If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260Departments of Pediatrics, and Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Departments of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260Geriatric Research Educational and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260Departments of Pediatrics, and Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, 3434 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Tel.: 412-383-1900; Fax: 412-624-0943
Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260Departments of Pediatrics, and Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
* This work was supported by NINDS National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 NS38620 and P50 NS30318 NICHD T32 HD 40686 and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Poly(ADP-ribosylation), primarily via poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), is a pluripotent cellular process important for maintenance of genomic integrity and RNA transcription in cells. However, during conditions of oxidative stress and energy depletion, poly(ADP-ribosylation) paradoxically contributes to mitochondrial failure and cell death. Although it has been presumed that poly(ADP-ribosylation) within the nucleus mediates this pathologic process, PARP-1 and other poly(ADP-ribosyltransferases) are also localized within mitochondria. To this end, the presence of PARP-1 and poly(ADP-ribosylation) were verified within mitochondrial fractions from primary cortical neurons and fibroblasts. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosylation) within the mitochondrial compartment preserved transmembrane potential (ΔΨm), NAD+content, and cellular respiration, prevented release of apoptosis-inducing factor, and reduced neuronal cell death triggered by oxidative stress. Treatment with liposomal NAD+ also preserved ΔΨm and cellular respiration during oxidative stress. Furthermore, inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosylation) prevented intranuclear localization of apoptosis-inducing factor and protected neurons from excitotoxic injury; and PARP-1 null fibroblasts were protected from oxidative stress-induced cell death. Collectively these data suggest that poly(ADP-ribosylation) compartmentalized to the mitochondria can be converted from a homeostatic process to a mechanism of cell death when oxidative stress is accompanied by energy depletion. These data implicate intra-mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) as an important therapeutic target for central nervous system and other diseases associated with oxidative stress and energy failure.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-11; EC 2.4.2.30), the most abundant poly(ADP-ribosyltransferase) in mammalian cells, plays an essential role in excitotoxic neuronal death both in vitroand in vivo (
). The presumptive mechanism for this neurotoxic effect involves, sequentially, increases in [Ca2+]i via glutamate receptors, activation of nitric-oxide synthase, generation of the free radical peroxynitrite (ONOO−), activation of PARP-1 in response to genomic DNA damage, consumption of NAD+ during the formation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymers, and death via energy failure (
). However, the capacity for PARP-1 activation within the nucleus to deplete total cellular energy stores, particularly compartmentalized within mitochondria, remains to be established (
), we hypothesized that inhibition of mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) may play a pivotal role in neuronal cell survival under conditions of oxidative stress and excitotoxicity.
Here we show that inhibition of mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) preserves mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm) and NAD+ content, maintains cellular respiration, and reduces neuronal cell death triggered by oxidative stress or excitotoxicity. Treatment with liposome-encapsulated NAD+ or ATP also preserved ΔΨm and cellular respiration, suggesting that cells can also be rescued by energy repletion after oxidative stress. Our findings suggest that NAD+ depletion and energy failure convert poly(ADP-ribosylation) compartmentalized within mitochondria from a homeostatic process to a mechanism of neuronal death, providing a unifying mechanism by which PARP-1 can regulate cell death under conditions of mitochondrial dysfunction, and identifying multiple intracellular targets for inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribosylation). These findings have relevance to both acute and chronic central nervous system diseases where oxidative stress is a contributing factor, including stroke, traumatic brain injury, seizures, and Parkinson's disease and other neurondegenerative diseases (
PARP enzyme activity was measured using a commercial kit (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD). Briefly, 1 μg of mitochondrial or nuclear protein extracts were incubated in reaction buffer containing histones and [32P]NAD ± exogenous DNA with strand breaks. After incubating at room temperature for 10 min, reactions were terminated and proteins were precipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid. Incorporation of 32P was determined by scintillation counting.
Cell Cultures and Pharmacological Studies
Primary cortical neuron-enriched cultures were prepared from 16 to 17-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat embryos as described (
). Dissociated cell suspensions were placed in 96-well plates (5 × 104 cells/well) or in plastic dishes coated with poly-d-lysine (1.3 × 107 cells/well). Experiments were performed between 7 and 12 days in vitro.
ONOO−
Neuron-enriched cultures were exposed to 100–250 μm ONOO− (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) in buffer for 30 min, whereupon fresh media was replaced.
SIN-1—2 mm SIN-1 (Cayman Chemical) or 20% Me2SO vehicle in culture media was added to cells in 96-well plates.
Glutamate
Cells were exposed to varying concentrations ofl-glutamate with 5 μm glycine (Sigma) in culture media for 10 min. Cultures were pre- or post- treated with either the PARP inhibitor 5-iodo-6-amino-1,2-benzyopyrone (INH2BP) (
) or PBS vehicle, or liposomally encapsulated NAD+ or ATP or vehicles (empty liposomes or buffer). Liposomal NAD+ and ATP were prepared using a modification of the thin-film method (
) were cultured in 96-well plates or in plastic dishes to confluence. For cytotoxicity experiments cells were exposed to 250 μm ONOO− with or without 100 μm INH2BP.
Immunocytochemistry and Confocal Microscopy
Neurons grown on poly-d-lysine-coated glass coverslips were fixed for 30 min in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4). Cells were incubated with 5% normal donkey serum and 2% bovine serum albumin in PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 for 1 h to permeabilize cell membranes. The cells were then incubated in a 1:100 dilution of rabbit polyclonal anti-HSP60 (StressGen, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada) and a 1:200 dilution of poly(ADP-ribose) (Biomol, Reading, PA) for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by incubation in the appropriate secondary antibody. Cells were examined using a Leica TCS NT confocal tri-laser scanning inverted microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) as previously described (
), and Western blotting was performed using primary antibodies against: poly(ADP-ribose) polymers (BioMol, Reading, PA), PARP (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), the carboxyl terminus of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA), cytochrome c (BD Pharmingen), and cytochromec oxidase (BD Pharmingen) at optimized dilutions.
Assessment of ΔΨm
ΔΨm was determined using 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolocarbocyanine iodide (JC-1), a cationic dye that accumulates in mitochondria in a membrane potential-dependent manner (
). Data are presented as a green (488/580 nm)/red (535/610 nm) fluorescence intensity ratio, with an increased ratio representing mitochondrial depolarization. Cells grown on collagen-coated coverslips were incubated in 1 μg/ml JC-1 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 20 min at 37 °C. Cells were pretreated with INH2BP, FP-15, or vehicle. The media was replaced with buffer containing ONOO− for 5 min, whereupon the ONOO− was removed and media was replaced. Green/red fluorescent ratios were measured in five predefined fields containing 2–5 cells/field using an Olympus IX70 microscope with a ×60 oil immersion 1.4 numerical aperature optic and an automated stage. Image acquisition and analysis were performed using Simple PCI (Compix, Inc., Cranberry, PA). A minimum of 2 coverslips were imaged per condition.
Determination of NAD+
Cellular NAD+ levels were measured by the enzymatic cycling method using alcohol dehydrogenase (
) with modifications. Cells were homogenized in 0.05 m K phosphate buffer containing 0.1 m nicotinamide (pH 6.0), frozen rapidly, placed in a boiling water bath for 5 min, then cooled in an ice bath for 5 min. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 1,000 rpm at 4 °C, then added to a reaction mixture containing 0.065 mglycylglycine, 0.1 m nicotinamide, 0.5 methanol, alcohol dehydrogenase, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and phenazine methosulfate at pH 7.4. NAD+ in the sample generates NADH, which reduces MTT through the intermediation of phenazine methosulfate to formazan. The reaction was allowed to run for 5 min and the absorbance determined at A556. A standard curve was generated using known concentrations of NAD+ and NAD+ levels were calculated.
Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis
Pulsed field gel electrophoresis was performed as described (
). Briefly, chromosomal DNA samples were prepared in agarose plugs using a CHEF Mammalian Genomic DNA Plug Kit (Bio-Rad). Fragments were separated on a 1.2% agarose gel at 14 °C for 20 h. Field strengths were 180 V forward and 120 V reverse, initial and final switching time was set at 5–60 s with a linear ramp. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.
Isolated Brain Mitochondria
Adult Sprague-Dawley rat brain mitochondria were isolated by differential centrifugation as described (
). Mitochondrial viability was verified by measuring oxygen consumption. Mitochondria were suspended in a reaction buffer to a final concentration of 1 mg of mitochondrial protein/ml and placed in reaction tubes. Drug or vehicle was added and the mitochondria were placed in a 37 °C water bath for 15 min, then 750 μm ONOO− or pH-adjusted vehicle were added. This concentration of ONOO− was found to completely depolarize mitochondria as determined by Safranin-O. Aliquots of the isolated mitochondrial suspensions were removed at baseline (−15 min), time 0 and 5 min, centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and mitochondrial pellets and supernatants were frozen and stored for batch analysis. For assessment of mitochondrial protein release 20 μl of mitochondria supernatants were dialyzed against PBS in a mini-dialysis device (Pierce). Mitochondrial pellets were homogenized in lysis buffer and handled as described above.
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cell Death
Following cytotoxicity and drug treatments, cells were harvested using trypsin-EDTA, washed once in ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in 1 ml of Annexin V binding buffer (10 mm Hepes, pH 7.4, 140 mm NaCl, 2.5 mm CaCl2). 1 × 105 cells were stained with 5 μl of Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate and 5 μg/ml propridium iodide (PI) in 100 μl of Annexin V binding buffer at 4 °C. After 20 min, 400 μl of binding buffer was added to each tube and samples were analyzed using a tri-laser FACS Calibur flow cytometer.
RESULTS
Mitochondrial Poly(ADP-ribosylation) in Fibroblasts and Neurons
We verified that poly(ADP-ribosylation) could be stimulated in mitochondria. PARP-1 was detected in both nuclear and mitochondrial subcellular fractions in fibroblasts from PARP-1+/+ but not PARP-1−/− mice (Fig.1a). Endogenous PARP activity, measured via incorporation of [32P]NAD in protein lysates incubated in the absence of nicked-DNA, showed poly(ADP-ribosylation) in both nuclear and mitochondrial cell fractions (Fig. 1b). A lesser degree of baseline PARP activity was detected in nuclear fractions from PARP−/− fibroblasts, with activity ∼20% of that seen in PARP+/+ fibroblasts. Poly(ADP-ribosylation) in control cells suggests that baseline oxidative DNA damage is occurring within both mitochondria and cell nuclei, and is consistent with a previous study (
) showing baseline PARP-1 activity in neurons. Baseline PARP activity was also detected in mitochondrial fractions from PARP−/− fibroblasts, similarly, activity was ∼20% of that seen in PARP+/+ fibroblasts. PARP enzyme activity relative to total protein was greater in mitochondrial compared with nuclear cell fractions (Fig. 1b).
Figure 1PARP-1 and poly(ADP-ribosylation) in mitochondria.a, PARP-1 was detected in both nuclear and mitochondrial fractions from PARP-1+/+ but not PARP-1−/− cells (representative of 5 wells/group).b, PARP activity in nuclear and mitochondrial protein lysates obtained from PARP-1+/+ fibroblasts. A lesser degree of PARP activity was detected in nuclear and mitochondrial protein lysates obtained from PARP-1−/− fibroblasts (n = 3/group; cpm, counts per min).c, PARP activity in nuclear and mitochondrial protein lysates obtained from naive adult rat brain is inhibited by INH2BP in a dose-dependent manner (−DNA, incubated without exogenous nicked DNA; mean ± S.D.; n = 4 samples/group; *, p < 0.05 versus no INH2BP, one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoctest. d, confocal dual-label immunohistochemical images with differential interference contrast using antibodies against poly(ADP-ribose) polymers (red) and the mitochondrial marker Hsp60 (green) detected poly(ADP-ribosylation) in mitochondria under baseline conditions (yellow;arrows).
Similar to fibroblasts from wild-type mice, PARP activity was seen in mitochondrial fractions from normal adult rat brain. Mitochondrial and nuclear protein lysates were incubated with and without nicked DNA to activate PARP in the presence or absence of the potent PARP inhibitor INH2BP (
). PARP enzyme activity that was inhibited by INH2BP in a dose-dependent manner was detected in both mitochondrial and nuclear fractions (Fig. 1c). A portion of total PARP was previously activated, as protein samples incubated without nicked DNA demonstrated incorporation of [32P]ADP to levels that were ∼40% of total PARP activity. Similar to fibroblasts, PARP activity/μg of protein was greater in mitochondrial compared with nuclear protein lysates. Consistent with this finding, poly(ADP-ribosylation), a surrogate marker of PARP activation, was detected to a greater degree in mitochondria versus nuclei in neurons labeled with antibodies against poly(ADP-ribose) polymers and the mitochondrial marker heat shock protein 60 (hsp60) examined using laser confocal microscopy (Fig. 1d).
Mitochondrial Poly(ADP-ribosylation) Is Inhibited by 5-Iodo-6-amino-1,2-benzyopyrone
Consistent with the direct measurement of PARP activity using [32P]NAD+, poly(ADP-ribose) polymer formation was more abundant in the mitochondrial versus nuclear protein fraction in control cells (Fig. 2). Thirty min to 2 h after exposure to ONOO−, there was a non-significant increase in nuclear poly(ADP-ribosylation) compared with control samples that were not affected by INH2BP. This non-significant increase in nuclear PARP activity in neurons using this dose of ONOO− is similar to reports in fibroblasts, where 500 μm ONOO− is required to stimulate PARP activity (
). In contrast to nuclear poly(ADP-ribosylation), mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) was unchanged 30 min to 2 h after exposure to ONOO−, however, was significantly reduced by pretreatment with INH2BP versus vehicle (p < 0.001). Multiple poly(ADP-ribosylated) proteins were seen in fractions from each cellular compartment, however, patterns differed with primarily lower molecular weight proteins seen in mitochondrial fractions, compared with ∼110–140- and 30-kDa bands seen in nuclear fractions. Thus, in neurons using this experimental paradigm, INH2BP reduces basal PARP activity in mitochondria.
Figure 2Inhibition of mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) in neurons. Poly(ADP-ribosylation) detected in nuclear (a) and mitochondrial (b) protein lysates from untreated neurons and in neurons after exposure to ONOO−. Pretreatment with 100 μm INH2BP reduced poly(ADP-ribosylation) in mitochondrial but not nuclear fractions compared with vehicle. Graphs show mean relative optical densities for poly(ADP-ribosylated) proteins at 30 min to 2 h, obtained from 4 gels and represented as the changeversus control (mean ± S.E., *, p < 0.001 versus vehicle, t test).
Inhibition of Mitochondrial Poly(ADP-ribosylation) Prevents Oxidative Stress-induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction and AIF Release and Neuronal Cell Death
To determine whether 250 μmONOO− produces mitochondrial dysfunction directly, ΔΨm, NAD levels, and cellular respiration and were evaluated. Fig. 3a shows that ΔΨm, determined using the fluorescent dye JC-1 (
), is rapidly lost in neurons exposed to ONOO−, and that PARP inhibition attenuates loss of ΔΨm. Direct quenching of ONOO− using the peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst FP15 (
), in neurons treated with ONOO− or the nitric oxide donor SIN-1, in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3c). This appears to be because of maintenance of cellular energy stores, as INH2BP prevents reductions in NAD+ seen early after exposure to ONOO− (Fig. 3d). In support of the role for energy substrate depletion as a mechanism for mitochondrial dysfunction, post-treatment with both liposome-encapsulated NAD+ and ATP (
), but not empty liposomes or buffer, partially preserved cellular respiration (MTT) in neurons 22 h after exposure to ONOO− (Fig. 3e). Pretreatment with liposome-encapsulated NAD+ also preserved ΔΨmversus empty liposomes (Fig.3f).
Figure 3Inhibition of mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) or exogenous NAD or ATP preserves cellular energetics in neurons after oxidative stress.a andb, pretreatment with INH2BP or FP15 preserves ΔΨmversus vehicle (vehicle, red; drug, blue; INH2BP alone, green; mean ± S.D.). Immunofluorescent images from representative cells for each condition from three independent experiments are shown in the panels.c, treatment with INH2BP preserves cellular respiration at 2 h after ONOO− or SIN-1 (n = 12/group for ONOO− and 3/group for SIN-1; *,p < 0.05 versus vehicle). d, treatment with 100 μm INH2BP preserves cellular NAD+ content versus vehicle (n = 3–6/group; *, p < 0.05). e, treatment with liposome encapsulated NAD+ (200 μm) or ATP (200 μm), but not empty liposomes or buffer, preserves cellular respiration at 22 h (Lipo, liposomes; n = 3/group; *,p < 0.05 versus vehicle). f, pretreatment with 200 μm liposomal NAD+preserves ΔΨmversus empty liposomes (empty liposomes, red; liposomal NAD+,green; mean ± S.D.). Immunofluorescent images with differential interference contrast from representative cells for each condition are shown in the panels. For c, d, and e, mean ± S.D.; one- or two-way analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc test.
We have previously shown that in neurons ONOO− induces nuclear translocation of AIF and large-scale DNA fragmentation, the signature event in AIF-mediated cell death, and that these events can be inhibited by treatment with the ONOO− decomposition catalyst FP15 (
). Similar to FP15, INH2BP completely blocks nuclear translocation of AIF and large-scale DNA fragmentation (Fig.4, a and b), supporting a role for poly(ADP-ribosylation) in mitochondrial release of AIF and consistent with the report by Yu and colleagues (
). Inhibition or poly(ADP-ribosylation) also prevents egress of cytochromec from mitochondria to the cytosol after ONOO−exposure. Neuronal cell death induced by ONOO−, assessed by flow cytometry using PI and Annexin V labeling, is reduced by pretreatment with INH2BP (Fig. 4c). Compared with vehicle treatment, PARP inhibition reduced both PI+/Annexin V+ (14versus 24%, INH2BP versus vehicle, respectively) and PI−/Annexin V+ (46 versus 27%, INH2BP versus vehicle, respectively) cell profiles. In isolated brain mitochondria (
), a dose of ONOO− (750 μm) that completely depolarizes the mitochondrial membrane initiates rapid release of AIF and cytochrome c(Fig. 5). This dose of ONOO−is relatively high, although it is likely that some proportion of ONOO− was quenched by albumin in the mitochondrial reaction buffer. AIF release, but not cytochrome c release, was inhibited by pretreating isolated viable brain mitochondria with INH2BP. Collectively, these data suggest that inhibition of mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) preserves ΔΨm and reduces programmed cell death mediated by AIF.
Figure 4Inhibition of mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) reduces apoptotic cell death in neurons after oxidative stress.a, INH2BP inhibits nuclear localization of AIF and appearance of cytosolic cytochromec. b, INH2BP prevents large-scale DNA fragmentation detected by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis at 22 h. c, INH2BP reduced PI+/Annexin V+ and PI−/Annexin V+ cells 24 h after 250 μm ONOO−versus vehicle (1 × 105 cells/condition). Representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 5Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosylation) attenuates release of AIF from isolated brain mitochondria after depolarization by ONOO−.a, complete depolarization was seen using 750 μm ONOO−and was confirmed by treating mitochondria with carbonyl cyanidep-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl hydrazone (FCCP). INH2BP did not effect membrane potential in isolated mitochondria after ONOO− (data not shown). b, AIF release was prevented by treating depolarized mitochondria with INH2BP. Representative of four independent experiments.
), and both mechanisms are felt to involve ONOO−, the cytoprotective effect of INH2BP in neurons treated with glutamate was tested. PARP inhibition preserved cellular respiration after glutamate/glycine exposure (Fig.6a) and prevented nuclear translocation of AIF (Fig. 6b) compared with vehicle. PARP inhibition reduced both necrotic (1 versus 12%, INH2BPversus vehicle, respectively) and apoptotic (4versus 14%, INH2BP versus vehicle, respectively) cell death profiles induced by exogenous glutamate/glycine (Fig.6b). Of note, PARP inhibition led to an increase in Annexin V+/PI− cell profiles (26 versus1%, INH2BP versus vehicle, respectively), suggesting the potential of delayed cell death, or a shift to an earlier stage of apoptosis in this paradigm.
Figure 6Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosylation) preserves cellular respiration and attenuates apoptotic and necrotic cell death in neurons after glutamate excitotoxicity.a, increasing concentrations of glutamate + 5 μm glycine reduces cellular respiration and is inhibited by pretreatment with 100 μm INH2BP (n = 3/group; mean ± S.D.; *, p < 0.05versus vehicle; #, p < 0.05versus control; two-way analysis of variance with Tukeypost-hoc test). b, pretreatment with 100 μm INH2BP prevents nuclear localization of AIF at 22 h after 5 μm glutamate, 5 μm glycine.c, pretreatment with 100 μm INH2BP reduced PI+/Annexin V+ and PI+/Annexin V− cells, but increased PI−/Annexin V+ cells, 24 h after 5 μm glutamate, 5 μm glycineversus vehicle (1 × 105 cells/condition; representative of three independent experiments).
), PARP-1−/− fibroblasts were less sensitive to ONOO−-induced cytoxicity. The typical reductions in cellular respiration (MTT), increases in lactate dehydrogenase release, and cell death seen after ONOO− exposure were seen in PARP+/+ but not PARP−/− cells (Fig.7, a–c). These events were prevented in the case of MTT and lactate dehydrogenase release was determined 2 h after exposure to ONOO−, and inhibited in the case of PI extrusion determined 22 h after exposure to ONOO−, by treatment with INH2BP. These data are consistent with previous reports demonstrating that PARP inhibition reduces necrotic cell death.
Figure 7PARP-1 inhibition protects fibroblasts from oxidative/nitrosative stress.a, cellular respiration (MTT) is reduced 2 h after exposure to 250 μmONOO− in PARP-1+/+ cells, but not PARP-1−/− cells or PARP-1+/+ cells pretreated with 100 μm INH2BP (n = 6/ group; mean ± S.D.; *, p < 0.05 versuscontrol, t test). b, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release is increased 2 h after exposure to 250 μm ONOO− in PARP-1+/+ cells, but not PARP-1−/− cells or PARP-1+/+ cells pretreated with 100 μm INH2BP (n = 6/group; mean ± S.D.; *, p < 0.05versus control, t test). c, PI+ and Annexin V+ cell profiles are increased 22 h after exposure to 250 μm ONOO− in PARP-1+/+ (WT, wild-type) cells, but not PARP-1−/− (KO, knockout) or PARP-1+/+ cells pretreated with 100 μm INH2BP (1 × 105 cells/condition).
), PARP-1 expression and proteolysis were examined in nuclear and mitochondrial protein fractions. In fibroblasts, changes in PARP-1 expression were not seen after exposure to 250 μm ONOO− in either the nuclear or mitochondrial compartments (Fig.8a). As expected, PARP-1 was not detected in PARP-1−/− cells. PARP-1 proteolysis was not detected after exposure to 250 μm ONOO−, consistent with necrotic, caspase-independent cell death (Fig. 7). In primary cortical neurons, baseline PARP-1 proteolysis was detected in both the mitochondrial and nuclear compartment, consistent with either apoptosis in dead glial elements typical of neuron-enriched cultures, or some degree of baseline apoptotic neuronal death (Fig.8b). After exposure to 250 μmONOO−, PARP-1 cleavage did not appear to be altered, with the exception of the 24-h time point, where a reduction in both PARP-1 and cleaved PARP-1 was seen in both nuclear and mitochondrial fractions, reflecting ONOO−-induced cell death. Treatment with INH2BP reduced PARP-1 proteolysis induced by ONOO− in the mitochondrial, and to a lesser degree the nuclear compartment. These data suggest that INH2BP reduces caspase-mediated proteolysis of PARP-1 in both compartments, and are consistent with some degree of caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death in this paradigm (Fig. 4).
Figure 8Effect of ONOO− on PARP-1expression and proteolysis in fibroblasts and primary cortical neurons.a, in fibroblasts, changes in PARP-1 expression were not seen after exposure to 250 μmONOO− in either the nuclear or mitochondrial compartments. PARP-1 was not detected in PARP-1−/− cells. b, in neurons, baseline PARP-1 proteolysis was detected in both the mitochondrial and nuclear compartment. After exposure to 250 μm ONOO−, PARP-1 cleavage was not altered. Treatment with 100 μm INH2BP reduced PARP-1 proteolysis induced by ONOO− in the mitochondrial, and to a lesser degree the nuclear compartment. The reduction in PARP-1 and cleaved PARP-1 at 24 h in vehicle-treated cells exposed to ONOO− likely represents cell death.
Whereas poly(ADP-ribosylation) contributes to cell homeostasis under basal conditions, pharmacological or genetic inhibition of PARP during conditions of cellular stress, e.g. energy failure or oxidative stress, is beneficial (
). Under these circumstances, it has been proposed that ONOO− produces genomic DNA damage activating nuclear PARP-1, with subsequent cellular NAD+ depletion, followed by secondary mitochondrial injury, AIF release and nuclear translocation, and cell death (
). However, our data suggest that oxidative stress produces mitochondrial dysfunction directly by promoting rapid loss of ΔΨm. Intramitochondrial PARP activity during conditions of limited mitochondrial NAD+ stores related to impaired NAD recycling would exacerbate energy failure by consuming mitochondrial NAD+directly. In support of this, inhibition of basal mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) preserves ΔΨm, NAD+levels, and cellular respiration, prevents mitochondrial release of AIF, and attenuates large-scale DNA fragmentation and cell death after oxidative stress. Furthermore, replenishment of NAD+ also preserves ΔΨm and cellular respiration. These data indicate that inhibition of mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) and energy repletion represent effective strategies to protect cells in the face of insults producing energy failure, and are consistent with the presumption that energy depletion contributes to PARP-related cytotoxicity. PARP inhibition has also been shown to directly protect electron transport chain complexes from inactivation induced by oxidative stress (
) explain the rapid beneficial effects of PARP inhibition after exposure to extramitochondrial ONOO−. In addition, compartmentalization of nitric-oxide synthase and oxygen radicals within mitochondria are a potential source of internally generated ONOO− (
). Because mitochondrial nitric-oxide synthase is calcium-dependent, elevations in [Ca2+]i occurring under conditions of excitotoxicity could result in both activation of cytosolic and mitochondrial nitric-oxide synthase providing two sources of ONOO− (
). The results of this study do not discount the importance of nuclear PARP-1 activation in terms of cellular NAD+ consumption; however, it is apparent that mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) contributes at least in part to the determination of cellular fate under circumstances of NAD+ depletion and energy failure.
Traditionally, PARP-mediated cell death has been felt to be primarily necrotic in nature (
). AIF-mediated programmed cell death has many phenotypic features of developmental apoptosis such as DNA fragmentation, phosphatidylserine exposure, and regulation by bcl-2 family proteins; however, important differences also exist, such as large-scale versusoligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation and cell death that progresses despite caspase inhibition (
). Both necrotic and AIF-mediated programmed cell death are felt to be caspase-independent, and we have previously reported that the caspase inhibitorsN-benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp(OMe)-fluoromethylketone (VAD) and boc-Asp(OMe)-fluromethylketone (BAF) do not protect neurons from AIF-mediated cell death induced by ONOO− (
). In contrast, the present data show that the PARP inhibitor INH2BP protects cells from AIF-mediated cell death induced by ONOO− or glutamate. Whereas INH2BP reduced apoptotic cell death after ONOO− (PI extrusion and Annexin V binding; Fig.4c), after glutamate exposure cell death was reduced (PI extrusion; Fig. 6c) but a pre-apoptotic phenotype was expressed (PI−/Annexin V binding) in neurons. The concept that preventing apoptosis may switch the mode of cell death to necrosis is not novel (
); however, these data suggest the possibility that preventing necrosis may switch the mode of cell death to apoptosis. This concept, particularly in paradigms that conserve cellular energy stores (
), warrants further study. PARP inhibition also reduced necrosis in fibroblasts exposed to ONOO−, demonstrating differences not only related to the cytotoxicity paradigm chosen, but also in the cell type used. Differences in response to ONOO− between fibroblasts and neurons may be related to dividing versus non-dividing cells, immortalizedversus primary cell cultures, mitochondrial density, or other factors. Nonetheless, taken together these data are consistent with a role for mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) in caspase-independent cell death.
Whereas activation of PARP during times where cellular energy stores are limited is detrimental (
), it is important to remember that poly(ADP-ribosylation) serves many homeostatic functions as well. In addition to facilitating both genomic and mitochondrial DNA repair (
). Baseline poly(ADP-ribosylation) within both nuclear and mitochondrial compartments as demonstrated in this study, support such homeostatic functions in cells. In neurons, poly(ADP-ribosylation) may also participate in long-term potentiation (
). Collectively these data suggest that poly(ADP-ribosylation) compartmentalized to both mitochondria and nuclei can be converted from a homeostatic process to a mechanism of cell death when oxidative stress is accompanied by energy depletion.
A direct role for mitochondrial poly(ADP-ribosylation) in cell death associated with loss of ΔΨm, mitochondrial dysfunction, and release of AIF is implicated. These data do not refute previous hypotheses suggesting that overactivation of nuclear PARP-1 consumes total cellular energy stores contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death. However, these data do represent a paradigm shift, where poly(ADP-ribosylation) compartmentalized within the mitochondria contributes to AIF release and cell death in the face of cellular energy failure.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Paula Nathaniel and Lauren Richards for providing isolated mitochondrial preparations, Dr. Margaret Satchell for adaptation of the NAD assay, and Dr. Ian Reynolds for valuable suggestions.