Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-mediated Regulation of the Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor Promoter*

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), a proinflammatory cytokine, has been implicated as a central mediator in multiple homeostatic and pathologic processes. Signaling cascades downstream of its cellular cognate receptors, as well as the resultant transcriptional responses have received intense interest in regards to how such signals impact cellular physiology. Notably, TNF-α was shown to potentiate neuronal Ca2+ signaling by enhancing type-1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) steady-state mRNA levels. In the present study, we sought to determine the promoter region ultimately responsive to TNF-α exposure. We report that a sequence encompassing a specificity protein 1 (SP-1) binding site is necessary for TNF-α regulation. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis demonstrated specific binding to this sequence, while site-directed mutagenesis of this site abrogated both JNK-mediated regulation as well as transcription factor binding. Expression of a dominant-negative SP-1 eliminated both the enhanced promoter activity and the elevated IP3R-mediated Ca2+ signals observed with TNF-α exposure. Overall, these data delineate a key pathway by which TNF-α in a neuronal environment modulates IP3R expression and intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis.

Neuroinflammation has been intimately linked to several prominent neurological diseases including Alzheimer, Parkinson, and Multiple Sclerosis (reviewed in Ref. 1). Central to the observed pathological neurodegeneration in these prior studies, is the abnormal production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-␣ (TNF-␣) 2 and interleukin-1 (IL-1) (reviewed in Ref. 2).
TNF-␣ was first described as a protein component of serum that exhibited potent antitumor activity (3). The 212-amino acid transmembrane pro-form, which is active during direct cell to cell contact, is expressed on the plasma membrane (4). This precursor protein is subsequently cleaved into a soluble TNF-␣ molecule by TNF-␣-cleaving enzyme (TACE). TNF-␣ then signals in both an autocrine and paracrine fashion (5). It is this latter form that has been studied as an important immunomodulating agent both in inflammatory processes in the peripheral immune system and in the central nervous system even in the absence of immune cell infiltration (6).
The two major receptors for TNF-␣, p55 (TNF-RI) and p75 (TNF-RII) are expressed on the surface of neurons both in vitro and in vivo (7). Binding of homotrimeric TNF-␣ to either receptor can activate three important signaling pathways: the TNF receptor-associated death domain (TRADD), and the nuclear factor B (NFB) and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling cascades. Through this diverse signaling array, TNF-␣ can regulate many physiologically important pathways in neurons. These include the regulation of cell survival, the initiation of apoptosis, synaptic transmission, and the alteration of gene expression (8 -11).
Cells can also regulate diverse biological processes through the regulation of intracellular ions. Specifically, increases in cytosolic Ca 2ϩ can regulate gene transcription, membrane excitability, muscle contraction, and neurotransmitter release (12). Conceptually, the amplitude and frequency of these Ca 2ϩ signals can be altered in three basic ways: through the modulation of the amount of Ca 2ϩ allowed to pass through an individual channel, by the intracellular location of the channel and through the number of channels present. Our laboratory, as well as others, have previously elucidated the means by which the extent of Ca 2ϩ released from the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP 3 R), a major intracellular Ca 2ϩ release channel, can be regulated by ATP binding and phosphorylation (13)(14)(15)(16). In addition, we have also explored mechanisms by which IP 3 R density and cellular localization can dramatically affect intracellular Ca 2ϩ waves (17). In contrast, the possible role that transcriptional control of IP 3 R expression may impart on endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-derived Ca 2ϩ signals has been relatively understudied.
Recently, we reported evidence for cross-talk between the TNF-␣ and IP 3 R signaling pathways that indicated a role for receptor expression in defining the extent of Ca 2ϩ release. It was shown that TNF-␣ regulates IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ signals in primary murine cortical neurons via a JNK-dependent increase in IP 3 R protein levels (18). This marked enhancement of Ca 2ϩ signals has implications for neuronal excitability since altered ER Ca 2ϩ release can profoundly influence plasma membrane potential (19) and can eventually undermine long-term neuronal viability (20).
In the present study, we examined the JNK-dependent regulation of type-1 IP 3 R mRNA expression by TNF-␣ at the level of the type-1 IP 3 R promoter. We report that a functional specificity protein 1 (SP-1) transcription factor binding site exists within the human type-1 IP 3 R promoter and that mutation of this binding site eliminates both JNK regulation and the binding of SP-1. Regulation of IP 3 R expression during periods of TNF-␣ induced neuroinflammatory responses, especially those that arise in the context of progressive neurodegenerative diseases, may contribute to a cellular environment prone to dysfunction and/or death.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell Culture-Neuro2A (ATCC Manassas, VA) cells, passages 2-20, were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) plus 8% fetal bovine serum (Gemini, West Sacramento, CA) in a T75 flask (Corning, Corning, NY). Cell transfection was performed using a nucleofection system (Amaxa, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were trypsinized, resuspended in growth medium, and enumerated. One million cells were then added to a tube containing a total of 5 g of plasmid DNA. The Neuro2A cells were then subjected to nucleofection and plated in 12-well culture dishes (Corning). Addition of murine recombinant tumor necrosis factor-␣ (TNF-␣; Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ) was performed prior to analysis as indicated. Transfected cells designated for luciferase assays were subsequently lysed with Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI), and samples were stored at Ϫ80°C.
Calcium Imaging-Neuro2A cells were plated on glass coverslips (Carolina, Burlington, NC) for 48 h in 12-well culture dishes (Corning). Twenty-four hours before imaging, 100 ng/ml of murine recombinant TNF-␣ or phosphate-buffered saline, as a negative control, was added to the culture medium. A subset of cultures was pretreated for 1 h with 10 M SP600125 before cytokine addition. Neuro2A cells were loaded with 1 M of the Ca 2ϩ -sensitive dye Fura2-AM (TEFLABS, Austin, TX) for 15 min at 37°C. During this time, ryanodine (100 M) was loaded for the RyR blocking experiment. The cells were then perfused with a physiological salt solution containing in mM: 5.5 glucose, 0.56 MgCl 2 , 2 KCl, 1 Na 2 HP0 4 , 10 HEPES, and 1.2 CaCl 2 , pH 7.4 or a La 3ϩ -Ca 2ϩ reduced solution (300 M La 3ϩ with 0.5 mM Ca 2ϩ ) during store size analysis. Addition of bradykinin (Sigma) to elicit a Ca 2ϩ response was accomplished using a gravity-fed system (Warner Instruments, Camden, CT) while 340/380 nm excitation was provided by a Polychrome V monochrometer illumination system under the control of TILL Vision software. Emitted fluorescence was captured using a SENSICAM-QE (Cooke, Romulus, MI) camera at a sampling rate of 1 Hz. Peak height of the 340/380 ratio from baseline in the presence of the agonist for each Neuro2A cell in the field was averaged for each coverslip (n). A signal more than two standard deviations from the baseline 340/380 ratio was considered a response.
Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR-Total RNA was purified from Neuro2A cells using the TRIzol (Invitrogen) phenol-chloroform method. A High-Capacity cDNA archiving kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was utilized to convert 2 g of RNA into cDNA. Quantification of type-1 IP 3 R mRNA levels was then obtained by comparison of sample reactivity to that of a serially diluted type-1 IP 3 R plasmid in the presence of an Assay-on-Demand primer/probe set (Mm00439917, Applied Biosystems). An 18S rRNA-specific primer/probe set was used as an internal control. To inhibit JNK activity, 10 M SP600125 was added 1 h before the addition of 100 ng/ml of recombinant TNF-␣.
IP 3 R Promoter-driven Reporter Plasmids and JNK-and NFB-activating Constructs-Type-1 human IP 3 R promoter constructs were kindly provided by Dr. Peter Sims (University of Rochester, Rochester, NY) (22). These constructs each contained a defined segment of the IP 3 R promoter inserted into the pGL3 vector (Promega) upstream of the firefly luciferase reporter gene. Numbers designated in the name assigned to each reporter plasmid indicate the distance from the transcriptional start site of the IP 3 R gene. The ⌬MEKK and p65 expression plasmids were kindly provided by Dr. Dirk Bohmann (University of Rochester) and Dr. Sanjay Maggirwar (University of Rochester), respectively (23,24). The dominant-negative SP-1 construct and respective control was provided by Gerald Thiel (Saarland Medical Center, Homburg, Germany) (25).
Luciferase Activity Measurements-Neuro2A cell lysates were analyzed using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter assay (Promega) in accordance with the manufacturer's directions. Briefly, 20 l of cell lysate was added to a 96-well Black Bottom Plate (Corning), and room temperature luciferase reagent was added to each well. A Lumicount luminescent plate reader (Packard, Downers Grove, IL) was first used to monitor firefly luciferase activity and then Renilla luciferase activity after the addition of a Stop and Glo reagent (Promega). Renilla expression was used as an internal transfection control, levels of which remained unchanged in each of the transfection experiments.
Site-directed Mutagenesis-Sites within the type-1 IP 3 R promoter that were predicted to be regulated by JNK were mutated using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The sequences that were altered are as follows; Ϫ252 was altered from 5Ј-GACTTTGAAC-3Ј to 5Ј-CCTCCCCCCT-3Ј and ϩ59 and ϩ125 were altered from 5Ј-GAGAGGA-3Ј to 5Ј-TGTGTTG-3Ј.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay-Nuclear lysates were obtained by mechanically disrupting Neuro2A cells in a sucrose solution containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40. A salt gradient (increasing KCl) method was used to separate the cytosolic proteins from nuclear extracts. Resultant nuclear preparations were tested for their ability to bind to a 42-bp oligonucleotide probe formed by the annealing of two synthesized primers encompassing the ϩ38 to ϩ80 region of the type-1 IP 3 R promoter and labeled with ␣-32 P-labeled deoxynucleotides. The primer sequences were the following: Sense strand 5Ј-GGGGT-GGGAGGAGAGGAGGAGGAGGAG-3Ј; antisense strand 5Ј-CCACCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCTCCTCCCA-3Ј. A 32 P-labeled mutant probe was also generated that contained the sequence 5Ј-TGTGTTG-3Ј to replace the wild-type sequence 5Ј-GAGAGGA-3Ј. The nuclear extracts were incubated for 30 min at 22°C with the probe in the presence of poly(dIdC) and binding buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 750 mM KCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 62.5% glycerol). In antibody competition assays, SP-1 and c-Fos antibodies (Millipore, Billerica, MA) were added at the time of probe incubation. The samples were then subjected to electrophoresis on a 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Exposures were obtained by subjecting the dried gel to autoradiography film (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ).

TNF-␣ Enhances IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ Signals and mRNA
Levels in Neuro2A Cells-Previously, we reported that the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-␣ enhanced Ca 2ϩ signals in primary cortical neurons (18). In an effort to find a suitable cell model for determining the mechanism responsible for the enhanced mRNA levels, we examined the effects of TNF-␣ in the Neuro2A murine neuroblastoma cell line. Neuro2A cells were plated on glass coverslips and subsequently subjected to Ca 2ϩ imaging. A 24-h pretreatment with 100 ng/ml TNF-␣ led to a significant up-regulation of bradykinin-induced cytosolic Ca 2ϩ signals (Fig. 1, A and B). In agreement with our previous studies, these augmented signals were also sensitive to the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (Fig. 1, A and B). The ability of JNK activity to directly regulate IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ signals was also assayed by the transient transfection of ⌬MEKK1, a truncated MEKK construct that leads to the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of JNK (26). ⌬MEKK1 was nucleofected into Neuro2A cells 24 h before Ca 2ϩ imaging ( Fig. 1, C and D), and the transfection efficiency was monitored by the co-transfection of hcRed. Fluorescence monitoring indicated ϳ50% of the cells in the field of view were transfected (data not shown). Again, Ca 2ϩ signals downstream of bradykinin activation were enhanced in the presence of ⌬MEKK1, suggesting JNK can regulate IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ signaling in this neuronal cell line.
It was previously reported that the TNF-␣-mediated enhancement of IP 3 R-derived Ca 2ϩ signals in primary neurons was independent of alterations in calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) or differences in ER store loading (18). CICR occurs when Ca 2ϩ released from the IP 3 R increases the open probability of proximal ryanodine receptors (RyR). To disable this coupling and examine the possible role of CICR in the cytokine enhanced bradykinin-induced Ca 2ϩ signals, ryanodine was added to the Neuro2A cells prior to Ca 2ϩ imaging. The addition of the CICR blocker did not alter the enhanced bradykinin signals, suggesting CICR was not responsible for the effect (Fig. 1, E and F). Augmented ER Ca 2ϩ loading could also enhance IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ release. To measure the amount of Ca 2ϩ in the ER store, cyclopiazonic acid (CPA), which induces passive leak from ER stores by blocking SERCA pump activity, was added in the presence of a Ca 2ϩ entry blocking solution containing La 3ϩ . In agreement with our previous findings, there was no alteration in the levels of Ca 2ϩ within the ER following TNF-␣ addition (Fig. 1, G and H).
Our previous data had also indicated that in primary neurons, an increase in type-1 IP 3 R mRNA positively correlated with this induction. To measure type-1 IP 3 R mRNA, Neuro2A cells were treated with recombinant TNF-␣ or phosphate-buffered saline and mRNA was purified at various time points. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR revealed a significant increase (3-fold, p ϭ 0.01) in type-1 IP 3 R mRNA levels 8 h after cytokine addition (Fig. 1I). This enhancement in IP 3 R mRNA was also sensitive to SP600125 (Fig. 1J) and correlated with an increase in type-1 protein 24 h after cytokine addition (Fig. 1, K and L).
In aggregate, the observed increase in Ca 2ϩ signals as a result of direct JNK activation, the enhanced type-1 IP 3 R mRNA, protein, and Ca 2ϩ signals with TNF-␣ incubation suggests that Neuro2A cells express a homologous signaling pathway to that observed in primary neurons and represent an appropriate cell model for examining the effects of TNF-␣ on IP 3 R promoter activity.
TNF-␣ Regulates the Activity of the Type-1 IP 3 R Promoter-A reporter plasmid consisting of a 772-bp segment of the human type-1 IP 3 R promoter lying upstream of the luciferase gene was transiently transfected into Neuro2A cells to assay for an increase in promoter activity following TNF-␣ exposure. A significant increase in luciferase activity was observed 3 h after cytokine addition, which was maintained at the 6-h time point, and returned to baseline by 12 h (Fig. 2A). This suggested a temporal regulation of IP 3 R promoter activity via TNF-␣-dependent signaling. We next sought to determine the region of the IP 3 R promoter that was responsive to TNF-␣ activation. Three overlapping promoter constructs spanning Ϫ582, Ϫ252, and Ϫ9 bp from the transcriptional start site to ϩ190 bp after the initiation site of the human IP 3 R gene locus were transfected into Neuro2A cells. TNF-␣ incubation led to activation of luciferase expression from all three constructs to a similar degree, indicating the site of regulation lies within the shortest common promoter region, Ϫ9 to ϩ190 (Fig. 2B).
The Ϫ9 to ϩ190 Promoter Region Is Sufficient for JNK Activation of Transcription-TNF-␣, through activation of its cell surface receptors TNF-RI and TNF-RII, has been linked to two major transcriptional regulatory cascades, JNK and NFB. In an effort to more precisely implicate the pathway involved, we activated JNK and NFB directly using a molecularly based approach. To confirm the ability of the ⌬MEKK1 and p65 plasmids to activate JNK and NFB in Neuro2A cells, we transiently co-transfected the plasmids with luciferase reporter constructs harboring concatenated consensus binding sites for AP-1 and NFB (Fig. 3, A and B). After the specificity and ability of these constructs to activate their respective pathways was verified, the truncated type-1 IP 3 R promoter-driven luciferase plasmids were co-transfected. Only ⌬MEKK1 co-transfection significantly enhanced luciferase expression from all three reporter constructs (Fig. 3C) indicating that the regulatory site(s) responsive to both TNF-␣ and JNK activation lies within the Ϫ9 to ϩ190 bp region.
ϩ59-bp Site within IP 3 R Promoter Is Responsible for JNK Regulation-In silico examination of the IP 3 R promoter DNA sequence with transcription factor binding site prediction software AliBaba (version 2.1) and Genomatix's MatInspector, along with information garnered from Deelman et al. (27) suggested three putative JNK-regulated sites. A predicted AP-1 site was located outside the region of interest at Ϫ252 bp, and two possible AP-1 or SP-1 sites were mapped to the Ϫ9 to ϩ190 bp region at ϩ59 and ϩ125 relative to the IP 3 R transcriptional start site (Fig. 4A). Site-directed mutagenesis of the core sequence at each of these sites was performed, and the effect of these mutations on promoter activity in the presence of the JNK activator ⌬MEKK1 was determined. Mutation of the Ϫ252 bp site did not affect ⌬MEKK1-mediated enhancement of luciferase activity as expected from the previous experiments using the truncated promoter plasmids (Fig. 4B). Similarly, ablation of the ϩ125bp site did not alter ⌬MEKK1-mediated enhancement (Fig. 4C). In contrast, mutation of the ϩ59 site abolished the enhancement in luciferase activity following ⌬MEKK1 expression (Fig. 4D). This finding suggested that the site(s) of imaging. E, trace is shown illustrating the absence of a caffeine-induced Ca 2ϩ signal, indicating successful block of the RyR. Box plot parameters: dots represent coverslip averages, the center of the box is the mean of the data, the edge of the box is one S.E., whiskers are one S.D. F, similar cytokine-induced enhancement in bradykinin signals suggested RyR coupling is not responsible for the effect. G and H, Ca 2ϩ stores were measured using the cyclopiazonic acid leak method (in 300 M La 3ϩ -reduced Ca 2ϩ external solution), and total Ca 2ϩ released by the area under the curve method is shown. I, total RNA from TNF-␣-treated and untreated cultures was isolated at 0, 4, 8, and 12 h after cytokine addition. cDNA was subsequently prepared and quantitative real-time RT-PCR performed to determine the steady-state levels of the type-1 IP 3 R mRNA with TNF-␣ treatment. Transcript expression changes are depicted as fold-change as compared with values obtained from the 0-h control time point. J, total RNA from TNF-␣-treated and control cultures was isolated at 8 h after cytokine addition, but in the absence or in the presence of SP600125. Transcript expression changes are depicted as fold-change as compared with values obtained from the untreated control condition. K and L, type-1 IP 3 R protein levels were analyzed via Western blotting and OD measurements are shown. Error bars represent 1 S.E., and p values were obtained using two-tailed Student's t-test.
JNK regulation resides at the ϩ59 bp site within the type-1 IP 3 R promoter and that either AP-1 or SP-1 transcription factor binding could be key to this regulation.

Regulation of the IP 3 R Promoter Is Not Regulated by c-Jun-MatInspec-
tor software had suggested that the ϩ59-bp site harbors a consensus AP-1 binding site. To determine if this site was regulated by c-Jun, a major component of AP-1, a dominant-negative (DN) c-Jun construct was employed (28). Again, the AP-1 reporter construct was utilized to confirm the ability of the c-Jun-DN to block AP-1 activity. Expression of ⌬MEKK1 led to a significant increase in luciferase activity, which was inhibited in the presence of the c-Jun-DN gene (Fig. 5A). However, expression of c-Jun-DN and c-Jun imparted no effect on the enhanced luciferase activity observed with the full-length IP 3 R promoter reporter in the presence of ⌬MEKK1 expression and cytokine addition (Fig. 5, B and C). These data indicated that c-Jun was not playing a central role in the regulation IP 3 R promoter activity by JNK.
Gel Shift Analyses Demonstrate SP-1 Binding at the ϩ59-bp Site-Because the ϩ59-bp site was implicated as being responsive to JNK activation, we sought to measure transcription factor binding to a probe derived from this region of the type-1 IP 3 R promoter. Nuclear lysates obtained from Neuro2A cells significantly retarded the migration of a 42-bp probe containing the ϩ59-bp site in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA, Fig.  6A). This binding was specific since it was competed away with the addition of a molar excess of non-radiolabeled probe. Additionally, when a radiolabeled probe mutated at the putative binding site (GAGAGGA-TGTGTTG) was utilized, no shifted complexes were observed (Fig. 6B). This suggested the nuclear extracts harbored a binding activity that specifically interacted with DNA sequences within this region. Moreover, addition of excess cold mutated probe did not compete away binding to the wild-type probe, indicating that factor binding was eliminated when the core site was ablated (Fig. 6B). Additionally, in agreement with the c-Jun-DN data described above, the addition of a cFos antibody failed to eliminate or shift the FIGURE 2. Enhanced IP 3 R promoter activity with TNF-␣ addition. Constructs containing the Ϫ582 to ϩ190 region of the human type-1 IP 3 R promoter driving the expression of firefly luciferase were utilized to determine the ability of TNF-␣ to enhance IP 3 R transcription. A, luciferase activity was tested at varying time points after 100 ng/ml TNF-␣ addition to obtain a temporal profile of regulation. B, deletion constructs were utilized to determine which region of the promoter was responsive to TNF-␣ regulation. Consistent luciferase activity observed 6 h after cytokine addition from each of the constructs suggested the Ϫ9 to ϩ190 region as the site of regulation. Transfection efficiency was monitored by the co-transfection of a Renilla luciferase construct. n ϭ 6 for each group. Error bars represent 1 S.D. and * indicates a p value Ͻ 0.01 obtained by a Bonferroni Multiple Comparison.
band corresponding to protein/DNA complex, further indicating AP-1 does not bind to the ϩ59-bp site (Fig. 6C). Importantly, we observed a decrease in the intensity of the shifted band with SP-1 antibody incubation (Fig. 6C). This finding suggested SP-1 was a component of the shifted complex, and implicated SP-1 binding at the ϩ59-bp site in TNF-␣ induced, JNKmediated regulation of IP 3 R expression.

Dominant-negative SP-1 Blocks the TNF-␣ Enhancement of IP 3 Rmediated Ca 2ϩ Signals and Pro-
moter Activity-To further examine the potential role SP-1 may play in the TNF-␣ enhancement in IP 3 R mediated Ca 2ϩ signals and promoter activity, we utilized a plasmid expressing a dominant-negative SP-1/glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein (pSP1-DN) to block SP-1 activity (25, 29 -31). The ability of dominant-negative SP-1 to block the enhancement of IP 3 R promoter activity by TNF-␣ addition was determined by transfecting both the pSP1-DN and full-length IP 3 R promoter luciferase constructs into Neuro2A cells (Fig.  7A). The dominant-negative SP-1 eliminated the enhanced promoter activity observed following cytokine addition. Next, the ability of the pSP1-DN construct to block the elevated IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ signals observed with TNF-␣ incubation was assessed. TNF-␣ exposure produced the characteristic enhancement of bradykinin-induced Ca 2ϩ signals in Neuro2A cells transfected with the control pEBGN construct (Fig. 7, B and C). In contrast, TNF-␣ did not significantly affect IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ signals in cells expressing dominant-negative SP-1 (Fig. 7, B and C). These data, in aggregate, indicate that TNF-␣ enhances IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ signals and promoter activity through an SP-1-mediated process.

DISCUSSION
Our current work delineates a pathway by which TNF-␣ signaling can regulate the transcription of the type-1 IP 3 R gene, thereby leading to greater Ca 2ϩ release from the ER (18). Importantly, this increase in mRNA was sensitive to the JNK inhibitor SP600125, suggesting IP 3 R mRNA levels are regulated through either an enhancement in transcription or a JNK-dependent regulation of type-1 IP 3 R mRNA stability. Binding of the cytokine to its cell surface receptor leads to JNK activation, and phosphorylation of downstream transcription factors like AP-1 and SP-1 (32,33). Our data indicate that the human type-1 IP 3 R promoter contains a key SP-1 binding element 59 base FIGURE 3. Enhanced IP 3 R promoter activity with JNK activation. To identify which signaling pathway was primarily responsible for enhanced IP 3 R promoter activity following TNF-␣ exposure, ⌬MEKK1 and p65 expression plasmids were employed to separately activate JNK and NFB signaling, respectively. A, plasmid harboring a concatenated AP-1 consensus binding sequence upstream of a luciferase reporter gene, pGL3-AP1, was utilized to confirm JNK-related activation by the ⌬MEKK1 expression plasmid. B, second plasmid that contained a concatenated NFB consensus binding sequence upstream of a luciferase reporter gene, pGL3-NFB, was utilized to confirm NFB-related activation by the p65 expression plasmid. C, luciferase reporter constructs that contained progressively shorter segments of the human IP 3 R promoter upstream of the luciferase gene were co-transfected with either the ⌬MEKK1 or NFB expression plasmids and luciferase assays were performed 24-h later. Transient co-transfection of a control plasmid, hcRed, or the NFB p65 expression construct with any of these IP 3 R promoter deletion plasmids into Neuro2A cells did not significantly affect luciferase activity output, whereas co-transfection of the ⌬MEKK1 construct resulted in significant enhancement of luciferase reporter gene expression from each of the three reporter plasmids. Error bars represent 1 S.E., and * indicates a p value Ͻ 0.01 by one-way ANOVA.
pairs downstream of the putative transcription start site and mutation of this sequence abrogates SP-1 binding and JNK regulation. Additionally, the expression of a dominant-negative SP-1 was able to block the ability of TNF-␣ to affect IP 3 R Ca 2ϩ signals and promoter activity. These findings, in aggregate, uncover a novel pathway for the regulation of ERderived Ca 2ϩ signals during conditions of TNF-␣-mediated neuroinflammation. . Site-specific activation of the IP 3 R promoter by ⌬MEKK1. The regulation of the human type-1 IP 3 R promoter with JNK activation was further analyzed using luciferase constructs containing wild type and mutated versions of the putative AP-1/SP-1 sites identified within the IP 3 R promoter. A, 771-bp nucleotide sequence of the full-length human IP 3 R promoter is shown, and the sequences corresponding to the location of the putative JNKregulated sites are underlined. Luciferase reporter constructs that contain wild-type or mutated versions of the three predicted AP-1/SP-1 binding sites centered at Ϫ252 (B), ϩ59 (D), and ϩ125 bp (C) within human IP 3 R promoter upstream of the luciferase gene were co-transfected with either the ⌬MEKK1 expression plasmid or hcRed control plasmid, and luciferase assays were performed 24 h later. Error bars represent 1 S.E. n ϭ 6 for each group, and * indicates a p value Ͻ 0.01 by one-way ANOVA.  -DN), and/or ⌬MEKK1 expression plasmid along with a plasmid harboring concatenated AP-1 consensus binding sequence upstream of a luciferase reporter gene. Luciferase expression was assayed 24 h after transfection. B, Neuro2A cells were co-transfected with a c-Jun, c-Jun-DN, and/or ⌬MEKK1 expression plasmid along with plasmid harboring the human IP 3 R promoter sequence upstream of a luciferase reporter gene. An hcRed reporter gene-expressing plasmid was included as an internal control, and firefly luciferase activity was measured 24 h after transfection. C, Neuro2A cells were transfected with a c-Jun or c-Jun-DN along with the human IP 3 R promoter reporter gene. Cultures were then incubated in the presence of 100 ng/ml TNF-␣. Luciferase expression was assayed 6 h later. Error bars represent 1 S.E. * indicates a p value Ͻ 0.01 obtained by a Bonferroni Multiple Comparison test after significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. OCTOBER 2, 2009 • VOLUME 284 • NUMBER 40

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 27563
The cloning and sequencing of the mouse and human IP 3 R promoter has been previously described (27,34), and functional assays have indicated that the core promoter spans the putative transcription start site (Ϫ528 to ϩ169 in mouse and Ϫ86 to ϩ145 in the human homolog). These respective sequences are required to mimic the expression profile of endogenous IP 3 R. Of particular interest is the high degree of homology between the murine and human type-1 IP 3 R promoters in several regions including the ϩ49 to ϩ70 region, which contains the putative ϩ59-bp SP-1 site characterized in the current study. Additionally, the sequence GAGAGGA, which was shown to be important for transcription factor binding to this region, is found in the mouse, human, rat, and bovine promoters but not the Xenopus and Drosophila IP 3 R genes, with the latter having a similar but altered GAGACGGA site. It should be noted that although both of these sequences deviate from the consensus GGGGCG-  -4), obtained by a salt gradient method, were utilized to examine transcription factor binding to 0.5 ng of 32 P-labeled probe. Protein binding is indicated by retardation in DNA probe migration and is designated in the figure by the bound complex arrow. Molar excess of wild-type control probe (lanes 5-7) was added to compete away the probe/protein interaction to illustrate the specificity of the shifted band. B, binding to a mutated probe was also assayed and the absence of a bound complex (lanes 2-4) indicated an elimination of transcription factor binding. To further test the binding affinity of the mutant probe, we assayed the ability of a molar excess of mutant cold probe to compete away the bound complex formed with the wild-type probe (lanes 5-7). C, during the binding reaction, 1 g of a nonspecific IgG (lanes 1 and 2), c-Fos (lanes 3 and 4), or SP-1 antibody (lanes 5 and 6) was used to evaluate the respective antibodies ability to bind the transcription factor and compete with probe binding.

FIGURE 7. Dominant-negative SP-1 eliminates the ability of TNF-␣ to regulate the IP 3 R promoter and enhance IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2؉ signals.
Neuro2A cells were transiently transfected with pSP1-DN, a plasmid expressing a dominant-negative SP-1 fused to GST, or a control GST-nuclear localization signal construct (pEBGN). A, Neuro2A cells were co-transfected with pSP1-DN or pEBGN and the full-length IP 3 R promoter luciferase construct, and subsequently incubated with TNF-␣ for 6 h. Relative luciferase activity is shown. B and C, Neuro2A cells transfected as described above were subjected to Ca 2ϩ imaging with Fura2, 24 h after TNF-␣ incubation. Sample traces from individual neurons and collective data obtained from coverslip averages is illustrated. p values were obtained by a Bonferroni Multiple Comparison test after significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. Box plot parameters: dots represent coverslip averages, the center of the box is the mean of the data, the edge of the box is 1 S.E., whiskers are 1 S.D.
GGGC SP-1 binding sequence, this transcription factor has been shown to bind to a slightly altered sequence, AAGAGGCGGG, which shares significant similarity to the ϩ59-bp IP 3 R site (35,36). In addition, this region is proximally located downstream of a highly GC-rich sequence, suggesting this binding site may represent one of several SP-1 binding sites in the promoter.
The transcription factor SP-1 is regulated by its phosphorylation state (37), and several groups have shown that it is regulated by MAPK-dependent pathways, including those downstream of TNF-R activation (33,38). Notably, inhibitors of JNK activity can block SP-1 activation, and thereby alter SP-1-dependent gene expression (33). Our gel shift assays demonstrated that this transcription factor is a component of a binding activity derived from Neuro2A nuclear extracts, while expression of dominant-negative SP-1 eliminated the ability of TNF-␣ to enhance IP 3 R-mediated Ca 2ϩ signals and promoter activity. This evidence indicates SP-1 represents the binding factor responsible for JNK regulation of the IP 3 R promoter. Future research utilizing mutants that lack critical serine/threonine residues believed to underlie SP-1 activation in neuronal cells will undoubtedly further help to elucidate its role in this signaling pathway.
It is also important to note that other putative transcription factor binding sites also lie within the highly conserved regions of the IP 3 R promoter, including an AP-2 site that is believed to be a site of retinoic acid regulation and an E-box motif for basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors (27,39). Differential transcription factor binding to these highly conserved sites facilitates specific expression patterns of the type-1 IP 3 R within the CNS, including high levels of expression in the cerebellum and the CA1 region of the hippocampus (40). Notably, the latter brain region has been shown to be deleteriously affected by Alzheimer disease (AD), and our group has demonstrated that TNF-␣ is produced from microglia and neurons residing within this region in a mouse model of AD (41). It will be of interest to determine if IP 3 R expression is altered by TNF-␣ during AD pathogenesis because several groups have implicated altered IP 3 R signaling in AD (42)(43)(44).
Very few studies have examined how the physiological regulation of IP 3 R expression may affect IP 3 -derived Ca 2ϩ signals. Several reports have described how factors like all-trans-retinoic acid and phospholipid scramblase 1 may alter expression through regulation of IP 3 R transcription (22,45). However, these studies have yet to examine the effect of this increase in receptor expression on inositol-mediated Ca 2ϩ signals. To address this question, others have examined IP 3 R stably transfected cell lines and have shown that an 8-fold increase of the IP 3 R protein in L fibroblasts leads to a modest, but significant, increase in total Ca 2ϩ release (46). However, these experiments did not fully elucidate the importance of receptor number on Ca 2ϩ release, since stable overexpression of the receptor may mask the requisite co-factors or scaffolding proteins necessary for proper location and maximal Ca 2ϩ release. Another way one could examine the effect of IP 3 R expression on ER Ca 2ϩ release is by comparing the differences in release kinetics in two different cell types that express differing levels of the channel. Our group has observed that when comparing two similar exocrine cells, parotid acini exhibit a shorter latency, faster rise time to peak, and higher maximal Ca 2ϩ release than pancreas acini possibly due to a 4-fold higher expression of IP 3 R (47). Our current work examines the effect of increasing IP 3 R expression through an endogenous SP-1-mediated transcription event on ER Ca 2ϩ release within a single cell type. To the best of our knowledge this is the first such study, and represents an important step in understanding how a physiological alteration in IP 3 R expression may influence ER-derived Ca 2ϩ signals.
The enhancement of Ca 2ϩ signals downstream of G␣ q activation may not only be due to an enhancement of IP 3 R mRNA and protein, but also as a result of the simultaneous enhancement in proteins that direct localization and stabilize the receptor to facilitate maximal release. The expression of these factors, in addition to the enhanced expression of the channel itself, may have altered other kinetics parameters such as the potency to IP 3 , the latency, and time to peak of the Ca 2ϩ release event. These alterations could result in significant physiological consequences, where an enhancement of IP 3 potency may selectively mediate Ca 2ϩ release in cells exposed to TNF-␣, but fail to initiate a release event in cells that have not been exposed to the cytokine. Further research focused on identification of additional SP-1-or AP-1-responsive genes regulated by TNF-␣ will further elucidate the physiological implication of this pathway and will likely shed light on other inflammatory mediators that may act comparably.
Inflammation within the CNS has been shown previously to regulate several other pathways important in neuronal signaling. Exposure to pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNF-␣ and IL-1␤, inhibits the induction of long-term potentiation, an electrophysiologic correlate to learning and memory, within the CA1 region of the hippocampus (10). Cytokine-based inhibition in these instances can occur through another Ca 2ϩ channel, the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor. This pathway was found to require p38, a mitogen-activated protein kinase, which is activated in a similar manner to JNK observed in our study (11). Additionally, TNF-␣ also regulates the insertion of Ca 2ϩ permeable AMPA receptors in hippocampal neurons, again demonstrating that inflammation can dramatically alter the Ca 2ϩ signaling environment of neurons (48). However, cytokine signaling may not always be detrimental since mice genetically altered to not express functional TNF receptors demonstrate an impairment in LTP (49). This at least suggests that the physiological production of TNF-␣ is necessary to ensure healthy synapses. In either case, cytokines have been shown to significantly influence neuronal communication, and strict control over their expression levels/patterns is undoubtedly important in determining how physiologic outcomes impart a positive or negative influence on neuronal function. Future research efforts will further examine the role inflammatory cytokines in shaping neuronal signals observed during periods of chronic neuroinflammation.