Regulation of the Activity of Lactate Dehydrogenases from Four Lactic Acid Bacteria*

  1. Tomas Fiedler3
  1. From the Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany,
  2. §BioQuant and
  3. **Center for Molecular Biology, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany,
  4. Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology, and Hygiene, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany,
  5. Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, MIB, The University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom, and
  6. ‡‡Synthetic Systems Biology, SILS, the University of Amsterdam, and Molecular Cell Physiology, FALW, Netherlands Institute for Systems Biology, VU University Amsterdam, NL-1018 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. 2 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 49-6221-533-247; Fax: 49-6221-533-298; E-mail: rebecca.wade{at}h-its.org.
  2. 3 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 49-381494-5916; Fax: 49-381494-5902; E-mail: tomas.fiedler{at}med.uni-rostock.de.
  1. 1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Background: Lactate dehydrogenases (LDHs) are key metabolic enzymes in lactic acid bacteria (LAB).

Results: The effects of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, phosphate, pH, and ionic strength on enzyme activity differ for six LDHs from four LAB.

Conclusion: The regulation of LDH activity differs among LAB.

Significance: These results have implications for understanding enzyme evolutionary adaptation, for quantitative comparative modeling, and for biotechnological application of LAB.

Abstract

Despite high similarity in sequence and catalytic properties, the l-lactate dehydrogenases (LDHs) in lactic acid bacteria (LAB) display differences in their regulation that may arise from their adaptation to different habitats. We combined experimental and computational approaches to investigate the effects of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (FBP), phosphate (Pi), and ionic strength (NaCl concentration) on six LDHs from four LABs studied at pH 6 and pH 7. We found that 1) the extent of activation by FBP (Kact) differs. Lactobacillus plantarum LDH is not regulated by FBP, but the other LDHs are activated with increasing sensitivity in the following order: Enterococcus faecalis LDH2 ≤ Lactococcus lactis LDH2 < E. faecalis LDH1 < L. lactis LDH1 ≤ Streptococcus pyogenes LDH. This trend reflects the electrostatic properties in the allosteric binding site of the LDH enzymes. 2) For L. plantarum, S. pyogenes, and E. faecalis, the effects of Pi are distinguishable from the effect of changing ionic strength by adding NaCl. 3) Addition of Pi inhibits E. faecalis LDH2, whereas in the absence of FBP, Pi is an activator of S. pyogenes LDH, E. faecalis LDH1, and L. lactis LDH1 and LDH2 at pH 6. These effects can be interpreted by considering the computed binding affinities of Pi to the catalytic and allosteric binding sites of the enzymes modeled in protonation states corresponding to pH 6 and pH 7. Overall, the results show a subtle interplay among the effects of Pi, FBP, and pH that results in different regulatory effects on the LDHs of different LABs.

Footnotes

  • * This work was supported by the Systems Biology of Microorganisms Network (SysMO) SysMO-LAB and SysMO-LAB2 projects with funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), the Klaus Tschira Foundation (to A. F.-S., V. C., and R. C. W.), the BIOMS Center for Modeling and Simulation in the Biosciences, Heidelberg (to A. F.-S.), and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council funding also of the Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology (to H. M. and H. W.; Grants BB/C008219/1, G530225/1, I017186/1, I004696/1, F003552/1), EU-FP7, and NWO.

  • Graphic This article contains supplemental Figs. S1 and S2 and Tables S1–S3.

  • Received January 31, 2013.
  • Revision received April 23, 2013.
| Table of Contents