Advertisement
Enzyme Catalysis and Regulation| Volume 281, ISSUE 49, P37586-37593, December 08, 2006

Download started.

Ok

Discovery of a New Prokaryotic Type I GTP Cyclohydrolase Family*

  • Basma El Yacoubi
    Footnotes
    Affiliations
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
    Search for articles by this author
  • Shilah Bonnett
    Footnotes
    Affiliations
    Department of Chemistry, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97201
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jessica N. Anderson
    Affiliations
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
    Search for articles by this author
  • Manal A. Swairjo
    Affiliations
    Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California 91766-1854
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dirk Iwata-Reuyl
    Correspondence
    To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207. Tel.: 503-725-5737; Fax: 503-725-9525
    Affiliations
    Department of Chemistry, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97201
    Search for articles by this author
  • Valérie de Crécy-Lagard
    Correspondence
    To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110700, Gainesville, FL 32611-0700. Tel.: 352-392-9416; Fax: 352-392-5922
    Affiliations
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    * This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 GM70641-01 (to V. d. C.-L. and D. I.-R.) and by National Science Foundation Award MCB-0516948 (to V. d. C.-L.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
    The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Table 1.
    1 These two authors contributed equally to this work.
Open AccessPublished:October 10, 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M607114200
      GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCYH-I) is the first enzyme of the de novo tetrahydrofolate biosynthetic pathway present in bacteria, fungi, and plants, and encoded in Escherichia coli by the folE gene. It is also the first enzyme of the biopterin (BH4) pathway in Homo sapiens, where it is encoded by a homologous folE gene. A homology-based search of GCYH-I orthologs in all sequenced bacteria revealed a group of microbes, including several clinically important pathogens, that encoded all of the enzymes of the tetrahydrofolate biosynthesis pathway but GCYH-I, suggesting that an alternate family was present in these organisms. A prediction based on phylogenetic occurrence and physical clustering identified the COG1469 family as a potential candidate for this missing enzyme family. The GCYH-I activity of COG1469 family proteins from a variety of sources (Thermotoga maritima, Bacillus subtilis, Acinetobacter baylyi, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae) was experimentally verified in vivo and/or in vitro. Although there is no detectable sequence homology with the canonical GCYH-I, protein fold recognition based on sequence profiles, secondary structure, and solvation potential information suggests that, like GCYH-I proteins, COG1469 proteins are members of the tunnel-fold (T-fold) structural superfamily. This new GCYH-I family is found in ∼20% of sequenced bacteria and is prevalent in Archaea, but the family is to this date absent in Eukarya.
      Folic acid, in the form of various tetrahydrofolate (THF)
      The abbreviations used are: THF, tetrahydrofolate; GCYH-I, GTP cyclohydrolase I; H2NTP, 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate; dT, thymidine; Kan, kanamycin; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; DHNA, 7,8-dihydroneopterin aldolase.
      derivatives, serves as a cofactor in one-carbon transfer reactions during the synthesis of purines, thymidylate, pantothenate, glycine, serine, and methionine in all kingdoms of life (
      • Nichol C.A.
      • Smith G.K.
      • Duch D.S.
      ). In bacteria THF is also involved in the biosynthesis of the initiator formylmethionyl-tRNA (
      • Clark B.F.
      • Marcker K.A.
      ). Plants, fungi, and most bacteria synthesize THF de novo from GTP and p-aminobenzoic acid (
      • Hanson A.D.
      • Gregory J.F.
      • II I
      ,
      • Cossins E.A.
      • Chen L.
      ). Animals lack key enzymes of the folate biosynthetic pathway, and thus a dietary source of folate is required for normal growth and development (
      • Lucock M.
      ). The folate pathway has a storied history as an important target in antibacterial therapeutics and cancer chemotherapy; dihydropteroate synthase is the target of the sulfonamides, the first synthetic drugs developed with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity (
      • Huovinen P.
      • Sundström L.
      • Swedberg G.
      • Sköld O.
      ), and dihydrofolate reductase is the target of methotrexate, the first anticancer chemotherapy developed.
      GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCYH-I; EC 3.5.4.16) is the first enzyme of the de novo THF pathway (
      • Nichol C.A.
      • Smith G.K.
      • Duch D.S.
      ). It is encoded in Escherichia coli by the folE gene (
      • Katzenmeier G.
      • Schmid C.
      • Kellermann J.
      • Lottspeich F.
      • Bacher A.
      ,
      • Schoedon G.
      • Redweik U.
      • Frank G.
      • Cotton R.G.
      • Blau N.
      ) and catalyzes a complex reaction (
      • Yim J.J.
      • Brown G.M.
      ) that begins with hydrolytic ring opening of the purine ring at C-8 to generate an N-formyl intermediate, which is then the site for a second hydrolysis with concomitant loss of C-8 as formic acid. In the subsequent steps of the reaction, the ribosyl moiety undergoes ring opening and an Amadori rearrangement followed by cyclization to generate the pterin ring in THF (Fig. 1). A homologous GCYH-I is found in mammals and other higher eukaryotes, where it catalyzes the first step of the biopterin (BH4) pathway (Fig. 1), an essential cofactor for aromatic amino acid oxidation in the biosynthesis of tyrosine and neuro-transmitters, such as serotonin and 3,4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine (
      • Thony B.
      • Auerbach G.
      • Blau N.
      ,
      • Bonafe L.
      • Thony B.
      • Penzien J.M.
      • Czarnecki B.
      • Blau N.
      ). Although several enzymes in the folate pathway have proven to be important antimicrobial targets (
      • Huovinen P.
      • Sundström L.
      • Swedberg G.
      • Sköld O.
      ), the presence of homologous GCYH-I enzymes in both humans and bacteria has precluded the development of GCYH-I as a viable target.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      FIGURE 1The reaction catalyzed by GCYH-I and the metabolic fate of H2NTP.
      The product of GCYH-I, 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate (H2NTP), is subsequently dephosphorylated to 7,8-dihydroneopterin by both specific and nonspecific phosphatases (
      • Klaus S.M.
      • Wegkamp A.
      • Sybesma W.
      • Hugenholtz J.
      • Gregory 3rd, J.F.
      • Hanson A.D.
      ), and the remainder of THF biosynthesis is carried out by the enzymes encoded by the folBKPCA genes (in E. coli) (
      • Green J.C.
      • Nichols B.P.
      • Matthews R.G.
      ). Analysis of the distribution of the folate biosynthetic genes among sequenced organisms using the newly developed SEED data base (
      • Overbeek R.
      • Begley T.
      • Butler R.M.
      • Choudhuri J.V.
      • Chuang H.Y.
      • Cohoon M.
      • de Crécy-Lagard V.
      • Diaz N.
      • Disz T.
      • Edwards R.
      • Fonstein M.
      • Frank E.D.
      • Gerdes S.
      • Glass E.M.
      • Goesmann A.
      • Hanson A.
      • Iwata-Reuyl D.
      • Jensen R.
      • Jamshidi N.
      • Krause L.
      • Kubal M.
      • Larsen N.
      • Linke B.
      • McHardy A.C.
      • Meyer F.
      • Neuweger H.
      • Olsen G.
      • Olson R.
      • Osterman A.
      • Portnoy V.
      • Pusch G.D.
      • Rodionov D.A.
      • Ruckert C.
      • Steiner J.
      • Stevens R.
      • Thiele I.
      • Vassieva O.
      • Ye Y.
      • Zagnitko O.
      • Vonstein V.
      ) revealed that a large group of bacteria (Table 1) do not contain orthologs of folE while orthologs of all the other folate biosynthesis genes are present. We predicted that another protein family was responsible for the formation of H2NTP in these organisms, and we report here the combination of comparative genomic analysis and experimental validation that led to the identification of a new prokaryote-specific GCYH-I family.
      TABLE 1Distribution of FolE, COG1469, FolK, and FolP homologs in a subset of sequenced genomes The genomes used in the phylogenetic pattern search are in boldface type.
      OrganismFolECOG1469FolKFolP
      E. coli K12+++
      B. subtilis subsp. subtilis strain 168++++
      A. baylyi++++
      Bordetella bronchiseptica RB50+++
      Neisseria meningitidis MC58+++
      Neisseria europaea ATCC 19718+++
      Oceanobacillus iheyensis HTE831+++
      S. aureus subsp. aureus MW2+++
      T. maritima MSB8+++
      Desulfotalea psychrophila LSv54+++
      Desulfuromonas acetoxidans+++
      Exiguobacterium sp. 255-15+++
      Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA+++
      Magnetococcus sp. MC-1+++
      Methylobacillus flagellatus KT+++
      Neisseria lactamica ST-640+++
      Neisseria meningitidis FAM18+++
      Silicibacter sp. TM1040 (B)+++
      Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1+++
      N. gonorrhoeae FA 1090+++
      Geobacter metallireducens GS-15+++
      Idiomarina loihiensis L2TR+++
      Oceanicola batsensis HTCC2597+++
      Rhodobacterales bacterium HTCC2654+++
      Staphylococcus haemolyticus JCSC1435+++
      Thiomicrospira crunogena XCL-2+++
      Sulfitobacter sp. EE-36+++
      Roseovarius nubinhibens ISM (B)+++
      Staphylococcus saprophyticus+++
      Loktanella vestfoldensis SKA53+++
      Roseobacter sp. MED193+++
      Desulfovibrio vulgaris+++

      MATERIALS AND METHODS

      Bioinformatics—Analysis of the folate subsystem was performed in the SEED data base (
      • Overbeek R.
      • Begley T.
      • Butler R.M.
      • Choudhuri J.V.
      • Chuang H.Y.
      • Cohoon M.
      • de Crécy-Lagard V.
      • Diaz N.
      • Disz T.
      • Edwards R.
      • Fonstein M.
      • Frank E.D.
      • Gerdes S.
      • Glass E.M.
      • Goesmann A.
      • Hanson A.
      • Iwata-Reuyl D.
      • Jensen R.
      • Jamshidi N.
      • Krause L.
      • Kubal M.
      • Larsen N.
      • Linke B.
      • McHardy A.C.
      • Meyer F.
      • Neuweger H.
      • Olsen G.
      • Olson R.
      • Osterman A.
      • Portnoy V.
      • Pusch G.D.
      • Rodionov D.A.
      • Ruckert C.
      • Steiner J.
      • Stevens R.
      • Thiele I.
      • Vassieva O.
      • Ye Y.
      • Zagnitko O.
      • Vonstein V.
      ) with SEED version cvs.1144925141 (05:45:41 on April 13, 2006) (available on the World Wide Web at anno-3.nmpdr.org/anno/FIG/index.cgi). Results are made available in the “Folate Biosynthesis Subsystem” on the publicly available server (available on the World Wide Web at theseed.uchicago.edu/FIG/index.cgi). The phylogenetic pattern search was performed on the following SEED server: www.nmpdr.org/FIG/sigs.cgi?SPROUT=1.
      Strains and Growth Conditions—Bacteria were routinely grown in LB medium (BD Diagnostic Systems) at 37 °C. Growth media were solidified with 15 g/liter agar (BD Diagnostic Systems) for the preparation of plates. Transformations and P1 transductions were performed following standard procedures (
      • Miller J.H.
      ,
      • Sambrook J.
      • Fritsch E.F.
      • Maniatis T.
      ). Thymidine (dT; 300 μm), ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (Kan; 50 μg/ml), isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (1 mm), and l-arabinose (0.02-0.2%) were added as required.
      Instrumentation—UV-visible spectroscopy was conducted with a Cary 100 spectrophotometer, fluorescence spectroscopy was carried out with PTI Time-Master fluorometer, liquid scintillation counting was done on a Beckman LS6500 liquid scintillation counter, and mass spectrometry was done on a an LCQ Advantage ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source at the BioAnalytical Shared Resource/Pharmacokinetics Core Facility in the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology at Oregon Health and Science University.
      Cloning of Thermotoga maritima, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Bacillus subtilis COG1469 Genes for Protein Expression—The COG1469 genes from T. maritima (TM0039; GenBank™ accession number gi|15642814), N. gonorrhoeae (ngo0387; GenBank™ accession number gi|59800831), and B. subtilis (yciA; GenBank™ accession number gi|2632620) were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of the respective organisms. The following primers, corresponding to the 5′ and 3′ regions of the gene, were used for PCR amplification: T. maritima sense primer (5′-GGTATTGAGGGTCGCTTGAAGGATGTTCAGAAC-3′), T. maritima antisense primer (5′-AGAGGAGAGTTAGAGCCTCATCCCTCCAGAACG-3′), N. gonorrhoeae sense primer (5′-GGTATTGAGGGTCGCATGAACGCCATTGCAG-3′), N. gonorrhoeae antisense primer (5′-AGAGGAGAGTTAGAGCCCTACGGGTAGGCGATATAG-3′), B. subtilis sense primer (5′-GGTATTGAGGGTCGCATGAATCAACATACGCTGCTCCCG-3′), and B. subtilis antisense primer (5′-AGAGGAGAGTTAGAGCCTCATATTTTATCCAC-3′). Labeled in boldface type are the start and stop codons, and underlined in the sense primer is the Factor Xa site.
      The PCRs contained 500 ng of genomic DNA, 200 μm dNTPs, 50 pmol of the sense and antisense primers, 1× Pfu Ultra buffer (supplied by the manufacturer), and 2.5 units of Pfu Ultra DNA polymerase in a final volume of 50 μl. A three-step PCR thermocycling protocol was utilized: 1) 94 °C for 1 min; 2) 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 50 °C for 2 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; 3) 72 °C for 4 min. The PCR product was purified from a 1% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide using the Qiagen Inc. PCR purification kit and cloned into a linearized pET-30 Xa/LIC expression vector (Novagen). The primary structures of the resulting constructs, pSAB-7-189 (T. maritima), pSAB-8-142 (N. gonorrhoeae), and pSAB-9-61 (B. subtilis), were confirmed by sequencing.
      Cloning of the T. maritima, Acinetobacter baylyi, and B. subtilis COG1469 Genes for Complementation—pTM0039 expressing the TM0039 gene under PBAD control (
      • Klock H.E.
      • White A.
      • Koesema E.
      • Lesley S.A.
      ) was a kind gift of the Joint Center for Structural Genomics (La Jolla, CA). The COG1469 genes from B. subtilis (yciA) and A. baylyi (ACIAD1740 gi|50084892) were cloned in pBAD24 (
      • Guzman L.M.
      • Belin D.
      • Carson M.J.
      • Beckwith J.
      ). The following primers, corresponding to the 5′ and 3′ regions of the gene were used: B. subtilis sense primer (5′-ATTCCATGGATCAACATACGCTGCT-3′), B. subtilis antisense primer (5′-ATTTCTAGATCATATTTTATCCACTTCCTTCG-3′), A. baylyi sense primer (5′-ATTCCATGGATGCTCAACTTCCCGA-3′), and A. baylyi antisense primer (5′-ATTTCTAGATCAAGATGATATTGCAACTGCAA-3′). PCR products were obtained and purified as described above and then digested with NcoI/XbaI before ligation into plasmid pBAD24 (
      • Guzman L.M.
      • Belin D.
      • Carson M.J.
      • Beckwith J.
      ) digested with the same endonucleases and transformed into Topo10 cells (Invitrogen). The primary structures of the resulting constructs, pBY142.1 (expressing A. baylyi ACIAD1740) and pBY143.1 (expressing B. subtilis yciA), were confirmed by sequencing. These plasmids, as well as pBAD24 and pTM0039, were transformed into the E. coli ΔfolE::KanR strain, a kind gift of Dr. Andrew Hanson (University of Florida) (
      • Klaus S.M.
      • Kunji E.R.
      • Bozzo G.G.
      • de la Noiriel A.
      • Garza R.D.
      • Basset G.J.
      • Ravanel S.
      • Rebeille F.
      • Gregory III, J.F.
      • Hanson A.D.
      ). The transformants were plated on LB supplemented with dT, ampicillin, and Kan and screened for the capacity to grow on LB without dT in the presence of various concentrations of arabinose. To confirm the presence of the ΔfolE::KanR allele and of the pBAD derivatives in the transformants, the colonies were analyzed by PCR using the following oligonucleotides located upstream and downstream from the folE gene (ChkDfolE-ol1 (5′-CTCCTTGTTGTGTTGTTTGCAA-3′) and ChkDfolE-ol2 (5′-GGGGCAGCAACATTTGCAGG-3′)) or located upstream and downstream of the polylinker in the pBAD derivatives (pBADrev2 (5′-TTCTGATTTATTCTGTATCAGGC-3′) and pBADol5 (5′-AAGATTAGCGGATCCTACCTG-3′)).
      Purification and Overexpression of Recombinant T. maritima, N. gonorrhoeae, and B. subtilis COG1469 Proteins—The plasmids pSAB-7-189, pSAB-8-142, and pSAB-9-61 were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) for expression of His6 tag fusion proteins. Cultures of the transformed cells were grown at 37 °C with shaking (250 rpm) until an A600 of 0.9 was attained. Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mm, and the cultures were incubated for an additional 4 h at 37°C with shaking (250 rpm). The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The cell paste was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until needed.
      Frozen cell paste was thawed and suspended in lysis buffer (50 mm Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 50 mm KCl, and 1 mm β-mercaptoethanol) at a concentration of 250 mg/ml. The cells were lysed by the addition of lysozyme and DNase to a final concentration of 0.25 mg/ml and 10 μg/ml, respectively. The lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatant was filtered (low protein binding, 0.45 μm). The cell-free extract was loaded onto an Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose column (Qiagen) that had been equilibrated with Buffer A (100 mm Tris-acetate (pH 8.0), 300 mm KCl, 2 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10% glycerol). The column was washed with 5 column volumes of Buffer A, 5 column volumes of Buffer B (100 mm Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 300 mm KCl, 2 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% glycerol, and 20 mm imidazole), and finally 5 column volumes of Buffer C (100 mm Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 300 mm KCl, 2 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and 20 mm imidazole). The protein was eluted from the column with 10 column volumes of Buffer C containing 250 mm imidazole. The protein was concentrated in a Centricon YM-10 ultracentrifugation device and dialyzed at 4 °C against 50 mm Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 50 mm KCl, and 4 mm dithiothreitol.
      The His6 tag was cleaved from the T. maritima, N. gonorrhoeae, and B. subtilis COG1469 proteins in reactions that contained fusion protein (20 mg), Factor Xa protease (20 μg), 50 mm Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 100 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2 in a final volume of 1 ml. After incubating for 20 h at room temperature, the reactions were loaded onto a column containing 2 ml of Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose equilibrated in Buffer A. Wild-type protein was eluted from the column with 10 column volumes of Buffer A. The protein was concentrated and dialyzed against 50 mm Tris acetate (pH 8.0), 50 mm KCl, and 10% glycerol.
      Radiochemical Analysis—The radiochemical release of [14C]formic acid from [8-14C]GTP was conducted according to the methods of Ferre et al. (
      • Ferre J.
      • Yim J.J.
      • Jacobson K.B.
      ) and Burg et al. (
      • Burg A.W.
      • Brown G.M.
      ). Assays were performed at 37 °C (E. coli, N. gonorrhoeae, B. subtilis) or 75°C (T. maritima) in 100 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mm KCl, 2.0 mm MgCl2, 1.0 mm [8-14C]GTP, and 5.0 μm enzyme in a total volume of 250 μl. Aliquots of 50 μl were removed at specific time points and terminated by the addition of 62.5 μl of 0.5 m formic acid. After chilling on ice for 5 min, the samples were loaded onto a column containing 250 μl of charcoal that had been equilibrated in 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). Formate was washed from the column with 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and the eluent was collected and quantified by liquid scintillation counting.
      UV-visible Analysis—Assays were performed in 100 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mm KCl, 2.0 mm MgCl2, 0.1 mm GTP, and 20 μm E. coli FolE, or 40 μm COG1469 enzyme from B. subtilis or N. gonorrhoeae in a volume of 0.5 ml. The reactions were allowed to proceed for 30 min at 37 °C while monitoring the absorbance from 200 to 400 nm (
      • Bracher A.
      • Schramek N.
      • Bacher A.
      ).
      Fluorescence—Assays were performed in 100 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mm KCl, 2.0 mm MgCl2, and either 10 μm E. coli FolE or 40 μm COG1469 enzyme in a total volume of 100 μl. Reactions were initiated with the addition of GTP to a final concentration of 1.0 mm and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C (E. coli, N. gonorrhoeae, B. subtilis) or 75°C (T. maritima). Alkaline phosphatase (5 units) was added, and the reaction mixtures were further incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. To the reactions was then added 12 μl of a 1% I2, 2% KI solution in 1.0 m HCl, and the samples were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 15 min. Excess iodine was reduced by the addition of 6 μl of 2% ascorbic acid. The samples were then analyzed by fluorescence spectroscopy (excitation at 365 nm and emission at 446 nm).
      HPLC Analysis—Assays were performed in 100 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mm KCl, 2.0 mm MgCl2, 1.0 mm GTP, and 60 μm E. coli FolE or 100 μm COG1469 protein in 0.5 ml. Reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 60 min followed by the addition of alkaline phosphatase, and the reactions were incubated an additional 60 min at 37 °C. The reaction products were analyzed by reversed phase HPLC on a Gemini C18 (Phenomex; 250 × 3.90 mm, 5 μm) column equilibrated in 25 mm ammonium acetate (pH 6.0). The column was developed at 1 ml/min with the following solvent gradient: 0-10 min, 0% acetonitrile; 30 min, 4% acetonitrile; 35 min, 50% acetonitrile.
      MS Analysis of GCYH-I Reactions—The preparation of products from GCYH-I reaction assays for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis was carried out in reaction mixtures containing 100 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mm KCl, 2.0 mm MgCl2, 1.0 mm GTP, and either 20 μm E. coli FolE or 40 μm COG1469 from N. gonorrhoeae in a volume of 500 μl. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h in the dark and treated with activated charcoal in a modification of the method of Yim and Brown (
      • Yim J.J.
      • Brown G.M.
      ). After incubating the charcoal-treated reactions at 4 °C for 30 min in the dark, the mixtures were filtered through a Millipore type HA filter (0.45 μm). The filter was washed sequentially with 10 ml of water, 10 ml of 5% ethanol, 10 ml of 50% ethanol containing 3.1% ammonium hydroxide (pH 8.0), and 5 ml of 50% ethanol containing 3.1% ammonium hydroxide (pH 12). The filtrate from the final wash was immediately neutralized with acetic acid. The filtrates were frozen in liquid nitrogen and lyophilized to dryness and then dissolved in 20 mm ammonium acetate (pH 8.0) and 50% methanol and filtered through Millipore Amicon ultrafree-MC spin filters. The filtrates were analyzed by MS with an LCQ Advantage ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source. The ion interface was operated in the negative mode using the following settings: needle voltage of 4.5 kV; sheath and auxiliary gas flow rates of 25 and 3.0 p.s.i., respectively; tube lens voltage of 50 V; capillary voltage of 3.0 V; and capillary temperature of 275 °C. An instrument method was created to scan the range m/z 50-1100. An isocratic LC mobile phase system consisted of methanol and water (pH 9.0) (1:1 by volume) delivered at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. The injection volume was 20-50 μl in aqueous 20 mm ammonium acetate (pH 8.0).

      RESULTS

      Comparative Genomic Analysis of folE—The signature genes of the de novo folate pathway are folP and folK,
      A. Hanson and V. de Crécy-Lagard, unpublished results.
      which encode dihydropteroate synthase and 6-hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase, respectively. All organisms that possess these two genes should have a homolog of the folE gene, since none of the metabolic intermediates, from 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate to 7,8-dihydrohydroxymethylpterin pyrophosphate, are transported in bacteria (
      • Skold O.
      ). Analysis of the distribution of the folE gene among all sequenced genomes that possessed folKP homologs revealed a large class of organisms (Table 1 and supplemental Table 1) that lacked folE homologs, suggesting that folE was “locally missing” (
      • Koonin E.V.
      • Mushegian A.R.
      • Bork P.
      ) in these organisms. Using a SEED tool that allows identification of protein families that follow a defined phylogenetic distribution profile, we searched the available genomes for protein families that were present in organisms that lack folE homologs (Table 1, in boldface type) and absent in E. coli. Five protein families fulfilled those phylogenetic criteria, one of which, COG1469, was of unknown function, and as shown in Fig. 2, members of this family clustered physically with folate metabolism genes in several organisms. The combination of phylogenetic distribution and clustering suggested that the COG1469 family might encode the missing GCYH-I enzyme.
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      FIGURE 2Physical clustering of COG1469 encoding genes with folate biosynthetic genes, such as folK, folP, and folM (an alternative dihydrofolate reductase gene (
      • Giladi M.
      • Altman-Price N.
      • Levin I.
      • Levy L.
      • Mevarech M.
      )).
      COG1469 Genes Complement an E. coli ΔfolE Mutant—Because folate is not transported in most bacteria (
      • Skold O.
      ), it cannot be supplied in the medium to enable growth of a folate auxotroph. However, on rich medium, all of the folate-derived metabolites are present in sufficient quantities except for dT, allowing a ΔfolE mutant to be maintained on LB/dT (
      • Klaus S.M.
      • Kunji E.R.
      • Bozzo G.G.
      • de la Noiriel A.
      • Garza R.D.
      • Basset G.J.
      • Ravanel S.
      • Rebeille F.
      • Gregory III, J.F.
      • Hanson A.D.
      ,
      • Yakhnin H.
      • Babitzke P.
      ). Nevertheless, the E. coli ΔfolE::KanR strain has a slow growth phenotype on LB/dT (colonies take 2 days instead of one to form at 37 °C), presumably due to the absence of formylation of the initiator tRNA. The ΔfolE::KanR strain was transformed with pBAD derivatives expressing the COG1469 homolog from T. maritima (TM0039). Although complementation of both the dT auxotrophy (data not shown) and the slow growth phenotype was observed (Fig. 3C), it was not robust and depended on high arabinose levels. This is not surprising, since T. maritima is a thermophile, and many of the enzymes from thermophiles exhibit low activity at 37 °C. To achieve better complementation, the COG1469 orthologs from the mesophiles B. subtilis and A. baylyi (formally known as Acinetobacter sp. ADP1) were cloned and transformed into the E. coli ΔfolE::KanR strain. Robust complementation of dT auxotrophy (Fig. 3A) and poor growth (Fig. 3B) was observed with these constructs and is consistent with COG1469 family proteins catalyzing GCYH-I activity.
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      FIGURE 3Complementation experiments. Complementation of the dT auxotrophy on LB (A) or the slow growth phenotype on LB dT (B) of the E. coli ΔfolE::KanR by pBAD derivatives expressing the COG1469 genes from B. subtilis (BsfolE2) and A. baylyi (AcfolE2). C, complementation of the slow growth on LB in the presence of dT of the E. coli ΔfolE::KanR by a plasmid expressing TM0039 (TmfolE2). The control is ΔfolE::KanR transformed by pBAD24. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. D, PCR amplification to check for the presence of the ΔfolE::KanR allele (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) and to check for the presence of an insert of the expected size in the pBAD derivatives (lanes 3, 5, 7, and 9) was performed as described under “Materials and Methods” on the ΔfolE::KanR strain transformed with plasmids expressing AcfolE2 (lanes 2 and 3), BsfolE2 (lanes 4 and 5), and TmfolE2 (lanes 6 and 7) and with the pBAD24 control (lanes 8 and 9). The expected size of the PCR product detecting ΔfolE::KanR is about 3.5 kb, whereas the same primers amplify a 2.5-kb product in the wild type strain. The sizes of the PCR products resulting from having AcfolE2, BsfolE2,or TmfolE2 in pBAD24 are 1072, 1105, and 960 bp, respectively.
      COG1469 Proteins Have GCYH-I Activity in Vitro—In parallel with the in vivo experiments, COG1469 genes were cloned into protein expression vectors to allow unambiguous assignment of catalytic function through the direct investigation of putative GTP cyclohydrolase I activity with in vitro enzymatic assays of purified proteins. Thus, the genes encoding COG1469 proteins from T. maritima, N. gonorrhoeae, and B. subtilis were cloned from genomic DNA into the pET30 system, and the recombinant His6 fusion proteins were overproduced and purified. All three of the recombinant proteins were obtained as soluble, active enzymes both as the His6 fusion and the cleaved wild type.
      Radiochemical assays using [8-14C]GTP (
      • Yim J.J.
      • Brown G.M.
      ) of each of the COG1469 proteins, along with E. coli FolE as a positive control, demonstrated that [14C]formate was released in each assay and that its production was both time- and enzyme-dependent (data not shown), consistent with enzyme-catalyzed hydrolytic ring opening and deformylation at C-8 of GTP. From these data, specific activities of 2.3-5.3 nmol min-1 mg-1 were calculated for the COG1469 proteins, roughly an order of magnitude lower than that reported for FolE (
      • Bracher A.
      • Fischer M.
      • Eisenreich W.
      • Ritz H.
      • Schramek N.
      • Boyle P.
      • Gentili P.
      • Huber R.
      • Nar H.
      • Auerbach G.
      • Bacher A.
      ,
      • Rebelo J.
      • Auerbach G.
      • Bader G.
      • Bracher A.
      • Nar H.
      • Hosl C.
      • Schramek N.
      • Kaiser J.
      • Bacher A.
      • Huber R.
      • Fischer M.
      ) and our FolE control. To confirm that the product of the COG1469 catalyzed reactions was in fact 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate, we analyzed the enzyme assays with UV-visible (
      • Bracher A.
      • Schramek N.
      • Bacher A.
      ) and fluorescence (
      • Hatakeyama K.
      • Yoneyama T.
      ) spectroscopy. Shown in Fig. 4A are UV-visible spectra for enzyme assays of E. coli FolE and COG1469 proteins under standard GTP cyclohydrolase I assay conditions. The spectra are essentially identical, with the characteristic absorption spectrum of GTP replaced by that of H2NTP (
      • Bracher A.
      • Schramek N.
      • Bacher A.
      ). When enzyme assays were subjected to postreaction dephosphorylation and oxidation to convert the putative enzymatically produced H2NTP to the fluorescent neopterin, the fluorescent spectra from the COG1469 assays were identical to the spectrum of the E. coli FolE assay (Fig. 4B) and to that of authentic neopterin (
      • Hatakeyama K.
      • Yoneyama T.
      ). Furthermore, HPLC analysis of the enzyme assays after dephosphorylation showed that the product from each enzyme-catalyzed reaction had the same retention time as authentic neopterin (under the analysis conditions dihydroneopterin is oxidized to neopterin) (Fig. 4C). Finally, mass spectrometry analysis of the E. coli FolE and N. gonorrhoeae COG1469 reactions revealed identical constituents, with ions corresponding to GTP (m/z 522, M - H-; m/z 544, M - 2H- + Na+; m/z 566, M - 3H- + 2Na+), neopterin triphosphate (m/z 492, M - H-; under the conditions of the analysis dihydroneopterin is oxidized to neopterin), and neopterin cyclic monophosphate (m/z 314, M - H-; it has been previously documented that under the alkaline conditions of the work-up neopterin triphosphate is converted to the cyclic monophosphate (
      • Basset G.
      • Quinlivan E.P.
      • Ziemak M.J.
      • Diaz De La Garza R.
      • Fischer M.
      • Schiffmann S.
      • Bacher A.
      • Gregory III, J.F.
      • Hanson A.D.
      ,
      • Plowman J.
      • Cone J.E.
      • Guroff G.
      )).
      Figure thumbnail gr4
      FIGURE 4GCYH-I activity assays. A, UV-visible spectra of cyclohydrolase assays. a, E. coli FolE; b, COG1469 protein from N. gonorrhoeae; c, COG1469 protein from B. subtilis; d, no enzyme. B, fluorescence spectra of authentic neopterin and cyclohydrolase assays following postreaction dephosphorylation and oxidation. Fluorescence was measured with excitation at 365 nm. a, T. maritima COG1469; b, B. subtilis COG1469; c, E. coli FolE; d, authentic neopterin; e, N. gonorrhoeae COG1469. C, HPLC chromatograms of authentic neopterin (a) and cyclohydrolase assays with E. coli FolE (b), B. subtilis COG1469 added to authentic neopterin (c), and B. subtilis COG1469 alone (d). Enzyme assays were subjected to postreaction dephosphorylation and oxidation.
      Taken together, the data clearly demonstrate that the COG1469 proteins catalyze GTP cyclohydrolase I activity, and thus they represent a new structural class of GTP cyclohydrolase enzymes, distinct from the canonical GCYH-I enzyme exemplified by human and E. coli FolE. To differentiate these two cyclohydrolase families, we propose that the canonical type I cyclohydrolase be renamed GCYH-IA, that the COG1469 family be named GCYH-IB, and that their corresponding genes be denoted as folE and folE2, respectively.

      DISCUSSION

      Phylogenetic Distribution of folE and folE2 Genes—The role of folate as an essential cofactor, coupled with the historical importance of the pathway in the development of antibacterial, antiparasitic, and anticancer therapies (
      • Hoffbrand A.V.
      • Weir D.G.
      ), has led to folate metabolism being an especially well characterized area of biology. Thus, the discovery of a novel, widely distributed folate biosynthetic enzyme is a particularly compelling illustration of the power of comparative genomic approaches to link genes and function.
      We analyzed the distribution of the folE/folE2 genes among all sequenced organisms in the SEED data base (26 archaeal, 363 bacterial, and 29 eukaryal more or less complete genomes). No FolE2 homolog is present to this date in any of the eukaryotic genomes, and as shown in supplemental Table 1, there is significant variation in the distribution of the folE/folE2 genes among bacteria. The first and largest group, which includes E. coli, has only a folE homolog. A second group, which includes Staphylococcus aureus and N. gonorrhoeae, has only a folE2 homolog. A third group, including B. subtilis and A. baylyi, has a homolog of each gene, whereas a fourth group can possess multiple copies of the two genes (e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa has two folE genes and one folE2 gene). The need for several genes encoding type I cyclohydrolase enzymes in many organisms is still not clear, but it may be due to differential expression under specific environmental conditions or their involvement in pathways other than folate biosynthesis; for example, a GTP cyclohydrolase has been implicated in the biosynthesis of 7-deazaguanosine derivatives, such as the modified tRNA nucleoside queuosine (
      • Kuchino Y.
      • Kasai H.
      • Nihei K.
      • Nishimura S.
      ) and the secondary metabolites toyocamycin and tubercidin (
      • Suhadolnik R.J.
      • Uematsu T.
      ,
      • Smulson M.E.
      • Suhadolnik R.J.
      ). In B. subtilis, it has been shown that the yciA gene is not essential (
      • Gaballa A.
      • Wang T.
      • Ye R.W.
      • Helmann J.D.
      ), as expected because a folE gene (mtrA) (
      • Yakhnin H.
      • Babitzke P.
      ) is also present in this organism. No folE2 deletions are available in bacteria that do not have another identified folE gene; construction of the corresponding S. aureus mutant is currently under way.
      Most archaeal genomes possess either a folE or a folE2 homolog (see supplemental Table 1). Several GTP-derived metabolites are synthesized in Archaea, including folate in the halophiles and Sulfolobii (
      • White R.H.
      ), tetrahydromethanopterin in the methanogens (
      • Graham D.E.
      • Xu H.
      • White R.H.
      ), and the 7-deazaguanosine tRNA-modified nucleoside archaeosine (
      • Gregson J.M.
      • Crain P.F.
      • Edmonds C.G.
      • Gupta R.
      • Hashizume T.
      • Phillipson D.W.
      • McCloskey J.A.
      ), which is found in the majority of archaeal tRNA. The archaeal folE/folE2 genes may be involved in one or more of these biosynthetic pathways.
      Structural Prediction of COG1469 Proteins—The primary structure of COG1469 proteins presents no homology to any other known protein family. Direct alignment of COG1469 and GCYH-IA sequences yields no detectable similarity. However, protein fold recognition analysis using one- and three-dimensional sequence profiles, coupled with secondary structure and solvation potential information (using the 3D-PSSM server available on the World Wide Web at www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~3dpssm/index2.html (
      • Kelley L.A.
      • MacCallum R.M.
      • Sternberg M.J.
      )), indicates potential three-dimensional structural homology with two tunnel-fold (T-fold) enzymes, a structural superfamily of enzymes that includes GCYH-IA (
      • Colloc'h N.
      • Poupon A.
      • Mornon J.P.
      ). T-fold enzymes bind planar purine and pterin-like substrates but catalyze disparate reactions (
      • Colloc'h N.
      • Poupon A.
      • Mornon J.P.
      ), and although they characteristically exhibit low sequence homology, their tertiary structural homology is very high. Using the N. gonorrhoeae sequence as a bait, the N-terminal half of COG1469 is most similar in predicted tertiary structure to 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate epimerase (Protein Data Bank code 1B9L (
      • Ploom T.
      • Haussmann C.
      • Hof P.
      • Steinbacher S.
      • Bacher A.
      • Richardson J.
      • Huber R.
      ), PSSM E value 0.39), whereas the C-terminal half is similar to 7,8-dihydroneopterin aldolase (DHNA; Protein Data Bank code 1NBU (
      • Goulding C.W.
      • Apostol M.I.
      • Sawaya M.R.
      • Phillips M.
      • Parseghian A.
      • Eisenberg D.
      ), PSSM E value 0.3) (Fig. 5A). These were the only PSSM hits with a qualifying E value (i.e. lower than the detection threshold E value of 1.00). Both hits are folate biosynthetic enzymes with homo-octameric structures. When aligned with the predicted fold of COG1469, the two enzymes exhibit comparable low overall sequence identities (10%) and similarities (23%) with the COG1469 family, consistent with the low sequence homology observed within the T-fold superfamily in general (
      • Colloc'h N.
      • Poupon A.
      • Mornon J.P.
      ). Both the size of COG1469 proteins (∼250-300 amino acids) and the fact that two T-fold domains can be detected in their sequences suggest that COG1469 members belong to the bimodular subfamily of the T-fold superfamily, which includes urate oxidase (
      • el Colloc'h N.
      • Hajji M.
      • Bachet B.
      • Schiltz M.
      • Prange T.
      • Castro B.
      • Mornon J.P.
      • L'Hermite G.
      ), the plant GCYH-IA enzyme (
      • Basset G.
      • Quinlivan E.P.
      • Ziemak M.J.
      • Diaz De La Garza R.
      • Fischer M.
      • Schiffmann S.
      • Bacher A.
      • Gregory III, J.F.
      • Hanson A.D.
      ), and the novel nitrile oxidoreductase (class 2; e.g. YqcD from E. coli) recently reported (
      • Van Lanen S.G.
      • Reader J.S.
      • Swairjo M.A.
      • de Crécy-Lagard V.
      • Lee B.
      • Iwata-Reuyl D.
      ). Preliminary sedimentation velocity and crystallographic analyses of N. gonorrhoeae GCYH-IB suggest either a trimeric or a tetrameric quaternary structure (data not shown).
      Figure thumbnail gr5
      FIGURE 5Similarity of GCYH-IB to T-fold enzymes. A, domain organization of GCYH-IB family and other T-fold enzymes GCYH-IA, 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate epimerase, and DHNA. B, ClustalW alignment of GCYH-IB sequences in the C-terminal half (6 of 30 aligned sequences are shown) and their fold-based alignment with E. coli GCYH-IA and Mycobacterium tuberculosis DHNA. Secondary structure elements from the GCYH-IA and DHNA crystal structures are shown above and below the sequences, respectively. The red boxes indicate conserved residues in all three enzyme families. The invariant Glu is highlighted in red. Zinc binding and catalytic residues in GCYH-IA are highlighted in yellow and cyan, respectively. Black boxes indicate conserved residues in GCYH-IB predicted to be involved in catalysis and/or metal binding based on their predicted spatial homology to active site residues of GCYH-IA and DHNA. Ec, E. coli; Bs, B. subtilis; Sa, S. aureus; Pa, Pyrococcus abyssi; Ap, Aeropyrum pernix; Tm, T. maritima; Ng, N. gonorrhoeae; Mt, M. tuberculosis.
      Based on a superposition of the predicted tertiary structure of GCYH-IB with the crystal structure of E. coli GCYH-IA (
      • Nar H.
      • Huber R.
      • Auerbach G.
      • Fischer M.
      • Hosl C.
      • Ritz H.
      • Bracher A.
      • Meining W.
      • Eberhardt S.
      • Bacher A.
      ) and that of DHNA (
      • Goulding C.W.
      • Apostol M.I.
      • Sawaya M.R.
      • Phillips M.
      • Parseghian A.
      • Eisenberg D.
      ), a sequence alignment of the C-terminal half of GCYH-IB with GCYH-IA could be generated (Fig. 5B). The alignment reveals ∼16% sequence similarity between the two GCYH-I families and shows that the GCYH-IB family contains the conserved Glu characteristic of the substrate-binding pocket of GCYH-IA enzymes (Glu152, E. coli numbering) and T-fold enzymes in general (
      • Colloc'h N.
      • Poupon A.
      • Mornon J.P.
      ). In GCYH-IA, two conserved motifs, CEHH and HXC, contain the zinc-coordinating and catalytic residues and are separated by ∼70 residues. These motifs are missing from GCYH-IB sequences and are replaced by CP-C/H/S-A/S and ESXHXH, which are separated by ∼100 residues (e.g. Cys146-Pro147-Cys148-Ser149-Xaa93-Glu242-Ser243-Ile244-His245-Asn246-His247 in N. gonorrhoeae residue numbers). Although in some organisms the two motifs in GCYH-IB collectively lack only a single cysteine or histidine to the putative active site, in other organisms the combined motifs lack both a cysteine and a histidine. Furthermore, the locations of specific residues are different, both in primary sequence and deduced three-dimensional structure, and an additional conserved sequence, HXQ-R/K (His158-Asn159-Gln160-Arg161 in N. gonorrhoeae residue numbers), is found in GCYH-IB but not in GCYH-IA. The corresponding region in the structures of GCYH-IA and other T-fold enzymes is located near the active sites, suggesting a possible role for these residues in the catalytic function of GCYH-IB.
      Mechanistic Implications of the Structural Divergence of GCYH-IA and -IB Enzymes—Of the enzymes involved in folate and biopterin biosynthesis, GCYH-IA has attracted particular attention (
      • Nar H.
      • Huber R.
      • Auerbach G.
      • Fischer M.
      • Hosl C.
      • Ritz H.
      • Bracher A.
      • Meining W.
      • Eberhardt S.
      • Bacher A.
      ,
      • Wolf W.A.
      • Brown G.M.
      ) due to the mechanistic complexity inherent in the conversion of GTP to H2NTP. GCYH-IA activity is dependent on a catalytic Zn2+ atom (
      • Auerbach G.
      • Herrmann A.
      • Bracher A.
      • Bader G.
      • Gutlich M.
      • Fischer M.
      • Neukamm M.
      • Garrido-Franco M.
      • Richardson J.
      • Nar H.
      • Huber R.
      • Bacher A.
      ), which functions as a Lewis acid in activating a water molecule for nucleophilic attack at C-8 of GTP in the initial hydrolytic step of the reaction. The Zn2+ further serves to facilitate nucleophilic attack of the second water molecule by polarizing the resulting amide carbonyl. The zinc-binding site in GCYH-IA is made up of Cys110, His113, and Cys181 (E. coli numbering), with water occupying the fourth coordination site. As noted above, the zinc site is disrupted in GCYH-IB members, with His113 and Cys181 replaced by Ser/Ala and His, respectively, suggesting that metal binding is substantially different or abolished in the GCYH-IB enzymes. His112, which has been identified as a key residue in opening and rearrangement of the ribose ring in GCYH-IA (
      • Rebelo J.
      • Auerbach G.
      • Bader G.
      • Bracher A.
      • Nar H.
      • Hosl C.
      • Schramek N.
      • Kaiser J.
      • Bacher A.
      • Huber R.
      • Fischer M.
      ,
      • Tanaka Y.
      • Nakagawa N.
      • Kuramitsu S.
      • Yokoyama S.
      • Masui R.
      ), can be His/Cys/Ser in GCYH-IB, indicating that the latter steps of the reaction may also be catalyzed differently by the GCYH-IB enzymes.
      The sequence of the GCYH-IB enzymes and resulting structural predictions are consistent with an active site architecture that is, minimally, much different from that in GCYH-IA, potentially involving a change in metal ion binding. We are actively investigating these issues using both biochemical and structural approaches and hope to resolve these questions in the near future. It further remains to be seen whether the apparent differences in the active site architecture of the type 1A and 1B enzymes can be exploited for the design of selective inhibitors of the type 1B enzymes; realization of such a goal would add yet another chapter to the therapeutic importance of the folate pathway.

      Acknowledgments

      We thank Scott Leslie (Joint Center for Structural Genomics) for the pTM0039 plasmid, Andrei Osterman (Burnham Institute) for insightful discussions, Ross Overbeek (The Fellowship for Integration of Genomes) for help with phylogenetic profile searches, and Andrew Hanson (University of Florida) for the E. coli ΔfolE strain.

      Supplementary Material

      References

        • Nichol C.A.
        • Smith G.K.
        • Duch D.S.
        Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1985; 54: 729-764
        • Clark B.F.
        • Marcker K.A.
        J. Mol. Biol. 1966; 17: 394-406
        • Hanson A.D.
        • Gregory J.F.
        • II I
        Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002; 5: 244-249
        • Green J.C.
        • Nichols B.P.
        • Matthews R.G.
        Neidhart F.C. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.1996: 665-673
        • Cossins E.A.
        • Chen L.
        Phytochemistry. 1997; 45: 437-452
        • Lucock M.
        Mol. Genet. Metab. 2000; 71: 121-138
        • Huovinen P.
        • Sundström L.
        • Swedberg G.
        • Sköld O.
        Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995; 39: 279-289
        • Katzenmeier G.
        • Schmid C.
        • Kellermann J.
        • Lottspeich F.
        • Bacher A.
        Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler. 1991; 372: 991-997
        • Schoedon G.
        • Redweik U.
        • Frank G.
        • Cotton R.G.
        • Blau N.
        Eur. J. Biochem. 1992; 210: 561-568
        • Yim J.J.
        • Brown G.M.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1976; 251: 5087-5094
        • Thony B.
        • Auerbach G.
        • Blau N.
        Biochem. J. 2000; 347: 1-16
        • Bonafe L.
        • Thony B.
        • Penzien J.M.
        • Czarnecki B.
        • Blau N.
        Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001; 69: 269-277
        • Klaus S.M.
        • Wegkamp A.
        • Sybesma W.
        • Hugenholtz J.
        • Gregory 3rd, J.F.
        • Hanson A.D.
        J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280: 5274-5280
        • Overbeek R.
        • Begley T.
        • Butler R.M.
        • Choudhuri J.V.
        • Chuang H.Y.
        • Cohoon M.
        • de Crécy-Lagard V.
        • Diaz N.
        • Disz T.
        • Edwards R.
        • Fonstein M.
        • Frank E.D.
        • Gerdes S.
        • Glass E.M.
        • Goesmann A.
        • Hanson A.
        • Iwata-Reuyl D.
        • Jensen R.
        • Jamshidi N.
        • Krause L.
        • Kubal M.
        • Larsen N.
        • Linke B.
        • McHardy A.C.
        • Meyer F.
        • Neuweger H.
        • Olsen G.
        • Olson R.
        • Osterman A.
        • Portnoy V.
        • Pusch G.D.
        • Rodionov D.A.
        • Ruckert C.
        • Steiner J.
        • Stevens R.
        • Thiele I.
        • Vassieva O.
        • Ye Y.
        • Zagnitko O.
        • Vonstein V.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33: 5691-5702
        • Miller J.H.
        Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY1972
        • Sambrook J.
        • Fritsch E.F.
        • Maniatis T.
        Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY1989
        • Klock H.E.
        • White A.
        • Koesema E.
        • Lesley S.A.
        J. Struct. Funct. Genomics. 2005; 6: 89-94
        • Guzman L.M.
        • Belin D.
        • Carson M.J.
        • Beckwith J.
        J. Bacteriol. 1995; 177: 4121-4130
        • Klaus S.M.
        • Kunji E.R.
        • Bozzo G.G.
        • de la Noiriel A.
        • Garza R.D.
        • Basset G.J.
        • Ravanel S.
        • Rebeille F.
        • Gregory III, J.F.
        • Hanson A.D.
        J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280: 38457-38463
        • Ferre J.
        • Yim J.J.
        • Jacobson K.B.
        J. Chromatogr. 1986; 357: 283-292
        • Burg A.W.
        • Brown G.M.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1968; 243: 2349-2358
        • Bracher A.
        • Schramek N.
        • Bacher A.
        Biochemistry. 2001; 40: 7896-7902
        • Skold O.
        Drug Resist. Update. 2000; 3: 155-160
        • Koonin E.V.
        • Mushegian A.R.
        • Bork P.
        Trends Genet. 1996; 12: 334-336
        • Yakhnin H.
        • Babitzke P.
        Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004; 64: 382-386
        • Hatakeyama K.
        • Yoneyama T.
        Methods Mol. Biol. 1998; 100: 265-272
        • Van Lanen S.G.
        • Reader J.S.
        • Swairjo M.A.
        • de Crécy-Lagard V.
        • Lee B.
        • Iwata-Reuyl D.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005; 102: 4264-4269
        • Bracher A.
        • Fischer M.
        • Eisenreich W.
        • Ritz H.
        • Schramek N.
        • Boyle P.
        • Gentili P.
        • Huber R.
        • Nar H.
        • Auerbach G.
        • Bacher A.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 16727-16735
        • Rebelo J.
        • Auerbach G.
        • Bader G.
        • Bracher A.
        • Nar H.
        • Hosl C.
        • Schramek N.
        • Kaiser J.
        • Bacher A.
        • Huber R.
        • Fischer M.
        J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 326: 503-516
        • Basset G.
        • Quinlivan E.P.
        • Ziemak M.J.
        • Diaz De La Garza R.
        • Fischer M.
        • Schiffmann S.
        • Bacher A.
        • Gregory III, J.F.
        • Hanson A.D.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 12489-12494
        • Plowman J.
        • Cone J.E.
        • Guroff G.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1974; 249: 5559-5564
        • Hoffbrand A.V.
        • Weir D.G.
        Br. J. Haematol. 2001; 113: 579-589
        • Kuchino Y.
        • Kasai H.
        • Nihei K.
        • Nishimura S.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 1976; 3: 393-398
        • Suhadolnik R.J.
        • Uematsu T.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1970; 245: 4365-4371
        • Smulson M.E.
        • Suhadolnik R.J.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1967; 242: 2872-2876
        • Gaballa A.
        • Wang T.
        • Ye R.W.
        • Helmann J.D.
        J. Bacteriol. 2002; 184: 6508-6514
        • White R.H.
        J. Bacteriol. 1988; 170: 4608-4612
        • Graham D.E.
        • Xu H.
        • White R.H.
        Biochemistry. 2002; 41: 15074-15084
        • Gregson J.M.
        • Crain P.F.
        • Edmonds C.G.
        • Gupta R.
        • Hashizume T.
        • Phillipson D.W.
        • McCloskey J.A.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 10076-10086
        • Kelley L.A.
        • MacCallum R.M.
        • Sternberg M.J.
        J. Mol. Biol. 2000; 299: 499-520
        • Colloc'h N.
        • Poupon A.
        • Mornon J.P.
        Proteins. 2000; 39: 142-154
        • Ploom T.
        • Haussmann C.
        • Hof P.
        • Steinbacher S.
        • Bacher A.
        • Richardson J.
        • Huber R.
        Structure. 1999; 7: 509-516
        • Goulding C.W.
        • Apostol M.I.
        • Sawaya M.R.
        • Phillips M.
        • Parseghian A.
        • Eisenberg D.
        J. Mol. Biol. 2005; 349: 61-72
        • el Colloc'h N.
        • Hajji M.
        • Bachet B.
        • Schiltz M.
        • Prange T.
        • Castro B.
        • Mornon J.P.
        • L'Hermite G.
        Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997; 4: 947-952
        • Nar H.
        • Huber R.
        • Auerbach G.
        • Fischer M.
        • Hosl C.
        • Ritz H.
        • Bracher A.
        • Meining W.
        • Eberhardt S.
        • Bacher A.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995; 92: 12120-12125
        • Tanaka Y.
        • Nakagawa N.
        • Kuramitsu S.
        • Yokoyama S.
        • Masui R.
        J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 2005; 138: 263-275
        • Wolf W.A.
        • Brown G.M.
        Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1969; 192: 468-478
        • Auerbach G.
        • Herrmann A.
        • Bracher A.
        • Bader G.
        • Gutlich M.
        • Fischer M.
        • Neukamm M.
        • Garrido-Franco M.
        • Richardson J.
        • Nar H.
        • Huber R.
        • Bacher A.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 13567-13572
        • Giladi M.
        • Altman-Price N.
        • Levin I.
        • Levy L.
        • Mevarech M.
        J. Bacteriol. 2003; 185: 7015-7018