Channel-anchored Protein Kinase CK2 and Protein Phosphatase 1 Reciprocally Regulate KCNQ2-containing M-channels via Phosphorylation of Calmodulin*

Background: Calmodulin binding to KCNQ subunit is required for maintaining the M-current. Results: Protein kinase CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM enhances KCNQ2 current. KCNQ2 subunit tethers protein kinase CK2 and protein phosphatase 1. Conclusion: Phosphorylation status of CaM regulates the M-current. Significance: Phosphorylation status of calmodulin regulates neuronal excitability via M-current modulation. M-type potassium channels, encoded by the KCNQ family genes (KCNQ2–5), require calmodulin as an essential co-factor. Calmodulin bound to the KCNQ2 subunit regulates channel trafficking and stabilizes channel activity. We demonstrate that phosphorylation of calmodulin by protein kinase CK2 (casein kinase 2) rapidly and reversibly modulated KCNQ2 current. CK2-mediated phosphorylation of calmodulin strengthened its binding to KCNQ2 channel, caused resistance to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate depletion, and increased KCNQ2 current amplitude. Accordingly, application of CK2-selective inhibitors suppressed KCNQ2 current. This suppression was prevented by co-expression of CK2 phosphomimetic calmodulin mutants or pretreatment with a protein phosphatase inhibitor, calyculin A. We also demonstrated that functional CK2 and protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) were selectively tethered to the KCNQ2 subunit. We identified a functional KVXF consensus site for PP1 binding in the N-terminal tail of KCNQ2 subunit: mutation of this site augmented current density. CK2 inhibitor treatment suppressed M-current in rat superior cervical ganglion neurons, an effect negated by overexpression of phosphomimetic calmodulin or pretreatment with calyculin A Furthermore, CK2 inhibition diminished the medium after hyperpolarization by suppressing the M-current. These findings suggest that CK2-mediated phosphorylation of calmodulin regulates the M-current, which is tonically regulated by CK2 and PP1 anchored to the KCNQ2 channel complex.

We have demonstrated previously that PKC-mediated phosphorylation of KCNQ2 subunit regulates KCNQ2-CaM binding (7). Interestingly, 15-40% of endogenous CaM is known to be phosphorylated (8,9), although the functional role of phosphorylated CaM on KCNQ2 channel remains unknown. Protein kinase CK2 (casein kinase 2) has been identified as key kinase for phosphorylating CaM (10,11). Various functional consequences of phosphorylated CaM have been demonstrated in a number of CaM-dependent proteins (10 -12) including the small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel 2, SK2 channel (13). However, because protein kinase CK2 is constitutively active and phosphorylates a wide range of proteins (14,15), it has long been considered to be engaged in housekeeping functions (14). This traditional view has been revised by recent studies, where CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM was shown to play an active role in muscarinic facilitation of long term potentiation in the hippocampus by modulating SK2 channel activity (16,17).
In this report, we demonstrate that CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM modulated KCNQ2 channel activity and facilitated CaM-KCNQ2 binding. We found that CK2 and protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) were selectively tethered to the KCNQ2 subunit. Accordingly, we identified the PP1 binding KVXF motif in the N-terminal of KCNQ2 subunit, which is not present in other KCNQ subunits. We demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of CK2 attenuated KCNQ2 current, whereas overexpression of phosphomimetic CaM enhanced KCNQ2 current. In superior cervical ganglion neurons, pharmacological inhibition of CK2 reduced the M-current corresponding to a decrease in apamin-resistant medium afterhyperpolarization (mAHP). These findings suggest that modulation of the phosphorylation status of CaM by CK2 is an important regulatory mechanism for the M-current.
Cell Culture and Transfection-Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293A cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) hm1 cells were grown in ␣-modified Eagle's medium with 5% fetal bovine serum and 500 g/ml G418 sulfate. HEK293A and CHO hm1 cells were transiently transfected with DNA plasmids using Trans-IT1 reagent (Mirus Bio, Madison, WI). Sympathetic cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons were isolated from 14 -19-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats and cultured according to the procedure described previously (18). Acquisition of primary cultures was done under the regulation of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University of California, Irvine. For SCG neuron transfection, mammalian expression plasmids were microinjected into the nucleus as described (18).
Immunoprecipitation-FLAG-tagged KCNQ2 channel complexes were immunoprecipitated from HEK293A cells that had been transiently transfected with combinations of relevant expression constructs as described (5,7). Briefly, cells were harvested 30 -48 h after transfection and lysed in HSE buffer 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, and Complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science). After centrifugation at 22,000 ϫ g for 15 min, supernatants were incubated with anti-FLAG antibody-conjugated beads. After washing with HSE buffer, bound proteins were eluted in SDS sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
CaM Purification from HEK293A Cells and in Vitro Dephosphorylation-His 6 /V5-tagged CaM, CaM-V5, was purified from transiently transfected HEK293A cells using phenyl-Sepharose 6 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare) (19) followed by Ni-NTA beads. Phosphate buffers (8) and phosphatase inhibitors were used to protect phosphorylated CaM. Cells were collected in a buffer containing 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na 3 VO 4 , 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and Complete protease inhibitor mixture. After freeze-thaw followed by Dounce homogenization, lysates were centrifuged at 22,000 ϫ g for 15 min. Supernatant was collected and adjusted to 1 mM CaCl 2 and then applied to a phenyl-Sepharose column. The column was washed with buffer A (50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and 1 mM CaCl 2 ) followed by buffer B (500 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl 2 , 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2)) and then with buffer C (0.1 mM CaCl 2 and 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2)). CaM was eluted in buffer D (1 mM EGTA and 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2)). His 6 -tagged CaM was further purified by incubating recovered CaM in buffer D with Ni-NTA beads followed by a wash with 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and then with T-HBS (0.2% Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4)). For dephosphorylation, His 6 -CaM-bound beads were briefly washed with PP buffer (100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl 2 , 20 mM ␤-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and incubated for 30 min at 30°C with PP. PP was removed by washes with T-HBS. For rephosphorylation, beads were further incubated with purified CK2 for 60 min at 30°C in a CK2 buffer containing 10 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM KCl, 10 mM ATP, 0.1 mg/ml polylysine, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na 3 VO 4 , and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). In some experiments, [␥-32 P]ATP was included to monitor phosphorylation of CaM. After a wash with T-HBS, CaM-V5 was eluted from Ni-NTA beads by an elution buffer containing 250 mM imidazole (pH 6.0), 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na 3 VO 4 and then pH was adjusted to 7.0 by adding Tris. These procedures provided a single band CaM-V5/His 6 in Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of SDS-PAGE (Ͼ95% purity).
CaM Purification from Escherichia coli-E. coli BL21 carrying pET-30a(ϩ)/CaM-V5 was sonicated in a lysis buffer (0.2% Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 mM imidazole, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na 3 VO 4 , and Complete mini protease inhibitor mixture). After centrifugation at 22,000 ϫ g for 15 min, lysates were incubated with Ni-NTA resin, followed by washes with the lysis buffer containing 30 mM imidazole. After a brief wash with T-HBS, CaM-bound Ni-NTA beads were incubated with CK2 and ATP for 60 min at 30°C in the CK2 buffer described above followed by washes with T-HBS. For dephosphorylation, CK2-treated CaM samples were further treated with PP and washed with T-HBS. [␥-32 P]ATP was included in some experiments to monitor phosphorylation status of CaM. CaM was eluted from Ni-NTA beads with the elution buffer described above. Because of an additional S-tag, CaM generated by E. coli migrates slower (ϳ30 kDa) in SDS-PAGE than CaM-V5 purified from HEK293A cells (ϳ23 kDa). These procedures provided CaM-His 6 /V5 with Ͼ95% purity.
In Vitro KCNQ2-CaM Binding Assay-FLAG-tagged fulllength KCNQ2 protein was purified from transiently transfected HEK293A cells as described above in the immunoprecipitation section except with an additional calcium wash (1 mM CaCl 2 ) to eliminate KCNQ2-bound CaM as we described previously (5). KCNQ2 beads and purified CaMs were incubated in HSE buffer containing 50 mM NaF and 1 mM Na 3 VO 4 for 1 h at 4°C. KCNQ2 beads were then washed with HSE, and bound CaM was assessed by immunoblotting.
GST Pulldown Assay-GST-KCNQ2 fusion proteins were purified from E. coli BL21 by glutathione-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) according to a standard procedure. After washes with PBS, purified KCNQ2(321-569) beads in HSE buffer were mixed with purified CaM and incubated for 1 h at 4°C. After washes with HSE buffer, bound CaM was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
GST-KCNQ2(1-59) or GST control proteins prebound to glutathione-Sepharose beads were mixed with 100 ng of pure PP1 protein, incubated for 90 min, washed with 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered Ca 2ϩ /Mg 2ϩ -free saline, and then eluted by heating in SDS sample buffer. HEK293 cell lysates were obtained by washing near confluent 10-cm plates with PBS and lysing in the buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1ϫ Complete protease inhibitor, 50 mM NaF) on ice, followed by incubation on ice with mixing for 30 min. After centrifugation (16,000 ϫ g) for 20 min, supernatant was added to glutathione beads precoated with wild-type and F24A mutant GST-KCNQ2(1-59). After a 3-h incubation with mixing at 4°C, beads were centrifuged and washed with lysis buffer, and bound proteins were eluted in SDS sample buffer.
Kinase Assay-CK2-specific kinase activities of KCNQ2-FLAG immunoprecipitate from one 10-cm dish/sample were measured using a CK2 substrate peptide (RRRDDDSDDD) (Millipore) and [␥- 32  2), and 500 nM FK506 with or without 500 nM calyculin A. After a 10-min incubation at 30°C, reactions were terminated by spotting aliquots on Whatman P81 phosphocellulose paper and washing with phosphoric acid. Blanks in the absence of substrate peptide were subtracted from all samples.

RESULTS
Our previous study indicates that the phosphorylation status of KCNQ2 protein regulates CaM binding (7). In this study, we investigated the role of CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM on KCNQ2 binding and its functional consequences. Because previous studies indicate that endogenous CaM can be phosphorylated by CK2 (8, 10), we examined whether dephosphorylation of CaM would change KCNQ2 binding properties.
To this end, we purified His 6 /V5-tagged CaM from HEK293A cells by phenyl-Sepharose followed by Ni-NTA resin. Purified CaM was then dephosphorylated by PP and tested for its binding ability to purified FLAG-tagged KCNQ2 protein in vitro. Dephosphorylation of CaM diminished KCNQ2 binding (Fig.  1A). This reduced KCNQ2 binding was restored by rephosphorylation of CaM by purified CK2 (Fig. 1A).
To confirm the roles of CK2-mediated phosphorylation in CaM-KCNQ2 binding, we performed similar in vitro binding experiments using CaM produced in E. coli, which lacks endogenous CK2 (20). His 6 /V5-tagged CaM generated in E. coli was purified using Ni-NTA beads followed by CK2 treatment and then tested for its binding to full-length KCNQ2-FLAG protein purified from HEK293A cells. CK2 phosphorylation of CaM increased its binding to KCNQ2 protein, which was abolished by further dephosphorylation of CaM by PP (Fig. 1B). To confirm that these changes were not intervened by other mammalian proteins co-purified with the KCNQ2 channel complex, we examined CaM binding with E. coli-generated GST fusion protein containing the C-terminal tail of KCNQ2, GST-Q2(321-569). CK2-phosphorylated CaM-His 6 /V5 purified from E. coli showed increased binding to GST-Q2(321-569) protein (Fig.  1C). These results suggest that CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM enhances its binding to KCNQ2 protein.
Three residues in CaM have been identified as physiological CK2 phosphorylation acceptor sites (9,13,21): threonine 80, serine 82, and serine 102. We generated a phosphomimetic mutation of CaM in which all three phosphorylation sites were substituted with aspartate, CaM(3D). As expected, CaM(3D) purified from E. coli without any treatment showed enhanced binding to KCNQ2, similar to that of CK2-phosphorylated CaM (Fig. 1C).
To identify the critical residue within these three CK2 phosphorylation sites, we co-expressed single residue aspartate or alanine mutants of CaM with KCNQ2 channel in HEK293A cells and tested their binding by co-immunoprecipitation (Fig.  1D). Any single aspartate mutations increased KCNQ2 binding to an extent similar to that of CaM(3D). This observation is consistent with a previous report that single aspartate mutation facilitates phosphorylation of other sites in mammalian cells (11). However, co-immunoprecipitation assays using alaninesubstituted mutants identified Thr-80 as the critical residue (Fig. 1E), which showed reduced binding, similar to that of the three alanine-substituted mutant, CaM(3A). These results suggest that phosphorylation of CaM(Thr-80) is key for CaM binding to KCNQ2.
Because CK2 is constitutively active, some CK2-mediated regulation is known to be controlled through microdomains generated by channel complexes (13). To test whether KCNQ2 channel uses this mechanism, we co-expressed HA-tagged CK2␣ subunit with KCNQ2-FLAG and examined whether it was co-precipitated with the KCNQ2-FLAG protein. As expected, CK2␣ protein was detected in KCNQ2 immunoprecipitates ( Fig. 2A). In contrast, neither Kv1.2-FLAG nor KCNQ3-FLAG co-immunoprecipitated CK2␣ ( Fig. 2A). Consistent with these results, CK2 kinase activity was detected selectively in KCNQ2 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2B). This CK2 kinase activity was completely abolished in the presence of a CK2-selective inhibitor, 50 M TBCA, confirming that the detected kinase activity was derived from CK2 (Fig. 2B). These findings indicate that the KCNQ2 channel complex contains functional CK2.

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 11539
could be attributed to binding through endogenous AKAP79 (24) that associates with KCNQ channels (18).
Because KCNQ2-anchored PP1 is the best candidate to counteract CK2-mediated phosphorylation in the KCNQ2 channel complex, we examined the effects of KCNQ2-anchored PP1 on CK2 activity. To test this, we measured CK2 activity in KCNQ2 immunoprecipitates in a PP1 permissive condition and examined whether a PP1 inhibitor, calyculin A, could increase kinase activity. As expected, CK2 activity was increased to 162.4 Ϯ 25% (n ϭ 4) by adding calyculin A (Fig. 3E). These results indicate that KCNQ2-anchored PP1 counteracts phosphorylation mediated by KCNQ2-anchored CK2.
We next investigated functional roles of CK2-mediated CaM regulation on KCNQ2 channel. Because TBB has been widely used in cellular experiments (14,16,17), we tested the effect of TBB on KCNQ2 current. TBB rapidly suppressed KCNQ2 current (Fig. 4, A and B). This suppression was attenuated by calyculin A (Fig. 4, A and B). In addition, overexpression of CaM(3D) attenuated TBB response to a degree similar to that of calyculin A-treated cells (Fig. 4, C and E), which suggests that the TBB effect occurred through phosphorylated CaM. Similar results were obtained with TBCA (Fig. 4, D and E), which supports the idea that this KCNQ2 current suppression is a result of CK2 inhibition rather than off-target effects of these compounds. Concomitantly, immunoprecipitation showed a reduction in KCNQ2-bound CaM in TBB-and TBCA-treated cells (Fig. 4F). Furthermore, KCNQ2-bound CaM(3D) was not affected by TBB or TBCA treatment (Fig. 4G), which supports the idea that these changes are because of the phosphorylation status of CaM. Collectively, these results suggest that CK2 inhibitors promote dephosphorylation of KCNQ2-bound CaM, which destabilizes CaM binding to KCNQ2 subunit and causes current suppression.
CaM is known to engage in KCNQ2 channel trafficking (6). Therefore, the observed enhanced KCNQ2 currents may be attributed to a change in membrane trafficking of the KCNQ2 subunit. However, our previous studies (5, 7) suggest that increased CaM-KCNQ2 binding enhanced KCNQ2 currents by stabilizing PIP 2 affinity of KCNQ2 subunit. Because CK2 inhibitors suppressed KCNQ2 current within 10 s (Fig. 4B), we reasoned that it would be too rapid to explain the current suppression exclusively by KCNQ2 channel trafficking. Thus, we examined whether phospho-CaMs modify susceptibility of the channel to PIP 2 depletion to maintain KCNQ2 current. Voltage-sensitive phosphatase (VSP) is a unique phosphatase that degrades PIP 2 upon membrane depolarization. It has been widely used to investigate PIP 2 sensitivity of ion channels including KCNQ2 channel (5,(25)(26)(27)(28). In addition, KCNQ2 is optimal for this assay because KCNQ2 current per se does not inactivate during prolonged depolarization steps (Fig. 5C). Coexpression of VSP from Cinona intestinalis, Ci-VSP, with KCNQ2(WT) channel induced voltage-dependent current decay of KCNQ2 current because of PIP 2 depletion as reported previously (5,29). When we compared KCNQ2 current decays at ϩ30 mV, co-expression of CaM(3D) protected KCNQ2 current from VSP-induced current decay (Fig. 5, D and E). In addition, KCNQ2(F24A) ϩ CaM(WT) current showed slower current decay compared with that of KCNQ2(WT) (Fig. 5, D and  E). These results suggest that KCNQ2 channel with CK2-phosphorylated CaM is more resistant to PIP 2 depletion. This resistance to PIP 2 depletion observed in KCNQ2 currents co-expressed with phosphomutants of CaM or KCNQ2(F24A) (Fig. 5E) were closely correlated with their current densities (r 2 ϭ 0.902, p ϭ 0.036) (Fig. 5B), as well as relative CaM binding to KCNQ2 channel (r 2 ϭ 0.829, p ϭ 0.042) (Fig. 1,  D and E). Such intercorrelation among KCNQ2 current density, CaM-KCNQ2 binding, and sensitivity to PIP 2 depletion is consistent with our previous observations that KCNQ2-CaM association facilitates PIP 2 efficacy for maintaining functional KCNQ2 channels (7).
It has been shown that CK2 phosphorylation changes calcium sensitivity of the SK2 channel (13). To evaluate the effect of phosphorylated CaM on calcium sensitivity of KCNQ2 current, we co-expressed CaM(3D) with KCNQ2 channel and measured calcium responses induced by 1 M ionomycin as we described previously (5). Co-expression of CaM(3D) did not alter ionomycin induced responses (Fig. 6).
Finally, we evaluated the role of CK2 on M-current regulation in rat SCG sympathetic neurons. Application of TBB onto SCG neurons reduced the M-current (Fig. 7, A and B). Similarly to what we observed in CHO cells, suppression of the M-cur-rent was attenuated by calyculin A pretreatment. When CaM(3D) was overexpressed, SCG neurons showed attenuated M-current response to TBB as we observed in CHO cells (Fig.  7C). Because the M-current contributes to the mAHP, we examined how CK2 inhibition affected mAHP (Fig. 7, D-F). The mAHP was partially suppressed by apamin, indicating the contribution of SK channels as expected. TBB reduced apaminresistant mAHP. Subsequent application of XE991, an M-current blocker, completely eliminated residual mAHP, indicating that TBB-induced reduction of mAHP was exclusively generated by XE991-sensitive current (Fig. 7, D-F). These results suggest that CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM regulates mAHP in SCG neurons.

DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrates that CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM facilitated its binding to KCNQ2 and enhanced channel activities. We also demonstrate that CK2 and PP1 were anchored to the KCNQ2 subunit, providing tonic regulation for protein phosphorylation. Accordingly, application of CK2 inhibitors decreased KCNQ2-bound CaM and suppressed KCNQ2 current. Consistent with our hypothesis that KCNQ2-CaM interaction regulates PIP 2 sensitivity of KCNQ2 channel (5,7), CK2 inhibitor decreased the amount of KCNQ2anchored CaM and increased channel susceptibility to PIP 2 depletion. Thus, CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM is a novel mechanism that regulates PIP 2 susceptibility of the M-channel. CK2-mediated CaM phosphorylation has been shown to modify CaM-dependent processes with variable effects depending on the enzymes affected (10 -12). For instance, phosphodiesterase exhibits lower binding affinity to phosphorylated CaM without affecting its V max (10). In contrast, the endothelial NO synthetase shows a reduced V max in the presence of phosphorylated CaM without changing its affinity for phosphorylated CaM (11). Regarding the effect of CaM phosphorylation on ion channels, detailed analysis has been described for the SK2 small conductance calcium-activated potassium channels (13,16,17). CK2 phosphomimetic CaM induces rightward shift of calciumdependent activation curve for SK2 channel, which leads to a reduced SK2 channel activity (13). This change in calcium sensitivity by phosphomimetic CaM makes a clear contrast to the KCNQ2 channel, in which co-expression of phosphomimetic CaM does not change calcium sensitivity. This difference is interesting because phosphorylation of CaM(Thr-80) plays a key role for both channels (13). Because CaM(Thr-80) locates outside the EF hand motifs (10) and phosphorylation of Thr-80 per se does not change calcium sensitivity of CaM (11), the observed difference may be derived from a channel-specific role for CaM. In fact, the SK2 channel is activated by calciumbound CaM, whereas calcium-free CaM has been identified as the preferred binding form for the KCNQ2 channel (1,5,30). Because CK2-phosphorylated CaM modulates KCNQ2 current independent of cellular calcium, CaM can be considered to be a phosphorylation sensor for the KCNQ2 channel.
CK2 is enriched in the axon initial segment, where KCNQ2 subunits are clustered (31,32). Thus, subcellular compartments could be a potential mechanism for the facilitation of CK2 activity surrounding the M-channel. However, we found that KCNQ2 subunit selectively tethers CK2 and PP1. These  anchored enzymes were active in KCNQ2 immunoprecipitates. Thus, it is likely that the balance between anchored CK2 and PP1 tonically regulates the phosphorylation status of CaM in the vicinity of KCNQ2 subunits. Similarly, SK2 channels anchor CK2 and protein phosphatase 2B (13). Thus, co-existence of CK2 and protein phosphatase in target protein complexes is a fundamental mechanism to regulate CK2-mediated phosphorylation. However, it has been shown that norepinephrine facilitates phosphorylation of SK2-anchored CaM but not KCNQ2-anchored CaM (17), indicating distinct regulations of CaM phosphorylation at these channels.
We identified the KVXF motif that is responsible for anchoring PP1 to the KCNQ2 subunit. However, a KCNQ2-associated protein, AKAP79/150, also binds PP1 (24). Interestingly, AKAP79/150 interaction has been demonstrated to suppress PP1 activity (24), whereas PP1 bound to the KVXF motif maintains its phosphatase activity (33). These different modes of PP1 association should provide additional regulation for PP1 activity at the KCNQ channel complex, substrates of which may not be limited to CaM.
Functionally, application of CK2 inhibitors suppressed KCNQ2 current as well as the M-current, which led to a reduction in mAHP. These effects of CK2 inhibitors were negated by a pretreatment with PP1 inhibitors as expected. Furthermore, a PP1-deficient mutant, KCNQ2(F24A) or overexpression of CaM(3D) with KCNQ2 channel were resistant to CK2 inhibitors. These pieces of evidence suggest that CK2 inhibitors modulate KCNQ2 and M-currents through changes in the phosphorylation status of CaM.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that CK2-mediated phosphorylation of CaM regulates the M-current by facilitating its binding to KCNQ2, hence modulating mAHP. This pathway may present a novel important regulatory mechanism to control neuronal excitability.