Multiple Quality Control Pathways Limit Non-protein Amino Acid Use by Yeast Cytoplasmic Phenylalanyl-tRNA Synthetase*

Non-protein amino acids, particularly isomers of the proteinogenic amino acids, present a threat to proteome integrity if they are mistakenly inserted into proteins. Quality control during aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis reduces non-protein amino acid incorporation by both substrate discrimination and proofreading. For example phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS) proofreads the non-protein hydroxylated phenylalanine derivative m-Tyr after its attachment to tRNAPhe. We now show in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that PheRS misacylation of tRNAPhe with the more abundant Phe oxidation product o-Tyr is limited by kinetic discrimination against o-Tyr-AMP in the transfer step followed by o-Tyr-AMP release from the synthetic active site. This selective rejection of a non-protein aminoacyl-adenylate is in addition to known kinetic discrimination against certain non-cognates in the activation step as well as catalytic hydrolysis of mispaired aminoacyl-tRNAPhe species. We also report an unexpected resistance to cytotoxicity by a S. cerevisiae mutant with ablated post-transfer editing activity when supplemented with o-Tyr, cognate Phe, or Ala, the latter of which is not a substrate for activation by this enzyme. Our phenotypic, metabolomic, and kinetic analyses indicate at least three modes of discrimination against non-protein amino acids by S. cerevisiae PheRS and support a non-canonical role for SccytoPheRS post-transfer editing in response to amino acid stress.

The units of genetic information contained in mRNA codons need to be precisely translated at the ribosome into corresponding amino acid sequences in proteins. Because protein function is dictated by structure and, thus, amino acid sequence, mistakes in translation of the genetic code can yield drastic alterations in the properties of products of mistranslation. Quality control mechanisms exist that help maintain translation fidelity, limiting mistranslation to one mistake in 10 3 -10 4 codons under normal growth conditions (1). The ami-noacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) 2 enzymes, which pair amino acids and tRNAs for participation as substrates in protein synthesis, are among the primary determinants of translational fidelity. In the event that a non-cognate amino acid or tRNA is utilized as an aaRS substrate, the resulting mispaired aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) species may lead to an error in decoding at the ribosome, resulting in mistranslation of the genetic code. To limit these errors, aaRS enzymes have evolved strict quality control mechanisms, which typically confer high substrate specificity and contribute to an estimated rate of mispaired aa-tRNA production limited to roughly 1 per 3000 aa-tRNAs produced (2), although deviations exist between species and specific aaRSs (1,3,4). Some aaRS enzymes hydrolyze or selectively release (5) aminoacyl-adenylate (aa-AMP) species resulting from non-cognate amino acid activation in a quality control step before transfer of the aminoacyl moiety to tRNA. This "pretransfer" editing can be tRNA-dependent (6) or tRNA-independent (7). Approximately half of aaRS enzymes bear a "posttransfer" editing domain distinct from the synthetic domain (8). The active sites of these editing domains serve to recognize misacylated tRNA species and hydrolyze mispaired aa-tRNA ester linkages. aaRSs also rely heavily on substrate discrimination in the synthetic active site. Amino acids or tRNAs with incompatible biophysical geometry in an aaRS active site may bind weakly if at all. As a result, poor substrates for aaRS catalysis are limited in their participation in aa-tRNA synthesis and, thus, ribosomal translation.
Translational fidelity mediated by aaRS enzymes can be a context-dependent phenomenon. In particular, a shift in the abundance of an aaRS cognate or non-cognate substrate may result in unusually high misacylation of tRNAs. Illustrative of this effect is the observation that Chinese hamster ovary cells starved for tyrosine exhibit a high degree of mistranslation of Tyr codons as Phe (9). Rather than relying on editing activity, tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase exhibits high kinetic discrimination between Tyr and Phe at the amino acid activation step. In an environment depleted for its cognate Tyr, an unusually high degree of near-cognate Phe utilization by TyrRS and mistranslation of Tyr codons as Phe are observed. Oxidative stress also plays an important role in non-cognate aa-tRNA synthesis either by generating non-protein amino acids, which must then be proofread (10), or by direct inactivation of such proofreading (10 -12). Oxidative stress effects an increase in reactive oxygen species, which may directly damage amino acids. For example, Phe may be oxidatively converted to one of several derivatives. Among these are the proteinogenic amino acid p-Tyr and the non-protein amino acids 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA), ortho-tyrosine (o-Tyr), and meta-tyrosine (m-Tyr) (Fig. 1). Of these, only m-Tyr is a threat to translational fidelity in an Escherichia coli (E. coli) phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (EcPheRS) mutant strain defective in post-transfer editing activity (10). The post-transfer editing activity of the wild-type enzyme can hydrolyze m-Tyr-tRNA Phe species that are synthesized as m-Tyr accumulates under conditions of oxidative stress. p-Tyr, which is present at levels necessary for typical protein synthesis under normal conditions, is the most obvious candidate as a non-cognate threat to PheRS product specificity; surprisingly, p-Tyr presents no such challenge to EcPheRS. Without wild-type EcPheRS post-transfer editing activity, E. coli grows as well as wild type, even when challenged with an excess of p-Tyr. Kinetic analysis revealed a high degree of EcPheRS discrimination in the amino acid activation step against p-Tyr but not m-Tyr. Taken together, these observations show that normal EcPheRS editing activity is critical, not under typical growth conditions, but to protect E. coli from cytotoxic mistranslation of Phe codons in conditions that favor intracellular accumulation of m-Tyr (10).
In contrast to the E. coli enzyme, Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytoplasmic PheRS (SccytoPheRS) exhibits poor discrimination in the amino acid activation step against p-Tyr (ϳ20-fold lower than EcPheRS), but p-Tyr-tRNA Phe production is limited by post-transfer editing (10). As with EcPheRS, SccytoPheRS post-transfer editing of m-Tyr-tRNA Phe limits cytotoxicity of m-Tyr. Here, we show unexpected phenotypic effects of direct media supplementation of S. cerevisiae with cognate Phe, proteinogenic non-cognate Ala, and non-protein oxidized Phe derivatives in a SccytoPheRS post-transfer quality control mutant. We highlight striking differences in the promiscuity of the yeast and bacterial enzymes for non-protein amino acids and discuss multiple strategies employed by SccytoPheRS to maintain product specificity in the face of conditional threats to translational quality control in a biological context.

Experimental Procedures
Strains and Growth Conditions-We previously constructed a ␤D243A SccytoPheRS strain with defective post-transfer editing activity (frs1Ϫ1), and a wild-type strain constructed from this background, which we refer to as wild type throughout this manuscript (13). Wild type and frs1Ϫ1 S. cerevisiae stain were grown in the presence of varying levels of supplemented amino acids as indicated at 30°C in a 96-well microplate format (xMark TM Microplate Absorbance Spectrophotometer, Bio-Rad), and optical density at 600 nm was measured at 30-min intervals after brief agitation. To characterize growth under oxidative stress conditions, wild-type and frs1Ϫ1 S. cerevisiae strain were grown in minimal media. 50-ml cultures were prepared in triplicate for each condition, and shaken at 240 rpm, 30°C. Optical density at 600 nm was measured at various time points. Oxidative stress cultures contained 2.0 mM paraquat (methyl viologen dichloride, Sigma). 10-ml samples of exponentially growing culture were passed over Whatman Protran BA85 nitrocellulose filter membranes, washed with 10 ml of water, and stored at Ϫ80°C for processing and analysis of intracellular amino acid abundance.
Quantification of Intracellular Amino Acid Abundance-Frozen cell pellets were processed for analysis as previously described (10). Briefly, a mixture of 13 C internal standards for Phe, p-Tyr, and L-DOPA were added to each cell pellet before extraction in Ϫ20°C extraction buffer (40% methanol, 40% acetonitrile, 20% water). Solutions were clarified by centrifugation at 16,000 ϫ g for 5 min at 4°C. Supernatants were transferred to clean tubes and vacuum-dried. Dried samples were re-dissolved in solvent A (water/formic acid, 100/0.1, v/v; 50 l) and centrifuged (16,000 ϫ g, 5 min), and the supernatant was trans- ferred to LC injector vials. Aliquots of the supernatant (typically 4 l) were injected onto a reverse phase HPLC column (Phenomenex Kinetex C18, 2.1 ϫ 150 mm, 1.7-m particle size, 100 Å pore size) equilibrated in solvent A and isocratically eluted (100 l/m). The effluent from the column was directly connected to an electrospray ion source (Agilent Jet Stream) attached to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent 6460) scanning in the positive multiple reaction monitoring mode with standard resolution settings (FWHM 0.7) using previously optimized conditions for the following transitions: Liquid Chromatographic Purification of Amino Acids-The accuracy of kinetic analyses of non-cognate amino acid substrates for enzyme specificity determination depends on the degree of cognate amino acid contamination (14). Therefore, we purified p-Tyr, DL-o-Tyr, and L-DOPA before their use for kinetic analyses. p-Tyr (Regis Chemical Co.) was purified by recrystallization from a minimal volume of boiling water as previously described (15). DL-o-Tyrosine (o-Tyr, Fluka, Ͼ96.0% nonaqueous titration) was dissolved in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and injected (250 l aliquots) onto a thoroughly washed semipreparative reverse phase HPLC column (Keystone Scientific Aquasil C18, 250 ϫ 10 mm) equilibrated and eluted (3 ml/min) with water. 30-s fractions were collected, and aliquots (8 l) of individual fractions across the peak of 280-nm absorbance eluting between 12.5 and 15 min were screened by LC/MS with 8-l injections onto an Imtakt Scherzo SS C18 column (100 ϫ 2 mm) equilibrated in eluent A (water/acetonitrile/formic acid, 97/3/0.1) and eluted with an increasing concentration of eluent B (45 mM ammonium formate/acetonitrile 65/35, min/% B; 0/0, 10/0, 40/20, 42/0, 55/0) with the mass spectrometer (Agilent 6460) scanning in the positive ion mode from m/z 100 -300. . With limits of detection for p-Tyr, m-Tyr, and Phe estimated to be below 3.6, 4.5, and 1.4 ϫ 10 4 area counts, respectively, fractions 27-29 appeared to contain Ͻ1 part in 10 4 of either p-Tyr, m-Tyr, or Phe. Fractions 27-29 were pooled, lyophilized to dryness, weighed (4 mg) and used for the experiments described below. L-DOPA (Sigma) was purified in an identical manner using the same semi-preparative column after it had been thoroughly washed to remove traces of residual analytes. Fractions containing the 280-nm peak of absorption eluting between 11 and 14 min were screened by LC/MS as described above. Fractions 23-28 contained a large peak for L-DOPA with no detectable amount of p-Tyr, m-Tyr, o-Tyr or Phe. These fractions were pooled, lyophilized to dryness (7.2 mg), and used for the experiments described below.
Wild-type and Post-transfer Editing-defective SccytoPheRS Preparation-His 6 -tagged wild type and post-transfer editingdefective SccytoPheRS were purified from previously constructed strains (16) and dialyzed against PP i to clear the active site of pre-bound Phe as before (10). Active enzyme stock concentrations were determined as previously described (17).
Steady-state Kinetic Analysis of SccytoPheRS-SccytoPheRS kinetic parameters for amino acid activation were determined by measurement of time-course ATP/PP i exchange using standard protocols (8 -10, 16). Wild-type SccytoPheRS Aminoacylation of tRNA-Transcription of tRNA Phe ⌬A76 in vitro, tRNA Phe ⌬A76 radiolabeling with tRNA nucleotidyltransferase, and analysis of the relative efficiency of aminoacylation of tRNA Phe by PheRS were carried out as reported previously (10). The ratio of aa-[ 32 P]AMP and [ 32 P]AMP accumulation over time was used as a measure for the relative efficiency in SccyoPheRS aminoacylation of tRNA Phe with a given amino acid.
Pretransfer Editing-Analysis of pretransfer editing was carried out as previously described (7) Reactions were carried out at 30°C and quenched with 0.5 M NaOAc. An equal volume of quenched reaction mix and 1:10 diluted S1 were mixed, and the S1 nuclease reaction was carried out at 37°C for 30 min. 1.5 l of each time point was spotted on polyethyleneimine cellulose and developed as detailed above. aa-tRNA formation over time was fitted to the single-exponential Measurement of o-Tyr-AMP Stability-o-Tyr-AMP was synthesized under aminoacylation reaction conditions described above in the absence of tRNA Phe using [␣-32 P]ATP. o-Tyr-AMP was then purified after 15 min via standard acidic phenolchloroform extraction techniques. The stability of ϳ14 M o-Tyr-AMP under reaction conditions in the absence of enzyme was observed by TLC separation, as above.

SccytoPheRS Post-transfer Editing Limits the Cytotoxicity of
Oxidative Stress-After our observations that PheRS posttransfer editing activity is required to protect E. coli from m-Tyr, we examined the role that post-transfer editing activity plays in a eukaryotic species, S. cerevisiae. Having previously demonstrated that p-Tyr and m-Tyr are more toxic to a cytosolic SccytoPheRS post-transfer editing mutant strain (frs1Ϫ1) (10), we examined a possible protective effect of editing in the presence of oxidative stress. Methyl viologen (paraquat) is used as a surrogate for oxidative stress, as it exacerbates electron transport leakage from the mitochondrion and single-hydrogen reduction of molecular oxygen. We found that Sccyto-PheRS post-transfer editing activity limited the toxicity of paraquat (Fig. 2), suggesting a similar protective role of PheRS post-transfer editing in both bacteria and eukarya under oxidative stress.
Oxidized Phe Derivatives Accumulate Under Oxidative Stress-To test if the protective role that SccytoPheRS posttransfer editing plays in S. cerevisiae is due to a decrease in the availability of intracellular Phe, accumulation of non-cognate PheRS substrates, or some indirect effect, we extracted soluble intracellular metabolites from exponentially growing S. cerevisiae grown in minimal media and examined by LC-MS/MS the relative molar abundance of putative SccytoPheRS substrates (   unstressed S. cerevisiae, accumulates to 1-2 orders of magnitude greater than o-Tyr or m-Tyr, which may represent oxidation of intracellular p-Tyr as well as Phe. We also observed that unstressed S. cerevisiae grown in rich media contain levels of L-DOPA similar to those in stressed cultures (not shown). This suggests a degree of L-DOPA contamination in rich media components and subsequent cellular uptake. Because commercial yeast extracts and peptones are undefined and may become oxidized over time, the degree of non-protein amino acid contamination is a challenge to interpretation of results with such undefined media components.
SccytoPheRS Post-transfer Editing Has Amino Acid Supplement-dependent Effects on Growth-To further investigate the possible effects of non-protein aromatic amino acid accumulation, editing defective SccytoPheRS and wildtype S. cerevisiae were grown with o-Tyr and L-DOPA (Fig. 4,  A and B). Given that SccytoPheRS poorly discriminates against p-Tyr relative to the E. coli enzyme, it was not surprising that L-DOPA is more toxic to S. cerevisiae when posttransfer editing activity is ablated. E. coli does not show increased sensitivity to L-DOPA in the absence of EcPheRS post-transfer editing, underscoring an evolutionary divergence in PheRS substrate specificity. Less expected was the complete phenotypic reversal with o-Tyr supplementation. The post-transfer editing-ablated SccytoPheRS strain tolerates o-Tyr better than wild-type S. cerevisiae. When supplemented with either cognate Phe or non-cognate Ala (Fig. 4, C and D), the post-transfer editing mutant also grew better than wild type. The degree of metabolic conversion of o-Tyr or Ala to other substrates is unclear, but the cognate Phe supplementation experiment suggests that the phenotypic effect of post-transfer editing in this condition is independent of its canonical aa-tRNA Phe proofreading activity.
SccytoPheRS Displays Poor Discrimination against Oxidized Phe Derivatives in Vitro-To examine the substrate specificity of SccytoPheRS, we compared steady-state activation of Phe, o-Tyr, m-Tyr, p-Tyr, L-DOPA, and Ala. No detectable activity was found for 1 mM Ala at 500 nM SccytoPheRS (data not shown), but all oxidized Phe derivatives tested are poorly discriminated against by SccytoPheRS in vitro (Table 1). Values for p-Tyr and m-Tyr are adapted from our previous work (10). o-Tyr, in particular, is only an order of magnitude less efficiently activated than Phe, suggesting a substantial threat to SccytoPheRS product specificity and probable Phe codon mistranslation without an o-Tyrspecific quality control mechanism. An Expanded Form of aaRS Biological Substrate Selectivity-Enzyme specificity for a given substrate is calculated by a comparison of reaction rates. Because it is effectively impossible to identify every potential substrate for aaRS activity that may exist, it is practical to simply include terms for known non-cognates and express biological selectivity as less than or equal to the calculated value. For SccytoPheRS, we now include terms for o-Tyr, m-Tyr, p-Tyr, and L-DOPA (Table 2). Of the 19 possible ring-hydroxylated non-cognate Phe derivatives, only 4 were tested here. Moreover, Phe modification need not be limited to hydroxylation of the phenyl ring alone. Phe hydroperoxides, nitrosylated derivatives, or any number of alternatively modified Phe derivatives may be substrates for this enzyme. The intracellular abundance of multiple oxidized Phe derivatives increased under the oxidative stress conditions chosen (Fig. 3). In this case, selectivity is driven primarily by Phe and p-Tyr abundance. When expanded to include all untested SccytoPheRS substrates and variable environmental stresses that cause non-protein amino acids to accumulate, the combined effect of many non-cognates represents a substantial conditional burden to the fidelity of Phe codon translation. The known promiscuity of SccytoPheRS implies that multiple quality control mechanisms address the threat of various non-cognate amino acids that may be misactivated to a greater degree in various environmental contexts. Aminoacylation of tRNA Phe with o-Tyr Is Inefficient-The observed poor discrimination against o-Tyr during amino acid activation suggested that a later quality control mechanism may prevent substantial o-Tyr-tRNA Phe production. The efficiency of o-Tyr-tRNA Phe production was tested in vitro using purified post-transfer editing ablated SccytoPheRS. o-Tyr-tRNA Phe was synthesized to a level of ϳ10% of chargeable tRNA Phe , which is substantially lower than the ϳ60% charging observed with p-Tyr (Fig. 5). Because the post-transfer editingdefective SccytoPheRS enzyme was used for this aminoacylation, o-Tyr-tRNA Phe limitation is not due to post-transfer editing but must come at a step after activation given the ϳ10-fold superior efficiency in o-Tyr activation when compared with p-Tyr (Table 1). No difference in aminoacylation efficiency is observed between wild-type and ␤D243A SccytoPheRS for either Phe or o-Tyr (supplemental Fig. 1).

General enzyme specificity
o-Tyr-tRNA Phe Limitation Is Not Due to Hydrolytic Pre-Transfer Editing-Selective hydrolysis of the products of amino acid misactivation is an established mechanism of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase quality control. To test if o-Tyr-AMP is selectively hydrolyzed after activation, we observed o-Tyr-AMP and AMP accumulation in vitro. If o-Tyr-AMP were efficiently hydrolyzed after activation, we would see an accumulation of one of the products of this hydrolysis, AMP, faster than the accumulation of o-Tyr-AMP. However, we see that steady-state o-Tyr-AMP accumulation is 3-4 M/min, whereas AMP does  JULY 22, 2016 • VOLUME 291 • NUMBER 30 not accumulate appreciably at all by 2 min (Fig. 6), indicating that o-Tyr activation is faster than o-Tyr-AMP hydrolysis. Therefore, rapid pretransfer hydrolysis of o-Tyr-AMP does not provide a likely mechanism to limit o-Tyr-tRNA Phe synthesis by SccytoPheRS.

Multiple Product Specificity Determinants in Yeast CytoPheRS
o-Tyr-AMP Is Released from the SccytoPheRS Active Site-To test if o-Tyr-tRNA Phe limitation is due to selective release of o-Tyr-AMP from the SccytoPheRS active site, we observed the accumulation of o-Tyr-AMP relative to the concentration of SccytoPheRS in vitro. o-Tyr-AMP accumulates to a concentration 17-fold greater than the concentration of post-transfer editing defective SccytoPheRS by 2 min (Fig. 6), suggesting multiple turnover events in o-Tyr activation as well as release of o-Tyr-AMP from the enzyme active site. Activation of o-Tyr is less efficient in the absence of tRNA Phe (supplemental Fig. 2), which may reflect a more stable activation complex or direct interaction of tRNA Phe in activation chemistry.
o-Tyr-AMP Release Is Due to Slow Transfer-Whereas o-Tyr-AMP has now been shown to be released from the SccytoPheRS active site before transfer, it was unclear if this release is competitive with the rate of o-Tyr transfer from o-Tyr-AMP to tRNA Phe or if there is kinetic discrimination arising from slow o-Tyr transfer. We addressed this ambiguity by comparing the rate of presteady-state transfer for cognate Phe and non-cog-nate p-Tyr to that of o-Tyr. The rate of Phe transfer from Phe-AMP to tRNA Phe was 2.3 s Ϫ1 Ϯ 0.3 s Ϫ1 , and the rate of p-Tyr transfer was 2.1 s Ϫ1 Ϯ 0.2 s Ϫ1 . o-Tyr transfer from o-Tyr-AMP to tRNA Phe was undetectable over the same time scale, indicating strong kinetic discrimination against o-Tyr in the transfer step. Notably, Phe and p-Tyr transfer are effectively identical, indicating kinetic discrimination at the transfer step is a mechanism specific to o-Tyr and not non-cognate p-Tyr.

Discussion
Limitation of o-Tyr-tRNA Phe by SccytoPheRS-Whereas kinetic discrimination against o-Tyr is poor at the activation step (Table 1), o-Tyr-tRNA Phe is not produced efficiently, independent of post-transfer editing activity (Fig. 5). Despite a 10-fold higher activity in activation when compared with p-Tyr, o-Tyr is much less efficiently acylated to tRNA Phe . These observations suggest a quality control mechanism distinct from established post-transfer editing activity, which acts to limit o-Tyr-tRNA Phe production. Analysis of the products of o-Tyrstimulated ATPase activity revealed rapid o-Tyr-AMP synthesis (Fig. 6), consistent with activation data (Table 1). AMP accumulation is minimal when compared with o-Tyr-AMP synthesis, suggesting that if hydrolysis of o-Tyr-AMP does contribute to quality control, it is outweighed by the specific rejection of o-Tyr-AMP as the primary effector of pretransfer quality control.
o-Tyr-AMP release may be due to either poor substrate selection in the transfer step resulting in entropic dissociation or to selective adenylate release in competition with an otherwise rapid transfer step. To determine if selective o-Tyr-AMP release is due to inefficiency in the transfer step, we measured the rate of o-Tyr transfer under single-turnover conditions and found that o-Tyr transfers much slower than cognate Phe transfer. Taken together, our data demonstrate that o-Tyr is efficiently activated, but the resulting o-Tyr-AMP is a poor substrate for transfer to tRNA Phe . Much of the o-Tyr-AMP produced is released from the SccytoPheRS synthetic active site, although low level transfer does contribute to a minimal degree of aminoacylation of tRNA Phe with o-Tyr (Fig. 5). This mechanism for preventing a non-protein amino acid from threatening the product specificity of SccytoPheRS is in addition to the high substrate discrimination against most amino acids in the activation step as well as the established post-transfer editing activity that limits p-Tyr-tRNA Phe and m-Tyr-tRNA Phe release. Simultaneous pre-and post-transfer editing activity is not unique to SccytoPheRS (20,21). Human cytoplasmic LeuRS, like SccytoPheRS, is threatened with multiple nonprotein amino acids, requiring distinct mechanisms of quality control by the same enzyme; whereas norvaline is a target for post-transfer editing activity, ␣-aminobutyrate is primarily a substrate for pretransfer editing by this enzyme (21).
Our findings show that SccytoPheRS bears not only posttransfer editing activity against proteinogenic and non-protein amino acids but both kinetic discrimination against noncognate amino acids at the activation step and kinetic discrimination against a noncognate aminoacyl-adenylate at the transfer step, specifically one derived from a non-protein amino acid. Moreover, the poor discrimination against o-Tyr observed at

TABLE 2 SccytoPheRS selectivity is decreased under oxidative stress
Wild-type and post-transfer editing-defective SccytoPheRS biological selectivity with and without 2.0 mM paraquat is shown. Data are the average of three replicates Ϯ S.E. Wild-type SccytoPheRS selectivity was decreased 3-fold under oxidative stress (p ϭ 0.0003). Post-transfer editing ablated SccytoPheRS selectivity was decreased 2-fold under oxidative stress (p Ͻ 0.0001). No statistically significant difference in selectivity exists between strains either without paraquat (p ϭ 0.2668) or with paraquat (p ϭ 0.0584).

SccytoPheRS biological Phe selectivity
Wild type frs1-1 Wild type, 2.0 mM paraquat frs1-1, 2.0 mM paraquat the activation step yields misleading specificity calculations (Table 1) because the substrate specificity employed by this enzyme is primarily at a step after activation. Non-protein amino acids are an under-examined threat to translational fidelity due primarily to the only recent advances in chromatographic separation and quantitation of them in the face of large amounts of proteinogenic amino acids with nearly identical biophysical properties in biological samples.
Environmental conditions may drastically alter the intracellular concentration of a given amino acid, skewing the selectivity of the relevant aaRS in vivo. Theoretically, the catalytic efficiency of a given aaRS for any of its substrates may also be context-dependent. However, direct measurement of k cat /K m for every potential substrate in vivo is problematic, particularly when the added dimension of environmentally dependent catalytic efficiency is included. Accounting for conditional substrate abundance, discrimination against m-Tyr is ϳ240,000 under typical growth conditions and ϳ120,000 in the presence of 2.0 mM paraquat, which would normally indicate no further requirement for quality control. However, SccytoPheRS does bear moderate post-transfer editing activity against m-Tyr-tRNA Phe , suggesting that the requirements for SccytoPheRS product specificity may be higher than the aggregate expected rate of one mispaired aminoacyl-tRNA species in 3000 aa-tRNAs produced (2). Given that the discrimination against o-Tyr is only ϳ24,000 under typical growth conditions and ϳ6,900 in the presence of 2.0 mM paraquat (much lower discrimination than against m-Tyr), kinetic discrimination against o-Tyr-AMP by SccytoPheRS may play a role in Phe codon quality control at biologically relevant levels, particularly in conditions that favor oxidation of intracellular Phe. Alternatively, the import of exogenous o-Tyr is a plausible scenario, as structurally similar m-Tyr has been shown to be produced and exported by certain plant species in order to shape the ecology of their environments and inhibit the growth of competitor species (22). Production and export of non-protein amino acids is an effective strategy for chemically shaping a competitive environmental niche, provided the producer has the means to prevent the cytotoxic incorporation of these species (for review, see reviewed see Ref. 23).
Extended exposure of S. cerevisiae to low levels of hydrogen peroxide increases the level of protein o-Tyr and m-Tyr in mutants defective in glutathione metabolism (24), although it is unclear whether this reflects oxidation of protein post-translationally or oxidation of intracellular Phe and subsequent mistranslation. Recently, monoclonal antibody production in Chinese hamster ovary cells limited in intracellular Phe has been shown to yield protein products with m-Tyr and o-Tyr at Phe codons (25). Interestingly, p-Tyr is not detected at these codons, suggesting that non-protein amino acid derivatives are a unique threat to the mammalian system. This finding is a surprise because the post-transfer editing activity that limits p-Tyr-tRNA Phe production is apparently insufficient to prevent m-Tyr misincorporation despite m-Tyr-tRNA Phe editing activity in SccytoPheRS. Further testing with mammalian cytoplasmic PheRS is needed to address this apparent discrepancy.
o-Tyr presents only a minor threat at Phe codons throughout the lifespan of a typical yeast cell, but in long-lived cell types, such as terminally differentiated neuronal cells, the cumulative effect of protracted low level o-Tyr incorporation may become a problem. o-Tyr and m-Tyr have long been used as biomarkers of age and oxidative damage in proteins, and oxidative damage of neuronal protein correlates with neurodegeneration, but it is not yet clear if a causal relationship exists or what role persistent low level mistranslation with oxidized amino acids may play in disease states in aging and neurodegenerative disease. S. cerevisiae has evolved at least three distinct mechanisms in part to prevent oxidized Phe derivatives from incorporation at Phe codons despite an apparent minimal need for such stringent quality control under normal conditions. The cumulative effects of long term low level mistranslation and oxidative damage merit further study.
SccytoPheRS  limitation and prevent uncharged tRNA Phe sensing (26). This in turn fails to up-regulate Phe biosynthesis, further compounding Phe limitation relative to EcPheRS non-cognates such as m-Tyr. The yeast amino acid starvation-sensing mechanisms are not as directly tied to individual amino acids, instead relying on general uncharged tRNA sensing via GCN2. GCN2, upon binding uncharged tRNA, phosphorylates eIF␣, which causes downstream up-regulation of amino acid biosynthesis genes and simultaneous restriction of general protein synthesis. It is plausible that, as with EcPheRS, a loss of SccytoPheRS editing prevents sensing of Phe starvation due to accumulation of mischarged tRNA Phe species. S. cerevisiae rRNAs and tRNAs are cleaved in a conserved response to oxidative stress. The role of tRNA cleavage products is not well understood, but preliminary work suggests tRNA cleavage as an additional mechanism to limit translation (27,28). Further limitation of uncharged tRNA pools under oxidative stress highlights a challenge to S. cerevisiae at Phe codons. Not only are Phe pools oxidized, forming additional non-cognates that compete for Sccyto-PheRS, but a decrease in global tRNA limits the tRNA Phe available for aminoacylation. This may suggest a need for the decreased levels of available tRNA Phe to be charged accurately in this condition of tightly regulated translation, which underscores the importance for SccytoPheRS product specificity mechanisms under oxidative stress.
A loss of post-transfer editing activity is toxic when yeast are exposed to oxidative stress (Fig. 2), but supplementation with specific PheRS non-cognates yields variable toxic effects (Fig.  4). Post-transfer editing-defective S. cerevisiae does not tolerate m-Tyr, p-Tyr, or L-DOPA as well as wild type, but a reversal of these phenotypes is observed upon supplementation with o-Tyr, cognate Phe, or Ala. If post-transfer editing were only responsible for preventing the supplemented amino acids from misacylation of tRNA Phe and cytotoxic insertion at Phe codons, supplementation with cognate Phe should have no effect, particularly because there is no known phenylalanine hydroxylase in S. cerevisiae to convert Phe to non-cognate p-Tyr. Ala, which is not a substrate for PheRS activation, should play no direct role in tRNA Phe charging at all, although the level of metabolic conversion to alternative SccytoPheRS substrates is unclear. These data suggest an additional role in yeast for post-transfer editing in nutrient sensing, analogous to that observed in E. coli. As a result o-Tyr, Phe, and Ala addition must have some indirect metabolic effects that alter typical growth.
Given the limited insight that can be gained by phenotypic analysis alone, it is not yet clear what role post-transfer editing plays in regulation of cellular growth, and the simple answer of conditional mistranslation may not tell the complete story. Particularly, the negative effect cognate Phe and poor activation substrate Ala have on wild-type growth rate suggest that mistranslation plays only a minor role here. Future work will focus on the metabolic profile of post-transfer editing-defective SccytoPheRS yeast to address the role of post-transfer editing in growth under oxidative stress and growth limitation when intracellular amino acid ratios are atypical. In particular, Phe and p-Tyr levels, which seem to be the primary drivers of substrate specificity (Fig. 3), likely shift in abundance when S. cerevisiae is supplemented with various amino acids. Oxida-tive stress causes accumulation of noncognate species, but the degree to which those species are metabolically converted to alternative SccytoPheRS substrates or to which they interact with alternative metabolic processes is unclear as well. Direct measurement of the levels of mischarged and uncharged aminoacyl-tRNA species will also be a critical step in understanding the role of context-dependent tRNA misacylation in the cell. No matter what the mechanism of growth rate feedback is that describes these phenotypic effects, it is clear that the quality control mechanisms in aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis do not have a role in limiting mistranslation alone.