Cross-talk between Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and the Inflammatory Response

Background: Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a protein regulating differentiation and function of immune cells. Results: NF-κB activates transcription of AhR and enhances activity of AhR-regulated genes. Conclusion: Activation of NF-κB involves RelA-mediated expression of AhR. Significance: Inflammatory stimuli and cytokines that regulate NF-κB induce AhR expression during activation and differentiation of immune cells. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is involved in the regulation of immune responses, T-cell differentiation, and immunity. Here, we show that inflammatory stimuli such as LPS induce the expression of AhR in human dendritic cells (DC) associated with an AhR-dependent increase of CYP1A1 (cytochrome P4501A1). In vivo data confirmed the elevated expression of AhR by LPS and the LPS-enhanced 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-mediated induction of CYP1A1 in thymus of B6 mice. Inhibition of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) repressed both normal and LPS-enhanced, TCDD-inducible, AhR-dependent gene expression and canonical pathway control of RelA-regulated AhR-responsive gene expression. LPS-mediated induction of AhR was NF-κB-dependent, as shown in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from Rel null mice. AhR expression and TCDD-mediated induction of CYP1A1 was significantly reduced in RelA-deficient MEF compared with wild type MEF cells and ectopic expression of RelA restored the expression of AhR and induction of CYP1A1 in MEF RelA null cells. Promoter analysis of the human AhR gene identified three putative NF-κB-binding elements upstream of the transcription start site. Mutation analysis of the AhR promoter identified one NF-κB site as responsible for mediating the induction of AhR expression by LPS and electrophoretic shift assays demonstrated that this NF-κB motif is recognized by the RelA/p50 heterodimer. Our results show for the first time that NF-κB RelA is a critical component regulating the expression of AhR and the induction of AhR-dependent gene expression in immune cells illustrating the interaction of AhR and NF-κB signaling.

The AhR 2 is a member of basic helix-loop-helix-PAS (Per-ARNT-Sim) transcription factors, including Per (period), ARNT (AhR nuclear translocator), and Sim (single-minded), regulating hypoxia, circadian rhythm, and cellular processes such as differentiation and apoptosis. Similar to its murine ortholog, the human AhR promoter bears multiple transcription initiation sites that are clustered in a GC-rich region and contains neither TATA nor CCAAT boxes (1)(2)(3). The GC-rich region includes four consensus sequences for Sp-1 binding sites, which seem to be necessary for basal expression of the AhR-promoter construct.
There is increasing evidence showing that the AhR plays an important role in regulating immune responses and that exposure to AhR-activating toxicants contributes to the development of immune disorders (4). The AhR affects the expression of immunoregulatory genes and the function as well as differentiation of inflammatory DC (5)(6)(7)(8). Furthermore, recent reports show that the AhR plays a critical role in T-cell differentiation and immunity of the gut (9 -12), but the molecular mechanisms that control its activity in immune cells during inflammation have remained unclear. Immunohistochemical analysis of embryonic tissues showed that AhR expression is developmentally regulated (13). Stimulation of resting T cells with mitogens resulted in a marked increase of AhR expression (14,15), whereas TGF-␤ inhibits or increases the expression of AhR and genes of the AhR gene battery in a cell-specific manner (16,17).
In this study, we elucidated the molecular mechanisms responsible for regulating AhR expression during inflammatory responses. We demonstrate for the first time that LPS markedly induces AhR expression through activation of RelA and binding of RelA/p50 to an NF-B binding site identified in the human AhR gene promoter.
Animals and Treatment-Male C57BL/6J wild type (WT) mice, 8 weeks old, purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (West Sacramento, CA). Male mice were housed (four per cage) in a selective pathogen-free facility and humidity-and temperature-controlled room. Ahr null mice (Ahr Ϫ/Ϫ ) were a kind gift of Christopher Bradfield (University of Wisconsin). The animals were maintained on a 12:12 h light/dark cycle and had free access to water and food according to the guidelines set by the University of California Davis. Mice were allowed to adapt to the facility for 1 week. TCDD and LPS were administered via a single intraperitoneal injection. TCDD was prepared from a stock solution and diluted in corn oil. A stock solution of LPS was prepared in water. Control animals received an equal amount of corn oil (5 ml/kg) or water alone. C57BL/6J and Ahr Ϫ/Ϫ mice received a single dose of 15 g/kg TCDD for 24 h. After 18 h of TCDD treatment, mice were injected with a dose of 250 g/kg LPS. Four animals from each group were killed, and organs were excised, weighed, and, if not otherwise stated, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at Ϫ80°C for analysis.
Cloning of the Human AhR Promoter and Site-directed Mutagenesis-The promoter region of human AhR was generated by PCR amplification of genomic DNA isolated from the human colon carcinoma cell line LS180 as described previously (17). The luciferase expression plasmid under control of the human AhR promoter was termed pGL3-hAhRP, including 5640 nt upstream of the putative start site (17). To produce deletion constructs of pGL3-hAhRP, the clone was digested with KpnI and several endonucleases (EcoRV, EcoRI, NdeI, SauI, ApaI) that possess single recognition sequences within the full-length construct and are termed AhR⌬(Ϫ2510), AhR⌬(Ϫ1980), AhR⌬(Ϫ1892), AhR⌬(Ϫ881), and AhR⌬(Ϫ120), respectively (17). DNA promoter analysis of the human AhR gene was performed using the TFSEARCH program (19) and identified three putative NF-B binding sites. Mutation of these three NF-B sequences in the human AhR gene promoter (at Ϫ2757 bp 5Ј-GGGGAATTTC-3Ј, at Ϫ1452 bp 5Ј-GGGAATTTGC-3Ј, and at Ϫ399 bp 5Ј-GGAAACTCCT-3Ј) was carried out by site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using the following primers synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (Coralville,   IA): NF-B M1 mutant, 5Ј-TGGGGAGGAAGGTACCTTTCA-TGCAGACTG-3Ј; NF-B M2 mutant, 5Ј-TACACTGTCTTC-TTTGGTACCTTGCTCCATCTTTTTCCTT-3Ј; and NF-B  M3 mutant, 5Ј-AAAAGGTCAAGGTACCTCCTAGCCTTC-AAG-3Ј. Insertion of the mutated bases (underlined) was confirmed by sequencing. Expression vectors for p50 and RelA were kindly provided by W. Greene (J. David Gladstone Institute, San Francisco, CA), and the RelB expression plasmid was kindly provided by U. Siebenlist (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Cell Culture, Transfection Experiments, and Luciferase Assay-Primary MEFs were isolated from 14-day post coitus wild type, Rel null B6 mice, and Ahr Ϫ/Ϫ B6 mouse embryos as described (20 -22). Embryos were surgically removed and separated from maternal tissues and the yolk sack. The bodies were minced finely and then incubated in a solution of trypsin and EDTA (0.05% trypsin; 1 mM EDTA) at 37°C for 30 min. The supernatant was centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 ϫ g. The resulting pellet was resuspended in culture medium, and cells were plated in 100-mm culture dishes. Primary MEFs were maintained in DMEM:F12 (Invitrogen). Cell culture medium contained 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 units of penicillin and 100 g/ml streptomycin. Human monocyte-derived DC were generated from CD14 ϩ monocytes freshly isolated from healthy individuals as described previously (23). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 50 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM HEPES, 10% endotoxin-free fecal calf serum, recombinant human GM-CSF, and IL-4 (1000 units/ml each) for 7 days. The human monocytic cell line U937 was obtained from ATCC and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium. To generate DC, U937 cells were cultured for 2 days in growth medium supplemented with GM-CSF (20 ng/ml) and IL-4 (40 ng/ml) as described previously (8). Transfection of plasmid DNA or siRNA into U937derived DC was performed via Nucleofector technology as described (24). Briefly, 10 6 U937-derived DC were resuspended in 100 l of Nucleofector Solution V (Amaxa GmbH, Köln, Germany) and nucleofected with 1.0 g of plasmid DNA or siRNA using program V-001, which is preprogrammed into the Nucleofector device (Amaxa GmbH). siRNA to target human RelA and a negative control siRNA were synthesized by Qiagen. For transient transfection of MEF, cells were plated in 24-well plates (1 ϫ 10 5 cells per well) and transfected using jetPEI (Poly-Transfection; Qbiogene, Irvine, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 0.3 g of the RelA construct was suspended in 25 l of 150 mM sterile NaCl solution. Also, 0.3 l of jetPEI solution was suspended in 25 l of 150 mM sterile NaCl solution. The jetPEI/NaCl solution was then added to the DNA/NaCl solution and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The medium in the wells was changed to fresh medium, and 50 l of the DNA/jetPEI was added to each well. The transfection was allowed to proceed for 24 h, and cells were treated with 10 nM TCDD or 0.1% Me 2 SO (control) for 6 h. To control the transfection efficiency, cells were cotransfected with 0.1 g per well ␤-galactosidase reporter construct. Luciferase activities were measured with the luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) using a luminometer (Berthold Lumat LB 9501/16; Pittsburgh, PA). Relative light units were normalized to ␤-galactosidase activity and to protein concentration, using Bradford dye assay (Bio-Rad).
EMSA-Nuclear extracts were isolated from U937 cells as described previously (24). In brief, 5 ϫ 10 6 cells were treated with LPS or TCDD for 90 min and harvested in Dulbecco's PBS containing 1 mM PMSF and 0.05 g/l of aprotinin. After centrifugation, the cell pellets were gently resuspended in 1 ml of hypotonic buffer (20 mM HEPES, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM Na 3 VO 4 , 1 mM Na 4 P 2 O 7 , 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 0.13 M okadaic acid, 1 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.9, and 1 g/ml each leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin). The cells were allowed to swell on ice for 15 min and then homogenized by 25 strokes of a Dounce homogenizer. After centrifugation for 1 min at 16,000 ϫ g, nuclear pellets were resuspended in 300 l ice-cold high-salt buffer (hypotonic buffer with 420 mM NaCl, and 20% glycerol). The samples were passed through a 21-gauge needle and stirred for 30 min at 4°C. The nuclear lysates were microcentrifuged at 16,000 ϫ g for 20 min, aliquoted, and stored at Ϫ80°C. DNA-protein binding reactions were carried out in a total volume of 15 l containing 10 g of nuclear protein, 60,000 cpm of double-stranded DRE consensus oligonucleotide 25 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 5% glycerol, and 1 g of poly(dI⅐dC). The samples were incubated at room temperature for 20 min. Competition experiments were performed in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled DNA fragments. Protein-DNA complexes were resolved on a 4% nondenaturating polyacrylamide gel and visualized by exposure of the dried gels to x-ray films. Protein-DNA complexes were quantified using a Chemi-Imager TM 4400 (Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA).
Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR-Total RNA was isolated from cells using a Quick-RNA Mini prep isolation kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA), and cDNA synthesis was done as described previously (24). Quantitative detection of ␤-actin and differentially expressed genes was performed with a LightCycler LC480 Instrument (Roche Diagnostics) using the Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primers for each gene were designed on the basis of the respective cDNA or mRNA sequences using OLIGO primer analysis software provided by Steve Rozen and the Whitehead Institute/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Genome Research so that the targets were 100 -200 bp in length (Table 1). PCR amplification was carried out in a total volume of 20 l containing 2 l of cDNA, 10 l of 2ϫ Fast SYBR Green Master Mix, and 0.2 M of each primer. The PCR cycling conditions were 95°C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 3 s and 60°C for 30 s. Detection of the fluorescent product was performed at the end of the 72°C extension period. Negative controls were concomitantly run to confirm that the samples were not cross-contaminated. A sample with DNase-and RNase-free water instead of RNA was concomitantly examined for each of the reaction units described above. To confirm the amplification specificity, the PCR products were subjected to melting curve analysis.
Western Blot Analysis-To analyze the level of AhR and CYP1A1 protein in human DC, whole cell protein (25 g) was separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and blotted onto a polyvinylidine difluoride membrane (Immuno-Blot; Bio-Rad). The antigen-antibody complexes were visualized using the chemoluminescence substrate SuperSignal West Pico (Pierce) as recommended by the manufacturer.
Statistical Analysis-All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times, and data are expressed as mean Ϯ S.D. Differences were considered significant at p Ͻ 0.05. A comparison of two groups was made with an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test. A comparison of multiple groups was made with analysis of variance followed by a Dunnett's or Tukey's test.

LPS-induced Expression of AhR and CYP1A1 in Human DC
and Thymus of B6 Mice-Treatment of human DC derived from whole blood with LPS for 24 h significantly induced the expression of AhR mRNA of ϳ3-fold compared with control ( Fig. 1A). TCDD had no significant effect on AhR mRNA expression in human DC. LPS also increased the background expression of CYP1A1 by ϳ2.5-fold and further elevated TCDD-induced expression of CYP1A1 to 85-fold compared with a 25-fold increase of CYP1A1 by TCDD in the absence of LPS. Furthermore, while LPS induced the expression of AhR and CYP1A1 mRNA in the thymus of B6 wt mice (Fig. 1B), it failed to do so in the thymus of Ahr Ϫ/Ϫ mice (Fig. 1C). Similar to human DC, treatment with LPS significantly increased the TCDD-induced expression of CYP1A1 in the thymus of B6 mice (Fig. 1B). To monitor the expression level of AhR mRNA during inflammation, U937-derived DC were activated with LPS for 1 to 24 h. Maximal LPS-dependent induction of AhR (ϳ4.5-fold above control) was found after 12 h of LPS treatment in human U937 DC. The increase in AhR by LPS occurred concomitantly with a 2-fold increase of CYP1A1 mRNA at 6 and 12 h and reached a maximum of a 3-fold increase of CYP1A1 mRNA at 24 h (Fig. 1D). The expression of ARNT did not significantly change after treatment with TCDD or LPS in DC or thymus. Western blot analysis confirmed that the LPS-induced mRNA expression of AhR and CYP1A1 also occurred at the protein level, showing increased level of AhR and CYP1A1 at 6 and 24 h in whole cell lysates of human DC (Fig. 1E). EMSA with nuclear extracts from U937-derived DC revealed that the LPSinduced expression of AhR is associated with a small increase in protein-DRE complex formation in LPS-treated cells compared

Reverse primer (5-3)
GGCCACTTTGACCCTTACAA CAGGTAACGGAGGACAGGAA with control cells (Fig. 1F, lanes 1 and 3). Similar to the enhanced CYP1A1 mRNA expression in TCDD-treated DC and thymus of TCDD-treated B6 mice, LPS incubation led to an enhanced TCDD-induced protein-DNA complex formation (Fig. 1F, lane 4). EMSA supershift analysis revealed that the enhanced protein-DNA complex observed in the presence of TCDD and LPS contained both AhR and ARNT (Fig. 1G, lanes  5 and 6). AhR Expression Is Regulated by NF-B RelA-To determine whether activation of AhR by LPS is NF-B-dependent, U937derived DC were pretreated for 30 min with the NF-B inhibitor PDTC or water as vehicle. LPS had no significant effect on the expression of AhR or CYP1A1 when cells were preincubated with PDTC ( Fig. 2A), indicating a requirement for NF-B to stimulate AhR gene expression in LPS-treated cells. Our results examining DRE luciferase reporter (containing the DRE1 sequence of the rat Cyp1a1 gene promoter region Ϫ1029 to Ϫ997) activity in U937-derived DC show that LPS enhances the TCDD-induced DRE-dependent luciferase activity (Fig.  2B). We further examined what role NF-B might play in the LPS enhancement effect as well as in AhR-dependent gene expression. The optimal treatment conditions for NF-B inhibition were determined to be 200 M PDTC, 50 M CAPS, and 5 g/ml CAPE for 30 min (data not shown) before treatment with 10 nM TCDD. Not only did each NF-B inhibitor block the LPS enhancement effect, they also reduced the magnitude of induction of luciferase by TCDD alone. These results further support a role for NF-B in normal AhR-dependent signal transduction as well as in the LPS enhancement effect (Fig. 2B). These results confirm that the repressive effect of NF-B inhibitors on AhR-dependent gene expression is DRE-dependent. Furthermore, gene silencing of RelA decreased the expression of AhR and suppressed the TCDD-induced and LPS-enhanced expression of CYP1A1 in U937-derived DC (Fig. 2C). The protein level of RelA was significantly reduced by gene silencing using RelA-specific siRNA (Fig. 2D).
To test which NF-B subunit mediates the induction of AhR by LPS, we utilized MEFs deficient in RelA and RelB controlling the canonical and non-canonical NF-B signaling pathway. MEF cells derived from WT, AhR-, RelA-, and RelB-deficient mice were treated with LPS and TCDD for 6 h. As shown in DC, LPS up-regulated the expression of AhR (2.2-fold) and CYP1A1 (4.5-fold) in WT MEFs as well as in RelB Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs (Fig. 3A). In contrast, LPS did not significantly increase the expression of AhR or CYP1A1 in RelA Ϫ/Ϫ or Ahr Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs. Furthermore, the constitutive expression of AhR was drastically reduced by ϳ90% and the TCDD-induced expression of CYP1A1 was suppressed by 60% in RelA Ϫ/Ϫ MEF compared with WT MEF (Fig.  3, A and B), which was also confirmed on protein level in Western blot analysis (Fig. 3, E and F). The expression of ARNT did not significantly change after treatment with TCDD or LPS in MEFs (Fig. 3C). Transient transfection of RelA Ϫ/Ϫ MEF with a RelA expression plasmid for 24 h increased the basal expression of AhR (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, the LPS-dependent induction of AhR expression and enhanced CYP1A1 expression by TCDD was restored in MEF RelA Ϫ/Ϫ cells after transient transfection with a RelA expression vector (pRelA) for 24 h and incubation with TCDD or LPS for 6 h (Fig. 3D).
Identification of NF-B Binding Sites on the AhR Promoter-DNA promoter analysis of the 5Ј-upstream regulatory region of the human AhR gene using the TFSEARCH program (19) revealed three putative NF-B binding sites, AhR-NF-B1 at Ϫ2757 bp, AhR-NF-B2 at Ϫ1452 bp, and AhR-NF-B3 at Ϫ399 bp within the 5Ј-upstream regulatory region of the AhR gene (Fig. 4A). To examine the role that these NF-B binding sites may play in the regulation of AhR gene expression, trans-   fection experiments were carried out with deletion reporter constructs of the AhR promoter. Our data revealed that only the full length promoter containing 5640 nt upstream of the putative start site of the AhR promoter is sufficient to induce promoter activity by LPS in human U937 DC (Fig. 4B). The reporter activity of the deletion constructs AhR⌬(Ϫ2510), AhR⌬(Ϫ881), or AhR⌬(Ϫ120) was not significantly increased by LPS, indicating the importance of the distal upstream AhR-NF-B1 site in regulating this response. Promoter studies with mutations of each of the three AhR-NF-B sites revealed that only mutation of the AhR-NF-B1 site eliminated the LPS-induced AhR promoter response (Fig. 4C). A mutation in the AhR-NF-B2 site reduced the LPS-mediated AhR activity by ϳ20%, but the effect was not statistically significant. Mutation of the AhR-NF-B3 at Ϫ399 bp had no significant effect on LPS-induced AhR gene promoter activity.
Enhanced Binding of RelA to an NF-B Binding Element of the Human AhR Promoter-Because RelA is a subunit of the NF-B family that binds to NF-B consensus sequences, we examined the binding of RelA to each of the three putative NF-B elements from the human AhR gene promoter. Using nuclear extracts of U937 DC results from EMSA show that LPS stimulates NF-B binding to DNA containing the AhR-NF-B1 site (Fig. 5A, lane 10). NF-B DNA binding to the AhR-NF-B3 element was slightly reduced by LPS (lane 2), whereas binding to the AhR-NF-B2 site was unaffected by LPS treatment (lane 6). Supershift analyses with RelA-specific antibodies revealed that RelA binds to the AhR-NF-B1 element present in the upper complex of the classical LPS-activated NF-B complex (Fig. 5B, lane 3), which also contains the NF-B subunit p50 (Fig. 5B, lane 4). EMSA using AhR-NF-B2 and AhR-NF-B3 oligonucleotides did not reveal any binding of RelA (Fig. 5A,  lanes 3 and 7).
Expression of AhR in Inflammatory Disease-Here, we tested whether the expression of AhR would change under the conditions of an inflammatory disease, which is associated with an increased NF-B activity. First, we investigated AhR expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients compared with PBMCs from healthy patients. PBMCs were isolated as described previously (25). Blood samples from patients with RA and control subjects were obtained by venipuncture after informed consent. The clinical diagnosis was verified using published criteria (26). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of California at Davis. We found that AhR mRNA levels were significantly elevated (ϳ2-fold) in PBMCs from RA patients compared with PBMCs from healthy patients (Fig. 6A). We next measured AhR gene expression during allergic airway inflammation in a murine model. To induce allergic airway inflammation, BALB/c mice were exposed to ovalbumin aerosol as described elsewhere (27). The level of AhR mRNA was 2.4-fold increased in the lungs of BALB/c mice after ovalbumin-induced lung inflammation compared with control mice exposed to filtered air (Fig. 6B).

DISCUSSION
The results of the current study provide new insight into the mechanism of the regulation of the human AhR gene through NF-B signaling enhancing the expression of AhR-regulated genes by inflammatory stimuli. LPS activated NF-B signaling increased the expression of AhR and CYP1A1 in vitro as well as in vivo. Results from EMSA and transfection assays indicate FIGURE 5. LPS induces nuclear protein binding to a NF-B-binding element of the AhR promoter. Nuclear extracts from untreated control (lanes 1, 5, and 9) and LPS-treated (lanes 2, 6, and 10) U937-derived DC were used for EMSA. A, EMSA was performed using double-stranded, 32 P-labeled oligonucleotides containing the AhR-NF-B1, AhR-NF-B2, or AhR-NF-B3 binding sequence of the human AhR promoter. A possible binding of RelA was identified by supershift analyses using RelA-specific antibodies (lanes 3, 7, and 11). B, EMSA was performed using double-stranded, 32 P-labeled oligonucleotides containing the AhR-NF-B1 site. The bands corresponding to the specific LPS-induced RelA and p50 NF-B subunits are indicated by arrows (lanes 3 and 4). To confirm specificity, a 100-fold excess of unlabeled AhR-NF-B oligonucleotides from the AhR promoter was added (lane 5). One representative experiment of three independently performed experiments is shown. Ab., antibody; Comp., competition; Ctrl, control; Treat., treatment.
that the NF-B-mediated increase of AhR involves elevated AhR activity. The clear increase of TCDD-induced expression of CYP1A1 by LPS in human DC as well as in thymus of B6 mice suggest that an enhanced expression of AhR during inflammation would lead to an increased sensitivity toward AhR ligands as suggested in previous reports (28 -30). The reduction in both TCDD-and LPS-enhanced expression of AhR and CYP1A1 through inhibition of NF-B indicate the importance of NF-B in regulating the expression of AhR-and AhR-dependent genes. This mechanism is strongly supported by engineered fibroblasts from RelA null mice showing a clear-cut reduction in AhR expression and a suppressed TCDD-mediated induction of CYP1A1 compared with WT MEF.
Recently, we showed that the absence of the AhR impairs the LPS-mediated induction of inflammatory marker genes and CYP1A1 (31). In contrast to the current findings in thymus, LPS reduced the basal expression of CYP1A1 in liver, which has been shown previously in mouse hepatoma cells (32). The LPSmediated decrease of CYP1A1 was enhanced and accelerated in liver of Ahr Ϫ/Ϫ mice compared with B6 WT mice (31), demonstrating that the suppression of CYP1A1 by LPS is mediated via an AhR-independent mechanism, whereas the induction of CYP1A1 by LPS depends on the presence of a functional AhR as shown in MEF and thymus of B6 WT and Ahr Ϫ/Ϫ mice. Inter-estingly, irradiation with ultraviolet B also induces the expression of CYP1A1 in human epidermal keratinocytes (33) and the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 in an AhR-dependent manner (34). Together these data show that the NF-B-mediated suppression of CYP1A1 in liver and the increased expression of CYP1A1 in DC and thymus are regulated through different mechanisms.
In the present study, we identified three putative NF-B sites on the promoter sequence of the human AhR gene. In reporter gene assays through generation of different deletion constructs and mutational analysis, we were able to show that only one NF-B binding site at Ϫ2757 bp (AhR-NF-B1) of the AhR promoter has functional activity as indicated by LPS responsiveness. To verify the functional importance of the identified NF-B site, we confirmed the binding of RelA and p50 heterodimer in supershift analysis. These findings clearly show the regulation of AhR gene expression through activation of TLR4 and binding of the NF-B RelA/p50 complex providing a new cross-talk between NF-B and AhR signaling. Both transcription factors are also involved in the regulation of cellular processes such as apoptosis and immune functions (4,35). Recent reports including own data demonstrated the interaction between the two signaling pathways affecting the regulation of inflammatory responsive genes (36,37). Particularly in cells of the innate immune system such as macrophages, DC, natural killer cells, and lymphoid tissue inducer-like cells, the interaction of both factors seem to result in significant effects on gene regulation and cellular responses (7,8,24,36). Furthermore, non-stimulated peripheral human B cells either lack or express low levels of AhR. However, activation of B cells with CpG or CD40 ligand activated the expression of AhR mRNA and protein (38), which was associated with increased sensitivity of B cells to AhR ligands. On the other hand activation of AhR by TCDD may lead to profound impairment of humoral immune responses in B cells (39). Crawford et al. (15) showed that phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-activated splenocytes exhibit a rapid and robust increase in steady state AhR expression associated with enhanced AhR binding activity and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced expression of CYP1A1, which supports results from the present study showing an NF-B-mediated stimulation of DRE-reporter activity. However, the phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-mediated increase of CYP1A1 may also dependent upon functional PKC as shown previously (40 -42).
Activation of differentiating monocytes or macrophages has been shown to be associated with increased levels of AhR (43,36). The AhR is also differentially expressed in various T-cell subsets. The expression and activation of the AhR has been recently shown to be a critical event in T-cell differentiation. For instance, the AhR is usually not expressed in naïve T-cells, Th1, or Th2 cells; however, Treg, Tr1, and especially Th17 cells express a high level of AhR (9,10,44). Because NF-B is activated downstream of the IL-17 pathway, these data support the control of AhR expression by NF-B signaling, leading to an increased expression of functional AhR in T-cells.
Th17 cells are key effector T cells in human autoimmune diseases, including RA, and recent reports suggest a critical role of AhR not only in Th17 cell development but also in the context of RA pathogenesis (45). Results of the current study indi- FIGURE 6. Elevated expression of AhR in inflammatory disease. A, AhR expression in PBMCs from healthy and RA patients. Total RNA was harvested from PBMCs from six healthy and seven RA patients matched by gender and age. B, expression of AhR in lungs of mice after ovalbumin (OVA)-induced allergic lung inflammation and airway hyperreactivity. BALB/c mice (five mice per group) were sensitized by intraperitoneal (intraperitoneal) injection of ovalbumin and alum solution for 4 weeks and then exposed to ovalbumin aerosol six times over a period of 12 days as described elsewhere (26). Agematched control animals were injected intraperitoneal with ovalbumin ϩ alum adjuvant (sensitized) and were exposed only to filtered air. Experiments were performed in triplicate for each of the samples. AhR and CYP1A1 mRNA levels were analyzed by real-time PCR. A single asterisk indicates significantly different from control (p Ͻ 0.05).
cate that AhR mRNA is modestly induced in two disease models such as RA and allergic airway inflammation, but the experiments do not necessarily define a role for NF-B in these responses. These data are in line with a report demonstrating elevated AhR levels in RA synovial tissue compared with osteoarthritis tissue (46). Interestingly, AhR antagonists have been shown to ameliorate inflammation associated with RA and the deficiency or antagonism of AhR may cause a lower inflammatory response mediated by IL-1␤ (47).
In summary, these data support the important role of the AhR in differentiating immune cells and that activation of NF-B involves RelA-dependent AhR expression and enhanced activity of AhRregulated genes. First, these findings may explain altered metabolism of xenobiotics and drugs by inflammatory stimuli and cytokines that regulate NF-B; second, the data may provide a mechanism causing activated immune cells to be more sensitive to immune modulation by AhR ligands than are resting cells.