Architecture and Molecular Mechanism of PAN, the Archaeal Proteasome Regulatory ATPase*
- Noa Medalia‡§,1,
- Avital Beer‡,1,
- Peter Zwickl¶,
- Oana Mihalache¶,
- Martin Beck‖,
- Ohad Medalia§¶ and
- Ami Navon‡,2
- From the ‡Department of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel,
- the §Department of Life Sciences and National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84195, Israel,
- the ¶Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany, and
- the ‖Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Wolfgang Pauli-Strasse 16, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- ↵2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-9343719; Fax: 972-8-9344116; E-mail: ami.navon{at}weizmann.ac.il.
-
↵1 Both authors contributed equally to this study.
Abstract
In Archaea, an hexameric ATPase complex termed PAN promotes proteins unfolding and translocation into the 20 S proteasome. PAN is highly homologous to the six ATPases of the eukaryotic 19 S proteasome regulatory complex. Thus, insight into the mechanism of PAN function may reveal a general mode of action mutual to the eukaryotic 19 S proteasome regulatory complex. In this study we generated a three-dimensional model of PAN from tomographic reconstruction of negatively stained particles. Surprisingly, this reconstruction indicated that the hexameric complex assumes a two-ring structure enclosing a large cavity. Assessment of distinct three-dimensional functional states of PAN in the presence of adenosine 5′-O-(thiotriphosphate) and ADP and in the absence of nucleotides outlined a possible mechanism linking nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to substrate recognition, unfolding, and translocation. A novel feature of the ATPase complex revealed in this study is a gate controlling the “exit port” of the regulatory complex and, presumably, translocation into the 20 S proteasome. Based on our structural and biochemical findings, we propose a possible model in which substrate binding and unfolding are linked to structural transitions driven by nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, whereas translocation into the proteasome only depends upon the presence of an unfolded substrate and binding but not hydrolysis of nucleotide.
Footnotes
-
↵* This work was supported in part by the Israeli Science Foundation Grants ISF 802/04 (to A. N.) and ISF 794/02 (to O. M.), German Minerva Foundation Grant 780040 (to A. N.), German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development Grant GIF I-845-210.9/2004), and a special donation from Rolando Uziel (to A. N.).
-
↵
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1–S3 and Movies PAN ATPγS.mpg and PAN Δ1–73.mpg.
- Received December 23, 2008.
- Revision received March 20, 2009.
- © 2009 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.











