Advertisement
MEMBRANE TRANSPORT STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOGENESIS| Volume 276, ISSUE 42, P39150-39160, October 19, 2001

The Coatomer-interacting Protein Dsl1p Is Required for Golgi-to-Endoplasmic Reticulum Retrieval in Yeast*

Open AccessPublished:October 19, 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M105833200
      Sec22p is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi v-SNARE protein whose retrieval from the Golgi compartment to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is mediated by COPI vesicles. Whether Sec22p exhibits its primary role at the ER or the Golgi apparatus is still a matter of debate. To determine the role of Sec22p in intracellular transport more precisely, we performed a synthetic lethality screen. We isolated mutant yeast strains in which SEC22 gene function, which in a wild type strain background is non-essential for cell viability, has become essential. In this way a novel temperature-sensitive mutant allele, dsl1-22, of the essential gene DSL1 was obtained. The dsl1-22mutation causes severe defects in Golgi-to-ER retrieval of ER-resident SNARE proteins and integral membrane proteins harboring a C-terminal KKXX retrieval motif, as well as of the soluble ER protein BiP/Kar2p, which utilizes the HDEL receptor, Erd2p, for its recycling to the ER. DSL1 interacts genetically with mutations that affect components of the Golgi-to-ER recycling machinery, namely sec20-1, tip20-5, and COPI-encoding genes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Dsl1p is a peripheral membrane protein, which in vitro specifically binds to coatomer, the major component of the protein coat of COPI vesicles.
      ER
      endoplasmic reticulum
      HDEL
      C-terminal motif of histidine-aspartate-glutamate-leucine
      α
      α-factor pheromone
      COP
      coat protein
      DAPI
      4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
      GFP
      green fluorescent protein
      GST
      glutathione S-transferase
      SDS-PAGE
      sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
      Sec22-α
      α-factor-tagged Sec22 protein
      SNARE
      receptor for SNAPs
      Ts mutant
      temperature-sensitive mutant
      ORF
      open reading frame
      5-FOA
      5-fluoroorotic acid
      PDI
      protein disulfide isomerase
      Membrane-bound compartments in eukaryotic cells can fuse directly as shown for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 and mitotic Golgi fragments as well as endosomal and lysosomal compartments (homotypic fusion; see Ref.
      • Rothman J.E.
      • Warren G.
      ). However, vectorial transport between distinct compartments mainly involves small coated vesicles whose formation from the donor membrane is mediated by proteinaceous coats, either COPI, COPII, or clathrin. After uncoating, vesicles fuse selectively with an acceptor membrane (heterotypic fusion; see Ref.
      • Schekman R.
      • Orci L.
      ). Both homotypic and heterotypic fusion events rely on specific attachment reactions to guarantee that only appropriate membranes can mix. The membrane attachment itself consists of two steps, tethering and docking, involving different sets of proteins (
      • Cao X.C.
      • Ballew N.
      • Barlowe C.
      ,
      • Guo W.
      • Sacher M.
      • Barrowman J.
      • Ferro-Novick S.
      • Novick P.
      ). Tethering factors are peripherally membrane-associated protein complexes consisting of up to 10 different subunits, which share little sequence similarity.
      The subsequent docking stage involves specific sets of membrane-anchored proteins, so-called SNARE proteins (SNARE issoluble NSF (forN-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein)attachment protein receptor) (
      • Söllner T.
      • Whitehart S.W.
      • Brunner M.
      • Erdjument-Bromage H.
      • Geromanos S.
      • Tempst P.
      • Rothman J.E.
      ,
      • Søgaard M.
      • Tani K.
      • Ye R.R.
      • Geromanos S.
      • Tempst P.
      • Kirchhausen T.
      • Rothman J.E.
      • Söllner T.
      ,
      • Götte M.
      • Fischer von Mollard G.
      ). SNAREs are inserted into the membrane either by a C-terminal transmembrane domain or through lipid moieties attached to C-terminal cysteine residues. In contrast to the tethering factors, all known SNARE proteins are members of either of three protein families: the syntaxins, the synaptobrevins or VAMPs, and the SNAP-25 family members. To induce membrane fusion, SNARE proteins from apposed membranes must interact intrans. The formation of a stable four-helix bundle may generate enough energy to promote mixing of the lipid bilayer (
      • Hanson P.I.
      • Roth R.
      • Morisaki H.
      • Jahn R.
      • Heuser J.E.
      ,
      • Sutton R.B.
      • Fasshauer D.
      • Jahn R.
      • Brunger A.T.
      ,
      • Weber T.
      • Zemelman B.V.
      • Mcnew J.A.
      • Westermann B.
      • Gmachl M.
      • Parlati F.
      • Söllner T.H.
      • Rothman J.E.
      ).
      Lipid mixing experiments using SNARE complexes reconstituted into lipid bilayer vesicles indicated that only cognate SNARE combinations are able to induce fusion (
      • McNew J.A.
      • Parlati F.
      • Fukuda R.
      • Johnston R.J.
      • Paz K.
      • Paumet F.
      • Söllner T.H.
      • Rothman J.E.
      ). However, SNARE proteins are rather promiscuous when the formation of the tight SDS or heat-resistant SNARE complexes is analyzed (
      • Yang B.
      • Gonzalez L.
      • Prekeris R.
      • Steegmaier M.
      • Advani R.J.
      • Scheller R.H.
      ,
      • Fasshauer D.
      • Antonin W.
      • Margittai M.
      • Pabst S.
      • Jahn R.
      ). Moreover, SNARE proteins can be part of more than one SNARE complex in vivo (
      • Nichols B.J.
      • Pelham H.R.
      ), and some SNARE proteins can functionally replace each other (
      • Götte M.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ,
      • Darsow T.
      • Rieder S.E.
      • Emr S.D.
      ). In vitro the synaptobrevin/VAMP homologs Snc1p and Snc2p in yeast can be replaced by two other members of the synaptobrevin family, the ER-Golgi SNARE Sec22p and the vacuolar SNARE Nyv1p (
      • McNew J.A.
      • Parlati F.
      • Fukuda R.
      • Johnston R.J.
      • Paz K.
      • Paumet F.
      • Söllner T.H.
      • Rothman J.E.
      ). However, these SNAREs are unable to replace Snc1/2p in vivo (
      • Grote E.
      • Vlacich G.
      • Pypaert M.
      • Novick P.J.
      ), probably because they are retained in their specific compartments. Thus, the targeting of SNAREs to the right compartment is one way to increase the specificity of intracellular membrane attachment/fusion events.
      We analyzed previously (
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ) the targeting of the ER-to-Golgi SNARE Sec22p and show that the correct targeting of Sec22p involves its recycling from the Golgi to the ER via COPI-coated vesicles. In this respect, Sec22p as well as Bos1p (
      • Ossipov D.
      • Schröder-Köhne S.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ) behave like ER-resident proteins that carry a KKXX ER-retrieval signal (
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ). The coat of COPI vesicles in mammalian cells and yeast consists of seven subunits (α-, β-, β′-, γ-, δ-, ε-, and ζ-COP) and the small GTPase, ARF1 (
      • Wieland F.
      • Harter C.
      ).
      The observations made by Letourneur et al. (
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ) and Cossonet al. (
      • Cosson P.
      • Démollière C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Duden R.
      • Letourneur F.
      ) that KKXX-tagged proteins require COPI components for retrieval from Golgi to the ER provided first evidence that COPI vesicles mediate this retrograde transport. The same is true not only for Sec22p but also for other yeast proteins that recycle from Golgi to ER, for example, Emp47p, a Golgi lectin-like protein; Erd2p, the HDEL receptor; Sed5p, a Golgi-localized syntaxin homolog; and Mnn1p, a glycosyltransferase (
      • Schröder-Köhne S.
      • Letourneur F.
      • Riezman H.
      ,
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Todorow Z.
      • Spang A.
      • Carmack E.
      • Yates J.
      • Schekman R.
      ,
      • Dogic D.
      • Dubois A.
      • de Chassey B.
      • Lefkir Y.
      • Letourneur F.
      ). How Sec22p is sorted into COPI vesicles is currently unknown. Moreover, the function of Sec22p is not entirely understood. The SEC22gene was first isolated by us as a multicopy suppressor of defects in the small GTPase Ypt1p involved in ER-to-Golgi transport (namedSLY2; see Ref.
      • Dascher C.
      • Ossig R.
      • Gallwitz D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ). Later SLY2 was found to be identical to SEC22 (
      • Newman A.P.
      • Graf J.
      • Mancini P.
      • Rossi G.
      • Lian J.P.
      • Ferro-Novick S.
      ) for which conditional mutant alleles had been identified by Novick et al. (
      • Novick P.
      • Field C.
      • Schekman R.
      ). Like several other SNARE proteins, Sec22p can be a component of more than just one SNARE complex. Its physical interaction with the SNARE proteins Sed5p, Bos1p, Bet1p, and other Golgi SNARE proteins argues for a role in anterograde traffic from ER-to-Golgi (
      • Søgaard M.
      • Tani K.
      • Ye R.R.
      • Geromanos S.
      • Tempst P.
      • Kirchhausen T.
      • Rothman J.E.
      • Söllner T.
      ,
      • Lian J.P.
      • Stone S.
      • Jiang Y.
      • Lyons P.
      • Ferro-Novick S.
      ,
      • Tsui M.M.
      • Tai W.C.
      • Banfield D.K.
      ). Sec22p also co-precipitates with the ER proteins Ufe1p and Sec20p that function in retrograde Golgi-ER transport (
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Rayner J.C.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Cosson P.
      • Schröder-Köhne S.
      • Sweet D.S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Frigerio G.
      • Letourneur F.
      ). sec22 mutants lead to a defect in forward traffic (
      • Novick P.
      • Ferro S.
      • Schekman R.
      ,
      • Newman A.P.
      • Shim J.
      • Ferro-Novick S.
      ,
      • Kaiser C.A.
      • Schekman R.
      ,
      • Ossig R.
      • Dascher C.
      • Trepte H.H.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ). However, this defect, as with many other mutants affected in retrograde transport, could be a secondary effect. In vitro assays performed with permeabilized mutant cells showed that the sec22-3 mutation does not slow down forward transport but does inhibit retrograde transport (
      • Spang A.
      • Schekman R.
      ,
      • Cao X.
      • Barlowe C.
      ). Membrane fusion reconstituted with liposomes containing the ER-to-Golgi SNARE Bet1p requires the presence of Sec22p along with Sed5p and Bos1p on the opposing membranes to drive fusion (
      • McNew J.A.
      • Parlati F.
      • Fukuda R.
      • Johnston R.J.
      • Paz K.
      • Paumet F.
      • Söllner T.H.
      • Rothman J.E.
      ,
      • Fukuda R.
      • McNew J.A.
      • Weber T.
      • Parlati F.
      • Engel T.
      • Nickel W.
      • Rothman J.E.
      • Söllner T.H.
      ). In mammalian cells the Sec22p homolog sec22b coprecipitates with syntaxin 5 (∼Sed5p), rbet1 (∼Bet1p), and membrin (∼Bos1p) (
      • Xu D.
      • Joglekar A.P.
      • Williams A.L.
      • Hay J.C.
      ) as well as syntaxin 18, which may be functionally equivalent to Ufe1p (
      • Hatsuzawa K.
      • Hirose H.
      • Tani K.
      • Yamamoto A.
      • Scheller R.H.
      • Tagaya M.
      ). Therefore, the dual function of Sec22p may be conserved throughout evolution.
      To obtain additional clues to the function of Sec22p, we used a genetic approach. SEC22 is not essential for cell viability (
      • Dascher C.
      • Ossig R.
      • Gallwitz D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ). We tried to find mutant yeast strains in which SEC22 became essential. A new allele of yeast ORF YNL258c showed synthetic lethality with sec22Δ. Mutants inYNL258c were recently shown to be dependent on a dominant allele of SLY1, a suppressor of many ER-to-Golgi transport defects, and the gene was named DSL1 (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ). Evidence was provided for a function of Dsl1p in ER-to-Golgi forward transport. Genetic interaction of some dsl1 mutants with the γ-COP-encoding SEC21 gene also suggested a role of Dsl1p in retrograde Golgi-to-ER traffic (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ). We show that a new allele ofDSL1, dsl1-22, isolated in our screen indeed affects Golgi-to-ER retrieval of several proteins with only slight effects on forward transport. dsl1-22 interacts genetically with factors required for retrograde traffic, and Dsl1p binds coatomer. Taken together, our data provide strong evidence for a direct role of Dsl1p in Golgi-to-ER traffic.

      EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

      Yeast Strains, Genetic Techniques, and Plasmids

      Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used are listed in Table I. Cells were grown in yeast extract/peptone/dextrose or synthetic minimal medium containing galactose (2%) or glucose (2%) as carbon sources and supplemented as necessary with 20 mg/liter tryptophan, histidine, adenine, uracil or 30 mg/liter leucine or lysine. To enhance the visualization of sectoring colonies, plates with low adenine concentration (10 mg/liter adenine) were prepared. 5-FOA plates were prepared as synthetic minimal medium containing 0.1% 5-FOA. Yeast transformations were performed as described previously (
      • Elble R.
      ). Standard techniques were used for mating of haploid strains, complementation analysis, sporulation, and the analysis of tetrads (
      • Sherman F.
      • Fink G.R.
      • Hicks J.B.
      ). The assay to detect retention defects using Ste2-Wbp1p was described previously (
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ,
      • Boehm J.
      • Letourneur F.
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Démollière C.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ). The analysis of synthetic lethal effects between thedsl1-22 mutation and other ER-Golgi defects was performed with strains derived from the original mutant by three crosses to wild type strains or a dsl1-22-myc::KanMX strain derived from the original transformant by two crosses to wild type strains. When possible tetrad analysis was performed 2 or 3 days after placing diploid cells on potassium acetate plates. The viability of spores varied considerably. Therefore, the genotype of viable spores was determined by crosses to tester strains (complementation assays). The dsl1-22-myc::KanMX carrying spores were identified by their resistance to G418. 98% of the possibledsl1-22, sec23-1, mutants, 80% of the possibledsl1-22, bet1-1 double mutants, 64% of the dsl1-22, sec27-1, 47% of the dsl1-22, sec22-3, 36% of thedsl1-22, sed5-1, and 28% of the dsl1-22, bos1(sec31-1) double mutants could form colonies. The viability of dsl1-22 single mutants in these tetrads was higher than 90%. No double mutants were obtained when we tried to combine thedsl1-22 defect with the sec20-1,sec21-1, tip20-5, ret1-1, andret1-1. An unexpected result was the very low viability of all dsl1-22 spores derived from a diploid heterozygous fordsl1-22 and sly1ts.
      Table IYeast strains
      StrainGenotypeSource
      BSH-7CMATα, ura3, trp1, his3, suc2-Δ9, bet1-1This laboratory
      MLY-100MATα, ura3, ade2, trp1, ufe1TRP1,containing pUFE315 (UFE1)M. Lewis
      MLY-101MATα, ura3, ade2, trp1, ufe1∷TRP1,containing pUT1 (ufe1-1)M. Lewis
      MSUC-2DMATα, ura3, leu2, his3This laboratory
      MSUC-3BMATa, ade2, ura3, leu2, his3This laboratory
      MSUC-7CMATα, ade8, ura3, leu2, his3This laboratory
      PC70MATa, ura3, leu2, trp1, ret1-1P. Cosson
      PC82Mata, ura3, leu2, his3, lys2, ste2LEU2, STE2-WBP1URA3, sec21-2P. Cosson
      PC137MATa, ura3, leu2, his4, trp1, lys2, suc2-Δ9, tip20-5P. Cosson
      RH236-3AMATα, ura3, leu2, his4, sec20-1H. Riezman
      RH239-5AMATα, ura3, his4, leu2, lys2, sec21-1H. Riezman
      RH270-2BMATa, ura3, leu2, his4, lys2, bar1-1H. Riezman
      SC23-3AMATα, leu2, ura3, his3, trp1, lys2, ade8, suc2-Δ9, sec23-1This laboratory
      SHC22-12AMATα, ura3, his3, lys2, suc2-Δ9, sec22-3This laboratory
      SL1-2BMATα, leu2, ura3, lys2, suc2-Δ9, sly1tsThis laboratory
      SLA28-6CMATα, ade2, ade8, ura3, leu2, his3, trp1, sec22HIS3containing pHDS228 (CEN6/ARS4, URA3, ADE8, SEC22)This laboratory
      STE2-4BMATa, ura3, leu2, his3, lys2, ste2LEU2, STE2-WBP1URA3, bar1-1This laboratory
      S20P4/3-9AMATα, ura3, leu2, lys2, pep4HIS3, sec20-1This laboratory
      S21P4-9AMATa, leu2, ura3, pep4HIS3, sec21-1This laboratory
      S27P4-9CMATα, leu2, ura3, lys2, pep4HIS3, sec27-1This laboratory
      S32G-8AMATα, ura3, leu2, his3, sec32-1/bos1This laboratory
      SUA1-3DMATα, ade2, ade8, ura3, leu2, his3, trp1, sec22HIS3This study
      SUA1-12DMATa, ade2, ade8, ura3, leu2, his3, lys2, sec22HIS3containing pHDS228 (CEN6/ARS4, URA3, ADE8, SEC22)This study
      SUA5MATa, ura3, leu2, his3, lys2, ste2LEU2, STE2-WBP1URA3, bar1-1, dsl1-22-6His-2mycloxP-KanMX-loxPThis study
      TNY51MATα, ura3, leu2, his3, trp1, lys2, ade2, sed5-1This laboratory
      TNY140MATa, leu2, ura3, lys2, his4, sec27-1This laboratory
      Y21186MATa/α, ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0, leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0, his3Δ1/his3Δ1, lys2Δ0/LYS2, MET15/met15Δ0, YNL258cKanMX/YNL258cEuroscarf
      YUA1-9CMATα, ade2, ura3, leu2, his3, lys2, dsl1-22This study
      YUA3-1AMATα, ade2, ura3, leu2, his3, pep4HIS3This study
      YUA3-4BMATα, ade2, ade8, ura3, leu2, his3, pep4HIS3, dsl1-22This study
      YUA11MATa, ura3, leu2, his4, lys2, bar1-1, DSL1-6His-2mycloxP-KanMX-loxPThis study
      YUA41MATa, ura3, leu2, his4, lys2, bar1-1, dsl1-22-6His-2mycloxP-KanMX-loxPThis study
      Genomic tagging of the DSL1 gene was achieved as described by De Antoni and Gallwitz (
      • De Antoni A.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ) using the oligonucleotides UA1 (5′-AAA CTG AAA AAA AGA CAA CTT ACG CAT ACG TAA TAC AAG ATG TAC ACT ATA GGG AGA CCG GCA GAT C-3′) and UA2 (5′-GCC ATT GAT GAT ATT TAC GAA ATT AGA GGC ACT GCT CTA GAT GAT TCC CAC CAC CAT CAT CAT CAC-3′), whereas the oligonucleotides UA1 and UA3 (5′-ATG TTT TAC AAT GGG GAT TTT TAT CTT TTT GCG ACA GAC GAA CTA ATC TCC CAC CAC CAT CAT CAT CAC-3′) were used for tagging the dsl1-22 mutant. Plasmids used in this work are listed in Table II.
      Table IIPlasmids
      Plasmid nameDescriptionSource
      pHDS228pRS316-SEC22-ADE8, URA3, CEN6/ARS4This laboratory
      pPR177pGEX-TT-TIP20R. Peng
      pTN159pUG36-SEC22, URA3, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA18pRS315-sec22-3, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA20pRS315-SEC22, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA26pGEX-TT-SEC22ΔcThis study
      pUA30pGEX-TT-BOS1ΔcThis study
      pUA37pRS315-BOS1, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA39pRS315-UFE1, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA40pRS315-SED5, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA42pGEX-TT-SED5ΔcThis laboratory
      pUA43pRS325-SED5, LEU2, 2µmThis study
      pUA44pRS325-UFE1, LEU2, 2µmThis study
      pUA45pRS325-BOS1, LEU2, 2µmThis study
      pUA65pRS315-YKT6, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA73pRS315-DSL1, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA74pRS315-YNL260c, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA81pRS325-DSL1, LEU2, 2µmThis study
      pUA86pRS315-dsl1-22, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA87pRS315-YNL258c-ATX1-YNL260c, LEU2, CEN6/ARS4This study
      pUA93pGEX-TT-DSL1This study
      pUA94pGEX-TT-dsl1-22This study
      pUA101pEG-KT-DSL1This study
      pUA102pEG-KT-dsl1-22This study
      pUA114YEp13-YKT6, LEU2, 2µmThis study
      pU6H2MYCEMBL accession number AJ132965A. De Antoni
      pWB-AcycαCYC1-SEC22-myc-α, URA3, CEN6/ARS1W. Ballensiefen

      Synthetic Lethality Screen

      Mutants synthetically lethal with sec22Δ were isolated using the ade2/ade8, red/white sectoring system (
      • Bender A.
      • Pringle J.R.
      ). The SLA28-6C and SUA1-12D strains were red after transformation with pHDS228 on selective plates but gave white sectors under non-selective conditions due to plasmid loss. After mutagenesis with ethyl methane sulfonate 15 non-sectoring colonies could be identified among 200,000 screened. 10 clones were not able to lose the plasmid (SEC22, URA3) on 5-FOA plates, and 5 of these did not grow at 37 °C. Three of these allowed the displacement of SEC22 by sec22-3. They were transformed with aLEU2/CEN-based yeast genomic library, and one strain showed transformants that sectored and did not contain SEC22. The complementing gene was identified by sequencing the ends of the insert and expression of the single ORF.

      Sequencing the lsd1-1 (dsl1-22) Mutation

      Thelsd1-1 (dsl1-22) mutation was cloned by the gap-repair method (
      • Orr-Weaver T.L.
      • Szostak J.W.
      • Rothstein R.J.
      ). A 3-kilobase pair fragment (XhoI-BglII) containing YNL258c was inserted into the XhoI-BamHI sites of pRS315 (LEU2, CEN6), and a BamHI-SnaBI fragment was removed. The resulting plasmid, which includes DNA that flanks 5′- and 3′-coding regions of DSL1, was transformed into the yeast strain YUA1-9C (MATα, leu2,dsl1-22). Plasmid DNA was isolated from the yeast transformant, amplified in Escherichia coli, and subjected to automated sequencing.

      Antibodies

      The monoclonal anti-c-Myc antibody 9E10 (

      Evan, G. J., Lewis, G. K., Ramsay, G., and Bishop, J. M. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 3610–3616.

      ) and a polyclonal anti-c-Myc antibody (A-14) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Rabbit antibodies against Sec22p (kindly provided by R. Ossig and R. Grabowski), Emp47p (
      • Schröder S.
      • Schimmöller F.
      • Singer-Krüger B.
      • Riezman H.
      ), Bet1p, Bos1p, Sed5p, Ypt1p, Sec24p, and BiP/Kar2p were used (
      • Peng R.W.
      • Grabowski R.
      • DeAntoni A.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ). The polyclonal anti-Ufe1p and anti-coatomer antibodies were gifts from M. Lewis and R. Duden, respectively (Cambridge, UK). Horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies and cyanine-(Cy2TM or Cy3TM)-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from The Jackson Laboratories.

      Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting

      Western blotting analysis was performed as described by Boehm et al. (
      • Boehm J.
      • Ulrich H.D.
      • Ossig R.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ). Aliquots (1 A600 = 1.7 × 107cells) of transformed cells were lysed in 2 m NaOH, 5% mercaptoethanol and proteins precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid, neutralized with 1.5 m Tris base, and dissolved in SDS sample buffer. Proteins were resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE.

      Purification of Recombinant Proteins and Affinity Binding Assay

      E. coli and S. cerevisiae strains expressing GST fusion proteins were lysed, and proteins were solubilized in lysis buffer (20 mm Hepes, pH 6.8, 150 mm KOAc, 5 mm Mg(OAc)2, 1 mm dithiothreitol, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor mix). GST fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B and washed 5 times with 10 volumes lysis buffer. Proteins bound to GST fusion proteins expressed in yeast were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting. E. coli proteins immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B were incubated at 4 °C for 2 h with 100,000 × g supernatant of yeast cell lysate. The beads were washed 5 times, and proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblot analysis.

      Subcellular and Sucrose Gradient Fractionation

      Yeast cells were harvested at mid-logarithmic phase. The cell pellet was washed twice with water and once with B88 (20 mm Hepes, pH 6.8, 250 mm sorbitol, 150 mm KOAc, 5 mmMg(OAc)2), resuspended in a minimal volume of B88 containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor mix (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and pipetted into liquid nitrogen. Cells were ground up in a mortar. The cell powder was resolved in B88 (supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitor mix) and centrifuged twice at 500 ×g for 5 min to remove cell debris, and the clear lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min to obtain the P10 pellet. The S10 fraction was then subjected to centrifugation at 100,000 × g at 4 °C for 1 h to obtain P100 and S100. To investigate the membrane localization of Dsl1p, the supernatant of the cell lysate after a 500 × gcentrifugation was divided into different portions that were treated for 30 min on ice with either 5 m urea, 1% Triton X-100, or 1 m NaCl. The 500 × g lysate was also subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation.
      For fractionation experiments, lysates were loaded on sucrose density gradients (
      • Schröder S.
      • Schimmöller F.
      • Singer-Krüger B.
      • Riezman H.
      ) and spun at 4 °C in a Beckman SW40 rotor at 37,000 rpm for 2.5 h. 1-ml fractions were taken, and the last fraction was adjusted to 1 ml with B88. Each fraction was mixed with 1 ml of SDS-PAGE sample buffer (8 m urea, 50 mmTris-HCl, pH 8.0, 2% SDS, 0.1 mg/ml bromphenol blue) and incubated at 50 °C for 10 min prior to analysis by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

      Protein Labeling, Immunoprecipitation, and Invertase Assay

      For detection of CPY processing cells were shifted to 37 °C for indicated times, pulse-labeled for 5 min with Tran35S-label (ICN) and chased for 30 min. The labeled proteins were immunoprecipitated using specific antibodies and separated by SDS-PAGE. After incubating the gel with Amplify (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 45 min, the proteins were detected by exposing the gels to X-Omat AR (Eastman Kodak Co.) at −80 °C. Invertase activity staining was carried out as described previously (
      • Benli M.
      • Döring F.
      • Robinson D.G.
      • Yang X.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ).

      Fluorescence and Electron Microscopy

      Indirect immunofluorescence was performed as described by Schröderet al. (
      • Schröder S.
      • Schimmöller F.
      • Singer-Krüger B.
      • Riezman H.
      ) using rabbit polyclonal anti-Kar2p and monoclonal mouse c-Myc epitope (9E10) antibodies. Cy2TM-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse F(ab′) 2 fragment (Jackson ImmunoResearch) served as secondary antibody. DNA was stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Cells expressing GFP fusion proteins were grown in SD medium at 25 °C to mid-log phase and placed onto a slide. A coverslip was added, and cells were examined immediately. DAPI staining was achieved after fixing cells in methanol at −20 °C for 10 min, washing with acetone at −20 °C, and washing three times with ice-cold PBS, pH 7.4. Confocal images were obtained with a TSC SP1 confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica). For electron microscopy, yeast cells at mid-logarithmic phase were fixed and stained with permanganate to enhance visualization of membrane structures (
      • Benli M.
      • Döring F.
      • Robinson D.G.
      • Yang X.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ).

      RESULTS

      Identification of Mutants for Which SEC22 Is Essential

      To find proteins that can substitute for Sec22p or to identify factors that prevent these proteins from functioning normally, we performed a synthetic lethality screen. Mutants inviable in the absence ofSEC22 were isolated by using a colony sectoring assay (
      • Bender A.
      • Pringle J.R.
      ).sec22Δ mutants that carry a functional SEC22gene on the centromeric plasmid pHDS228 were mutagenized. In addition to SEC22 this plasmid contains the following two markers required for pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis: URA3 as selectable marker and ADE8, which can serve as a color marker in yeast strains carrying mutated versions of theADE2 and ADE8 genes on the chromosomes. Theade8 mutation is epistatic to ade2 and prevents the formation of the red color typical for ade2 mutants. Therefore, cells expressing ADE8 from a plasmid are red, whereas those that lost the plasmid turn white. As expected, on rich media sec22Δ, ade8, ade2, ura3 cells containing pHDS228 could form white sectors since neither SEC22,ADE8, nor URA3 are essential. After mutagenesis, we screened for non-sectoring colonies (for details see “Experimental Procedures”). To confirm that the non-sectoring phenotype in fact reflects a positive selection for the presence of theSEC22-carrying plasmid, all mutants were tested for their ability to lose the second plasmid-encoded marker,URA3. This test makes use of the drug 5-FOA (5-fluoroorotic acid), which is toxic to Ura+ cells (
      • Boecke J.D.
      • LaCroute F.
      • Fink G.R.
      ). In fact, most of the non-sectoring mutants were sensitive to 5-FOA and only these mutants were analyzed further. In addition to these two phenotypes, five mutants obtained in two independent screens were also temperature-sensitive for growth. Genetic analysis showed that the mutations are recessive and that the inability to lose theSEC22 gene is tightly linked to the growth defect at 37 °C (see Fig. 1A). They belong to three different complementation groups that we called “LSD1, -2, and -3” (lethal withSEC22 deletion).
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Growth characteristics ofdsl1-22 mutant cells.A, sec22::HIS3/sec22::HIS3 DSL1/dsl1-22, ade2/ade2, ade8/ade8 heterozygous diploid cells carrying ADE8 and SEC22 on a plasmid (pHDS228) were sporulated; spores were separated, and the segregants were incubated on rich medium. Tetrads were replica-plated to low adenine plates and incubated either at 25 or 37 °C. Allred colonies that are not able to lose the plasmid pHDS228 are temperature-sensitive showing that both defects are closely linked.B, growth of wild type (MSUC-3B) and dsl1-22(YUA1–9C) cells was monitored by measuring the cell density (A600 nm) during incubation at 25 °C. After 5 h of incubation at 25 °C an aliquot of each sample was shifted to 37 °C for additional 5 h.
      We tried to clone the “LSD” genes from single copy or multicopy genomic libraries containing LEU2 as a selectable marker (
      • Dascher C.
      • Ossig R.
      • Gallwitz D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ). To obtain complementing plasmids, we selected transformants on plates lacking leucine and looked for colonies with white sectors. The formation of white sectors indicated that the cells had again acquired the ability to lose the SEC22-carrying plasmid pHDS228. Those transformants, which had simply received an additional copy of SEC22 from the library, were identified by PCR and discarded. So far our attempts to isolate complementing plasmids from a single copy library were successful only for the “lsd1-1” mutant. The library plasmid that we obtained harbored three intact open reading frames. Sequencing and subcloning showed that the presence of YNL258c alone was sufficient to suppress both the non-sectoring phenotype and the temperature sensitivity of the lsd1-1 mutant. The open reading frameYNL258c, located on chromosome XIV, encodes an essential protein with a predicted molecular mass of 88 kDa with no similarity to other proteins in data bases (
      • Entian K.D.
      • Schuster T.
      • Hegemann J.H.
      • Becher D.
      • Feldmann H.
      • Güldener U.
      • Götz R.
      • Hansen M.
      • Hollenberg C.P.
      • Jansen G.
      • Kramer W.
      • Klein S.
      • Kötter P.
      • Kricke J.
      • Launhardt H.
      • Mannhaupt G.
      • Maierl A.
      • Meyer P.
      • Mewes W.
      • Munder T.
      • Niedenthal R.K.
      • Ramezani Rad M.
      • Röhmer A.
      • Römer A.
      • Hinnen A.
      ).
      The following observations confirmed that defects in YNL258cresult in a SEC22-dependent phenotype as well as a conditional lethal phenotype. Cloning and sequencing of thelsd1-1 mutant allele revealed the presence of a stop codon at position 2173 of the 2265-base pair long reading frame. This would lead to a gene product, which is 30 residues shorter than the putative wild type protein. By using a PCR-based method described by De Antoni and Gallwitz (
      • De Antoni A.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ), we replaced YNL258c either by a full-length or a shortened version, which were fused to sequences encoding a His6 epitope followed by two copies of a c-Myc tag. The KanMX cassette inserted downstream of the c-Myc-tagged YNL258c sequences served as a selectable marker that allows the transformants to grow in the presence of geneticin (G418). Temperature-sensitive transformants were obtained only when the C-terminally truncated version of YNL258c was introduced into wild type cells. Western blotting analysis showed that Ts transformants in fact encode a shorter c-Myc-tagged YNL258c protein than cells expressing the full-length version (data not shown). Tetrad analysis also confirmed that these mutants needSEC22 for growth (see below). The same results were obtained when N-terminally tagged versions of YNL258c and its mutant variant expressed from a centromeric vector were used to complement the deletion of YNL258c. In summary, these data established that the deletion of 30 C-terminal triplets from the ORF YNL258cresults in a conditional lethal phenotype. In cells carrying this mutation the otherwise non-essential SEC22 gene is rendered essential.
      While this work was in progress Waters and co-workers (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ) showed that mutations in YNL258c can make cells dependent on theSLY1-20 mutation. The mutants identified were accordingly named dsl1-1 to dsl1-7 (dependent onSLY1-20). SLY1-20 is a dominant mutation, which suppresses the defects in several yeast mutants affected in ER-to-Golgi transport (
      • Dascher C.
      • Ossig R.
      • Gallwitz D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ,
      • Ossig R.
      • Dascher C.
      • Trepte H.H.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ,
      • Sapperstein S.K.
      • Lupashin V.V.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      • Waters M.G.
      ,
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Cao X.C.
      • Lupashin V.V.
      • Barlowe C.
      • Waters M.G.
      ,
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Cao X.
      • Sapperstein S.K.
      • Chiang E.C.
      • Lupashin V.V.
      • Barlowe C.
      • Waters M.G.
      ,
      • Sacher M.
      • Jiang Y.
      • Barrowman J.
      • Scarpa A.
      • Burston J.
      • Zhang L.
      • Schieltz D.
      • Yates J.R.
      • Abeliovich H.
      • Ferro-Novick S.
      ). Accordingly, the mutant we obtained was renamed dsl1-22. Consistent with the results obtained by VanRheenen et al. (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ), the temperature sensitivity ofdsl1-22 is suppressed by the SLY1-20 mutation on a single copy plasmid (data not shown).

      Genetic Interaction of dsl1-22 with Other Genes Whose Products Act in ER-Golgi Anterograde and Retrograde Transport

      In the process of cloning out sequences able to complement the dsl1-22mutation, we also obtained clones from multicopy libraries. Among these clones were plasmids containing the YKT6 gene.YKT6 encodes a lipid-anchored member of the synaptobrevin family of SNARE proteins (
      • McNew J.A.
      • Sogaard M.
      • Lampen N.M.
      • Machida S.
      • Ye R.R.
      • Lacomis L.
      • Tempst P.
      • Rothman J.E.
      • Söllner T.H.
      ). This prompted us to test whether the overexpression of other SNARE-encoding genes has similar effects.
      We found that, similar to the results obtained with YKT6,overexpression of SED5 allowed dsl1-22 mutants to tolerate the loss of SEC22. However, the overexpression of neither YKT6 nor SED5 was able to suppress the Ts phenotype of ds11-22 mutants. Overexpression of the other SNARE-encoding genes specific for ER-Golgi transport, BET1, BOS1 or UFE1, was unable to suppress the non-sectoring phenotype of dsl1-22mutants.
      The approach, which led to the isolation of the dsl1-22, was based on the synthetic lethality of the dsl1-22 mutation when combined with the sec22 deletion. Therefore, we also addressed the question whether dsl1-22 is synthetically lethal with other defects in ER-to-Golgi transport. For this and all subsequent assays we used dsl1-22 mutants expressingSEC22 from its normal locus on chromosome XII: (i) a strain obtained by backcrossing cells derived from the original mutant (Fig.1A) twice to wild type cells (SEC22), and (ii) a mutant in which we had introduced dsl1-22-mycconstruct at the YNL258c locus (see above). The analysis of tetrads was greatly facilitated by the presence of the KanMX cassette closely linked to the dsl1-22-myc allele which thus allowed us to identify the dsl1-22 mutants by their resistance to G418.
      Viable double mutants were obtained when we combined thedsl1-22 defect with sec23-1, sec22-3,bet1-1, sed5-1, bos1 (sec31-1), andsec27-1 mutations. The first mutation leads to a block in anterograde ER-to-Golgi transport due to a defect in COPII assembly (
      • Hicke L.
      • Schekman R.
      ); bet1-1, sec22-3, and sed5-1 are mutations that affect genes encoding SNARE proteins involved in ER-Golgi transport, whereas SEC27 encodes a COPI component (
      • Duden R.
      • Hosobuchi M.
      • Hamamoto S.
      • Winey M.
      • Byers B.
      • Schekman R.
      ). The number of viable double mutants obtained differed to a great extent as determined by complementation assays and analyzing their resistance to G418 (for details see “Experimental Procedures”). The observation that sec22-3, dsl1-22 double mutants are viable whereas dsl1-22 mutants are inviable in the absence of SEC22 was confirmed by plasmid shuffling experiments using a dsl1-22 mutant and SEC22 orsec22-3 containing plasmids (data not shown). This finding illustrates that this assay is specific for certain alleles. Therefore, missing or weak genetic interactions mentioned above do not rule out that the gene products perform a related function. This may be true at least for BOS1 and DSL1 since all thebos1 (sec31-1), dsl1-22 double mutants that we obtained formed very small colonies. No double mutants were obtained when diploids heterozygous for the dsl1-22 and thesec22Δ, sec21-1, ret1-1,ret1-1, sly1ts, sec20-1, ortip20-5 mutations were subjected to tetrad analysis. Thesec21-1 (γ-COP), ret1-1 (α-COP),ret1-1 (δ-COP), sec20-1, and tip20-5mutants primarily affect the retrograde transport from Golgi to ER, and defects in forward transport may be secondary (
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ,
      • Cosson P.
      • Démollière C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Duden R.
      • Letourneur F.
      ,
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Rayner J.C.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Cosson P.
      • Schröder-Köhne S.
      • Sweet D.S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Frigerio G.
      • Letourneur F.
      ). The strong genetic interaction between dsl1-22 and these mutations indicates that DSL1 may be required for Golgi-ER retrograde transport. The synthetic lethality of dsl1-22 andsly1ts are consistent with the observation made by VanRheenen et al. (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ) who isolated dsl1 mutants that depend on a dominant SLY1 mutation.

      The dsl1-22 Mutant Shows Slight Defects in Forward Transport

      The dsl1-22 mutant cells gave rise to slightly smaller colonies than wild type cells even at room temperature. Accordingly, the growth rate of dsl1-22 mutant cells is slower when measured in liquid culture (Fig. 1B). Growth of dsl1-22 mutants stops completely 2 h after a shift to 37 °C. This Ts phenotype allowed us to examine the function of Dsl1p in the secretory pathway at restrictive temperatures. First we analyzed the secretion of periplasmic invertase in wild type and dsl1-22 cells at different times after shifting cells to 37 °C. Measuring total invertase activity using intact and permeabilized cells (
      • Johnson L.M.
      • Bankaitis V.A.
      • Emr S.D.
      ) showed that the ratio of secreted to intracellular invertase does not change significantly up to 3 h after the shift to 37 °C (data not shown). To detect a possible glycosylation defect due to slower ER-to-Golgi transport indsl1-22 mutants, intracellular and extracellular fractions of wild type and mutant cells were separated by non-denaturing PAGE. Invertase was visualized by an activity stain. As shown in Fig.2A, dsl1-22 cells secrete partially underglycosylated invertase even at 25 °C. The shift to the restrictive temperature leads to some accumulation of the ER core-glycosylated form inside the cell. For comparison, at restrictive temperature the sec22-3 mutation also leads to the intracellular accumulation of core-glycosylated invertase and secretion of a small amount of underglycosylated enzyme. An incomplete block in anterograde transport also became evident when the maturation of the vacuolar protease CPY was analyzed in dsl1-22 cells (Fig.2B). In pulse-chase experiments CPY appears first as a p1 precursor in the ER, is then modified to a larger form, p2, in the Golgi, and is transported to the vacuole where it is processed to its mature form (m) by proteolysis. As expected, sec22-3 mutant cells show a complete block in ER-to-Golgi transport 15 min after the shift to 37 °C. In this mutant only the ER form (p1) is visible consistent with a complete block in ER-to-Golgi transport. Indsl1-22 cells about half of CPY is still normally processed even 3.5 h after the shift to 37 °C. This corresponds to the results observed with other temperature-sensitive alleles ofDSL1 (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ).
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2dsl1-22 cells exhibit mild defects in anterograde ER-to-Golgi transport.A, fate of secreted invertase in dsl1-22 cells. Invertase synthesis was induced for 30 min in wild type (Dsl1-myc; YUA11),dsl1-22-myc (YUA41), and sec22-3 cells (SHC21-12A) either at 25 or 37 °C. Preincubation at 37 °C started 30 min before induction. Glycosylation level of the enzyme in intracellular (I) and extracellular fractions (E) was detected by an activity stain in non-denaturing gels. The position of highly glycosylated invertase (S) and ER core-glycosylated invertase (ER) is indicated. B,intracellular processing of carboxypeptidase Y in wild type (YUA11) and mutant cells (YUA41 and SHC21-12A). Cells were shifted to 37 °C for indicated times, pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 5 min, and chased for 0 and 30 min. The cells were lysed; CPY was immunoprecipitated, and proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE.

      dsl1-22 Cells Accumulate ER Membranes but Not Vesicles at Restrictive Temperature

      The morphology of wild type anddsl1-22 cells incubated at 25 or 37 °C was compared by electron microscopy. As shown by Kaiser and Schekman (
      • Kaiser C.A.
      • Schekman R.
      ), mutants with defects in the budding reaction accumulate membranes, whereas mutants that exhibit defects in fusion of vesicles with target membranes accumulate vesicles. At 25 °C the morphology of dsl1-22cells does not differ significantly from that of wild type cells grown at 37 °C (Fig. 3, A andB). Fig. 3C shows a representative micrograph of a dsl1-22 mutant cell after incubation at the nonpermissive temperature for 90 min. Compared with wild type cells (Fig.3A) dsl1-22 cells show a strong accumulation of membranes, which mainly emerge from the ER contiguous with the nuclear membrane (Fig. 3, C and D, arrow). Similar structures also originate from cortical endoplasmic reticulum close to the plasma membrane (Fig. 3D,arrowhead). No significant increase in the number of small vesicles was observed. Thus, dsl1-22 mutants very much resemble the coatomer mutant sec27-1 (
      • Duden R.
      • Hosobuchi M.
      • Hamamoto S.
      • Winey M.
      • Byers B.
      • Schekman R.
      ).
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Figure 3Electron micrographs of wild type anddsl1-22 cells. Wild type cells (MSUC-3B) grown at 37 °C for 90 min were used as a control (A). Mutant cells (YUA1-9C) grown at 25(B) or 37 °C for 90 min (C and D) were fixed with potassium permanganate to highlight membrane structures. Typical cells are shown for each condition. The arrowhead in D points to membranes emanating from the cortical ER (E), whereas arrows inC and D indicate sites of membrane accumulation at the nucleus (N). V, vacuole. Bars,1 µm in A–C; 0.1 µm in D.

      dsl1-22 Mutants Are Defective in the Retrieval of ER Proteins from the Golgi

      The strong genetic interaction of thedsl1-22 defect with mutations affecting retrograde Golgi-to-ER transport and the incomplete block in anterograde transport when growth already had ceased indicated that the primary function of Dsl1p could be in the retrieval of proteins from the Golgi complex. Therefore, we employed different assays to compare retrograde transport in wild type and dsl1-22 cells.
      Mutants affecting genes required in retrograde transport likeSEC20 and SEC22 secrete large amounts of the soluble ER protein BiP/Kar2p (
      • Semenza J.C.
      • Hardwick K.G.
      • Dean N.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ). Fig.4A shows that the same is true for dsl1-22 and dsl1-22-myc mutants. This defect in BiP/Kar2p localization was also observed by immunofluorescence microscopy using an affinity-purified polyclonal anti-BiP/Kar2p antibody. In wild type cells BiP/Kar2p antibodies stain the nuclear periphery which is the characteristic ER staining in yeast (
      • Rose M.D.
      • Misra L.M.
      • Vogel J.P.
      ). In contrast to the typical ER staining in wild type cells, we could observe a dot-like pattern in dsl1-22 cells even at permissive temperature (Fig. 4B), similar to “BiP bodies” observed in several ER-to-Golgi mutants at restrictive temperature (
      • Nishikawa S.
      • Hirata A.
      • Nakano A.
      ).
      Figure thumbnail gr4
      Figure 4Mislocalization of different ER proteins inDSL1 mutant cells.A, wild type (DSL1, MSUC-7C, and DSL1-myc, YUA11) ordsl1-22 mutant cells (dsl1-22, YUA1-9C, anddsl1-22-myc, YUA41) were transferred into fresh YPD medium and grown at 25 °C. At A600 nm of 1.0 cells were removed from the medium by centrifugation, and proteins in the medium were precipitated by the addition of 10% trichloroacetic acid (final concentration). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting using polyclonal anti-BiP/Kar2p antibodies.B, wild type (MSUC-3B) and dsl1-22 (YUA1-9C) cells were grown to an early log phase at 25 °C, fixed, and stained with affinity purified anti-BiP/Kar2p antibody (upper panels). In addition, DAPI staining was used to localize the nuclei (lower panels). C, Sec22-α processing by the late Golgi protease Kex2p. Immunoblot analysis was performed with extract from wild type (DSL1, MSUC-7C, andDSL1-myc, YUA11) or dsl1-22 mutant cells (dsl1-22, YUA1-9C, and dsl1-22-myc, YUA41) transformed with pWB-Acycα as indicated. Aliquots of cells were harvested after overnight incubation at 25 °C in selective medium, and proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. A polyclonal anti-Sec22p serum was used to detect the Sec22p-derived hybrid protein (Sec22-α), its Kex2p cleavage product (Kex2p-c.p.), and the endogenous Sec22 protein. D, confocal images of unfixed cells expressing GFP-Sec22p grown at 25 °C. Images show the cellular distribution of GFP-Sec22p in wild type (Dsl1-myc, YUA11),dsl1-22-myc cells (YUA41), UFE1 wild type cells (MLY-100), and ufe1-1 mutant cells (MLY101). E, dsl1-22 cells are defective in ER retrieval of Ste2-Wbp1p.MATaste2Δ yeast cells expressing Ste2-Wbp1p were grown on YPD plates and replica-plated to a lawn ofMATα cells. After 6 h at 30 °C to allow mating, cells were replica-plated to SD plates selective for the growth of diploid cells only. sec21-2 (PC82) anddsl1-22-myc (SUA5) mutants were able to form diploids, whereas wild type (WT) (STE2-4B) cells could not mate with the tester strain (MSUC-2D).
      To examine the defect in retrograde transport more specifically, we focused on the targeting of the SNARE protein Sec22p. As described previously (
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ,
      • Boehm J.
      • Letourneur F.
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Démollière C.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ) α-factor fused to Sec22p through a Kex2p cleavage site, and a c-Myc epitope is a suitable tool for analyzing targeting of Sec22p. Several recycling mutants exhibit mislocalization of Sec22-α (
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ) resulting in cleavage by the late Golgi protease Kex2p. The removal of the α-factor reporter from Sec22p is easily detected by immunoblot analysis. Fig. 4C shows the steady state processing of Sec22-α in wild type, dsl1-22 anddsl1-22-myc strains incubated at 25 °C. About 75% of Sec22-α proteins was cleaved by Kex2p in mutant cells, whereas very little of the reporter was cleaved by Kex2p in wild type cells. Pre-shifting cells to 37 °C for 2 h did not result in a more efficient cleavage (data not shown). It is unlikely that more efficient cleavage of Sec22-α in dsl1-22 is due to some Kex2p activity in the ER since mislocalization of a Sec22p-derived fusion protein was also obvious when we analyzed cells producing a GFP-tagged Sec22 protein (Fig. 4D). This fusion protein is fully functional since it is able to suppress the growth defect ofsec22-3 mutants (data not shown). Moreover, GFP-Sec22p behaves like C-terminally tagged Sec22 proteins when analyzed in wild type and ufe1-1 mutant cells (Fig. 4D; see Ref.
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ). In wild type cells fluorescence appeared as a ring around the nucleus which represents ER, whereas in dsl1-22 cells a punctated staining was detectable, very likely representing Golgi structures (
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ). As with other recycling mutants, this defect already occurs at 25 °C (
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ). Taken together, both the efficient Kex2p processing of Sec22-α and the localization of GFP-Sec22 indicate thatdsl1-22 mutants are defective in ER retention of Sec22p.
      To examine whether the dsl1-22 mutation also interferes with the ER retention of type I transmembrane proteins carrying the KKXX retrieval signal, we performed the Ste2-Wbp1-dependent mating assay described by Letourneuret al. (
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ). We introduced thedsl1-22-myc allele into a strain expressing a KKXX-tagged version of the α-factor receptor (Ste2-Wbp1p) instead of the wild type STE2 gene. Wild type cells of mating type a expressing only this receptor cannot mate with cells of mating type α since Ste2-Wbp1p is efficiently retained in the ER due to the KKXX-tag fused to the C terminus. Mutants that mislocalize the receptor to the plasma membrane can form diploids with a suitable tester strain. With the Ste2-Wbp1-based assay efficient mating occurs for instance in sec21-2 (γ-COP) mutants (see Ref.
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ; see also Fig. 4E). Fig. 4E shows thatdsl1-22-myc cells producing Ste2-Wbp1p can mate as efficiently as the sec21-2 mutants indicating that targeting of KKXX-tagged ER proteins is impaired already at a permissive temperature of 30 °C. In summary, the data show thatdsl1-22 mutants are defective in the ER retention of different types of proteins: soluble HDEL carrying proteins like BiP/Kar2p, type II transmembrane proteins like the v-SNARE Sec22p, as well as type I transmembrane proteins carrying a KKXX retrieval signal.

      Subcellular Distribution of Dsl1p

      According to its primary sequence, Dsl1p contains no putative transmembrane domains. Extracts from Dsl1-myc producing cells (YUA11) were used to examine a possible membrane association of Dsl1p. A 500 × gsupernatant of cell lysate was treated either with buffer (B88), 5m urea, 1% Triton X-100, or 1 m NaCl and subsequently centrifuged at 10,000 × g and 100,000 × g (Fig. 5). When incubated with buffer alone, no Dsl1-myc was detectable in the soluble fraction, whereas both urea and detergent treatment led to solubilization of Dsl1-myc. Less than 5% of the total amount of Dsl1-myc became soluble upon treatment with high salt suggesting that Dsl1p is a peripherally associated membrane protein. In contrast, the transmembrane protein Sec22p could only be solubilized by detergent. Experiments using a recently obtained Dsl1-specific serum gave identical results (data not shown).
      Figure thumbnail gr5
      Figure 5Dsl1p is a peripheral membrane protein.Logarithmically grown cells of YUA11 (DSL1-myc) were disrupted using glass beads. The lysate (500 × gsupernatant) was treated as indicated (see “Experimental Procedures”) and then centrifuged at 10,000 and 100,000 ×g. The resulting pellet (P10 and P100) and supernatant (S100) fractions were resolved on a 12% polyacrylamide gel and immunoblotted with anti-Sec22p and anti-c-Myc antibody (9E10). In contrast to the integral membrane protein Sec22p, Dsl1-myc became soluble after incubation with 5m urea.
      Next we performed subcellular fractionation studies using sucrose density gradients to compare the localization of Dsl1p with that of known Golgi- and ER-resident proteins. Cell lysates of strain YUA11 (DSL1-myc) were prepared and loaded on top of sucrose gradients, and fractions were collected after centrifugation as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Fig.6, A and B, shows that Emp47p, a Golgi marker, the ER resident t-SNARE Ufe1p, as well as the ER-marker BiP/Kar2p display characteristic distributions (
      • Schröder S.
      • Schimmöller F.
      • Singer-Krüger B.
      • Riezman H.
      ,
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Rose M.D.
      • Misra L.M.
      • Vogel J.P.
      ). Like Ufe1p and BiP/Kar2p Dsl1-myc protein was detectable exclusively in the dense fractions when using the monoclonal anti-c-Myc antibody 9E10 directed against the c-Myc epitope, presumably reflecting ER localization (Fig. 6C).
      Figure thumbnail gr6
      Figure 6Dsl1p cofractionates with ER markers in sucrose velocity gradients. Lysates of strains YUA11 (DSL1-myc) grown at 25 °C were loaded on 18–60% sucrose density gradients. After centrifugation, fractions were collected and subjected to Western blot analysis with antibodies directed against Emp47p, a Golgi marker (A, see Ref.
      • Schröder S.
      • Schimmöller F.
      • Singer-Krüger B.
      • Riezman H.
      ), Ufe1p and BiP/Kar2p, two ER markers (B, see Refs.
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      and
      • Rose M.D.
      • Misra L.M.
      • Vogel J.P.
      ), and c-Myc to detect tagged Dsl1 protein expressed at wild type levels (C). The data represent average values from at least two experiments.

      Dsl1p Interacts Physically with Coatomer

      To get additional clues for the involvement of Dsl1p in retrograde and/or anterograde ER-to-Golgi transport, we investigated possible interactions of Dsl1p with proteins involved in these trafficking steps. First we tried to address this question by expressing Dsl1p tagged with glutathioneS-transferase (GST) in yeast. The 100,000 ×g supernatants from detergent-lysed yeast cells (YUA11) expressing GST or GST-Dsl1p were loaded on glutathione-Sepharose 4B to immobilize GST or GST-Dsl1p and associated proteins. After washing the beads to remove unbound proteins, antibodies were used to monitor the binding of several ER/Golgi proteins to Dsl1p. Anti-coatomer antibodies resulted in very strong signals (data not shown), whereas only weak signals were obtained with Emp47p-specific antibodies. These signals were specific for the Dsl1 part of the fusion protein since no binding was observed when lysates from GST-expressing cells were analyzed. The SNARE proteins Bet1p, Bos1p, Sec22p, and Sed5p as well as the COPII component Sec24p and the Rab-like GTPase Ypt1p were not retained on the affinity matrix in significant amounts.
      To verify and extend these findings, we incubated extracts of detergent-lysed yeast cells with different GST fusion proteins purified from E. coli. In line with the results obtained with GST fusion proteins expressed in yeast, coatomer (COPI) showed strong binding to GST-Dsl1p. Notably, coatomer recruitment to GST-Dsl1p fromE. coli takes place even at 4 °C (see “Experimental Procedures”), a temperature where enzymatic activities are low. As controls, GST, GST-Sed5p, GST-Bos1p, or GST-Sec22p were not able to recruit coatomer from cell lysates (Fig.7). Very faint bands representing coatomer were seen when GST-Tip20p was loaded on glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Fig. 7B, lane 5). Dsl1p may mediate this indirect binding between GST-Tip20 and coatomer because Ito et al. (
      • Ito T.
      • Chiba T.
      • Ozawa R.
      • Yoshida M.
      • Hattori M.
      • Sakaki Y.
      ) recently showed that Tip20p and Dsl1p interact in two-hybrid assays. However, so far we could not observe direct binding of Dsl1-myc to GST-Tip20p in vitro. In addition, Dsl1-myc did not bind to GST-Bos1p, GST-Sec22p, or GST-Sed5p (data not shown). Likewise, GST-Dsl1p was not able to bind Bet1p, Bos1p, Sec22p, Sed5p, Ypt1p, Sec24p, or Emp47p, suggesting that the weak binding of Emp47p mentioned above could be indirect via coatomer.
      Figure thumbnail gr7
      Figure 7Specific binding of coatomer subunits to GST-Dsl1p. Proteins from detergent-lysed yeast cells were incubated at 4 °C for 2 h with GST alone or GST fusion proteins purified from E. coli and immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B. Beads were washed 5 times (see “Experimental Procedures”), and the proteins bound were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Blue staining (A) and immunoblot analysis using a polyclonal antibody against coatomer (B). The positions of molecular weight markers and the different COPI subunits are indicated.

      DISCUSSION

      Genetic Analysis Indicates That Dsl1p Is Required for Retrograde Golgi ER Traffic

      In the present study we identified a novel mutation that renders cells dependent on the otherwise dispensable SNARE protein Sec22p. This mutation makes cells temperature-sensitive for growth, allowing us to analyze the function of the affected gene. Cloning and sequencing showed that this mutant is a new allele of the essential open reading frame YNL258c, encoding a truncated protein that lacks its 30 C-terminal residues.
      Recently, mutant alleles of YNL258c, named dsl1-1and dsl1-2, were identified by VanRheenen et al.(
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ) as mutations that make yeast cells dependent on the dominant suppressor mutation of SLY1, SLY1-20. Thus, screening for genetic defects that confer dependence on either Sec22p or on the dominant SLY1-20 mutation led to the identification of the same gene, DSL1. By comparing the results, the Sec22p-dependent dsl1-22 mutant has similar properties as the PCR-generated temperature-sensitive allelesdsl1-5 and dsl1-6 obtained by VanRheenen et al. (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ). They show a slight defect in ER-to-Golgi transport of CPY, and their growth defect at 37 °C can be suppressed by theSLY1-20 mutation. However, the mutants obtained using the two approaches differ in several other phenotypes. TheSEC22-dependent dsl1-22 mutant is temperature-sensitive, and defects in vesicular transport could thus be analyzed directly. The SLY1-20-dependent mutantsdsl1-1 and dsl1-2 are not Ts and display secretory defects only after expression of theSLY1-20 allele is shut off. Another difference concerns the suppression of the non-sectoring phenotype. The dependence of thedsl1-1 mutant on SLY1-20 could not be suppressed by overexpression of the t-SNARE-encoding SED5 gene (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ), whereas SED5 overexpression in dsl1-22 cells could eliminate the requirement for Sec22p. This observation may imply a direct functional link between Dsl1p and SNARE proteins like Sec22p and Sed5p.
      Both Sec22p and Sed5p show strong genetic interactions with genes encoding proteins involved in Golgi-ER retrograde transport (
      • Ossig R.
      • Dascher C.
      • Trepte H.H.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      • Gallwitz D.
      ,
      • Hardwick K.G.
      • Boothroyd J.C.
      • Rudner A.D.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Frigerio G.
      ). Double mutant analysis revealed that the same is true fordsl1-22. During our attempts to create double mutants harboring the dsl1-22 mutation combined with additional mutations affecting the ER-Golgi transport cycle, we observed the strongest genetic interactions of dsl1-22 with mutations affecting retrograde Golgi-to-ER transport. No double mutants were obtained when we crossed dsl1-22 strains with mutants affected in coatomer subunit-encoding genes like RET1(α-COP), RET2 (δ-COP), and SEC21 (γ-COP) or with mutants in SEC20 and TIP20 which are important for fusion of Golgi-derived vesicles with the ER (
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Rayner J.C.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ,
      • Cosson P.
      • Schröder-Köhne S.
      • Sweet D.S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Frigerio G.
      • Letourneur F.
      ). In accordance with this, VanRheenen et al. (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ) found that overexpression of the γ-COP-encoding SEC21 gene partially suppresses the Ts defect of dsl1 mutants. Together these results strongly suggest that Dsl1p may play a role in Golgi-ER retrograde traffic. One could speculate that the need for Sec22p displayed by the dsl1-22 mutant may be due to the mislocalization of SNARE proteins that can functionally replace Sec22p. This is also indicated by the fact that the requirement for Sec22p at least at room temperature can be alleviated either by excess of Ykt6p or Sed5p, two other SNARE proteins. As discussed below, Sec22p as well as Bos1p are in fact mislocalized in dsl1-22 cells. Unexpectedly, SEC22 can be replaced in dsl1-22mutants by the sec22-3 allele. This was surprising since thesec22-3 point mutation has stronger effects on the growth of certain strains than the deletion of SEC22(sec22Δ cells that are not Ts can become temperature-sensitive after introducing a sec22-3-containing plasmid).
      T. Neumann, unpublished results.

      dsl1-22 Mutants Have a Strong ER Retention Defect

      Indsl1-22 cells maturation of the vacuolar hydrolase CPY is only partially inhibited, similar to what has been described for the PCR-generated dsl1-5 and dsl1-6 mutants (
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ). Invertase secretion is almost normal in dsl1-22 mutants and a slight inhibition of anterograde transport is indicated by the accumulation of a small amount of core-glycosylated invertase. Electron microscopy analysis of mutant cells reveals a severe accumulation of membranes emerging from the ER after shift to nonpermissive temperature. Similar structures were observed in a β′-COP mutant,sec27-1 (
      • Duden R.
      • Hosobuchi M.
      • Hamamoto S.
      • Winey M.
      • Byers B.
      • Schekman R.
      ). Since the morphology of dsl1-22mutant cells is almost normal at 25 °C, a temperature at which retrograde transport is already affected (see below), this EM phenotype at restrictive temperature is likely to be a more indirect effect due to perturbed forward transport.
      The weak inhibitory effect on forward transport appears to be a result of a strong defect in retrograde transport back to the ER. Indsl1-22 cells this block is already seen at permissive temperature, consistent with what has been seen with other recycling mutants (
      • Ballensiefen W.
      • Ossipov D.
      • Schmitt H.D.
      ,
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ,
      • Cosson P.
      • Démollière C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Duden R.
      • Letourneur F.
      ). The dsl1-22 mutant allele affects the retrieval of recycling SNARE proteins, proteins sorted by their C-terminal KKXX motif, and the soluble ER protein BiP/Kar2p, whose recycling depends on the HDEL receptor Erd2p (
      • Semenza J.C.
      • Hardwick K.G.
      • Dean N.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ). How can retrograde transport defects have an effect on forward transport? Obviously, one possibility is that components of the vesicle budding and fusion machineries may become limiting due to their mislocalization. In addition, it is known that exit from the ER requires the proper folding of cargo molecules, and this in turn depends on chaperones like BiP/Kar2p or PDI (
      • Simons J.F.
      • Ferro-Novick S.
      • Rose M.D.
      • Helenius A.
      ,
      • Holst B.
      • Tachibana C.
      • Winther J.R.
      ). These chaperones carry a C-terminal HDEL signal that mediates their retention in the ER. In dsl1-22 mutant cells, BiP/Kar2p and very likely PDI are not properly retained in the ER. Insufficient amounts of BiP/Kar2p and PDI in the ER could retard the exit of cargo molecules (
      • Simons J.F.
      • Ferro-Novick S.
      • Rose M.D.
      • Helenius A.
      ,
      • Holst B.
      • Tachibana C.
      • Winther J.R.
      ).
      The following results demonstrated that dsl1-22 cells are defective in Golgi-to-ER-retrieval of Sec22p. A GFP-tagged version of Sec22p localizes to the ER in wild type cells, whereas indsl1-22 cells GFP-Sec22p displays a punctate staining pattern typical for Golgi markers. The Sec22-α fusion protein reaches the late Golgi apparatus in dsl1-22 cells but not in wild type cells as indicated by its Kex2p-dependent cleavage. Fractionation studies with sucrose density gradients showed that Bos1p exhibits a shift from ER-to-Golgi fractions in dsl1-22 cells compared with wild type cells (data not shown). Mislocalization of the soluble ER marker BiP/Kar2p was also demonstrated using immunofluorescence and a secretion assay. BiP/Kar2p fluorescence indsl1-22 mutant cells shows a punctate pattern. Similar, more randomly distributed structures were described previously for severalsec mutants and were named BiP bodies (
      • Nishikawa S.
      • Hirata A.
      • Nakano A.
      ). These authors suggested that BiP bodies could be exit sites where leaving proteins accumulate in different mutant strains due to low efficiency of Golgi-to-ER retrieval. Some mutants even secrete Kar2p into the medium. Indeed, this phenomenon can be observed with dsl1-22 mutant cells. The level of Kar2p secretion by these cells is comparable to that of sec22-3, sec22Δ, sec20-1cells (
      • Semenza J.C.
      • Hardwick K.G.
      • Dean N.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ).
      U. Andag and H. D. Schmitt, unpublished observations.
      Besides mislocalization of SNARE proteins and of the luminal ER protein BiP/Kar2p, dsl1-22 cells exhibit also defects in retrieval of proteins sorted by their C-terminal KKXX motif. In this study we used Ste2-Wbp1p as a marker protein (
      • Letourneur F.
      • Gaynor E.C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Duden R.
      • Emr S.D.
      • Riezman H.
      • Cosson P.
      ). Our results implicate Dsl1p in retrograde transport of dilysine-tagged proteins from the Golgi compartment to the ER. We also analyzed the localization of Emp47p, a Golgi protein carrying a variant of the dilysine-motif, KXKXX (
      • Schröder S.
      • Schimmöller F.
      • Singer-Krüger B.
      • Riezman H.
      ). Unlike Ste2-Wbp1p, the localization of Emp47p is unaffected in dsl1-22 cells. This is indicated by the results of gradient fractionation and immunofluorescence experiments (data not shown). In this respect, dsl1-22 mutants resembleret1 (α-COP) mutants that also mislocalize KKXX-tagged proteins of the ER but not the KXKXX-tagged Emp47p (
      • Schröder-Köhne S.
      • Letourneur F.
      • Riezman H.
      ).

      The Localization of Dsl1p Is Still Unclear

      Dsl1p is a peripheral membrane protein that can be solubilized with 5m urea and colocalizes with ER marker proteins in sucrose density gradients. Fractionation experiments were performed with a c-Myc-tagged Dsl1 protein expressed at wild type levels. These results were later confirmed using antibodies raised against bacterially produced Dsl1 protein. We also tried to determine the localization of Dsl1p by immunofluorescence. Unfortunately, affinity purified polyclonal antibodies against Dsl1p still exhibited strong cross-reactivities and were thus not helpful for immunofluorescence analysis. Specific signals were only obtained when tagged versions of Dsl1p were overproduced. The expression of GFP-Dsl1p led to fluorescence pattern varying from Golgi-like staining consisting of a few large dots in cells from early logarithmic growth phase to nuclear staining at A600 nm >1. Overexpression of c-Myc-tagged Dsl1p led to diffuse punctate fluorescence. A cytoplasmic staining consisting of many small dots was also observed for Tip20p, which is cytoplasmic when overproduced. Tip20p could be recruited to the ER when Sec20p was overproduced as well (
      • Sweet D.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ). Given the tight genetic (see above) and direct interactions (
      • Ito T.
      • Chiba T.
      • Ozawa R.
      • Yoshida M.
      • Hattori M.
      • Sakaki Y.
      ) between Tip20p and Dsl1p they may behave similarly. Unlike Tip20p, overproduced Dsl1p does not localize to the ER when SEC20 was overexpressed simultaneously (data not shown).

      Dsl1p Interacts Strongly with Coatomer

      As mentioned above, a recent systematic yeast two-hybrid study revealed direct interactions of Dsl1p with Tip20p (
      • Ito T.
      • Chiba T.
      • Ozawa R.
      • Yoshida M.
      • Hattori M.
      • Sakaki Y.
      ). Dsl1p showed interactions with several other proteins. However, only in the case of Dsl1p and Tip20p, this interaction was observed with Dsl1p as bait as well as prey,i.e. both fusion orientations. This is consistent with the genetic data since the tip20-5 defect is synthetically lethal in combination with dsl1-22 (this study). The genetic as well as physical interaction between DSL1 andTIP20 and their gene products suggest that both proteins could be involved in the same transport step. Tip20p is able to bind to the cytosolic region of Sec20p (
      • Sweet D.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ). Together they form a complex with the SNARE proteins Ufe1p and Sec22p (
      • Lewis M.J.
      • Rayner J.C.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ). This unconventional SNARE complex is involved in retrieval of dilysine-tagged proteins from Golgi to ER (
      • Cosson P.
      • Schröder-Köhne S.
      • Sweet D.S.
      • Démollière C.
      • Hennecke S.
      • Frigerio G.
      • Letourneur F.
      ). In summary, Dsl1p interacts directly with Tip20p (
      • Ito T.
      • Chiba T.
      • Ozawa R.
      • Yoshida M.
      • Hattori M.
      • Sakaki Y.
      ), and the dsl1-22 mutation exhibits synthetic lethality in combination with sec22Δ, sec20-1, andtip20-5. Synthethic-lethal genetic interaction between mutations in SEC22, SEC20, TIP20, as well as UFE1 and mutations affecting coatomer subunits were established previously (
      • Hardwick K.G.
      • Boothroyd J.C.
      • Rudner A.D.
      • Pelham H.R.B.
      ).
      As expected, dsl1 mutants also exhibit genetic interactions with coatomer mutants (see Ref.
      • VanRheenen S.M.
      • Reilly B.A.
      • Chamberlain S.J.
      • Waters M.G.
      ; this study). Final evidence for Dsl1p playing an important role in retrograde Golgi-ER traffic is our finding that Dsl1p interacts physically with coatomer. Coatomer could be copurified with GST-Dsl1p from yeast cells, and it could be recruited from yeast lysates to recombinant GST-Dsl1p purified fromE. coli. No additional factors present in the cell extracts were required for this interaction since purified coatomer can also bind to GST-Dsl1p (data not shown). Interestingly, the C-terminal truncated mutant protein, Dsl1-22p, which leads to a defect in retrograde transport, is still able to bind all coatomer subunits with an affinity comparable to the full-length protein (data not shown). Thus the C terminus of Dsl1p is not essential for binding of coatomer but perhaps could represent a binding region for other proteins involved in these transport steps.
      Considering the fact that Dsl1p binds coatomer as well as Tip20p, a component of the putative docking complex at the ER, we suggest that Dsl1p is involved in a step between uncoating and docking. It will be important to determine whether Dsl1p can bind both coatomer and Tip20p at the same time or whether the interaction is sequential.

      Acknowledgments

      We thank François Letourneur, Renwang Peng, and Anna De Antoni for providing plasmids and yeast strains. We thank Anne Spang and Rainer Duden for critical comments on the manuscript. We thank Stefan Jakobs for help with the confocal microscope, H.-H. Trepte for electron microscopy, Mike Lewis and Rainer Duden for antibodies, Hans-Peter Geithe for sequencing, Hannegret Frahm for technical assistance, and Dieter Gallwitz for support.

      REFERENCES

        • Rothman J.E.
        • Warren G.
        Curr. Biol. 1994; 4: 220-233
        • Schekman R.
        • Orci L.
        Science. 1996; 271: 1526-1533
        • Cao X.C.
        • Ballew N.
        • Barlowe C.
        EMBO J. 1998; 17: 2156-2165
        • Guo W.
        • Sacher M.
        • Barrowman J.
        • Ferro-Novick S.
        • Novick P.
        Trends Cell Biol. 2000; 10: 251-255
        • Söllner T.
        • Whitehart S.W.
        • Brunner M.
        • Erdjument-Bromage H.
        • Geromanos S.
        • Tempst P.
        • Rothman J.E.
        Nature. 1993; 362: 318-324
        • Søgaard M.
        • Tani K.
        • Ye R.R.
        • Geromanos S.
        • Tempst P.
        • Kirchhausen T.
        • Rothman J.E.
        • Söllner T.
        Cell. 1994; 78: 937-948
        • Götte M.
        • Fischer von Mollard G.
        Trends Cell Biol. 1998; 8: 215-218
        • Hanson P.I.
        • Roth R.
        • Morisaki H.
        • Jahn R.
        • Heuser J.E.
        Cell. 1997; 90: 523-535
        • Sutton R.B.
        • Fasshauer D.
        • Jahn R.
        • Brunger A.T.
        Nature. 1998; 395: 347-353
        • Weber T.
        • Zemelman B.V.
        • Mcnew J.A.
        • Westermann B.
        • Gmachl M.
        • Parlati F.
        • Söllner T.H.
        • Rothman J.E.
        Cell. 1998; 92: 759-772
        • McNew J.A.
        • Parlati F.
        • Fukuda R.
        • Johnston R.J.
        • Paz K.
        • Paumet F.
        • Söllner T.H.
        • Rothman J.E.
        Nature. 2000; 407: 153-159
        • Yang B.
        • Gonzalez L.
        • Prekeris R.
        • Steegmaier M.
        • Advani R.J.
        • Scheller R.H.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 5649-5653
        • Fasshauer D.
        • Antonin W.
        • Margittai M.
        • Pabst S.
        • Jahn R.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 15440-15446
        • Nichols B.J.
        • Pelham H.R.
        Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998; 1404: 9-31
        • Götte M.
        • Gallwitz D.
        FEBS Lett. 1997; 411: 48-52
        • Darsow T.
        • Rieder S.E.
        • Emr S.D.
        J. Cell Biol. 1997; 138: 517-529
        • Grote E.
        • Vlacich G.
        • Pypaert M.
        • Novick P.J.
        Mol. Biol. Cell. 2000; 11: 4051-4065
        • Ballensiefen W.
        • Ossipov D.
        • Schmitt H.D.
        J. Cell Sci. 1998; 111: 1507-1520
        • Ossipov D.
        • Schröder-Köhne S.
        • Schmitt H.D.
        J. Cell Sci. 1999; 112: 4135-4142
        • Letourneur F.
        • Gaynor E.C.
        • Hennecke S.
        • Démollière C.
        • Duden R.
        • Emr S.D.
        • Riezman H.
        • Cosson P.
        Cell. 1994; 79: 1199-1207
        • Wieland F.
        • Harter C.
        Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1999; 11: 440-446
        • Cosson P.
        • Démollière C.
        • Hennecke S.
        • Duden R.
        • Letourneur F.
        EMBO J. 1996; 15: 1792-1798
        • Schröder-Köhne S.
        • Letourneur F.
        • Riezman H.
        J. Cell Sci. 1998; 111: 3459-3470
        • Lewis M.J.
        • Pelham H.R.B.
        Cell. 1996; 85: 205-215
        • Todorow Z.
        • Spang A.
        • Carmack E.
        • Yates J.
        • Schekman R.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 13643-13648
        • Dogic D.
        • Dubois A.
        • de Chassey B.
        • Lefkir Y.
        • Letourneur F.
        Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2001; 80: 151-155
        • Dascher C.
        • Ossig R.
        • Gallwitz D.
        • Schmitt H.D.
        Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991; 11: 872-885
        • Newman A.P.
        • Graf J.
        • Mancini P.
        • Rossi G.
        • Lian J.P.
        • Ferro-Novick S.
        Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992; 12: 3663-3664
        • Novick P.
        • Field C.
        • Schekman R.
        Cell. 1980; 21: 205-215
        • Lian J.P.
        • Stone S.
        • Jiang Y.
        • Lyons P.
        • Ferro-Novick S.
        Nature. 1994; 372: 698-701
        • Tsui M.M.
        • Tai W.C.
        • Banfield D.K.
        Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001; 12: 521-538
        • Lewis M.J.
        • Rayner J.C.
        • Pelham H.R.B.
        EMBO J. 1997; 16: 3017-3024
        • Cosson P.
        • Schröder-Köhne S.
        • Sweet D.S.
        • Démollière C.
        • Hennecke S.
        • Frigerio G.
        • Letourneur F.
        Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1997; 73: 93-97
        • Novick P.
        • Ferro S.
        • Schekman R.
        Cell. 1981; 25: 461-469
        • Newman A.P.
        • Shim J.
        • Ferro-Novick S.
        Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 3405-3414
        • Kaiser C.A.
        • Schekman R.
        Cell. 1990; 61: 723-733
        • Ossig R.
        • Dascher C.
        • Trepte H.H.
        • Schmitt H.D.
        • Gallwitz D.
        Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991; 11: 2980-2993
        • Spang A.
        • Schekman R.
        J. Cell Biol. 1998; 143: 589-599
        • Cao X.
        • Barlowe C.
        J. Cell Biol. 2000; 149: 55-66
        • Fukuda R.
        • McNew J.A.
        • Weber T.
        • Parlati F.
        • Engel T.
        • Nickel W.
        • Rothman J.E.
        • Söllner T.H.
        Nature. 2000; 407: 198-202
        • Xu D.
        • Joglekar A.P.
        • Williams A.L.
        • Hay J.C.
        J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 39631-39639
        • Hatsuzawa K.
        • Hirose H.
        • Tani K.
        • Yamamoto A.
        • Scheller R.H.
        • Tagaya M.
        J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 13713-13720
        • VanRheenen S.M.
        • Reilly B.A.
        • Chamberlain S.J.
        • Waters M.G.
        Traffic. 2001; 2: 212-231
        • Elble R.
        BioTechniques. 1992; 13: 18-20
        • Sherman F.
        • Fink G.R.
        • Hicks J.B.
        Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY1981
        • Boehm J.
        • Letourneur F.
        • Ballensiefen W.
        • Ossipov D.
        • Démollière C.
        • Schmitt H.D.
        J. Cell Sci. 1997; 110: 991-1003
        • De Antoni A.
        • Gallwitz D.
        Gene (Amst.). 2000; 246: 179-185
        • Bender A.
        • Pringle J.R.
        Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991; 11: 1295-1305
        • Orr-Weaver T.L.
        • Szostak J.W.
        • Rothstein R.J.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1981; 78: 6354-6358
      1. Evan, G. J., Lewis, G. K., Ramsay, G., and Bishop, J. M. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 3610–3616.

        • Schröder S.
        • Schimmöller F.
        • Singer-Krüger B.
        • Riezman H.
        J. Cell Biol. 1995; 131: 895-912
        • Peng R.W.
        • Grabowski R.
        • DeAntoni A.
        • Gallwitz D.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 3751-3756
        • Boehm J.
        • Ulrich H.D.
        • Ossig R.
        • Schmitt H.D.
        EMBO J. 1994; 13: 3696-3710
        • Benli M.
        • Döring F.
        • Robinson D.G.
        • Yang X.
        • Gallwitz D.
        EMBO J. 1996; 15: 6460-6475
        • Boecke J.D.
        • LaCroute F.
        • Fink G.R.
        Mol. Gen. Genet. 1984; 197: 345-346
        • Entian K.D.
        • Schuster T.
        • Hegemann J.H.
        • Becher D.
        • Feldmann H.
        • Güldener U.
        • Götz R.
        • Hansen M.
        • Hollenberg C.P.
        • Jansen G.
        • Kramer W.
        • Klein S.
        • Kötter P.
        • Kricke J.
        • Launhardt H.
        • Mannhaupt G.
        • Maierl A.
        • Meyer P.
        • Mewes W.
        • Munder T.
        • Niedenthal R.K.
        • Ramezani Rad M.
        • Röhmer A.
        • Römer A.
        • Hinnen A.
        Mol. Gen. Genet. 1999; 262: 683-702
        • Sapperstein S.K.
        • Lupashin V.V.
        • Schmitt H.D.
        • Waters M.G.
        J. Cell Biol. 1996; 132: 755-767
        • VanRheenen S.M.
        • Cao X.C.
        • Lupashin V.V.
        • Barlowe C.
        • Waters M.G.
        J. Cell Biol. 1998; 141: 1107-1119
        • VanRheenen S.M.
        • Cao X.
        • Sapperstein S.K.
        • Chiang E.C.
        • Lupashin V.V.
        • Barlowe C.
        • Waters M.G.
        J. Cell Biol. 1999; 147: 729-742
        • Sacher M.
        • Jiang Y.
        • Barrowman J.
        • Scarpa A.
        • Burston J.
        • Zhang L.
        • Schieltz D.
        • Yates J.R.
        • Abeliovich H.
        • Ferro-Novick S.
        EMBO J. 1998; 17: 2494-2503
        • McNew J.A.
        • Sogaard M.
        • Lampen N.M.
        • Machida S.
        • Ye R.R.
        • Lacomis L.
        • Tempst P.
        • Rothman J.E.
        • Söllner T.H.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 17776-17783
        • Hicke L.
        • Schekman R.
        EMBO J. 1989; 8: 1677-1684
        • Duden R.
        • Hosobuchi M.
        • Hamamoto S.
        • Winey M.
        • Byers B.
        • Schekman R.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 24486-24495
        • Johnson L.M.
        • Bankaitis V.A.
        • Emr S.D.
        Cell. 1987; 48: 875-885
        • Semenza J.C.
        • Hardwick K.G.
        • Dean N.
        • Pelham H.R.B.
        Cell. 1990; 61: 1349-1357
        • Rose M.D.
        • Misra L.M.
        • Vogel J.P.
        Cell. 1989; 57: 1211-1221
        • Nishikawa S.
        • Hirata A.
        • Nakano A.
        Mol. Biol. Cell. 1994; 5: 1129-1143
        • Ito T.
        • Chiba T.
        • Ozawa R.
        • Yoshida M.
        • Hattori M.
        • Sakaki Y.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 4569-4574
        • Hardwick K.G.
        • Boothroyd J.C.
        • Rudner A.D.
        • Pelham H.R.B.
        EMBO J. 1992; 11: 4187-4195
        • Frigerio G.
        Yeast. 1998; 14: 633-646
        • Simons J.F.
        • Ferro-Novick S.
        • Rose M.D.
        • Helenius A.
        J. Cell Biol. 1995; 130: 41-49
        • Holst B.
        • Tachibana C.
        • Winther J.R.
        J. Cell Biol. 1997; 138: 1229-1238
        • Sweet D.
        • Pelham H.R.B.
        EMBO J. 1993; 11: 423-432