Distinct Signaling Functions for Shc Isoforms in the Heart*

Thrombin activates protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) and engages signaling pathways that influence the growth and survival of cardiomyocytes as well as extracellular matrix remodeling by cardiac fibroblasts. This study examines the role of Shc proteins in PAR-1-dependent signaling pathways that influence ventricular remodeling. We show that thrombin increases p46Shc/p52Shc phosphorylation at Tyr239/Tyr240 and Tyr317 (and p66Shc-Ser36 phosphorylation) via a pertussis toxin-insensitive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) transactivation pathway in cardiac fibroblasts; p66Shc-Ser36 phosphorylation is via a MEK-dependent mechanism. In contrast, cardiac fibroblasts express β2-adrenergic receptors that activate ERK through a pertussis toxin-sensitive EGFR transactivation pathway that does not involve Shc isoforms or lead to p66Shc-Ser36 phosphorylation. In cardiomyocytes, thrombin triggers MEK-dependent p66Shc-Ser36 phosphorylation, but this is not via EGFR transactivation (or associated with Shc-Tyr239/Tyr240 and/or Tyr317 phosphorylation). Importantly, p66Shc protein expression is detected in neonatal, but not adult, cardiomyocytes; p66Shc expression is induced (via a mechanism that requires protein kinase C and MEK activity) by Pasteurella multocida toxin, a Gαq agonist that promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. These results identify novel regulation of individual Shc isoforms in receptor-dependent pathways leading to cardiac hypertrophy and the transition to heart failure. The observations that p66Shc expression is induced by a Gαq agonist and that PAR-1 activation leads to p66Shc-Ser36 phosphorylation identifies p66Shc as a novel candidate hypertrophy-induced mediator of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and heart failure.

Cardiac hypertrophy and the progression to heart failure is the result of a complex array of signaling events that lead to structural remodeling of the ventricle. The literature has focused primarily on signaling mechanisms that regulate cardiomyocyte growth and survival. However, cardiac fibroblasts (activated by fibrogenic growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines) also play an important role in influencing the archi-tecture and mechanical behavior of the heart by regulating collagen matrix remodeling and by elaborating growth factors that promote cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Extensive cardiac fibroblast-induced structural remodeling disrupts the normal transmission of electrical impulses, impairs contractile performance, and critically influences clinical heart failure syndromes.
Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) 2 is a G protein-coupled receptor that is proteolytically activated by thrombin and other pro-inflammatory proteases. We previously demonstrated that chronic/persistent PAR-1 activation leads to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and cardiac fibroblast proliferation (1). PAR-1-dependent growth responses are mediated by distinct signaling mechanisms in cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts. PAR-1 evokes a robust increase in ERK, p38-MAPK, and AKT and increases DNA synthesis via an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) transactivation pathway in cardiac fibroblasts, whereas PAR-1 activates ERK (and induces only a relatively minor increase in AKT) via a mechanism that does not require EGFR kinase activity in cardiomyocytes. The contextual nature of PAR-1 signaling emphasizes the need to directly examine PAR-1 actions in physiologically relevant cardiac preparations.
Shc proteins are molecular adapters that link surface receptors to mitogenic responses. Shc is expressed as three isoforms that are encoded by a single gene locus (2,3). p46Shc and p52Shc are ubiquitous isoforms that arise through the use of alternative translation initiation sites within the same transcript. In contrast, p66Shc expression is restricted to certain cell types and stimulatory conditions through epigenetic modifications of its distinct promoter (4). All three Shc isoforms share a common domain organization consisting of a C-terminal SH2 domain, an N-terminal PTB domain (slightly truncated in p46Shc), and a central CH1 with phosphorylation sites at Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 (nomenclature based on human p52Shc). Phosphorylation at Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 creates docking sites for the Grb2-SH2 domain, which constitutively associates with the Ras exchange factor SOS, activates the Ras-ERK pathway, and induces mitogenic responses. This function is particularly important for p52Shc, which is hyperphosphory-lated in many tumors and oncogenic when overexpressed in fibroblasts (5).
p66Shc also contains the three sites for growth factor-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation (and it is tyrosine-phosphorylated and binds Grb2 in cells treated with EGF or subjected to oxidative stress). However, the subcellular targeting and signaling functions of p66Shc and p46/p52Shc are quite different. p66Shc does not couple to Ras/ERK activation and it does not transform rodent fibroblasts. Rather, p66Shc inhibits Ras/ERK signaling and blunts mitogenic responses, at least in part by competing with p52Shc for a limited pool of Grb2 (6). p66Shc also has emerged as a pivotal regulator of oxidative stress responses and life span in mammals. p66Shc sensitizes cells to apoptosis through a mechanism that involves its unique N-terminal CH2 domain (not present in p46/p52Shc) and specifically a phosphorylation event at Ser 36 (stimulated by PMA, UV irradiation, or H 2 O 2 (7)). p66Shc links stress activation of p53 to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species accumulation and apoptosis (8). p66Shc also inhibits FOXO transcription factors; because FOXOs induce antioxidant defense enzymes, p66Shc-dependent FOXO inhibition impairs reactive oxygen species detoxification and enhances apoptosis (9). Finally, p66Shc localizes to mitochondria where it participates in membrane depolarization during oxidative stress (10,11). Although these studies identify p66Shc as a critical transducer of oxidative stress signals (and a recent study implicates p66Shc in the deleterious cardiac remodeling induced by subpressor doses of angiotensin II), the mechanisms that control Shc protein expression or activation in the heart have largely been neglected in the literature (12,13).
PAR-1 increases Shc tyrosine phosphorylation (and Shc is implicated in PAR-1-dependent mitogenic responses) in non-cardiac model systems (14,15). However, studies to date have generally been confined to experiments that use anti-phospho-Tyr antibodies (and do not resolve phosphorylation at the Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 sites), focusing generally on phosphorylation of the abundant p52Shc isoform (or heterologously overexpressed Shc proteins). Mechanisms that regulate Shc phosphorylation in cardiac fibroblasts or cardiomyocytes have never been examined. This report takes advantage of phosphorylation site-specific antibodies (PSSAs) to track thrombin-dependent phosphorylation of native Shc proteins (at physiologic expression levels) in the heart. We demonstrate that thrombin promotes p46/p52Shc-Tyr 239 / Tyr 240 and -Tyr 317 (and p66Shc-Ser 36 ) phosphorylation via an EGFR transactivation pathway in cardiac fibroblasts and that thrombin increases p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation (without increasing p46/p52Shc-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and -Tyr 317 phosphorylation) through a PKC and MEK (but not EGFR transactivation) pathway in cardiomyocytes. We also show that G␣ q activation increases p66Shc expression and Ser 36 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes, identifying p66Shc as a candidate hypertrophy-induced modifier of cardiac apoptosis.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cardiac Fibroblast and Cardiomyocyte Cultures-Cardiomyocytes were isolated from the hearts of 2-day-old Wistar rats by a trypsin dispersion procedure using a differential attachment procedure to enrich for cardiomyocytes followed by irradiation as described in detail in previous publications (1). The yield of cardiomyocytes typically is 2.5-3 ϫ 10 6 cells/neonatal ventricle. Cells were plated on protamine sulfate-coated culture dishes at a density of 5 ϫ 10 6 cells/100-mm dish. Experiments were performed on cultures grown for 5 days in minimum Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and then serum-deprived for the subsequent 24 h. Primary cardiac fibroblast cultures were obtained from the cells adherent to the culture dishes during the preplating step as described previously (1).
Measurements of cAMP accumulation and immunoblotting (on lysates or immunoprecipitated proteins) were done according to methods described previously or the manufacturer's instructions (1). All antibodies in immunoblotting studies were from Cell Signaling Technology, with each panel in each figure representing results from a single gel (exposed for a uniform duration); detection was with enhanced chemiluminescence. Recombinant Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT) was expressed and purified as described previously (16). All results were replicated in at least four experiments on separate culture preparations. Fig. 1A shows that thrombin promotes a rapid (maximal at 2-5 min) and transient increase in ERK activity, measured as an increase in phospho-ERK immunoreactivity and decreased ERK protein mobility in SDS-PAGE. Thrombin and PMA induce comparable increases in ERK activity, whereas the magnitude of the ERK response to EGF is ϳ18% higher (n ϭ 7, p Ͻ 0.05).

Shc and ERK Are Downstream Targets of the Thrombin-activated PAR-1 Signaling Cascade in Cardiac Fibroblasts-
Thrombin also promotes Shc tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig.  1B). Cardiac fibroblasts express all three Shc isoforms. p52Shc is slightly more abundant than p46Shc and p66Shc; it is the predominant Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 -and Tyr 317 -phosphorylated species in resting cultures. Thrombin promotes p46Shc and p52Shc phosphorylation at Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 ; this response is detected at 2-5 min and wanes thereafter (at 30 min, similar to the kinetics of thrombin-dependent ERK activation). In contrast, thrombin induces a very minor increase in p66Shc-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 phosphorylation, which is variably  Although thrombin does not consistently increase p66Shc tyrosine phosphorylation, thrombin slows the mobility of p66Shc in SDS-PAGE (without altering the mobility of the smaller p46/p52Shc isoforms). This thrombin-dependent mobility shift (characteristic of a posttranslational modification) has been attributed to agonist-induced phosphorylation at Thr 29 , Ser 36 , and/or Ser 138 (in the unique N-terminal extension of p66Shc (17)). Although p66Shc-Ser 138 corresponds to p52Shc-Ser 29 , p52Shc-Ser 29 phosphorylation does not lead to an obvious p52Shc mobility shift; p46Shc lacks Nterminal phosphorylation sites and is not regulated through this mechanism.
The thrombin-dependent p66Shc mobility shift is pronounced at 5 min and sustained for at least 30 min. EGF and PMA also slow the mobility of p66Shc. PMA (which promotes p66Shc phosphorylation at all three potential Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites) induces the most pronounced p66Shc mobility shift (17). The smaller mobility shifts induced by thrombin and EGF could be due to phosphorylation at fewer sites on p66Shc (or phosphorylation events at all three sites, but on a limited pool of p66Shc protein).
We previously demonstrated that thrombin stimulates ERK in cardiac fibroblasts primarily via a pertussis toxin (PTX)-insensitive pathway involving EGFR transactivation by Src family kinases; PTX-sensitive G i proteins also link PAR-1 to ERK activation, but this is a minor pathway in cardiac fibroblasts (1). Although both pathways in theory could increase Shc tyrosine phosphorylation (18), Fig. 2A shows that thrombin-dependent increases in p46/p52Shc-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and -Tyr 317 phosphorylation are completely blocked by the EGFR kinase inhibitor AG1478 and the Src family kinase inhibitor PP1. EGF-dependent Shc tyrosine phosphorylation and ERK activation also are blocked by AG1478 (but not PP1). Collectively, these results place Src family kinases upstream from EGFRs in the PAR-1-dependent pathway leading to Shc phosphorylation.
EGFR transactivation (and the MEK-ERK cascade) also underlies the thrombin-dependent p66Shc mobility shift, because the thrombin-dependent p66Shc band shift is blocked by AG1478, PP1, and the MEK inhibitor U0126 (Fig. 2B) (under  . Equal amounts of immunoprecipitated protein (derived from 600 g of starting cell extract) were probed for p66Shc-pSer 36 immunoreactivity and p66Shc protein (A). In panels B and C (and all subsequent figures in this article), immunoblotting for Shc (to verify equal protein recovery and loading) was performed on protein immunoprecipitated from 100 g of starting cell extract due to limiting amounts of sample material from primary cultures. At this lower level of protein loading, only p52Shc is consistently detected. JULY 21, 2006 • VOLUME 281 • NUMBER 29

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 20199
conditions where AG1478 and PP1 markedly attenuate and U0126 completely inhibits ERK activation by thrombin). EGF also slows the mobility of p66Shc via a mechanism that is blocked by AG1478 and U0126, further implicating p66Shc as a downstream target of the EGFR-MEK-ERK pathway.
The effects of PMA to alter p66Shc mobility and activate ERK are markedly attenuated by U0126, but not by AG1478 or PP1 (Fig. 2B). Although these results implicate MEK as an upstream component of the p66Shc-Ser/Thr phosphorylation pathway, Fig. 2B provides surprising evidence that a minor component of the PMA response (both the p66Shc band shift and ERK activation) is resistant to U0126 (under conditions where U0126 completely abrogates ERK activation by thrombin and EGF). In contrast, PMA responses are completely blocked by GF109203X (which completely inhibits phorbol ester-sensitive PKC isoforms, Fig. 2C). These results suggest that PKC-dependent p66Shc-Ser/Thr phosphorylation occurs via a MEKindependent pathway. Of note, MEK-independent ERK activation mechanisms have been noted in other cell types (and recently attributed to a PKC⑀-Lck pathway in primary human Schwann cells (19 -22)).
PAR-1 Promotes p66Shc-Ser 36 Phosphorylation via EGFR Transactivation in Cardiac Fibroblasts-The next series of studies used a PSSA to determine whether thrombin promotes p66Shc phosphorylation at Ser 36 (a site uniquely implicated in oxidative stress responses). Preliminary studies show that this PSSA identifies p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation in lysates from thrombin-, PMA-, and H 2 O 2 -treated cultures, but not in postimmunoprecipitation lysates that have been cleared of Shc proteins (Fig. 3A). Although these results validate the selectivity of this PSSA, the results show relatively high background nonspecific immunoreactivity in Western blots on cell lysates with this PSSA. Therefore, p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation was examined using an immunoprecipitation approach; Shc proteins were immunoprecipitated from resting and activated cultures and then probed with the anti-p66Shc-pSer 36 PSSA and an anti-Shc protein antibody (to validate equal protein recovery and loading). Fig. 3B shows that p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation is not detected in resting cardiac fibroblasts; it is induced by thrombin, PMA, and (to a lesser extent) EGF.
The pharmacologic profiles for the agonist-dependent p66Shc mobility shift and p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation are identical (compare Figs. 2B and 3C). The thrombin-dependent increase in p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation is blocked by AG1478, PP1, and U0126 (i.e. it is via an EGFR transactivation mechanism involving Src family kinases and MEK). The EGFdependent increase in p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation also is blocked by AG1478 and U0126, whereas the PMA-dependent increase in p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation is attenuated by U0126 (and completely blocked only when incubations are performed in the presence of GF109203X).
Shc Proteins Are Not Components of the ␤ 2 -Adrenergic Receptor (AR)-ERK Pathway in Cardiac Fibroblasts-Previous studies identified a ␤ 2 -AR-dependent pathway leading to EGFR transactivation, ERK stimulation, and increased DNA synthesis in serially passaged adult rat cardiac fibroblast cultures (23), but a potential role for Shc proteins as components of ␤ 2 -AR signaling responses was not considered. Fig. 4A shows that isopro-terenol induces a transient increase in ERK activity, but there are key differences in the signaling responses to isoproterenol and thrombin: 1) isoproterenol weakly activates ERK compared with the very robust increases in ERK activity triggered by thrombin, angiotensin II, or EGF; 2) isoproterenol increases cAMP accumulation, whereas thrombin does not alter cAMP levels in cardiac fibroblasts (Fig. 4B); 3) thrombin stimulates AKT, whereas ␤-ARs activate ERK without increasing AKT (Fig. 4C) (4). PAR-1 and ␤ 2 -ARs both activate ERK via an EGFR transactivation pathway (that is completely abrogated by AG1478) but via different G proteins (Fig. 4C). ␤ 2 -ARs activate ERK via a PTX-sensitive G i protein mechanism, whereas the PAR-1-dependent ERK activation pathway is largely PTX-insensitive (5). Isoproterenol-dependent ␤ 2 -AR activation does not detectably increase Shc-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 phosphorylation or p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation; ␤ 2 -ARs do not decrease the electrophoretic mobility of p66Shc (Fig. 4, D and E).
Shc Isoform Regulation in Cardiomyocytes-We previously demonstrated that PAR-1 activates ERK via an EGFR transactivation pathway in cardiac fibroblasts, but PAR-1 activates ERK via a distinct mechanism that does not require EGFR kinase activity in cardiomyocytes. Therefore, the next series of experiments examined whether Shc phosphorylation consti- tutes an additional cell-specific component of the PAR-1-ERK signaling pathway in the heart. Fig. 5 shows that neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures express all three Shc isoforms, that Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 -phosphorylation is detected only on p52Shc at rest, and that thrombin increases ERK phosphorylation without detectably increasing Shc-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes. Control experiments show that EGF and H 2 O 2 increase Shc-Tyr 239 / Tyr 240 phosphorylation in this preparation.
Although thrombin does not increase Shc-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes, thrombin decreases the mobility of p66Shc (Fig. 5B). This effect is maximal at 5-10 min and wanes with longer incubation intervals. ␣ 1 -AR activation with norepinephrine (NE) also leads to a subtle and transient p66Shc mobility shift; the mobility of p66Shc is markedly slowed by PMA. Fig. 5C shows that the thrombin-and PMAdependent p66Shc band shifts are abrogated by inhibitors of PKC (GF109203X) or MEK (U0126). Of note, AG1478 attenuates the thrombin-dependent p66Shc mobility shift in cardiac fibroblasts, but AG1478 does not block the thrombin-dependent p66Shc mobility shift in cardiomyocytes (compare Figs. 2B and 5C). Collectively, these results identify p66Shc phosphorylation downstream from the PAR-1-dependent ERK activation pathway, both in cardiac fibroblasts (where ERK activation is via EGFR transactivation) and in cardiomyocytes (where ERK is activated via an EGFR-independent mechanism).
The studies next examined whether agonist-dependent p66Shc band shifts in cardiomyocytes can be attributed to p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation. Fig. 5D shows that thrombin modestly increases p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation and that stronger hypertrophic agonists, such as NE or PMA, induce even greater increases in p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation. Of note, at 30 min, NE increases p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation without significantly reducing the mobility of the protein (Fig. 5, compare B and D). These results indicate that a p66Shc band shift is not necessarily a reliable surrogate marker of p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation in all cell types.
The importance of an agonistdependent pathway leading to p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation is contingent upon the expression of the p66Shc isoform. In this context, Fig. 6 provides important evidence that p66Shc expression is highly regulated in cardiomyocytes. p66Shc immunoreactivity is quite prominent in neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures, in part because of the induction of p66Shc expression during cardiac culture (Fig. 6, compare lanes 5 and 6); p66Shc is detected at lower levels in post-natal day 2 ventricles (lane 3). In contrast, p66Shc is below the limits of detection in adult cardiac preparations (Fig. 6,  lanes 2 and 4). These changes in p66Shc expression are paralleled by similar culture-and age-dependent changes in p46Shc expression. In contrast, p52Shc expression is similar in neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures and ventricle and only modestly reduced in the adult preparations. These results establish that p66Shc (like many other signaling proteins that regulate growth and apoptosis) is down-regulated during normal growth and maturation of the ventricle.
Because many signaling proteins that are down-regulated during development are re-expressed during cardiac hypertrophy, we tested the hypothesis that hypertrophic agonists induce p66Shc expression. These studies took advantage of PMT, a direct activator of endogenous free monomeric G␣ q subunits; we previously demonstrated that PMT activates PKC isoforms, stimulates ERK, and induces hypertrophy in cardiomyocytes (24). Fig. 7A shows that PMT induces a marked increase in the abundance of p66Shc in association with the activation of ERK. PMT also increases p46Shc and p52Shc, although increases in p52Shc are best appreciated in gels with substantially reduced protein loading (data not shown). Fig. 7B shows that PMT also increases p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation in cardiomyocyte cultures to the high level observed in cultures acutely stimulated with PMA. In contrast, PMT triggers a modest increase in ERK activity without increasing Shc isoform expression in cardiac fibroblasts (not significant, n ϭ 3).
The PMT-dependent increase in p66Shc protein abundance is associated with an increase in ERK activity (Fig. 7A). NE, thrombin, EGF, and platelet-derived growth factor do not increase p66Shc or activate ERK under these experimental conditions. These results suggest that Shc expression might be regulated through the MEK-ERK pathway. Fig. 7C provides direct support for this conclusion by showing that the MEK inhibitor U0126 (as well as the PKC inhibitor GF109203X) completely abrogates the PMT-dependent increase in p66Shc expression.

DISCUSSION
These studies implicate Shc isoforms as PAR-1-activated signaling proteins in the heart. We previously demonstrated that PAR-1 couples to an EGFR-dependent MEK-ERK activation pathway in cardiac fibroblasts. These studies identify p52Shc/ p46Shc phosphorylation at Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 as compo-nents of this pathway. Although p66Shc shares considerable structural homology with p52Shc and p46Shc (i.e. p66Shc contains the tyrosines that are the targets for growth factor-dependent phosphorylation) and p66Shc is tyrosine-phosphorylated via direct EGFR activation by EGF, we identified little to no thrombin-induced p66Shc-tyrosine phosphorylation. Rather, we demonstrated that PAR-1 increases p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation via a mechanism involving EGFR transactivation of the MEK-ERK pathway in cardiac fibroblasts. Of note, thrombin also activates ERK and increases p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes, but this is not through an EGFRdependent pathway and it is not associated with p52/p46Shc tyrosine phosphorylation. However, our results should not be construed as evidence that cardiomyocytes generally lack G protein-coupled receptor-dependent EGFR transactivation pathways leading to Shc tyrosine phosphorylation, because recent studies identify endothelin receptor-dependent activation of ERK via an EGFR transactivation pathway involving Shc tyrosine phosphorylation in cardiomyocyte cultures (25). Studies of the actions of thrombin in this manuscript emphasize the highly contextual nature of PAR-1 signaling in the heart (as schematized in Fig. 8) and the potential pitfalls in extrapolating results across cardiac cell models (or between surrogate model systems and physiologically relevant cell types in the heart).
Early studies implicated p52/p46Shc phosphorylation events at both Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 in thrombin-dependent mitogenic responses (15). The focus of most studies was on the similar roles of phospho-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and phospho-Tyr 317 as docking sites for the Grb2-SH2 domain (26). However, more recent literature suggests that these residues are functionally distinct, with Tyr 317 coupling Shc to Fos-dependent activation of the Ras-ERK cascade and proliferation and Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 coupling Shc to Myc-dependent survival pathways. There is evidence that phospho-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 might even be dispensable for EGFR-dependent Ras/ERK activation. However, it is worth noting that the consequences of Shc-Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and -Tyr 317 phosphorylation generally have been inferred from studies that compare responses to high concentrations of  3 and 4) were subjected to immunoblot analysis for Shc isoform expression. FIGURE 7. G␣ q protein activation by rPMT increases p66Shc expression and ERK activity via a PKC-and MEK-dependent mechanism in cardiomyocytes. Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were cultured in 10% fetal calf serum for 24 h and then switched to serum-free medium-containing vehicle, PMT (400 ng/ml), PMA (300 nM), NE (1 M), thrombin (1 nM), EGF (50 ng/ml), or platelet-derived growth factor (50 ng/ml) alone or in the presence of U0126 or GF109203X (each at 5 M, starting 30 min prior to stimulations) for an additional 3 days. Extracts were subjected to immunoblotting (IB) for pERK and Shc protein (A and C ). Shc was immunoprecipitated (IP) to probe for p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation (B). In cardiomyocytes, acute ERK activation by PAR-1 leads to p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation. Chronic G␣ q activation (by PMT) leads to increased p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation via a mechanism involving PKC and ERK. See "Discussion" for further details.
growth factors in cells that heterologously overexpress wildtype or Tyr3 Phe-substituted Shc mutants. The relevance of these results to the controls and consequences of Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 phosphorylation events on native Shc isoforms responding to physiologic stimuli has been questioned (3). Moreover, most studies have been predicated on the assumption that individual phosphorylation events on Shc serve distinct (rather than interdependent) functions. The recent observation that Tyr 317 phosphorylation increases the structural rigidity of Shc (and decreases its affinity for binding partners such as the EGFR and protein phosphatase 2A) suggests that phosphorylation events at Tyr 239 /Tyr 240 and Tyr 317 impact on many aspects of the adapter function of Shc and play a more complex regulatory role in thrombin-dependent responses (27).
p66Shc inhibits the growth-stimulatory effects of p46/ p52Shc and also plays a distinctive role in oxidative stress responses through a mechanism that requires p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation. Studies to date have implicated kinase pathways involving MEK (that may or may not involve ERK) or stress-activated protein kinases (such as JNK and p38) in p66Shc-Ser/Thr phosphorylation, depending upon the cell type and inciting stimulus (28,29). However, many of the conclusions in the literature are based upon studies that track p66Shc mobility shifts. Although this technique provides a reliable readout of overall p66Shc-Ser/Thr phosphorylation, it does not distinguish phosphorylation events at individual Ser/Thr residues. Results reported herein suggest that it is not necessarily a valid surrogate for p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation, because the NE-dependent increase in p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes is associated with only a paltry p66Shc mobility shift. Conversely, thrombin induces an obvious p66Shc mobility shift in cardiomyocytes; the magnitude of the associated increase in p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation is modest in comparison. These results emphasize the importance of studies with PSSAs for unambiguous conclusions. To the best of our knowledge, studies reported herein are the first to directly link activation of a G protein-coupled receptor (PAR-1 in cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes, ␣ 1 -ARs in cardiomyocytes) to p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation. The observation that p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation is a downstream target of a G proteincoupled receptor-activated pathway involving MEK identifies a novel mechanism to account for cardiac remodeling by MAPKs.
Chronic catecholamine stimulation leads to molecular and structural remodeling of the ventricle and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of heart failure syndromes. To date, most studies have focused on catecholamine-triggered events that influence contraction, growth, and apoptosis of cardiomyocytes rather than the catecholamine-dependent mechanisms that act on interstitial fibroblasts. Our studies identify a ␤ 2 -AR pathway involving EGFR transactivation that leads to ERK activation in neonatal cardiac fibroblast cultures. A similar EGFR transactivation pathway is reported to link ␤ 2 -ARs to increased DNA synthesis in serially passaged adult cardiac fibroblasts (23). At first glance, ␤ 2 -ARs and PAR-1 might appear to share a similar EGFR transactivation-MEK-ERK pathway in cardiac fibroblasts. However, more detailed studies expose important differences that deserve emphasis. 1) ␤ 2 -ARs promote a relatively modest increase in ERK activity via a PTX-sensitive pathway. PAR-1 induces a substantially more robust increase in ERK activity that is largely PTX-insensitive (and is presumably mediated by G q and/or G 12/13 ). Of note, ␤ 2 -ARs induce a very robust increase in cAMP accumulation, whereas PAR-1 does not couple to cAMP accumulation in cardiac fibroblasts. A potential role for the cAMP/PKA-dependent pathway to limit ␤ 2 -AR activation of ERK is the focus of ongoing studies. 2) The PAR-1-dependent EGFR transactivation pathway activates AKT; ␤ 2 -ARs do not activate the anti-apoptotic AKT pathway under these conditions. 3) PAR-1-dependent EGFR transactivation leads to p46/p52Shc tyrosine phosphorylation and p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation; ␤ 2 -ARs activate ERK via a mechanism that does not require the adapter function of Shc and does not lead to p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation. These results suggest that PAR-1 and ␤ 2 -ARs play very distinct roles in the control of cardiac fibroblast-induced ventricular remodeling.
p52Shc is a ubiquitous protein detected in various cardiac cell preparations. In contrast, p66Shc is readily detected in neonatal cardiac preparations, but it is at the limits of detection in the adult ventricle. p66Shc is up-regulated by PMT (as part of a G␣ q -dependent hypertrophy program) in neonatal cardiomyoytes, whereas PMT does not lead to a significant change in p66Shc expression in cardiac fibroblasts. These results are consistent with previous publications showing that Shc protein expression is prominent in the developing cardiovascular system during embryogenesis and that p66Shc is essentially undetectable in the adult ventricle. Of note, Cesselli et al. (13) previously identified increased p66Shc expression (in association with an increase in cardiomyocyte apoptosis) in the caninepacing induced heart failure model. Future studies to determine whether hypertrophic stimuli (and/or pathologic insults) also induce p66Shc expression in adult rodent cardiomyocytes (and human hypertrophy and/or heart failure models) will be critical to assessing the functional relevance of the findings reported in this study performed on neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. In addition, it will be important to identify mechanisms that regulate p66Shc expression in the heart. In this regard, Ventura et al. (4) have reported that p66Shc expression is silenced through histone deacetylation and cytosine methylation. It is important to note that recent studies firmly implicate class II histone deacetylations as negative regulators of cardiac hypertrophy that can be neutralized by phosphorylation events triggered by G␣ q -coupled receptors. Although preliminary experiments failed to identify an effect of the histone deacetylation inhibitor trichostatin A to increase p66Shc expression in cardiomyocyte cultures, the relative roles of histone acetylation and promoter methylation as mechanisms to up-or down-regulate p66Shc expression certainly deserve further scrutiny. There also is recent evidence that p38/MAPK-dependent phosphorylation of p66Shc at Ser 54 and Thr 386 leads to an increase in the stability of the protein and an increase in its abundance (30). Either process could contribute to the G␣ q -induced increase in p66Shc expression in cardiomyocytes. Finally, it is worth noting that this study implicates a MEK-ERK pathway in both the induction of p66Shc expression and the stimulus-in-duced increase in p66Shc-Ser 36 phosphorylation. Studies to determine whether these MEK/ERK-dependent effects on p66Shc potentially undermine the otherwise protective effects of the MEK-ERK pathway are ongoing.
There is ample evidence that the natural history of cardiac hypertrophy is to transition to heart failure, at least in part through mechanisms involving cardiomyocyte apoptosis. However, progress toward identifying the molecular signals that execute the apoptosis program in hypertrophied cardiomyocytes has been slow. We previously reported that persistent G␣ q activation (by PMT) can result in enhanced cardiomyocyte susceptibility to apoptosis by repressing basal Akt phosphorylation and impairing Akt activation by survival factors (24). These studies expose an alternative mechanism that is predicted to link G␣ q stimulation to enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and dilated cardiomyopathy involving an increase in p66Shc expression. This formulation is consistent with recent evidence that p66Shc localizes to mitochondria where it functions as a reactive oxygen species sensor (10,11). Mitochondrial events play particularly prominent roles in G␣ q -dependent apoptosis (31). p66Shc, acting as a candidate hypertrophy-induced effector of the cardiomyocyte G␣ q signaling pathway, provides an attractive novel molecular target for heart failure therapy.