stimulated with serum to reentered into G 1 phase and then progressed into S phase. Expression of the CK2␤ subunit delayed entry into S phase for at least 2 to 3 h. Moreover, loss of serum-induced cyclin D1 expression in CK2␤ clones was also correlated with G 1 growth arrest. It is well established that accumulation of cyclin D1 in G 1 in response to mitogen is required for progression through the restriction point and entry into S phase. Therefore, the growth inhibition caused by CK2␤ expression appeared to affect cells in the G 1 phase at a time before the restriction point.
In addition to the G 1 effect, a lower mitotic index and reduced mitotic CDK activities were found in asynchronous Myc-CK2␤-expressing cells. This could also result from growth defect in G 1 phase. However, by applying a G 2 /M phase cell synchronization procedure, in which cells were synchronously progressed through S phase then G 2 and M phases, a lower mitotic index and reduced mitotic CDK activities in ␤ 3 and FIG. 6. Expression of the Myc-CK2␤ subunit affects the expression level of cyclin D1. A, Myc-CK2␤ cells have reduced level of cyclin D1 expression. Actively growing cells were harvested, and cell lysates were prepared. Expression of cyclin D1 was examined using a polyclonal rabbit anti-cyclin D1 antibody H295 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Endogenous CK2␣ expression was determined using a polyclonal anti-CK2␣ antibody to ensure equal loading. B, expression of CK2␤ inhibited up-regulation of cyclin D1 expression during G 1 phase in synchronized ␤ 3 cells. Cells were synchronized to G 0 by starvation and then stimulated with 10% FCS medium. After 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 h, cells were harvested and examined for the expression of cyclin D1.

FIG. 7. Asynchronous Myc-CK2␤ clones exhibit reduced mitotic index and mitotic CDK activities.
A, percent mitotic cells for asynchronized stable Myc-CK2␣ and Myc-CK2␤ clones. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed with methanol, and stained with a mitoticspecific monoclonal antibody (anti-MPM2). The percentage of mitotic cells was determined by microscopically counting MPM2-positive cells in several random microscopic fields. Average data were taken from at least three plates for each clone, and standard errors were calculated. B, change of the mitotic CDK activities in asynchronous Myc-CK2expressing cells. Cyclin B1 and cyclin A were immunoprecipitated from the lysates of actively growing cells: v, ␤ 3 , ␤ 6 , ␣ 12 , and ␣ 13 . The cyclin B1-associated p34 cdc2 activity and the cyclin A-associated CDK activities were determined using histone H1 as the substrate by mixing 4 g of histone H1 and 25 l of [␥-32 P]ATP with the immunoprecipitates and incubating at 37°C for 30 min. Phosphorylation of histone H1 by CDKs was analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
other ␤ clones were also seen. This may indicate that the expression of CK2␤ caused a defect in cell mitosis. It appears that the expression of Myc-CK2␤ has an effect on cell cycle progression at two points, G 1 and G 2 /M, a similar result as had been obtained in yeast (10).
Several hypotheses can be proposed to explain the effect of growth inhibition and cell cycle changes observed in the Myc-CK2␤-expressing cells. First, CK2␤ appears to be important for substrate specificity of the CK2␣ subunit (4). Many CK2 substrates interact with the holoenzyme through its ␤ subunit, e.g. p53 (30), DNA topoisomerase II (31), and the nucleolar protein Nopp140 (32). A number of proteins are CK2 targets during cell cycle progression, including several cytoskeletal proteins, whose phosphorylation by CK2 might contribute to the structural rearrangements underlying mitosis, and some transcription factors that might be important for the transcription of cell cycle-related proteins (33,34). Disruption of CK2 activity in budding yeast S. cerevisiae resulted in accumulation of cells at both G 1 and G 2 /M phases (10). Likewise, expression of Myc-CK2␤ also caused a similar phenotype as that which occurred in yeast when CK2 activity was disrupted. It is possible that Myc-CK2␤ may interfere with the activity of the holoenzyme by competing for binding to important CK2 substrates that are critical for cell cycle progression. However, in this model, a perplexing question is why such a very small amount of the exogenously expressed Myc-CK2␤ protein in 3T3 L1 cells could function as dominant negative of CK2 so efficiently.
The possibility exists that CK2␤ itself functions independently of the holoenzyme by modulating the activities of certain proteins whose activities are important for cell cycle progression. One example is seen in oocytes, in which CK2␤ interacts with c-Mos and inhibits its activity (22,35). Also it has been demonstrated that CK2␤ can interact with a-Raf and modify its activity (36,37). However, it is not clear whether there are and how many non-holoenzyme forms of CK2␤ exist in vivo, although the asymmetric expression of CK2␤ in some tumors has been reported (38). Based on the finding of Lü scher and Litchfield (39), it appears that the CK2␤ is the first CK2 subunit to be synthesized and that it is then degraded quickly if it does not associate with CK2␣. Indeed, in the baculovirus-infected insect system, the expression of CK2␤ alone is difficult, apparently due to its rapid degradation. Good production of the CK2␤ in the baculovirus system can be achieved, however, by co-infec-tion of CK2␣/␣Ј. 3 Even in our stable expression system using 3T3 L1 cells, a rapid decrease in the expression levels of the recombinant Myc-CK2␤ with increasing cell passage number has also been observed. Therefore, control of the cellular level of the free CK2␤ protein may be a key in regulating the relative levels of CK2 subunits, and this change of CK2␤ level might be cell cycle-regulated.
A third explanation for the effects of expressed Myc-CK2␤ is that it is possible that there is a very small amount of monomeric CK2␣/␣Ј inside the cell that has a critical role in the control of cell growth. If the free form of CK2␣ is growthpromoting, then expression of small amounts of exogenous CK2␤ could neutralize the free ␣, causing a defect in cell growth. This mechanism is highly favored from our work based upon the observation that such a very small amount of the exogenously expressed CK2␤ protein functions efficiently in inhibiting cell growth in 3T3 L1 cells. Furthermore, it is also suggested from the observation that transient expression of CK2␣ increased the proliferation rate of CHO cells and that coexpression of CK2␣ and CK2␤ in CHO cells only partially rescued the growth inhibition of Myc-CK2␤, although the level of CK2 holoenzyme was very high.
Since CK2 is always found as a tetramer under preparative conditions, the critical question still remains as whether or not the free subunits exist inside cells. In fact, the existence of free CK2␣ has been demonstrated in several organism, such as in Zea mays (40), D. discoideum (9), and possibly in mammalian cells (41). The growth-promoting function of the free CK2␣ form has also been documented. Drosophila CK2␣, which does not bind to yeast CK2␤, rescues the yeast mutant cell in which both CK2 catalytic subunits, cka1 and cka2, were disrupted (7). Transgenic mice overexpressing CK2␣ exhibit an increased chance of tumorigenesis (14). Although the holoenzyme CK2 displays a higher catalytic activity toward most commonly used substrates such as casein, the RRRDDDSDDD peptide, and others, there are a few examples that monomeric CK2␣ can be more active toward certain substrates, such as calmodulin. Tetrameric CK2 does not phosphorylate calmodulin under normal phosphorylation conditions, whereas monomeric CK2␣ phosphorylates it efficiently (42,43). It is possible that there are other growth-related proteins that are better substrates of free CK2␣ subunit than for the holoenzyme. The identification of such substrates for CK2␣ subunit might provide useful in- FIG. 8. Expression of the Myc-CK2␤ subunit affects cell mitosis in synchronized cells. Stable clones v and ␤ 3 were plated at low density, starved for 48 h, and synchronized to the G 1 /S boundary by culturing in medium containing 10% FCS and 1 g/ml aphidicolin for 18 h. After extensive washing, the cells were cultured in fresh medium and were then either fixed or harvested at different time intervals. The fixed cells were stained with the MPM2 antibody, and the percentage of mitotic cells were determined by counting MPM2-positive cells microscopically (A). The cyclin B1-associated p34 cdc2 activities (B) and cyclin A-associated CDK activities (C) at different time point were measured for immunoprecipitates of cyclin B1 or cyclin A using histone H1 as the substrate (see "Experimental Procedures"). Histone H1 phosphorylation by CDKs illustrated as percent volume from densitometer readings was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
formation as to targets of the enzyme critical in its role in control of cell cycle progression.