A new modification for mammalian messenger RNA

The discovery of multiple RNA modifications in the past few years has broadened our views of the structures and potential functions of RNA species, but deciphering which modifications are made where and how remains a challenge. A new study by Xu et al. applies a combination of mass spectrometry, biochemistry, genetics, and cellular biology tools to reveal the two mammalian methyltransferases that are responsible for m3C installation in tRNA and a third that mediates the previously unknown installation of m3C in mammalian mRNA.

The discovery of multiple RNA modifications in the past few years has broadened our views of the structures and potential functions of RNA species, but deciphering which modifications are made where and how remains a challenge. A new study by Xu et al. applies a combination of mass spectrometry, biochemistry, genetics, and cellular biology tools to reveal the two mammalian methyltransferases that are responsible for m 3

C installation in tRNA and a third that mediates the previously unknown installation of m 3 C in mammalian mRNA.
Unlike genomic DNA, which tends to have a limited number of chemical modifications, RNA species can have many more types of modifications: To date, Ͼ100 different RNA modifications have been identified that encompass a wide variety of chemical diversity. Early studies on the abundant RNAs such as rRNA, snRNA, and tRNA demonstrated that this diversity of modifications leads to additional cellular functions for different RNA species (1). For example, rRNA modifications affect translation accuracy and efficiency and likely facilitate ribosome biogenesis. The studies of these modifications, particularly in the context of mRNA and lncRNA, embody the new concept of "epitranscriptomics," in which the functional significance of chemical alterations is controlled by three groups of proteins: "writers" to install, "erasers" to remove, and "readers" to recognize modifications and thus determine the cellular fate of the modified RNA species. Xu et al. (2) now report the characterization of three "writers" in the form of mammalian methyltransferases anticipated to introduce N 3 -methylcytosine (m 3 C) 2 modifications. Their data show that two of the enzymes act on tRNA as suspected, whereas the third surprisingly uses mRNA as a substrate, defining a new modification for this RNA species in mammals.
Efforts in epitranscriptomics are aided by the fact that many RNA modifications are conserved across most eukaryotes. For example, the conserved m 3 C modification in tRNA (3)(4)(5)(6), the most heavily modified type of RNA, is installed in yeast by the methyltransferase Trm140 or the complex of Trm140 and Trm141 (7)(8)(9). m 3 C has been identified in tRNA and plant mRNA (10) but has not been reported in mammalian mRNA. However, N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A), pseudouridine (⌿), 5-methylcytosine (m 5 C), N 1 -methyladenosine (m 1 A), and 2ЈO-methylation were previously shown to be present in mRNA (1) and may play versatile roles in mRNA processing and impact mRNA fates. For instance, m 6 A, the most abundant mRNA modification, appears to affect almost every phase of mRNA metabolism and function, thereby impacting diverse biological processes. Known modification enzymes that install ⌿ and m 5 C in mRNA, PUS1/PUS7 and NSUN2, can also install the same modifications on tRNAs, suggesting that certain tRNA/rRNA modification enzymes could also act on mRNA.
The study by Fu and colleagues (2) begins with three mammalian methyltransferases: the two homologs of yeast Trm140 and Trm141 (METTL2 and METTL6) and another enzyme that also possesses a methyltransferase domain (METTL8). The authors knocked out Mettl2, Mettl6, and Mettl8 in mice and in human cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9. Using liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), they quantified m 3 C in tRNA fractions in brain and liver tissues from wild-type mice and Mettl2, Mettl6, and Mettl8 knockout (KO) mutants. The results showed that Mettl2 and Mettl6 KO led to a 35 and 12% reduction in m 3 C levels in tRNA, respectively. These observations were further confirmed in Mettl2A and Mettl2B KO HEK293T cells. Furthermore, the authors defined the location of the METTL2-dependent m 3 C in specific tRNAs by using primer extension assays: tRNA Thr(UGU) and tRNA Arg(CCU) extracted from wild-type mice generated RNA bands consistent with blockage of the reverse transcriptase at the expected position 32 of the tRNA. The blockage was significantly reduced in the tRNA extracted from Mettl2 KO mice. Reconstitution of METTL2B restored the polymerase-blocking modification in Mettl2 KO cells. The authors further identified two serine-specific tRNAs as substrates for METTL6, and followed up on a recent discovery in yeast suggesting that an interaction with the seryl-tRNA synthase might stimulate methyltransferase activity. In human cell lines, the authors observed that METTL6 interacts with seryl-tRNA synthase in an RNAdependent manner, with the association blocked by mutation of the SAM-binding domain of METTL6 or upon RNase treatment.
In contrast to these results, METTL8 deficiency did not produce a significant change in tRNA m 3 C levels. Instead, Xu et al.
(2) provide definitive proof through stringent purification of mRNA and quantification by LC-MS/MS that METTL8 acts on mRNA, functionally annotating this enzyme and defining m 3 C as a modification in mRNA for the first time in mammalian systems. Specifically, tRNA was first removed from the total RNA sample by size-exclusion chromatography. The rest of the RNA fraction was subsequently subjected to poly(A) enrich- The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chuanhe@uchicago.edu. 2 The abbreviations used are: m 3 C, N 3 -methylcytosine; m 6 A, N 6 -methyladenosine; m 5 C, 5-methylcytosine; m 1 A, N 1 -methyladenosine; ⌿, pseudouridine. The work by Fu and colleagues (6) provides several immediate angles to explore. Initial primer extension assays suggested METTL6 acts near position 32 of the two serine-specific tRNAs, but further data will be needed to determine the specific substrate nucleotide. Similarly, the locations of the METTL8installed modifications remain unknown. Furthermore, the functional roles of these enzymes and the m 3 C modifications and whether these vary under different stress conditions or during cellular signaling remain to be elucidated.
Identifying and deciphering the roles of RNA modifications is more than just a biochemical treasure hunt: Defects of certain RNA-modifying enzymes are known to be associated with human diseases. Moving beyond the abundant RNAs to RNA species such as mRNA and long noncoding RNA, coupled with the discoveries of chemical modifications such as m 6 A, m 1 A, m 5 C, ⌿, 2ЈO, and now m 3 C methylations, is opening new directions in understanding RNA modification-mediated RNA processing and gene expression regulation. For example, the m 3 C, m 7 G, and m 1 A modifications introduce a positive charge to their RNA strand (Fig. 1), the presence of which could lead to enhanced protein-RNA interactions, secondary structure changes, and impacts on translation. The explosive discoveries of regulatory RNAs in the past decade have changed our views on the diverse functions possible for RNA species; overlaying our burgeoning knowledge of RNA modifications makes this a very exciting time indeed for the RNA field.