α-Actinin 4 Potentiates Nuclear Factor κ-Light-chain-enhancer of Activated B-cell (NF-κB) Activity in Podocytes Independent of Its Cytoplasmic Actin Binding Function*

Background: ACTN4 is an actin-binding protein and is associated with kidney diseases. Results: Nuclear ACTN4 interacts with NF-κB and is recruited to NF-κB-targeted promoters to potentiate its transcription activity. Conclusion: ACTN4 coactivates NF-κB activity independently of its cytoplasmic activity in cultured human podocytes. Significance: Nuclear ACTN4 may play an important role in glomerular function. Glomerular podocytes are highly specialized terminally differentiated cells that act as a filtration barrier in the kidney. Mutations in the actin-binding protein, α-actinin 4 (ACTN4), are linked to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a chronic kidney disease characterized by proteinuria. Aberrant activation of NF-κB pathway in podocytes is implicated in glomerular diseases including proteinuria. We demonstrate here that stable knockdown of ACTN4 in podocytes significantly reduces TNFα-mediated induction of NF-κB target genes, including IL-1β and NPHS1, and activation of an NF-κB-driven reporter without interfering with p65 nuclear translocation. Overexpression of ACTN4 and an actin binding-defective variant increases the reporter activity. In contrast, an FSGS-linked ACTN4 mutant, K255E, which has increased actin binding activity and is predominantly cytoplasmic, fails to potentiate NF-κB activity. Mechanistically, IκBα blocks the association of ACTN4 and p65 in the cytosol. In response to TNFα, both NF-κB subunits p65 and p50 translocate to the nucleus, where they bind and recruit ACTN4 to their targeted promoters, IL-1β and IL-8. Taken together, our data identify ACTN4 as a novel coactivator for NF-κB transcription factors in podocytes. Importantly, this nuclear function of ACTN4 is independent of its actin binding activity in the cytoplasm.

The kidney glomerular podocytes are highly specialized epithelial cells that extend numerous lamellipodia that branch into primary and secondary processes, which further ramify into smaller processes known as foot processes (1). These foot processes are spanned by slit diaphragms containing nephrin that prevent the filtration of larger plasma proteins into the urine. The maintenance of the slit diaphragm is critical for proper glomerular filtration and kidney function.
Mutations in several genes encoding components of the slit diaphragm or the foot processes have been linked to familial forms of FSGS 2 (for review, see Refs. 2 and 3), including ␣-actinin-4 (ACTN4) (4,5). ACTN4 was originally isolated as a protein that binds F-actin to modulate cytoskeletal organization and cell motility (6), and initial theories of its function in FSGS have centered on this role, postulating that increased actin binding activity contributes to pathogenesis. However, the mechanisms by which FSGS-linked ACTN4 mutations cause glomerular diseases remain elusive.
While investigating histone deacetylase 7 (HDAC7)-interacting proteins, we identified ACTN4 as a transcriptional coactivator for MEF2 transcription factors (7). This finding was recently confirmed by An et al. (8). We also established that ACTN4 has a regulatory function on transcription mediated by nuclear hormone receptors such as estrogen receptor, retinoic acid receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, and vitamin D receptor via its N-terminal nuclear receptor-interacting motif, LXXLL (9,10). Notably, FSGS-linked ACTN4 mutants, which are predominantly cytoplasmic, lose their ability to potentiate hormone-dependent transcriptional activation (11). Based on these observations, we conclude that ACTN4 plays a role in both cytoskeletal dynamics and transcription through nuclear hormone receptor signaling.
NF-B transcription factors regulate immune responses, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation through controlling the expression of genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules (12,13). NF-B signaling comprises the canonical pathway that involves heterodimers of RelA/p65 and p105/p50 and the non-canonical pathway that includes heterodimers of RelB and p100/p52. The canonical pathways are activated by pattern recognition receptors and the tumor necrosis family receptors in response to a variety of pro-inflammatory signals including cytokines such as TNF␣. Upon stimulation, the IB kinase complex phosphorylates IB (the cytoplasmic repressor for the NF-B p50/p65 heterodimer), which promotes IB degradation and subsequent p65/p50 heterodimer release and translocation to the nucleus. Upon nuclear translocation, NF-B transcription factors bind their target genes and recruit chromatin modification enzymes and transcriptional cofactors to regulate specific target gene expression.
Several studies have linked dysregulated activation of NF-B with human chronic kidney diseases, podocyte function, and nephrin expression levels (14 -20). Because of the known interactions between the nuclear hormone glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and NF-B signaling, and also the importance of glucocorticoids in the treatment of proteinuric kidney diseases, we wished to determine whether ACTN4 participates in transcriptional responses mediated by NF-B and GR. In this study, we describe a novel role for ACTN4 as a transcriptional coactivator of NF-B in podocytes. In addition, the previously described FSGS-linked ACTN4 mutant, K255E, fails to potentiate NF-B activity (11). These transcriptional regulatory functions appear to be independent of cytoskeletal functions associated with actin binding defects of the K255E ACTN4 mutation. Taken together, our findings highlight a previously underappreciated function of ACTN4 in transcriptional activation in glomerular physiology and a novel pathological consequence of the mutations in ACTN4 associated with FSGS.
Generation of Stable Knockdown Cells-shRNAs against  human ACTN4 (TRCN0000055783, TRCN0000055784, TRC  N0000055785, TRCN0000055786, and TRCN0000055787), shRNA  against human IB␣ (TRCN0000004539, TRCN0000004540,  TRCN0000004541, and TRCN0000004542), and shRNA against human HDAC7 (TRCN0000195442) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The packaging plasmids used were pMD2.G and psPAX2, which were kindly provided by Dr. Barbara Bedogni. After cotransfection into the HEK293T packaging cell line with shRNA and packaging plasmid, the supernatants containing the lentivirus were collected and used to infect the HEK293T and HPC cell lines. Cells were stably infected with lentivirus and selected in puromycin-containing medium (1.5 g/ml) for 2 days. Knockdown of ACTN4 was confirmed by Western blots.
Subcellular Fractionation-Isolation of nuclei and cytoplasm from HPCs and extraction of nuclear and cytosolic proteins were performed according to a published protocol (11). Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and followed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies.
In Vitro Protein-Protein Interaction Assays-GST fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli DH5␣ strain, affinitypurified, and immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads. Immobilized, purified GST, GST-ACTN4, or GST-p65 fusion proteins were incubated with whole cell extracts expressing HA-p65, HA-ACTN4, or HA-p50 followed by extensive washes as described (22). The pulldown fractions were subjected to Western blotting with the HA antibodies. The immobilized GST and GST fusion proteins were visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.
Coimmunoprecipitation-HPCs were treated with vehicle or TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) and harvested, and whole cell lysates were prepared (11). Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting assays were carried out following our published protocol (9).
Transient Transfection Reporter Assays-HEK293T cells stably expressing shRNA against human ACTN4 or HDAC7 or overexpressing wild-type or mutant HA-ACTN4 were cultured in 24-well plates. Cells were cotransfected with an NF-B luciferase reporter (a generous gift from Dr. Bedogni) or MCP-1-Luc reporter and pCMX-␤-galactosidase construct using Lipofectamine 2000. The cells were lysed in reporter lysis buffer 8 h after TNF␣ or 12 h after dexamethasone treatment and 48 h after transfection (Promega). Luciferase and ␤-gal activities were measured according to the manufacturer's protocol using a luciferase assay system (Promega). Luciferase activity was normalized to ␤-gal activity. Each reaction was performed in triplicates.
RNA Isolation and qPCR-Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy isolation kit (Qiagen) and reverse-transcribed using reverse transcription kit (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR primers used in this study and their sequences were previously described. The iQ SYBR Green PCR supermix (Bio-Rad and Qiagen) and the CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) were used to quantify cDNAs according to the manufacturer's instructions. The 18 S rRNA was used for normalization. The relative mRNA expression was calculated by the 2 Ϫ(⌬⌬Ct) method. The PCR primers used in this study and their sequences were previously described (24).
ChIP Assay-ChIP assays were carried out as described with modifications (24). Chromatin was sheared by sonication, and the extracts were precleared by protein-A-coupled beads (Repligen). Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-ACTN4 and anti-p65 antibodies. The PCR primers used in this study and their sequences were previously described (24).
Immunofluorescence Microscopy-HPCs were grown on a sterile coverslip in 12-well plates, treated with or without TNF␣, fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, and incubated with anti-p65, anti-ACTN4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Flour 594 (Invitrogen). DAPI was applied to the samples after the final wash to visualize cell nuclei. Images were visualized using a Leica epifluorescence microscope.
Statistical Analysis-Data were expressed as the mean Ϯ S.D. Analyses were performed with Student's t test using GraphPad Prism6 software. A value of p Ͻ 0.05 was considered to be significant. p Ͻ 0.05 and p Ͻ 0.001 are designated by * and **, respectively.

ACTN4 Is Required for NF-B Transcriptional Activity-Our
previous work has indicated that ACTN4 plays a role in transcriptional regulation by MEF2 transcription factors and nuclear hormone receptors (7). Because of the intersection of the nuclear hormone receptors and NF-B signaling, we wished to investigate whether ACTN4 is also involved in NF-B transcriptional regulation. We established several independent HEK293T and HPC cell lines stably expressing a control shRNA (shCtrl) or ACTN4 shRNA (shACTN4) expressing different levels of endogenous ACTN4 protein. We found that knockdown of ACTN4 decreased IL-1␤ mRNA expression, a known NF-B target gene (Fig. 1A). These results indicated that ACTN4 positively regulated IL-1␤ expression in both cell lines and raised the possibility that ACTN4 played an important role in promoting NF-B signaling. To test whether ACTN4 regulates p65-mediated transcriptional activity, we examined the effect of ACTN4 knockdown on an NF-B-driven reporter activity and found that knockdown of ACTN4 significantly decreased basal and TNF␣-induced NF-B reporter activity (Fig. 1B). Consistently, overexpression of HA-ACTN4 increased TNF␣-induced were treated with TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) for 12 h, and luciferase activity was measured. A schematic representation of the reporter construct (top) and the expression of ACTN4 (bottom) are shown. C, HEK293T cells were cotransfected with an NF-B luciferase reporter plasmid and increasing amounts of HA-ACTN4 expression plasmid followed by treatment with vehicle or TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) for 12 h, and luciferase activity was measured. B and C, the relative luciferase activity was normalized to ␤-galactosidase activity (*, p Ͻ 0.05). D, the MCP-1 promoter reporter construct and CMX-␤-gal expression plasmid were transiently transfected into shCtrl or shA4-1 HEK293T cells, treated with or without TNF␣, and the reporter activity was assayed. Veh., vehicle. Error bars indicate mean Ϯ S.D.
NF-B reporter activity (Fig. 1C). We further generated a reporter construct with native MCP-1 promoter, a classical NF-B target gene, and determined the effect of ACTN4 knockdown on the promoter activity. We found that knockdown of ACTN4 significantly blocked the ability of TNF␣ to induce MCP-1 promoter activity (Fig. 1D). Taken together, these data indicate that ACTN4 is important for TNF␣-mediated transactivation activity of NF-B.
Knockdown of ACTN4 Does Not Disrupt TNF␣-induced p65 Nuclear Translocation-To dissect the mechanism underlying ACTN4-mediated transcriptional activation of NF-B target genes in HPCs, control and ACTN4 knockdown HPCs were treated with or without TNF␣ and NF-B target gene expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR. We found that knocking down ACTN4 significantly decreased mRNA levels of NF-B target genes, IL-1␤, IL8, and MCP-1 ( Fig. 2A). The nephrin gene NPHS1 has been shown to be an NF-B target gene (25). Indeed, NPHS1 mRNA expression was induced by TNF␣, and knockdown of ACTN4 abolished TNF␣-mediated induction of NPHS1 mRNA. Nuclear translocation of the NF-B family of transcription factors is an essential step to regulate the expression of their target genes. A previous study has suggested that overexpression of ACTN4 promoted nuclear translocation of p65 (26). To further dissect the mechanism by which loss of ACTN4 decreased NF-B reporter activity and its target gene expression, we determined whether knockdown of ACTN4 affects TNF␣-induced nuclear translocation of p65. Control and ACTN4 knockdown HPCs were treated with or without TNF␣ followed by subcellular fractionation and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. Subcellular fractionation of HPCs indicated that knockdown of ACTN4 had little or no effect on TNF␣-induced nuclear translocation of p65 (Fig. 2B). Immunofluorescence microscopy further demonstrated that p65 was capable of translocating to the nucleus in ACTN4 knockdown HPCs (Fig. 2C). Taken together, our data demonstrated that knockdown of ACTN4 significantly inhibited the expression of basal and TNF␣-induced NF-B target genes, but had little or no effect on TNF␣-induced nuclear translocation of p65. HPCs were starved overnight and treated with TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) for 6 h prior to harvest. Total RNA was extracted and quantitative RT-PCR analysis was conducted using gene-specific primers as indicated. Error bars indicate mean Ϯ S.D. B and C, subcellular localization of p65 in ACTN4 knockdown HPCs was analyzed by Western blotting analyses (B) or immunofluorescence microscopy (C). B, control and ACTN4 knockdown HPCs were treated with 20 ng/ml TNF␣ for 1 h and harvested, and subcellular fractions were prepared followed by Western blotting using anti-ACTN4, anti-p65, and anti-lamin B or anti-␣-tubulin as loading controls. The ratio of p65 to lamin B or ␣-tubulin at dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated HPCs was set at 1. The relative p65 intensity is shown. The quantitation data were an average of two Western blots. C, control and ACTN4 knockdown HPCs were treated with TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) for 30 min followed by immunostaining with ACTN4 and p65 antibodies and fluorescence microscopy.

Glucocorticoid-mediated Transrepression in Podocytes-
Liganded GRs can have diverse effects on both glucocorticoid response element-mediated and NF-B-mediated transcriptional activation, depending on the nature of the ligands. For example, the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex) activates glucocorticoid response element-containing reporter activity while repressing NF-B reporter activity. Fig. 3A shows that Dex treatment markedly repressed basal and TNF␣-mediated induction of IL-1␤, IL-8, and MCP-1 mRNAs. We also observed Dex-mediated transrepression of NF-B activity using a reporter that contains native promoter derived from MCP-1 in HPCs (Fig. 3B) Using HPCs in which ACTN4 was stably knocked down, we further demonstrated that Dex effectively repressed IL-1␤ and MCP-1 gene expression in ACTN4 knockdown HPCs, but had no effect on IL-8 mRNA expression (Fig.  3C). Taken together, these data indicated that Dex represses NF-B transcription activity in HPCs and that ACTN4 plays a role in Dex-mediated transrepression of NF-B activity in a gene-specific manner.
ACTN4 Physically Interacts with p65 in HPCs-We further dissected the mechanism by which ACTN4 potentiates NF-B transcription activity by examining whether ACTN4 and p65 interact. First, we demonstrated that endogenous ACTN4 was coprecipitated with exogenously expressed HA-p65 in HEK293T cells (Fig. 4A). We further confirmed that this inter-action occurs for endogenous ACTN4 and p65 (Fig. 4B). In the absence of TNF␣, ACTN4 is distributed throughout the cells, whereas p65 is primarily in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). In response to TNF␣, a significant fraction of p65 translocates into the nucleus, whereas subcellular localization of ACTN4 remains relatively unchanged. These observations raise an intriguing question. Do ACTN4 and p65 interact in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus? Indeed, we observed that ACTN4 and p65 coimmunoprecipitated in the nuclear extracts prepared from TNF␣-treated HEK293T cells (Fig. 4C). Similarly, we observed that p65 only interacts nuclear, but not cytoplasmic ACTN4 in TNF␣-treated HPCs (Fig. 4D). Lastly, we isolated glomeruli from mice and prepared total cellular extracts. Immunoprecipitation with anti-p65 antibodies indicated that ACTN4 and p65 interact in mouse glomeruli (Fig. 4E). To further confirm this association, we examined whether endogenous ACTN4 interacts with exogenously transfected HA-p65. In summary, these data indicate that p65 and ACTN4 interact in glomeruli, HPCs, and HEK293T cells.
The Role of Cytoplasmic IB␣ in ACTN4-p65 Interaction-Because cytoplasmic NF-B is bound by IB, the inability of ACTN4 to bind NF-B in the cytoplasm could be due to the masking of the ACTN4-interacting surface in p65 by cytoplasmic IB␣. Alternatively, it is possible that nuclear and cytoplasmic p65 and p50 have distinct biochemical properties such as HPCs were starved overnight and then treated with Dex (100 ng/ml) or TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) for 6 h. Total RNA was extracted and quantitative RT-PCR analysis was conducted using gene-specific primers as indicated. Veh., vehicle. B, Dex-mediated transrepression of TNF␣ activity in a reporter construct that contains native MCP-1 promoter. The MCP-1 promoter reporter construct was transiently transfected into HPCs and treated with vehicle, TNF␣, Dex, or both TNF␣ and Dex, and the reporter activity was assayed. C, the expression of NF-B target genes in control and ACTN4 knockdown HPCs treated with vehicle or Dex. Control and ACTN4 stable knockdown HPCs were treated with Dex (100 ng/ml) for 4 h. Total RNA was extracted and RT-qPCR analysis was conducted using genespecific primers as indicated. Error bars indicate mean Ϯ S.D.

FIGURE 4. ACTN4 and p65 interact in glomeruli and in mammalian kidney cells.
A, exogenous p65 and endogenous ACTN4 interact in TNF␣-treated HEK293T cells. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with a control or a HA-p65 expression plasmid and treated with TNF␣, and immunoprecipitation (IP) was performed with anti-HA antibodies followed by immunoblotting with anti-HA and anti-ACTN4 antibodies. B, HEK293T cells were treated with or without TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) for 1 h, and whole cell extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-p65 antibodies and anti-HA antibodies as control. Proteins were detected by Western blotting (IB) using anti-ACTN4 and anti-p65 antibodies as indicated. The asterisks show nonspecific background signals. C, HEK293T cells were treated with TNF␣ (20 ng/ml) for 1 h, and nuclear extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-HA (control), anti-p65, or anti-ACTN4 antibodies. The immunopellets were subjected to Western blotting with anti-p65 and anti-ACTN4 antibodies. D, nuclear ACTN4 and p65 interact in HPCs. HPCs were treated with TNF␣, and nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were prepared. Coimmunoprecipitation was carried out using anti-p65 antibodies followed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. E, mouse glomerular extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-p65 antibodies or anti-HA antibodies followed by Western blotting with anti-ACTN4 and p65 antibodies. The asterisks E represent nonspecific background signals. S.E., short exposure; L.E., longer exposure. FIGURE 5. IB␣ blocks ACTN4 from interacting with p65 in the cytosol. A, purified, immobilized GST-p65 was incubated with cell extracts expressing HA-ACTN4 or HA-p50. Pulldown fractions were subject to Western blotting with anti-HA antibodies. B, purified, immobilized GST-ACTN4 was incubated with cell extracts expressing HA-p65 (full-length), HA-p65 (1-313), or HA-p65 (314 -551) followed by Western blotting with anti-HA antibodies. C, knockdown of IB␣ results in an association between ACTN4 and p65. HPCs were transiently transfected with a control or IB␣ shRNA, and nuclear (N) and cytoplasmic (C) fractions were prepared, immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-p65 antibodies, and Western blotted with the indicated antibodies. differential posttranslational modification. p65 and p50 are subjected to intensive posttranslational modification such as phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, glycosylation, and ubiquitination (27). To distinguish these two possibilities, we first tested whether bacterially expressed GST-p65 is capable of pulling down HA-ACTN4 expressed in mammalian cells. Indeed, GST-p65 was capable of pulling down HA-ACTN4, suggesting that posttranslational modification of p65 is not required for interacting with ACTN4 (Fig. 5A). We further mapped ACTN4 interaction domain in p65 to the first 313 amino acids (Fig. 5B), the same region where IB␣ binds. Lastly, we demonstrated that depletion of IB␣ in HPCs significantly enhances the interaction between ACTN4 and p65 in the cytoplasm. In summary, these data support a model in which cytoplasmic IB␣ masks the ACTN4 interaction domain, thus blocking ACTN4 from binding p65.
Association of ACTN4 (WT) and Its Variant with NF-B Subunits-We have previously described a spliced variant of ACTN4 (Fig. 6A), ACTN4 (Iso), which binds and potentiates transcriptional activity by nuclear receptors (9, 10) and MEF2C (7). We also demonstrated that the LXXLL nuclear interacting motif is essential for nuclear receptor binding and transcriptional activation (9,11). We next addressed whether p65 binds ACTN4 variants by GST pulldown assays and whether the LXXLL motif is critical for the interaction between ACTN4 and p65. We found that mutation of the LXXLL motif, LXXAA (AA), had little effect on p65 binding activity (Fig. 6B, lanes 3  and 4) and that GST-ACTN4 (Iso) also binds p65, but less robustly than the full-length protein (lanes 3 and 5). We have previously shown that the FSGS-linked ACTN4 mutant, K255E, is defective in interacting with nuclear receptors (11). However, ACTN4 (K255E) interacts with p65 similarly to the wild-type protein. Interestingly, the p65 heterodimeric partner, p50, also binds ACTN4 and its variants (Fig. 6C), although p50 binds ACTN4 (Iso) better than the full-length protein (lanes 3 and 5). Furthermore, ACTN4 (K255E) exhibited a weaker binding to p50. We further determined the ability of these ACTN4 variants to potentiate NF-B reporter activity (Fig. 6D). We observed a higher reporter activity in ACTN4 (Iso) and ACTN4 (Iso, AA) transfected cells, although their expression levels were significantly lower than the full-length ACTN4 (Fig. 6D,  right panel). In contrast, the FSGS-linked mutant, K255E, significantly lost its ability to activate NF-B reporter activity. Taken together, these data indicate that the p65 and p50 binding surfaces in ACTN4 do not overlap with those of nuclear receptors and that ACTN4 (Iso) possess intrinsically more potent coactivation activity.
The HDAC7-interacting Domain Is Important for ACTN4mediated Transcriptional Activation-We have previously demonstrated that the ability of ACTN4 to potentiate MEF2and estrogen receptor ␣ (ER␣)-mediated transactivation requires its HDAC7-interacting domain (7,9). We therefore determined whether HDAC7 plays a role in ACTN4-mediated potentiation of NF-B activity. Indeed, the ACTN4 mutants defective in interacting with HDAC7 significantly lost their ability to potentiate NF-B-driven reporter activity (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, knockdown of HDAC7 potentiates NF-Bdriven reporter activity (Fig. 7B) and endogenous IL-1␤ mRNA expression (Fig. 7C). Based on these data, we conclude that HDAC7 plays a role in ACTN4-mediated potentiation of NF-B transactivation activity.
We next performed ChIP assays to determine whether ACTN4 is recruited to the promoters of NF-B-targeted promoters. Indeed, TNF␣ increased the recruitment of p65 and ACTN4 to IL-1␤ (Fig. 8C) and IL-8 promoters (Fig. 8D). As a control, knockdown of ACTN4 markedly reduced the association of ACTN4 with the IL-1␤ promoter regardless of the presence of TNF␣ (Fig. 8E). Interestingly, knockdown of ACTN4 slightly reduced the binding of p65 to the IL-1␤ promoter. Taken together, we conclude that ACTN4 and p65 are recruited to IL-1␤ and IL-8 promoters in response to TNF␣ in HPCs.  ⌬ 441-479) and an NF-B reporter and treated with or without TNF␣, and reporter activity was measured. Veh., vehicle. B, HEK293T cells were infected with a shCtrl or shHDAC7 expression viral vector and an NF-B reporter and treated with or without TNF␣, and reporter activity was determined. C, HPCs were transiently infected with a shCtrl or shHDAC7 expression viral vector and treated with or without TNF␣, total RNA was isolated, and RT-qPCR was performed with gene-specific primers. Error bars indicate mean Ϯ S.D.

DISCUSSION
We and others have previously demonstrated that in addition to its role in the cytoplasm, ACTN4 is capable of potentiating the activity of several transcription factors that include nuclear receptors such as the estrogen receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, retinoic acid receptor, vitamin D receptor (9 -11), and MEF2s (7,8). These observations raise a mechanistically important question regarding the role of ACTN4 in podocyte function and kidney disease. Is the known cytoplasmic actin binding activity of ACTN4 required for its ability to coactivate transcription factors?
We previously reported that ACTN4 is recruited to the promoter of estrogen receptor target gene, pS2 (9). When tethered to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (DBD), Gal DBD-ACTN4 potently activates Gal4 reporter activity, likely through its interaction with transcriptional coactivators such as p160 coactivators and the histone acetyltransferase activity p300/ CBP-associated factor (PCAF) (10). Our current study provides strong evidence demonstrating that 1) ACTN4 is essential for NF-B-mediated transcriptional activation, 2) ACTN4 interacts with p65 and p50 in the nucleus and is recruited to the promoters of NF-B target genes, IL-1␤ and IL-8, 3) loss of FIGURE 8. Association of p65 and ACTN4 with IL1-␤ and IL-8 promoters in HPCs. A, HeLa cells were transiently transfected with an HA-p65 expression plasmid. Nuclear (N) and cytoplasmic (C) lysates were incubated with immobilized GST or GST-ACTN4 (WT) (lanes 1-6). Lanes 7-12, pulldown assays were performed with nuclear extracts expressing HA-P65 and immobilized GST, GST-ACTN4, and its variants. Pulldown fractions were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA antibodies. The expressions of GST fusion proteins were visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. The asterisk shows contaminated bacterial proteins copurified with GST proteins. B, the experiments were similar to that in A except that HA-p50-expressed HeLa nuclear extracts were used for pulldown assays. C-E, HPCs were treated with vehicle or TNF␣ for 1 h followed by ChIP assays with anti-p65 and anti-ACTN4 antibodies. Immunoprecipitated chromatin was analyzed by qPCR using the primers flanking p65-binding sites on IL-1␤ (C) and IL-8 (D) promoters. TNF␣-induced association of p65 and ACTN4 with the promoters is shown as relative promoter occupancy. E, HPCs stably expressing shCtrl or shACTN4 were used for ChIP assays as described in C and D. The relative recruitment of ACTN4 to the IL-1␤ promoter was determined by normalizing the PCR products from shACTN4 cells to that of the shCtrl cells. Error bars indicate mean Ϯ S.D.

ACTN4 Is a Transcriptional Coactivator of NF-B
ACTN4 does not affect TNF␣-induced nuclear translocation of p65, and 4) the spliced variant, ACTN4 (Iso), does not contain an intact actin-binding domain and is a much more potent transcriptional coactivator than the full-length ACTN4. Moreover, although the FSGS-linked mutant K255E is capable of interacting with p65, it significantly lost its ability to potentiate NF-B reporter activity. We reason that because K255E is predominantly cytoplasmic (11), it is therefore unable to potentiate the activity of transcription factors in the nucleus. This is consistent with recent studies indicating that in response to myoblast differentiation signal, ACTN4 translocates into the nucleus and coactivates MEF2 transcription activity and myogenic gene expression (8). In contrast to hormone-dependent interaction between ACTN4 and nuclear receptors, this finding provides an alternative mechanism by which ACTN4 potentiates transcriptional activity. A previous study has suggested a role of ACTN4 in activating NF-B activity (28). However, it was concluded that ACTN4 and NF-B interact in the cytoplasm, and it is unclear how cytoplasmic ACTN4 potentiates NF-B activity. However, the current study and previous reports support the notion that although ACTN4 is found in the nucleus and cytoplasm, nuclear ACTN4 binds and potentiates transcription factor activity in the nucleus, independently of its cytoplasmic actin binding activity (9 -11).
We noted that although ACTN4 (Iso) binds p65 similarly to the wild-type protein, ACTN4 (Iso) has a more potent transactivation activity than the wild-type protein (Fig. 6D). This is consistent with our previous report that Gal-ACTN4 (Iso) has a higher transactivation activity than the wild-type protein, likely due to a better binding activity of ACTN4 (Iso) to p160 coactivators and the histone acetyltransferase activity PCAF than the ACTN4 (FL) (10).
Several lines of evidence suggest that cytoplasmic IB␣ masks and prevents ACTN4 from binding p65. 1) GST-ACTN4 pulls down nuclear, but not cytoplasmic p65 or p50, 2) endogenous ACTN4 only associated with p65 when IB␣ was knocked down, and 3) the interaction domain between ACTN4 and p65 overlapped the interaction domain between IB␣ and p65. In sum, these data indicate that a compartment-dependent interaction between ACTN4 and p65 regulated by signal-dependent nuclear translocation of p65 and p50 is indispensable for the activation of NF-B activity (Fig. 9).
Glucocorticoid receptor is a member of the nuclear receptor family that regulates target gene expression through one of several mechanisms that involve activation, repression, and transrepression (29). Glucocorticoid-mediated transrepression of NF-B activity is a critical mechanism underlying its anti-inflammatory activity (29). In proteinuric kidney diseases, the glucocorticoids are a longstanding treatment strategy, although their exact mechanism of action is not fully understood. Although anti-inflammatory effects are likely involved, in vitro studies have suggested a direct beneficial effect on podocyte function (30) including stabilizing podocyte actin filaments (31). Our data indicated that ACTN4 may play a role in Dexmediated transrepression of NF-B activity in a gene-specific manner. Further investigation is necessary to dissect the mechanism by which ACTN4 regulates GR-mediated transrepression of NF-B target genes.
As an actin-binding protein that coordinates cytoskeletal dynamics of the foot processes in podocytes, ACTN4 mutations that alter its actin binding activity are likely disrupting slit diaphragm and causing podocyte injury. However, although some FSGS-associated ACTN4 mutants acquire increased actin binding activity, other FSGS-associated ACTN4 mutants bind actin similarly to the wild-type protein (32). Importantly, the FSGS-linked ACTN4 mutant, K255E, not only acquires increased actin binding activity, but also exhibits predominantly cytoplasmic distribution (11) and accelerated turnover rate (33). Furthermore, FSGS-linked ACTN4 mutants are defective in ligand-dependent interaction with nuclear receptors and decrease ligand-dependent activation of nuclear reporter activity (11). In this study, we found that although FIGURE 9. A model in which ACTN4 binds and coactivates NF-B transactivation activity in the nucleus. We propose that in the absence of TNF␣, NF-B transcription factor is sequestered by IB␣ in the cytosol, thereby blocking ACTN4 from binding to NF-B (left panel). However, knockdown of IB␣ induces the association between ACTN4 and NF-B in the cytosol (center panel). In response to TNF␣, NF-B translocates into the nucleus, where it binds and recruits ACTN4 to its targeted promoters (right panel). RHD, Rel homology domain.
K255E binds NF-B in vitro, it fails to potentiate NF-B reporter activity, likely due to nuclear exclusion of this mutant. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that ACTN4 (K255E) is both gain-of-function in acquiring increased actin binding activity and loss-of-function in losing nuclear localization, reducing protein abundance, and therefore is defective in transcriptional coactivation. Interestingly, ACTN4 deficiency is also found in multiple human primary glomerulopathies including sporadic FSGS, minimal change disease, and IgA nephropathy (34 -37). Recent studies further indicated that the abundance of ACTN4 protein is significantly reduced in experimental glomerular diseases (38,39). Indeed, Actn4 knock-out mice do not survive the perinatal period, and the remaining mice that survive exhibit severe glomerular defects, podocyte injury, and proteinuria (40). Collectively, these observations suggest that expression levels of normal, not just mutant ACTN4, play an important role in many forms of glomerular diseases independent of a genetic alteration in F-actin binding.
Perturbed activation of NF-B is implicated in various nephrotic diseases. Constitutive activation of NF-B is associated with FSGS in HIV-associated nephropathy as well as passive Heymann nephritis and contributes to proteinuria (41). However, inhibition of NF-B is thought to contribute to TGF␤-mediated apoptosis of murine podocytes (42), and down-regulation of NF-B is found in podocytes in c-MIP elevated idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (43). A better elucidation of the role of NF-B, its target genes, and regulation in podocytes will help understand the pathogenesis of podocytopathies. Our finding that ACTN4 is essential for NF-B-mediated transcriptional activation opens a new avenue for future study involving anti-inflammatory treatment effects and podocyte function in FSGS.