Structural analysis of the catalytic mechanism and substrate specificity of Anabaena alkaline invertase InvA reveals a novel glucosidase

Invertases catalyze the hydrolysis of sucrose to glucose and fructose, thereby playing a key role in primary metabolism and plant development. According to the optimum pH, invertases are classified into acid invertases (Ac-Invs) and alkaline/neutral invertases (A/N-Invs), which share no sequence homology. Compared to Ac-Invs that have been extensively studied, the structure and catalytic mechanism of A/N-Invs remain unknown. Here we report the crystal structures of Anabaena alkaline invertase InvA, which was proposed to be the ancestor of modern plant A/N-Invs. These structures are the first in the GH100 family. InvA exists as a hexamer in both crystal and solution. Each subunit consists of an (α/α)6 barrel core structure in addition to an insertion of three helices. A couple of structures in complex with the substrate or products enabled us to assign the subsites −1 and +1 specifically binding glucose and fructose, respectively. Structural comparison combined with enzymatic assays indicated that Asp188 and Glu414 are putative catalytic residues. Further analysis of the substrate-binding pocket demonstrated that InvA possesses a stringent substrate specificity towards the α1,2-glycosidic bond of sucrose. Together, we suggest that InvA and homologs represent a novel family of glucosidases. INTRODUCTION Sucrose [α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1-2)-β-D-fructofuranose] is a major product of photosynthesis in plants and cyanobacteria, and can be transported from the source tissues to heterotrophic sinks as a principal carbon carrier molecule (1). In the plant sink tissues, sucrose is degraded into hexoses or derivatives to provide carbon and energy or to act as signaling molecules, for the growth, development and defense of plant (2-5). There are two enzymes that can cleave sucrose: sucrose synthase (SUS, EC 2.4.1.13) and invertase (INV, EC 3.2.1.26) (1). SUS catalyzes the conversion of sucrose to fructose and UDP-glucose in a reversible manner, whereas INV irreversibly


INTRODUCTION
Sucrose [α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1-2)-β-D-fructofuranose] is a major product of photosynthesis in plants and cyanobacteria, and can be transported from the source tissues to heterotrophic sinks as a principal carbon carrier molecule (1).In the plant sink tissues, sucrose is degraded into hexoses or derivatives to provide carbon and energy or to act as signaling molecules, for the growth, development and defense of plant (2)(3)(4)(5).There are two enzymes that can cleave sucrose: sucrose synthase (SUS, EC 2.4.1.13) and invertase (INV, EC 3.2.1.26)(1).SUS catalyzes the conversion of sucrose to fructose and UDP-glucose in a reversible manner, whereas INV irreversibly hydrolyzes sucrose into glucose and fructose.SUS-catalyzed sucrose cleavage is involved in the biosynthesis of storage and structural polysaccharides, such as starch and cellulose, and participates in modulating sink strength of plants (2,6).In contrast, INV plays a central role in particular developmental stages (2,7).For example, the activity of cytosolic INV but not SUS is required for the growth and reproduction of Arabidopsis (7).
Sucrose in cyanobacteria also plays an important role in environmental stress responses, glycogen metabolism and nitrogen fixation as a carbon carrier molecule (8,9).Recent studies implied that cyanobacteria utilize a similar set of enzymes as higher plants to metabolize sucrose; and moreover, these enzymes seem to have a cyanobacterial origin (1,4,10).However, compared to the counterpart in higher plants, the mechanism of sucrose metabolism in cyanobacteria remains largely unclear (1,10).
Invertases have been categorized into two major types according to their optimum pH values: acid invertases (Ac-Invs) with an optimum pH of 4.0-5.5, and alkaline/neutral invertases (A/N-Invs) with an optimum pH of 6.5-8.0 (11,12).Usually, A-Invs and N-Invs share a high sequence homology to each other and are often ambiguous, but differ a lot from Ac-Invs.Ac-Invs can utilize sucrose and other β-fructose-containing oligosaccharides, such as raffinose and kestose, as the substrate, and therefore also termed β-fructofuranosidases (11).In contrast, it is generally accepted that A/N-Invs specifically catalyze the hydrolysis of sucrose (10,11,13).Ac-Invs are mainly localized in cell walls and vacuoles (14), whereas A/N-Invs are generally distributed in the cytosol and organelles, such as mitochondria and plastids (1).In addition, Ac-Invs are widespread in plants, fungi and bacteria, whereas A/N-Invs have been only found in plants and photosynthetic bacteria (1,10).
Here, we report the crystal structures of Anabaena InvA and its complexes with the substrate or product, which represent the first structure of A/N-Invs and the first member of known structures in GH100 family.InvA adopts an overall structure of (α/α) 6 barrel that completely differs from Ac-Invs.Structural analyses combined with activity assays reveal a well defined active-site pocket, which determines the stringent substrate specificity towards the α1,2-glycosidic bond of sucrose.In addition, we assigned active-site residues, which enabled us to propose a putative catalytic mechanism of InvA.The distinct structure and catalytic mechanism indicate that InvA and its homologous A/N-Invs belong to a novel family of glucosidases, but not the previously reported β-fructofuranosidases (23,24).

RESULTS
Overall structure of InvA-We obtained crystals of the full-length InvA (NCBI accession number WP_010995690.1,residues Met1-Leu468) at 2.67 Å resolution, but failed in optimizing the selenomethionine (SeMet)-substituted crystals for phase determination.Partial proteolysis and multiple sequence alignment indicated that both N and C termini are somewhat unstructured.Thus we overexpressed and purified a truncated version of InvA (residues Lys9−Thr460), and successfully optimized its crystal co-crystallized with 200 mM fructose, the 2.11 Å SeMet-substituted crystal of which was used for structure determination.In fact, we have not observed crystals of InvA in the absence of fructose, which was proposed to be an inhibitor of InvA (10).Eventually, we obtained the glucose and sucrose-complexed crystals by soaking crystals of truncated InvA with glucose and sucrose, respectively.The full-length InvA structure and the complex structures of truncated InvA with sucrose and glucose were solved by using the fructose co-crystallized structure (InvA-Fru) as the initial model.The parameters for data collection and structure determination of all structures are listed in Table 1.
In the sucrose-complexed structure (InvA-Suc), which has a space group of C222 1 , each asymmetric unit contains three molecules of InvA.Symmetry operation and assembly analysis using PDBePISA (25) revealed that InvA forms a hexamer (Fig. 1A).Notably, each asymmetric unit of the full-length InvA structure in a space group of P2 1 has six subunits, which also form a hexamer.In fact, InvA exists as hexamer in solution as well, as shown in the gel-filtration profile (Fig. 1B).Further analysis of the dimeric and trimeric interfaces using PDBePISA indicated that the hexamer displays a trimer of dimers (Fig. 1C).The two subunits of each dimer have a total buried interface of ~6400 Å 2 , whereas the two neighboring dimers have an interface of ~2300 Å 2 .
Taking the InvA-Suc structure as an example, the three subunits in each asymmetric unit share an overall structure very similar to each other, with a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.40-0.53Å over 436 Cα atoms.As residues Arg12−Pro458 could be clearly traced in the electron density map of subunit A, we take it as an example for further structure analysis.The DALI search (26) revealed that InvA has a very high structural homology to (α/α) 6 -barrel glycoside hydrolases (GHs) and several phosphorylases.The catalytic domain of a glucoamylase from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum, termed tGA (27), has the highest Z score in the output of GHs (PDB entry 1LF6, Z score 30.2,RMSD 3.1 Å over 330 residues, sequence identity 14%).Similar to the catalytic domains of tGA, InvA monomer consists of an (α/α) 6 -barrel core structure (Fig. 1D).However, superposition of two structures revealed that InvA possesses an insertion of three helices beyond the core structure (Fig. 1E).Notably, InvA significantly differs from the Ac-Invs, which share an all-β structure (15).
In detail, the core (α/α) 6 barrel structure of InvA is mainly composed of 12 α-helices, which are arranged in two concentric layers in a way similar to that of glycoside hydrolases in the clans GH-G, GH-L and GH-M (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32).The 12 α-helices form six helical hairpins, five of which are connected via a short loop, except for α1/α15.The neighboring helical hairpins are further linked by longer inter-hairpin loops, which are proposed to form the catalytic pocket and oligomeric interface.Compared to structure-known (α/α) 6 -barrel glycoside hydrolases, the major difference comes from an insertion (residues Asp246-Gly288) composed of helices α8, α9 and η1.The insertion contributes to the majority of the inter-dimer interactions, which enable the formation of InvA hexamer.Notably, the full-length structure of InvA shares an overall structure almost identical to that of the three truncated complexes, with an RMSDs ranging from 0.25−0.53Å over 437 Cα atoms, except for a loop of the most C-terminal 10 residues from Asp459 to Leu468 (Fig. 1F).
The active-site pocket-In the sucrose-complexed structure InvA-Suc, the three subunits of each asymmetric unit bind three types of small molecules.Subunits A and C accommodate a sucrose molecule in each putative catalytic pocket; however, the two sucrose molecules adopt different conformations in terms of the orientation of the fructosyl moiety (Fig. 2A,  2B).Surprisingly, subunit B binds to a fructose molecule (Fig. 2C), which was most likely incorporated during crystallization.The sucrose molecules in subunits A and C are stabilized by a cluster of inter-hairpin loops.In both subunits, the glucosyl moiety is locked at the inner part (subsite −1) of the pocket by hydrogen bonds with Arg53, Asp54, Met186, Asp188, His371, Gln432 and the water molecule Wat1 (Fig. 2A, 2B).Remarkably, the two side-chain oxygen atoms of Asp54 act as a pair of tweezers to anchor the glucose ring via two hydrogen bonds with O4 and O6 atoms, in a way similar to that of YgjK and tGA (27,28).In subunit A, the fructosyl moiety binds to Asn46, Ile122, Asp188, Arg189 and Tyr370 at subsite +1 via polar interactions (Fig. 2A).In contrast, the fructosyl moiety in subunit C has less contact with the subsite +1, via only three hydrogen bonds with the side chain of Asp188 and one water molecule (Fig. 2B).In addition, hydrophobic interactions from the aromatic residues, such as Phe51, Tyr370 and Trp434, also contribute to stabilizing the sucrose molecule in both subunits.It is worthwhile to mention that in subunit C residues from Leu42 to Asp48 in the loop between β2 and α2 are missing in the electron density map.
Different from subunits A and C, subunit B of InvA-Suc binds a fructose molecule at the subsite +1 (Fig. 2C).This fructose molecule adopts a conformation and binding pattern identical to that in the fructose co-crystallized structure InvA-Fru (Fig. 2D).Moreover, both two fructose molecules from InvA-Suc and InvA-Fru could be well superimposed against the fructosyl moiety of the sucrose at subsite +1 in subunit A of InvA-Suc.
In addition, we also solved the structure of InvA in complex with another product, glucose, termed InvA-Glc.Similar to that of the glucosyl moiety of sucrose in InvA-Suc structure, the glucose molecule occupies subsite −1 in an almost identical binding pattern (Fig. 2E).Notably, we tried extensively to obtain the apo-form structure of InvA; however, only the full-length InvA yielded crystals of a relatively low resolution (2.67 Å).Nevertheless, a glycerol molecule, which was used as the cryoprotectant, occupies the subsite −1 (Fig. 2F).
Taken together, we obtained six structures of the substrate-binding pocket, which is occupied by various molecules.Structural comparisons revealed that the subsites −1 and +1 are stringently selective towards glucose and fructose, respectively.
The enzymatic properties and catalytic residues-To further explore the catalytic mechanism of InvA, we first performed a series of assays to determine its enzymatic parameters.Our purified InvA possesses the highest activity at an optimum pH of 7.9 (Fig. 3), which is similar to the optimum pH determined by Vargas et al. (10).In addition, we detected that InvA has a Michaelis constant (K m ) towards sucrose of 20.8 ± 1.7 mM, comparable to the plant A/N-Invs in a range of 8−30 mM (13,22,(33)(34)(35)(36), but higher than that of Ac-Invs at 0.5-10 mM (37)(38)(39)(40)(41). Furthermore, we determined that InvA has a turnover number (k cat ) of 73.7 ± 1.9 s -1 , at the same level as or somewhat lower than several previously reported Ac-Invs (37,40,42,43).Thus in general InvA has a lower activity compared to Ac-Invs.Despite InvA exists as a hexamer in both crystal and solution, a Hill coefficient (n H ) of 0.88 ± 0.08 indicates no cooperativity among the subunits.Notably, most plant A/N-Invs also assemble into oligomers, either tetramers (23,34,44,45) or octamers (24).
To assign the catalytic residues of InvA, we performed a comparative structural analysis against its structural homologs tGA (Fig. 1E) and Escherichia coli glucosidase YgjK (PDB entry 3W7S, Z score 28.6, RMSD 3.2 Å for 343 residues).Despite sharing only a sequence identity of about 14% and 11%, respectively, to tGA and YgjK, InvA also consists of a very similar (α/α) 6 -barrel catalytic domain (Fig. 1E).Previous reports proposed that tGA and YgjK adopt a general acid-base mechanism to hydrolyze the glycosidic bond using Glu438 and Glu636 of tGA or Asp501 and Glu727 of YgjK (27,28).Structural superposition clearly indicated that residues Asp188 and Glu414 of InvA, in addition to Wat1 and the corresponding loops that harbor these two acidic residues, could be well superimposed against the catalytic residues and the nucleophilic water molecule of both tGA and YgjK (Fig. 4A).Moreover, the side chain of Asp54 of InvA that locks the glucosyl moiety at subsite −1 also adopts a same conformation as the major sugar-binding residue, Asp344 of tGA or Asp324 of YgjK (Fig. 4A).To validate the crucial role of these residues in catalysis, we prepared their single mutants.As predicted, all mutants exhibited no detectable activity towards sucrose (Fig. 4B).Therefore, we propose that InvA utilizes Asp188 and Glu414 as the catalytic residues and adopts the general acid-base mechanism (Fig. 5), similar to that of tGA and YgjK.The hydrolysis is triggered by the nucleophilic attack of the water molecule Wat1 towards the anomeric carbon atom of glucosyl moiety.The catalytic base, Glu414 assists hydrolysis by abstracting a proton from Wat1, whereas the catalytic acid, Asp188 which is on the opposite side, donates a proton to the target oxygen atom, resulting in cleavage of the glycosidic bond.
Stringent substrate specificity-Despite the two types of invertases are capable of hydrolyzing sucrose, A/N-Invs are distinct from Ac-Invs from many points of view.Ac-Invs have been classified into the β-fructofuranosidases, since they are able to catalyze the release of β-fructose from the non-reducing end of various β-fructofuranoside substrates besides sucrose (11,37).Crystal structures demonstrated that the subsite −1 of Ac-Invs specifically recognizes the fructose ring of a given substrate that lies in a rather open pocket, resulting in a broad spectrum of substrates (15).However, the reports concerning the substrate specificity of A/N-Invs are controversial: either specifically hydrolyzing sucrose (10,11,13,33) or also possessing hydrolytic activity towards some β-fructose-containing sugars such as raffinose and stachyose, or maltose in addition to sucrose, albeit at a lower rate (23,24,45,46).As shown in our structures (Fig. 2A,  2B), InvA adopts a rather closed substrate-binding pocket which is perfectly complementary to a sucrose molecule, different from an open catalytic pocket of Ac-Invs.Moreover, the glucosyl moiety is located at the subsite −1 of the substrate-binding pocket of InvA (Fig. 2A, 2B), and the hydrolysis happens to the α1,2 glycosidic bond.
To further explore the substrate specificity of InvA in solution, we tested its hydrolytic activity towards various sugars: oligosaccharides with an α-D-glucopyranosyl moiety at the non-reducing end, such as maltose (Glcα1-4Glc), trehalose (Glcα1-1αGlc) and melezitose (Glcα1-3Fruβ2-1αGlc), in addition to cellobiose (Glcβ1-4Glc) that has a non-reducing β-D-glucose.We also checked the activity of InvA towards raffinose (Galα1-6Glcα1-2βFru), a typical substrate of β-fructofuranosidases.The results suggested that InvA only catalyzes the hydrolysis of sucrose, but not any other selected sugars (Fig. 6).Notably, the trisaccharide melezitose, which has a sucrose moiety with exposed glucosyl residue, could not be hydrolyzed by InvA.Thus we demonstrated that InvA is stringently specific towards sucrose, in agreement with the previous report (10).Multiple-sequence alignment indicated that the catalytic and substrate-binding residues are strictly conserved among all A/N-Invs ranging from cyanobacteria and photosynthetic bacteria to plants (Fig. 7).We therefore hypothesize that InvA and its homologs share a similar substrate-binding pattern and catalytic mechanism.The previous controversies concerning the activity of A/N-Invs are most likely due to contamination during purification of the native enzymes (33).

DISCUSSION
A/N-Invs represent a novel family of glucosidases-Our results demonstrated that InvA, very likely as well as other A/N-Invs, specifically catalyzes the hydrolysis of the α1,2-glycosidic bond in sucrose.A/N-Invs have been exclusively classified into an individual glycoside hydrolase family, termed GH100, in the Carbohydrate Active enZyme (CAZy) database (47) 2).However, they all display a different substrate specificity (49)(50)(51)(52)(53), compared to InvA.Although sucrases, which are widespread in animals, are able to hydrolyze sucrose, they also recognize some longer α1,2-linked oligosaccharides and cleavage α1,4-glycosidic bonds of terminal starch or glycogen digestion products (49,50).Remarkably, a Xanthomonas axonopodis sucrase termed SUH that belongs to GH13 family has been shown to catalyze only sucrose among a limited list of selected sugars (54).However, SUH has a different catalytic domain of (β/α) 8 barrel and a much longer substrate-binding pocket which could accommodate a oligosaccharide substrate much longer than the sucrose (55).Together, InvA and homologous A/N-Invs represent a novel family of glucosidases, which only specifically catalyze the cleavage of α1,2-glycosidic bond of sucrose.
In summary, we have solved the first structure of A/N-Invs, which are distinct from Ac-Invs.Identification of the catalytic residues enabled us to demonstrate that InvA possesses a stringent substrate specificity towards sucrose.These findings not only clarify the classification of A/N-Invs, but also provide clues to further investigation of sucrose metabolism in cyanobacteria and plants.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cloning, expression and purification-The gene of InvA (NCBI accession number WP_010995690.1,468 residues) was amplified from the genomic DNA of Anabaena sp.PCC 7120.The full-length invA and mutants were cloned into a modified pET28a vector with an N-terminal His 6 -tag.Likewise, the truncated InvA covering residues Lys9-Thr460 was constructed for crystallization.Both the wild-type and mutant proteins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3) (Novagen).The bacteria were grown in LB culture medium (10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, and 10 g NaCl per liter) containing 30 μg/ml kanamycin at 37°C to the OD 600nm of 0.6.Then protein expression was induced with 0.2 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside at 37°C for 4 hr.Cells were collected and resuspended in the lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl).After 12 min of sonication and centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 25 min, the supernatant containing the target protein was loaded onto a Ni-NTA column (Qiagen) equilibrated with the binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl).The target protein was eluted with 300 mM imidazole, and further loaded onto a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with the binding buffer.Fractions containing the target protein were combined and concentrated to 5-10 mg/ml for crystallization.Samples for enzymatic activity assays were collected at the highest peak fractions without concentration, and stored at -80°C with 50% glycerol.The purity of protein was assessed by gel electrophoresis.
SeMet-substituted full-length and truncated InvA were overexpressed in E. coli B834 (DE3) (Novagen).Transformed cells were first cultured in LB medium at 37°C overnight, then harvested and washed twice with the M9 medium (56).Then the cells were cultured in SeMet medium (M9 medium with 50 mg/l SeMet and other essential amino acids at 50 mg/l) to an OD 600 nm of 0.6-0.8.The following steps in protein expression and purification were the same as those for the native protein, in addition to adding 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol during purification.
Crystallization, data collection and processing-Crystals were grown using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method, with a drop of 1 or 2 μl protein solution mixed with an equal volume of reservoir solution.Microseeding was adopted in crystal optimization.Crystals of the full-length InvA were grown at 14°C, whereas crystals of the truncated version were first grown at 14°C for 2 days, and then transferred to 25°C for about one week.Crystals were obtained against the reservoir solution of 27% polyethylene glycol 6000, 0.1 M Bicine, pH 9.0 for the native and SeMet-substituted full-length protein; 1.5 M Li 2 SO 4 and 0.1 M Tris, pH 8.5 for the SeMet-substituted truncated InvA.In addition, protein solution of the SeMet-substituted truncated InvA was incubated with 200 mM fructose before crystallization.Crystals were transferred to cryoprotectant (reservoir solution supplemented with 30% glycerol) and flash-cooled with liquid nitrogen.
For soaking experiments, the fructose-complexed crystals were transferred to 2 μl mother liquor containing 30% saturated sucrose (~1.8 M) and glucose (~1.5 M), respectively.Fructose might be competitively dissociated during soaking with sucrose or glucose.After 5 min, crystals soaking with sucrose were flash-cooled directly, with sucrose as the cryoprotectant, whereas 30% glycerol was used as the cryoprotectant for the glucose soaked crystals.
X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K in a liquid nitrogen stream, using beamline BL17U with an ADSC Q315r CCD detector and beamline BL18U with a DECTRIS PILATUS 6M PIXEL detector at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF).All diffraction data were integrated and scaled with the program HKL2000 (57).
Structure determination and refinement-The crystal structure of SeMet-substituted InvA in complex with fructose was determined by the single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) method (58) using the anomalous signal of Se.The AutoSol program of PHENIX ( 59) was used to search the heavy atoms, and calculate the phase.In total 35 Se sites were identified among all 39 sites in the asymmetric unit.Then automatic model building was carried out using Autobuild in PHENIX.The resultant model contains 1260 residues (93% completeness) with R work and R free values of 0.195 and 0.222, respectively.The initial model was refined using the maximum likelihood method implemented in REFMAC5 (60) of CCP4i program suite (61) and rebuilt interactively using the program COOT (62).The InvA-Fru structure was used as the search model against the crystal data of full-length InvA by molecular replacement using Molrep program (63) in CCP4i.The InvA-Suc and InvA-Glc data were refined against the InvA-Fru structure.Subsequent refinements were performed by REFMAC5 program in CCP4i, phenix.refineprogram (64) in PHENIX and COOT.NCS restraints were used during refinements of the full-length InvA and InvA-Glc structures, which have modest resolutions.The final model was evaluated with the web service MolProbity (http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu)(65).Crystallographic parameters were listed in Table 1.The simulated annealing |F o |−|F c | difference maps of different ligands contoured at 3.0 σ were calculated by PHENIX.The oligomeric state and interface areas were calculated by PDBePISA (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/pisa/).All structure figures were prepared with PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org).
Enzymatic assays-The pH dependence of invertase activity of recombinant InvA was assayed in 40 mM MES (pH 5.5-6.5),HEPES (pH 7.0-8.0),Bicine (pH 8.5-9.0) and glycine-NaOH (pH 9.5) buffer containing 100 mM NaCl.Subsequent enzymatic assays were carried out at pH 7.9.A 50 μl reaction mixture containing 100 mM sucrose and 50 nM wild-type enzyme or the mutants was incubated at 30°C for different time courses.Then the reactions were stopped by heating at 95°C for 10 min.After centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was diluted tenfold and analyzed by HPLC system (Agilent 1200 Series) coupled with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD, Alltech 2000ES).An acetonitrile/water (70:30, v/v) solution was used as the mobile phase at 1 ml/min.The samples were injected in volumes of 10 μl onto Prevail™ Carbohydrate ES column (4.6×250 mm, 5 µm, GRACE) and the column temperature was kept at 25°C.For ELSD, the temperature of the nebulizer was set to 85°C, and the gas flow was 2.5 L/min.The glucose standards were used to construct the calibration curve for quantification each time.The kinetic determinations of wild-type InvA were performed at different sucrose concentrations, and the K m and k cat values were calculated by nonlinear fitting to the Michaelis Menten equation using the program Origin 8.The n H value was calculated by the Hill equation.For substrate specificity analysis, we tested the activities against 100 mM sucrose, maltose, trehalose, melezitose, cellobiose, raffinose and lactose for 2 hr.All assays were performed in three independent experiments to calculate the means and standard deviations.
Sequence and structural comparisons-The sequence of InvA was used in the BLAST search against the non-redundant protein sequences database.Several A/N-Inv homologues were input to multiple-sequence alignment using the program MultAlin (66) and visualized by ESPript 3.0 (67).The DALI server (26) was used to search the homologous structures.The structures of tGA and YgjK which have a high structural similarity were superimposed against InvA using the Superpose program (68)

FIGURE 1 .
FIGURE 1. Overall structure of InvA.(A) Hexameric structure.Helices are shown as cylinders; sucrose and fructose in the active site are shown as palecyan and blue sticks, respectively.Two subunits in each dimer are colored in green and yellow, respectively.The six subunits are sequentially labeled as A-F.(B) Molecular mass determination of InvA by analytical gel filtration chromatography.(C) Dimeric structure.A dimer of subunits A and F is shown.(D) A close view of InvA monomer.Subunit A in InvA-Suc is used as an example.The core (α/α) 6 -barrel is shown in green and the insertion is colored in purple.The sucrose molecule is shown in sticks.(E) Superposition of InvA against the catalytic domain of tGA, which is shown in gray.(F) Superposition of truncated InvA (InvA-Suc) against the full-length structure.InvA-Suc and the full-length structure are shown in green and wheat, respectively.A loop at the C-terminus of the full-length structure is highlighted in hotpink.

FIGURE 2 .
FIGURE 2. The substrate-binding pocket of InvA.The small molecules binding to the pocket of (A) subunit A, (B) subunit C and (C) subunit B of the sucrose-complexed structure InvA-Suc.(D) A fructose binding to the subsite +1 in the fructose-complexed structure InvA-Fru.(E) A glucose at the subsite −1 in the glucose-complexed structure InvA-Glc.(F) A glycerol at the subsite −1 in the full-length structure of InvA.The involved residues are shown in green sticks, the ligands are shown as sticks in different colors and the water molecules are shown as red spheres.The polar interactions are indicated by dashed lines.The simulated annealing |F o |−|F c | difference electron density maps of ligands contoured at 3.0 σ are shown as blue mesh.

FIGURE 3 .
FIGURE 3. The optimum pH of InvA.Invertase activity was measured against 100 mM sucrose at pH 5.5-9.5.Three independent experiments were performed, and the standard deviations of the mean were shown as error bars.

FIGURE 4 .
FIGURE 4. Catalytic residues of InvA.(A) Superposition of the active sites of InvA, tGA and YgjK.The corresponding secondary elements and residues of InvA, tGA and YgjK are shown in green, gray and purple, respectively.The catalytic water molecule is displayed as a sphere in corresponding color.(B) The relative activity of the three mutants compared to the wild-type InvA.The error bars represent standard deviations from three independent assays.

FIGURE 5 .
FIGURE 5. A putative catalytic mechanism of InvA.Residues Asp188 and Glu414 are proposed to be the catalytic acid and base, respectively.Wat1 is the presumed nucleophilic water molecule.

FIGURE 6 .FIGURE 7 .
FIGURE 6.The substrate specificity of InvA.HPLC analysis of the hydrolytic activity of InvA towards 100 mM various sugars.The upper panel is the standard sample of glucose and fructose.The formulas of tested sugars are shown on the right of corresponding profiles.

TABLE 1 .
of CCP4i program suite.Crystal parameters, data collection, and structure refinement R merge = ∑ hkl ∑ i |I i (hkl) − <I(hkl)>|/∑ hkl ∑ i I i (hkl), where I i (hkl) is the intensity of an observation and <I(hkl)> is the mean value for its unique reflection.Summations are over all reflections.bRwork = ∑ h |F o (h)-F c (h)|/∑ h F o (h), where F o and F c are the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively.c R free was calculated with 5% of the data excluded from the refinement.
a d RMSD, root mean square deviation from ideal values.eThe categories were defined by Molprobity.fThe number of serious steric overlaps (> 0.4 Å) per 1000 atoms.gMolProbity score combines the clashscore, rotamer, and Ramachandran evaluations into a single score, normalized to be on the same scale as X-ray resolution.hThe values in parentheses refer to statistics in the highest bin.