Advertisement
Enzymology| Volume 271, ISSUE 21, P12511-12516, May 24, 1996

Cathepsin K, but Not Cathepsins B, L, or S, Is Abundantly Expressed in Human Osteoclasts (∗)

Open AccessPublished:May 24, 1996DOI:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.21.12511
      Random high throughput sequencing of a human osteoclast cDNA library was employed to identify novel osteoclast-expressed genes. Of the 5475 ESTs obtained, approximately 4% encoded cathepsin K, a novel cysteine protease homologous to cathepsins S and L; ESTs for other cathepsins were rare. In addition, ESTs for cathepsin K were absent or at low frequency in cDNA libraries from numerous other tissues and cells. In situ hybridization in osteoclastoma and osteophyte confirmed that cathepsin K mRNA was highly expressed selectively in osteoclasts; cathepsins S, L, and B were not detectable. Cathepsin K was not detected by in situ hybridization in a panel of other tissues. Western blot of human osteoclastoma or fetal rat humerus demonstrated bands of 38 and 27 kDa, consistent with sizes predicted for pro- and mature cathepsin K. Immunolocalization in osteoclastoma and osteophyte showed intense punctate staining of cathepsin K exclusively in osteoclasts, with a polar distribution that was more intense at the bone surface. The abundant expression of cathepsin K selectively in osteoclasts strongly suggests that it plays a specialized role in bone resorption. Furthermore, the data suggest that random sequencing of ESTs from cDNA libraries is a valuable approach for identifying novel cell-selective genes.

      INTRODUCTION

      Bone is composed of a protein matrix in which spindle- or plate-shaped crystals of hydroxyapatite are incorporated(
      • Baron R.
      ). The matrix is approximately 90% Type I collagen, but also contains a number of non-collagenous proteins such as osteocalcin, osteopontin, and bone sialoprotein. It has been recognized for many years that bone resorption requires both dissolution of the inorganic mineral component (acidic microenvironment) and degradation of the protein matrix (protease activity). This has led to extensive efforts to identify the protease(s) responsible for osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. However, since osteoclasts are very rare cells and no appropriate osteoclast cell model has been identified, standard biochemical approaches for identification of the protease(s) have proven to be very difficult.
      A number of studies have suggested that a cysteine protease(s) is involved in bone resorption. For example, several known cathepsins have collagenolytic activity under acidic conditions(
      • Maciewicz R.A.
      • Etherington D.J.
      ), a property that is predicted to be required for the enzyme(s) secreted from the osteoclast into the acidic resorption lacunae. In addition, classical inhibitors of cysteine proteases, such as leupeptin, Z-Phe-Ala-CHN2, E-64, and cystatin, have demonstrated activity at preventing osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in in vitro models(
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      ,
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      ,
      • Delaisse J.M.
      • Boyde A.
      • Maconnachie E.
      • Ali N.N.
      • Sear C.H.J.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      • Jones S.J.
      ,
      • Hill P.A.
      • Buttle D.J.
      • Jones S.J.
      • Boyde A.
      • Murata M.
      • Reynolds J.J.
      • Meikle M.C.
      ,
      • Lerner U.H.
      • Grubb A.
      ,
      • Everts V.
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Korper W.
      • Niehof A.
      • Vaes G.
      • Beertsen W.
      ). Z-Phe-Ala-CHN2 and leupeptin have also shown activity in vivo in a murine hypercalcemia model of bone resorption(
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      ). Based upon observed substrate and inhibitor preferences, as well as immunological reactivity, several groups have suggested that cathepsins B or L, or a closely related enzyme, are likely to be responsible for osteoclast-mediated resorption (
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Ledent P.
      • Vaes G.
      ,
      • Page A.E.
      • Warburton M.J.
      • Chambers T.J.
      • Pringle J.A.S.
      • Hayman A.R.
      ,
      • Goto T.
      • Kiyoshima T.
      • Moroi R.
      • Tsukuba T.
      • Nishimura Y.
      • Himeno M.
      • Yamamoto K.
      • Tanaka T.
      ,
      • Goto T.
      • Tsukuba T.
      • Ayasaka N.
      • Yamamoto K.
      • Tanaka T.
      ,
      • Ohsawa Y.
      • Nitatori T.
      • Higuchi S.
      • Kominami E.
      • Uchiyama Y.
      ,
      • Goto T.
      • Tsukuba T.
      • Kiyoshima T.
      • Nishimura Y.
      • Kato K.
      • Yamamoto K.
      • Tanaka T.
      ,
      • Sasaki T.
      • Ueno-Matsuda E.
      ,
      • Sannes P.L.
      • Schofield B.H.
      • McDonald D.F.
      ,
      • van Noorden C.J.F.
      • Vogels I.M.C.
      • Smith R.E.
      ,
      • Kakegawa H.
      • Nikawa T.
      • Tagami K.
      • Kamioka H.
      • Sumitani K.
      • Kawata T.
      • Drobnic-Kosorok M.
      • Lenarcic B.
      • Turk V.
      • Katunuma N.
      ,
      • Rifkin B.R.
      • Vernillo A.T.
      • Kleckner A.P.
      • Auszmann J.M.
      • Rosenberg L.R.
      • Zimmerman M.
      ,
      • Tagami K.
      • Kakegawa H.
      • Kamioka H.
      • Sumitani K.
      • Kawata T.
      • Lenarcic B.
      • Turk V.
      • Kutanuma N.
      ,
      • Kremer M.
      • Judd J.
      • Rifkin B.
      • Auszmann J.
      • Oursler M.J.
      ).
      Recently a novel member of the papain family of cysteine proteases has been cloned that is most homologous to cathepsins S and L(
      • Tezuka K.
      • Tezuka Y.
      • Maejima A.
      • Sato T.
      • Nemoto K.
      • Kamioka H.
      • Hakeda Y.
      • Kumegawa M.
      ,
      • Shi G.-P.
      • Chapman H.A.
      • Bhairi S.M.
      • DeLeeuw C.
      • Reddy V.Y.
      • Weiss S.J.
      ,
      • Bromme D.
      • Okamoto K.
      ,
      • Drake F.
      • James I.
      • Connor J.
      • Rieman D.
      • Dodds R.
      • McCabe F.
      • Bertolini D.
      • Barthlow R.
      • Hastings G.
      • Gowen M.
      ,
      • Li Y.P.
      • Alexander M.B.
      • Wucherpfennis A.L.
      • Chen W.
      • Yelick P.
      • Stashenko P.
      ,
      • Inaoka T.
      • Bilbe G.
      • Ishibashi O.
      • Tezuka K.
      • Kumegawa M.
      • Kokubo T.
      ). Clones for this enzyme were first identified in cDNA libraries of rabbit (
      • Tezuka K.
      • Tezuka Y.
      • Maejima A.
      • Sato T.
      • Nemoto K.
      • Kamioka H.
      • Hakeda Y.
      • Kumegawa M.
      ) and human (
      • Drake F.
      • James I.
      • Connor J.
      • Rieman D.
      • Dodds R.
      • McCabe F.
      • Bertolini D.
      • Barthlow R.
      • Hastings G.
      • Gowen M.
      ,
      • Inaoka T.
      • Bilbe G.
      • Ishibashi O.
      • Tezuka K.
      • Kumegawa M.
      • Kokubo T.
      ) osteoclasts, suggesting that it was selectively expressed in osteoclasts. This novel cathepsin has been referred to as OC2 (
      • Tezuka K.
      • Tezuka Y.
      • Maejima A.
      • Sato T.
      • Nemoto K.
      • Kamioka H.
      • Hakeda Y.
      • Kumegawa M.
      ) or cathepsins O(
      • Shi G.-P.
      • Chapman H.A.
      • Bhairi S.M.
      • DeLeeuw C.
      • Reddy V.Y.
      • Weiss S.J.
      ), K(
      • Inaoka T.
      • Bilbe G.
      • Ishibashi O.
      • Tezuka K.
      • Kumegawa M.
      • Kokubo T.
      ), X(
      • Li Y.P.
      • Alexander M.B.
      • Wucherpfennis A.L.
      • Chen W.
      • Yelick P.
      • Stashenko P.
      ), or O2 (
      • Bromme D.
      • Okamoto K.
      ); we refer to it as cathepsin K. (
      The Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology has assigned the name cathepsin K (EC 3.4.22.38) to the protease described in this paper.
      ) The approach that we used to identify cathepsin K was to partially sequence large numbers of randomly chosen clones from an osteoclast cDNA library(
      • Drake F.
      • James I.
      • Connor J.
      • Rieman D.
      • Dodds R.
      • McCabe F.
      • Bertolini D.
      • Barthlow R.
      • Hastings G.
      • Gowen M.
      ). By comparing homology to known sequences, the expressed sequence tags (ESTs) (
      The abbreviations used are: EST
      expressed sequence tag
      TESPA
      3-aminopropyltriethoxy silane
      PAGE
      polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
      ) obtained from this technique provide a valuable approach for identification of novel expressed genes(
      • Adams M.D.
      • Kelley J.M.
      • Gocayne J.D.
      • Dubnick M.
      • Polymeropoulos M.H.
      • Xiao H.
      • Merril C.R.
      • Wu A.
      • Olde B.
      • Moreno R.F.
      • Kerlavage A.R.
      • McCombie W.R.
      • Venter J.C.
      ,
      • Adams M.D.
      • Dubnick M.
      • Kerlavage A.R.
      • Moreno R.
      • Kelley J.M.
      • Utterback T.R.
      • Nagle J.W.
      • Fields C.
      • Venter J.C.
      ,
      • Adams M.D.
      • et al.
      ).
      In the present study, cellular expression of cathepsin K was examined by in situ hybridization in multiple tissues and compared with expression of cathepsins S, B, and L. In addition, specific anti-cathepsin K antibodies were generated and used to demonstrate expression and cellular localization of cathepsin K protein. The data clearly show that cathepsin K is abundantly and selectively expressed in osteoclasts, and that it displays a cellular localization consistent with an involvement of the enzyme in bone resorption. Furthermore, the data indicate that cathepsins S, B, and L, which had been proposed to be involved in bone resorption, are either expressed at very low levels or are absent in osteoclasts.

      MATERIALS AND METHODS

      Osteoclast cDNA Library

      Fresh osteoclastoma tissue was chopped into small pieces and placed into a sterile 50-ml centrifuge tube. The pieces were disaggregated by incubating at 37°C for 30 min in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.), supplemented with 3 mg/ml (w/v) type I collagenase (Sigma). A cell suspension was obtained by gently homogenizing the remaining tissue with a plunger from a 30-ml syringe. The osteoclastoma-derived cells were pelleted by centrifugation (400 × g for 10 min) and resuspended in 6 ml of cold culture medium (RPMI with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin; Life Technologies, Inc.) to which was added 3 ml of the anti-β3 antibody, C22. Following a 30-min incubation on ice, the cells were washed twice by centrifugation in cold RPMI medium. After the last wash, the cells were resuspended in 10 ml of medium and were enumerated in a hemocytometer. Dynabeads (Dynal Inc., Great Neck, NY). coated with goat anti-mouse IgG were incubated for 30 min on ice with the cell suspension at a density of 6 beads/osteoclast. The bead-coated osteoclasts were immobilized on a magnet, and the uncoated cells were removed by extensive washing with cold RPMI medium. The osteoclast-rich suspension was then resuspended in fresh RPMI medium and seeded into eight T250 tissue culture flasks. The cells were cultured for 3 days prior to the extraction of mRNA using the Invitrogen FastTrack mRNA Isolation kit. The mRNA was methylmercuric hydroxide denatured prior to cDNA synthesis, and a directional oligo(dT)-primed cDNA library was prepared (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). cDNA was size fractionated, and fragments greater than 1 kilobase were ligated into the Uni-ZAP XR vector.

      In Situ Hybridization

      Cryostat sections of osteophytes and osteoclastoma tissue were processed as described previously(
      • Dodds R.A.
      • Gowen M.
      • Bradbeer J.N.
      ). The sections were picked off onto 3-aminopropyltriethoxy silane (TESPA)-coated glass slides. A cDNA clone (pBluescript SK) containing the coding region of human cathepsin K was obtained from the osteoclast library. Clones for cathepsins B, S, and L were obtained from stromal cell, pancreatic tumor, and human embryo cDNA libraries, respectively. cDNA templates were linearized and then transcribed from the T3 or the T7 promoter to generate sense and antisense probes, respectively. Riboprobes were prepared using the Promega (Madison, WI) In Vitro transcription kit with [35S]thio-CTP (Amersham Corp.). Following transcription, cDNA templates were digested with RQ1 RNase-free DNase I (Promega), and unincorporated nucleotides were removed by centrifugation through Quick Spin Sephadex G-50 columns (Boehringer Mannheim). RNA transcripts with a specific activity in excess of 108 cpm/mg were used for hybridization.
      In situ hybridization was performed by a modification of the method of Zeller and Rogers(
      • Zeller R.
      • Rogers M.
      ), as follows. Cryosections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min, washed, dehydrated, and frozen at −20°C. Prior to hybridization sections were rehydrated in phosphate-buffered saline containing 2 mg/ml glycine and rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline. Demineralization was in 0.2 N HCl for 20 min, followed by acetylation in 0.25% acetic anhydride, 0.1 M triethanolamine. Finally, sections were washed twice in 2 × SSC (20 × SSC: 3 M NaCl, 0.3 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), dehydrated in 30, 60, 80, 95, and 100% ethanol, and air-dried. Sections were used immediately for hybridization in buffer consisting of 2 parts hybridization mix B (1.2 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 4 mM EDTA, 2 × Denhardt's solution, 1 mg/ml yeast tRNA, 200 μg/ml poly(A)) (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.), 2 parts deionized formamide, and 1 part 50% dextran sulfate. Dithiothreitol was added to a final concentration of 50 mM, and probe concentration was 2 × 105 cpm/μl. Hybridization was carried out at 42°C for 4 h in a well sealed moist chamber. Post-hybridization washes were as follows: at least twice in prewarmed 2 × SSC, 50% formamide, 0.1%β-mercaptoethanol for 15 min at 50°C; once in 20 μg/ml boiled ribonuclease A in 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, for 30 min at 37°C; at least twice in prewarmed 2 × SSC, 50% formamide, 0.1%β-mercaptoethanol for 15 min at 50°C; twice in prewarmed 0.1 × SSC, 1%β-mercaptoethanol for 15 min at 50°C. Sections were dehydrated in the following: 0.6 M NaCl, 30% ethanol; 0.6 M NaCl, 60% ethanol; 80%, 95%, and 100% ethanol for 2 min each. Air-dried slides were coated in Amersham LM-1 emulsion and exposed at 4°C for 2 weeks. The slides were developed in a Kodak developer and counterstained with methylene blue. The extent of the hybridization signal was assessed by the autoradiographic grain density over the cell.

      Antibodies

      For anti-peptide antibodies, rabbits were immunized with a synthetic peptide corresponding to a sequence in cathepsin K that has low sequence identity to other known cathepsins. Antibody C2 was generated to a peptide corresponding to amino acids 248-260 of preprocathepsin K (AIDASLTSFQFYS). The antibody was affinity-purified by chromatography on immobilized peptide antigen. For anti-protein antibodies (SR-1), a rabbit was immunized with full-length preprocathepsin K that had been overproduced in Escherichia coli, and purified by preparative SDS-PAGE.

      Western Blot

      Extracts of osteoclastoma were prepared by rapid lysis in hot (60°C) 2% SDS. Fetal rat humerus was Dounce homogenized, followed by lysis in hot 2% SDS. Samples were run on SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose. Blots were probed with anti-cathepsin K antisera (or affinity-purified antibodies), followed by goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to alkaline phosphatase.

      Immunocytochemistry

      Curettage samples of osteoclastoma tissue were fixed overnight in 10% buffered formalin (Baxter Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL) and then washed in 70% ethanol. The tissue was processed for paraffin embedding using a Shandon Citadel 1000 tissue processor, and embedded in paraffin wax using a Shandon embedding center (Pittsburgh, PA). The tissue blocks were cut, using a Reichert Histostat rotary microtome (Warner Lambert Instruments, Buffalo, NY), and the 7-μm sections were placed onto TESPA-coated glass slides. The sections were dried overnight at 37°C and were then dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated into 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The sections were then boiled for 15-30 min in the citrate buffer by microwaving them at high power in a household microwave oven (General Electric, Louisville, KY); the buffer was periodically topped up to prevent the tissue from drying out. After cooling slides to room temperature, the sections were overlaid with either the rabbit polyclonal cathepsin-K reactive primary antibodies, or with nonimmune serum controls, and a standard avidin/biotin alkaline phosphatase method was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (DAKO, Carpenteria, CA). Positive reactivity was detected using a post-coupling naphthol phosphate method with Fast Red-TR (Sigma) as the coupler; a red precipitate indicated positive reactivity.
      Alternatively, cryostat sections were used to demonstrate the reactivity of the anti-cathepsin K antibodies. Sections (8 μm) of human tissues were cut using a Bright's cryostat (Bright Instrument Co., Huntingdon, United Kingdom) equipped with a tungsten-tipped steel knife (ARP, Cheshire, United Kingdom). The sections (undecalcified adult osteophytic bone and rheumatoid synovium from osteoarthritic and rheumatoid femoral heads, respectively; post-mortem specimens of human kidney, spleen, liver, lung, heart, skin, and colon) were placed onto TESPA-coated slides and air-dried for at least 15 min. Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin for 10 min and then washed in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) immediately before boiling them in the citrate buffer for 15 min in the microwave. The remainder of the technique was performed as outlined above.

      RESULTS

      Cathepsin EST Frequency

      Cathepsin K was identified as a novel cysteine protease whose ESTs were highly abundant in an osteoclast library from human osteoclastoma(
      • Drake F.
      • James I.
      • Connor J.
      • Rieman D.
      • Dodds R.
      • McCabe F.
      • Bertolini D.
      • Barthlow R.
      • Hastings G.
      • Gowen M.
      ). Approximately 4% of all ESTs randomly sequenced from this library encoded cathepsin K (223 ESTs of 5475 total). In contrast, ESTs for cathepsin K were absent in most other libraries sequenced. For cDNA libraries in which ESTs for cathepsin K were found, they were present at much lower frequency than in the osteoclast cDNA library. For example, in cDNA libraries for which greater than 1000 ESTs had been sequenced, the frequency of ESTs for cathepsin K was: placenta, 0.0016%; white adipose, 0.06%; retina, 0.06%; colon, 0.037%; epididymus, 0.09%; gall bladder, 0.03%; testes, 0.006%; tonsils, 0.009%; chondrosarcoma, 0.13%; ovarian cancer, 0.018%; B cell lymphoma, 0.015%; pancreatic tumor, 0.017%; prostate cancer, 0.087%, T-cell lymphoma, 0.036%; and activated monocytes, 0.044%. Thus, data from a number of libraries suggest that cathepsin K is abundant only in osteoclasts.
      In contrast to the abundance of ESTs for cathepsin K, ESTs for other cathepsins were rare in the osteoclast library. Only two ESTs (0.036%) for cathepsin B were identified from the osteoclast library, and one EST (0.018%) for cathepsin S was found. No ESTs for cathepsin L were found, and no other ESTs for cysteine proteases were represented in the library. Thus, ESTs for cathepsin K represented greater than 98% of the total cysteine protease ESTs in the human osteoclast cDNA library.

      Expression of Cathepsin K mRNA

      Northern blot analysis of osteoclastoma tissue with a specific probe for cathepsin K demonstrated a single band of approximately 2 kilobases (data not shown). To determine which cells expressed the enzyme, in situ hybridization studies were performed in human osteoclastoma and osteophyte. Cathepsin K was abundantly and selectively expressed in osteoclasts and a discrete population of mononuclear cells within human osteophyte and osteoclastoma tissue (Fig. 1, A and D). All other cell types, including stromal cells (of the osteoclastoma), marrow cells, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and chondrocytes, were negative. At sites of cartilage remodeling in the osteophyte, chondroclasts also expressed cathepsin K mRNA (not shown).
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1:In situ hybridization. Sections were hybridized to the probes indicated, followed by methylene blue counterstain (original magnification, × 20). A, cathepsin K antisense probe in a section of human osteoclastoma tissue. Osteoclasts (large arrowheads) and a small population of mononuclear cells (small arrowheads) demonstrated strong cathepsin K mRNA expression. B, serial section of A probed with the cathepsin K sense strand. C, cathepsin B mRNA expression in section of osteoclastoma. Osteoclasts (large arrowheads) did not demonstrate expression; however, associated mononuclear cells (small arrowheads) demonstrated strong cathepsin B mRNA expression. D, cathepsin K antisense probe in a section of human osteophyte. Osteoclasts resorbing or adjacent to bone (B) demonstrated selective and strong cathepsin K mRNA expression (arrowheads). E, serial section of D probed with the cathepsin K sense strand. F, cathepsin B antisense probe in a section of human osteophyte. Osteoclasts (large arrowheads) resorbing bone demonstrated no cathepsin B mRNA expression.
      To determine the expression of cathepsin K in other cell types, a panel of human tissues was tested by in situ hybridization. Cathepsin K mRNA was not detected in any of the tissues tested (Table 1).
      Tabled 1
      Table thumbnail fx11

      Expression of mRNA for Cathepsins S, L, and B

      The EST frequency suggested that cathepsins S, L, and B were expressed at a much lower frequency in osteoclasts than cathepsin K. To confirm this, in situ hybridization studies were performed on osteoclastoma and osteophyte sections with probes specific for these cathepsins. No hybridization was detected in osteoclasts in osteoclastoma or osteophyte with probes for cathepsins S, L, or B (cathepsin B shown as representative; Fig. 1, C and F; Table 2). As expected, cathepsins B and L were highly expressed in spleen, liver, and kidney (Table 2).
      Tabled 1
      Table thumbnail fx12

      Expression of Cathepsin K Protein

      Western blot analysis of osteoclastoma tissue with antibody against either synthetic peptides unique to cathepsin K (antibody C2) or to intact procathepsin K that had been expressed in E. coli (antibody SR1) demonstrated immunoreactive bands of 38 kDa and 27 kDa (Fig. 3, lane A), consistent with the predicted size of the pro- and mature cathepsin K, respectively. For the antipeptide antibody, addition of an excess of the peptide immunogen prevented the detection of these bands (Fig. 3, lane B); an excess of an unrelated peptide had no effect (data not shown). To determine if cathepsin K was expressed in normal tissue, fetal rat humerus was analyzed by Western blot, and a similar pattern of expression was observed (data not shown).
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Figure 3:Cathepsin K protein expression in osteoclastoma. Human osteoclastoma lysate was separated by SDS-PAGE (12%) and blotted onto nitrocellulose. The blot was probed with an antibody raised against a synthetic peptide from a unique region of the predicted amino acid sequence of human cathepsin K (antibody C-2). In lane A, immunoreactive bands of 38 and 27 kDa are observed. Lane B demonstrates that these immunoreactive bands can be competed with 3 μg/ml peptide antigen.
      Immunolocalization of cathepsin K using antibody SR1 in osteoclastoma tissue demonstrated abundant staining in osteoclasts and showed a punctate, granular distribution that was very often localized to a single pole of the osteoclasts (Fig. 2A, large arrowheads). A small population of mononuclear cells (potentially representing an osteoclast precursor population) also demonstrated reactivity (Fig. 2A, small arrowheads). Surrounding stromal cells were negative for cathepsin K. Immunolocalization with antibody C2 demonstrated similar results (data not shown). No staining could be detected in any cells on the nonimmune serum control slides (Fig. 2B).
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2:Immunolocalization of cathepsin K. Sections were probed with the antisera indicated, followed by labeled streptavidin-biotin and staining with Mayer's hematoxylin. A, osteoclasts (large arrowheads) and a minor population of mononuclear cells (small arrowheads) in osteoclastoma demonstrated strong staining with anti-cathepsin K antibody (SR1). In many of the multinucleated osteoclasts, the staining was polarized to one edge of the cytoplasm (asterisks). Original magnification, × 20. B, no reactivity was detected in a section of osteoclastoma probed with pre-immune serum. Original magnification, × 20. C, strong anti-cathepsin K antibody (SR1) staining was detected on osteoclasts apposed (large arrowheads) to and away from (arrowheads) the bone surface in a section human osteophytic bone. The staining was most intense at the apical surface of the majority of osteoclasts apposed to the bone surface. No reactivity was observed in osteoblasts, osteocytes and the majority of cells within the bone marrow space. Original magnification, ×10. D, higher magnification of C to highlight the polarized staining of SR1 in osteoclasts apposed to the bone surface (arrows). Original magnification, × 40.
      In osteophyte, a similar pattern of cathepsin K reactivity was detected in osteoclasts apposed to the surface of bone (Fig. 2, C and D). The osteoclasts showed a distinct polarity of staining that was more intense toward the apical surface of resorbing osteoclasts. Cathepsin K expression also appeared to be restricted to osteoclasts, since other bone marrow cells, chondrocytes, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and connective tissue cells did not demonstrate reactivity (Fig. 2, C and D; Table 1).
      In contrast to the immunoreactivity observed in osteoclasts, cathepsin K protein expression was not detected in the panel of other human tissues analyzed (Table 1).

      DISCUSSION

      Previous studies have consistently demonstrated that inhibitors of cysteine proteases are very effective at preventing osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, and have clearly implicated a cathepsin(s) as a key mediator of this process(
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      ,
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      ,
      • Delaisse J.M.
      • Boyde A.
      • Maconnachie E.
      • Ali N.N.
      • Sear C.H.J.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      • Jones S.J.
      ,
      • Hill P.A.
      • Buttle D.J.
      • Jones S.J.
      • Boyde A.
      • Murata M.
      • Reynolds J.J.
      • Meikle M.C.
      ,
      • Lerner U.H.
      • Grubb A.
      ). Delaisse et al.(
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      ) tested a series of protease inhibitors in a mouse bone organ culture system and found that inhibitors of cysteine proteases (e.g., leupeptin and Z-Phe-Ala-CHN2) reduced bone resorption, while serine protease inhibitors were ineffective. A follow-up study by the same group showed that E-64 and leupeptin were also effective at preventing bone resorption in vivo, as measured by acute changes in serum calcium in rats on calcium-deficient diets(
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      ). Based upon the activity of the enzyme, this group classified the enzyme responsible as cathepsin B. Cystatin, an endogenous cysteine protease inhibitor, was shown to prevent parathyroid hormone-stimulated bone resorption in mouse calvariae(
      • Lerner U.H.
      • Grubb A.
      ). Detailed studies demonstrated that the number and volume of resorption pits were decreased in the presence of cysteine protease inhibitors, while the surface area of the pits was unaffected(
      • Delaisse J.M.
      • Boyde A.
      • Maconnachie E.
      • Ali N.N.
      • Sear C.H.J.
      • Eeckhout Y.
      • Vaes G.
      • Jones S.J.
      ). Hill et al.(
      • Hill P.A.
      • Buttle D.J.
      • Jones S.J.
      • Boyde A.
      • Murata M.
      • Reynolds J.J.
      • Meikle M.C.
      ) confirmed these findings on resorption pit parameters and suggested that cathepsins B, L, or S were involved. Thus, data from several studies indicated that inhibitors of cysteine proteases were very effective at preventing bone resorption, and strongly suggested that a cysteine protease(s) plays an essential role in the process.
      In the present study, an enriched population of human osteoclasts was used to prepare a cDNA library that was subjected to high throughput random sequencing of clones. Among the genes identified was a novel cysteine protease that is highly related to cathepsins S and L (
      • Drake F.
      • James I.
      • Connor J.
      • Rieman D.
      • Dodds R.
      • McCabe F.
      • Bertolini D.
      • Barthlow R.
      • Hastings G.
      • Gowen M.
      ). A striking finding was the high frequency of ESTs for this enzyme in the osteoclast library and its relative lack of expression in other libraries, suggesting that this enzyme may be expressed selectively in osteoclasts. Surprisingly, ESTs for other cysteine proteases were nearly absent from the osteoclast library. To determine whether frequency of ESTs in the osteoclast library reflects expression levels in vivo, in situ hybridization studies on human tissues were performed. The results confirm that cathepsin K mRNA is highly abundant in osteoclasts and is not detectable in cells from other human tissues. These studies also confirmed that cathepsins S, B, and L are either absent or expressed at very low levels in osteoclasts.
      In addition, specific antibodies to cathepsin K were used to demonstrate for the first time expression of the protein. Western blotting showed expression of the enzyme in extracts of osteoclastoma as well as normal bone tissues, as demonstrated by immunoreactivity in fetal rat humerus. The mobility of cathepsin K on SDS-PAGE suggests that the enzyme is expressed as a 38-kDa proenzyme and that it is processed to a 27-kDa mature form (Fig. 3). Studies with purified cathepsin K have demonstrated that the 38-kDa proenzyme is inactive, and protease activity correlates with the appearance of the 27-kDa mature enzyme(
      • Bossard M.J.
      • Tomaszek T.A.
      • Thompson S.K.
      • Amegadzie B.Y.
      • Hanning C.R.
      • Jones C.
      • Kurdyla J.T.
      • McNulty D.E.
      • Drake F.H.
      • Gowen M.
      • Levy M.A.
      ). Immunohistochemistry confirmed the abundant expression of cathepsin K selectively in osteoclasts. Furthermore, the subcellular localization of cathepsin K at the osteoclast surface adjacent to the bone further supports a role of the enzyme in the bone resorption process. Thus, the abundant, selective expression of cathepsin K, coupled with the apparent lack of other cysteine proteases, strongly suggests that this enzyme plays a key role in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption.
      Although previous studies have shown remarkable agreement that a cathepsin(s) is involved in bone resorption, identification of the protease(s) has been a very difficult problem, since osteoclasts are very rare cells and no appropriate osteoclast cell model has been identified. These previous studies have attempted to identify the cathepsin involved in bone resorption by immunolocalization(
      • Goto T.
      • Kiyoshima T.
      • Moroi R.
      • Tsukuba T.
      • Nishimura Y.
      • Himeno M.
      • Yamamoto K.
      • Tanaka T.
      ,
      • Goto T.
      • Tsukuba T.
      • Ayasaka N.
      • Yamamoto K.
      • Tanaka T.
      ,
      • Ohsawa Y.
      • Nitatori T.
      • Higuchi S.
      • Kominami E.
      • Uchiyama Y.
      ,
      • Goto T.
      • Tsukuba T.
      • Kiyoshima T.
      • Nishimura Y.
      • Kato K.
      • Yamamoto K.
      • Tanaka T.
      ,
      • Sasaki T.
      • Ueno-Matsuda E.
      ,
      • van Noorden C.J.F.
      • Vogels I.M.C.
      • Smith R.E.
      ) or histochemically(
      • Sannes P.L.
      • Schofield B.H.
      • McDonald D.F.
      ,
      • Kakegawa H.
      • Nikawa T.
      • Tagami K.
      • Kamioka H.
      • Sumitani K.
      • Kawata T.
      • Drobnic-Kosorok M.
      • Lenarcic B.
      • Turk V.
      • Katunuma N.
      ,
      • Rifkin B.R.
      • Vernillo A.T.
      • Kleckner A.P.
      • Auszmann J.M.
      • Rosenberg L.R.
      • Zimmerman M.
      ). Contrary to our observations, these studies have suggested that cathepsins B and L are expressed by osteoclasts. However, the approaches taken in these studies necessarily relied on reagents for previously known cathepsins. Because cathepsin K is highly homologous to cathepsins L and B and is similar in size, cross-reactivity with cathepsin K by the antibodies used in earlier studies is possible. In addition, since cathepsin K may have similar enzymatic properties and substrate preferences as other cathepsins, interpretation of histochemical data is also difficult.
      Another approach that has been taken to identify the relevant protease(s) involved in bone resorption has been purification of protease activity. Delaisse (
      • Delaisse J.-M.
      • Ledent P.
      • Vaes G.
      ) purified protease activity from mouse calvariae and found three main peaks of activity, which they suggested were cathepsins B, L, and an unknown protease with an apparent mass of 70 kDa by gel chromatography. Page et al.(
      • Page A.E.
      • Warburton M.J.
      • Chambers T.J.
      • Pringle J.A.S.
      • Hayman A.R.
      ) used osteoclastoma tissue as an enriched source of osteoclasts for purification. They found six peaks of activity, each of which showed characteristics consistent with cathepsin B. As with the immunolocalization and histochemical studies, however, it is difficult to determine whether these protease activities may have been due to cathepsin K, or even an enzyme derived from cells other than osteoclasts.
      Tezuka et al.(
      • Tezuka K.
      • Tezuka Y.
      • Maejima A.
      • Sato T.
      • Nemoto K.
      • Kamioka H.
      • Hakeda Y.
      • Kumegawa M.
      ) cloned the rabbit homolog of cathepsin K, OC-2, from a rabbit osteoclast cDNA library. They demonstrated expression of OC-2 mRNA in the osteoclast by in situ hybridization of bone tissue. This group has also recently reported the sequence of the human enzyme(
      • Inaoka T.
      • Bilbe G.
      • Ishibashi O.
      • Tezuka K.
      • Kumegawa M.
      • Kokubo T.
      ). Li et al.(
      • Li Y.-P.
      • Alexander M.
      • Wucherpfennig A.L.
      • Yelick P.
      • Chen W.
      • Stashenko P.
      ) have also recently reported cloning of cathepsin K from an osteoclast cDNA library, and Bromme et al.(
      • Bromme D.
      • Okamoto K.
      ) cloned the gene from a human spleen library. Each group indicated that there was abundant expression in osteoclasts, although Bromme et al.(
      • Bromme D.
      • Okamoto K.
      ) also reported expression of cathepsin K mRNA in ovary. Shi et al.(
      • Shi G.-P.
      • Chapman H.A.
      • Bhairi S.M.
      • DeLeeuw C.
      • Reddy V.Y.
      • Weiss S.J.
      ) also cloned human cathepsin K, but from a human monocyte-derived macrophage library. They demonstrated proteolytic cleavage of fibrinogen when the enzyme was transiently transfected into COS cells. It is of interest that they were unable to detect cathepsin K from freshly isolated monocytes, suggesting that it was the extended culture conditions that led to induction of cathepsin K mRNA. Our inability to detect cathepsin K in rheumatoid synovium, which has high levels of macrophages, is consistent with the lack of expression of cathepsin K in macrophages under normal conditions.
      In addition to osteoclasts, our data indicate that cathepsin K was expressed in two other populations of cells. At sites of cartilage remodeling in osteophyte, chondroclasts expressed high levels of cathepsin K. This is not surprising, as these cells are related to or identical to osteoclasts. The data also indicate that cathepsin K is expressed in a population of mononuclear cells within the osteoclastoma tissue. Further characterization of this cell population has demonstrated that these cells possess a number of markers of the osteoclast phenotype, and are capable of forming resorption pits in vitro. (
      I. E. James, R. A. Dodds, E. Lee-Rykaczewski, C. F. Eichman, J. R. Connor, T. K. Hart, B. E. Maleeff, R. D. Lackman, and M. Gowen, submitted for publication.
      ) Thus, in addition to being highly expressed in mature osteoclasts, the enzyme may represent an excellent marker for the osteoclast precursor population as well.
      The ability to sequence large number of clones from an osteoclast library has provided a valuable approach for discovery of novel osteoclast proteins and led to the identification of a novel cathepsin. In addition, the availability of data from multiple human cDNA libraries has allowed us to compare the frequency of ESTs for cathepsin K from a number of cells and tissues. EST frequency suggested abundant osteoclast-selective expression of cathepsin K, and this has been confirmed by both in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. The results suggest that cathepsin K may play a specialized, and perhaps essential, role in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Selective inhibitors of cathepsin K may be useful in treatment of diseases of excessive bone loss, such as osteoporosis.

      Acknowledgments

      The initial EST clones used in this study were discovered as part of a joint collaboration between scientists at The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR), SmithKline Beecham, and Human Genome Sciences (HGS) using established EST methods(
      • Adams M.D.
      • Kelley J.M.
      • Gocayne J.D.
      • Dubnick M.
      • Polymeropoulos M.H.
      • Xiao H.
      • Merril C.R.
      • Wu A.
      • Olde B.
      • Moreno R.F.
      • Kerlavage A.R.
      • McCombie W.R.
      • Venter J.C.
      ,
      • Adams M.D.
      • Dubnick M.
      • Kerlavage A.R.
      • Moreno R.
      • Kelley J.M.
      • Utterback T.R.
      • Nagle J.W.
      • Fields C.
      • Venter J.C.
      ). These clones are part of a larger EST project(
      • Adams M.D.
      • et al.
      ). We thank Dr. R. H. Rothman (Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA) for supplying bone samples, Dr. R. D. Lackman (Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA) for supplying osteoclastomas, and the Anatomical Gift Foundation (Folkson, GA) for providing tissue samples. We also thank Frank McCabe for technical assistance, Drs. John Lee and Jeremy Bradbeer for critical review of the manuscript, and Drs. Brian Metcalf and Martin Rosenberg for continued support. We thank scientists at the sequencing facilities of HGS and TIGR, and the Bioinformatics staff at SmithKline Beecham. We would also like to thank Dr. Alan Barrett, Chair of the Advisory Panel on Peptidase Nomenclature to the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, for promptly responding to our request to resolve the nomenclature for this protease.

      REFERENCES

        • Baron R.
        Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism. Raven Press, New York1993: 3-9
        • Maciewicz R.A.
        • Etherington D.J.
        Biochem. J. 1988; 256: 433-440
        • Delaisse J.-M.
        • Eeckhout Y.
        • Vaes G.
        Biochem. J. 1980; 192: 365-368
        • Delaisse J.-M.
        • Eeckhout Y.
        • Vaes G.
        Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1984; 125: 441-447
        • Delaisse J.M.
        • Boyde A.
        • Maconnachie E.
        • Ali N.N.
        • Sear C.H.J.
        • Eeckhout Y.
        • Vaes G.
        • Jones S.J.
        Bone. 1987; 8: 305-313
        • Hill P.A.
        • Buttle D.J.
        • Jones S.J.
        • Boyde A.
        • Murata M.
        • Reynolds J.J.
        • Meikle M.C.
        J. Cell. Biochem. 1994; 56: 118-130
        • Lerner U.H.
        • Grubb A.
        J. Bone Miner. Res. 1992; 7: 433-439
        • Everts V.
        • Delaisse J.-M.
        • Korper W.
        • Niehof A.
        • Vaes G.
        • Beertsen W.
        J. Cell. Physiol. 1992; 150: 221-231
        • Delaisse J.-M.
        • Ledent P.
        • Vaes G.
        Biochem. J. 1991; 279: 167-174
        • Page A.E.
        • Warburton M.J.
        • Chambers T.J.
        • Pringle J.A.S.
        • Hayman A.R.
        Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1992; 1116: 57-66
        • Goto T.
        • Kiyoshima T.
        • Moroi R.
        • Tsukuba T.
        • Nishimura Y.
        • Himeno M.
        • Yamamoto K.
        • Tanaka T.
        Histochemistry. 1994; 101: 33-40
        • Goto T.
        • Tsukuba T.
        • Ayasaka N.
        • Yamamoto K.
        • Tanaka T.
        Histochemistry. 1992; 97: 13-18
        • Ohsawa Y.
        • Nitatori T.
        • Higuchi S.
        • Kominami E.
        • Uchiyama Y.
        J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1993; 41: 1075-1083
        • Goto T.
        • Tsukuba T.
        • Kiyoshima T.
        • Nishimura Y.
        • Kato K.
        • Yamamoto K.
        • Tanaka T.
        Histochemistry. 1993; 99: 411-414
        • Sasaki T.
        • Ueno-Matsuda E.
        Cell Tissue Res. 1993; 271: 177-179
        • Sannes P.L.
        • Schofield B.H.
        • McDonald D.F.
        J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1986; 34: 983-988
        • van Noorden C.J.F.
        • Vogels I.M.C.
        • Smith R.E.
        J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1989; 37: 617-624
        • Kakegawa H.
        • Nikawa T.
        • Tagami K.
        • Kamioka H.
        • Sumitani K.
        • Kawata T.
        • Drobnic-Kosorok M.
        • Lenarcic B.
        • Turk V.
        • Katunuma N.
        FEBS Lett. 1993; 321: 247-250
        • Rifkin B.R.
        • Vernillo A.T.
        • Kleckner A.P.
        • Auszmann J.M.
        • Rosenberg L.R.
        • Zimmerman M.
        Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991; 179: 63-69
        • Tagami K.
        • Kakegawa H.
        • Kamioka H.
        • Sumitani K.
        • Kawata T.
        • Lenarcic B.
        • Turk V.
        • Kutanuma N.
        FEBS Lett. 1994; 342: 308-312
        • Kremer M.
        • Judd J.
        • Rifkin B.
        • Auszmann J.
        • Oursler M.J.
        J. Cell. Biochem. 1995; 57: 271-279
        • Tezuka K.
        • Tezuka Y.
        • Maejima A.
        • Sato T.
        • Nemoto K.
        • Kamioka H.
        • Hakeda Y.
        • Kumegawa M.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 1106-1109
        • Shi G.-P.
        • Chapman H.A.
        • Bhairi S.M.
        • DeLeeuw C.
        • Reddy V.Y.
        • Weiss S.J.
        FEBS Lett. 1995; 357: 129-134
        • Bromme D.
        • Okamoto K.
        Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler. 1995; 376: 379-384
        • Drake F.
        • James I.
        • Connor J.
        • Rieman D.
        • Dodds R.
        • McCabe F.
        • Bertolini D.
        • Barthlow R.
        • Hastings G.
        • Gowen M.
        J. Bone Miner. Res. 1994; 9: S177
        • Li Y.P.
        • Alexander M.B.
        • Wucherpfennis A.L.
        • Chen W.
        • Yelick P.
        • Stashenko P.
        Mol. Biol. Cell. 1994; 5: 335a
        • Inaoka T.
        • Bilbe G.
        • Ishibashi O.
        • Tezuka K.
        • Kumegawa M.
        • Kokubo T.
        Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995; 206: 89-96
        • Adams M.D.
        • Kelley J.M.
        • Gocayne J.D.
        • Dubnick M.
        • Polymeropoulos M.H.
        • Xiao H.
        • Merril C.R.
        • Wu A.
        • Olde B.
        • Moreno R.F.
        • Kerlavage A.R.
        • McCombie W.R.
        • Venter J.C.
        Science. 1991; 252: 1651-1656
        • Adams M.D.
        • Dubnick M.
        • Kerlavage A.R.
        • Moreno R.
        • Kelley J.M.
        • Utterback T.R.
        • Nagle J.W.
        • Fields C.
        • Venter J.C.
        Nature. 1992; 355: 632-634
        • Adams M.D.
        • et al.
        Nature. 1995; 377: 3-174
        • Dodds R.A.
        • Gowen M.
        • Bradbeer J.N.
        J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1994; 42: 599-606
        • Zeller R.
        • Rogers M.
        Jansen K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York1991: 14.3.1-14.3.11
        • Li Y.-P.
        • Alexander M.
        • Wucherpfennig A.L.
        • Yelick P.
        • Chen W.
        • Stashenko P.
        J. Bone Miner. Res. 1995; 10: 1197-1202
        • Bossard M.J.
        • Tomaszek T.A.
        • Thompson S.K.
        • Amegadzie B.Y.
        • Hanning C.R.
        • Jones C.
        • Kurdyla J.T.
        • McNulty D.E.
        • Drake F.H.
        • Gowen M.
        • Levy M.A.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 12517-12524