Different Modes of Binding of Mono- and Biaromatic Effectors to the Transcriptional Regulator TTGV
ROLE IN DIFFERENTIAL DEREPRESSION FROM ITS COGNATE OPERATOR*
- Department of Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, C/Professor Albareda, 1, E-18008 Granada, Spain
- 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Calle Profesor Albareda, número 1, E-18008 Granada, Spain. Tel.: +34 958 181600, Ext. 326; Fax: +34 958 135740; E-mail: jlramos{at}eez.csic.es.
Abstract
Members of the IclR family of regulators exhibit a highly conserved effector recognition domain and interact with a limited number of effectors. In contrast with most IclR family members, TtgV, the transcriptional repressor of the TtgGHI efflux pump, exhibits multidrug recognition properties. A three-dimensional model of the effector domain of TtgV was generated based on the available three-dimensional structure of several IclR members, and a series of point mutants was created. Using isothermal titration calorimetry, we determined the binding parameters of the most efficient effectors for TtgV and its mutant variants. All mutants bound biaromatic compounds with higher affinity than the wild-type protein, whereas monoaromatic compounds were bound with lower affinity. This tendency was particularly pronounced for mutants F134A and H200A. TtgVF134A bound 4-nitrotoluene with an affinity 13-fold lower than that of TtgV (17.4 ± 0.6 μm). This mutant bound 1-naphthol with an affinity of 5.7 μm, which is seven times as great as that of TtgV (40 μm). The TtgVV223A mutant bound to DNA with the same affinity as the wild-type TtgV protein, but it remained bound to the target operator in the presence of effectors, suggesting that Val-223 could be part of an intra-TtgV signal recognition pathway. Thermodynamic analyses of the binding of effectors to TtgV and to its mutants in complex with their target DNA revealed that the binding of biaromatic compounds resulted in a more efficient release of the repressor protein than the binding of monoaromatics. The physiological significance of these findings is discussed.
Footnotes
-
↵2 The abbreviations used are: 1NL, 1-naphthol; BN, benzonitrile; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; IND, indole; ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; 4NT, 4-nitrotoluene; PDB, Protein Data Bank.
-
↵3 W. Terán, A. Felipe, M.-E. Guazzaroni, T. Krell, R. Ruiz, J. L. Ramos, and M.-T. Gallegos, submitted for publication.
-
↵* This study was supported by Grants GEN2001-4698-CO5-03, BIO2003-00515, and BIO2006-05668 from the Ministry of Science and Education in Spain, Grant VEM2004-08560 from the Ministry of the Environment, a grant from Junta de Andalucía (Andalusian Regional Government) to research group CIV191, and Grant RGY0021/2002 from the Human Frontier Program. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
-
- Received October 26, 2006.
- Revision received March 27, 2007.











