Structure-Function Analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster Caudal Transcription Factor Provides Insights into Core Promoter-preferential Activation *

Background: Caudal is a core promoter-preferential transcription factor. Results: We defined functional regions in Caudal that are important for core promoter-preferential activation and demonstrated that dCBP confers core promoter-preferential activation. Conclusion: The unique combination of Caudal and dCBP enables co-activation in a core promoter-preferential manner. Significance: We provide mechanistic insights into core promoter-enhancer compatibility.

Embryonic development is highly dependent on transcriptional regulation (for reviews, see Refs. [1][2][3][4][5]. The accurate expression of developmental control genes involves nucleosome remodeling, histone modifications, and the binding of transcriptional activators and co-activators to enhancers and promoters (for reviews, see Refs. 2, 6 -9). The precise recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) 3 to the transcription start site (TSS) plays a central role in regulating gene expression (10 -18). Transcription initiation in eukaryotes requires the assembly of basal transcription factors and RNA polymerase II at the core promoter region to form the preinitiation complex (for reviews, see Refs. 19 -21). The core promoter is defined as the region from Ϫ40 to ϩ40 relative to the TSS that is required for accurate initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II (10 -18). Core promoters are highly diverse in structure and function. The core promoter may contain one or more short DNA sequences, termed core promoter elements or motifs, such as the TATA box (22), initiator (Inr) (23), TCT (24), motif 10 element (25,26), and downstream core promoter element (DPE) (27)(28)(29), which contribute to its function. There are no universal core promoter elements. The TATA box, the first eukaryotic core promoter element identified (22), is conserved from Archaea to humans (30). The upstream T is typically located at Ϫ31 or Ϫ30 relative to the TSS (31,32). It is bound by the TATA-binding protein subunit of the TFIID complex, which is the first basal transcription factor that binds the promoter in the hierarchical recruitment of RNA Pol II (21,33). * This work was supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant 798/10 (to The Inr encompasses the TSS and is considered the most common core promoter element (34 -36). The Inr serves as recognition site for the TAF1 and TAF2 subunits of TFIID (37). The DPE was originally identified as a TFIID recognition site that is downstream of the Inr (precisely located at ϩ28 to ϩ33 relative to the Aϩ1 of the Inr) and is conserved from Drosophila to humans (27)(28)(29). DPE-dependent transcription is highly dependent on the Inr element (27)(28)(29).
The majority of the Drosophila Hox genes, which lack TATA box elements, contain functional DPE motifs (38). Moreover, Drosophila Caudal, a sequence-specific homeodomain transcription factor and key regulator of the Hox genes, has been demonstrated to activate its target promoters with a preference for a DPE motif (38). The Drosophila caudal gene encodes a homeodomain transcription factor expressed in a gradient-like manner at the posterior of the embryo (39 -43). Mutations in caudal that reduce or eliminate the gradient cause abnormal zygotic expression of several segmentation genes and alter the global body pattern (41). In addition, ectopic expression of caudal in Drosophila disrupts head development and segmentation (44) probably due to the fact that Caudal is a direct activator of the pair rule segmentation gene fushi tarazu (ftz) (45). The Caudal protein activates ftz transcription in the posterior half of the embryo by interacting with multiple copies of TTTATG consensus sequence located upstream of the TSS (45).
caudal-like genes are highly conserved in evolution and have been found in multiple species (41, 46 -57). The vertebrate Caudal-related homeobox (Cdx) proteins have been identified as factors that mediate anterior-posterior patterning through Hox gene regulation (46,50,52,53,55,56). Moreover, recent studies suggest that Cdx family members are involved in the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells (58 -61).
Here, we show that the ability to activate ftz transcription with a preference for a DPE motif is conserved between Drosophila Caudal and mouse Caudal-related Cdx proteins. The mouse Cdx (mCdx) proteins are the first identified vertebrate transcription factors that have the ability to preferentially activate DPE-dependent promoters. To understand the mechanism of core promoter-preferential activation by Caudal, we performed a structure-function analysis. Our results suggest that the C terminus of Caudal and the N termini of mCdx1 and mCdx2 are important for core promoter-preferential activation. Moreover, we discovered that Drosophila cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein (dCBP) is a co-activator for Caudal-regulated activation of ftz and have mapped the region necessary for the co-activation to the N terminus of dCBP. Taken together, our analysis indicates that dCBP is involved in Caudal-mediated enhancer-promoter specificity and provides mechanistic insights into core promoter-preferential activation by Caudal.

Experimental Procedures
Plasmid Construction-GAL4-VP16 and GAL4-stop were each subcloned into the pAc5.1 expression vector by PCR using the GAL4-VP16 pJL2 plasmid as a template.
GAL4-responsive firefly luciferase reporter plasmids were constructed by cloning five GAL4 DNA-binding sites upstream of the minimal ftz promoter (from Ϫ40 to ϩ40 relative to the TSS) that drives the expression of the firefly luciferase reporter gene. The ftz minimal promoter is either DPE-dependent (containing a mutated TATA box (mTATA)) or TATA-dependent (containing a mutated DPE (mDPE)). The distance between the downstream-most GAL4 DNA-binding site and the Ϫ40 position of the ftz minimal promoter is 21 bp.
Transfections and Reporter Gene Assays-Drosophila Schneider S2Rϩ adherent cells were cultured in Schneider's Drosophila medium (Biological Industries) that was supple-mented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. Cells were transfected in 24-well plates by using the Escort IV reagent (Sigma). For Dual-Luciferase assays, cells were plated at 0.6 ϫ 10 6 cells/well of a 24-well plate 1 day prior to transfection. Each well was transfected with a total of 930 ng of a single expression vector or a vector control as indicated, 60 ng of firefly luciferase reporter constructs, and 10 ng of Pol III-Renilla luciferase reporter (kindly provided by Dr. Norbert Perrimon, Harvard Medical School). Co-activation experiments were performed by transfection of 465 ng of each expression vector (Caudal, dCBP, or vector control) using a total of 930 ng of expression vectors. Medium was replaced the next morning, and cells were harvested 36 -48 h post-transfection and assayed for Dual-Luciferase activities as specified by the manufacturer (Promega). To correct for variations in transfection efficiency, the firefly luciferase activity of each sample was normalized to the corresponding Renilla luciferase activity. Each transfection was performed in triplicate. Each graph represents an average of at least three independent experiments (as indicated in each figure legend).
Statistical Analyses-Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. The analyses of the differences between the activity of an mDPE reporter and an mTATA reporter for a specific activator were performed using Student's t test. The comparison between different activators was done using two-way analysis of variance.

Results
The Caudal Vertebrate Homologues Mouse Cdx1, Cdx2, and Cdx4 Are Core Promoter-preferential Activators-Drosophila Caudal is the first core promoter-specific activator discovered that preferentially activates DPE-specific transcription (38). To gain further insight into Caudal function, we decided to check whether the core promoter-preferential activation is conserved in the vertebrate homologs of Drosophila Caudal, the Cdx family members. There are three Caudal-related Cdx family members, Cdx1, Cdx2, and Cdx4, that possess both unique and common properties (46, 50, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58 -61, 63-69). We compared the ability of the Cdx family members to preferentially activate transcription from the ftz enhancer and promoter, which naturally contains functional Inr, TATA box, and DPE core promoter elements and has been shown to be regulated by Drosophila Caudal in a core promoter-preferential manner (38). To that end, we used firefly luciferase reporter genes driven by either wild-type (WT), a DPE-dependent (containing mTATA), a TATA-dependent (containing mDPE), or a double mutant (mTATA ϩ mDPE) version of the ftz transcriptional control region from Ϫ988 to ϩ40 relative to the RNA start site (38), which includes the previously characterized Caudal-binding sites (45). As Drosophila melanogaster Schneider cells (S2Rϩ) do not express endogenous caudal (FlyBase), they are ideally suited for this study. Drosophila S2Rϩ cells were co-transfected with firefly luciferase reporters driven by a ftz genomic fragment containing either WT, mTATA, mDPE, or mTATA ϩ mDPE (depicted in Fig. 1A) as well as with a Pol III-Renilla luciferase reporter vector (to normalize for variations in transfection efficiency) and vectors driving the expression of either Drosophila Caudal, mCdx1, mCdx2, or mCdx4. Cell extracts were assayed for Dual-Luciferase activity. The normalized firefly to Renilla luciferase activities are presented in Fig. 1B, and the -fold activation by Caudal, Cdx1, Cdx2, and Cdx4 relative to the activities of the promoters in the absence of a co-transfected Caudal or Cdx expression plasmid (which were defined to be 1) are presented in Fig. 1C.
Consistent with previous observations (38), the wild-type ftz promoter exhibited a much higher basal transcriptional activity in the absence of transfected Caudal or Cdx expression vectors as compared with the mutant versions of the ftz promoter, indicating the dependence of the ftz promoter activity on both the TATA box and the DPE (Fig. 1B). Notably, mutation of both the TATA box and the DPE nearly abolished transcriptional activity. Remarkably, similarly to Drosophila Caudal, mCdx2 preferentially activated the DPE-dependent ftz reporter (Fig. 1C). It is of note that although the absolute levels of transcriptional activation of the WT reporter by Caudal were higher than the activation by Caudal of the mutated reporters (Fig. 1B) the -fold activation of the WT reporter by Caudal relative to the vector control was lower than that of the mTATA reporter (Fig. 1C). This likely results from the fact that the basal activity of the WT reporter is much higher than the basal activities of the mutant reporters, and the activation of the WT reporter by Caudal might have reached a maximum due to limiting factors in the cells.
Interestingly, co-transfection of mCdx1 preferentially activated the transcription of the DPE-dependent ftz reporter as compared with the TATA-dependent ftz reporter, albeit to overall lower levels than activation by either Drosophila Caudal or mCdx2 (Fig. 1C). Notably, mCdx4, which differs from mCdx1 and mCdx2 (67,70,71), activated ftz transcription with core promoter specificity; however, the -fold difference between the activation of the two reporters by mCdx4 was not as pronounced as that observed with mCdx1 or mCdx2 (Fig. 1C). Hence, core promoter-preferential activation of transcription is a conserved characteristic of Caudal and its related family members, mouse Cdx1, Cdx2, and Cdx4, which are shown here to be DPE-specific preferential activators.
The C-terminal Region of Caudal Contributes to Core Promoter-preferential Activation of ftz-Caudal is an HD transcription factor. Using multiple motif/domain search bioinformatics tools, we did not find additional putative domains in the primary sequence of Caudal. To identify domains within the Drosophila Caudal protein that are important for preferential activation of DPE transcription, we constructed a series of FLAG-tagged Caudal deletion mutants in which multiple regions of the N-terminal and C-terminal ends were deleted but the DNA-binding HD was preserved ( Fig. 2A). The regions we chose to delete had varying degrees of sequence conservation as compared with the vertebrate Cdx proteins. The expression vector for each deletion mutant was co-transfected into S2Rϩ cells with either ftz mTATA or ftz mDPE firefly luciferase reporter vectors as described previously.
Deletion of aa 2-268 did not significantly reduce the activation of the ftz mTATA or ftz mDPE firefly luciferase reporters as compared with the full-length Caudal (Fig. 2B). Surprisingly, an internal deletion of aa 36 -243 (which are included in the N-terminal deletion of 2-268) led to a significant reduction in the ftz mTATA reporter activity as compared with that of full-length Caudal. Western blot analysis using anti-FLAG antibodies indicated that the observed reduced activity was not a result of reduced protein levels (Fig. 2C). It is likely that a conformational change induced by this deletion prevented this construct from being as transcriptionally active as the other N-terminal deletion construct. In contrast, transcriptional activation of the ftz mTATA reporter was not significantly affected by co-transfection of the aa 95-135 deletion construct (Fig. 2B). Hence, the N terminus of Caudal may be dispensable for the core promoter-preferential activation of ftz by Caudal.
Interestingly, reduced ftz mTATA reporter activity was observed upon co-transfection of a Caudal expression construct in which aa 363-427 were deleted, whereas deletion of aa 399 -420 did not significantly reduce the preferential activation (Fig. 2D). Taken together, the results suggest that the C-terminal region of Caudal contributes to the DPE-preferential activation of ftz by Caudal.

The Region Containing Both the Homeodomain and the C Terminus of Caudal Is Sufficient to Confer Core Promoter-preferential Activation to a Heterologous DNA-binding Domain-
To examine which region of Caudal is sufficient to confer core promoter-preferential activation to a heterologous DNA-binding domain, we utilized the GAL4 luciferase-based assay in which the GAL4-DBD was either fused to the N terminus and the HD of Caudal (aa 2-334), the HD and the C terminus of Caudal (aa 270 -427), the C-terminal region whose deletion resulted in reduced preferential activation (aa 363-427; Fig.  2D), or the HD of Caudal (aa 270 -334) (Fig. 3). Full-length Caudal as well as the VP16 transcriptional activation domain were fused to GAL4 as positive controls. The GAL4 followed by a stop codon and the full-length Caudal that was not fused to GAL4-DBD were used as negative controls. Each GAL4 fusion was subcloned into the pAc5.1 expression vector. The reporter activities of S2Rϩ cells that were co-transfected with a firefly , or Cdx4 expression vectors as well as firefly luciferase reporter constructs driven by the ftz enhancer-promoter containing either the WT sequence, mTATA, mDPE, or mTATA ϩ mDPE. A, schematic representation of the natural ftz transcriptional control region. The ftz core promoter contains both DPE and TATA box motifs. The reporter constructs contain ftz enhancer and promoter sequences from Ϫ988 to ϩ40 relative to the ϩ1 start site and are identical except for having a WT sequence, mTATA, mDPE, or mTATA ϩ mDPE as depicted. To normalize for variations in transfection efficiency, cells were co-transfected with a Pol III-Renilla luciferase control plasmid and assayed for Dual-Luciferase activity. B, normalized firefly to Renilla luciferase activities. C, the luciferase activities depicted in B are reported relative to the activities of the promoters in the absence of a co-transfected Caudal or Cdx expression plasmid, which were defined to be 1. The graph represents an average of three independent experiments. Error bars represent S.E. **, 0.001 Յ p Յ 0.01; ***, p Յ 0.001.
luciferase reporter driven by five GAL4-binding sites upstream of ftz minimal promoter (containing either the mTATA or mDPE) (Fig. 3A) as well as with the various GAL4-Caudal expression plasmids (Fig. 3B) were analyzed using Dual-Luciferase assays (Fig. 3C).
As shown in Fig. 3C, the GAL4-DBD fused to the full-length Caudal activates the GAL4-ftz reporters in a core promoterpreferential manner. As expected, the transcriptional activation by the GAL4-VP16 fusion protein was very high compared with the other constructs. Neither the GAL4-stop expression vector nor the pAc5.1 vector control activated the GAL4-ftz reporters. Low transcription levels were observed by co-trans-fection of Caudal that was not fused to the GAL4-DBD. Nevertheless, the activity observed by this construct was significantly lower than the activity observed for the GAL4-fused full-length Caudal. It is of note that we have previously compared the activity of the untagged Caudal with FLAG-tagged Caudal and observed no differences. The GAL4-DBD fusion protein containing the N-terminal and the HD regions of Caudal showed moderate transcriptional activity; albeit no preference for a particular core promoter motif was observed. Interestingly, the GAL4 fusion of the region containing the HD and the C terminus of Caudal showed marked preferential activity, whereas the C terminus of Caudal alone did not confer preferential activation to the GAL4 fusion protein. The   JULY 10, 2015 • VOLUME 290 • NUMBER 28 HD of Caudal displayed preferential activation, but the overall transcription levels were very low, very similar to the vector control or the GAL4-stop vector. Hence, although the C terminus is important for DPE preferential activation, only in the presence of the HD can it confer preferential transcriptional activation to the heterologous GAL4-DBD.

Structure-Function Analysis of Caudal
The Regions Containing Both the Homeodomains and the N Termini of Vertebrate Cdx1 and Cdx2 Are Sufficient to Confer Core Promoter-preferential Activation to a Heterologous DNAbinding Domain-To examine which region of each of the Cdx proteins is sufficient to confer the DPE-preferential activation of ftz, we generated nine GAL4-DBD-Cdx fusion constructs. The Cdx1-GAL4 constructs include the full length (aa 2-268), the N terminus and the HD (aa 2-215), and the HD and C terminus (aa 151-268) of the Cdx1 protein. The Cdx2-GAL4 constructs include the full length (aa 2-311), the N terminus and the HD (aa 2-246), and the HD and C terminus (aa 182-311) of the Cdx2 protein. The GAL4-Cdx4 constructs include the full length (aa 2-282), the N terminus and the HD (aa 2-232), and the HD and C terminus (aa 168 -282) of the Cdx4 protein (Fig. 4A). Consistent with the data presented in Fig. 1, all Cdx proteins activated ftz in a DPE-preferential manner (Fig.  4B). The N termini and the HDs of Cdx1 and Cdx2 proteins were sufficient to confer preferential activation to the GAL4 fusion protein (Fig. 4B). The preferential activation of the reporters by the N terminus and the HD of mCdx4 has a borderline statistical significance (p Ͻ 0.0056). It is of note that the C termini of all mCdx proteins displayed preferential activa- . The region containing the homeodomain and the C terminus of Caudal is sufficient to convey core promoter-preferential activation. A, schematic representation of the DNA fragments that drive firefly luciferase expression and contain five GAL4-binding sites upstream of minimal ftz promoter containing either an mTATA or mDPE motif. B, schematic representation of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain fused to various regions of Caudal. C, Drosophila S2Rϩ cells were co-transfected with the indicated GAL4 DNA-binding domain fusion protein expression vector as well as a firefly luciferase reporter gene driven by five GAL4 sites upstream of a ftz promoter containing either an mTATA or mDPE motif. To normalize for variations in transfection efficiency, cells were co-transfected with a Pol III-Renilla luciferase control plasmid. Cell extracts were assayed for Dual-Luciferase activity. The activities are reported relative to the activity of promoters that were co-transfected with the GAL4-stop expression plasmid, which were defined to be 1. The graph represents an average of three to six independent experiments. Error bars represent S.E. ns, p Ͼ 0.05; *, 0.01 Յ p Յ 0.05; ***, p Յ 0.001.
tion, but the overall transcription levels, especially by mCdx1 and mCdx2, were low.
Drosophila CBP Is a Co-activator for Caudal-regulated Transcriptional Activation of the ftz Reporter-Because Caudal-binding sites are located hundreds of base pairs upstream of the activated promoter, we wanted to identify proteins that might mediate between Caudal binding at the enhancer and the core promoter region. The Caudal-binding sites upstream of the ftz promoter have previously been mapped by DNase I footprinting (45).
Mouse Cdx2 shows functional similarity to Drosophila Caudal in preferentially regulating ftz expression (Fig. 1C). It has previously been demonstrated that Cdx2 makes direct proteinprotein interaction with the N-terminal domain of p300 (72). Notably, Drosophila only has one p300/CBP ortholog, named dCBP or nejire. ChIP analysis of Drosophila embryos using dCBP antibodies (73) revealed a cluster of dCBP-binding sites at the enhancer region of the ftz gene that overlap the previously characterized Caudal-binding sites in the ftz enhancer (Fig. 5A). Thus, we hypothesized that dCBP may serve as a co-activator for the core promoter-preferential activation exhibited by Caudal.
To test the ability of dCBP to co-activate Caudal regulated transcriptional activation of the ftz mTATA and mDPE reporters, we used transient transfection assays in S2Rϩ cells. Cells were co-transfected with Caudal as well as either wild-type dCBP, a previously characterized dCBP HAT domain mutant (

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 17299
(depicted in Fig. 5B). As can be seen in Fig. 5C, wild-type dCBP co-activated the Caudal-regulated transcriptional activation of the ftz reporter about 3-fold relative to Caudal-mediated ftz activation. Notably, S2Rϩ cells express moderate levels of endogenous dCBP (FlyBase), and it is possible that the activation observed by transfected Caudal in the absence of co-transfected dCBP already involves co-activation by endogenous dCBP. The mutated HAT dCBP was able to co-activate the Caudal-regulated transactivation of the ftz mTATA reporter albeit to a lower degree, suggesting that the HAT domain contributes to the DPE-specific transcription mediated by Caudal.
Based on the previously published protein-protein interaction between Cdx2 and the N-terminal domain of p300 (72), we examined whether the N-terminal region of dCBP might be involved in co-activating Caudal-mediated transcription. To that end, we constructed two N-terminal deletion mutants: dCBP ⌬2-600 in which the transcriptional adaptor zinc-binding (TAZ) domain has been deleted, and dCBP ⌬2-1020 in which both the TAZ and KIX domains have been deleted (Fig.  5B). The TAZ and KIX domains were shown to be important for protein-protein interactions (for reviews, see Refs. 74 -76). Deletion of amino acids 2-600 reduced dCBP co-activation,  Caudal binding sites *** ** * FIGURE 5. Drosophila CBP co-activates Caudal-regulated preferential transcriptional activation of the ftz reporter via the N terminus of CBP as well as the HAT domain. A, CBP occupancy at the ftz genomic locus in WT embryos overlaps previously defined Caudal DNA-binding sites. ChIP-sequencing peaks for CBP in 2-4-h-old WT embryos (73) are shown for the ftz locus. Caudal DNA-binding sites that have previously been characterized using DNase I footprinting (45) are shown below. B, schematic representation of the full-length dCBP protein, the dCBP HAT mutant harboring a point mutation (denoted by a star), and the dCBP mutants harboring internal deletions. C, Drosophila S2Rϩ cells were co-transfected with firefly luciferase reporter constructs driven by the ftz enhancerpromoter containing either an mTATA or mDPE motif as well as plasmids encoding FLAG-Caudal, dCBP, or the indicated dCBP mutants containing either mutation in HAT domain (mutHAT) or internal deletions (marked by ⌬). To normalize for variations in transfection efficiency, cells were co-transfected with a Pol III-Renilla luciferase control plasmid and assayed for Dual-Luciferase activity. The activities are reported relative to the activities of the promoters in the absence of co-transfected Caudal or CBP expression plasmids, which were defined to be 1. The graph represents an average of three to four independent experiments. Error bars represent S.E. ns, p Ͼ 0.05; *, 0.01 Յ p Յ 0.05; **, 0.001 Յ p Յ 0.01; ***, p Յ 0.001. ZnF, zinc finger; Nuc Rec, nuclear receptor coactivator. and deletion of amino acids 2-1020 further reduced dCBP coactivation (Fig. 5C). To examine whether the co-activation of Caudal lies in the N terminus of dCBP (or whether any deletion in dCBP will cause a reduction in co-activation), we generated an additional dCBP deletion mutant in which amino acids 1382-1595 were deleted (dCBP ⌬1382-1595). As expected, this mutant was able to co-activate Caudal (Fig. 5C). Taken together, these results demonstrate that dCBP co-activates Caudal-mediated transcription of the ftz reporter via the DPE motif and that N terminus of dCBP is important for this co-activation.
We next wanted to examine whether dCBP can provide another homeodomain transcription factor, such as Bicoid, the ability to activate transcription with a distinct preference for a DPE motif. dCBP has previously been shown to function as a Bicoid co-activator in S2 cells (77,78). giant (gt) is a Bicoid target gene (79 -81) whose core promoter contains a TATA box, an Inr, and a DPE motif (38). ChIP analysis of Drosophila embryos using dCBP antibodies (73) revealed dCBP-binding sites that overlap the ChIP-chip peaks for Bicoid (82) in the gt enhancer (Fig. 6A).
We analyzed co-activation of gt reporter genes by the Bicoid transcription factor using firefly luciferase reporter genes driven by either a DPE-dependent (containing mTATA) or a TATA-dependent (containing mDPE) version of the gt transcriptional control region from Ϫ2031 to ϩ40 relative to the RNA start site (83). S2Rϩ cells were transfected with either a DPE-dependent or a TATA-dependent gt reporter construct as well as an expression vector for Bicoid and/or dCBP. As can be seen in Fig. 6B, although dCBP co-activated Bicoid-regulated gt transcription it did not provide Bicoid with a preference for a core promoter motif. Notably, the activation of the gt reporters by dCBP in the absence of co-transfected Bicoid did not result from activation of endogenous Bicoid as S2Rϩ do not express bicoid (FlyBase). It likely results from the co-activation of other transcription factors that are expressed in S2Rϩ cells and activate gt. Taken together, the core promoter-preferential co-activation observed for Caudal-mediated transcription is a combination of intrinsic properties of Caudal and dCBP and not a general feature of dCBP.
To determine whether dCBP can co-activate a mini-Caudal protein containing either the N terminus and HD or the HD and the C terminus, we co-transfected S2Rϩ cells with dCBP as well as an expression vector for the N terminus and HD of Caudal or the HD and the C terminus of Caudal (depicted in Fig. 7A). Transfection of either mini-Caudal protein did not result in preferential activation of the ftz reporter (Fig. 7B). The fact that a Caudal protein with a deletion of aa 2-268 activated transcription in a core promoter-preferential manner (Fig. 2B) whereas a mini Caudal protein containing aa 270 -427 (HD ϩ C-term.) did not (Fig. 7B) suggests that Lys-269, which is only a few aa away from the HD sequence (spanning aa 275-332 of Drosophila Caudal), participates in DNA binding.
Strikingly, co-transfection of dCBP was able to confer the ability to preferentially activate the DPE-dependent ftz reporter to each of the mini-Caudal proteins. Hence, it is the unique combination of dCBP and Caudal that enables the co-activation of the ftz in a core promoter-preferential manner.

Discussion
The Ability of Drosophila Caudal to Preferentially Activate DPE Transcription Is Conserved to Mouse Cdx Proteins-The vertebrate Cdx genes (Cdx1, Cdx2, and Cdx4) are related to Drosophila Caudal, and their gene products have conserved the ancestral ability to specify the posterior development of the embryo and pattern the anterior-posterior axis. A preference for activators to work with a TATA box, an Inr, or both a TATA box and an Inr has previously been demonstrated using synthetic core promoters (84). We examined the transcriptional activation of the natural ftz promoter in Drosophila Schneider S2Rϩ cells and discovered that the mouse Cdx1, Cdx2, and Cdx4 transcription factors have the ability to preferentially activate DPE-dependent promoters. These findings imply that the core promoter composition plays a role in transcriptional regulation of gene expression in vertebrates. It remains to be determined which of the mouse target genes of the Cdx family of transcription factors are preferentially activated via the DPE. The Cdx proteins are master regulators of Hox gene expression (55,58,59,61,(85)(86)(87). Further characterization of the molecular mechanism governing transcriptional activation by the vertebrate Cdx proteins via the core promoter will advance our understanding of the regulation of Hox gene expression by Cdx family transcription factors.
Core Promoter-preferential Activation of ftz Is Mediated via the Homeodomain and C Terminus of Drosophila Caudal and the Homeodomain and N Termini of the Cdx Proteins-Caudal has previously been shown to preferentially activate transcription of its target ftz through the DPE motif, but the mechanism by which Caudal discriminates between different core promoters was unclear. Here, we discovered that a region containing the C terminus of Caudal was essential for core promoter-specific activation of ftz and that a region containing both the Drosophila Caudal HD and the C terminus was sufficient to confer core promoter-preferential activation to GAL4-DBD. Similarly, vertebrate Cdx1, Cdx2, and Cdx4 conferred preferential activation to the GAL4-DBD. Notably, the Caudal HD region was unable to mediate core-promoter specific activation when fused to the N-terminal region. Accordingly, not all HD-containing transcription factors possessed such core promoterpreferential activation, and Caudal was unique in its ability. Hence, the HD, in addition to DNA binding, might provide a unique moiety that works in concert with the C terminus of Drosophila Caudal to enable core promoter-preferential activation. It remains to be determined whether transcription factors that bear similarity to the HD and C terminus of Caudal possess core promoter-preferential capabilities.
Drosophila CBP Co-activates Caudal-regulated Preferential Activation of ftz-Because the regulation of ftz by Caudal involves the interaction of Caudal with an enhancer region located hundreds of base pairs away from the promoter, we hypothesized that there is a co-activator that serves as a core promoter-specific mediator between the enhancer and promoter. We discovered that dCBP co-activates Caudal-mediated DPE-preferential activation of the ftz enhancer-promoter. Furthermore, we demonstrated that both the HAT activity and the N terminus of dCBP contribute to the DPE-preferential activa-

Structure-Function Analysis of Caudal
tion. The N terminus of dCBP contains both the TAZ and KIX domains of dCBP that have been shown to interact with multiple transcription factors. Hence, it is possible that the N terminus of dCBP also interacts with Caudal. Moreover, the acetyltransferase activity of dCBP is not the only determining factor in co-activation of the ftz Caudal target gene. We have further demonstrated that dCBP does not confer core promoter-preferential activation to Bicoid-mediated transcription. Taken together, our data shed light on the mechanism of core promoterspecific transcriptional regulation by Caudal. . Drosophila CBP co-activates Bicoid-regulated transcriptional activation of the gt reporter without a preference for a TATA box or a DPE motif. A, CBP and Bicoid occupancy at the gt locus in WT embryos. ChIP-sequencing peaks for CBP (73) and ChIP-chip peaks for Bicoid (82) in 2-4-h old WT embryos are shown for the gt locus. Occupancy is plotted as log 2 -fold enrichment over input. B, Drosophila S2Rϩ cells were co-transfected with gt reporter constructs that contain the gt enhancer and promoter sequences from Ϫ2031 to ϩ40 relative to the ϩ1 start site and are identical except for an mTATA or mDPE motif as well as an expression vector for Bicoid and/or dCBP. To normalize for variations in transfection efficiency, cells were co-transfected with a Pol III-Renilla luciferase control plasmid and assayed for Dual-Luciferase activity. The activities are reported relative to the activities of the promoters in the absence of co-transfected Bicoid or dCBP expression plasmids, which were defined to be 1. The graph represents an average of three independent experiments. Error bars represent S.E.

Structure-Function Analysis of Caudal
Remarkably, dCBP has been shown to preferentially co-occupy genomic regions with the Dorsal transcription factor that is a key regulator of dorsal-ventral patterning. We have previously shown that the DPE is a transcriptional element shared by many Dorsal target genes (88). It remains to be determined whether co-activation of Dorsal targets by dCBP is influenced by the core promoter composition. The blue box at the N terminus of the Caudal expression constructs denotes a FLAG tag. B, Drosophila S2Rϩ cells were co-transfected with ftz reporter constructs containing either an mTATA or a mDPE motif as well as plasmids encoding dCBP, FLAG-tagged full-length-Caudal, or a mini-Caudal protein as depicted. To normalize for variations in transfection efficiency, cells were co-transfected with a Pol III-Renilla luciferase control plasmid and assayed for Dual-Luciferase activity. The activities are reported relative to the activities of the promoters in the absence of co-transfected Caudal or dCBP expression plasmids, which were defined to be 1. The graph represents an average of three independent experiments. Error bars represent S.E. ns, p Ͼ 0.05; ***, p Յ 0.001.