A Context-dependent ClpX Recognition Determinant Located at the C Terminus of Phage Mu Repressor*

  1. Hiroshi Nakai
  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D. C. 20057
  1. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, P. O. Box 571455, Washington, D. C. 20057-1421. Tel.: 202-687-1442; Fax: 202-687-7186; E-mail: nakai{at}bc.georgetown.edu.

Abstract

The bacteriophage Mu immunity repressor is a conformationally sensitive sensor that can be interconverted between forms resistant to and sensitive to degradation by ClpXP protease. Protease-sensitive repressor molecules with an altered C-terminal sequence promote rapid degradation of the wild-type repressor by inducing its C-terminal end to become exposed. Here we determined that the last 5 C-terminal residues (CTD5) of the wild-type repressor contain the motif required for recognition by the ClpX molecular chaperone, a motif that is strongly dependent upon the context in which it is presented. Although attachment of the 11-residue ssrA degradation tag to the C terminus of green fluorescent protein (GFP) promoted its rapid degradation by ClpXP, attachment of 5-27 C-terminal residues of the repressor failed to promote degradation. Disordered peptides derived from 41 and 35 C-terminal residues of CcdA (CcdA41) and thioredoxin (TrxA35), respectively, activated CTD5 when placed as linkers between GFP and repressor C-terminal sequences. However, when the entire thioredoxin sequence was included as a linker to promote an ordered configuration of the TrxA35 peptide, the resulting substrate was not degraded. In addition, a hybrid tag, in which CTD5 replaced the 3-residue recognition motif of the ssrA tag, was inactive when attached directly to GFP but active when attached through the CcdA41 peptide. Thus, CTD5 is sufficient to act as a recognition motif but has requirements for its presentation not shared by the ssrA tag. We suggest that activation of CTD5 may require presentation on a disordered or flexible domain that confers ligand flexibility.

  • Received August 7, 2003.
  • Revision received October 6, 2003.
Table of Contents

Submit your work to JBC.

You'll be in good company.