IRAK-1 Contributes to Lipopolysaccharide-induced Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Macrophages by Inducing NOX-1 Transcription and Rac1 Activation and Suppressing the Expression of Antioxidative Enzymes*

Inflammatory stimulants such as bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide (LPS)) are known to induce tissue damage and injury partly through the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Although it is recognized that the induction of ROS in macrophages by LPS depends upon the expression and activation of NADPH oxidase, as well as the suppression of antioxidative enzymes involved in ROS clearance, the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly defined. In this study, we examined the contribution of the interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK-1) to LPS-induced generation of ROS. We observed that LPS induced significantly less ROS in IRAK-1−/− macrophages, indicating that IRAK-1 is critically involved in the induction of ROS. Mechanistically, we observed that IRAK-1 is required for LPS-induced expression of NOX-1, a key component of NADPH oxidase, via multiple transcription factors, including p65/RelA, C/EBPβ, and C/EBPδ. On the other hand, we demonstrated that IRAK-1 associated with and activated small GTPase Rac1, a known activator of NOX-1 oxidase enzymatic activity. IRAK-1 forms a close complex with Rac1 via a novel LWPPPP motif within the variable region of IRAK-1. On the other hand, we also observed that IRAK-1 is required for LPS-mediated suppression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α and PGC-1α, nuclear factors essential for the expression of antioxidative enzymes such as GPX3 and catalase. Consequently, injection of LPS causes significantly less plasma lipid peroxidation in IRAK-1−/− mice compared with wild type mice. Taken together, our study reveals IRAK-1 as a novel component involved in the generation of ROS induced by LPS.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) 2 play a critical role in the regulation of inflammatory processes causing the oxidation of lip-ids and proteins and eventually leading to tissue damage and organ failure. The generation of ROS is modulated by two families of opposing enzymes, oxidative enzymes such as NADPH oxidase and antioxidative enzymes, including glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase. Bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) selectively induce the expression and activation of oxidative enzymes, while decreasing the expression of antioxidative enzymes (1,2). Taken together, LPS challenge significantly contributes to the production of ROS and the pathogenesis of diverse inflammatory diseases.
Most of the published studies regarding NADPH oxidase have been specifically focused on the regulation and activation of NOX-2, the enzymatic NADPH oxidase component primarily expressed in neutrophils (3,4). NOX-2 protein is constitutively expressed and is not regulated transcriptionally (3). LPS challenge causes rapid translocation of the functional NOX-2 containing NADPH oxidase to the membrane complex, leading to its activation (3). In contrast, NOX-1, the primary NADPH oxidase in macrophages, can be both transcriptionally induced and post-transcriptionally activated by LPS. However, the molecular mechanism for LPS-induced expression and activation of NOX-1 is poorly defined. Based on studies done in other cell types (5,6), it is conceivable that LPS may contribute to the activation of NOX-1 containing NADPH oxidase via the small GTPase Rac1 in macrophages (7). However, the detailed molecular mechanism underlying LPS-mediated activation of Rac1 in macrophages is not known.
On the other hand, LPS treatment decreases the levels of nuclear receptor family transcription factors such as PPAR␣ and PGC-1, which are responsible for the sustained expression of antioxidative enzymes, including glutathione peroxidase and catalase (8 -11). Collectively, the LPS-triggered up-regulation of oxidative enzymes and concurrent down-regulation of antioxidases leads to the generation and accumulation of ROS and tissue damage.
IRAK-1 is one of many intracellular signaling components downstream of the LPS receptor (TLR4) (12)(13)(14). A series of studies have revealed that IRAK-1 positively contributes to the activation of NFB, STAT1/3, and IRF5/7, while negatively regulating the activities of nuclear factor of activated T-cells and nuclear receptors (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Despite the prominent role that IRAK-1 plays within the TLR4 signaling pathway, its involve-ment in LPS-mediated ROS production in macrophages has never been defined.
In this study, we tested the hypothesis that IRAK-1 may activate the transcription of NOX-1 via NFB and other related transcription factors and suppress the transcription of antioxidative enzymes through nuclear receptors. Furthermore, we tested whether IRAK-1 may facilitate LPS-mediated activation of the small GTPase Rac1, a key factor involved in the activation of NOX-1-containing NADPH oxidase. The generation of ROS following LPS challenge was measured both in vivo and in vitro using wild type (WT) and IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice and cells.
Mice and Primary Murine Cells-Wild type C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the Charles River Laboratories. IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice with C57BL/6 background were kindly provided by Dr. James Thomas from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. All mice were housed and bred at Derring Hall Animal Facility in compliance with approved Animal Care and Use Committee protocols at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) and murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) were harvested and cultured as we have described previously (21).
Western Blot Analysis-Isolation of whole cell lysates was performed as described earlier (18). Briefly, untreated or treated BMDMs and MEFs were rinsed in PBS and then lysed on ice in 1ϫ SDS lysis buffer (80 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 50% glycerol) containing protease inhibitor mixture. Western blot analysis of the protein samples was performed as described previously. Immunoblots were developed by using the Amersham Biosciences ECL Plus chemiluminescent detection system (GE Healthcare). The intensities of the bands were quantified using the Fujifilm MultiGauge software and then normalized against ␤-actin levels.
Real Time RT-PCR-Total RNA was extracted from untreated or treated BMDM and MEF cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Similar protocol was followed to isolate total RNA from small pieces of mouse liver and kidney tissues (50 -100 g) using TRIzol. Reverse transcription was carried out using the high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems), and subsequent real time RT-PCR analyses were performed using the SYBR green supermix on an IQ5 thermocycler (Bio-Rad). The relative levels of transcripts were calculated using the ⌬⌬Ct method after normalizing with Gapdh as the internal control.
Measurement of Intracellular ROS-To monitor the net intracellular accumulation of ROS, the fluorescent probe chloromethyl-2Ј,7Ј-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was used. WT and IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM cells (5 ϫ 10 5 cells/well on 12-well plates) were treated with LPS 10 ng/ml overnight in phenol-free medium containing 1% fetal bovine serum and then rinsed with PBS containing calcium and magnesium followed by addition of 10 M chloromethyl-2Ј,7Ј-dichlorofluorescein diacetate. After 30 min of incubation at 37°C, cells were washed twice with PBS to remove any extracellular dye. The formation of fluorescent product, dichlorofluorescein, was analyzed using a fluorescence spectrometer with excitation and emission wavelength of 488 and 525 nm, respectively. DCFDA undergoes deacetylation and reacts quantitatively with intracellular radicals (mainly H 2 O 2 ) and is converted to its fluorescent product, dichlorofluorescein, which is  Assessment of Plasma Lipid Peroxidation-The extent of lipid peroxidation in plasma was determined by commercially available colorimetric assay kit BIOXYTECH LPO-586 (OXIS Research, Portland, OR). Plasma samples were collected from WT and IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice 16 h after intraperitoneal injection of LPS. Samples were then diluted with 3.25 volumes of diluted R1 reagent (10.3 mM N-methyl-2-phenylindole in acetonitrile) and mixed by gentle vortexing. After addition of 75 l of 37% (v/v) HCl, the mixtures were incubated at 45°C for 60 min, followed by centrifugation at 15,000 ϫ g for 15 min. The absorbance of the clear supernatant was analyzed at 586 nm.
Rac1 Activity Assay-The activity of Rac1 was measured by the affinity precipitation assay based on the specific interaction of activated Rac with its downstream effectors using the Active Rac1 detection kit (Thermo Scientific). For the Rac activity assay, BMDM cells were lysed in a buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 5% glycerol, and 1 mM dithiothreitol supplemented with protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma). GST-p21-activated protein kinase binding domain beads were used for affinity precipitation assays, and the activated Rac was detected by immunoblotting using an anti-Rac1 antibody.
Cell Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, and Western Blot-MAT4 cells (HeLa cells stably transfected with TLR4 and MD2) were cultured in complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics as described previously (22). Cells were transfected with the wild type pFLAG-IRAK-1 plasmid, the N-terminal deletion pFLAG-IRAK-1-⌬N plasmid, the C-terminal deletion pFLAG-IRAK-1⌬C plasmids, or the pFLAG-IRAK-1 mutant plasmids (L167A/ W168A) as described previously (23). Twenty four hours after the transfection, the cells were treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 5 min. Total cell lysates were prepared using lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 100ϫ protease inhibitors, and 800 g of cell lysate was used to perform immunoprecipitation with an anti-Rac1 antibody or an isotype control antibody from the same company (Sigma). Co-immunoprecipitates were separated on SDS-PAGE and probed for the presence of various IRAK-1 forms and Rac1 using specific antibodies as described in the figure legends.
GPX3 and Catalase Activity Assay-GPX activity in LPStreated MEF and BMDM cells was assessed using a commercially available colorimetric kit (Cayman Chemical), which measures GPX3 activity indirectly by a coupled reaction with glutathione reductase. 170 l of reaction mixture containing 20 l of cell lysates from BMDM or MEF cells, 100 l of assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM EDTA), and 50 l of co-substrate (5.0 mM GSH, 0.1 mM NADPH, 0.1 unit of glutathione reductase) was added in a 96-well plate. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 20 l of 0.2 mM cumene hydroperoxide. The oxidation of NADPH to NADP ϩ leading to a decrease in absorbance at 340 nm was recorded at 1-min intervals for 5 min. The rate of decrease in the absorbance is directly proportional to the GPX activity in the sample. The enzyme activity was expressed as nanomoles of NADPH oxidized per min/ml/mg protein.
The catalase activity in BMDM cells was determined using a commercially available colorimetric kit (Cayman Chemical) based on the peroxidation function of catalase for determination of enzyme activity. The amount of formaldehyde produced was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm with the assistance of Purpald, a chromogen that generates a purple color upon reaction with an aldehyde.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays-WT and IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM cells were either untreated or treated with 100 ng/ml for 2 h followed by cross-linking with 1% formaldehyde in complete media for 15 min with gentle rocking at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice with ice-cold PBS and treated with glycine solution for 5 min to stop the cross-linking reaction. Cells were then lysed in buffer containing SDS and protease inhibitor mixture. Samples were sonicated six times with 30-s pulses at 4°C followed by centrifugation to collect the sheared chromatin. The sheared chromatin was used to set up immunoprecipitation reactions with the indicated antibodies using the CHIP-IT Express kit (Active Motif) as per the manufacturer's recommendations. The immunoprecipitated DNA fragments were analyzed by PCR using the primers spanning the binding sites of the specified transcription factors on the murine Nox-1 promoter.
siRNA Interference Assays-For siRNA interference, WT BMDM cells (2 ϫ 10 6 cells) were plated in 6-well plates and  DECEMBER 18, 2009 • VOLUME 284 • NUMBER 51 transfected the following day by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with the indicated siRNA oligonucleotides (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After 36 h post-transfection, the cells were treated with LPS (100 ng/ml) for the indicated time points followed by DCFDA staining. Whole cell extracts were prepared for Western blot analysis using the specified antibodies.

Regulation of ROS Generation by LPS
Statistical Analyses-Statistical significance was determined using the unpaired two-tailed Student's t test. p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The log-rank test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the mice mortality.

IRAK-1 Is Involved in LPS-induced ROS Formation-To
determine whether IRAK-1 is involved in LPS-induced production of ROS, we measured the intracellular levels of ROS induced by LPS in BMDMs harvested from WT and IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice. Following LPS treatment, the cells were stained with the ROS-selective fluorescent dye DCFDA. The fluorescent intensities reflecting the levels of intracellular ROS were measured with a fluorescent plate reader. As shown in Fig. 1, A and  B, LPS treatments induced a significant increase in ROS production in WT BMDM (20% increase after 15 min of treatment; 60% increase after 16 h of treatment). In contrast, there was no significant induction of ROS following either LPS treatment in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM. To further confirm the specificity and involvement of IRAK-1 in LPS-induced ROS expression, we performed siRNA experiments to knock down the expression of IRAK-1 in WT BMDMs. As shown in Fig. 1C, IRAK-1-specific siRNA results in significant knockdown of IRAK-1 protein expression as compared with the control siRNA (lower panel). The transfected cells were either untreated or treated with LPS for 15 min followed by the measurement of intracellular ROS levels. Consistent with the previous data using IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs, LPS treatment failed to induce ROS levels in IRAK-1 siRNA-transfected cells as compared with the control siRNA (Fig. 1C).
IRAK-1 Contributes to LPS-induced Expression of NOX-1-LPS is known to induce the expression of NOX-1, although the underlying mechanism is not well understood (24). The induction of NOX-1 contributes to the generation of ROS following LPS treatment. Because our study indicates that IRAK-1 deficiency ablates the induction of ROS following LPS treatments, we tested the hypothesis that IRAK-1 may be required for LPS-induced expression of NOX-1. WT and IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM were stimulated with LPS for 2 h. Total RNAs were harvested and used to measure the levels of Nox-1 messages by real time RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2A, the induction of Nox-1 by LPS was significantly lower in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM (3-fold induction in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM compared with 6-fold induction in WT BMDM). Similarly, the protein levels of NOX-1 were significantly higher in WT as compared with IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs in response to LPS (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the levels of Nox-2 remain constant with or without LPS challenge in WT or IRAK-1 cells (data not shown).
Although the transcriptional mechanism for NOX-1 expression is not known, previous studies have identified putative C/EBP-binding sites within the proximal promoter of Nox-1 (25). We therefore examined the status of C/EBP␤ and C/EBP␦ in WT and IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ macrophages. As shown in Fig. 3A, LPS treatment led to a significant induction of C/EBP␤ and C/EBP␦ levels in the nuclear lysates from WT cells. Strikingly, LPSmediated C/EBP␤ and C/EBP␦ induction was significantly impaired in IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ cells (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, we examined the in vivo binding of C/EBP␦ to the proximal promoter of Nox-1 in WT and IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs using chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. As shown in Fig. 3C, there was no basal interaction of C/EBP␦ with Nox-1 promoter. LPS treatment led to a significant recruitment of C/EBP␦ to the endogenous Nox-1 promoter in WT BMDMs. In contrast, the binding of C/EBP␦ to the Nox-1 promoter in response to LPS treatment in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs was dramatically reduced (Fig. 3C). It is increasingly recognized that cooperation among multiple transcription factors is required for inducible gene expression. Besides the C/EBP-binding site, we also observed a putative binding site for NFB within the Nox-1 proximal promoter region (Fig. 3B). We subsequently examined whether LPS may induce the association of p65/RelA to the Nox-1 promoter. As shown in Fig. 3C, LPS induced a significant recruitment of p65/ RelA to the Nox-1 promoter in WT BMDM but not in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs. Our data revealed that LPS induces a combinatorial effect of multiple transcription factors in the regulation of Nox-1 expression.
IRAK-1 Interacts with and Activates the Small GTPase Rac1, the Activator of NOX-1 Enzyme-Once the NOX-1 protein is expressed, its enzymatic activity can be activated by LPS through the small GTPase Rac1 (26,27). Thus, we further tested whether IRAK-1 also participates in LPS-induced activation of Rac1. Using the Rac1 activation assay, we observed that LPS treatment for 5 min resulted in significant activation of Rac1 in WT but not in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM (Fig. 4, A and B).
To examine the molecular mechanism for the IRAK-1-mediated activation of Rac1, we examined whether IRAK-1 and Rac1 may form a close complex following LPS treatment. WT BMDM cells were stimulated with LPS for 5 min, and IRAK-1associated proteins were immunoprecipitated with IRAK-1specific antibody (Upstate, Millipore). An isotype-matched control antibody from the same company was used as a negative control. As shown in Fig. 5A, LPS treatment induced dramatic co-immunoprecipitation of IRAK-1 and Rac1.
We further studied the protein domain(s) required for the interaction between IRAK-1 and Rac1. FLAG-tagged WT and mutant IRAK-1 plasmids were transiently transfected into MAT4 cells (HeLa cells stably transfected with TLR4 and MD2) (Fig. 5B). Transfected cells were treated with LPS for 5 min. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses were performed using the anti-FLAG antibody as described under "Experimental Procedures." An isotype-matched control antibody purchased from the same company was used as a negative control. The resulting immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE and blotted with either the anti-FLAG antibody (detecting various IRAK-1 forms) or the anti-Rac1 antibody. As shown in Fig. 5C, LPS treatment led to co-immunoprecipitation of Rac1 with the full-length FLAG-IRAK-1 and the FLAG-IRAK-1⌬C. Particularly, Rac1 interacted strongly with the FLAG-IRAK-1⌬C mutant, suggesting that the C terminus may inhibit the interaction of Rac1 and the full-length IRAK-1. On the other hand, we observed that the FLAG-IRAK-1⌬N failed to co-immunoprecipitate with Rac1. Therefore, our data indicate that the N-terminal region of IRAK-1 molecule is required to interact with Rac1. We further noticed that the IRAK-1 N terminus contains a novel LWPPPP motif. Interestingly, similar L(W/F/ Y)PPPP motifs are present in proteins involved in cytoskeletal re-arrangement that recruit small GTPases such as CDC42 and Rac1. Intriguingly, we found that the FLAG-IRAK-1(L167A/ W168A) mutant also failed to co-immunoprecipitate with Rac1 (Fig. 5C).

IRAK-1 Is Required for Suppression of GPX3 and Catalase-
The levels of intracellular ROS are not only regulated by the activities and levels of NADPH oxidase but also by the levels of antioxidases. LPS is known to suppress the expression of antioxidases such as GPX and catalase through suppressing nuclear receptor-mediated gene transcription (8). Because IRAK-1 participates in LPS-mediated suppression of nuclear receptor (20), we tested whether IRAK-1 may also contribute to the suppression of antioxidases by LPS. As shown in Fig. 6, A and B, LPS treatment led to a significant reduction of both GPX3 and catalase in WT BMDM (ϳ60% reduction for both GPX3 and catalase). In contrast, their expression levels were not significantly altered by LPS treatment in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM.
To test whether the reduced expression correlates with the actual activities of GPX3 and catalase, we performed activity assays as shown in Fig. 6C. LPS treatment led to a significant decrease in the activities of both GPX and catalase in WT but not IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs.
Key Nuclear Receptor Transcription Factors Involved in GPX3 and Catalase Expression Are Selectively Suppressed in WT but Not IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ Cells-LPS is known to reduce the levels of nuclear receptors such as PPAR␣ and co-activators like PGC-1␣ (8), which are involved in the transcription of GPX and catalase (9,11). We then tested whether IRAK-1 participates in LPS-mediated suppression of PPAR␣ and PGC-1␣. As shown in Fig. 7, LPS treatment led to a 70% reduction of PPAR␣ and a 50% reduction of PGC-1␣ in WT BMDM. In contrast, their levels remained unchanged following similar LPS treatment in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM.
Reduced Plasma Lipid Peroxidation in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ Mice following Lethal LPS Challenge-We subsequently tested the in vivo consequence of IRAK-1 gene deletion using WT and IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice. To determine whether IRAK-1 contributes to LPS-induced mortality via elevated generation of ROS and oxidative damage, we examined the plasma levels of lipid peroxidation from WT and IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice injected with LPS. As shown in Fig. 8, 16 h after the LPS injection, there was a significant increase in plasma lipid peroxidation in WT mice but not in IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice.

DISCUSSION
In this study, we have defined the molecular mechanism underlying the complex regulation of LPS-induced ROS generation in macrophages. We identified that IRAK-1 is critically involved in this process by inducing both the expression and activation of NOX-1 and suppressing the expression of antioxidative enzymes, GPX3 and catalase. Collectively, IRAK-1 Ϫ/Ϫ cells and mice exhibit reduced ROS production following LPS challenge.
Our data provide first-hand evidence revealing the molecular mechanism responsible for the transcriptional regulation of Nox-1 by LPS in macrophages. In particular, we demonstrate that multiple transcription factors, including p65 and C/EBP␤/␦, are coordinately involved in the LPS-induced transcription of Nox-1. Historically, p65/NFB is the most extensively studied transcription factor downstream of TLR4. However, it has been increasingly recognized that p65/NFB alone is usually not sufficient for effective transcription of selected target genes. Instead, cooperation among multiple transcription factors, coactivators, and/or co-repressors is essential for precise control of gene transcription (28,29). Our study also confirms a recent report demonstrating that the TLR4 pathway leads to the activation of C/EBP␤ and C/EBP␦ and indicates that IRAK-1 is necessary for LPS-induced activation of C/EBP␤/␦. Further work is warranted to clarify how p65 and C/EBPs cooperate in inducing the ordered transcription of Nox-1 by LPS in macrophages.
Besides transcriptional regulation, our study indicates that IRAK-1 also facilitates the activation of NOX-1 through activating the small GTPase Rac1 (Fig. 9). Rac1 is a well known activator for the NOX-1 enzyme, and LPS is known to induce Rac1 activation (27). Using transfection assays and dominant negative constructs, O'Neill and co-workers (30) initially reported that dominant negative IRAK-1 antagonizes the function of Rac1. This study confirms and expands upon that finding and provides the first biochemical evidence indicating that IRAK-1 physically associates with Rac1 upon LPS challenge and is upstream of Rac1 activation. Furthermore, our data confirm that the novel N-terminal LWPPPP motif of IRAK-1 is required for its interaction with Rac1. The surrounding region near the LWPPPP of IRAK-1 has been shown to be highly phosphorylated following LPS treatment (31,32). However, its functional implication is still poorly understood. Our study indicates that LPS-induced IRAK-1 phosphorylation near its LWPPPP motif FIGURE 5. IRAK-1 interacts with Rac1. A, WT murine BMDM cells were either untreated or treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 5 min. Equal amounts of total cell lysates were used to perform immunoprecipitation (IP) analyses using an anti-IRAK-1 antibody. Co-immunoprecipitated protein complexes were resolved on a SDS-PAGE and blotted with an anti-Rac1 antibody (top panel). An isotype control antibody from the same company was used to perform similar immunoprecipitation study, which gave no signal near the Rac1 region (data not shown). The levels of IRAK-1 in the cell lysates are shown in the bottom panel. IB, immunoblot. B, diagrammatic illustration of various FLAG-tagged IRAK-1 full-length and deletion constructs used in the transfection studies. C, MAT4 cells were transiently transfected with either pFLAG-IRAK-1, pFLAG-IRAK-1 ⌬N, pFLAG-IRAK-1 ⌬C, or pFLAG-IRAK-1(L167A/W168A) mutant. Equal amounts of lysates were harvested from the transfected cells and used to perform immunoprecipitation analyses using an anti-Rac1 antibody. Co-immunoprecipitated protein complexes were resolved on SDS-PAGE and blotted with an anti-FLAG antibody (top panel). An isotype control rabbit IgG was used to perform a similar immunoprecipitation study and did not give a nonspecific signal near the region of interest. The expression levels of Rac1 and various FLAG-IRAK-1 mutants within the cell lysates are indicated in the bottom panels. The data represent three independent experiments. may be required for the subsequent recruitment and activation of Rac1 in macrophages. In addition, our data reveal enhanced interaction between Rac1 and IRAK-1⌬C suggesting that the C terminus of IRAK-1 may negatively regulate its interaction with Rac1.
Intriguingly, our data also demonstrate that IRAK-1 further contributes to LPS-induced ROS formation by suppressing the expression of antioxidases such as GPX3 and catalase. IRAK-1 suppresses their expression by decreasing the levels of nuclear receptors such as PPAR␣ and PGC-1␣ (8). Although the molecular mechanism underlying IRAK-1-mediated suppression of these nuclear receptors is not clear yet, it is interesting to note that IRAK-1 is distributed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (18,33). In addition, IRAK-1 can interact with Tollip, a molecule implicated in protein ubiquitination, sumoylation, and trafficking (34 -36). It is therefore plausible that IRAK-1, together with Tollip, may selectively regulate the protein stabil-FIGURE 6. IRAK-1 is required for LPS-mediated suppression of GPX3 and catalase. A, effect of LPS on GPX3 and catalase expression in WT and IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM cells. The cells were stimulated with LPS (100 ng/ml) for the indicated time points. After stimulation, the mRNA levels of GPX3 and catalase were analyzed using real time RT-PCR. Each data point represents the mean Ϯ S.D. of at least three independent experiments. *, p Ͻ 0.05, compared with control. B, protein levels of catalase were measured after LPS stimulation in WT and IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs by Western blot. The same blots were probed with ␤-actin as the loading control. C, effect of LPS on GPX3 and catalase activity in WT and IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDM cells. The cells were stimulated with LPS overnight, and the GPX3 and catalase activities were analyzed in the cell lysate using the Cayman kit. Data are representative of three independent experiments. FIGURE 7. Suppression of key nuclear receptors by LPS was mediated by IRAK-1. WT and IRAK1 Ϫ/Ϫ BMDMs were stimulated with LPS for the indicated time points followed by whole cell lysate extraction. The lysates were resolved on SDS-PAGE and analyzed using specific antibodies as indicated. The same blots were probed with ␤-actin as the loading control. The band intensities were quantified using the Fujifilm MultiGauge software and expressed below the respective blots after normalization against ␤-actin levels.
ity and/or trafficking of nuclear receptors such as PPAR and PGC-1 following LPS treatment. Future biochemical studies are warranted to test such hypothesis.
Collectively, our study reveals the potential mechanism underlying the beneficial effects observed in animal models with IRAK-1 gene deletion (14,37,38). IRAK-1-deficient mice are reported to be protected from various inflammatory diseases, including experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, endotoxemia, atherosclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (37, 39 -41). This study further revealed that the IRAK-1-deficient mice undergo significantly less plasma lipid peroxidation following lethal LPS injection. Our data provide compelling evidence indicating that IRAK-1 is not only a key mediator for LPS-induced production of inflammatory cytokines but also regulates the generation of reactive oxygen species leading to oxidative damages. Taken together, we postulate that IRAK-1 can serve as a viable target for future intervention of inflammatory diseases.