Regulation of NF-κB Circuitry by a Component of the Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase Complex Controls Inflammatory Response Homeostasis*

The MTA1 coregulator (metastatic tumor antigen 1), a component of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex, has been intimately linked with human cancer, but its role in inflammatory responses remains unknown. Here, we discovered that MTA1 is a target of inflammation, and stimulation of macrophages with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulates MTA1 transcription via the NF-κB pathway. Unexpectedly, we found that MTA1 depletion in LPS-stimulated macrophages impairs NF-κB signaling and expression of inflammatory molecules. MTA1 itself acts as a transcriptional coactivator of inflammatory cytokines in LPS-stimulated macrophages, and in contrast, it acts as a corepressor in resting primary macrophages as its depletion induced cytokine expression. LPS stimulates S-nitrosylation of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and interferes with its binding to MTA1, which, in turn, resulted in the loss of corepressor behavior of MTA1·HDAC complex in activated macrophages. Consequently, the net levels of inflammatory cytokines in LPS-stimulated macrophages from MTA1−/− mice were high compared with wild-type mice. Accordingly, MTA1−/− mice were much more susceptible than control mice to septic shock induced by LPS, revealing that MTA1 protects mice from deregulated host inflammatory response. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized, critical homeostatic role of MTA1, both as a target and as a component of the NF-κB circuitry, in the regulation of inflammatory responses.

The inflammatory response is an integral part of the host defense mechanism against microbial agents that demands rapid and coordinated control of multiple inflammatory genes in immune cells, including macrophages. Early inflammatory response to microbial products such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) 3 activates the NF-B signaling pathway (1); once acti-vated, the NF-B-p65/p50 heterodimer translocates to the nucleus, interacts with coregulatory molecules, recruits to the target promoters with the NF-B consensus motif, and induces expression of the responsive genes (1). The NF-B pathway is regulated at multiple levels by a series of transcriptional and post-translational events and may be involved in feedback regulatory mechanisms (2)(3)(4). Furthermore, transcriptional control of NF-B genomic targets also is under tight control of nucleosome remodeling coregulators and complexes, leading to either the stimulation or the repression of gene transcription (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Despite the presumptive significance of the regulatory mechanisms responsible for achieving homeostatic control of NF-B target gene chromatins, the role of the NuRD complex or its components in enforcing a dynamic control of inflammatory responses and NF-B signaling network remains unknown.
Regulation of fundamental cellular processes also demands dynamic coordinated participation of transcription factors and their coregulators at the target gene chromatin (12,13), and, therefore, deregulation of such processes plays a critical role in the development of pathologic phenotypes. An emerging family of ubiquitously expressed chromatin modifiers, the MTA family is well known for the integral role in NuRD complexes that is to modify DNA accessibility for cofactors (12)(13)(14). MTA1, the first identified member of the MTA family of genes, regulates cellular pathways by associating and modifying the acetylation status of the target gene chromatin. MTA1 is widely up-regulated in a wide variety of human tumors (14 - 16). MTA1 regulates transcription of its targets by modifying acetylation around the target chromatin and cofactor accessibility to the target DNA. MTA1 functions not only as a transcriptional repressor of estrogen receptor ␣ (17) but also as a transcriptional activator on certain promoters, such as the BCAS3 (breast cancer-amplified sequence 3) (18) and Pax5 transcription (19). Although MTA1 has been linked intimately with human cancer and widely is regarded as a potential master coregulator, the role of MTA1 in inflammatory responses remains unrecognized and delineated here. For the first time, we provide evidence that MTA1 plays a critical homeostatic role in inflammatory responses both as a target and as a component of the NF-B circuitry.
Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis-For quantitative realtime PCR (q-PCR), total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and first-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) using 2 g of total RNA and poly(dT) primer. cDNA from macrophages was synthesized using the FastLane Cell cDNA synthesis kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). q-PCR was performed with the gene-specific primers listed in supplemental Table 1. q-PCR was performed using a 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The levels of mRNA of all the genes were normalized to those of ␤-actin mRNA.
Reporter Assays-Mta1-luc, interleukin (IL)-1␤-luc, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-␣, and MIP2-luc assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, Madison, WI), and the results were standardized against the ␤-galactosidase activity, an internal control. Some assays were performed in the presence of control siRNA or MTA1 siRNA as described previously (20).
Cloning of Murine Mta1 Promoter and Site-directed Mutagenesis-Full-length murine Mta1 promoter and its deletion constructs were generated by PCR using mouse genomic DNA and cloned into PGL3 luciferase reporter vector (Promega) using the Infusion 2.0 Dry-Down PCR cloning kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). The primers used are listed in supplemental Table 2. The sequence of the constructs was verified by comparing construct sequence with that in the mouse genome database. Mutations in the NF-B consensus sequence of murine Mta1 promoter were created by using the site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, Cedar Creek, TX) using the primers listed in supplemental Table 2.
Generation of MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ Mice-To generate mice deficient of MTA1, a targeting vector was designed to delete exon 2 by flanking it with LoxP-splicing sites. The targeted construct was introduced into the PC3 embryonic stem cell line, which has a protamine promoter-driven Cre transgene, to make clones. Individual clones were injected into C57B6 blastocysts, male chimera mice were bred with C57B6 female mice, and germ line transmission was confirmed by Southern blotting and PCR assay. The status of the mRNA transcripts from the Mta1 locus was verified using a pair of primers flanking exon 2. Both lines were kept on a C57B6 and 129Sv mixed background.
Isolation of Peritoneal Macrophage-After LPS treatment, peritoneal lavage was done with 10 ml of sterile ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and the peritoneal lavage fluid was collected. The cells were washed and resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, cultured overnight, and then washed to remove nonadherent cells.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis-Cell lysates were prepared in radioimmune precipitation assay lysis buffer, and Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (20). For immunoprecipitation assays, 1 mg of cell lysates was incubated with MTA1 or pol II or HDAC2 or p65 antibody and agarose beads with constant rotation followed by extensive washing (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 8% glycerol). The immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies for NF-B signaling components.
siRNA Transfection-siRNA against MTA1 and negative control siRNA were purchased from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). Raw cells were seeded at 40% density the day before transfection in 6-well plates, and siRNA transfections were performed with oligofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection, and cell lysates were prepared.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-ChIP assays were performed as described previously (20). Briefly, cells were cross-linked with formaldehyde (1% final concentration) and sonicated on ice to fragment the chromatin into an average length of 500 bp to 1 kb. The lysates were diluted using chromatin-dilution buffer. MTA1 or pol II or p65 or mouse IgG or HDAC2 antibodies were used to immunoprecipitate the respective antigens at 4°C overnight. Protein A-Sepharose beads saturated with bovine serum albumin, and singlestrand DNA were added to the lysate to isolate the antibodybound complexes. The beads were washed to remove nonspecific binding, and the antibody-bound chromatin was eluted. The eluate was "de-cross-linked" by heating at 65°C for 6 h. RNase was added during this step to digest the RNA contaminants. Samples were treated with proteinase K for 1 h at 45°C to digest the proteins pulled down by immunoprecipitation, and, finally, the DNA was extracted using the phenol chloroform method. For the double ChIP experiment, an initial ChIP assay was done with either MTA1 or p65 antibody to immunoprecipitate MTA1-bound chromatin, which was eluted from the protein A-Sepharose beads and subjected to a second ChIP assay with either pol II or anti-HDAC2 antibody. With the DNA isolated at the end of the ChIP analysis, PCR was performed using the primers mentioned in supplemental Table 3.
EMSA-Nuclear extracts were prepared using a Nonidet P-40 lysis method (21). EMSA for NF-B DNA binding was performed using the annealed and [␥-32 P]ATP end-labeled NF-B consensus oligonucleotides in a 20-l reaction mix-ture for 15 min at 20°C. Samples were run on a nondenaturing 5% polyacrylamide gel and imaged by autoradiography. Specific competitions were performed by adding a 100-molar excess of competitor to the incubation mixture, and supershift EMSAs were performed by adding 1.5 l of the NF-B p65 (286-H, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The oligonucleotides used in EMSA were mentioned in supplemental Table 4.
Determination of HDAC2 S-Nitrosylation Was Done by Biotin Switch Method-S-nitrosylation of HDAC2 was detected by using the standard biotin-switch method. The assay was performed using Cayman Chemical's S-nitrosylation detection kit. Briefly, biotinylated proteins were pulled down with streptavidin-agarose beads, and immunoblot analysis was performed to detect the amount of total HDAC2.
Statistical Analysis and Reproducibility-The results are given as the means Ϯ S.E. Statistical analysis of the data were performed by using Student's t test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
MTA1 Is an Inflammation-inducible Gene-During an investigation involving treatment of primary murine peritoneal macrophages with Escherichia coli LPS, we discovered unexpectedly that LPS stimulation of macrophages results in a substantial induction of MTA1 mRNA but not MTA2 mRNA or MTA3 mRNA as measured by q-PCR (Fig. 1A). As expected, increased expressions of IL-1␤, MIP2, IL-6, and TNF-␣, the primary targets of LPS, were observed (Fig. 1A). The results suggest that MTA1 may be an inflammation-inducible gene. Therefore, to test this hypothesis, we turned to LPS stimulation of Raw264.7 cell line (Raw cells), a widely used murine macrophage cell line, as a model system. We found that LPS stimulation led to increased expression of MTA1 protein (Fig. 1B) and mRNA as assessed by q-PCR (Fig. 1C). In contrast, LPS stimulation had no effect on the expression of MTA2 or MTA3 protein (Fig. 1B). Actinomycin-D, a transcriptional inhibitor, effectively blocked both LPS-inducible expression of MTA1 mRNA and protein (Fig. 1, C and D). These findings suggested that MTA1 may be a target of inflammation.
MTA1 Is an NF-B-responsive Gene-To directly test the notion that MTA1 is an inflammation-inducible gene, we next cloned the putative murine Mta1 promoter from mouse genomic DNA and generated a series of overlapping promoter fragments into a TATA-less, pGL3-luciferase (pGL3-luc) reporter system (supplemental Fig. 1A). We examined the inducibility of the Mta1 promoter deletion constructs by TNF-␣, the primary target of LPS (supplemental Fig. 1B). These experiments led to identification of the Mta1 minimal promoter, which consisted of Ϫ2872 to Ϫ5200. A close examination of the Mta1 minimal promoter revealed the presence of five NF-B consensus motifs: GGAAAGCCAG (Ϫ4761 to Ϫ4770), GAAAAC-CCCA (Ϫ3926 to Ϫ3935), TTCCCAGAGG (Ϫ3967 to Ϫ3996), AATTCCTCTG (Ϫ3986 to Ϫ3995), and AAGAGGGGTC (Ϫ2893 to Ϫ2902) (supplemental Fig. 1C), suggesting that in principle, MTA1 can be induced by inflammatory signals. Indeed, LPS (and TNF-␣) rapidly stimulated MTA1 transcription from the luc reporter system in Raw and in murine HC11 mammary epithelial cells ( Fig. 2A). As the goal of this study was to integrate the role of MTA1 during inducible inflammation, we used LPS as a physiologically relevant activator in the subsequent studies.
To understand the mechanism of LPS regulation of MTA1 expression, we found that blocking the NF-B pathway by either pharmacologic inhibitor parthenolide or IB␣-S12 (22), a specific dominant-negative mutant of IB, effectively inhibited LPS-mediated stimulation of Mta1 promoter activity in Raw cells (supplemental Fig. 2). As expected, LPS-mediated stimulation of MTA1 mRNA expression was also inhibited by parthenolide (Fig. 2B).
To gain a deeper insight into LPS stimulation of MTA1 transcription, we next used ChIP to examine the potential recruitment of p65 onto the Mta1 promoter. Although the Mta1 promoter contains five putative NF-B consensus motifs (supplemental Fig. 1C), LPS stimulation resulted in enhanced recruitment of p65 only to region 1 (Ϫ4570 to Ϫ4889) (Fig. 2C) and not to regions 2 (Ϫ3814 to Ϫ4152) and 3 (Ϫ2874 to Ϫ3207) (Fig. 2C). In addition, we also found recruitment of pol II, a marker of stimulated chromatin, to this region (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, we also found a distinct derecruitment of HDAC2 from region 1 of the Mta1 promoter upon LPS treatment (Fig. 2C). Similarly, p65⅐pol II complex was recruited only to region 1 of the Mta1 promoter as revealed by sequential double ChIP studies (Fig. 2D).
To demonstrate the functionality of the responsible NF-B motif in the Mta1 promoter, we next mutated the NF-B motif in region 1 of the Mta1 promoter-luc reporter and showed that both LPS and p65 fail to stimulate the Mta1 promoter-luc activity containing a mutant NF-B consensus motif (Fig. 2E). To demonstrate a potential direct binding of p65 to the mouse Mta1 promoter, we next performed EMSA using a 24-bp oligonucleotide encompassing the wild-type and mutant NF-B consensus sequence of Mta1 promoter and nuclear extracts from Raw cells with or without LPS stimulation. As expected from the preceding results, LPS stimulation of Raw cells promoted higher levels of p65⅐DNA complex formation than those in the unstimulated Raw cells. The specificity of the noted complex was verified by supershift experiments using anti-p65 or control IgG (Fig. 2F, lanes 4 -7) and by using MTA1 DNA probe with a defective NF-B consensus sequence that did not interact with the cellular p65 (lanes 8 -14). Together, these findings suggested that LPS stimulates MTA1 transcription via the NF-B pathway and that MTA1 is an NF-B-responsive gene.

MTA1 Is a Modifier of the LPS-inducible Genes in Stimulated
Macrophage-We next examined the possibility that MTA1 is a new modifier of NF-B signaling in LPS-stimulated macrophage. We found that selective siRNA-mediated knockdown of MTA1 in Raw cells impaired LPS-induced early activation of phospho-IKK␣ (Fig. 3A), IKK␣ kinase activity (Fig. 3B), and also delayed IB␣ phosphorylation and p65 phosphorylation as compared with those observed in cells transfected with the con-  trol siRNA (Fig. 3A). Consistent with these observations, there also was reduced binding of activated p65 to the NF-B consensus DNA element in LPS-stimulated MTA1 knockdown Raw cells as compared with control unstimulated cells (Fig. 3C). Similarly, we found an overall reduction in the activation of NF-B signaling components (Fig. 3E) and the DNA-binding ability of p65 (Fig. 3F) in LPS-stimulated MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Fig. 3D) as compared with those of LPS-stimulated wild-type MEFs. These findings suggested that MTA1 status is an important modifier of NF-B signaling in LPS-stimulated macrophages.
We next examined whether MTA1 exerts a modifying function on NF-B target genes in stimulated cells. We found that selective siRNA-mediated depletion of the endogenous MTA1 in Raw cells led to a significant fold reduction in LPS-induced expression of IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 as compared with those of siRNA control cells (Fig. 4A and supplemental Fig. 3A). Consistent with these findings, MTA1 knockdown in Raw cells reduced the efficacy of LPS-induced transcription of IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 from the basal level as compared with those in control siRNA-transfected cells, evaluated by the respective promoter luc reporters ( Fig. 4B and supplemental Fig. 3B). These findings implied that MTA1 may be important in achieving optimum induction of NF-B target genes by LPS, suggesting that MTA1 may play a modifying role in the responsiveness of macrophages to LPS. To directly evaluate this possibility, we next examined the effect of ectopic MTA1 expression on LPSmediated stimulation of IL-1␤ and TNF-␣ transcription using the respective promoter luc reporters (Fig. 4C). MTA1 expression in Raw cells potentiated the effect of LPS on NF-B target genes (IL-1␤ and TNF-␣) transcription as compared with what was observed in control vector-transfected cells. Similarly, MTA1 overexpression was accompanied by increased levels of LPS-mediated stimulation of IL-1␤ and TNF-␣ expression in Raw cells as compared with vector-transfected control cells (Fig. 4D).
To further examine the potential comodifying role of MTA1 in LPS-mediated stimulation of the NF-B target genes, we next examined whether LPS stimulation of macrophages also is accompanied by the recruitment of MTA1⅐pol II complex to NF-B target gene promoters. Using a ChIP-based promoter walk, we first established that indeed, MTA1 is recruited to region 3 (Ϫ780 to Ϫ1211) of the IL-1␤ promoter, region 3 (Ϫ467 to Ϫ819) of the MIP2 promoter, and region 1 (Ϫ555 to Ϫ940) of the TNF-␣ promoter (Fig. 5, A-C). We observed that in Raw cells, LPS stimulation promoted recruitment of the MTA1⅐pol II complex to the IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 promoters (Fig. 5D). Together, these results suggested that MTA1 behaves as a modifier of the LPS-inducible genes in the activated macrophages.

Revelation of Corepressor Activity of MTA1 on a Subset of NF-B-regulated Genes in Resting
Cells-During the course of the above studies, we consistently noticed that MTA1 knockdown in macrophages was accompanied by a distinct inhibition of the fold change in the levels of IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 upon LPS treatment compared with those in LPS-stimulated wildtype Raw cells (Fig. 4A). Most notably, in MTA1 knockdown cells, the mRNA basal levels of these NF-B-responsive genes and their basal promoter activity were elevated (supplemental Fig. 3). These findings raised an interesting possibility that MTA1 might act as a corepressor of NF-B target genes under basal, unstimulated conditions. Because MTA1 is part of the HDAC⅐NuRD corepressor complex, this hypothesis also was supported by our finding that LPS stimulation of macrophages was accompanied by derecruitment of the MTA1⅐ HDAC2 corepressor complexes from the LPS-inducible NF-B target gene chromatins: IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 genes (Fig.  5E). Together, these results suggested that 1) MTA1 may repress the basal transcription of a subset of LPS-regulated target genes owing to a constitutive recruitment of the MTA1⅐ HDAC2 complexes to the target promoter chromatin under unstimulated condition and 2) MTA1 acts as a comodifier of a subset of NF-B target genes in stimulated macrophages, probably owing to the release of HDAC2 from its target chromatin, probably, allowing the recruitment of pol II coactivator complexes to the target promoter chromatin. However, the precise nature of LPSresponsive components and associated protein modifications, which, in turn, might contribute to the noted recruitment of pol II coactivator complexes remains to be further investigated.
S-Nitrosylation of HDAC2 Abolishes Corepressor Activity of the MTA1⅐NuRD Complex-We next explored the notion that differential HDAC2 interaction with the NF-B target gene chromatin during basal and LPS-inducible conditions may influence the status of MTA1 being a corepressor or loss of corepressor activity. We examined the effect of LPS stimulation on the relative interaction of MTA1 with HDAC2. We found that LPS stimulation of Raw cells led to a decreased interaction between MTA1 and HDAC2 in spite of increased expression of MTA1 by LPS (Fig.  6A). While this study was in progress, Nott et al. have shown that growth factor stimulation of nitric oxide (NO) production, via inducible nitric-oxide synthase, induces S-nitrosylation of nuclear HDAC2. Nitrosylated HDAC2, as a result, is released from the chromatin, leading to the loss of corepressor function and the stimulation of target gene transcription (23). In this context, because inducible nitric oxide synthase also is an NF-B target gene (24), we discovered that LPS also stimulates S-nitrosylation of HDAC2 as detected by biotin switch assay (Fig. 6B, compare lane 2 with 1) and that nitrosylated HDAC2 modification could be inhibited by the inclusion of a pharmacological inducible nitric-oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME (Fig. 6B, compare lane 4 with 2). L-NAME also reversed the loss of interaction between HDAC2 and MTA1 in LPS-treated Raw cells (Fig. 6A). Consistent with the potential implication of S-nitrosylation of HDAC2 on the corepressor activity of the MTA1⅐HDAC2 complex, we found that LPS-mediated derecruitment of the MTA1⅐HDAC2 corepressor complex from the representative NF-B target gene promoters such as IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 promoter chromatin (Fig. 6C) could be effectively reversed by inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME. To implicate these molecular changes with the functionality of the MTA1⅐HDAC2 corepressor complex, we showed that indeed, treatment of Raw cells with L-NAME, which prevented the release of MTA1⅐HDAC2 corepressor complex from IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 promoters, also resulted in the failure in stimulating IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2-promoter activities by LPS (Fig. 6D) as well as expression of these LPS-inducible genes (Fig. 6E). Together, these findings suggest that the modulation of S-nitrosylation status of HDAC2 and its differential interaction with MTA1 in resting versus LPS-stimulated macrophages provides an explanation for the noted loss of corepressor behavior of MTA1 in activated macrophages.
MTA1 Modulation of Host Inflammatory and Septic Shock Responses-To confirm the possible differential effects of MTA1 knockdown under basal and LPS-stimulated conditions in a whole-animal setting, we used MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice, which were generated recently in our laboratory (25). We examined the levels of a subset of NF-B target genes in cultured peritoneal macrophages from wild-type and MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice treated with E. coli LPS for 4 h. We found that MTA1 deficiency led to increased basal expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1␤, TNF-␣, and MIP2 but not the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-6, presumably due to the loss of MTA1-associated corepressor function (Fig. 7A). As expected, LPS stimulation induced the expression of NF-B target genes in macrophages from both wild-type and MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice. The stimulation levels, however, appeared to be dramatic in macrophages derived from MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice. Nevertheless, because the basal levels of NF-B target genes were elevated in MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ macrophages compared with those of wild-type ones, fold change in cytokines expression between stimulated and basal in MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ macrophages were significantly lower than those of wild-type (Fig. 7A). Although these results apparently are paradoxical, they nevertheless are consistent with the findings in Raw cells and support the notion that MTA1 acts as a corepressor of a subset of the NF-B target genes under basal conditions but acts as a modifier of the some of these genes in LPSstimulated macrophages, suggesting a contribution of LPS-induced signals in the noted reversal of the basal corepressor activity.
To understand the impact of MTA1 deficiency on inflammatory responses, we examined the comparative susceptibility of MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice and wild-type mice to septic shock induced by E. coli LPS. Consistent with the findings of dramatic inflammatory response and increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines that mediates innate immune response, we observed a high rate of pronounced death of MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice within the first 40 h, whereas the wild-type mice survived during this period (Fig. 7B), presumably due to extremely high levels of circulating TNF-␣, at least as one of the mechanisms (Fig. 7C), revealing a maintenance role of MTA1 in inflammatory response. As expected given the increased baseline expression of cytokines in macrophages from MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice (Fig.  7A), the normal body temperature of MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice was ϳ1°C lower than the normal body temperature of the wild-type mice (Fig. 7D). Interestingly, LPS-induced septic shock triggered a further severe and lasting hypothermia in the MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice (body temperatures dropped to 27.3°C), whereas in the wild-type mice, body temperature dropped to only 29°C. However, the temperature returned to near the starting normal body temperature of 34°C after LPS-induced decrease in body temperate in the wild-type animals (Fig. 7E). These findings suggested that MTA1 levels may provide an inherent protection in mice from deregulated host inflammatory response under conditions of septic shock and bacterial infection.
In summary, the results presented here have identified a critical role of MTA1, both as a target and as a modifier of the FIGURE 7. MTA1 modulation of host inflammatory and septic shock responses. A, q-PCR analysis of indicated genes (data presented are in fold change) in macrophages isolated from either wild-type (MTA1 ϩ/ϩ ) or MTA1 knock-out (MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ ) mice treated with LPS for 2 h. B, survival rates of mice in h after intraperitoneal injection of LPS (10 mg/kg) (n ϭ 5 each group). C, estimation of TNF-␣ levels in circulation of wild-type or MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice before and after 2 h of LPS treatment by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. D, MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice showing significant difference in the base level body temperature as compared with those of the wildtype mice (n ϭ 19/group). E, effect of LPS on the body temperature of wild-type and MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice. All of the MTA1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice died after 18 h of LPS treatment. Data are shown as mean Ϯ S.D., n ϭ 3, *, p Ͻ 0.05, **, p Ͻ 0.001. NF-B pathway, in conferring an optimal, sufficient inflammatory response against bacterial infection. As a mechanism of MTA1 regulation of a subset of LPS-inducible proinflammatory cytokines, the MTA1⅐HDAC2 corepressor complex differentially interacts with and remodels the target gene chromatin under basal and LPS-stimulated conditions (Fig. 8). As a result, the noted regulation of MTA1 by inflammation and the impact of MTA1 on NF-B signaling and NF-B target gene chromatin remodeling most likely are involved in the overall outcome of NF-B signaling in macrophages. In conclusion, the findings presented here have identified a new regulatory layer of NF-B signaling during inflammation and indicate that MTA1 represents as a player in and modifier to the NF-B signaling network to, having a role in maintaining the homeostasis of inflammatory responses.